Isn’t the Bible Full of Errors?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 авг 2018
- The Scriptures have more historical support than any other ancient document we have today. And that, by a lot.
www.desiringgod.org/messages/...
www.desiringgod.org/messages/...
#SermonClip
I can't believe how this came up. I was having my morning devotions and I was reading a Greek interlinear bible. I also was praying that God would reveal something to me to help my faith in the Bible. As I was reading it I got a notification that John Piper just posted a video on RUclips called isn't the Bible full of errors. And I amazed how it became apparent that God heard my prayer and said heres something for you. The interlinear bible is helpful, if you want to research each word to compare it to context in the Bible, as long as you understand the way it was written in the time. Unfortunately many don't, so looking for proof through this means can be somewhat unhelpful if we don't understand the full history of the language. We now rely on the translations of upstanding scholars to interpret it faithfully. I have found a couple versions that do it well. Regardless..... This video seemed to be a direct answer to prayer for me in my morning devotions and I am thankful to God for hearing my cry for faith building in a way I did not expect at the exact moment I ask for it. God is good
Travis Jeror What are versions you beleive that do it well?
UnArmedFilms do what well?
Translations that interpret faithfully well?
UnArmedFilms I'm definitely not qualified to answer that lol. I was just trying through the Internet
Travis Jeror....kjv..
..esv is wicked..
Amen! God Bless Dr. Piper for this wonderful truth about the reliability of Scripture.
What he's talking about doesn't mean the bible is true, just that they're pretty good at figuring out what's closest to original.
There is no reliability of the the scriptures. There all pure man made garbage that was stolen from other religions.
Bullshit
I'm a big fan of History and will get the this Autobiography of William Tyndale by David Daniel.. blessings.. Pastor John and church..
Good thing Josephus manuscripts survived to validate that the end times did indeed happen as Jesus said it would. Thank God no one is talking about the error of end times today. Praise Jesus for supporting texts!
We're still here, lol
@@brianstrutter1501 we are in the end times now. According to scripture, also the Bible mentions the comments you just maid, people will make, lol.
According to the old testament prophecies, Jesus wasn't the messiah.
@@cnault3244 right, no name was given. But it's 100% fulfilled. So I'm cool with that.
@@cnault3244 Who was it, then? Thanks.
These are awesome schoolings
What story in the gospel of John is he referring to at the end of the clip?
The story of the woman taken in adultery in John 7:53-8:11
Yes! Truth talk!
The Holy Scriptures are perfect representation of God's Holiness and Character.
But I think some of the word of God was lost do to poor translation.
Panda Cheeks No. Poor translation may sometime blur some important truths, but still, in the original manuscripts, the Word is perfect.
"Poor translation may sometimes blur some important truths" Exactly, you said it yourself sir.
then why not translate it so its 100% accurate?
etf42 ah great idea, I'll work on that...
Only needed to hear last 10 sec....kidding. Glad he's thorough.
Timely Post!
I love your work too!
Has anyone taking notes of this and can send them under this comment. My english isnt the best so i didnt know everything to write down and yes-
AMEN!!!
Which story in John is he discussing?
John 8 : Woman caught in adultery
AMEN
(hierarchy within the triune God).
John 1:1 > In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1 John 5:7 > For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Revelation 20:14 > And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 > Then cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign, till He hath put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. For HE hath put all things under His feet. But when HE saith all things are put under Him, it is manifest that HE is excepted, which did put all things under Him. And when all things shall be subdued unto Him, then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto HIM that put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
God who is Spirit, is Triune and in His Wisdom from timeless past has 3 dimensions, The Father, The Word and The Holy Spirit, that becomes manifest according to the "need" and "time" to be manifested to His Creation primarily Mankind. When all is done (1 Corinthians 15:28 and God is all in all) after the redeemed are born again and themselves in eternity on the New Earth, God who is Spirit will dwell with Mankind and thereafter 2 of the dimensions are subsumed into HIMSELF because their manifestation is redundant as there is no further "need" and besides there is no "time" ; the Son, the Word becoming flesh, has already (in obedience to the Father from the beginning) fulfilled His role and "Holy" being the essence of Spirit of God has no independent role.
amen thank you brother
Jesus is the way the truth and light.. india will be Christian and will bring light on the Muslim Serpents
I am unsure of my salvation because I do not seem to delight in God or feel any love for Him. I obey Him out of obligation and fear of Hell, rather than obeying out of love. So what do I do now? How do I make myself feel the emotions that are necessary for salvation? Since I am asking God to give me those emotions and I am still not feeling them, does that mean that I am not one of the elect?
John Piper often speaks of how delighting in God and treasuring Him above all else is necessary in order to go to Heaven, but what should one do if they do not delight in Him or treasure Him? I'm beginning to lose hope and I think I may be a lost cause.
Kylee B I understand where you are coming from, I too have struggled with assurance. Biblically, salvation is more then a feeling or an emotion. If God has granted you repentance and you have sincerely called out to Him and asked for forgiveness by faith alone in Jesus Christs substitutionary death and resurrection, and have repented of your sins and started to make a sincere effort to wage war and overcome your sins, then those are the fruits of regeneration and salvation. Our desires for God and delight in Him stem from Him granting us deeper understanding of what He has done for us through His beloved Son Jesus. Do we love Him perfectly? Not even close, but Jesus will recognize our imperfect love and affection towards Him if we are sincere. In Revelation 2 the Lord commended the church at Ephesus for their good works, but rebuked them for leaving their first love. Fervently ask the Lord to give you the grace to walk in those new desires towards Him that you have received as a new creation in Him, ask Him to reveal His beauty and grant you the knowledge of who He is, and how you can give Him glory and show Him your love for Him. The epistle of 1st John has good passages to help us examine ourselves and see the fruit of true believers. There's also a free book from John McArthur Called , "Remember and Return : Rekindling Your Love for the Saviour", it has helped me in growing into those new affections for the Lord. I pray this helps you and I will keep you in prayer. Shalom! //
"Therefore they said to Him, "What shall we do, so that we may work the works of God?" Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent."
John 6:28-29 NASB /"So Jesus was saying to those Jews who had believed Him, "If you continue in My word, then you are truly disciples of Mine; and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."
John 8:31-32 NASB / "Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you-unless indeed you fail the test?"
2 Corinthians 13:5 NASB /"For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them."
Ephesians 2:8-10 NASB/ and hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured out within our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us.
Romans 5:5 NASB/ "If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love; just as I have kept My Father's commandments and abide in His love."
John 15:10 NASB /"The one who says, "I have come to know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him; but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected. By this we know that we are in Him: the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked. Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. As for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him. If you know that He is righteous, you know that everyone also who practices righteousness is born of Him."
1 John 2:4-6, 15, 27-27, 29 NASB
Let me reassure right now, that you are CARING if you would bother to be concerned or ask questions at all. So don’t be anxious, JESUS CHRIST is here to advocate ON YOUR BEHALF! He’s not attempting to disqualify you on a technicality because
A) He wouldn’t have to disqualify us, we come to Him hopelessly disqualified already
B) John 6:35-40
35Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst. 36“But I said to you that you have seen Me, and yet do not believe. 37“All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out. 38“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39“This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day. 40“For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.”
Perfect love casts out all fear, and this is According to His Word, not according to how we feel at the time. The gospel is Good News!!! So let us repent and put our trust daily in the Finished Work of Jesus Christ!
Get into a bible believing fellowship and put on the Armor of God, which will protect from the accusations of the Enemy. God bless you!! I’m praying for you!
Carlie Trogicj Yes salvation is free of course. Discipleship does take commitment though. Not works theology its just the fruit of being born again.
Just as God to show you how to love Him with everything you are. Keep talking to Him. He hears you & He will respond. Remember to be patient & trust Him. He has it all worked out. ❤️
I meant “ask” Him.. not “as” Him 🤗
The information on manuscript evidence is perhaps decades out of date. We are finding more and more manuscripts, including ancient ones for both non Christian as well as Christian texts. I think the Illiad is over 1300 now, and many are the ancient fragments. Of course no complete text for any ancient document predates about 700 AD. But among the thousands of fragments found, if changes had been made we continually keep missing the parts that had the changes.
Just say yes and move one Pastor
If I want to become a Christian which local church is is best to go to to find out? Catholic, Methodist, Anglican, Baptist, Unitarian or seventh day Adventist? Confusing. I've heard one guy say Anglican but another says Catholic, but family are Methodists or evangelicals, whilst my other friend is Baptist. I don't get all the differences or how you decide which is 'right'?
Go to mosque. and its also less confusing for you, because we only have 1 Quran. Quran is right. And its mentioned there:
Quran 5:46 - "And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Gospel, in which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous."
Find a church that line's up with God's Word. Read the Bible and pray to God. Ask God to lead you. Obey God's Word. Pray for discernment to find the church that God wants you to go. Don't let man lead you, God says what is true in the Bible. Read God's Word and pray for God to be with you and lead you. Jesus saved you. You need to read the Bible yourself so you know what is God's word and what isn't God's word.
Christianity is based on an unknown manuscript by unknown authors compiled into a book with numerous errors and conflicts. "Ministers and Pastors" have become such good charlatans, they make you listen to them and they ask you to read one or two verses in the bible. 99% of Christians never even read the entire bible. Sad. Visit a Mosque and get a major upgrade. The Quran talks at length about Jesus CORRECTLY. In Fact Jesus is mentioned 25 times in the Quran vs Mohammed mentioned 5 times. The Quran has no errors and it's only one version passed down in word form memorized by millions.
@@borkeninternet how do you know the Quran is correct, especially as it is hundreds of years more recent than the New Testament?
@@stubdo16 Scripture isnt like wine; the older the better. If that were true we should all be following the Vedas and become Hindus. You have made this mistake when saying the Quran is young because you have the same experiences with the Bible - age has cleaned up some (but not all) of the glaring errors. Im sure in a few hundred more years, the bible will get all fixed up so it resembles the word of god. This line of thinking you are on - older is better - works for archaeology where errors can be adjusted. Unfortunately that doesnt help people of today that are experiencing loss and suffering on a daily basis. The Quran, however, does.
I love Pastor John’s ministry, but most scholars would agree we actually don’t know who wrote the Gospels. Although all point to Jesus being divine and Messiah, it’s likely Matthew, Mark, Luke and John did not write the letters.
I was legit praying yesterday for god to help me wiru my faith
I Needed Jesus to Help me..He showed me the verses worthwhile and I leave the rest alone.
kathleen Wharton - the longer you walk with Him, the more you’ll find that all of God’s Word is His Word to you. It all fits and works together.
Amen ❤❤
"The text is changing. Every time that I make an edition of the Greek New Testament, or anybody does, we change the wording. We are maybe trying to get back to the oldest possible form but, paradoxically, we are creating a new one. Every translation is different, every reading is different, and although there’s been a tradition in parts of Protestant Christianity to say there is a definitive single form of the text, the fact is you can never find it. There is never ever a final form of the text."
- Bible scholar David C. Parker
So if Luke's infancy narrative is a later addition to a gospel text that originally started at chapter 3, that wouldn't "change the story"? What if 2 Corinthians is actually an edited patchwork spliced together from no-longer-surviving epistles, those originals wouldn't "change the story?". How could we know? What if John 21 is an addition to an earlier version of the fourth gospel that originally ended at 20:31? Does nothing in chapter 21 really matter to "the story"?
These are just three examples off the top of my head where there is significant debate amongst scholars. Simply put, there ARE serious issues concerning the original text that goes beyond mere spelling, grammar, and slight change of words. These include disputes over spelling, words, phrases, entire sentences, entire paragraphs, entire chapters, and even entire books and canons.
@Cee Why said: "we still have the original manuscripts my friend"
No we don't. We don't have any 'original manuscript' of any of the New Testament books. What we have instead are later, varying manuscripts and Church Father comments about the state of the text in their respective periods. This is not about the canon, but the text of the books currently included as 'the canon'. There are places where we don't know what was and wasn't "original" (such as the examples I gave above about Luke's infancy narrative (chapters 1-2), John 21, and the entirely of 2 Corinthians (which appears to many scholars as a splicing together of now-lost earlier epistles). What counts as "the original" in such scenarios? And these are just three examples off the top of my head. They could easily be multiplied with similar problems that scholars acknowledge. I'm sorry, but it's simply not true that it's only spelling and grammar issues.
@@scottbignell Any Intelligent well Knowledgeable Person can see many things of problems. Slaves beat them only if they don't die in 2 day's is crazy and the more red the more craZY.
If it is full of erroneous information or demonstrably false doctrines, it is not "word of God". Period.
Amen
Where's the full sermon folks?
Nefu Steel - you can usually find his full sermon source by tapping the circle i (info button) upper right of video. I find them useful :)
PortCanon. Ok, just clicked on it. So this excerpt comes from "Neither Do I condemn you" sermon, right? Cool. I'll listen to that one too. God bless.
Answer: no...emphatic .....no.
Guys copy errors should not bother you. Of course, the bible was written by people and people make mistake. And, the kind of errors we talking about are variation issues, which is like punctuation. How can you not expect variation errors, when you have to copy a manuscript over thousands times. Unless they are not coped by humans.
The issues are not only punctuation variations though. The Easter story, for example, is told differently in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Acts. All of the stories about how Jesus resurrected are different in many ways. Also, Mark chapters 9-20 were added years after the original Mark chapters 1-8. And many scholars argue that ch. 9-20 aren’t even canonical; they were just added to help make the story make more sense when compared to the other gospels.
Here is something to consider: ffrf.org/legacy/books/lfif/stone.php
And I’m not saying this should or shouldn’t change your faith, I’m just saying that if you are going to believe then you need to know this stuff.
SillverBel
I know Bart for years. Majorities are punctuations. And, who cares if 5 or 6 versus were added or taken away in the past, we can still address them using the rest of the text. The way we noticed some of the texts were added or avoided later, was by using comparing with the rest. So whatever he says does not affect my faith in Jesus. Who cares one scholar has issues believing in the bible or not.
SillverBel
The link you attached was written by Atheist. The kind of people humans are nothing but just DNA machines. And everything came to exicstance from nowhere.
Right, but I think you should still consider what he is saying. Atheist or not, all he did was simply quote the Bible itself. If anyone were to try to write a linear Easter story without omitting any details from any of the gospels, would they succeed? It's a simple question. If not, then you have to ask yourself 'is what I'm reading reliable? And if so, based on what merit? If there are contradictions in these stories (Like Jesus appearing to the disciples in completely different cities in the books), then how do I reconcile this? which story is true?'
I'm not saying I have the answers to these questions; I'm simply saying that in order to be a knowledgeable Christian, you should probably know these things in the case that an unbeliever asks you about it. Because if they ask you and you don't know how to answer, what are the chances that you will raise their confidence in God?
SillverBel
Of course, it is realiable. I understand no one knows or see what the original bible looks like. But, even Bart agrees that today's bible is nearly 98% similar to the manuscripts we have today. And, it is not true that, jesus appeared in different cities in different books. But, he was explained differently by almost every disciples. Does that mean, the books/stories are not realiable, No. If u and I asked to describe Barack Obama' personalities, I am sure we would not come up with same exact words and sequences but same messages. Why are you applying today's educational standards/ text critical methods to justify books written by just spiritual people who forced on conveying a message or pass down what they see.
There are around 800,000 words in the KJV of the Bible! It contains millions upon millions of individual alphabetical letters! Any errors are minor and do not change doctrine!
Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
Google, Night Signs, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
You know how much evil and corruption. Evil powers and stuff there is!
Always learning yet never coming to a knowledge of the truth…
These “scholars” will affirm a questionable document, with very limited resources, yet doubt and even express disdain for documents that have almost 6,000 manuscripts and fragments. Wow
Right on, The bible does have mistakes but the basics are there and if you want to dig deeper then all the truth can be found.
There are no contradictions in the Word of God if you rightly divide the Truth. Gospel of Kingdom of Heaven to the Jews and Gospel of Dispensation of Grace to Gentiles and Jews alike until the time of the gentiles are fulfilled. (hierarchy within the triune God).
John 1:1 > In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1 John 5:7 > For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Revelation 20:14 > And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 > Then cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign, till He hath put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. For HE hath put all things under His feet. But when HE saith all things are put under Him, it is manifest that HE is excepted, which did put all things under Him. And when all things shall be subdued unto Him, then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto HIM that put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
God who is Spirit, is Triune and in His Wisdom from timeless past has 3 dimensions, The Father, The Word and The Holy Spirit, that becomes manifest according to the "need" and "time" to be manifested to His Creation primarily Mankind. When all is done (1 Corinthians 15:28 and God is all in all) after the redeemed are born again and themselves in eternity on the New Earth, God who is Spirit will dwell with Mankind and thereafter 2 of the dimensions are subsumed into HIMSELF because their manifestation is redundant as there is no further "need" and besides there is no "time" ; the Son, the Word becoming flesh, has already (in obedience to the Father from the beginning) fulfilled His role and "Holy" being the essence of Spirit of God has no independent role.
How do you dig deeper when the starting point has glaring errors
@@borkeninternet
The Holy Spirit will teach you the truth, if you ask.
@@ronm6349 Agreed! Thats why I read and follow Islam. No errors. Peace in the heart. Job done.
@@ronm6349 So is the Holy spirit god? Or is that one of the triune god heads? Please research the history of trinity. That word is never used in the bible. Its made up by man.
All of the Word of God is Truth; in its time and context. Rightly divide the Truth - (hierarchy within the triune God).
John 1:1 > In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1 John 5:7 > For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Revelation 20:14 > And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
1 Corinthians 15:24-28 > Then cometh the end, when He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He shall have put down all rule and all authority and power. For He must reign, till He hath put all enemies under His feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. For HE hath put all things under His feet. But when HE saith all things are put under Him, it is manifest that HE is excepted, which did put all things under Him. And when all things shall be subdued unto Him, then shall the Son also Himself be subject unto HIM that put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
God who is Spirit, is Triune and in His Wisdom from timeless past has 3 dimensions, The Father, The Word and The Holy Spirit, that becomes manifest according to the "need" and "time" to be manifested to His Creation primarily Mankind. When all is done (1 Corinthians 15:28 and God is all in all) after the redeemed are born again and themselves in eternity on the New Earth, God who is Spirit will dwell with Mankind and thereafter 2 of the dimensions are subsumed into HIMSELF because their manifestation is redundant as there is no further "need" and besides there is no "time" ; the Son, the Word becoming flesh, has already (in obedience to the Father from the beginning) fulfilled His role and "Holy" being the essence of Spirit of God has no independent role.
Hope its true but full book needed in full context. Romans tries to read God saved us befor Jesus but Jesus said difference between the two? How can i see your sin when i all ready Killed it Dead for a blind man can't see right? but of course we were not built to sin so God forbid and change but sin is the new law and suffering in it is for life wile in the first Death.
+PortCanon..I read the whole bible..every word. I did not read a word without Jesus With me. He showed me which verses were worthwhile..those are the words I read. I leave the rest of it alone. Jesus is my Savior..not the bible.
Those who want all answers from the Bible are looking for the Law. That covenant is dead, salvation now comes from faith in Jesus.
+StuntedShadow..Jesus did not say the bible was breathed out by God. . Paul Said it. Jesus is my God and my Savior. Paul is not God. You are welcome to him. I believe Jesus.
"The Scriptures have more historical support than any other ancient document we have today."
Can you present historical support for any of the miracles in the Bible?
If you are saying this, it means to me that you’ve never heard about Quran.
@@roadstarautobody5258 If you are saying that, it means you have no evidence for the miracles in the Quran.
@@cnault3244 I guess you misunderstood the previous Comment because one of the greatest historical confirmations for the existence of Christ in general is indeed the holy Quran that truthfully acknowledges in many passages Jesus Christ as a true prophet of God.
@@martinwagner7361 " one of the greatest historical confirmations for the existence of Christ in general is indeed the holy Quran that truthfully acknowledges in many passages Jesus Christ as a true prophet of God."
I guess you misunderstood the previous Comment because it is those claims & passages that have not been proven yet.
You didn't post anything to prove the veracity of those passages.
Until those passages can be proven as true, the Bible and the Quran can be dismissed as fables and myths.
@@cnault3244 well, at the current moment I can't yet "post consciousness"....
I had as an Atheist around 20y ago a NeardeathExperience like many others.
Though there is at the moment a paradigm shift happening in science as the material reductionist model of conscious is lying in it's deathbed you sure are aware that any experience of consciousness can only subjectively be experienced and not fully objectively be proven yet..
Yet I can deduct indirectly that in the fierce competition between religions Islam had zero interest to validate the existence of Jesus Christ, quite to the contrary they would have avoided anything that would back up and give validity to any rival religion - if that would have been possible....
I know beyond any doubt that God as a living Light of supreme Consciousness exists simply because I have experienced it while I had been put into artificial coma and should have been totally unconscious.....a couple of things that I witnessed during the Nde were actually only known to my mother - and she had NEVER talked with anyone about what I saw there and confronted her later on.....it was a real shock for her that I experienced something during the Nde that she desperately tried to hide her entire life....
Many others have experienced similar things, currently the skeptics are unable to come up with any alternative theory, all such "theories" are easily debunked like last Neurons firing etc..
But since I was an Atheist myself I know that most atheists have no interest to sincerely explore the huge body of evidence in for example Nde but only want to defend their atheistic belief system......
And Christianity has deeply distorted the teachings of Christ, I didn't obviously go to hell as an Atheist, lol.
With the progress of reanimation medicine we will get hundred thousands of solid testimonies of Ndes over the next decades, it's up to every person to examine closely and honestly the body of evidence - or NOT.
When the time of physical death comes everybody will anyway experience for themselves what happens when ones consciousness snaps its ties with the body......I have no need to convince anybody, especially not when they imagine to already now.
What I do recommend though is to really examine this question of God / survival of Consciousness after physical death very carefully since no other subject has such far reaching personal consequences and a wrong outlook/ perspective on life can be very costly for the individual.......that's all.
The amount of time and effort needed to prove the authenticity of the Bible, itself points to the fact that Bible is a human effort to translate and explain the Christian doctrines and in that effort , the orignality of the teachings of Jesus was affected and human interpretations marred with political or social pressures made way into its text ( as no original text exists to compare ). Today the Bible ( the name Bible not mentioned in the book called Bible) is the most controvercial text of human history .
That is why God doesn't preserved the Bible. Bible is not a word of God, it is not the Gospel of Jesus.
@@hairullyt2999 Not even that as it contradicts itself at many places and has thousands of mistakes ,which the Christian theologists are still struggling with.
Lots of the Modern versions of the Bible Such as Nkjv, Niv, Esv, Nlt, Nasb Have lots of Contradictions
They remove a lot of versus and very important versus
and in almost all of them They removed the word Hell out of the Old Testament
I recommend reading Kjv
No contradictions whatsoever
And yes I am a Kjv Onlyist
shoot me. But just know this I got a c- in AP Language Arts and can understand the literature of the Kjv pretty well.
Joey Tran I do not agree about this claim. No credible biblical scholar backs this claim
J Mach
Hey James White does not count (Yeah you were probably thinking about him)
Mainly Because he is literally an illiterate pseudo intellectual who can't read a 3 letter word
He read Ado
as "a Doe"
Like what? The Word Ado isn't that hard to pronounce It's used in sentences like "without further ado... we present..."
Also read 1 Corinthians 1:18
Kjv vs All other english translations
You'll find a contradiction
"He who had ears let him hear"
Also did you know that The Translators of the Niv Bible made a 2011 version that is Gender Neutral?
Are you serious? Gender Neutral Bible?
Stupid, wicked above all wickedness
I curse them for leading the blind into Hell with them may God destroy them quickly
And yes There are times in the Bible where it is Appropriate to curse people
Paul Did it, David definitely did a lot of that and so on and so on
So yes curse God's enemies Only the ones that Hate God and Rise up against him Psalms 139
Also one more thing I don't hate you I love you i'm telling you this because i care and i'm concerned for your soul The last thing i want for people like you is saying Lord Lord on that Day
Look Whenever someone is a Self Proclaimed Bible Scholar just because they studied at some university doesn't mean they are approved workman in Christ Jesus For all we know they could just be a part of those Scribes and Pharasies
Who yes knew Scripture but not God
so read the Kjv for yourself before you say anything okay?
God Bless
Joey Tran I appreciate your worries and believe me, I use to go to a KJV only church. However, after studying Greek and going with the ESV, it is pretty accurate. In addition, Victorian English is outdated and many new individuals reading KJV do not really understand. This is a problematic to me. For many people who did not read the bible as it is attended by its author is missing the point (i.e Jehovah's witnesses). So I know there is people who can't read Shakespeare, and are KJV only. This is a problem for one of the translators of the KJV was Shakespeare himself. God Bless brother. I wouldn't curse you for I dont have the authority to do so.
J Mach.....esv is luciferian..
The septuagint is a reliable source. While this guys says it was first in greek it wasn't. It was in it's original Hebrew. But the Greek Septuagint was widely copied because it was the most accurate from the original texts. KJV is ok, but I would atleast recommend reading the Septuagint as well, especially if you want to get to the closest thing. It includes the apocrypha in most copied versions, but just disregard that if you want.
If you believe what’s written in the Bible, then you believe Hebrew cosmology correct? This question is for any of you that think you know what you’re talking about
I’m sorry but when the Bible can’t even agree on when Jesus was born? The rest is highly suspect!!
Anthony; that’s not the only example. The Bible isn’t sure if he was born before or after heroes death. Don’t you think that suspicious? They can’t agree on where he was born what happened after her was born. How long were they in Bethlehem after his birth? The gospels differ there as well. They can’t agree on what day he died. They don’t agree how long it took to die, what he said before his death? They can agree on that either. Was the stone in front of the tomb or not? Who was there? Who were the witnesses? The gospels can’t agree on that either. And the census that supposedly required all citizens to return to there ancestral home from 1,000 years prior? What a ridiculous lie!! Imagine trying to perform a census in such a fashion in any nation ever? Half of all citizens at a minimum, would be required to leave?? Ludicrous!! Plus the romans kept census records and I’m pretty sure it would have been mentioned 😂 you sir are clinging to your mystical beliefs!! When any reasonable person would question such inconsistencies. If you want to believe fiction is fact then that’s your choice. But would you really want to wager your eternity?
Anthony Ochoa; the Bible says slavery is okay, genocide is okay. As long as your not killing or enslaving Israelites. Is this a book you truly want to believe? Are you an Israelite? I highly doubt it. Do you eat shellfish? Do you wear more than one type of cloth? Do you eat pork? Do you work on the sabbath? Do you cause others to work on the sabbath? Because if you want to claim you believe in the Bible then maybe you better live it to the letter! Or you sir will burn in hell!! Because I am willing to bet that you don’t even know what the Bible says. You believe what someone told you about it. You’ve never read every word let alone tried to live it to the letter. When was the last time you celebrated Passover? Do you even know the law of Moses? Hypocrisy is loathed by Christ himself believer. So maybe you should practice what you claim to believe before you preach to anyone else
(gosh he is really pushing it ... and he is mentioning charging money? ummm well ... nvm)
Whatchu talkin bout
I love Jesus too and im not arrogant to not accept the truth but why are you so sure and how could i be so sure . Everything About christianity is written years after Jesus died how could you be so sure they didn’t fabricated the whole thing . Second of all you jumped to the conclusion that Jesus is god and in the books he never clearly claimed divinity, and what’s with the pop and priests forgive your sins (they are humans like me) .
And how could someone moral and righteous on isolated island who never managed to come in contact with christianity go to hell while a killer/rapist who believes in Jesus eventually goes to heaven. And is god three or one and why is this complicated concept and why are so sure that god is three is this all according to the gospel, and why animals has to suffer for us and is the story of noa not taken from other metholigy , and why so many denominations does Jesus wants for christians to divide and who is right and why the other believers in Jesus has to go to hell too many questions i will humble myself and search for the truth if there is any but someone has to ponder these questions
100%. Bible is full of errors and conflicts.
No. Next question.
Yes many times
Old testament: Kill people who committed adultery!
New testament: Dont kill people who committed adultery!
Also old testament: Adultery is OK if god gives you his personal OK
@@cnault3244 What? :DDD
"personal OK" ???
@@sonus89 Hosea 1:2 The beginning of the speaking to the Lord in Hosea. And the Lord said to Hosea, Go thou, take to thee a wife of fornications, and make to thee sons of fornications, for the land doing fornication shall do fornication, (going away) from the Lord. (The beginning of the word of the Lord that came to Hosea. And the Lord said to Hosea, Go thou, take thee a wife of adulteries, or of idolatries, and make thee children of adulteries, for the land hath done adultery, or idolatry, going away from the Lord.)
@@cnault3244 The Lord told Hosea to marry an adulterous wife, he does not command Hosea to commit adultery himself.
It is because BIBLE WAS CORRUPTED.
Opinion...opinion...opinion...
+StuntedShadow.. I am not missing anything. I explained this in my original statement. I read the entire bible with Help from Jesus. He says to Seek Him. He is my Teacher. He showed me which bible verses were worthwhile. I marked all those and those are the ones I read. If Jesus wants me to read other than those..HE will tell me. I do not read men's recommendations..I do not follow men.
+PortCanon.. I have found just the opposite. The more I Seek Jesus and the Closer I became to Him..the less and less I need the bible. I was born into a crackpot church that followed the bible. All I needed to know from the bible was Who Jesus Was..To learn And Obey Jesus Sayings and Seek Him everyday. He is With me Everyday. I go to Him for the answers to my questions and solutions to my problems. I do not have to go back to an old book and see what He told some Isrealite.
I once took a bath in a crackpot tub. It was a bad experience.
The guy who was responsible for this particular tub, obviously didn’t read the instruction manual very well.
Get to know the Master Plumber. Read his manual, the whole thing. He wrote it with YOU in mind.
He’ll never steer you wrong, and since He’s the Author of the Book, He’ll never contradict His own Words.
Be blessed, Kathleen.
Or, become a KJV believer and you’ll be able to know God preserved all his words!
ruclips.net/video/KOZPlW2MAMI/видео.html
@@punisherlee Edwardpf123 disputes what is commonly said of the KJV translators. But beyond that, if the KJV isn’t the infallible word of God, we need to give up Christianity.
@@ProjectCould I guess the rest of the non-english speaking world is doomed then... 🙄
@@ClauGutierrezY Not at all.
Yes. There are errors. A simple unbiased reading shows this.
Did you watch the video?
@@look2christ777 Can you help me reconcile John and Matthew's resurrection accounts? I'm trying to figure out if Jesus appearance to Mary in Matthew 28:9-10 took place before or after his appearance to her in the tomb as we read in John 20:11-17? It seems like Matthew 28:9-10 would have to take place after John 20:11-17 since Mary still thinks Jesus' body had been taken in John 20:11. However, if Matt 28:9-10 takes place after John 20:11-17, why is it that everything about Jesus and Mary's interaction in Matthew 9&10 suggests that it was their first time seeing each other since his crucifixion? Not only does Mathew contain no mention of Mary seeing Jesus prior to verses 9&10, verse 9 says “and behold,” as if Mary hadn’t just seen Jesus just a little while earlier. Then there's the fact that Jesus says “don’t be afraid” as if his presence would come as some surprise to these two women who would have already known that he had been resurrected if John 20:11-17 had taken place prior. And then the way they dramatically worship him at his feet like it was their first time seeing him in a long time. Also, Mary would have just previously been told by Jesus not to cling to him (John 20:17), so why would she take hold of his feet (Matt 28:9) just a little while after that? Also, if Mary departed from Jesus at the tomb in John 2:18, how and why would he appear to her again on her way back from the tomb? Did he dematerialize and rematerialise on front of her, or did he take some shortcut in order to cut her off on the path? What a bizarre thing to do, and what would be the point? He already told her at the tomb to tell the disciples what happened, so why does he need to tell her again? Can you make sense of this?
@Crim Sin That may be a typo, but that verse you quoted is from Matt 28:9, not Matt 29. How would the author have expected his readers to know that "they" and "them" was referring to the disciples and not the women, when the women are the only ones mentioned going go to the tomb and speaking with the angel? The first verse of the chapter tells us exactly who that plural pronoun ("they") in verse 9 refers to. It says "After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, *Mary* *Magdalene* *and* *the* *other* *Mary* went to look at the tomb." If the author wanted us to think that the disciples were part of that group, wouldn't he have said so? Pronouns are to be understood by their prior context, and there's no contextual indication that any of the plural pronouns that appear between verses 1 and 10 refer to anyone other than Magdalene and Mary the mother of James.
Crim Sin Just looked into that Jehoiachin contradiction. It looks like the common apologetic response is to claim that it's most likely a scribal error, since in Hebrew the numbers 8 and 18 are distinguished by a small mark. So basically they're just providing an account for why the contradiction exists, instead of trying to argue that it's not a contradiction. Isaiah 40:8 says "The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever." Well if the apologists are correct, then apparently the word of the lord in 2 Chronicles 36:9 didn't endure forever.
Crim Sin Here are another couple of examples you could check out if you haven't already done so: (1.) When commissioning his disciples to go out and evangelize, did Jesus tell them to bring nothing EXCEPT a staff, as in Mark 6:8, or to bring NO staff, as in Luke 9:3?
(2.) Luke 16:18 says *_"anyone_* ( the greek word for 'anyone' is 'hos', which is an all-encompassing term) who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery. If it is the case that ANYONE who puts away(i.e. divorces) his wife and marries another commits adultery, then it logically follows that there can be no one who puts away his wife and remarries without it qualifying as adultery. However, Matthew 19:9 says "anyone who puts away his wife, *except* *for* *sexual* *immorality,* and marries another commits adultery. So if Matthew 19:9 is true, then Luke 16:8 has to be false.
Absolutely, scriptures and so called ‘holy books’ are written by the most common of men, so what would you expect. The fact that they are old doesn’t make the content more valuable apart from the historical settings and for pastors, preachers, popes and god-men off course who make a pretty good living from this ancient material. My personal advice: go for philosophy. It’s not as easy to digest and requires some effort but if you think there is a god you must appreciate the thought that he is more impressed by those who use their god given brain to question his existence, think and experience for themselves compared to those that prefer to be lazy by simply believing somebody else’s beliefs.
Begs the question by confusing originality with truth. Ok, this is what the originals really say. Nice, but you still have the issue of interpretation and that's the rub. If I find 5000 original copies of the New York Times written in 2016, 2000 years from now, and I'm positive that that's what was truly written, what does that say about the news? It only tells me what the authors thought about the news. Then again, I can't imagine anyone holding on to the NYT for more than one day let alone 2000 years. Give Piper another two minutes and he'll be arguing that his interpretation of the New Testament is the only one that gets you into heaven. In other words - he is the inerrant gatekeeper.
The bible is proof God exist. People like to claim it's full of errors yet it's still to this day printed. God said his word will last forever.
Nothing in it's text has been proven to be false.
Darth Bane; the Bible lies about the resurrection!! Was the tomb open? Or closed? Who saw the empty tomb? The Bible tells three different stories and they are all different. So yeah read the book maybe? Because you don’t know anything about it obviously
Please read and verify before making this statement
Half way in ... and still haven’t heard a coherent answer to the damn question !! Shits irritating ...
and before it was written it was handed down orally he forgot that part have you ever played the telephone game??
The bible like most ancient books to day are a copy of a copy of a copy of the originals They were copied by hand by monks in training But they were always double check multiple times just one mistake in the roll and the whole role was thrown out. there were no variation the dead sea scrolls prove there was no errors in the new testament bible
Have you read the Dead Sea Scrolls? It doesn't even have the book of Esther in it. Should we disregard that book? Since you want to use it as a model...
Leviticus 12:3 “On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised.”
Galatians 5:2 “Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all.”
Anyone care to explain that to me? It all sounds like nonsense.
thomas Jefferson ' Paul the first corruptor of the doctrines of Jesus.'
The new testament as a whole affirms that since Christ has given himself as the final sacrifice for sin, the ritual requirements of the old testament are fulfilled in him and are no longer required of Gods people. Circumcision, like many rituals, was a "shadow of the things to come" as the new testament puts it. As God commanded Israel to be circumcised as a removal of flesh to join his covenant family, Jesus circumcised the heart by removing flesh (sin) from our heart and giving as a new heart...
All of this is talked about pretty thoroughly in the NT and it's hard to boil it all down in a YT comment. Basically, since Gods covenant relationship with his people is new in Jesus, the old ritual law is set aside in him, being fulfilled. Galatians as a whole goes into this more.
Specifically, in the Galatians passage, it is saying that if people attempt to get to God by following ritual laws, then they aren't trusting in Jesus's sacrifice for their sin, but their own righteousness which cant save.
@@jonathanpearson4522 ""Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." Who said that?
@@jonathanpearson4522 So at one point people actually thought that by cutting the foreskins off the penises of boys they'd find favor with or "get to" God? That's pretty much whack by anyone's standards.
Im not willing to believe a book is the word of God when it was written by people. I don't trust any man that claims to be speaking for God...
It was copied from Sumerian mythology
Have u ever heard about Quran ?
@@hairullyt2999 I trust the Koran even less than the Bible
@@stussysinglet Quran 55 ruclips.net/video/e0rU1lUhzjY/видео.html
Pray for God to help you and lead you to Him.
No
I can't come up with a single reason why Bart Ehrman Is so hostile to Christianity?
Amanuel Tefera I believe he prayed for his dad to be healed and his dad died, and that shook him up.
Austin Ruiz
that's funny. Was he expecting God to keep his dad forever?
He wrote a book. You could read it and find out.
Aman Addis be a use he was told that he could be true by knowing the genuine article, then when he looked into it he realised the bible was not a genuine copy of the original. If you’ve got a fake dollar bill you have a fake dollar bill. Bart erhman should be commended for that should he not? Not a dollar bill. He truly believed it was a genuine dollar bill until he checked it out and found it didn’t resemble the original at all. If you replace the head of the axe and the handle you have an axe but not the original. He is blatantly lying about it not affecting doctrine of the Christian faith because Luther wanted James removed (not by faith alone) he added faith alone where he could. The verse in John 5:7 about god being 3 persons was added to justify the trinity, etc etc. it goes on on. He means the verses added or removed don’t affect his own person subjective view, if we look at the original they have been removed or added in accordance with that view. ESV proof of this, it’s remarkably different to the KJV not becuause language has changed but the prevailing doctrine has changes. And that should make every Christian terrified to use the bible to justify their stance because it’s not what god said but what the church saw fit to add and take away as it’s pleased. Sadly by just asking what the bible says about faith alone or the trintiy we can see it affects church doctrine very very much. Wish it wasn’t so but it’s the truth. He want to maintain the line that the bible dictates doctrine. But it’s the other was around. ESV no greater example. Most people arguing for the trinity, faith alone are utterly convinced there’s is genuine ... be real about it. Get any Protestant to admit THEIR version is the fake. They Can NOT all be true, good luck. John piper even says this is a copy of a dollar bill which makes it better than a real dollar bill? True using Monopoly money at the supermarket next time you go. Tell them it’s a copy but that makes it better. How far will you get? Ridiculous! Go right ahead try it in the real world away church . Only in church does someone stand up say I know this ain’t a genuine copy but that makes it so much better, dear god. I defy you to take a known corruption to your GOD and say to him “this is better than yours”. Discaraceful. Shameful. Disgusting and I’m calling him out on it, are you? The case of the story of the woman caught in adultery.... did Jesus say “let he is without sin cast the first stone” . ? We want him to but he maybe never did which means we idolise this story
Read the book his book on suffering if you wish to know. Otherwise you should stop spouting this speculative bull shit
"The Scriptures have more historical support than any other ancient document we have today. And that, by a lot."
But none of this historical support is for the global flood, Noah, Lot, Job, Moses, the Exodus, Jesus, the resurrection, or any of the miracles described in the Bible.
Also no historical evidence for a census at the alleged time of Jesus' birth and no record of any Roman census that required the people to return to the land of their ancestors to be counted.
It does get some geography right.. as well as getting some of it wrong. And it does mention some people for whom historical evidence exists... just as Marvel and DC comics also mention some people who actually exist and like the Robin Hood stories mention some people who actually existed.
My sincere question is , why would God choose to reveal himself through a storyline that can be deemed as plagiarized?? We know for a fact that the story or concepts of a "virgin birth, death, and resurrection" can be found ascribed on the walls inside the pyramids of Egypt.. This storyline and its concepts preceed the birth of Christ by thousands of years. How can we not take this into account when evaluating for authenticity??🤔🧐🫶🏽
Charge more money for a better reading makes no sense but one sense it does make is Man your saying are inspired up with these story's and if Christians are so not to hear what you just said is freakish. and scary for a Smart christians believeing for 1000 years suddenly see a dim truth that is catastrophe. Creator please Dumb us down so we don't see what your really made of. Man tried but knowledge increases for the Sad truth of a lesser loving creator because we did some thing we don't have a clue witch makes no sense because sense does not come in something we do not have a clue about? and whats advising about a more inspired by Man Book..
The Bible has no errors nor contradiction: 9) who was the father of Joseph husband of Mary? a) Jacob (Matthew 1:16) b) Heli (Luke 3:23) defense answer : the statement Heli is supposed to be the Father of Joseph meaning he is not a real father. Heli is the step father of Joseph his real father is Jacob. 10) When Jesus met Jairus Was Jairus daughter already dead? a) Yes, quo
te him saying " my daughter has just died". (Matthew 9:18) b) No, quote him saying, "my little daughter at the point of death" (mark 5:23). defense answer: at these time there are two person who need Jesus for healing disease. one is Jairus young daughter and the other one is woman who have disease of issue of blood or delay menstruation 12 years. When Jairus met Jesus his daughter was at the point of dead but Jesus first went near home the woman has the disease of issue of blood or delayed menstruation in 12 years and got healed while Jairus went home to look the condition of Jairus daughter and when Jairus met again Jesus, He said his daughter was just died, then Jesus said your daughter is not dead she just sleeping and when Jesus healed his daughter she is risen from dead. Jairus daughter resurrected. 11)How did Judas died? a) after he threw money, he went away and hanged himself (Matthew 27:5) b) after he bought the fieldwith price of his evil deeds with price of evil deeds, he fell headlong and burst in the middles and all his bowel gush out (acts 1:18). defense answer: Judas Iscariot bought a field wherein He committed suicide, he hanged himself to the tree beside of steep r
CHERRY PICKING FRUITLOOP. who you trying to inspire but only you. a view verses and you know the entire book. twisted as would you take a Person of any kind and beat them all you want as long as they don't Die in 2 Days. and only just because they could not find a Job. you go to prison for life today is kinda strange.
Matthew Mark Luke and John did not write the Gospels. The true authors are unknown.
Sounds like a sales pitch...again....
Find your faith through personal experiences!
GB!!!
Having eyes, they don’t see. Having ears, they don’t hear. Ever met people who became even dumber even after having experience? Like how many Americans living in America don’t even understand what being American truly is? Having eyes, they don’t see.
man john piper just sharing his knowledge about the bible.
The Greek root really means this, and the Hebrew word really means that. Back in the day, this is how they really meant it. Because Pastor RUclips told me so.
Boom. Skeptics owned.
sounds like a rationalization of the inaccuracy and contradictions in the bible, which are supposed to be infallible
Sounds like you’ve got a lot of hurt weighing you down, etf42.
Your comment reminds me of my own, many years ago.
Mind if I pray for you?
not at all, please do
Sounds like me a couple of years ago too. I love the way God leads us through our pain to greater faith in him. Still growing and learning. Prayers as well.
I am always open to being proven wrong or having my mind changed
etf42 THAT very ‘openness’ and just wanting to hear Truth gave me a chance to learn.
Stick with Piper, if you find his content intriguing.
This particular clip demonstrates that he doesn’t mind airing the truth, even if it makes many uncomfortable. I serve a mighty God and I never have to fear what is True.
Also, Debbie is spot on, I was seeking Truth, but it wasn’t until I had a crisis of pain that I was really willing to lay down my own firm arguments to long enough to listen to wisdom.
Hey, at least know there are a few people out there who have your back in prayer. 💪🏼
Man this guy is delusional!! Bart erhman at least gives evidence for his conclusions!! I guess if you believe a fictional book is the word of god then you will believe anything
Keep in mind, this isn't an attempt at a scholarly approach to history. It's a popular one. It's a sermon - notice how as he speaks, he mentions the "sem folks", or seminary students/faculty. This is not intended to be a careful or exhaustive list of all of the historical evidence surrounding the Bible, it's intended to be a popular communication of confidence that the Bible has been faithfully preserved over time. If you want a MORE scholarly work, read evidence that demands a verdict by Josh and Sean McDowell. I think the historical portion of the book is super cool. If you want more scholarly work, read seminary papers.
Michael Martinez; If the Bible is true then how could it contradict itself? Truth doesn’t change. The Bible is not true. God doesn’t change his mind. God doesn’t condone genocide, God doesn’t condone slavery, the Bible does
That’s a slippery slope. Not all Christians would fall for the belief in anything, especially those with strong faith.
You, mr Piper, say we would idolise the original manuscripts yet you idolise what have now in a fanatical obsessive way that borders on psychosis
The followers of textual criticism are all wrong on the subject. It doesn't matter if they are liberal or orthodox.
They ignore the fact that the true Bible, that sparked the reformation was translated from the Textus Receptus, which is truly the infalible, inerrant Word of God, preserved by Him through the ages.
Only in the 1800's, at the time of enlightening, and evolution, and marxism, and all that, that the two racist anglican priests Westcott and Hort forged their "new" new testament from the Critical Text (Sinaiticus + Vaticanus). The Critical Text differs from the True Scripture in the Textus Receptus in over 8,000 differences, which in large DO AFFECT doctrine in a big way.
Believing that the Critical Text (which is Nestle-Aland which is Sinaiticus + Vaticanus) is the word of God is to beilieve that God decided to preserve His Word in the library of the Vatican and in a dumpster of a catholic institution. It is to believe that the "right" manuscripts came from Egypt, the land from which God has been telling His people to get away from since the Old Testament.
And the fact that the Critical Text manuscripts are older, actually are a testimony of how BAD they are. A document being preseved like that means, actually, that THE CHURCH NEVER USED IT, because it knew it was garbage.
Sadly, the only translation of the Textus Receptus in English is the King James, which is very hard to read for most people.
Instead of wasting time trying to defend the Critical text, this scholars should work on formal, literal and current translation of the King James, to get the Bible back into the people's hands.
Amen
@Michael Murphy Right, right. God gave an incomplete Bible to the early church and kept it that way for 1500 years.
C'mon son. You know that's not true.
God inspired His word in Hebrew/Aramaic (for the Old Testament) and Greek (for the New Testament).
What a load of genuine bull crap.
Nate Franco and what does the quran say ?
Who cares, that psalm was written thosands of years before the quran existed...
MrRamyon74 yes indeed.
@@gertscheper9653 The goat ate the Quran..
Anyone who bothers to read the bible, in whatever translation, cannot deny that there are literally thousands of direct, factual contradictions throughout the book. The absurdity of claiming that there are no errors nor contradictions defies the simplest examination.
One example alone: from the most important story in all of the bible, the execution of jesus, the gospels explicitly claim that he was executed on two different days in two different gospels. How can that be not a contradiction, not an error? Even if one is correct, the other is, patently, wrong.
With little effort, any actual "scholar," who is not intent on proving some preconceived and false claim, could produce a hundred similar contradictions, from the gospels alone, in a week.
Lol 100% nonsense !! 😂
Amen