Fibonacci works great on 2 to 1 payouts or higher. No matter where you win on the sequence, you recover losses plus profit. Fibonacci on roulette changed my life.
2 years late to this comment... but I've been playing dozens using the fibonacci betting... and it's pretty potent. The deepest I've gone in the sequence before a hit, is 13. That 33% chance of winning sucks though.
Man, appreciate the depth of explanations given, and all the sims in second part too. :) Even though it obviously does not work, it could be interesting to employ it couple of times, just for fun's sake. And without going to deep into the sequence :)
@Vladimir Zdravkovic This is glorious, I been tryin to find out about "soccer betting picks today" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now )? It is a smashing one off product for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting without the headache. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my mate got amazing success with it.
Great video, You are correct in what you say. I use Fibonacci on the craps table, but when the dice heat up I ditch Fibonacci and just increase my bets by 50% until the7-out.
You gotta make sure you don't start too high, and you have enough in your pot to maintain the sequence if you hit a streak of losses. Otherwise you loose EVERYTHING, very FAST.
Fibonacci is not the worst system in the world, but you cannot make 100 dollar bets. If you play at a table with 10 min & 5000 max, you must start with the min bet allowed. Here's the sequence; 10-20-30-50-80-130-210-340-550-890-1440-2330-3220. This gives you a ladder of 13. Numbers still get very large but at least you have a little bit better chance in the short run. Problem is most gamblers don't have the patience to grind out a long session winning small amounts.
Lol. Minimum bet doesn't mean you have to start with that. Minimum bet means that, that is the "least" amount you can bet. You can start out with $500 if you wanted. And what he's showing everyone here is not for the 1:1 bets.
Could you break down the Math on No Mirror on the previous 6 Player or Banker Wins, using the 1,2,3,5,8,13 Fibonacci System for betting units please. Its what I use, and I want to see how much I am expected to lose over the long run.
Great work! Looking forward to more. Don’t let the inevitable losses get you down-doing the math and trying to beat the odds is more fun than gambling. Could you show the History board occasionally and at the end? Thanks!
@@itzamia with Fibonacci you can’t say you pick a column. You are hoping to hit that column within the number of levels your Fibonacci bankroll allows. And because it pays 2:1 any 1 win gets you into a very decent profit the higher up the sequence you go. I personally don’t play roulette much but if I did I would wait for 3-4 spins not hitting a certain dozen or column before beginning my sequence. If I have enough bankroll for 12 levels, then I could only lose if it doesn’t hit in 15 spins (since I waited 3 spins).
For simulation purpose, things would be complicated having a 5% Banco comission to consider. Punto pays 1:1 while Banco pays 0.95:1 It doesn't differ that much anyway (Punto -1.24% Banco -1.06%), but okay I see your point, whereas Banco wins 2 hands more than Punto out of 1000 hands played.
Interesting that you chose 1 unit win with 100 units bank!?!? I would think a 10-20% win goal would be standard. What are your thoughts on the increased risk of a higher win goal and the more likely eventual loss of the bankroll?
ihavehotmail2 indeed, above all what we should take from Mike’s videos is the understanding that no betting systems work. But if You wanna have fun and use a system, sure go for it, as long as u understand its not giving you an edge.
And even if you win online ,after a while you will get mails like account on review or some other bulshit ,reality is they dont lije people using this kind of sistem s what ever you and win in short period they will block you or get banned
Yeah making profit in daily basis with fibonacci strategy. You can use App like Roulette Kicker Pro to track dozens and columns. It will show alerts based on your settings
The issue here is that you're going two units to the left when winning. I've tested this strategy so many times and it's nearly impossible to lose. Go one unit to the right when you lose and one unit to the left when winning.
thats called the d`alembert... but If I understand correcty, youre combining it with the fibonacci? I`m sure the wizard has an answer to this as well.. lol. I was thinking of after an approx. 8 losing sessions in the last 1000.. why dont you martingale your unit size untill you have a profit?
Has someone actually tried this strategy and what was the outcome? I tried on the online casino European roulette simulator and have gone up by £40 in 30 mins! Looks like it does work better than other strategies I use. PS. My starting stake was £1 (£1,£2,£3...) Thank you!
I have a lot of respect for your math skills and statistics. But no betting strategy will even make a dent in a house advantage. My game was blackjack. I lost 20 consecutive hands once and another twenty consecutive hands with 2 blackjack ties. I also had a 14 consecutive losing streak to start a session. I’ve also had a dealer make 7 blackjacks against me in 10 hands. With any betting strategy based on increasing bets after a loss would have put me into an insurmountable debt to the casino. Yes you will be successful most of the time, but the one time you aren’t successful, it will be very expensive. I recognize that I was extremely unlucky to lose 20 consecutive hands twice. I’m also a decent blackjack player.
@@shirleymental4189 no betting system can even make a dent in a house advantage no matter what game you play. You will lose at whatever rate set by a mathematical percentage against you. But blackjack is different from the other games because once a card is played, it can’t come up again until the deck is shuffled. This can change the mathematical percentages from hand to hand. When a sufficient number of small cards have been played, that mathematical percentage can revert to the player. So betting more on those hands will work, because you know you have the mathematical edge before you make that bet. The other games like roulette are the same for every decision. It’s impossible to predict the future results by what has taken place in the past. If you lose 10 decisions in a row, your odds are exactly the same as they were when you lost the first one. If 36 comes up 4 times in a row, the chances for 36 coming up on the next spin remain exactly the same. Your only chance is to find an imperfectly balanced wheel and be able to take advantage of it. This would change the mathematical percentage of the certain numbers coming up.
@@shirleymental4189 the game of blackjack is not rigged. But the casinos have adjusted the rules to give themselves a much higher advantage over the player. The worst change is to pay blackjack 6-5 or even money instead of 3-2. Most casinos now hit a soft 17 instead of standing. Multiple deck are used. Many casinos don’t offer surrender anymore. Deck penetration is getting worse and the continuous shuffle machine is used in many casinos. It’s up to the players to refuse to play these games. If nobody plays them, the casinos will be forced to bring back the original blackjack games once again. Some blackjack games today have a house advantage of over 2% with optimum play by the player. The original blackjack games had a 0.015% house advantage with optimum play by the player. So no, the games are not rigged. The casinos have simply changed the rules to make the player lose much faster. But you, as a player should know this before you decide to play. So fight the casinos and don’t play. If nobody plays, then the casino profit from these games is $0.00. Tell everyone else not to play as well. The casino advantage at blackjack is so high that they don’t need to cheat you anymore. A 6 deck shoe with blackjack paying 6-5, dealer hitting soft 17, no surrender, no re-split Aces, no double after splitting a pair and double on 9,10, and 11 only is well over 2% for the casino. If you play this game or anything similar to these rules, your money will be gone before you realize what happened.
This is a great video for sure and very interesting. I think sometimes it's easy to confuse 'betting systems' with staking systems, no-one would sell this as a betting system would they? This seems to be a staking system to preserve the bank. I would like to see a staking system other than flat betting or card counting. A kind of progressive staking which takes advantage of the money you have won. Anyway keep up the great work and thank you again.
No. Either you get lucky then quit while ahead, or you will be quickly wiped out in one go by having to place huge bets which cannot be covered past a point . There is a chance of success/failure in each bet you place and no such thing as infinite bankroll or table limits.
@@grifter84 all betting systems that you use lose. look around you at the winners. they know something you dont. you comment is silly, for if all systems lose, no one would ever go to the casino. find the winning systems
The house edge of baccarat is 1.06% betting on the Banker and 1.24% on the Player for the 8-deck shoe. No matter how you manage the betting system, you are guaranteed to lose 1.06%-1.24% of your bets. Period.
Can you do a video on the Martingale? Christopher Mitchell is charging people $1K to meet him for personal coaching sessions in Vegas and word on the street is that all of his students are getting destroyed using his Martingale strategies!
@@NikolaZugic Rick Lee is a former student of CM who recently went on pro poker player Todd Witteles' radio show to expose how CM scammed and caused him to lose over $57K. ruclips.net/video/POQSOriLjkE/видео.html
All you need to know is that any betting system applied to a negative expectation game with a built in house edge will always lose in the long run. it doesn't matter how the sequence of bets is dressed up the math will always work out in favour of the casino.
@@Veaseify My non system betting wins by my method of throwing th e dice. I kid you not that I can show you how to hit the tall of the bonus craps bet more often than the law of averages.
There are tons of Asians who are playing high-limit Baccarat and you will see some of them are holding a pencil recording the history like a scientist. If they really studied that hard back in school, they wouldn't do that stupid thing. Card counting has no effects on changing the odds over the long term and there are no effective card counting methodologies for baccarat. Any mistakenly considered a working card counting method works only 50% of the time, which means it has no effects over long term. Unlike Blackjack, history of cards doesn't matter and card counting doesn't work in baccarat.
These session goals being the same as the initial bet seem to be the only point of lunacy to me. If your session goal is $100, why not try to reach it in different strings? $25 at a time and set it aside and start over. Saw the same thing in your Oscar's grind video and and don't think the initial bet being your overall goal is sane or sound. I wonder if your overall results change at all with a "string" approach.
@Rob $100 is just an example with a fictive $10.000 Bankroll = 1% of it. If you rather prefer playing with greens instead of blacks, sure go ahead. A bankroll of $2500 is then needed. 1 Unit is still 1 Unit no matter bet size.
@@kristofferkarlsson4260 You're not understanding my comment. It's lunacy to make the "session goal" the same as your initial bet. I understand that bankrolls adjust goals. But your session goal being the same as your first bet is just bizarre regardless of the denomination. This particularly applies to this betting system, where it would seem as though the bets can get large in an attempt to catch up on your losses. If your session bet is $100, you're better served doing the Fibonacci starting with $25 until you find success. Then start over with another $25, and another, and another. You prevent an astronomical bet that you can't achieve due to the table maximum being too small for the system. When you consider the minimum vs maximum table bet restrictions, stringing together smaller goals makes much more sense. What you're saying about bankroll is nearly irrelevant because this applies at a higher level too.
It isn't 50 /50 if you fallow the 3 patterns.dont bet everytime. Wait to bet streaks,chops, or pattern.hit your goal ,and stop.and move in when u see these patterns. If you bet everytime, you are settling yourself up for a chasing lose!!
M E L T Y here is lesson 1 ruclips.net/video/YKgc1EPFOl8/видео.html and the rest are available on my site... please feel free to subscribe to my channel :)
You must work for the casino. Because this video is a joke. And you know why. And it seems like the people praising you in the comments don't have a clue. Such a shame.
Fibonacci works great on 2 to 1 payouts or higher. No matter where you win on the sequence, you recover losses plus profit.
Fibonacci on roulette changed my life.
How much bank Roll? And where you playing scoops?
@@xckjyt - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
2 years late to this comment... but I've been playing dozens using the fibonacci betting... and it's pretty potent. The deepest I've gone in the sequence before a hit, is 13. That 33% chance of winning sucks though.
You must not have lost 20+ times in a row yet on the dozens
Is there somewhere I can test my own betting numbers?
I've never heard of Fibonacci betting system before. You have explained it in easy to understanding terms.
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
This is very educational! All gamblers should go through your videos at least once, before even setting a foot in a casino.
Man, appreciate the depth of explanations given, and all the sims in second part too. :)
Even though it obviously does not work, it could be interesting to employ it couple of times, just for fun's sake. And without going to deep into the sequence :)
Of course work but in the correct League, look my video
@Vladimir Zdravkovic This is glorious, I been tryin to find out about "soccer betting picks today" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Meyackentae Foundational Magic - (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now )?
It is a smashing one off product for discovering how to use this method to finally win at betting without the headache. Ive heard some incredible things about it and my mate got amazing success with it.
@@francoisr4036 - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
Great video, You are correct in what you say. I use Fibonacci on the craps table, but when the dice heat up I ditch Fibonacci and just increase my bets by 50% until the7-out.
great stuff,
I like the aggressive approach, increasing the stakes after the loss
You are going to get rekt my friend
@@fredsibarney7094 - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
You gotta make sure you don't start too high, and you have enough in your pot to maintain the sequence if you hit a streak of losses. Otherwise you loose EVERYTHING, very FAST.
How much bankroll you need to start and what bet?
love your work man. ive gone from degenerate to educated.. i love sharing your site
thank you, glad you find it educational and thanks for sharing my website.
If you want a safer system i have one... not spamming just telling you like it is
@@VegasGrind - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
What is the tool that you are using to simulate this?
DO YOU PLAY ROULETTE ? THE REASON I ASK THIS IS HAVE YOU EVER SEE A RESULT WHILE PLAYING TO SUPPORT YOUR SIMULATOR FINDINGS?
Fibonacci is not the worst system in the world, but you cannot make 100 dollar bets. If you play at a table with 10 min & 5000 max, you must start with the min bet allowed. Here's the sequence; 10-20-30-50-80-130-210-340-550-890-1440-2330-3220. This gives you a ladder of 13. Numbers still get very large but at least you have a little bit better chance in the short run. Problem is most gamblers don't have the patience to grind out a long session winning small amounts.
Lol. Minimum bet doesn't mean you have to start with that. Minimum bet means that, that is the "least" amount you can bet. You can start out with $500 if you wanted.
And what he's showing everyone here is not for the 1:1 bets.
Very precise and easy to understand description of Fibonacci system
Could you break down the Math on No Mirror on the previous 6 Player or Banker Wins, using the 1,2,3,5,8,13 Fibonacci System for betting units please. Its what I use, and I want to see how much I am expected to lose over the long run.
......Hello '''' wizard of odds ''''' I AM THE LOSER IN '' OZ '''''----- Sydney.....lol..
thank you for your work.....
Awesome explanation, thank you for sharing your knowledge
Great work! Looking forward to more. Don’t let the inevitable losses get you down-doing the math and trying to beat the odds is more fun than gambling. Could you show the History board occasionally and at the end? Thanks!
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
@@Xtremeismael - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
Fibonacci only works on bets that are 2:1 payout. Where only 1 win leaves you in decent profit. Such as columns or dozen in roulette
Do you play one dozen or two? Hedge the Green at all?
@@itzamia with Fibonacci you can’t say you pick a column. You are hoping to hit that column within the number of levels your Fibonacci bankroll allows. And because it pays 2:1 any 1 win gets you into a very decent profit the higher up the sequence you go. I personally don’t play roulette much but if I did I would wait for 3-4 spins not hitting a certain dozen or column before beginning my sequence. If I have enough bankroll for 12 levels, then I could only lose if it doesn’t hit in 15 spins (since I waited 3 spins).
@@iptvclub1575do you have instagram or any social media? I’d like to talk about this strategy a little bit in depth, 5 mins
Why did you do the explanation on player side when you state only bet on banker in baccarat?? What is the numbers on the banker side??
For simulation purpose, things would be complicated having a 5% Banco comission to consider. Punto pays 1:1 while Banco pays 0.95:1
It doesn't differ that much anyway (Punto -1.24% Banco -1.06%), but okay I see your point, whereas Banco wins 2 hands more than Punto out of 1000 hands played.
Interesting that you chose 1 unit win with 100 units bank!?!? I would think a 10-20% win goal would be standard. What are your thoughts on the increased risk of a higher win goal and the more likely eventual loss of the bankroll?
if you wanna take a bigger risk just play martingale
Nice video mike cant wait to try this when my casino opens up!
He said use this at your own peril
ihavehotmail2 indeed, above all what we should take from Mike’s videos is the understanding that no betting systems work.
But if You wanna have fun and use a system, sure go for it, as long as u understand its not giving you an edge.
The problem is many times when you play live in casino ,not realy balanced outcomes ,usually you can have lije 20 bankers
Best I think is martingale on sports by studying them over time
And even if you win online ,after a while you will get mails like account on review or some other bulshit ,reality is they dont lije people using this kind of sistem s what ever you and win in short period they will block you or get banned
This would be a great system for the field because of the double and triple on the 2 and 12
Just tried this out on his simulator. Made $150 in about 45 minutes with a base bet of $1. May try this with my free plays at the casino.
U can use this method, but don't depends too much in it..
I actually have a 100% reliable system. It’s called, walk away when you’re up or when you’ve lost the amount you went there with to gamble.
@@robkober9139 set your goal, stop at Win/lose target.. that it.
Yeah making profit in daily basis with fibonacci strategy. You can use App like Roulette Kicker Pro to track dozens and columns. It will show alerts based on your settings
"Use this at your own peril" hey at least my nan honest
The issue here is that you're going two units to the left when winning. I've tested this strategy so many times and it's nearly impossible to lose. Go one unit to the right when you lose and one unit to the left when winning.
thats called the d`alembert... but If I understand correcty, youre combining it with the fibonacci?
I`m sure the wizard has an answer to this as well.. lol.
I was thinking of after an approx. 8 losing sessions in the last 1000.. why dont you martingale your unit size untill you have a profit?
I found a baccarat system that consistently wins on your simulator at Wizard of Odds.
Has someone actually tried this strategy and what was the outcome? I tried on the online casino European roulette simulator and have gone up by £40 in 30 mins! Looks like it does work better than other strategies I use. PS. My starting stake was £1 (£1,£2,£3...) Thank you!
Bankroll?
I’ve done it with roulette betting Columns. First time I got up $400 2nd time I struggled to get $200 profit 3rd time I had to walk even
After a win you should be going back to 1.
Weird I can’t hear the conclusion section, I have sound for the whole video except the ending.
It's panned to the left for some reason
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
@@ZKorvin - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
I have a lot of respect for your math skills and statistics. But no betting strategy will even make a dent in a house advantage. My game was blackjack. I lost 20 consecutive hands once and another twenty consecutive hands with 2 blackjack ties. I also had a 14 consecutive losing streak to start a session. I’ve also had a dealer make 7 blackjacks against me in 10 hands. With any betting strategy based on increasing bets after a loss would have put me into an insurmountable debt to the casino. Yes you will be successful most of the time, but the one time you aren’t successful, it will be very expensive. I recognize that I was extremely unlucky to lose 20 consecutive hands twice. I’m also a decent blackjack player.
Blackjack is rigged. Don't trust it at all.
@@shirleymental4189 no betting system can even make a dent in a house advantage no matter what game you play. You will lose at whatever rate set by a mathematical percentage against you. But blackjack is different from the other games because once a card is played, it can’t come up again until the deck is shuffled. This can change the mathematical percentages from hand to hand. When a sufficient number of small cards have been played, that mathematical percentage can revert to the player. So betting more on those hands will work, because you know you have the mathematical edge before you make that bet. The other games like roulette are the same for every decision. It’s impossible to predict the future results by what has taken place in the past. If you lose 10 decisions in a row, your odds are exactly the same as they were when you lost the first one. If 36 comes up 4 times in a row, the chances for 36 coming up on the next spin remain exactly the same. Your only chance is to find an imperfectly balanced wheel and be able to take advantage of it. This would change the mathematical percentage of the certain numbers coming up.
@@shirleymental4189 the game of blackjack is not rigged. But the casinos have adjusted the rules to give themselves a much higher advantage over the player. The worst change is to pay blackjack 6-5 or even money instead of 3-2. Most casinos now hit a soft 17 instead of standing. Multiple deck are used. Many casinos don’t offer surrender anymore. Deck penetration is getting worse and the continuous shuffle machine is used in many casinos. It’s up to the players to refuse to play these games. If nobody plays them, the casinos will be forced to bring back the original blackjack games once again. Some blackjack games today have a house advantage of over 2% with optimum play by the player. The original blackjack games had a 0.015% house advantage with optimum play by the player. So no, the games are not rigged. The casinos have simply changed the rules to make the player lose much faster. But you, as a player should know this before you decide to play. So fight the casinos and don’t play. If nobody plays, then the casino profit from these games is $0.00. Tell everyone else not to play as well. The casino advantage at blackjack is so high that they don’t need to cheat you anymore. A 6 deck shoe with blackjack paying 6-5, dealer hitting soft 17, no surrender, no re-split Aces, no double after splitting a pair and double on 9,10, and 11 only is well over 2% for the casino. If you play this game or anything similar to these rules, your money will be gone before you realize what happened.
How would this be done in roulette????
it must be a 2:1 for it to actually work, preferably wait for it not to land in a certain column a couple times and then start your sequence
This is a great video for sure and very interesting. I think sometimes it's easy to confuse 'betting systems' with staking systems, no-one would sell this as a betting system would they? This seems to be a staking system to preserve the bank. I would like to see a staking system other than flat betting or card counting. A kind of progressive staking which takes advantage of the money you have won. Anyway keep up the great work and thank you again.
baccarat tko does... i bought that dumb system
I have a winning system but I won't tell you. Since I don't anyone to play it casinos would catch up. And I made it you can't find it anywhere.
@@igor6815 the only winning system for a casino mate, is the one which results in you going to prison for armed robbery. Jog on.
@@pnr8uk no. I make 200 per day playing baccarat
@@igor6815 ok good luck with that
That is too rich for my tastes, an awful lot to put on the line for the return but thanks for the information.
excellent video ...
No. Either you get lucky then quit while ahead, or you will be quickly wiped out in one go by having to place huge bets which cannot be covered past a point . There is a chance of success/failure in each bet you place and no such thing as infinite bankroll or table limits.
Fibonocci is very dangerous... Vegas Grind on the other hand uses the slow and steady approach and your max bet is only 3 units
good video Mike
what is he best betting system ?
None. All betting systems lose. You cannot beat the house edge with a betting system.
@@grifter84 all betting systems that you use lose. look around you at the winners. they know something you dont. you comment is silly, for if all systems lose, no one would ever go to the casino. find the winning systems
Well the good news is that no betting system exists that will increase a house advantage either!
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
You leave as you win. The longer your session the more chances you will lose.
The house edge of baccarat is 1.06% betting on the Banker and 1.24% on the Player for the 8-deck shoe. No matter how you manage the betting system, you are guaranteed to lose 1.06%-1.24% of your bets. Period.
Great video
I was thinking of after an approx. 8 losing sessions in the last 1000.. why dont you martingale your unit size untill you have a profit?
This as an educational video of the Fibonacci system.
Right
Demo mode is not reliable. Should apply the system at real game table
It only works if you have a high bankroll and unlimited table limits.
All these are money management systems, but none f them will work unless u have a good betting stategy to go with them
# you
Can you do a video on the Martingale? Christopher Mitchell is charging people $1K to meet him for personal coaching sessions in Vegas and word on the street is that all of his students are getting destroyed using his Martingale strategies!
who ever is paying for these “winning systems” is getting robbed of their money
@@NikolaZugic Rick Lee is a former student of CM who recently went on pro poker player Todd Witteles' radio show to expose how CM scammed and caused him to lose over $57K.
ruclips.net/video/POQSOriLjkE/видео.html
All you need to know is that any betting system applied to a negative expectation game with a built in house edge will always lose in the long run. it doesn't matter how the sequence of bets is dressed up the math will always work out in favour of the casino.
@@Veaseify My non system betting wins by my method of throwing th e dice. I kid you not that I can show you how to hit the tall of the bonus craps bet more often than the law of averages.
£2500!
It's kind of unbelievable that you basically can't win with so many changes the fibonacci system is giving. like most of them were minus somehting.
常注闲 (避 免抽佣) 这投注法 输死你，如果是长庄？你可以跟着下注闲几回 (10，15，20- - - 回 的 不停下注?)😂
Also the guy who disliked the video is the guy in the casino who always wins using the fibin sequence lol
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
@@Xtremeismael - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
There are tons of Asians who are playing high-limit Baccarat and you will see some of them are holding a pencil recording the history like a scientist. If they really studied that hard back in school, they wouldn't do that stupid thing. Card counting has no effects on changing the odds over the long term and there are no effective card counting methodologies for baccarat. Any mistakenly considered a working card counting method works only 50% of the time, which means it has no effects over long term. Unlike Blackjack, history of cards doesn't matter and card counting doesn't work in baccarat.
They are not counting cards. They usually are writing down the score, for Asian eyes only.
You need a 5k chip and double button.
Los big.
And win small
Meny show have 10. Or meby some time 20 bancer
😂 omg he was down 2000 Dollars trying to win 100 Dollars great system lol😂 if he had lost 2 more times he would of lost 10k Nuts!
No gamblers will risk so much to win so little after such a long time. This is not applicable to a 1 to 1 payout.
But great work on vids 👌
the best strategy to earn money is on my channel, just uploaded today
These session goals being the same as the initial bet seem to be the only point of lunacy to me. If your session goal is $100, why not try to reach it in different strings? $25 at a time and set it aside and start over. Saw the same thing in your Oscar's grind video and and don't think the initial bet being your overall goal is sane or sound. I wonder if your overall results change at all with a "string" approach.
I Agree...
@@okorocha12 - Learn to be profitable: ruclips.net/video/60OB6IWTMpA/видео.html
@Rob $100 is just an example with a fictive $10.000 Bankroll = 1% of it. If you rather prefer playing with greens instead of blacks, sure go ahead. A bankroll of $2500 is then needed. 1 Unit is still 1 Unit no matter bet size.
@@kristofferkarlsson4260 You're not understanding my comment. It's lunacy to make the "session goal" the same as your initial bet. I understand that bankrolls adjust goals. But your session goal being the same as your first bet is just bizarre regardless of the denomination. This particularly applies to this betting system, where it would seem as though the bets can get large in an attempt to catch up on your losses. If your session bet is $100, you're better served doing the Fibonacci starting with $25 until you find success. Then start over with another $25, and another, and another. You prevent an astronomical bet that you can't achieve due to the table maximum being too small for the system. When you consider the minimum vs maximum table bet restrictions, stringing together smaller goals makes much more sense. What you're saying about bankroll is nearly irrelevant because this applies at a higher level too.
You have bet wayyyyyyy to much to make a measly $100. Not a good system.
Too risky man. I would prefer d’alembert
With a baby's voice,'" hi RUclips"'
😂😂😂
Bacarrat is just 50/50
It isn't 50 /50 if you fallow the 3 patterns.dont bet everytime. Wait to bet streaks,chops, or pattern.hit your goal ,and stop.and move in when u see these patterns. If you bet everytime, you are settling yourself up for a chasing lose!!
@@jamesv3615 its fucking random These are addiction patterns your seeing
@Mizai Baccarat isn´t 50/50. It is 49.47/49.38 Don´t forget the house odds!
Why should it work? No any single reason...
No betting system works.
Have to disagree... my system works on a consistent basis
@@VegasGrind share it with me shhhh
M E L T Y here is lesson 1 ruclips.net/video/YKgc1EPFOl8/видео.html and the rest are available on my site... please feel free to subscribe to my channel :)
@Nin Poms click on my picture to go to my channel and watch live play
My live play is now on RUclips.com/vegasgrind
I think this ( click bait ) video is a little bit below your standards ?
You must work for the casino. Because this video is a joke. And you know why.
And it seems like the people praising you in the comments don't have a clue. Such a shame.
risk 10000 to win 100 great system
It is just for educational purpose only.
your to quiet
Turn your volume up then.
stupid ideas
Too lengthy and waste of time,, risks are same as martingale but outcome is not half as good.
No, Martingale is even riskier. Fibonacci is slower with less risk, but with less outcome in the short run.
Idiotic betting system. What idiot would waste his or her time?!!!
Oke .now u eat🍌🍌🐒🐒
TY.
190923/