Funny think about dinosaurs being "dumb" or driven by instincts because their brains were more similar to crocodilians is, crocodilians have been proven to be fairly intelligent. Not bird level intelligent, but they can plan, they learn to recognize people or objects fairly quickly and they can not only be trained, but can remember the training for years.
they can also adapt fairly quickly to brand new environments. i saw a short doc on how crocs in india i believe adapted to sitting in certain positions when a dam was constructed to catch the fish better. they're quite a bit smarter than people normally give them credit for
@@Gasmaskmax He doesn't speak for everyone. It's obvious to most what Fight Club is going to be about so why is he bemoaning the obvious?, comparing dinosaurs to intelegent complex wolves was a cheap jibe with no scientific accuracy whatsoever. Dinosaurs would be far more like to aggression than modern day wolves with their complex familly structure. Don't agree with his wining. Title says what it is so why does he moan ? We know of the other side of dinosaurs from books & other docus etc. Just sit bk & enjoy this for what it is. End of.
@@michealtaylor7745 For the most part, you're correct, but Hoops is not bemoaning everything, he's simply pointing out how a show of this genre should and shouldn't focus on. This is simply supposed to be enjoyed as a non-educational fun tv show with dinosaur fights, instead it's supposed to be an educational docu-series, which it isn't. I'd watch it if it wasn't, I still quite enjoy this, but it is trashing on what most of us paleontology lovers enjoy. And there is plenty of evidence showing intelligence in dinosaurs, while probably not as smart as wolves, the analogy is still there, and dinosaurs aren't what they're depicted as in JFC. WWD handles this topic well because it focus on dinosaurs living their daily lives while still conveying information and keeping interesting with storytelling and the occasional action as well as displaying the animals in a way that tells a story about them and the creatures they share the environment with. So yes, I agree that this should be enjoyed as the opposite of what it is, but what it's supposed to be is just sad, and you can't ignore it.
The Jurassic fight club pachyrhinosaurus is the reason why dinosaur documentary rants exist. This man is a legend. He explained this entire show in full detail without getting annoyed or ranting. Most people don't last 10 minutes without insulting this show so congrats.
I do respect your opinion and I do agree to point that animals fighting each other isn't best way to showcase premise for documentary. But, there's point where I have to disagree, the show is aimed at actual discoveries (in some episodes) and try to make accurate recreation of that battle. Sometimes, the episodes just focus on who would win in fight against who. Now, I will talk about animations or dinosaur models, even though models for most of creatures are outdated, they look realistic, in terms of having muscle movements and models look pretty life like. Honestly, I understood where the premise was going, so I was mainly looking forward to fights and I knew what I was in for.
The sad part is the CGI is so great, with all the jiggling muscles and realistic movements; barring the naked raptors, most of the dinosaurs have vivid, eye-catching color schemes. It's a shame such good creature design went to such great waste on such a shallow, vapid show.
Michael W0rkinMan The Ceratosaurs, Allosaurus, Majungathous, Albertosaurus, Nanotyrannus, and T-Rex designs are pretty good. The Utahraptor and Dromeosaurus designs are dumb though
Also, can you please do review on Monsters Resurrected? There's one episode that would make Jurassic Fight Club look weak of showcasing prehistoric creatures as "movie monsters".
For me, I quite like the series a bit because I like the way of it’s cool editing and never actually get bored. Anyway, I respect his opinion on the documentary
Great review! My biggest gripe with this show aside from inaccuracies and violent portrayals of prehistoric animals, is 40 minutes of reguritated lectures, and finally when we get to the battles, Dinosaur George has to pause the scene every five seconds to explain what's happening, as if the audience couldn't figure it out on their own.
I'll admit. I absolutely ate JFC up when I was a kid. Though, I fortunately figured out years ago how silly it was. This show is almost as brainless and flashy as Monsters Resurrected. This review really nails it.
Animals fighting can actually be very interesting. It could go into how an animal's anatomy would affect how they fight. Imagine it's showing an Allosaurus fighting something. Allosaurus had a decently weak bite force, making scientists theorize that it used its head like an axe. It could then talk about how that could damage the skull, or how this is possible, etc.
The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs (AKA Dinosaur Face-Off) did the same concept a lot better, with much less gore and showing more to the behaviour of the animals than just fighting.
I never realized how much these people shitted on Ceratosaurus. It was the punching bag for big (Obviously favorited) dinosaurs like Allosaurus. Poor thing got brutally mutilated multiple times. And at the same time, these ''educators'' would mock the dinosaur. I think its safe to say that the people behind Jurassic Fight Club did NOT like Ceratosaurus! I also want to mention how aggravating It was seeing how STUPID they'd make these dinosaurs. Will never get over an Allosaurus taking on a massive saurpod when it has a dead ceratosaurs, baby AND adult stego free for it to eat off to the side.
It reminds me of most pivot animations I see on RUclips, just dinosaurs tearing each other apart without reason but just for blood,gore,and to favor the more fan based dinosaurs just to kill
To be honest, I never really saw it as a documentary. I only saw it as a dinosaur battle simulator. If it wasn't for this stupid show, I might not have discovered those dinosaur stick fights.
@@Kingsmartie6951 Walking With Dinosaurs: *says facts* Jurassic Fight Club: DINOSAURS FIGHT TO THE DEATH FOR FUN,WATCH THIS T-REX RIP THE ALLOSAURUS HEAD OFF,ALLOSAURUS VS 17 UTAHRAPTORS,TRICERATOPS USE IT'S HORNS TO KILL ANYTHING IN IT'S PATH, T-REX WAS VENOMOUS,VELOCIRAPTOR IS 7 FEET TALL, *Gives Spinosaurus horns* ,T-REX TEARS OUT OTHER DINOSAURS THROATS, *Makes Velociraptors tear Deinonychus apart* , *Gives Gigantosaurus saber teeth* ,THE ALLOSAURUS THROWS THE ANKYLOSAURUS WHICH BREAKS IT'S BACK AND LEGS, RIPS OPEN IT'S STOMACH,AND PULLS IT'S HEAD OFF,THE DEINONYCHUS AND ANKYLOSAURUS WEREN'T SMART CREATURES, WATCH THE UTAHRAPTOR RIP THE DEINONYCHUS BOTTOM JAW OFF,WATCH THE DIPLODOCUS CRUSH THE ALLOSAURUS AND EATS IT
I mean, there's plenty of fossils with injuries, either fatal or healed. Going into the mechanics of how extinct fauna fought while cutting down the not-fighting parts would present a substantial amount of material, whether directly based on the injuries seen on known fossils or just extrapolation. Seems this film just wanted to throw two dead things at each other and say it's science, though.
I got an idea for season 2: 1. Fight To Die: Velociraptor vs Protoceratops 2. Big vs Bigger: Giganotosaurus vs Argentinosaurus 3. Who Will Win: Spinosaurus vs Carcharodontosaurus 4. Doom To Doom: Smilodon vs Woolly Mammoth 5. Old Fight: Allosaurus vs Stegosaurus 6. Ocean Fight: Mosasaurus vs Cretoxyrhina 7. Flying Terror: Quetzalcoatlus vs Saurornitholestes 8. Old Fiends: Tyrannosaurus Rex vs Triceratops 9. Poison Killer: Microraptor vs Sinornithosaurus 10. The Duel Of Jurassic Enemies: Allosaurus vs Saurophaganax 11. Riverbank Battle: Futalongkosaurus vs Megaraptor 12. Smarts vs Horns: Troodon vs Chasmosaurus
Super Mario Logan Fan Velociraptor Vs. Protoceratops actually WAS planned to be an episode at one point, according to George Blassing. But what you have to remember is that nearly each of the episodes in this series is based on a specific fossil find. So here are a couple of examples for Season 2 ideas based on that criteria: 1. Desert Duel: Velociraptor Vs. Protoceratops (based on the Fighting Dinosaurs fossil of those two fighting each other). 2. Battle Of Paluxy River: Acrocanthosaurus Vs. Paluxysaurus (the iconic Dinosaur trackway at Dinosaur Valley State Park in Texas).
Whenever this show came on, my friends and I would record it, bet on who we thought would win the fight without watching it, then skip to the last 10 minutes to watch the final battle. While I enjoyed it for the most part, I agree with everything you said. Plus, I always thought the prehistoric animals were really well animated and rendered, especially compared to most post-Walking with Dinosaurs paleo-documentaries.
first time I saw this documentary was through a reuploaded clip of deep sea killers on YouKu and I was genuinely surprised when I found out that it was from this hellhole of a documentary
One of my favorite documentaries at the moment is "Raising a Giant" with david attenborough. Its very informative and grabs the attention without even having cgi clips longer than 10 seconds. It also helps you learn of the paleontological processes taken to uncover and display a dinosaur. Much goode
To me Jurassic Fight Club is not a documentary but an entertainment show is the same vain as Animal Face Off and Deadliest Warrior. I feel with that being the case they should with just admitted that's what the show was instead of insulting the viewer's intelligence by acting like it was a documentary.
What annoyed me about this series was how factual inaccurate the show was. Granted as time goes on, you expect shows like these to become factually inaccurate. The problem is though, that from the very beginning practically everything they said was wrong, be it constantly oversizing animals, getting time periods completely wrong, or literally coming up with random “facts” about these animals that had no basis or was even thought up at time the series aired
Stegotyranno 420 Majungasaurus is erroneously referred to as the junior synonym, "Majungatholus", possibly because the name sounded cooler The legs on the Majungasaurus model are too long; Majungasaurus actually had very short legs, they even comment on the species having short legs during the episode The Triassic is labeled as lasting from 225-193 MYA; however, it was actually 251-201 MYA Also, a Deinonychus is shown under Triassic, strangely, despite living in the Early Cretaceous. The model was possibly there to fill in for an early theropod from the Triassic, such as Eoraptor or Coelophysis The Jurassic is labeled as 193-136 MYA, and this is also wrong; the Jurassic began 201 MYA and ended 145 MYA the Cretaceous is labeled from 136-55 million years ago. This is incredibly wrong; the Cretaceous began 145 MYA and ended 66 MYA. 55 million years ago, the world was in the middle of the Eocene epoch of the Cenozoic. It is unknown as to how such a major error occurred These are only a few examples of a huge range I could’ve picked from
Hey, Hoops and Dino Man, have you heard of Genndy Tartakovsky's "Primal"? It's kind of like this, but it drops all pretense of being educational and just focuses on action and world building. It's about a neanderthal (named, "spear") and a T-Rex ("fang") journeying around the world, leaving everything out there that tries to kill them- and by that I mean EVERYTHING out there- in bloody pieces behind them. It takes a few liberties with the prehistoric creatures in favor of the setting, but I think it's worth a watch. Then again, given your opinion on this.... Eh, just check it out and see what you think. If you don't like it, don't watch it.
I remember watching that Gastonia episode and being interested by the symbiotic relationship it had with those pterosaurs. Wish there was a bit more about that.
The narration of When Dinosaurs Roamed America acknowledges that, most of the time, a prehistoric world would be filled with moments of boredom, in the sense that you'd, mostly, be seeing animals behaving peacefully, as opposed to hunting and killing each other.
Ehhh... As cool as violence is, I absolutely would pay to watch a documentary on dinosaurs that just portrays them as regular animals. It'd also be a good opportunity to show off new dino models based off of what we know now.
The one thing you forgot to mention, is most of these episodes were based on actual fossil discoveries, and not just pitting prehistoric animals against eachother.
Not really. This mocumentary, this deliberate misinformer made it seem like it's a solid fact that these were real fights that took place. It was literally pitting prehistoric animals against each other in what could've been an act of scavenging a dead carcass etc
That's not entirely accurate. For example, the whole Tenantosaurus episode is based on a fossil site that actual Paleontologists believe was actually a site of scavenging rather than a pack kill site.
I can’t say I completely agree with you. Yes I agree there should have been less focus on the fighting but to me it was still quite entertaining. Still I respect your opinion
The tricky part is that you need to be well informed enough to begin with to make that distinction. Whereas, if this series is someone's entry title into the topic, it can cause some problems I think. Just enjoying it for entertainment is valid, though!
@@heli0ns Yeah, don't worry. I was well informed long before watching this series, with Dinosaur Planet, When Dinosaurs Roamed America, Prehistoric Park and the entire Walking With franchise.
I think my personal biggest problem with this show was that it perpetuates the kind of infantile approach to dinosaur science, which is to say... The only topic that ever gets discussed is to argue over which dinosaur would beat which in a fight. It frustrates me when I see it being the topic of conversation, as if though there isn't more to dinosaurs (or any animal) than just killing one another, or if that is somehow the crown jewel of all existence. It's so banal and uninspired, and we really do not need any more pandering to that line of thinking.
But you have to admit every one does have those scenes in their heads. Every since anyone learned there is more than one dinosaur people have wondered who would win in fights. The presentation was what failed
The commercial style of editing was clearly meant to keep the attention of young boys. With that in mind, it clearly did it's job well. It didn't lose my attention at all I watched it all those years ago.
Jurassic Fight Club imo is the poster child for bad dinosaur documentaries. We can do better than this, there's alot more to learning about dinosaurs than just seeing them fight like bloodthirsty monsters. The fights are fun to watch,but when it comes to a fact based documentary this show just falls apart.
In my eyes this was never a documentary series. I liked it, personally. If you want to see a more accurate view of dinosaur fights and biology, watch Clash of the Dinosaurs. It’s one of my favorite dinosaur documentary series.
You should start reviewing dinosaur documentaries from the 80s and 90s, like the one hosted by Christopher Reeve, the PBS mini series, or even the Eric Boardman/Gary Owens hosted specials! :D
Another great review DinoMan! ^^ I really like it, how you took your time actually explaining your problem with this show. All those little examples, just like in your review on _March of the Dinosaurs_ really made your point clear. And that's something special, because I'm certain most people wouldn't put their effort into explaining those points in such detail but rather just mention them. But through your explanation I can totally agree with your arguments and furthermore I'm feeling educated ;) As for _Jurassic Fight Club_ I don't have that many memories of that show. I remember it being aired on some private TV-channels, with commercial-breaks, quiz-shows, blockbuster and sitcom-evenings and stuff, ..... seemed fitting to me. However what I do remember, was that those scientist made many experiments in testing the strength of said animals. Testing their bones durability and their jaws and claws strength etc, and this was very cool and interesting in my opinion. Although I do not know if that may was in a whole different show 'cause there was a similar show with fighting recent animals instead of prehistoric ones. So to speak, if that whole experimental stuff wasn't in Jurassic Fight Club, that would also have been a nice improvement on the show. Anyway keep up the great work! To may provide further review-inspiration I can highly recommend David Attenborough's _First Life_ , but you certainly already know that one ;)
Can someone please explain to me why so many people in the comments are defending this show on the basis that it's just entertainment? It clearly presents itself as a documentary even though it's complete bullcrap.
well maybe Because it keeps it name by giving you what it promises. It's like Animal planets Animal Face offs( which was equally terrible) . And Alot of the people saw it as a kid. A age when you'd watch anything with Cgi Dinosaurs and enjoy it.
Never watch Jurassic Fight Club in my life (and I usually tend to avoid it because even before this video I found premisse for a documentary unappealing) but what strikes me how much its main selling point being the violent cgi death battle, the show isn't shooting itself in the foot anymore but severing its foot and give it to lunch in a enclosure full crocodiles to then enter a marathon. I was once watching tv and I stumbled by chance onto a short animal documentary series I can't remember the name right now. The premise is simple, you had a guy who I swear looks like the janitor character from Scrubs serving as host and presented you archives of hunting scenes from several documentaries. The show then present both animals included in the scenes in small quips, analyzing the overrall strategies of the predator and the prey, letting the audience understand and speculate on how it would end before showing the full clip. Each episodes featured 3 hunt scenes that follows certain themes, one was about the hunting strategies of wild canids, one whose hunters are tree dwellers, one was about the cephalopods etc etc. Compared to other docs, it's certainly not the best around but this show showcased why JFC on the wrong tracks. It's not because the former ("the hunt show") decided to focus on a small aspect of these animals lifes, as well the most violent part and presumably most untertaining that it forgets it's still a documentary and as such, puts on a show as well actually teaches you things (for example, the tree hunters, features a clip with Chimpanzees... as predators hunting smaller monkeys, I never knew that personnaly and actually mad eme discovered an aspect of the animal's lifestyle I didn't knew about before). And it's not the only way a doc can give you an action packed and thrilling premisse for a documentary, look at Chased by Seamonsters that sells the prehistoric seas we explored as the most dangerous seas in history, it still workd because it doesn't not forget to be a documentary as well. Speaking of which, the review made by Red Raptor Writes leaves no doubt that JFC is one of the worst example a prehistoric documentary taking huge liberties with reality. It often happens with these that they walk the line of creating fictionnal stories using real things. I'm always on edge on the subject, IMO a documentary shouldn't lie to you but good things can be created from liberties taken. For example, the walking with series has a lot animals coexisting when they should not, or showcasing things way that contradicts what scientists said was true and are still true today (one of he biggest contender IMO, Basilosaurus being showacased as a ocean predator when it was likely that it dwelled in the mangroves of egypt, rendering the whole plot of Whale Killer non sense), but in spite of that, the walking with approach not was interessting but also, if I didn't knew about the basilosaurus thing, this honestly wouldn't seem too fafetched at face value, which makes it more tolerable. While JFC, I may have not watched it but thanks to a review of RRW Not only they actually delivers true facts that they then disregard as if it real infos were just for fluffs and worse, when they make speculative choice, its huge strecth overrall, like making the T-Rex bites like what we believed the Komodo dragon worked with the bacteria infected jaw. A huge strecth coming off from a wrong idea on top of that. I can like a dumb blockbuster featuring dinos as much as liking a documentary but JFC seems to try to be both and without some kind of miracle, it only ended up becoming a weird The Thing like mess. Seperatly they can be entertaining on their own way for very different reasons but fused together without any kind of thought, it just leaves you with confused product.
Not gonna lie, I enjoyed JFC as a kid, partly because of the dinosaur action, but also because it featured dinosaur species that I hadn't seen before in documentaries. However, looking back on it, I do agree that there's a lot of focus on violence in the show. I think more documentaries should be like Walking with Dinosaurs, presenting a prehistoric world with animals in it, acting as though it were our own. The animals would be doing peaceful things, not just needlessly fighting all the time. Maybe that might seem boring to some people, but I think it would definitely be entertaining.
Although I like Jurassic Fight Club I agree with everything you say, also I dislike the narration! It just seemed so edgy with his DEEP, VOICE, AND SAYING WORDS LIKE HELL... Also, Rule number one of Jurassic Fight Club: Don't Talk About Jurassic Fight Club!
This show is kind of the “summer blockbuster” of dinosaur media. Yeah, maybe it’s a bit much. But I enjoyed this a lot when I was a kid, and upon rewatching it recently, I did still enjoy it (aside from the over use of repeated clips). Plus, I don’t think that the scientific information is completely lacking in this series. I still remember learning about the splayed toes and the antorbital fenestra (the hole in the skull of some theropods that can be confused for the eye when looking at the skull) of Allosaurus from the 4th episode of Jurassic Fight Club.
If you wanted to make a show of prehistoric animals fighting, make a show of prehistoric animals fighting, putting a framing sequence at the start of each episode and sports announcers to commentate. Don't fool everyone into watching a blood fest of a documentary with barely any educational factor.
If you want a better show with a similar premise. Watch Animal Face Off Which (unlike this garbage) doesn’t try to sell itself as a documentary. Instead, it’s a simple “what if these animals went head-to-head?” And it shows each animals strengths and weaknesses. And runs a simulation that puts them together for a fight to see who comes out on top.
I highly disrespect you're opinion. Dinosaurs are animals, not monsters. And after seeing the show's treatment of the Ceratosaurus, I hated it even as a child.
I so agree with this. I personally always hated that so matter how injured, outmatched or outnumbered the dinosaurs/creatures are in a fight in each episode, they have to kill every single creature they see. They always fight King of The Hill style and be like, "I am a carnivore! F*** you and die!"
i like dinosaurs because of the ecosystem like for example small dimorphodons riding plateosaurus for protection and a t rex killing a triceratops and when it leaves the corpse or goes to sleep troodons run there and eat what is left you get what im saying just the image of these giant creatures that you would say would consume too much energy by just walking that seemingly should not exist but they did in their own giant world
I didn't really enjoy it, it was like a WWE show with blood, violence and gore. I didn't like how they viewed the animals as mindless blood thirsty killers, who look for fights.
There's still less violence in Jurassic Park and the animals actually behave believably... Except maybe anything other than Rexy in the Jurassic World trilogy.
@@chasehodgmo5537 animals targeting and killing people for vengeance is actually documented in both predators and prey today. The spino got crashed into by the plane, and thus had a (kind of) convincing reason to chase after the group after they hit its sail.
While I do agree with what you said, the only reason I still like Jurassic Fight Club is because of nostalgia and because it introduced me to Dinosaurs like Ceratosaurus, Majungasaurus, Nanotyrannus, Albertosaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus which are now one of my favorite Dinosaurs
Well, looks like I got the better end of the bargain, I got introduced to Ceratosaurus by When Dinosaurs Roamed America and to Albertosaurus by Prehistoric Park. Also "Nanotyrannus" didn't exist, it's just some juvenile rexes.
I had watched this about 6 to 8 months before you made this and here in France it was called Jurassic secrets. On the front cover it had these exact words(jurrasic secrets learn more). It was totally just trying to make your expectations really high than keep it going until about 30 minutes into episode one when you realise its only depicting Dinasaurs as monsters.
Reply to this comment to submit video responses
(Here's what I mean by that: ruclips.net/video/KOHMgFxju1g/видео.html )
The first rule of Jurassic Fight Club is: You do not talk about Jurassic Fight Club.
Good advice. I want nothing to do with this trash.
I see what you did there 😏
Yea lol
Very easy thing to do since none of the participants (bar the whales) can communicate like that
Yeah never talk...about.....it
Funny think about dinosaurs being "dumb" or driven by instincts because their brains were more similar to crocodilians is, crocodilians have been proven to be fairly intelligent. Not bird level intelligent, but they can plan, they learn to recognize people or objects fairly quickly and they can not only be trained, but can remember the training for years.
they can also adapt fairly quickly to brand new environments. i saw a short doc on how crocs in india i believe adapted to sitting in certain positions when a dam was constructed to catch the fish better. they're quite a bit smarter than people normally give them credit for
Author of the video ignored this or something?
@@filippaustralovenator2.033 author of the video tries to avoid the revolting cesspit that is a youtube comments section
@@Gasmaskmax He doesn't speak for everyone. It's obvious to most what Fight Club is going to be about so why is he bemoaning the obvious?, comparing dinosaurs to intelegent complex wolves was a cheap jibe with no scientific accuracy whatsoever. Dinosaurs would be far more like to aggression than modern day wolves with their complex familly structure. Don't agree with his wining. Title says what it is so why does he moan ? We know of the other side of dinosaurs from books & other docus etc. Just sit bk & enjoy this for what it is. End of.
@@michealtaylor7745 For the most part, you're correct, but Hoops is not bemoaning everything, he's simply pointing out how a show of this genre should and shouldn't focus on. This is simply supposed to be enjoyed as a non-educational fun tv show with dinosaur fights, instead it's supposed to be an educational docu-series, which it isn't. I'd watch it if it wasn't, I still quite enjoy this, but it is trashing on what most of us paleontology lovers enjoy. And there is plenty of evidence showing intelligence in dinosaurs, while probably not as smart as wolves, the analogy is still there, and dinosaurs aren't what they're depicted as in JFC. WWD handles this topic well because it focus on dinosaurs living their daily lives while still conveying information and keeping interesting with storytelling and the occasional action as well as displaying the animals in a way that tells a story about them and the creatures they share the environment with. So yes, I agree that this should be enjoyed as the opposite of what it is, but what it's supposed to be is just sad, and you can't ignore it.
The Jurassic fight club pachyrhinosaurus is the reason why dinosaur documentary rants exist.
This man is a legend. He explained this entire show in full detail without getting annoyed or ranting. Most people don't last 10 minutes without insulting this show so congrats.
We honestly need more people like him.
That the problem with most of the content made by The History Channel, they make trash and try to hide it in a educational documentary.
Walking with Dinosaurs is still the best documentary about dinosaurs ever. Change my mind.
Planet dinosaur comes at a close second though
GojiraGuy 1954 nah, it constantly swaps between the dinosaurs and the science and it gets really jarring
I completely agree, despite an outdated or exaggerated fact or 2, i still enjoy every walking with... Series
That depends whether or not you count The Ballad Of Big Al.
big al ?
This is basically "what if Michael Bay was given a dinosaur documentary to direct"
OH HEEEEEEELL NO!!!
Hollywood's out of ideas, so frighteningly enough that might be a reality!!!
I'm not going to sleep for ages!
Nah there would be a lot more explosions
NO, IM NOT GONNA HAVE THAT
nah. michael bay would be the spinosaur documentary, where they made up facts and made the animal bigger and more ferocious than it actually was.
I do respect your opinion and I do agree to point that animals fighting each other isn't best way to showcase premise for documentary. But, there's point where I have to disagree, the show is aimed at actual discoveries (in some episodes) and try to make accurate recreation of that battle. Sometimes, the episodes just focus on who would win in fight against who. Now, I will talk about animations or dinosaur models, even though models for most of creatures are outdated, they look realistic, in terms of having muscle movements and models look pretty life like. Honestly, I understood where the premise was going, so I was mainly looking forward to fights and I knew what I was in for.
The sad part is the CGI is so great, with all the jiggling muscles and realistic movements; barring the naked raptors, most of the dinosaurs have vivid, eye-catching color schemes. It's a shame such good creature design went to such great waste on such a shallow, vapid show.
Despite these things I do like some of the creatures designs.
Michael W0rkinMan The Ceratosaurs, Allosaurus, Majungathous, Albertosaurus, Nanotyrannus, and T-Rex designs are pretty good. The Utahraptor and Dromeosaurus designs are dumb though
First rule of Jurassic fight club, never talk about Jurassic fight Club. Second rule of Jurassic fight club, never talk about Jurassic fight club!!!
It’s good for a reviewer to make positive and negative reviews, to teach your viewers what should and shouldn’t be done
Also, can you please do review on Monsters Resurrected? There's one episode that would make Jurassic Fight Club look weak of showcasing prehistoric creatures as "movie monsters".
LegitEliminator He should also do a review on Bigger then T Rex documentary. I’d like to hear his opinion on the quadruple Spinosaurus
If you need something less violent and more educational, might I suggest "David Attenborough's Natural History Museum Alive"?
“Blood, gore, violence, explosions.”
*Michel Bay in a nutshell*
Not so much blood and gore, he tries to keep his films PG-13 to reach the widest possible audience, and thus make the most money.
"I believe documentaries can do better than Jurassic Fight Club"
you forgot something, documentaries SHOULD do better than Jurassic Fight Club
In the UK, Allosaurus was Called "The Ballad Of Big Al"
The is like the documentary equivalent of all that paleoart where everything is shrink-wrapped and screaming.
They never show two dinosaurs sitting together enjoying camomile tea and discussing their problems :(
For me, I quite like the series a bit because I like the way of it’s cool editing and never actually get bored. Anyway, I respect his opinion on the documentary
Great review! My biggest gripe with this show aside from inaccuracies and violent portrayals of prehistoric animals, is 40 minutes of reguritated lectures, and finally when we get to the battles, Dinosaur George has to pause the scene every five seconds to explain what's happening, as if the audience couldn't figure it out on their own.
Wait what? Dinosaur George was there too?! Disappointed.
I'll admit. I absolutely ate JFC up when I was a kid. Though, I fortunately figured out years ago how silly it was. This show is almost as brainless and flashy as Monsters Resurrected. This review really nails it.
Silly, yes. But I still like this show. If it’s good for anything, it’s to help you fall asleep.
Me too
Animals fighting can actually be very interesting. It could go into how an animal's anatomy would affect how they fight.
Imagine it's showing an Allosaurus fighting something. Allosaurus had a decently weak bite force, making scientists theorize that it used its head like an axe. It could then talk about how that could damage the skull, or how this is possible, etc.
That's what BBC does.
So basically like the Mortal Kombat Xrays.
jurassic fight club DID do that. hoopsanddinoman just doesn't like violence which is why he couldn't listen to the facts the scientist mentioned.
The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs (AKA Dinosaur Face-Off) did the same concept a lot better, with much less gore and showing more to the behaviour of the animals than just fighting.
I never realized how much these people shitted on Ceratosaurus. It was the punching bag for big (Obviously favorited) dinosaurs like Allosaurus. Poor thing got brutally mutilated multiple times. And at the same time, these ''educators'' would mock the dinosaur. I think its safe to say that the people behind Jurassic Fight Club did NOT like Ceratosaurus!
I also want to mention how aggravating It was seeing how STUPID they'd make these dinosaurs. Will never get over an Allosaurus taking on a massive saurpod when it has a dead ceratosaurs, baby AND adult stego free for it to eat off to the side.
Jurassic Fight Club is an edgy 12 year old's fanfic.
Change my mind.
It reminds me of most pivot animations I see on RUclips, just dinosaurs tearing each other apart without reason but just for blood,gore,and to favor the more fan based dinosaurs just to kill
Same, dude.
To be honest, I never really saw it as a documentary. I only saw it as a dinosaur battle simulator. If it wasn't for this stupid show, I might not have discovered those dinosaur stick fights.
Remember when Walking With Dinosaurs was interesting and captivating because it showed these animals as animals and not movie monsters? I miss that.
I dislike Jurassic Fight Club
I wish they remade Walking With Dinosaurs
indeed animals are animals not monsters
@@Kingsmartie6951
Walking With Dinosaurs: *says facts*
Jurassic Fight Club: DINOSAURS FIGHT TO THE DEATH FOR FUN,WATCH THIS T-REX RIP THE ALLOSAURUS HEAD OFF,ALLOSAURUS VS 17 UTAHRAPTORS,TRICERATOPS USE IT'S HORNS TO KILL ANYTHING IN IT'S PATH, T-REX WAS VENOMOUS,VELOCIRAPTOR IS 7 FEET TALL, *Gives Spinosaurus horns* ,T-REX TEARS OUT OTHER DINOSAURS THROATS, *Makes Velociraptors tear Deinonychus apart* , *Gives Gigantosaurus saber teeth* ,THE ALLOSAURUS THROWS THE ANKYLOSAURUS WHICH BREAKS IT'S BACK AND LEGS, RIPS OPEN IT'S STOMACH,AND PULLS IT'S HEAD OFF,THE DEINONYCHUS AND ANKYLOSAURUS WEREN'T SMART CREATURES, WATCH THE UTAHRAPTOR RIP THE DEINONYCHUS BOTTOM JAW OFF,WATCH THE DIPLODOCUS CRUSH THE ALLOSAURUS AND EATS IT
Well...
I’d say that a documentary about dinosaurs fighting could work if it’s done properly
I mean, there's plenty of fossils with injuries, either fatal or healed. Going into the mechanics of how extinct fauna fought while cutting down the not-fighting parts would present a substantial amount of material, whether directly based on the injuries seen on known fossils or just extrapolation. Seems this film just wanted to throw two dead things at each other and say it's science, though.
Especially about fights that actually happened.
Like an Allosaurus got nutshot by a Stegosaurus.
Watch the 2 part documentary The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs, also branded as Dinosaur Face-off, it's done way better than this show was.
I got an idea for season 2:
1. Fight To Die: Velociraptor vs Protoceratops
2. Big vs Bigger: Giganotosaurus vs Argentinosaurus
3. Who Will Win: Spinosaurus vs Carcharodontosaurus
4. Doom To Doom: Smilodon vs Woolly Mammoth
5. Old Fight: Allosaurus vs Stegosaurus
6. Ocean Fight: Mosasaurus vs Cretoxyrhina
7. Flying Terror: Quetzalcoatlus vs Saurornitholestes
8. Old Fiends: Tyrannosaurus Rex vs Triceratops
9. Poison Killer: Microraptor vs Sinornithosaurus
10. The Duel Of Jurassic Enemies: Allosaurus vs Saurophaganax
11. Riverbank Battle: Futalongkosaurus vs Megaraptor
12. Smarts vs Horns: Troodon vs Chasmosaurus
Super Mario Logan Fan cleaver
Super Mario Logan Fan Velociraptor Vs. Protoceratops actually WAS planned to be an episode at one point, according to George Blassing. But what you have to remember is that nearly each of the episodes in this series is based on a specific fossil find. So here are a couple of examples for Season 2 ideas based on that criteria:
1. Desert Duel: Velociraptor Vs. Protoceratops (based on the Fighting Dinosaurs fossil of those two fighting each other).
2. Battle Of Paluxy River: Acrocanthosaurus Vs. Paluxysaurus (the iconic Dinosaur trackway at Dinosaur Valley State Park in Texas).
Kevin Norwood
AKA Sauroposeidon
If I'm not mistaken, Mapusaurus coexisted with Argentinosaurus and Giganotosaurus didn't.
Could you do a video on Monsters Resurrected? It's like the perfect example of a bad documentary, especially the Spinosaurus episode.
You do not talk about Jurassic Fight Club.
The best way to describe this, it's like if Michael Bay made a documentary of his own lol.
That’s accurate! 😂😂😂 Seriously though, Micheal Bay would get a lot of hate if he made a paleo-documentary that decided to pull the mess this show did.
Jurassic Fight Club is basically an Indian Soap Opera.
The fact that a documentary about a guy going back in time is more realistic that Jurassic fight club is a bit mad
Whenever this show came on, my friends and I would record it, bet on who we thought would win the fight without watching it, then skip to the last 10 minutes to watch the final battle. While I enjoyed it for the most part, I agree with everything you said. Plus, I always thought the prehistoric animals were really well animated and rendered, especially compared to most post-Walking with Dinosaurs paleo-documentaries.
My thoughts exactly! "20 BUCKS ON THE ALLOSAURUS!"
I agree, the jiggle physics always looked great on the dinosaurs.
Am I the only one who didn't even know this was supposed to be a documentary thanks to only seeing RUclips clips?
I watched it on t.v. and I thought it was just for fun with a little factual bits thrown in :v
first time I saw this documentary was through a reuploaded clip of deep sea killers on YouKu and I was genuinely surprised when I found out that it was from this hellhole of a documentary
One of my favorite documentaries at the moment is "Raising a Giant" with david attenborough. Its very informative and grabs the attention without even having cgi clips longer than 10 seconds. It also helps you learn of the paleontological processes taken to uncover and display a dinosaur. Much goode
So it's just Bayformers just with dinosaurs.
That is the most accurate description of Jurassic Fight Club I've seen yet.
"this is a load of scrap metal"
-the ambulance guy, transformer the animated series.
Ratchet!
To me Jurassic Fight Club is not a documentary but an entertainment show is the same vain as Animal Face Off and Deadliest Warrior. I feel with that being the case they should with just admitted that's what the show was instead of insulting the viewer's intelligence by acting like it was a documentary.
What annoyed me about this series was how factual inaccurate the show was.
Granted as time goes on, you expect shows like these to become factually inaccurate.
The problem is though, that from the very beginning practically everything they said was wrong, be it constantly oversizing animals, getting time periods completely wrong, or literally coming up with random “facts” about these animals that had no basis or was even thought up at time the series aired
African Safaris with a Chocolate Lab Named Aspen example please
Stegotyranno 420
Majungasaurus is erroneously referred to as the junior synonym, "Majungatholus", possibly because the name sounded cooler
The legs on the Majungasaurus model are too long; Majungasaurus actually had very short legs, they even comment on the species having short legs during the episode
The Triassic is labeled as lasting from 225-193 MYA; however, it was actually 251-201 MYA
Also, a Deinonychus is shown under Triassic, strangely, despite living in the Early Cretaceous. The model was possibly there to fill in for an early theropod from the Triassic, such as Eoraptor or Coelophysis
The Jurassic is labeled as 193-136 MYA, and this is also wrong; the Jurassic began 201 MYA and ended 145 MYA
the Cretaceous is labeled from 136-55 million years ago. This is incredibly wrong; the Cretaceous began 145 MYA and ended 66 MYA. 55 million years ago, the world was in the middle of the Eocene epoch of the Cenozoic. It is unknown as to how such a major error occurred
These are only a few examples of a huge range I could’ve picked from
What a stupid response
@@LevTark that's an accurate response.
@@LevTark Nice self introduction.
Ceratosaurus: *exists*
Paleo media: and I took that personally
Majungasaurs name: *exist*
Majungathoulous: *”is for me?”*
I hate how Ceratosaurus is always bullied in paleo media.
Yeah, it hurts 😑
Oh yeah, it's just an animal yet bullied for some reason
@@migsyh2065 true
Ceratosaurus: *exist*
Jurassic Fight Club: We hate you
The angsty teen of Dinosaur Documentary's
XD
PRONATED WRISTS ON THERAPODS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Its SOOOOOOOOOOOO bad!
That intro perfectly sums up Jurassic Fight Club in a nutshell it's just blood violence Gore and Roar
Hey, Hoops and Dino Man, have you heard of Genndy Tartakovsky's "Primal"? It's kind of like this, but it drops all pretense of being educational and just focuses on action and world building.
It's about a neanderthal (named, "spear") and a T-Rex ("fang") journeying around the world, leaving everything out there that tries to kill them- and by that I mean EVERYTHING out there- in bloody pieces behind them. It takes a few liberties with the prehistoric creatures in favor of the setting, but I think it's worth a watch.
Then again, given your opinion on this.... Eh, just check it out and see what you think. If you don't like it, don't watch it.
I remember watching that Gastonia episode and being interested by the symbiotic relationship it had with those pterosaurs.
Wish there was a bit more about that.
The narration of When Dinosaurs Roamed America acknowledges that, most of the time, a prehistoric world would be filled with moments of boredom, in the sense that you'd, mostly, be seeing animals behaving peacefully, as opposed to hunting and killing each other.
That was when discovery was reasonable, God I miss those days! (I feel like the elderly high priestess from inuyasha)
Ehhh... As cool as violence is, I absolutely would pay to watch a documentary on dinosaurs that just portrays them as regular animals. It'd also be a good opportunity to show off new dino models based off of what we know now.
I grew up with WWD
RazorCraft me too kid
Hardcore Jurassic Fight Club Enthusiast: >:O
Average BBC Walking with Dinosaurs Enjoyer: 😎
So is this what you see you turn on the history Channel at 3 am
O Boy 3 am
This show actually traumatized me as a kid. The blood really got to me.
The one thing you forgot to mention, is most of these episodes were based on actual fossil discoveries, and not just pitting prehistoric animals against eachother.
Mitchell Skene
Yes but only some of these discoveries are indicative of bloody combat.....
Not really. This mocumentary, this deliberate misinformer made it seem like it's a solid fact that these were real fights that took place. It was literally pitting prehistoric animals against each other in what could've been an act of scavenging a dead carcass etc
@@riamus7258
Can you please tell me where to find planet dinosaur in 1080p?
“this dinosaur has a scratch on its leg, it must’ve a participated in an arson”
That's not entirely accurate.
For example, the whole Tenantosaurus episode is based on a fossil site that actual Paleontologists believe was actually a site of scavenging rather than a pack kill site.
I can’t say I completely agree with you. Yes I agree there should have been less focus on the fighting but to me it was still quite entertaining. Still I respect your opinion
How on earth did this show earn a 7.8 on the imdb rating honestly?? I guarantee dinosaur revolution was way better than this
yes,Allosaurus (broken jaw) in that show has personality like normal animal
Jurassic Fight Club
more like Awesomebro: The Documentary
I enjoy this show, but I choose not to watch it as a documentary. Instead, I watch it more as just entertainment.
The tricky part is that you need to be well informed enough to begin with to make that distinction. Whereas, if this series is someone's entry title into the topic, it can cause some problems I think. Just enjoying it for entertainment is valid, though!
@@heli0ns Yeah, don't worry. I was well informed long before watching this series, with Dinosaur Planet, When Dinosaurs Roamed America, Prehistoric Park and the entire Walking With franchise.
Wendigo Dragon I love the show
Wendigo Dragon Agreed
This show is what Jurassic Park would have been if it was directed by Michael Bay. Oh the horrifying thought......
4:28 In most of America, that's average speed.
I think my personal biggest problem with this show was that it perpetuates the kind of infantile approach to dinosaur science, which is to say... The only topic that ever gets discussed is to argue over which dinosaur would beat which in a fight. It frustrates me when I see it being the topic of conversation, as if though there isn't more to dinosaurs (or any animal) than just killing one another, or if that is somehow the crown jewel of all existence. It's so banal and uninspired, and we really do not need any more pandering to that line of thinking.
But you have to admit every one does have those scenes in their heads. Every since anyone learned there is more than one dinosaur people have wondered who would win in fights. The presentation was what failed
It's like if Michael Bay wanted to a dinosaur documentary lol
No, there aren't enough explosions and american flags
No. The effects would be better.
The commercial style of editing was clearly meant to keep the attention of young boys. With that in mind, it clearly did it's job well. It didn't lose my attention at all I watched it all those years ago.
Jurassic fight club fans when two dinosaurs don’t start screaming and fighting at each other for no reason
I don't get it
? What do Jurassic fight club fans do when 2 dinosaurs don’t start screaming at and fighting each other for no reason? Explain plz
@@maryray4960 They ramble.
@@maryray4960 they go crazy cause they think that 2 animals fight to death whenever they see each other
Jurassic Fight Club imo is the poster child for bad dinosaur documentaries. We can do better than this, there's alot more to learning about dinosaurs than just seeing them fight like bloodthirsty monsters. The fights are fun to watch,but when it comes to a fact based documentary this show just falls apart.
This document is like a Michael Bay dinosaur documentary.
0:13
BLOOD, GORE, EXPLOSIONS, VIOLENCE, BLOOD, RAWRR!, VIOLENCE!!!
Evan Dinosaur *Jurassic fight club*
In my eyes this was never a documentary series. I liked it, personally. If you want to see a more accurate view of dinosaur fights and biology, watch Clash of the Dinosaurs. It’s one of my favorite dinosaur documentary series.
Crackinator and walking with dinosaurs
I mean, I wouldn't have a problem if it wasn't trying to "educate" the audience.
Clash of the dinosaurs is worse than JFC
@@VelociraptorsOfSkyrim The fact that you have a problem and your criticism is so absurd, is funny.
@@LevTark The fact that you just said that without giving any reason (and correct grammar) is so absurd and funny.
You should start reviewing dinosaur documentaries from the 80s and 90s, like the one hosted by Christopher Reeve, the PBS mini series, or even the Eric Boardman/Gary Owens hosted specials! :D
0:17 LOL Zootopia
@@freestylefighter13 delete your comment
@@freestylefighter13 wtf
Vut
Rapior Pizarro they did
I honestly can't stop watching your reviews. They're beautiful! Could you review primeval?
also jurassic fight club hate ceratosaurus
Yeah I just noticed that
Another great review DinoMan! ^^
I really like it, how you took your time actually explaining your problem with this show. All those little examples, just like in your review on _March of the Dinosaurs_ really made your point clear. And that's something special, because I'm certain most people wouldn't put their effort into explaining those points in such detail but rather just mention them.
But through your explanation I can totally agree with your arguments and furthermore I'm feeling educated ;)
As for _Jurassic Fight Club_ I don't have that many memories of that show. I remember it being aired on some private TV-channels, with commercial-breaks, quiz-shows, blockbuster and sitcom-evenings and stuff, ..... seemed fitting to me.
However what I do remember, was that those scientist made many experiments in testing the strength of said animals. Testing their bones durability and their jaws and claws strength etc, and this was very cool and interesting in my opinion. Although I do not know if that may was in a whole different show 'cause there was a similar show with fighting recent animals instead of prehistoric ones.
So to speak, if that whole experimental stuff wasn't in Jurassic Fight Club, that would also have been a nice improvement on the show.
Anyway keep up the great work!
To may provide further review-inspiration I can highly recommend David Attenborough's _First Life_ , but you certainly already know that one ;)
Can someone please explain to me why so many people in the comments are defending this show on the basis that it's just entertainment? It clearly presents itself as a documentary even though it's complete bullcrap.
well maybe Because it keeps it name by giving you what it promises. It's like Animal planets Animal Face offs( which was equally terrible) . And Alot of the people saw it as a kid. A age when you'd watch anything with Cgi Dinosaurs and enjoy it.
0:12 honest intro 😂😂😂
Ouch. You just hurt my younger kid self. But you make some good points.
Never watch Jurassic Fight Club in my life (and I usually tend to avoid it because even before this video I found premisse for a documentary unappealing) but what strikes me how much its main selling point being the violent cgi death battle, the show isn't shooting itself in the foot anymore but severing its foot and give it to lunch in a enclosure full crocodiles to then enter a marathon.
I was once watching tv and I stumbled by chance onto a short animal documentary series I can't remember the name right now.
The premise is simple, you had a guy who I swear looks like the janitor character from Scrubs serving as host and presented you archives of hunting scenes from several documentaries. The show then present both animals included in the scenes in small quips, analyzing the overrall strategies of the predator and the prey, letting the audience understand and speculate on how it would end before showing the full clip. Each episodes featured 3 hunt scenes that follows certain themes, one was about the hunting strategies of wild canids, one whose hunters are tree dwellers, one was about the cephalopods etc etc.
Compared to other docs, it's certainly not the best around but this show showcased why JFC on the wrong tracks. It's not because the former ("the hunt show") decided to focus on a small aspect of these animals lifes, as well the most violent part and presumably most untertaining that it forgets it's still a documentary and as such, puts on a show as well actually teaches you things (for example, the tree hunters, features a clip with Chimpanzees... as predators hunting smaller monkeys, I never knew that personnaly and actually mad eme discovered an aspect of the animal's lifestyle I didn't knew about before). And it's not the only way a doc can give you an action packed and thrilling premisse for a documentary, look at Chased by Seamonsters that sells the prehistoric seas we explored as the most dangerous seas in history, it still workd because it doesn't not forget to be a documentary as well.
Speaking of which, the review made by Red Raptor Writes leaves no doubt that JFC is one of the worst example a prehistoric documentary taking huge liberties with reality. It often happens with these that they walk the line of creating fictionnal stories using real things. I'm always on edge on the subject, IMO a documentary shouldn't lie to you but good things can be created from liberties taken. For example, the walking with series has a lot animals coexisting when they should not, or showcasing things way that contradicts what scientists said was true and are still true today (one of he biggest contender IMO, Basilosaurus being showacased as a ocean predator when it was likely that it dwelled in the mangroves of egypt, rendering the whole plot of Whale Killer non sense), but in spite of that, the walking with approach not was interessting but also, if I didn't knew about the basilosaurus thing, this honestly wouldn't seem too fafetched at face value, which makes it more tolerable. While JFC, I may have not watched it but thanks to a review of RRW Not only they actually delivers true facts that they then disregard as if it real infos were just for fluffs and worse, when they make speculative choice, its huge strecth overrall, like making the T-Rex bites like what we believed the Komodo dragon worked with the bacteria infected jaw. A huge strecth coming off from a wrong idea on top of that.
I can like a dumb blockbuster featuring dinos as much as liking a documentary but JFC seems to try to be both and without some kind of miracle, it only ended up becoming a weird The Thing like mess. Seperatly they can be entertaining on their own way for very different reasons but fused together without any kind of thought, it just leaves you with confused product.
Not gonna lie, I enjoyed JFC as a kid, partly because of the dinosaur action, but also because it featured dinosaur species that I hadn't seen before in documentaries. However, looking back on it, I do agree that there's a lot of focus on violence in the show. I think more documentaries should be like Walking with Dinosaurs, presenting a prehistoric world with animals in it, acting as though it were our own. The animals would be doing peaceful things, not just needlessly fighting all the time. Maybe that might seem boring to some people, but I think it would definitely be entertaining.
Although I like Jurassic Fight Club I agree with everything you say, also I dislike the narration! It just seemed so edgy with his DEEP, VOICE, AND SAYING WORDS LIKE HELL...
Also,
Rule number one of Jurassic Fight Club: Don't Talk About Jurassic Fight Club!
This 'Documentary' is the reason why I thought Albertosaurus was extremely lanky and that Dromaeosaurs could take down Hadrosaurs
0:13 sums up what people think about when you say the word dinosaur to them
This show is kind of the “summer blockbuster” of dinosaur media. Yeah, maybe it’s a bit much. But I enjoyed this a lot when I was a kid, and upon rewatching it recently, I did still enjoy it (aside from the over use of repeated clips). Plus, I don’t think that the scientific information is completely lacking in this series. I still remember learning about the splayed toes and the antorbital fenestra (the hole in the skull of some theropods that can be confused for the eye when looking at the skull) of Allosaurus from the 4th episode of Jurassic Fight Club.
If you wanted to make a show of prehistoric animals fighting, make a show of prehistoric animals fighting, putting a framing sequence at the start of each episode and sports announcers to commentate. Don't fool everyone into watching a blood fest of a documentary with barely any educational factor.
If you want a better show with a similar premise.
Watch Animal Face Off
Which (unlike this garbage) doesn’t try to sell itself as a documentary.
Instead, it’s a simple “what if these animals went head-to-head?”
And it shows each animals strengths and weaknesses. And runs a simulation that puts them together for a fight to see who comes out on top.
Being honest I do enjoy the show, I thought it was cool seeing these Titans clash with each other but I do understand what you all mean
I highly disrespect you're opinion. Dinosaurs are animals, not monsters. And after seeing the show's treatment of the Ceratosaurus, I hated it even as a child.
I so agree with this. I personally always hated that so matter how injured, outmatched or outnumbered the dinosaurs/creatures are in a fight in each episode, they have to kill every single creature they see. They always fight King of The Hill style and be like, "I am a carnivore! F*** you and die!"
To be fair, they do show Gastonia giving up after it incapacitates the Utahraptor. However, that’s one gem in a pile of coal.
JFC feels like a Pivot dinosaurs fight videos but 3D
TRUEEEE
0:00 This beginning though XD
I liked Jurassic fight club just for the violence
That's why its called Jurassic fight club XD
I highly disrespect you're opinion. These were animals and not movie monsters.
“Explosions!”
Michael Bay be proud.
The Nanotyrannus snout always reminded me of the Weasels from Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
i like dinosaurs because of the ecosystem like for example small dimorphodons riding plateosaurus for protection and a t rex killing a triceratops and when it leaves the corpse or goes to sleep troodons run there and eat what is left you get what im saying just the image of these giant creatures that you would say would consume too much energy by just walking that seemingly should not exist but they did in their own giant world
Blood! Gore! Explosions! Violence! BLOOD! RAWR! VIOLENCE!
....
Jurassic Fight Club.
Love that opening. XD
I didn't really enjoy it, it was like a WWE show with blood, violence and gore. I didn't like how they viewed the animals as mindless blood thirsty killers, who look for fights.
I hate this show, too. To me, it’s Mortal Kombat with dinosaurs.
If I want to see dinosaur violence I go to watch Jurassic Park, they need to leave our dinosaur documentaries alone, good video
There's still less violence in Jurassic Park and the animals actually behave believably... Except maybe anything other than Rexy in the Jurassic World trilogy.
or the old stick figure animations of dinosaurs fighting that will work too
@@trabistheidio1095 or the spinosaurus desperetly trying to kill alan and the group throughout the whole goddamn movie
@@chasehodgmo5537 animals targeting and killing people for vengeance is actually documented in both predators and prey today. The spino got crashed into by the plane, and thus had a (kind of) convincing reason to chase after the group after they hit its sail.
While I do agree with what you said, the only reason I still like Jurassic Fight Club is because of nostalgia and because it introduced me to Dinosaurs like Ceratosaurus, Majungasaurus, Nanotyrannus, Albertosaurus and Pachyrhinosaurus which are now one of my favorite Dinosaurs
RangoGamer same, Pachy is my favorite Ceratopsian as well.
*N A N O T Y R A N N U S*
Well, looks like I got the better end of the bargain, I got introduced to Ceratosaurus by When Dinosaurs Roamed America and to Albertosaurus by Prehistoric Park.
Also "Nanotyrannus" didn't exist, it's just some juvenile rexes.
The clip of deinonychus attacking tenontosaurus reminds me of how poor tenontosaurus is basically only featured as a victim of deinonychus.
Wow... he wants to talk about something positive. Finally someone on the internet that talks about positive things!!
Cinema Wins talks about almost exclusively positive things in movies.
I know, right! There's still hope for humanity!
I had watched this about 6 to 8 months before you made this and here in France it was called Jurassic secrets. On the front cover it had these exact words(jurrasic secrets learn more).
It was totally just trying to make your expectations really high than keep it going until about 30 minutes into episode one when you realise its only depicting Dinasaurs as monsters.