As always, thanks Wiz for another video that includes only the facts and real numbers behind the odds. You always give us the straight talk without the BS promises of someone trying to take your money. Have a great holiday season.
Thanks for another thorough and informative video. I have tried this system and it can work in the short run. Of course, if you win two in a row, you should get your butt out of the chair and run. But few individuals have the discipline to do so. Also, I hope that you will mention the 2-1-2 system of John Patrick that I have used successfully for years. As a subscriber, I will look forward to future videos.
Hi, I appreciate your betting videos, can you run on your simulation 1000 times the following ;, bet one unit on the 1st and last dozen and see how the results end up. Thanks in advance.
1. I'm not sure why you say it's "breakeven" if you lose the third bet. You're actually +2 units, right? 2. This system works better in blackjack where the deck can become "favorable" for the player. You're taking advantage of a favorable deck just like card counters do but without counting the cards. A streaky deck is needed. 4 losses in a row is -4 units while 4 wins in a row is +12 units. Losses will happen if you get whipsawed between the first and second bets.
I believe there is an error in your Box diagram. The Final Box on the top Row and final Box on the bottom row appear to have been transposed. ie Bet 6u - win [yes] - End 12 u up ... Not "end breaking even" as shown. same goes box on the bottom if win = No. Should read "end breaking even" not "End 12u up" as shown. Another variation on so many other "progressive" staking plans that have been around since the days of Chariot Racing ;]. Over time there is no staking plan [that I know of] that will turn a level stake loss into a profit. Level stakes may be boring but it's the only way to make consistent Gains ... If you have the right selection method of course. Obviously a staking plan applied to a method that consistently makes a level stake profit, can enhance said profit ie increase stakes [as a %] as the starting Bank increases. Nothing new in that, but has stood me in good stead for the last 50yrs. Too damn old to change direction now. Happy Xmas.
I don'y understand, if betting system doesn't work why all videos of yours about betting system, why don't you make videos about house edge instead. This feels negative.
This is very educational! All gamblers should go through your videos at least once, before even setting a foot in a casino.
As always, thanks Wiz for another video that includes only the facts and real numbers behind the odds. You always give us the straight talk without the BS promises of someone trying to take your money. Have a great holiday season.
Thanks for another thorough and informative video. I have tried this system and it can work in the short run. Of course, if you win two in a row, you should get your butt out of the chair and run. But few individuals have the discipline to do so. Also, I hope that you will mention the 2-1-2 system of John Patrick that I have used successfully for years. As a subscriber, I will look forward to future videos.
I like your videos/informstion very much. Thx
Hi, I appreciate your betting videos, can you run on your simulation 1000 times the following ;, bet one unit on the 1st and last dozen and see how the results end up. Thanks in advance.
Why the player as opposed to the banker bet?
For demonstration purpose only. It would be more complicated to calculate with a 5% commission.
Many thanks Michael.
1. I'm not sure why you say it's "breakeven" if you lose the third bet. You're actually +2 units, right?
2. This system works better in blackjack where the deck can become "favorable" for the player. You're taking advantage of a favorable deck just like card counters do but without counting the cards. A streaky deck is needed. 4 losses in a row is -4 units while 4 wins in a row is +12 units. Losses will happen if you get whipsawed between the first and second bets.
I believe there is an error in your Box diagram. The Final Box on the top Row and final Box on the bottom row appear to have been transposed. ie Bet 6u - win [yes] - End 12 u up ... Not "end breaking even" as shown. same goes box on the bottom if win = No. Should read "end breaking even" not "End 12u up" as shown. Another variation on so many other "progressive" staking plans that have been around since the days of Chariot Racing ;]. Over time there is no staking plan [that I know of] that will turn a level stake loss into a profit. Level stakes may be boring but it's the only way to make consistent Gains ... If you have the right selection method of course. Obviously a staking plan applied to a method that consistently makes a level stake profit, can enhance said profit ie increase stakes [as a %] as the starting Bank increases. Nothing new in that, but has stood me in good stead for the last 50yrs. Too damn old to change direction now. Happy Xmas.
Love the hair
So good
Buy Tesla Baccarat Lover System
I don'y understand, if betting system doesn't work why all videos of yours about betting system, why don't you make videos about house edge instead. This feels negative.
So you lose the 600 bet you are back to nothing. This system is no good.
No one can casinos in a long-term.
Please do not gamble if you want to have a good future.