Which film emulation is better? NEW DaVinci Resolve 19 Film Look Creator VS. Dehancer Pro

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 апр 2024
  • Is the new DaVinci Resolve 19 Film Look Creator better than Dehancer Pro? In this video, we take a deep dive into the many differences of both film emulation effects and compare them side by side so you can see for yourself which one is best for you!
    #davinciresolve19 #dehancer #filmlookcreator
    Be sure to use my promo code AUSTINSMITH ‪@Dehancer‬ .com to get 10% off your purchase.
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 98

  • @phpn99
    @phpn99 3 месяца назад +11

    FLC doesn't produce a "film" look. It produces a look. I've worked professionally with retired senior colour scientists from Kodak and the nature of the film look is a whole lot more complex than any of these systems are able to emulate. The whole genre of these tools is a fallacy ; their designers have no clue what the numerous steps are in the spectral domain, to end up with a projected print. Kodak chemists had Fortran scripts to predict the colorimetric behaviour of their chemical choices ; they'd du multiple batches, print trials and invite cinematographers to help them pick the most promising formulations. I've seen these math models and they are nothing like the ridiculous gadgets offered on Resolve. My advice : Use the new Color Slice tool and eyeball a look that satisfies you ; the design of the Color Slice tool will get you quickly in the ballpark if you have eyes to see.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      Really great point! 👍🏼

    • @robertulrich3964
      @robertulrich3964 3 месяца назад +1

      exactly! the color slice tool is the one that gets your colors into the ballmark. the film look creator is maybe 5% the look.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Great point!

    • @VicerFx
      @VicerFx 3 месяца назад +3

      The goal is not to make a 100% equal emulation, no one here is Steve Yedlin, but the tools are great to create good looks, they just need to resemble what film looks and take off some of the digital look

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      @VicerFx right!

  • @oedipax4
    @oedipax4 3 месяца назад +1

    This is the best explanation I've seen of color management for BRAW footage in Resolve, thanks a lot!

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Thank you! I’m glad it was helpful!

  • @HeartflashProductions
    @HeartflashProductions 3 месяца назад +2

    I wanted to make this comparison video but now there’s really no need for it. Great job! 👏🏼

  • @Fedorevsky
    @Fedorevsky 3 месяца назад +1

    Great video! I have been testing the new film creator as well lately and I use it along with the new color tool in Beta 19 to be able to do more of the color changes you can do in Dehancer with it. I find this to be a great combo. I've had Dehancer for a couple of years now and I will probably be using both of these options for different projects depending on what I wanna accomplish. Sometimes you really want a specific film stock like you mentioned and then Dehancer is better. Of course you can also add one of the Cineon film print options to the end after using the film creator to achieve Kodak or Fuji print look but there's not that many options there compared to all the film stocks in Dehancer and Dehancer also has Fuji and Kodak printing options.

  • @CRESTROY
    @CRESTROY 3 месяца назад +1

    Great video man!!

  • @ugpfpv361
    @ugpfpv361 3 месяца назад +2

    Nice explanation! music a little annoying to me though, but now I can try out the new aido features too😂

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Thank you! Noted on the music 👍🏼🙂

  • @adventuresofjandk
    @adventuresofjandk 3 месяца назад +1

    Just the video I needed. I work in fcpx and have been trying to decide to go with dehanser or learn resolve.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      I’m glad it helped!

    • @snappedbycorey
      @snappedbycorey 2 месяца назад

      I’m in the same boat. What did you end up choosing?

  • @illyrian8991
    @illyrian8991 3 месяца назад +1

    Great explanation. But the music is just too loud. Please tone it down so that it's just something that we can hear in the background.

  • @kthalas
    @kthalas 3 месяца назад +3

    IMHO the most useful tool from dehancer was their grain, it was really something special, also their prints, so I’ll try those. Thanks for the info

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Dehancer has really great grain! no problem!

    • @Fedorevsky
      @Fedorevsky 3 месяца назад +1

      Yeah, Dehancer also has that digital grain option they just call noise as an option that works more like the Davinci grain and is not as heavy on your machine.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Great point!

  • @dondouglas
    @dondouglas 3 месяца назад +2

    I believe that DVR applies all available resources and immediate access to tasks. This update is reminiscent of course of Dehancer Pro, but also of Mononodes that does a unique job and in audio of Rip X Daw. I don't think it can be compared because the DVR integrates everything and the other applications are very specific. You just have to celebrate the effort to put everything within reach and show companies the way and provide wonderful tools.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      Good point! Definitely a win for all filmmakers!

  • @JimRobinson-colors
    @JimRobinson-colors 3 месяца назад +2

    Really strange that the dropdown on the color management page you said Davinci YRGB but the mouse is selecting Davinci YRGB color managed. Maybe that was an edit? Just thought I would point it out if people were not following along.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Thank you for pointing that out! 👍🏼 it was an editing mistake for sure 😬

  • @mfjae
    @mfjae 3 месяца назад +6

    The film creator is for everyone... Both professionals and casuals alike

  • @MaximoJoshua
    @MaximoJoshua 3 месяца назад +1

    I think you could probably match them, as you have a lot more experience in Dehancer Pro...it looked to me like Dehancer Pro was warmer, and you almost had a similar look when you went to 7500 on the white balance. I didn't see a huge gap, tbh.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      That’s a great point! They look more similar probably after the RUclips compression too.

  • @GlobalShutterNY
    @GlobalShutterNY 3 месяца назад +6

    Dehancer Pro offers more control- & their grain algorithm is the best (but slow)- however for most people now I think the new built-in Film look will be enough- and the price is right!

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      That’s a great point! It’s a win for filmmakers all around.

    • @Tonellacam
      @Tonellacam 3 месяца назад +4

      the price is right because I already own resolve and almost bought demander lol

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      Haha 😆 nice! Close call!

    • @jarrodbarker
      @jarrodbarker 3 месяца назад +1

      I was just about to buy Dehancer. I’ll miss Cinestill 800 but oh well

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      @@jarrodbarker yep! Film Creator Tool is a great win for filmmakers

  • @PawFromTheBroons
    @PawFromTheBroons 3 месяца назад +4

    The music, on top of being quite repetitive, overwhelms your delivery.
    Good thing DR19 has that new Ducker feature.
    😆

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +2

      😆! Noted on the music

    • @PawFromTheBroons
      @PawFromTheBroons 3 месяца назад +2

      @@-austinsmith And for Dehancer, my view is that any plugins shouldn't cost more than the Pro software they are completing.
      Unless you make beaucoup bucks with it, it's a no go for me.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      That’s a great point!

    • @rsimko
      @rsimko 3 месяца назад +1

      test out the auto duck feature :)

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      👍🏼

  • @mryotheparagongaming7206
    @mryotheparagongaming7206 3 месяца назад

    Yow how did you do the big head effect. Tutorial please

  • @eyobmotivo6339
    @eyobmotivo6339 3 месяца назад +2

    More logical video 👍

  • @pietromelandri6834
    @pietromelandri6834 3 месяца назад +1

    Can I ask you why after you chose Rec709-A for your Output color space in the Project settings, you use Gamma2.4 in your final CST "to Rec.709" and not Rec.709-A again? Thank you

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад +1

      Yes! That’s something I’m not 100% sure on actually, I’ve tried both and have just stuck with this process as it seems to work and until I learn which one is more “correct” I’ll change it. I could be totally wrong lol. Perhaps I should be choosing rec709-a again for CST output, it makes sense for sure.

    • @pietromelandri6834
      @pietromelandri6834 3 месяца назад +1

      @@-austinsmith lol, thank you anyway Austin!!

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      No problem!

  • @fjouper
    @fjouper 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for making this video. Tip for next time. Remove music completely or lower the volume. Its distracting for me. Im not a big fan of background music in these type of videos.

  • @foksfinest6541
    @foksfinest6541 Месяц назад +1

    what you are thinks about the dehancer lite version...because the pro version is a little bit to expensive for me :(

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  Месяц назад

      While it doesn’t have everything the pro version has, It can be a great tool for getting the film look. You’ll be missing the contrast curve you get from the film print section of dehancer Pro, so you would need to set up another node in your chain for adding a good bit of contrast.

    • @foksfinest6541
      @foksfinest6541 Месяц назад +1

      Thanks..did you know ..have the lite Version any Print Option now ..i think Back in the day was No Print Option 🤔😬

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  Месяц назад

      Ohhh, I didn’t know that, thank you for the info

  • @eliaslimapro
    @eliaslimapro 3 месяца назад +3

    What already comes with DaVinci Resolve is light and Dehancer is very heavy.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Great point!

    • @Fedorevsky
      @Fedorevsky 3 месяца назад +2

      Yeah the film creator is maybe more akin to the Film convert nitrate plug in in how much resources it hogs

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Great point!

  • @ViziaFilms
    @ViziaFilms 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks, but why the annoying background music? Do you think it makes your video more exciting? Just asking

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      No problem! Thanks for the feedback!

  • @phils7108
    @phils7108 3 месяца назад +1

    comparing the Resolve Film Look Creator with Dehancer Pro is a very interesting topic right now. However I had to stop watching because of the background music. There are other channels that do such comparisons, although sometimes also with annoying background music. Maybe consider lowering the BG music?

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Thanks for the feedback 👍🏼

    • @annebokma4637
      @annebokma4637 3 месяца назад +1

      ​​@@-austinsmithI have to agree, listening on headphones and the music makes me work to hear/understand you. For the rest very well done and very interesting, just harder to stay focused (at least for me)
      I did subscribe for the content 😊

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Thank you! Noted 👍🏼

  • @Deaddinoproductions
    @Deaddinoproductions 3 месяца назад +1

    I’m sure dehancer is technically better in some ways… but you left the FLC node on a pretty bad looking grade, dialed in a completely different and better look on the dehancer node, and then concluded that dehancer looks better when you A/B’d the two. You could have at least tried to match the looks, ha.

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      That’s a great point 👍🏼

  • @PatrickSpadrille
    @PatrickSpadrille 3 месяца назад +1

    The video may be great but i couldn't stand the music way too loud.

  • @clashofideas50
    @clashofideas50 3 месяца назад +1

    I downloaded DaVinci resolve but it was 18. Something and not 19. What did I do wrong

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      try this link here forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=199322

  • @DavidKfilmmaker
    @DavidKfilmmaker 14 дней назад +1

    I’d cut that music out.

  • @andreaseinzmann6277
    @andreaseinzmann6277 3 месяца назад +1

    upload 480p on youtube? Really?

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      Check your settings. It's 4K.

  • @castielvargastv7931
    @castielvargastv7931 3 месяца назад +1

    To me the dehancer grain looks terrible. Its just to much. It makes everything look like shot with a cheap phone from 2015

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      I sometimes have to use the custom controls to thin it out

  • @warfaceindiablackburnfire330
    @warfaceindiablackburnfire330 3 месяца назад +1

    Dehancer is still supreme ❤

  • @xPocketStaff
    @xPocketStaff 3 месяца назад +1

    Dehancer is still better

    • @-austinsmith
      @-austinsmith  3 месяца назад

      It’s an awesome plug-in for sure! 👍🏼

  • @2424rocket
    @2424rocket 3 месяца назад +1

    Do you really wanna put god-awful music behind your soft voice? My advice is get rid of the music. My other advice would be… You take forever to get to the point.

  • @kisuvideo69
    @kisuvideo69 3 месяца назад +2

    lovely video ❤‍🩹❤‍🩹📈📈📈📈