I am a board-certified internal medicine physician, and you guys are taking snippets from his interviews way out of context. I am not surprised that the main stream establishment wants to silence the voices of those who have made discoveries and progress in the field of functional medicine. Shame.
Yup, they don't care about what is good for people at all.. I live within view of a convenience store where I can buy Slurpees and other junk food 24/7, the only reason BBC don't care about my ease of access to rubbish food is because it doesn't affect their power and control. When it comes to rubbish food, the BBC are all about the free market and that it's "up to the individual to decide" on what's OK and what is not OK all by themselves, but when it comes to access to information then the BBC says it should only be them..🤷
Just to check... They have an expert on who isn't being challenged by the host, to tell us we shouldn't listen to experts on podcasts who aren't challenged by the hosts?
I saw the podcast with Thomas Seyfried. He DID NOT claim that the ketogenic diet was a treatment solution without chemo. He claimed that Keto can be an ADDITIONAL treatment.
I saw all of the podcasts and the true misinformation is this video. The typical strategy of manipulators is to accuse others of their own flaws. Sad how big pharma manages to fool well intentioned media.
Neither did BBC nor the experts claimed that he did. They said that his claim could dangerously mislead cancer patients to change their diet in a way that is actually detrimental to their health during their cancer treatments. At no point anybody suggested that it would lead to patients quitting their treatments or medications.
@doodeedah6409 they literally misrepresented what he said, that he recommended keto without chemo. Dishonest, discredited BBC. Elon Musk was the first one who exposed their tactics on live TV and since then they have been down spiraling. No one cares about the lying media, people do well to listen to podcasts that interview true scientists instead of TV doctors who have never conducted more than a couple of studies, usually ripe with conflicts of interest, but are nevertheless being presented as top experts in their field. The video is a waste of time, because it will lead people to stay away from useful strategies like Keto and sugar reduction. They deal exactly the kind of harm they say those podcast speakers are dealing.
@ Keto is not cutting sugar from your diet. It’s completely starving your body from any carbs to put it into a ketosis. It’s bad enough for healthy people to do without any medical supervision, let alone someone in a poor health condition undergoing an intensive medical treatment.
Wait, about the cancer guy, he put the disclaimer several times that the keto diet is an extra to the medication! Meaning people shouldnt stop taking the medication! He wasn’t irresponsible… quite the opposite.
That may very well be the case (I have no idea), as it is not uncommon for media outlets (or anyone else, for that matter) to take things out of context for any number of reasons. And I want to point out that science denial is very real and a problem that is both far bigger and far more significant than big pharma incentives alone.
@@PeaceMatters5 heh yeah, well I think the intention is to combat misinformation but as i said earlier, it's very easy to take stuff out of context to fit a specific narrative which in their case is against the denial of science rather than science itself. It's a perfect example of just how fragile this discourse can be, right or wrong, given the alleged misrepresentation of the statements made by that cancer guy.
Omg!! Prof Thomas Seyfried is amazing. They need to go and read his research papers and visit the people who have been told to go home and die after chemo has nearly killed them and switched and followed his press pulse therapy and are alive today. Fact hyperbaric oxygen is as effective as radiation without the harmful effects. Listen to Prof Seyfried and the stats on cancer and how many people are dying. Who checks the fact checkers. So many things you can do for cancer now and chemo the last thing I would be doing. But each to their own.
This made me 100% more likely to NOT miss a Diary of a CEO episode. This video proves Steven Bartlett is doing the right thing and getting the right guests!
Agree to disagree : as a physician, I watched the entire interview and they talk about keto diet as a complimentary approach to well established therapies. They also mention that more studies on keto diet and cancer are needed to better understand whom it would benefit and whom it wouldn't. So please, don't talk about misinformation when you clearly don't seem to get someone ele's point in the first place.
Why don't you let people think for themselves? Trust in mainstream media is at an all time low. I prefer using my own discernment and research. Steven Bartlett has a good podcast.
People are allowed to think and care for themselves. What happens when things go wrong? When people have sought treatment outside so-called mainstream/ordinary treatment? Do YOU want your tax to pay for those people's condition getting worse? Exploring alternative medicine is OK but people have to accept that it can be risky and costly.
Some have more abilities than others. I know older relatives who would never question a doctor or get a 2nd opinion. I enjoy Bartlett's podcasts but remember one guest who was clearly way out there, giving no data to back up what he was saying other than quoting his colleague's medical opinions. It was disappointing because I had been very impressed with his other guests up to then. It gave me a little extra healthy skepticism and I would always research beyond a single podcast before making a change that affects my health. I have no problem with this video either if it makes people look for multiple sources to confirm information.
in a lot of cases thats a good idea but when you have guys going on that podcast that are claiming to have a cure for cancer and its not challenged, maybe think again.
Definitely an ATTACK piece. I have been doing extensive research on many of these topics for the last 10 years. The current medical establishment has based many of their dietary guidelines on the extremely flawed Ansel Keys studies from the 60's. It has been well documented the man, who wasn't a doctor by the way, cherry picked data points in order to push his biased agenda. I was able to cure my type 2 diabetes, reverse cirrhosis of the liver and had many many other health improvements by removing sugar and flour as well as ultra processed foods from my diet (just 80% of the time). But the medical establishment isn't interested in prevention and neither is big Pharma...there isn't any money to be made if we are walking around in good health and not taking any meds.
@@itsallaboutfrequency I don't remember the doctor's name - but he talked about how sugar was behind inflammation. Turned out the sugar I was consuming had infact eaten away at my bones, demineralising my knee bones. I'm only 30 year old, but I ended up with damaged knee and on wheelchair. Once I heard about the link of sugar and inflammation, I stopped all sugar, went low carb and within 1 month I started walking again after being on wheelchair for 1 year. By that time I had been to top doctors and travelled everywhere for treatment. NO WESTERN DOCTOR EVER HELPED ME! They just pushed pills on me which were temporary solutions. No one said "what were you eating that may have caused this'" they made it seem like this was unpreventable. That it hadn't happened from diet or anything I was doing wrong.
BBC do us a big favour and take this news about Steven down. The guy is doing a great job in giving us the right information unlike you. His podcasts are amazing and very informative. Cheers
Diary of a CEO has become a click bait with bombastic titles and fear-mongering quotes. He often hosts 'experts' with opposite claims back to back and never questions them. If he doesn't know enough about science and topic matter he has no place hosting a show with such wide reach. He's good at marketing and business. That's what he does. He invested in Huel and/or other health/nutrition supplements so it's all about sponsorships and promotion. He should stick to business topics or interviewing celebrities.
Do you go to a GP when you're ill? Yes? You don't have to trust BBC but do you trust this guest doctor's claims? Many people on DOACEO are not medically trained professionals.
I love diary of a CEO and the truth is sugar is bad for us. Is that not obvious?!! And what is so shocking about the thought that sugar might influence the growth of cancer cells. It seems perfectly plausible to me!!
His job is to get views and sponsorship. Stop backing up his selfish goals. If he actually cares about people he wouldn't invite quacks onto his show in the first place.
Exactly I don’t believe everything I hear from all of the guests, most people have the ability to think for themselves, I like hearing different opinions from people genuinely interested in helping people as opposed to mainstream media who are just doing the bidding of big pharma
Just goes to show his guests were right when they said Big Pharma, Big Food, and money machine institutions block the truth from people. Staying healthy, as consistently said by his multiple guests of different professions, is simpler than what media and "doctors" tell us. Diary of A Ceo is my weekly dose of much needed knowledge.
It still pays to be mindful especially since this generation seek social media to obtain power and to get paid, its a business. And those "freethinkers" that he has on that podcast are also in business, and we all know what the route to all evil is.
It's funny though I agree with you. But when the guy interviewing is selling a product like HUEL that contains stuff like SEED OIL powder in its hard to get on board with him. He's constantly being told the risks to cancers alzheimers etc yet he still invested in huel on 2020 and promotes it for health benefits. So in other words everything he is being told by these top professionals he's going against. Money talks though unfortunately. Just makes it very inconsistent and not aligned...interviewing people telling him how bad it is but he's promoting his products that have it in
And they hate it. That’s why we have such superficial non-informative reports. I mean what is this: A caution that you should do you reseach first after applying medical advice you just picked up at a podcast? Where do we live here? Is this kindergarden?
Watch the full episodes and decide for yourself. BBC just cut and show only certain parts they want. Those guests did not say anything in certainty. They used the cases they treated.
@@sydneyharbour-bridges8090and that's the crucial bit: people who don't know any better will watch clips/shorts from those shows (often not full episodes and often ignoring the disclaimers or 'theories') and will be misled by that. That's how so many parents believed that vaccines caused autism. A bad study was published AND removed with retraction. But do you think any of the parents who heard of it were aware that the scientist made up data?
What about the misinformation we receive from the health industry? In 2024, the American Heart Association stated that intermittent fasting is harmful, but many studies suggest otherwise. It’s interesting to note that the same organization promotes seed oils as beneficial, despite ongoing debates about their health effects.
@@bjulalula9537Obviously women shouldn't do it without talking to a doctor or doing a proper read (yes you have to always check if Dr doesn't stand for doctor of homeopathy).That's like w first thing anybody mentions when talking about fasting
Mmmm, BBC accuses Steven Bartlett of doing interviews but not pushing back on statements his guests make. Then BBC interviews guests and does not push back on statements their guests make. 🤔 Hello pot, kettle here!
Seriously your more worried about the BBC then the poor people following this bad advice and harming themselves.. you may need to rethink your priorities
@@stewysmithy I don't see how pointing out the hypocrisy of BBC equals caring about BBC more than people who aren't smart enough to do their own due diligence or listen to their own physicians
Great point. BBC have zero medical insight or understanding and they select a medical spokesperson who conforms to their desired story angle rather than having a balanced or informed perspective. Their own blatant bias equates misinformation, as you say, complete hypocrites.
Steve should be ashamed a grown man said to him that ‘gluten can cause autism’ and he didn’t ask ‘how is that possible, where can my audience go to see quality evidence / medical studies of this claim?’ it’s time you conspiracy theorists got a grip
@@ProfNDKai Orrrrrrr... people could ask the question 'is this backed by science and then go do some simple research themselves, there's plenty of fantastic physiologists, biochemists, internists and various other scientists running great channels with science based evidence. Why are certain elements of the medical and research field so enthusiastic about cancellation and silencing diversity in thought. I know some will be quacks and charlatans but it's individual responsibility to deal with that.
That's why they're worried people are seeking alternative sources of treatment. Can't get them addicted to pharmaceuticals if they don't want to take the advice of medical doctors. Can't make money. It's all money related. DOAC is great!
I fully believe the Diary of a CEO before I would ever believe a word BBC say they are no better than the CBC here in Canada. All government propranda. Thank God for these independent Podcasts!!!!
Professor Thomas Seyfried is an eminent cancer expert though who has published on the topic his entire career, where are the credentials of the so called “bbc experts”?
@@dimitriradoux Exactly. I came to say exactly this. There is a worrying concern around the cancer ‘industry’. Some people are making a lot of money from cancer donations and are not making any headway in their science. Prof. Seyfried is brave enough to call this out. And you get the BBC who are supposed to be the pinnacle of excellence in journalism!! It makes you wonder who is controlling the bbc narrative??
Why is the BBC going after this guy? Is it because more people watch his program worldwide, rather than any of their programs combined? Or is this the thinly veiled racism they're notorious for?
They're scared of the podcast revolution, and the fact that they're no longer able to control the narrative. All of the dinosaur corporate media networks are dying. Thank goodness.
You’re easily manipulated if you think you believe what you just wrote. You’re not in a position to assess accuracy on many of these topics. Everyone needs to sharpen our critical-thinking skills and increase our skepticism.
@@Wee162It’s a humorous opinion that I think is pretty accurate. However, you make a great point. I choose to trust people are trying to tell the truth, but is my individual responsibility to validate it. The disconcerting thing is when moneyed interest profit from misinformation. Follow the Money. Ethics matter and destroying a person’s character is all too common. Are we promoting dialogue and understanding or disagreement and conflict?
@@bluzbrotheryou just said it. moneyed interest. which is exactly what motivates these online grifters like bartlett. the thing is, you can validate ans confirm what your doctor is saying. you cant with a grifter who says "the corperations are greedy hence EVERY medical advancement is also shady" which is a tell tail sign of a con artist. dialogue is talking, discussing and rebutting wrong information. what bartlett does is the antithesis to this
The reason this is happening is because the Western Medicine system has greatly let us down, and there really is no one-size-fits-all path to healing for everyone. It's a personal journey. Let people take theirs.
@@cindytartt4048 Lol, the science underpinning the stories here was first discovered in the 1920's and consistently researched and written up since. If you weren't an ignorant troll - and had read a book -you would know that
As someone who healed her infertility by dropping cow milk and completely avoiding sugar and processed/ultra-processed foods and not losing a pound back in 2019 I absolutely need the info brought by the experts Stephen. He has brought on his channel experts in: healthy food, sugar addiction, PCOS, infertility, metabolism, chemicals and micro plastics, all the experts (especially the female ones) that I wish I had when I was going through puberty. Instead when I was a teenager I had Cosmopolitan magazine and maybe some outdated encyclopedias, and not a whole lot from the dial up internet days but nothing helped until I met my partners family and they suggested I switch to plant based milk, and this helped cure my acne completely. Life got better as time went on but in the last couple years (2023-2024) wow so much info on women’s health and I haven’t felt more cared about by my “village” in ever. When I was growing up I was put on birth control at 13 and this helped mask my cow milk intolerance which was causing my acne. I further learned in my mid 30s after quitting birth control I didn’t have consistent periods because of PCOS, so by quitting sugar I healed my infertility and my cycles became consistent and I was ovulating. Had two kids, 14 months apart at 39-40 years old when my fertility should have been in the tank apparently but if I wasn’t ovulating for my entire teens and 20s and early 30s maybe my eggs were not being released? No idea but both our kids are doing well. Thanks Stephen and guests for helping me understand my body better and heal further by understanding PCOS and the connection to diabetes and the metabolism issue. This knowledge will help me give my kids a better chance to survive our nutrition desert through avoiding the chemicals in plastics as much as possible and choosing organic whole foods (grown from our own garden space).
Professor Thomas Seyfried is actually 1 of the 5 top word-authorities on cancer metabolism and cancer biology so the BBC should shut their mouths on this subject.
Absolutely. And btw - did Steven at any point say anything like: „Pls aply any medical advice you pick up in this podcast mindlessly without double checking any information we debate here“? No? I didn‘t think so either.
We DONT NEED your investigation. We know the truth. My close relative died because of chemo. His organs got literally fried. His veins became rock hard and couldn’t receive any treatment afterwords. Doctors insisted for him to get more chemo which finished him.
Dr Thomas Seyfried said that our ancestors haven't had any cancer because they hadn't had any sugary foods to eat back then, which is totally wrong. Scientists have found out that our ancestors had all sorts of cancer, too. Even dinosaurs had cancer. Sugar does contribute to cancer, even though it isn't the only factor benefiting it. That's the kind of misinformation we're dealing with. Cheers
I watched that particular podcast and it was one of the most important and informative cancer related podcasts I’ve seen… sugar and highly processed foods are a major factor in the growth of cancer related diseases… the podcast did not rule out the use of radio therapy but it did say extreme uses of the therapy can in some cases do far more harm than good. Diet needs to play an important part when treating patients with cancer and the need to stop feeding or fueling cancer cells needs to be part of the treatment. Just because something doesn’t fit into the model of what we have learned over decades does not make it wrong and much of these so called treatments are backed by corporates who put profits before cure…. The BBC should know better and the need to look at both sides of the equation before demonising a topic without first understanding what it is saying and reading between the lines. Stephens podcasts are there to be listened to with an open and unbiased mind. He’s not there to challenge what his guests are saying as his guests are vetted before the show but where possible get another perspective and ask questions the ordinary person may not be able to ask.
Good on you Steven, we love you - clearly you are doing the right thing. Oh wait, I need to breathe some air, but let me call my doctor first to see if it is safe. Ridiculous! Our eyes are open, we know where truth lies. Stay brave Steven, don't let anyone bring you down.
its very ignorant for bbc to assume that all cancer patients have treatment options. I live in a small town with no specialist for my type of cancer and other complications that doctors won't touch because I have a cancer diagnosis and no one wants to be a liability for spreading the cancer, etc.. so they've basically left me to die with a very large tumor that I lug around and it makes my life very very difficult and seems hopeless but the information about a keto diet being able to starve cancer gives someone like me hope and a path to self treatment.. something I can do.. something I can try when no one is offering me anything else..
Diary of a CEO is one of my FAVORITE RUclips channel and I trust his channel over ANY main stream media channel. Let us think for ourselves! We are sovereign smart and strong human beings!
I LOVE Steven Bartlett's podcast! Sounds like Big pharma are frightened they'll lose money. Chemotherapy isn't right for everyone. Every cancer patient has the right to choose the type of treatment THEY want!! Steven isn't misleading or forcing anyone to do anything.
😂If BBC or MSM ever says that something is a harmful or misinformation, that is what I want as it's a lead to the right information. Thanks for letting me as a new subscriber to this podcast.
yes. A threat to the big pharma control matrix. THEY need YOU to believe their bullshit. And state controlled media such as BBC are well and truly part of that matrix
BBC have a good track record of correcting any misinformation they put out there, maybe not a well as their initial statements but they do try. This is the whole point of journalism is to hold each other accountable for the publics benefit.
@@poppinpussiesAfter the Southport trial the truth will be revealed and it's going to really hit the fan for the BBC and the Government. MPs aren't allowed to discuss it at the moment but it isn't going to go away.
@@sebastianguerre6868 I mean that’s a huge assumption itself, while in the super rare case that could be true, I’ve yet to see most conspiracies challenged and proven right. Especially within health claims. Don’t you remember the lockdown? Remember how many pieces of misinformation or conspiracies were floating around? While I don’t always doubt that some conspiracies can be true, particularly amongst political leaders, I think it’s more true for “alternative medicines” to be as much of a conspiracy too, I just don’t see any value or point to turning scientific medical studies into conspiracies unless you have stakes making profit within this for yourself. It’s a little but hypocritical to not question your own views when talking about conspiracy, it’s the fundamental value in seeking the truth.
Thank God for Steven Bartlett's podcast. His guests, especially on Diet and Medicine have change my life and the lives of my family as well. Keep doing what you are Steven. We depend on you. NOT THE BBC.
BBCsaid that his claim could dangerously mislead cancer patients to change their diet in a way that is actually detrimental to their health during their cancer treatments.
@@SueMaha21 what is also true is that he sells a product that contains sugars, fillers, seed oils aka HUEL DRINKS causing inflammation and potential disease. Crazy to think he interviews people telling him and others to avoid these things yet he invests and promotes something with it all in🤣...a little mis alignment and contradicts on my opinion. Would love to hear his thoughts on this
@@SueMaha21 that's not discrediting his podcast either as I think it's great but he doesn't follow through with it himself. Not sure about you but being a decent person I wouldn't be advocating and interviewing people trying to help then going against it by sling products with that stuff in. In one sense he's helping via the podcast and in another he is poisoning people with a product full of toxic inflammatory ingredients jusy doesnt make sense🤷🏼♂️
@@garysaunders1546doesn’t have to. He is not doing the podcasts to promote his product. I respect him more for that. I would never buy Huel, but I enjoy his podcasts.
Delighted that the BBC has brought Stephen Bartlett to the attention of many more people so they too get to understand the real possibilities to creating health. Great work BBC, keep it up! Also encouraging are the comments here that really demonstrate that people are recognising what is truth. 🎉
After Healing myself from stage 3 cancer without conventional treatment I'll be continuing to listen to the real truth.. podcast like these are saving people's live
So based on what she’s saying people shouldn’t cut out or reduce sugar from their diets? That goes against every Oncologist’s advice & Cancer Research UK
When my elderly father was hospitalized he was fed a very high fructose and sucrose diet, even though he was diabetic. Then, as his blood sugar shot up they’d inject him with insulin. At some point, we started refusing their “food” instead providing dad with healthier alternatives with a similar protein and vitamin profile. The hospital could then gradually ween him off the injections. They had no objections. It’s simply that they don’t have funds for healthy food, only for meds.
The truth of the matter is that encouraging someone to improve their diet is seen as a potential harm to them whist pushing chemotherapy as the only option , regardless of the outcome is considered fine. Why don’t they start by stating what causes such huge increase in cancer? Question to which apparently they don’t have a concrete answer to. Or avalanche of autoimmune diseases? Treating the cause is the core of solution.
Let's not hold our breath waiting for that.. Its shocking and uncomfortable to consider what the BBC is accountable for (and that's only the stuff we know about) Here they are just showing exactly the kind of priorities they have, while attempting to present it as some genuine concern for public health..
Disappointing article from BBC. This podcast is giving alternative options. People should be able to think for themselves. Don’t assume people are stupid.
His podcast is my favorite! He is the best host ever for not talking too much and dialing back his own ego in these conversations. Perhaps his episodes are best watched by curious but critical minds. If you plan to change your life based on what one person says in one episode, maybe do some further research beforehand. That's on you! We need shows like DOC
Dr Setfried (the cancer guy) is not JUST a guest. He’s been doing years of research into cancer. Thomas N. Seyfried (born 1946[1]) is an American professor of biology, genetics, and biochemistry at Boston College. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 1976. His postdoctoral fellowship studies were in the Department of Neurology at the Yale University School of Medicine where he served as an assistant professor in neurology. He did undergraduate work at the University of New England, formerly St. Francis College, and received a master's degree in genetics from Illinois State University, Normal.
@@mbrylewski Not the point. The BBC programme making a point about not trusting guests who aren't qualified just some random thing on the internet, that they should see their doctor. But this guy is eminently qualified to make statements regarding health and based on experience. No it doesn't mean he's right but he deserves to be listened to.
If you watched the entire episode you will remember that this doctor also admitted to Steven that he doesn't follow his own advice. I like Steven's podcast but the one with Dr. Seyfried can be skipped.
Reading through the comments it is obvious that the kind of people who would watch/listen to diary of a CEO in the first place would never believe BS "news" like this anyway
You would get healthier by taking that time and simply going to the gym or a walk. I'll sum up most of the content for you, eat healthy, be active, live longer.
@@jaxr2958 Aaah, but there's a nuance as you get older. Your body will very likely get insulin-resistant, you will put on visceral fat, especially in the liver and your baseline inflammation levels will tend to rise. If you are like 80% of UK citizens who are obese, or 15% with T2 diabetes or pre diabetes etc etc you need advice _how_ to eat to be healthier.
@@djanitatiana His podcasts can be 2.5 hours long. That's a lot of procrastination packaged with bit of advice on how to eat healthier. My point, get 2.5 hours exercise instead and I'd bet 99% of people would be better off.
My wife had stage 3 colorectal cancer. Changed diet under advice and instruction from a medical professional who had stopped being part of the mainstream system due to the power and control of drugs companies. We did this path as a friend had cured her cancer by the same professional. The main thing i got was the individual approach and to work with the patients beliefs.
@@bunnyliberationfront No Sugar. No seed oils,(butter and Extra virgin olive oil) No Grains. The idea is to reduce the inflammation and acidity. Intermittent fasting to help the body to repair. Keep it simple. Seasonal food, No Food from the Nightshade family(tomatoes, potatoes,peppers) Eat Wild meat like venison, Fish eggs etc
@@acex222 No pay, Just a Human who likes to share their experiences with others so they maybe able to make decisions that are beneficial to us as a species, Like we have since we first became Humans
If it entertains you, It doesn't mean It's fully responsibly curated content. There's a dangerous precedent set, when you're projecting information that could actually be wrong (especially if other subject matter content comes across as educated, or is factual).
It is a journalism podcast whether he likes it or not and he needs to be responsible with who he invites over, as he is essentially providing them a huge platform to spread whatever they want
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Each person is responsible for their own healthcare. If it wasn’t for You Tube I would still be suffering from Hashimoto’s. Thank you Diary of a CEO. You’re helping people help themselves.
I think the biggest claims she’s made here: 60 second advice people are taking. No they’re doing research. Sugar does contribute to a lot of conditions that can amplify cancer cutting sugar out should always be the first thing you do. The doctors they mentioned aren’t selling supplements they’re providing some useful info. Do proper research
This worries me about the authenticity of BBC now. I've seen that episode and at no point does he simplify it to just cutting out sugar, and juicing. He also doesn't advocate that you don't do chemo, he just tells you that it is in fact harmful (that's why it works so you can't really deny that fact). He also doesn't push ANY supplements or pills. In fact he encourages more study of the subject based off of what his studies show. He wants REAL scientists and Dr's to look at what he's saying from a point of understanding not simply refuting because your peers say don't look at the data. I have never be on the level of a conspiracy theorist but this is giving me MAJOR cover-up vibes.... and BTW he LITERALLY said the same thing this DR said in that there isn't a magic bullet to cure cancer which is more proof that you either didn't listen to the podcast or are deliberately omitting or cherry picking what you want from it. This is real clownery frfr. Yall think we all stupid huh.
The authenticity of the BBC went out the window decades ago. Nobody pays any attention to this controlled organisation except the older generations and those without the ability to discern. The irony here is hilarious. The BBC actually claiming someone is pushing health misinformation! Globalist Shills.
What the f is he even doing talking about it. He's not a doctor, if he has no experience in health care he has no business discussing it in any kind of factual manner.
They are commenting on the guests he brings on the show, not what Steven says himself. You are doing the cherry picking yourself here. Not sure why you would separate his guests on his podcasts as “real doctors” vs the rest of the drs who do not appear on his show as if they quantify legitimacy 🤷. If you watched this new clip they even quote that Steven’s company spoke out saying they don’t always agree with the guests but the point is that they bring on many views. The issue what the bbc have with him is that he fails to question the problematic views on his podcasts, and sadly people don’t always listen to context but prefer soundbites that can be inherently misleading on their own without context, thus promoting the spread of misinformation. Honestly, I think you need to rewatch this news clip again because I think you failed to grasp context here too.
😂😂😂 yes the bbc definitely knows better 😩 as if I’m taking any notice from the bbc about health care,the same people who told us the vaccine was good for us,keep up the good work Stephen
You're not thinking. Come on we can't let these thoughts spread. Don't you remember all the misinformation during COVID. ( Just wanted to see how you'd handle an alternative view lol)
You can go and enjoy your click bait. Person [B], who is more vulnerable and doesn't tune into the possibility It's 'alternate' views, may actually do some harm to themselves. You don't have to consider that though, right?
Another example of desperate BBC grasping at straws to try and bring down their competition. Podcasts are more popular and more trusted than the BBC by far now.
The comment section is pretty much passing the vibe check ❤ I love how they thought they were going to tear him down but his community is spamming with ❤❤ for SB I concur button --->
I am a board-certified internal medicine physician, and you guys are taking snippets from his interviews way out of context. I am not surprised that the main stream establishment wants to silence the voices of those who have made discoveries and progress in the field of functional medicine. Shame.
thank you for stating that.
Thank you for this comment!
Mate if you are a physician go on record and tell us keto reverses cancer. You wouldn’t dare.
Please share your profile page
What works ?
BBC are the last people who should be talking about misinformation.
Russian bot
An exaggeration. BBC’s claim here is still valid even if you grant your point.
Facts!
Yup, they don't care about what is good for people at all.. I live within view of a convenience store where I can buy Slurpees and other junk food 24/7, the only reason BBC don't care about my ease of access to rubbish food is because it doesn't affect their power and control. When it comes to rubbish food, the BBC are all about the free market and that it's "up to the individual to decide" on what's OK and what is not OK all by themselves, but when it comes to access to information then the BBC says it should only be them..🤷
@@okay4403 nope. A liar calling a liar a liar is still a liar. In this case these liars also cover for pedophiles
This BBC video is one of the reasons WHY we need Diary of a CEO
Any MSM and any "alt media morphing into MSM" is the reason why we need DoCEO and others.
💯 he interviews experts! Not BBC buddies
@@amandawilliams3270no he doesn’t … it’s Joe Rogan all over again. Such a shame to see him way
You people truly are dense. @@amandawilliams3270
EXACTLY!
When the BBC says it's misinformation, you know that these information are likely to be valuable.
The BBC should make a program about itself spreading medical misinformation
😂
Correct
Just to check... They have an expert on who isn't being challenged by the host, to tell us we shouldn't listen to experts on podcasts who aren't challenged by the hosts?
Very good point.
This guy gets it. Rule for one but not for the other. Welcome to the demise of legacy media.
and did BBC fact check her? Ive seen her... some people comment she is misleading on her channel!
@Orangina345 fact checking 😅 wake up
Bingo.
I saw the podcast with Thomas Seyfried. He DID NOT claim that the ketogenic diet was a treatment solution without chemo. He claimed that Keto can be an ADDITIONAL treatment.
I saw all of the podcasts and the true misinformation is this video. The typical strategy of manipulators is to accuse others of their own flaws. Sad how big pharma manages to fool well intentioned media.
Neither did BBC nor the experts claimed that he did. They said that his claim could dangerously mislead cancer patients to change their diet in a way that is actually detrimental to their health during their cancer treatments.
At no point anybody suggested that it would lead to patients quitting their treatments or medications.
@doodeedah6409 they literally misrepresented what he said, that he recommended keto without chemo. Dishonest, discredited BBC. Elon Musk was the first one who exposed their tactics on live TV and since then they have been down spiraling. No one cares about the lying media, people do well to listen to podcasts that interview true scientists instead of TV doctors who have never conducted more than a couple of studies, usually ripe with conflicts of interest, but are nevertheless being presented as top experts in their field. The video is a waste of time, because it will lead people to stay away from useful strategies like Keto and sugar reduction. They deal exactly the kind of harm they say those podcast speakers are dealing.
Sure because cutting sugar out of your diet is going to harm you... get real. Sounds like somebody sponsored by one of the big cereal companies.
@ Keto is not cutting sugar from your diet. It’s completely starving your body from any carbs to put it into a ketosis.
It’s bad enough for healthy people to do without any medical supervision, let alone someone in a poor health condition undergoing an intensive medical treatment.
Free speech is not their right to take. Allow people to ask questions and think on their own.
its not about free speech and taking peoples rights away, its about spreading misinformation which a lof of CEO's do
Absolutely 💯
The issue is he presents these people as experts and their opinions as fact
Wait, about the cancer guy, he put the disclaimer several times that the keto diet is an extra to the medication! Meaning people shouldnt stop taking the medication!
He wasn’t irresponsible… quite the opposite.
That may very well be the case (I have no idea), as it is not uncommon for media outlets (or anyone else, for that matter) to take things out of context for any number of reasons. And I want to point out that science denial is very real and a problem that is both far bigger and far more significant than big pharma incentives alone.
@@lh8228 what? Are you real?
BBC spreading misinformation in a news update about misinformation? 😂
@@PeaceMatters5 heh yeah, well I think the intention is to combat misinformation but as i said earlier, it's very easy to take stuff out of context to fit a specific narrative which in their case is against the denial of science rather than science itself. It's a perfect example of just how fragile this discourse can be, right or wrong, given the alleged misrepresentation of the statements made by that cancer guy.
Omg!! Prof Thomas Seyfried is amazing. They need to go and read his research papers and visit the people who have been told to go home and die after chemo has nearly killed them and switched and followed his press pulse therapy and are alive today. Fact hyperbaric oxygen is as effective as radiation without the harmful effects. Listen to Prof Seyfried and the stats on cancer and how many people are dying. Who checks the fact checkers. So many things you can do for cancer now and chemo the last thing I would be doing. But each to their own.
This is just prove that the man and his podcast are making a positive difference! Thank you BBC for confirming that!
For real
That's exactly right 👍🏿
👀
🤡
Totally agree
This made me 100% more likely to NOT miss a Diary of a CEO episode. This video proves Steven Bartlett is doing the right thing and getting the right guests!
Are you nuts ?
Another brainwashed internet consumer.
Definitely a paid for comment 😂
agree - people can make up their own minds - why BBC have to condemn / smear people huh? BECAUSE BIG PHARMA IS PULLING BBC STRINGS.
Lol you're an idiot
Agree to disagree : as a physician, I watched the entire interview and they talk about keto diet as a complimentary approach to well established therapies. They also mention that more studies on keto diet and cancer are needed to better understand whom it would benefit and whom it wouldn't. So please, don't talk about misinformation when you clearly don't seem to get someone ele's point in the first place.
Thank you BBC for advertising Stephen bartlet. Thanks to you, I am now subscribed to his channel
That's your problem. At least BBC has saved so much people from those guests on his show
me too
fact checked. 🤣
Honestly.. You live in a bubble. If you don't see the bias of the BBC and it's woke, propaganda agendas@@ka65571
You're too "smart"
Why don't you let people think for themselves? Trust in mainstream media is at an all time low. I prefer using my own discernment and research. Steven Bartlett has a good podcast.
Because
BBC = MAFIA , GARBAGE, CRIMINALS, CROCKED, COMMUNUST, DEATH IDEOLOGY PROPAGANDISTIC ARM
Because not everyone has the medical knowledge and understanding to critically assess the misinformation he's peddling.
People are allowed to think and care for themselves. What happens when things go wrong? When people have sought treatment outside so-called mainstream/ordinary treatment? Do YOU want your tax to pay for those people's condition getting worse? Exploring alternative medicine is OK but people have to accept that it can be risky and costly.
Part of the problem is exactly that, people thinking for themselves 😂
Some have more abilities than others. I know older relatives who would never question a doctor or get a 2nd opinion. I enjoy Bartlett's podcasts but remember one guest who was clearly way out there, giving no data to back up what he was saying other than quoting his colleague's medical opinions. It was disappointing because I had been very impressed with his other guests up to then. It gave me a little extra healthy skepticism and I would always research beyond a single podcast before making a change that affects my health.
I have no problem with this video either if it makes people look for multiple sources to confirm information.
As a rule I start to pay attention to those the BBC try to cancel 👍
in a lot of cases thats a good idea but when you have guys going on that podcast that are claiming to have a cure for cancer and its not challenged, maybe think again.
In this case you would be an idiot
pay attention to what is important. smoke screen
🙌 yes
Yes, exactly. Their strategy has the opposite effect. A bit of reverse psychology.
Definitely an ATTACK piece. I have been doing extensive research on many of these topics for the last 10 years. The current medical establishment has based many of their dietary guidelines on the extremely flawed Ansel Keys studies from the 60's. It has been well documented the man, who wasn't a doctor by the way, cherry picked data points in order to push his biased agenda. I was able to cure my type 2 diabetes, reverse cirrhosis of the liver and had many many other health improvements by removing sugar and flour as well as ultra processed foods from my diet (just 80% of the time). But the medical establishment isn't interested in prevention and neither is big Pharma...there isn't any money to be made if we are walking around in good health and not taking any meds.
Steven Bartletts Podcast literally changed my life for the better
Same
lol
It frikin got me out of a wheelchair!!!
@@ElectricBlanket1122 ❤ so delighted for you. Was there one podcast that really resonated with you that enabled you to heal ?
@@itsallaboutfrequency I don't remember the doctor's name - but he talked about how sugar was behind inflammation. Turned out the sugar I was consuming had infact eaten away at my bones, demineralising my knee bones. I'm only 30 year old, but I ended up with damaged knee and on wheelchair. Once I heard about the link of sugar and inflammation, I stopped all sugar, went low carb and within 1 month I started walking again after being on wheelchair for 1 year.
By that time I had been to top doctors and travelled everywhere for treatment. NO WESTERN DOCTOR EVER HELPED ME! They just pushed pills on me which were temporary solutions. No one said "what were you eating that may have caused this'" they made it seem like this was unpreventable. That it hadn't happened from diet or anything I was doing wrong.
BBC do us a big favour and take this news about Steven down. The guy is doing a great job in giving us the right information unlike you. His podcasts are amazing and very informative. Cheers
"All news is good news" this is how they push disinfo.
Art of war.
Steven been paid off long ago
They should just close up their disgusting propaganda terrorist network
Love the fact the BBC are claiming that any narrative that goes against big pharma is “misinformation” 😂😂😂 You literally couldn’t make it up !!!
Is the BBC completely unaware of the name of the company which received the biggest corporate fine in history and the reason for that fine?
Thank god everyone here is on the same page! Their days are numbered, this BS won't last long now.
They’re really controlling about wanting people to “live” 😂 god forbid anyone dies, cos that’s not allowed.
Diary of a CEO has become a click bait with bombastic titles and fear-mongering quotes. He often hosts 'experts' with opposite claims back to back and never questions them.
If he doesn't know enough about science and topic matter he has no place hosting a show with such wide reach.
He's good at marketing and business. That's what he does. He invested in Huel and/or other health/nutrition supplements so it's all about sponsorships and promotion. He should stick to business topics or interviewing celebrities.
Do you go to a GP when you're ill? Yes?
You don't have to trust BBC but do you trust this guest doctor's claims? Many people on DOACEO are not medically trained professionals.
I love diary of a CEO and the truth is sugar is bad for us. Is that not obvious?!! And what is so shocking about the thought that sugar might influence the growth of cancer cells. It seems perfectly plausible to me!!
He's a podcast host not a doctor. His job is to ask questions and listen.
You're right. And that is just what he did!
Wrong.....he job is to also challenge wrong information
His job is to get views and sponsorship
His job is to get views and sponsorship. Stop backing up his selfish goals. If he actually cares about people he wouldn't invite quacks onto his show in the first place.
Exactly I don’t believe everything I hear from all of the guests, most people have the ability to think for themselves, I like hearing different opinions from people genuinely interested in helping people as opposed to mainstream media who are just doing the bidding of big pharma
Just goes to show his guests were right when they said Big Pharma, Big Food, and money machine institutions block the truth from people. Staying healthy, as consistently said by his multiple guests of different professions, is simpler than what media and "doctors" tell us. Diary of A Ceo is my weekly dose of much needed knowledge.
It still pays to be mindful especially since this generation seek social media to obtain power and to get paid, its a business. And those "freethinkers" that he has on that podcast are also in business, and we all know what the route to all evil is.
I sincerely hope you don't ever get ME or cancer then.
If you want reliable information, try Layne Norton for exemple. He debunks a lot of it.
It's funny though I agree with you. But when the guy interviewing is selling a product like HUEL that contains stuff like SEED OIL powder in its hard to get on board with him. He's constantly being told the risks to cancers alzheimers etc yet he still invested in huel on 2020 and promotes it for health benefits. So in other words everything he is being told by these top professionals he's going against.
Money talks though unfortunately. Just makes it very inconsistent and not aligned...interviewing people telling him how bad it is but he's promoting his products that have it in
And they hate it. That’s why we have such superficial non-informative reports. I mean what is this: A caution that you should do you reseach first after applying medical advice you just picked up at a podcast?
Where do we live here? Is this kindergarden?
Watch the full episodes and decide for yourself. BBC just cut and show only certain parts they want. Those guests did not say anything in certainty. They used the cases they treated.
It’s not truly possible to ‘decide for yourself’ if you know nothing about the field being addressed
So basically they're not experts.
@@sydneyharbour-bridges8090and that's the crucial bit: people who don't know any better will watch clips/shorts from those shows (often not full episodes and often ignoring the disclaimers or 'theories') and will be misled by that. That's how so many parents believed that vaccines caused autism. A bad study was published AND removed with retraction. But do you think any of the parents who heard of it were aware that the scientist made up data?
@sydneyharbour-bridges8090 then educate yourself. Still doesent justify being babied by the state.
@@ImpureForceno they are experts in their field successfully treating patients 🙄
What about the misinformation we receive from the health industry? In 2024, the American Heart Association stated that intermittent fasting is harmful, but many studies suggest otherwise. It’s interesting to note that the same organization promotes seed oils as beneficial, despite ongoing debates about their health effects.
Intermittent fasting can be harmful to some, esp. Women. So it is equally wrong to say it is bad as to say it is good
@@bjulalula9537Obviously women shouldn't do it without talking to a doctor or doing a proper read (yes you have to always check if Dr doesn't stand for doctor of homeopathy).That's like w first thing anybody mentions when talking about fasting
There is no money in prescribing intermittent fasting 😉
Mmmm, BBC accuses Steven Bartlett of doing interviews but not pushing back on statements his guests make.
Then BBC interviews guests and does not push back on statements their guests make. 🤔 Hello pot, kettle here!
💯💯💯👏👏👏👏👏
Seriously your more worried about the BBC then the poor people following this bad advice and harming themselves.. you may need to rethink your priorities
@@stewysmithy I don't see how pointing out the hypocrisy of BBC equals caring about BBC more than people who aren't smart enough to do their own due diligence or listen to their own physicians
Let's talk about the elephant in the room here- racism.
Great point. BBC have zero medical insight or understanding and they select a medical spokesperson who conforms to their desired story angle rather than having a balanced or informed perspective. Their own blatant bias equates misinformation, as you say, complete hypocrites.
This is irresponsible journalism at its finest. You should be ashamed, BBC.
Steve should be ashamed a grown man said to him that ‘gluten can cause autism’ and he didn’t ask ‘how is that possible, where can my audience go to see quality evidence / medical studies of this claim?’ it’s time you conspiracy theorists got a grip
@@ProfNDKai suggestion: put gluten+autism in google scholar...
suggestion for research on google scholar: gluten+autism
That is if BBC know what shame means!
@@ProfNDKai Orrrrrrr... people could ask the question 'is this backed by science and then go do some simple research themselves, there's plenty of fantastic physiologists, biochemists, internists and various other scientists running great channels with science based evidence. Why are certain elements of the medical and research field so enthusiastic about cancellation and silencing diversity in thought. I know some will be quacks and charlatans but it's individual responsibility to deal with that.
Get it straight, money is more important than patient health.
That's why they're worried people are seeking alternative sources of treatment. Can't get them addicted to pharmaceuticals if they don't want to take the advice of medical doctors. Can't make money. It's all money related. DOAC is great!
❤
To Big Pharma... Definitely
PROPS - Yeps, and we've just seen how the results of that has PLAYED OUT IN THE NEWS this past month!
Profits over people - smdh...
Bartlett is all about making money by promoting idiots who want to sell a book or a course for money.
They absolutely don't care about your wellbeing
I fully believe the Diary of a CEO before I would ever believe a word BBC say they are no better than the CBC here in Canada. All government propranda. Thank God for these independent Podcasts!!!!
Professor Thomas Seyfried is an eminent cancer expert though who has published on the topic his entire career, where are the credentials of the so called “bbc experts”?
ruclips.net/video/96hu4p98T20/видео.html seems like some other Doctor's agree.
@@dimitriradoux Exactly. I came to say exactly this. There is a worrying concern around the cancer ‘industry’. Some people are making a lot of money from cancer donations and are not making any headway in their science. Prof. Seyfried is brave enough to call this out. And you get the BBC who are supposed to be the pinnacle of excellence in journalism!! It makes you wonder who is controlling the bbc narrative??
Wikipedia 😂
Those experts looks alike bags stuffed with dollars from big pharma.
Why is the BBC going after this guy? Is it because more people watch his program worldwide, rather than any of their programs combined? Or is this the thinly veiled racism they're notorious for?
I guess he brought more viewers to BBC channel than ever 🤣….
Because they aren't in control of the information you're fed anymore
They're scared of the podcast revolution, and the fact that they're no longer able to control the narrative. All of the dinosaur corporate media networks are dying. Thank goodness.
BBC - a media puppet.
puppet master = the mysterious "they".
The elite. The great corporate / government WALL.
yes, BBC is probably jealous, Steven Bartlett has too much influence
His podcast is more informative and accurate than BBC, CNN, and FOX altogether
You’re easily manipulated if you think you believe what you just wrote. You’re not in a position to assess accuracy on many of these topics. Everyone needs to sharpen our critical-thinking skills and increase our skepticism.
@@Wee162It’s a humorous opinion that I think is pretty accurate. However, you make a great point. I choose to trust people are trying to tell the truth, but is my individual responsibility to validate it. The disconcerting thing is when moneyed interest profit from misinformation. Follow the Money. Ethics matter and destroying a person’s character is all too common. Are we promoting dialogue and understanding or disagreement and conflict?
@@bluzbrotheryou just said it. moneyed interest.
which is exactly what motivates these online grifters like bartlett.
the thing is, you can validate ans confirm what your doctor is saying.
you cant with a grifter who says "the corperations are greedy hence EVERY medical advancement is also shady" which is a tell tail sign of a con artist.
dialogue is talking, discussing and rebutting wrong information.
what bartlett does is the antithesis to this
@@Wee162just like you were easily convinced about the safety of the clot shot
@@Winston-lf7sband what motivates the big pharma shills?
It was about time for the mass media to do this…so predictable. Not surprised, but still disgusted.
The reason this is happening is because the Western Medicine system has greatly let us down, and there really is no one-size-fits-all path to healing for everyone. It's a personal journey. Let people take theirs.
Yeah. There is always problems with everything. But come on. Let people choose whatever they want. But that doesn’t mean overt misinformation helps.
@cadmantheaviator yeah the BBC need to stop with this perpetual misinformation. People see right through it now.
God forbid people use their own critical thinking skills and make their own minds up. BBC is such an embarrassment.
They're not making their minds up if they're listening to the grifters he has on!
@@lazylurker2842ha ha, hardly.
BBC Expert: he uses scary click bait titles - BBC procedes to use scary click bait title.
He’s upsetting the establishment, that’s how we know he’s onto something
I love the fact that so many people have woken up to the truth and no amount of lies can work on them anymore. ❤
Yes, good for you. He and his guests are liars.
Except I think that’s not what you meant somehow. Next time, open a book, not a snotcast.
You daft bot 🤖 😂
Some are still asleep but more and more are waking up.
Agreed
@@cindytartt4048 Lol, the science underpinning the stories here was first discovered in the 1920's and consistently researched and written up since. If you weren't an ignorant troll - and had read a book -you would know that
Stephen Bartlett should be applauded for sharing much needed health info from innovators that mainstream medicine (and media) are sadly ignoring.
Yes!
As someone who healed her infertility by dropping cow milk and completely avoiding sugar and processed/ultra-processed foods and not losing a pound back in 2019 I absolutely need the info brought by the experts Stephen. He has brought on his channel experts in: healthy food, sugar addiction, PCOS, infertility, metabolism, chemicals and micro plastics, all the experts (especially the female ones) that I wish I had when I was going through puberty. Instead when I was a teenager I had Cosmopolitan magazine and maybe some outdated encyclopedias, and not a whole lot from the dial up internet days but nothing helped until I met my partners family and they suggested I switch to plant based milk, and this helped cure my acne completely. Life got better as time went on but in the last couple years (2023-2024) wow so much info on women’s health and I haven’t felt more cared about by my “village” in ever. When I was growing up I was put on birth control at 13 and this helped mask my cow milk intolerance which was causing my acne. I further learned in my mid 30s after quitting birth control I didn’t have consistent periods because of PCOS, so by quitting sugar I healed my infertility and my cycles became consistent and I was ovulating. Had two kids, 14 months apart at 39-40 years old when my fertility should have been in the tank apparently but if I wasn’t ovulating for my entire teens and 20s and early 30s maybe my eggs were not being released? No idea but both our kids are doing well.
Thanks Stephen and guests for helping me understand my body better and heal further by understanding PCOS and the connection to diabetes and the metabolism issue. This knowledge will help me give my kids a better chance to survive our nutrition desert through avoiding the chemicals in plastics as much as possible and choosing organic whole foods (grown from our own garden space).
You know what they call alternative medicine that works
Medicine
You know what is alternative medicine that works?
Medicine.
The Ministry of truth.....
Professor Thomas Seyfried is actually 1 of the 5 top word-authorities on cancer metabolism and cancer biology so the BBC should shut their mouths on this subject.
Exactly, he is the opposite of a quack.
Anyone recommending keto
For anything
Is not an authority on anything lol
Reverse psychology psy op
Agreed!!
Hmmm.... I wonder which pharmaceutical/medical company 'paid' BBC to have this story done...
The nerve of the BBC to accuse somebody else of spreading medical misinformation 😂
💯
Ok look an anti-vaxxer flat earther. Why don't you qualify your point?
Grab the popcorn the fight begins xD
@@knockedoutloaded ikr ! They are finished and they know it. Not holding back anymore. Their control over all the narratives is dwindling
The accusations are valid.
Why go after Steven instead of the experts making the statements? Steven is not an expert that’s why he has these experts.
Cant believe ppl be asking shit like that
I trust Diary of CEO before BBC😂
100%
@@ohdilonewell, no one assumed you were intellectuals
@@cindytartt4048 how many nope pedophiles do they need to protect before you realise they are a bad organisation?
Absolutely. And btw - did Steven at any point say anything like: „Pls aply any medical advice you pick up in this podcast mindlessly without double checking any information we debate here“?
No?
I didn‘t think so either.
Get a grip.
We DONT NEED your investigation.
We know the truth.
My close relative died because of chemo. His organs got literally fried. His veins became rock hard and couldn’t receive any treatment afterwords. Doctors insisted for him to get more chemo which finished him.
Exactly pumping people full of radiation isn’t treatment
Or is it that he is interviewing people who are sharing the actual truth on the misinformation that we have have been told?
Dr Thomas Seyfried said that our ancestors haven't had any cancer because they hadn't had any sugary foods to eat back then, which is totally wrong. Scientists have found out that our ancestors had all sorts of cancer, too. Even dinosaurs had cancer. Sugar does contribute to cancer, even though it isn't the only factor benefiting it. That's the kind of misinformation we're dealing with. Cheers
@@UltimateRaven41"scientists" 😂
Lol no. And he's even had experts on that say one thing and then experts on later that say the complete opposite.
I watched that particular podcast and it was one of the most important and informative cancer related podcasts I’ve seen… sugar and highly processed foods are a major factor in the growth of cancer related diseases… the podcast did not rule out the use of radio therapy but it did say extreme uses of the therapy can in some cases do far more harm than good. Diet needs to play an important part when treating patients with cancer and the need to stop feeding or fueling cancer cells needs to be part of the treatment. Just because something doesn’t fit into the model of what we have learned over decades does not make it wrong and much of these so called treatments are backed by corporates who put profits before cure…. The BBC should know better and the need to look at both sides of the equation before demonising a topic without first understanding what it is saying and reading between the lines. Stephens podcasts are there to be listened to with an open and unbiased mind. He’s not there to challenge what his guests are saying as his guests are vetted before the show but where possible get another perspective and ask questions the ordinary person may not be able to ask.
Good on you Steven, we love you - clearly you are doing the right thing. Oh wait, I need to breathe some air, but let me call my doctor first to see if it is safe. Ridiculous! Our eyes are open, we know where truth lies. Stay brave Steven, don't let anyone bring you down.
This.
Yesss!
🤡
Until you get ill, perhaps get a coffin and and funeral ready for yourself in prep...what a moron.
Exactly. BBC only have a few sheep left watching
its very ignorant for bbc to assume that all cancer patients have treatment options. I live in a small town with no specialist for my type of cancer and other complications that doctors won't touch because I have a cancer diagnosis and no one wants to be a liability for spreading the cancer, etc.. so they've basically left me to die with a very large tumor that I lug around and it makes my life very very difficult and seems hopeless but the information about a keto diet being able to starve cancer gives someone like me hope and a path to self treatment.. something I can do.. something I can try when no one is offering me anything else..
Never stop the fight, never give up. Thank you for sharing your story, it is so important people hear such. Sending you love
@@innuendo4469 thank you very much
The BBC talking about sharing misinformation 😅 Someone should hand them a mirror
Exactly
That part 🪞
100%😂
At this stage I'll take a podcast over the BBC.
Yes!!!!
1000000%
For sure!
100%!!!!!!!
100%!! Please listen to the podcasts and follow all the advice. We need fewer humans on this overpopulated planet!
Which lobbyist instigated this message?
Diary of a CEO is one of my FAVORITE RUclips channel and I trust his channel over ANY main stream media channel. Let us think for ourselves! We are sovereign smart and strong human beings!
I LOVE Steven Bartlett's podcast! Sounds like Big pharma are frightened they'll lose money. Chemotherapy isn't right for everyone. Every cancer patient has the right to choose the type of treatment THEY want!! Steven isn't misleading or forcing anyone to do anything.
No but it's his job as the boss to make sure to have a disclaimer before every podcast.
Nonsense. Chemotherapy is a vital part of cancer treatment or palliation and putting this down to being against big pharma shows real ignorance
Keto diet is worthless
laughable propaganda from the BBC..... still waiting on their Johnson and Johnson talc cancer, piece
Lets see how far you're alternative medicine takes you when dying on the streets
😂If BBC or MSM ever says that something is a harmful or misinformation, that is what I want as it's a lead to the right information. Thanks for letting me as a new subscriber to this podcast.
Just subbed myself 😅😅😅. Thanks bbc
So people discussing different views from popular opinions are threats?
That's exactly what the BBC would have you believe. Never trust the legacy media.
yes. A threat to the big pharma control matrix.
THEY need YOU to believe their bullshit.
And state controlled media such as BBC are well and truly part of that matrix
Yes threats to Big Harma and the Truth
yes threats to their crappy license free as well that thousands are cancelling, and have cancelled recently, which also increases in april
Not everything online is true...
Just keep that in conscious
And with recent BOOM in Podcaster and "Experts".... Reality is even more diminished
I usually go to the doctor for medical advice not a podcast. We have to take responsibility for our own matters
BBC calling people out for misinformation is way to ironic
“Too,” not “to.”
BBC have a good track record of correcting any misinformation they put out there, maybe not a well as their initial statements but they do try. This is the whole point of journalism is to hold each other accountable for the publics benefit.
Sometimes the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is about 6 months.
@@poppinpussiesAfter the Southport trial the truth will be revealed and it's going to really hit the fan for the BBC and the Government. MPs aren't allowed to discuss it at the moment but it isn't going to go away.
@@sebastianguerre6868 I mean that’s a huge assumption itself, while in the super rare case that could be true, I’ve yet to see most conspiracies challenged and proven right. Especially within health claims. Don’t you remember the lockdown? Remember how many pieces of misinformation or conspiracies were floating around? While I don’t always doubt that some conspiracies can be true, particularly amongst political leaders, I think it’s more true for “alternative medicines” to be as much of a conspiracy too, I just don’t see any value or point to turning scientific medical studies into conspiracies unless you have stakes making profit within this for yourself. It’s a little but hypocritical to not question your own views when talking about conspiracy, it’s the fundamental value in seeking the truth.
Thank God for Steven Bartlett's podcast. His guests, especially on Diet and Medicine have change my life and the lives of my family as well. Keep doing what you are Steven. We depend on you. NOT THE BBC.
What actually is true: he had Gabor Mate on ADHD, Mate is famous on spreading a lot of misinformation on ADHD....
BBCsaid that his claim could dangerously mislead cancer patients to change their diet in a way that is actually detrimental to their health during their cancer treatments.
@@SueMaha21 what is also true is that he sells a product that contains sugars, fillers, seed oils aka HUEL DRINKS causing inflammation and potential disease. Crazy to think he interviews people telling him and others to avoid these things yet he invests and promotes something with it all in🤣...a little mis alignment and contradicts on my opinion. Would love to hear his thoughts on this
@@SueMaha21 that's not discrediting his podcast either as I think it's great but he doesn't follow through with it himself. Not sure about you but being a decent person I wouldn't be advocating and interviewing people trying to help then going against it by sling products with that stuff in. In one sense he's helping via the podcast and in another he is poisoning people with a product full of toxic inflammatory ingredients jusy doesnt make sense🤷🏼♂️
@@garysaunders1546doesn’t have to. He is not doing the podcasts to promote his product. I respect him more for that. I would never buy Huel, but I enjoy his podcasts.
Delighted that the BBC has brought Stephen Bartlett to the attention of many more people so they too get to understand the real possibilities to creating health. Great work BBC, keep it up!
Also encouraging are the comments here that really demonstrate that people are recognising what is truth. 🎉
After Healing myself from stage 3 cancer without conventional treatment I'll be continuing to listen to the real truth.. podcast like these are saving people's live
He 100% must putting truths out there. They wouldn’t fear him or want to shut him up !
Yeah it's almost like medical professionals don't want people to die 🤦
So based on what she’s saying people shouldn’t cut out or reduce sugar from their diets? That goes against every Oncologist’s advice & Cancer Research UK
They literally serve sugary foods in hospitals to patients. Jam on toast no less. It's really old habits that keep patients sick
When my elderly father was hospitalized he was fed a very high fructose and sucrose diet, even though he was diabetic. Then, as his blood sugar shot up they’d inject him with insulin. At some point, we started refusing their “food” instead providing dad with healthier alternatives with a similar protein and vitamin profile. The hospital could then gradually ween him off the injections. They had no objections. It’s simply that they don’t have funds for healthy food, only for meds.
she absolutely did NOT say that at all....reported for misinformation.
@@yupmup404 you’re hard 🥴
The truth of the matter is that encouraging someone to improve their diet is seen as a potential harm to them whist pushing chemotherapy as the only option , regardless of the outcome is considered fine. Why don’t they start by stating what causes such huge increase in cancer? Question to which apparently they don’t have a concrete answer to. Or avalanche of autoimmune diseases? Treating the cause is the core of solution.
You going to do a piece on the open letter from over 1000 doctors to ban mRNA products?
Mustn't frighten the peasants, they might revolt....
Well said
Let's not hold our breath waiting for that.. Its shocking and uncomfortable to consider what the BBC is accountable for (and that's only the stuff we know about) Here they are just showing exactly the kind of priorities they have, while attempting to present it as some genuine concern for public health..
Not bloody likely
Jeezzzz, BBC sounds jealous of Steven 😮
Thank you BBC, for always being a shining light of truth, in a dark world of misinformation!
Sarcasm level: 50000000
Meanwhile, this video is more accurate than your cynically motivated comment. Irony?
I guess evidence based treatment isn't glitzy. Normal people trust doctors over Stephen Bartlett.
Your Iranian masters are displeased with your efforts. Try harder
I think you forgot a few zeros!
😂 Everybody is spreading misformation except BBC and other media who is sponsored by big pharma and other evil companies 😂
Disappointing article from BBC. This podcast is giving alternative options. People should be able to think for themselves. Don’t assume people are stupid.
Oh you mean like alternative facts?
I think your expectations of bbc may have been too high. This is exactly the rot I've come to expect fron them.
@@Wee162 facts can change overtime, via new information, experiments, studies.
Lots of fear mongering from the ‘experts’. Steven doesn’t challenge any claims even when there’s no scientific basis behind them
@@dayleywhaley2420 Good point co-vid facts changed in record time.
BBC should be the last people to talk about health misinformation. Please allow freedom of expression
He must be doing something right to get this type of attention. Keep up the good work, Steven! Thank you for looking out for us.
His podcast is my favorite! He is the best host ever for not talking too much and dialing back his own ego in these conversations. Perhaps his episodes are best watched by curious but critical minds. If you plan to change your life based on what one person says in one episode, maybe do some further research beforehand. That's on you! We need shows like DOC
Plus 1! I've learnt so much from DOAC. It's my favorite podcast. Thank you, Steven!
You would like modern wisdom then
😂😂😂😂The BBC accusing anyone of misinformation is frankly laughable.
‘Now, then, now then’.
Fabulous comment, love it!😂👍🏻
Who are the four "experts" which the BBC consulted with regard to health matters?
1. Pfizer 2. Moderna 3. JandJ 4. Bayer
@@mattstatkiewicz4876😂
@@mattstatkiewicz4876Well if that's actually true, that's beyond incredibly disturbing and not surprising!
@@mattstatkiewicz4876😂
Thanks. Im going to go watch them now.
LOL the BBC trying to brand anyone as a miss informer.
Dr Setfried (the cancer guy) is not JUST a guest. He’s been doing years of research into cancer.
Thomas N. Seyfried (born 1946[1]) is an American professor of biology, genetics, and biochemistry at Boston College. He received his PhD from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 1976. His postdoctoral fellowship studies were in the Department of Neurology at the Yale University School of Medicine where he served as an assistant professor in neurology. He did undergraduate work at the University of New England, formerly St. Francis College, and received a master's degree in genetics from Illinois State University, Normal.
So he can't be wrong about any findings?
@@mbrylewskiso your doctor cant be wrong about his findings?
@@mbrylewski Not the point. The BBC programme making a point about not trusting guests who aren't qualified just some random thing on the internet, that they should see their doctor. But this guy is eminently qualified to make statements regarding health and based on experience. No it doesn't mean he's right but he deserves to be listened to.
If you watched the entire episode you will remember that this doctor also admitted to Steven that he doesn't follow his own advice. I like Steven's podcast but the one with Dr. Seyfried can be skipped.
@@khakipants2918I don't know what advice you're referring to. Be more specific.
Reading through the comments it is obvious that the kind of people who would watch/listen to diary of a CEO in the first place would never believe BS "news" like this anyway
Steven has the best podcast!
I’m going to watch every episode I can of Steven Bartletts podcast.
Lmao so true. If the BBC shames you, you know you're like 99% on to something
You would get healthier by taking that time and simply going to the gym or a walk. I'll sum up most of the content for you, eat healthy, be active, live longer.
@@jaxr2958 Aaah, but there's a nuance as you get older. Your body will very likely get insulin-resistant, you will put on visceral fat, especially in the liver and your baseline inflammation levels will tend to rise. If you are like 80% of UK citizens who are obese, or 15% with T2 diabetes or pre diabetes etc etc you need advice _how_ to eat to be healthier.
@@djanitatiana His podcasts can be 2.5 hours long. That's a lot of procrastination packaged with bit of advice on how to eat healthier. My point, get 2.5 hours exercise instead and I'd bet 99% of people would be better off.
@@jaxr2958you know you can listen to a podcast while exercising right? They’re not mutually exclusive
Why should he challenge the claims? He's not a doctor. Let the experts speak. If you disagree, take it up with the doctor.
My wife had stage 3 colorectal cancer. Changed diet under advice and instruction from a medical professional who had stopped being part of the mainstream system due to the power and control of drugs companies. We did this path as a friend had cured her cancer by the same professional. The main thing i got was the individual approach and to work with the patients beliefs.
If you don't mind me asking, what dietary changes were made please?
BBC is trying to gaslight you, isn't it inspiring? lol
@@bunnyliberationfront No Sugar. No seed oils,(butter and Extra virgin olive oil) No Grains. The idea is to reduce the inflammation and acidity.
Intermittent fasting to help the body to repair.
Keep it simple. Seasonal food, No Food from the Nightshade family(tomatoes, potatoes,peppers)
Eat Wild meat like venison, Fish eggs etc
How much are you paid to lie online like this?
@@acex222 No pay, Just a Human who likes to share their experiences with others so they maybe able to make decisions that are beneficial to us as a species, Like we have since we first became Humans
As with any medicine or food changes should be researched thoroughly before undertaking the changes. Always talk to your GP or healthcare provider.
I 100% trust this podcast more than the BBC and its 4 experts..... 😂
Exactly the aim
Here
I love Stevens podcast. I love the diversity of interviews and the freedom of expression allowed there. Keep it up Steven.
fool
If it entertains you, It doesn't mean It's fully responsibly curated content. There's a dangerous precedent set, when you're projecting information that could actually be wrong (especially if other subject matter content comes across as educated, or is factual).
@@LiquidusTalonI suggest you take your claims about SB and apply it to BBC "News"
It is a journalism podcast whether he likes it or not and he needs to be responsible with who he invites over, as he is essentially providing them a huge platform to spread whatever they want
Thank you for giving Steven free promo. Mainstream news is done and he is the present and future of information and knowledge.
And you all fell for it
Thanks God for him! Giving the right information through his guests. That’s why this BBC is saying this. 😡😡😡😡
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Each person is responsible for their own healthcare. If it wasn’t for You Tube I would still be suffering from Hashimoto’s. Thank you Diary of a CEO. You’re helping people help themselves.
Is there any source in particular that you'd recommend for managing Hashimotos? Thanks
I think the biggest claims she’s made here: 60 second advice people are taking. No they’re doing research. Sugar does contribute to a lot of conditions that can amplify cancer cutting sugar out should always be the first thing you do. The doctors they mentioned aren’t selling supplements they’re providing some useful info. Do proper research
This worries me about the authenticity of BBC now. I've seen that episode and at no point does he simplify it to just cutting out sugar, and juicing. He also doesn't advocate that you don't do chemo, he just tells you that it is in fact harmful (that's why it works so you can't really deny that fact). He also doesn't push ANY supplements or pills. In fact he encourages more study of the subject based off of what his studies show. He wants REAL scientists and Dr's to look at what he's saying from a point of understanding not simply refuting because your peers say don't look at the data. I have never be on the level of a conspiracy theorist but this is giving me MAJOR cover-up vibes.... and BTW he LITERALLY said the same thing this DR said in that there isn't a magic bullet to cure cancer which is more proof that you either didn't listen to the podcast or are deliberately omitting or cherry picking what you want from it. This is real clownery frfr. Yall think we all stupid huh.
The authenticity of the BBC went out the window decades ago. Nobody pays any attention to this controlled organisation except the older generations and those without the ability to discern. The irony here is hilarious. The BBC actually claiming someone is pushing health misinformation! Globalist Shills.
What the f is he even doing talking about it.
He's not a doctor, if he has no experience in health care he has no business discussing it in any kind of factual manner.
They are commenting on the guests he brings on the show, not what Steven says himself. You are doing the cherry picking yourself here. Not sure why you would separate his guests on his podcasts as “real doctors” vs the rest of the drs who do not appear on his show as if they quantify legitimacy 🤷. If you watched this new clip they even quote that Steven’s company spoke out saying they don’t always agree with the guests but the point is that they bring on many views. The issue what the bbc have with him is that he fails to question the problematic views on his podcasts, and sadly people don’t always listen to context but prefer soundbites that can be inherently misleading on their own without context, thus promoting the spread of misinformation. Honestly, I think you need to rewatch this news clip again because I think you failed to grasp context here too.
It’s fake news now
@@irishbob26 Have you watched or listened to the podcast?
How much did BBC get from BigPharma for this
Stephen has never said, "ignore your doctor" and he's not a medical professional.
You know Steven Bartlett is doing well if the BBC are trying to “Fact check” him 😂
He's upset the overlords
@ they will be shitting themselves, now the world is starting to wake up 😄
🤡🤡🤡
@@clairkinsman6648 wake up to what?
People arent waking up, people are starting to fall for misinformation and claim they are waking up @clairkinsman6648
Shame on you BBC. People should be free to say and to listen to what they want with regards to better health.
😂😂😂 yes the bbc definitely knows better 😩 as if I’m taking any notice from the bbc about health care,the same people who told us the vaccine was good for us,keep up the good work Stephen
This is laughable of BBC. Just having a chat with guests....let those with alternative views breathe.
You're not thinking.
Come on we can't let these thoughts spread.
Don't you remember all the misinformation during COVID.
( Just wanted to see how you'd handle an alternative view lol)
You can go and enjoy your click bait. Person [B], who is more vulnerable and doesn't tune into the possibility It's 'alternate' views, may actually do some harm to themselves. You don't have to consider that though, right?
Not wise
But their not sharing "views" there pushing false information as fact, this can be harmful to people if they believe this BS
@@matthewred8622what misinformation? The lies from the BBC?
seems like some overlords are upset...
I was thinking the same
You mean the private healthcare industry which Steven is for…
Another example of desperate BBC grasping at straws to try and bring down their competition. Podcasts are more popular and more trusted than the BBC by far now.
This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen online!!!
Shame on you, BBC!!!
They silenced Dr Berg... now a million Dr Bergs are on one of the worlds biggest podcasts and big pharma is losing it😂
What do you mean, they silenced Dr Berg? How?
@@suvsn9593 they took off all his videos on RUclips to make them very hard to search for for a very long time
Love Dr. Berg!!
It was a question of time these elites starts attacking channels that shares healthy facts! Smh
Get back in your box BBC, nobody cares what you think. Your reputation is in the toilet
They are the masters of misinformation
😂😂😂 so true
BBC is worse than what's in the toilet 😅.
The comment section is pretty much passing the vibe check ❤
I love how they thought they were going to tear him down but his community is spamming with ❤❤ for SB
I concur button --->