Short-Faced Bear vs Carnotaurus | Who Would Win?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 июн 2024
- Today we get into a debate between two prehistoric giants: the fearsome Carnotaurus and the massive Arctodus Simus! Discover which of these amazing animals would dominate in a head-to-head battle.
If you enjoyed then I'd appreciate if you like and subscribed!
I do not own any of the footage and images utilized, they belong to their respected sources
Thumbnail Picture Credit
Carno: Marcos Villarroel
Arctodus: HodariNundu
Sources
Sakamoto M. (2022). Estimating bite force in extinct dinosaurs using phylogenetically predicted physiological cross-sectional areas of jaw adductor muscles. PeerJ, 10, e13731. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13731
Soibelzon LH, Schubert BW. The largest known bear, Arctotherium angustidens, from the early Pleistocene Pampean region of Argentina: with a discussion of size and diet trends in bears. Journal of Paleontology. 2011;85(1):69-75. doi:10.1666/10-037.1
Persons, W. S., 4th, & Currie, P. J. (2011). Dinosaur speed demon: the caudal musculature of Carnotaurus sastrei and implications for the evolution of South American abelisaurids. PloS one, 6(10), e25763. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone....
Mauricio A. Cerroni, Ariana Paulina-Carabajal, Novel information on the endocranial morphology of the abelisaurid theropod Carnotaurus sastrei, Comptes Rendus Palevol, Volume 18, Issue 8, 2019, Pages 985-995, ISSN 1631-0683, doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2019.0....
Cerroni, Mauricio A.; Paulina-Carabajal, Ariana (2019). "Novel information on the endocranial morphology of the abelisaurid theropod Carnotaurus sastrei". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 18 (8): 985-995. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2019.09.005
Matheus, Paul E. (2003). Locomotor adaptations and ecomorphology of short-faced bears (Arctodus simus) in eastern Beringia. Yukon Palaeontologist, Gov't. of Yukon
Figueirido, B., Pérez-Claros, J. A., Torregrosa, V., Martín-Serra, A., & Palmqvist, P. (2010). Demythologizing Arctodus simus, the ‘short-faced’ long-legged and predaceous bear that never was. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 30(1), 262-275. doi.org/10.1080/0272463090341...
#dinosaur #bear #vs #carnotaurus #shortfacedbear #debate 
Животные
It always amazes me how mid sized predators were still bigger than 99% of the land predators we have today.
What’s the 1%
Unless it’s smaller than a Polar/Kodiak bear, than it’s larger than 100% of all land predators today.
100%*. Largest polar bear is 1 ton. Even mid sized Theropod Allosaurus reached 3 tons
@@MonsterZilla452 no, the largest polar bear without extra fat should be 700 kg.
Ikr? Predatory dinosaurs are in a different league when it comes to size amazing scary creatures
Carnotaurus: Stand proud Arctodus you are strong.
Arctodus: What is this?
Arctodus: Tears?🖐
Carnotaurus: Good question i wouldn't know.
Stop these nonsense ✋
@MonsterZilla856 🙃: Nah I'd meme.
Till' the tyrannosaurus enters the picture
@@MonsterZilla452
Sit ashamed, you are not him
This is a mismatch. Carnotaurus was over twice as massive as arctodus ( on average ) and still significantly larger when using the largest specimen. The dinosaur would overpower the bear. A more fair matchup is with Majungasaurus instead.
Yo man u still alive?
@@DocAllo yeah but im too busy to make videos atm
@@DocAllo what happened to your videos?
@@TheKingWolf470 i think it was enough of the channel
@@DocAlloHe actually is very active in different channels community posts unlike u
Some dinosaurs fr just gave up on having arms
Well you wouldn't really need them if you're evolved to have a massive, bone eviscerating mouth instead. You don't need to really grab onto anything if all it takes is one bite
I have a theory that the movie dinosaur was a prequel to The movie Land before Time and it was just a story of how the valley came to be.
The valley isn't exactly created in that movie, they just find an entry to it.
There's another theory out there about Dinosaur being a prequel to The Lost World (the classic film, not thr JP film)
@@addictedtochocolate920 that's explain a lot why the dinosaurs can live unbothered after several millions years of their actual extinction date. But the refugia also hold various other animals that existed before dinosaurs like labyrinthodont amphibian and even several animals that appear after dinosaur extinction can reached the valley one by one. Hence deer, tapir, and glyptodon can also discovered there
@@prasetyodwikuncorojati2434 The theory does state that both other species and modern humans eventually found the same passage in times of crisis. This is of course just a little fun coincidence that sounds somewhat reasonable; i do not think the similarities were intentional
I first saw Carnotaurus from Dinosaur King. Dinosaurs were my childhood.
Dinosaur King was a goated show
@@TheOverseerDebates Absolutely
@@TheOverseerDebatesyou shall be correct
@@TheOverseerDebates I concur
Great show
Carnotaurus vs Short Faced Bear = Hypsilophodon wins.
Psittacosaurus solos
🧢 Microraptor Slams
@@TheOverseerDebates another psittacosaurus enjoyer???
Nah microceratus solos
Cap yinlong demolishes
9:20 this is actually wrong. The reason why the short face bear was so rare at the tar pits is because it lived in more open habitat areas the tar pits, mostly take place in the forest and areas. That’s why there are sabertooth cats and dire wolves at the tar pits more than short faced bears and American lions.
Mostly take place in the forest and what areas?
The reason given by the authors of the paper is that all the three bear species recovered from the Tar Pits were likely not regularly competing for carcasses (at least not at the rate the hypercarnivores were competing for said carcasses), with lower population densities to boot. Arctodus simus was recorded at its baseline continental abundance, though from a shorter time window.
@SuperTah33 it’s not just that it’s also because the short face bear was also a nomad because basically the entire continent was its habitat
@Dramn_ that I don’t know
@@tyrannotherium7873 Oh okay thank you
Bear uses stand up, Carnotaurus uses charge and tackle, its super effective.
And drops to the floor.
I read "shit faced beard" lol
Bro, great video👍 Your channel is popping off!! I like how you kept it as accurate as possible (I liked how you even referenced the debate on whether the limbs of the bear made it a poor grappler or not). I pretty much agree with the verdict :) Keep up the amazing work 🐻🦖
Appreciate it!
When are you gonna post more dinosaur vs mammal content cc I need more
Finally, after a while, your new Overseer video was successful again!!! it was a particular clash and unique💪
More to come!
For those who don’t know, The 1.2 tonne fat-free mass estimate for a large Arctodus specimen comes from a volumetric estimate on the Kansas River giant specimen scaled from others of its kind, where the author calculated a fat+fur free mass of 1211kg; with these added on, it would likely surpass 1300kg in life.
Do you have the paper for that? I only have this one for the Kansas River specimen
liberalarts.tamu.edu/csfa/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2023/07/CRP-18-2001.pdf
Carnotaurus was way stronger , way larger , way faster and way tougher and way dangerous and fearsome than Arctodus.
Bear better
should have used arcthotherium not arctodus
@@han-sooyoung Still Carnotaurus would win
@@amitpalit4343 yes. It was a stupid matchup
Arcthotherium would win it was 13 feet over 3k pounds
This reminds me of the old book that said a grizzly bear could easily defeat a _Tyrannosaurus rex_ due to being a mammal-and therefore warm blooded and far smarter than the cold-blooded and pea-brained oversized lizard.
What book was it please 😂😂😂
That's absurd, a grizzly is like a chihuahua that would nip at a t-rex's ankles 😂
That's like saying a human can beat a saltwater crocodile in a straight up fight for the same reasons.
Well since we're reading bs might as well pick the acclaimed book "Hot wet Allosuarus summer", yes it is a real book! 😂
Great video!
Thank you for giving Carnotaurus some love.
aside from the battle being a mismatch due to the size discrepancy this video is a W as always.
mfw you pit the nearly 2 ton carnotaurus against a bear half its size
Do argentinosaurus vs a rat
Now that is just unfair. That rat will eat argentinosaurus alive
@@TheOverseerDebates Next Tyrannosaurus Rex vs hippopotamus
@@TheOverseerDebates kind of like this battle.
A bear half a carno's mass would get demolished.
Some of the colour patterns on the paleoart are absolutely gorgeous.
Dinosaurs were OP, the devs definitely made the right move by removing them from the server
“Well if the bear got up on its hind legs it might cause me some trouble…”
But would you lose?
“Nah, I’d win”
I agree with your assessment and outcome. I still think the Arctodus could hold its own and potentially win a lucky few encounters, however. It’s incredible how strong modern bears are, so I’d imagine that a large male Arctodus would be one of the last mammals any Carnotaurus would want to bother. This was a very interesting breakdown, so I’d like to suggest some future, similar topics.
Ceratosaurus vs Daeodon
Utahraptor vs American Lion
Herrerasaurus vs Hyaenodon Gigas
Correct me if I'm mistaken,
but aren't archosaur/reptile muscles more dense than mammal muscles. Wouldn't that also make Carnotaurus stronger pound by pound?
mammals have denser bones and muscles than those of reptiles (including archosaurs)
@@asiergonzalez4060Not really, especially since reptiles like crocodiles are far more explosive than many mammals of similar size
@@asiergonzalez4060you are thinking about birds, teropods dont neded empty bones
@@megamente7849 A lot of dinosaurs had the same sort of network of airspaces and hollows in their bones that their avian descendants have. There's even some evidence for having an avian-style one-way respiratory system (more efficient than mammalian respiration).
@@svenofthejunglewell the avain style Respiratory isn't just bird-exclusive crocodilians have them too.
Interesting. I’m Buying It.
Can you make a Video on Asiatic Lion Vs. American Alligator?
I've Just found your channel today and its been great! You're very well informed and make good quality videos. I look forward to seeing more from you
Glad you enjoyed!
I'd like to see a breakdown of similar sized cats versus dromeosaurs
What people ALWAYS get wrong about Carnotaurus are it's horns, due to the body of it and it's diet, they're clearly designed for stabbing it's prey while running along side or directly into them in the right angle, also why it's arms are basically not existent because of it's blatant build for ramming at high speeds, and why they were known for not having a high bite force since they can just inflict more greater internal damage to their prey that a simple bite couldn't do, with the ram being aided by the speed and force of the impact when said horns go into their prey to cause said internal damage.
I may not agree but I subscribe
Please make a video about t rex vs deinosuchus
I don’t know why, but for some reason, I thought this video was about Carnotaurus vs. a Polar Bear (instead of Short-Faced Bear).
Well, at least it’s a bit more of a formidable hypothetical opponent (Polar Bear probably wouldn’t last 3 minutes).
This is interesting regarding the size of Arctotherium.
Copium Rex actually had a similar thing going on with its femur, the femur was actually shorter than Stan, Sue, and Scotty’s femur but Copium’s was girthier.
While Arctotherium’s humerus was shorter than Arctodus by around 2cm it was also girthier by around 2cm as well.
I’m not a scientist or anything but it’s something to think about.
The size estimates based on femurs likely weren’t the same between T. rex and bears however, because something like Theropods iirc, you’ll go with the width of the femur not the length. Looking at the study and the post, using humerus length seems to best way to estimate the mass of the bear.
@@denistyrant both the femurs and humerus are weigh bearing bones so I think while there will be some differences in equation I still think it would have similar effects.
There’s also (Nicolás E Campione et al 2012-A universal scaling relationship between body mass and proximal limb bone dimensions in quadrupedal terrestrial tetrapods) this is what is said in the conclusion
“The conserved nature of the relationship between stylopodial circumference and body mass suggests that the minimum diaphyseal circumference of the major weight-bearing bones is only weakly influenced by the varied forces exerted on the limbs (that is, compression or torsion) and most strongly related to the mass of the animal. Our results, therefore, provide a much-needed, robust, phylogenetically corrected framework for accurate and consistent estimation of body mass in extinct terrestrial quadrupeds.”
I also couldn’t find anything on humerus length being a better indicator for mass estimates in general let alone for bears. I personally think only using one equation to estimate an animals mass would also yield a lower sample size. versus multiple equations to find the median/mean mass, which would lead to more accurate or reliable estimate imo.
The whole two ton size estimate for Arctotherium angustidens is far fetched for several reasons. The bone used for the size estimate had been broken and then healed, leading to a far greater diameter than it otherwise would have, thus giving false results when put into the equation.
It also ignores that there are multiple known Arctodus bones of the same limb element no less, that are larger than the specimen used in the study, and come from animals that only weighed around 1000kg, meaning the individual bear used to get the 2 ton size estimate would actually be smaller than 1000kg. The equation was also developed using obese brown bears in captive settings, meaning it is effectively useless for calculating the mass of non-obese bears.
So, from what material we have, Arctotherium angustidens likely only weighed around 800kg-bigger than any living bear save for the record sized polar bear, but smaller than Arctodus.
@@mhdfrb9971 “The 2ton estimate being far fetched” so you do agree with the paper! Because the paper says itself “The highest predicted value is probably unrealistic” aka the 2ton estimate.
Yes the specimen in question had heal damage but what you fail to mention is where on the specimen. The parts that were damaged were the caudal border and deltoid crest. Not the shaft of the humerus.
As I pointed out to the individual before you. diaphyseal circumference of the major weight-bearing bones strongly related to the mass of the animal (Nicolás E Campione et al 2012).I have yet to see a Arctodus specimen that surpasses the Arctotherium’s humerus in circumference. But if they are as common as you say they are then it should be no problem to mention them.
Which equation was based on an obese brown bear? There’s 6 different equations if you didn’t know, so one being unreliable probably wouldn’t change too much. Was it the 2ton estimate or the other three that put Arctotherium above 1,600kg. So many to choose from lol.
So, from one equation from one measurement used (length) of the humerus you guesstimate that the animal weighed 800kg despite the fact that the lowest estimate provided was 983kg so even the lowest estimate of Arctotherium would still make it slightly than the average Arctodus.
@@albino-fish The 800-900 kg size estimate is for the largest known Arctotherium angustidens individual, it’s not the norm for that species. An average of 550-650 kg seems more reasonable for them which is around the same as male polar bears. They were certainly huge bears, we just don’t have the material indicating they matched or surpassed Arctodus simus.
do australopithecus vs troodon
I think with the weight differences you would have a similar interaction to how that pair of lionesses encountered a honey badger.
It might just end in the Carno deciding it isn't worth the trouble
I think short faced. longevity, power, density, agility, brains.
The bear has denser fur and more fat- harder to land effective hits.
The bear has long, swinging, heavy limbs tipped with foot long claws- the carno has no claws or arms
The teeth and jaw of carnotaurus were weird- curved in an odd angle and the jaw pointed upwards, not much is known about bite power, but the bear has maximum power in its bite with the shorter, more compact jaw- nothing by itself, but it has foot long claws to mess around with!
You should make a verses with straight Tusk elephant
Because of its size in the movie as a kid, I thought that was supposed to be T-Rex, but my aunt was a former paleontologist before her foot was itched falling down a rock during one of her exhibitions, and she was a paleontologist I was I was a pampers, but when I was old enough to watch the movie, she wasn’t a paleontologist anymore, but she’s what gave me all my knowledge about dinosaurs and my dad. Of course heloved it.
All modern animals that have true horns use them so i agree they probably used them in intraspecific competition
Lots of horned reptiles don't use them for anything beyond display
@@princevermilion8799 can you give examples? Jacksons chameleons are one example that do, some are for defense though like Horned lizards but that still has a use other than display, its important not to confuse true horns with crests or casques seen on many birds/ dinosaurs
@@princevermilion8799 also large bodied animals are better comparisons imo
@@joakos1122 Acanthosaura sp., Harpesaurus sp., Cerastes cerastes, Pseudocerastes sp., Atheris ceratophora, Atheris matildae, Anolis proboscis, Ceratophora aspera
2:36
Bro's got that dino rizz
What comic is the first one!???
should've done ceratosaurus
The widdle arms 😂
Carno's big advantage would be gone after the initial charge, if the fight ever goes to the ground then the bear would have advantage.
In short it would be decided in a moment, despite being a drawn out encounter.
Could u do Kodiak Bear vs Utahraptor!
Lucky for you I do have video on; Utahraptor Vs Grizzly Bear
@@TheOverseerDebates Ok👌I'll watch it! But could u still do Kodiak Bear vs Utahraptor?
@@MrIsaac_12 .
1:13 Carnotaurus had a stiff tail.
Were did you found this Sceen wen the trex is surrounded by mammals
Honestly, what I heard is that the short face bear can run up to 60 km/h which is 37 mph however they probably would’ve ran 35
The dino has the edge in size and intimidation however -- total lack of arms would be a distinct handicap in a carnivore vs. carnivore duel.
Arms can come in pretty "handy."
I wonder how a carnotaur would react to a bear roar.
Simce dinosaurs likely didnt roar like in movies it might just scare it of
The short faced bears actually 6 feet tall at the shoulder and 11 feet tall om to legs
1.35 tons seems like a runt of the liter carno
Should have used Arctotherium angustidens. The largest of them reached around 2 tons. Thats debated some say its about 3500 lbs but to face this dino should go with the upper limit of it at 4500lbs.
The video literally states why Arctotherium angustidens wasn’t used, because the weight estimates are likely inaccurate and there needs to be more research on it
If they were close to equal in size I think it's a 50/50 shot as to who wins. Carnotaurus could land a bite on arctodus front limb and from there it might be game over depending on the bite or maybe land a bite on the neck. On the other hand bears regularly bite the ever loving shit out of each other and fight like Olympic Greco-Roman wrestlers. They're much more stable bipedally than given credit for here. If the arctodus came rushing on all fours and stood up quickly as bears often do, it could bite the carnos neck with it's arms wrapped around. Bears power is often severely underestimated in these types of videos and to this day we have no way of accurately measuring their strength, let alone an extinct bear. Just look at the Sloth Bear vs Bengal Tiger. Yes Bengals do kill them but Sloth Bears often return the favor or scare the Tigers off because it's not worth the risk but then they go drop a 2800lbs Guar. Like I said, if it's close in size 50/50 is probably the most likely outcome, or they just give each other a wide birth.
Wrong, there’s multiple problems with this. While yes, they can stand up on their hind legs, the stability isn’t going to be as good as something like Carnotaurus, especially since they don’t have a large muscular tail to keep them stable. This would leave them vulnerable to being knocked over, especially since when intraspecific conflicts, bears tend to get rag dolled when they’re both standing on their hind legs.
Something like Carnotaurus would have far better stability when it comes to bipedal stance, and it’s not even close. Now for the biting, even with that being said, bears aren’t adapted for landing quick and fatal bites like Felids, and to land such a well placed bite, Arctodus is going to have to keep Carnotaurus in a good place.
One could say sure, the bears strength is underestimated but so are dinosaurs and in general macropredatory reptiles like crocodiles, especially when compared to bears.
I should mention as well unlike canine teeth, ziphodont teeth isn’t dependent on going to softer areas such as the neck, they can go for any area, as along as they get a good bite in, it would cause serious bleeding for the animal.
I wonder what Carno's resting heart rate would be?
Reptiles generally tend to have lower metabolic rates than mammals, leaving them prone to exhaustion after quick bursts of energy.
Caimans have been observed to have resting heart rate in the single digits that rise to the 30s and 40s of bpm when sighting prey.
Conversely, polar bears have a resting heart rate in the 40s and 50s of bpm. This would likely increase during predation and combat, but I haven't found numbers on that.
This would make a big difference in a prolonged fight, with the reptilian Carno tiring out after it's initial attack/struggle.
Fights between similarly sized male Grizzly bears during the mating season can be prolonged encounters. I've seen footage of some lasting well over 10 minutes.
Now I'm unsure if this means the short faced bear would have more stamina than the Carno, given the larger size of the Shortface compared to modern bears.
But if the stark contrast between the metabolic rates of mammals and reptilians applied in this fight, I'd say that the Carno would have a smaller window of opportunity to win than the bear.
Now if the Carno bore a similar metabolic rate to living terrestrial birds like Ostriches or Cassowary, which have resting bpm around the 40s and 50s and a range similar to that of mammals, there wouldn't be as much of a discrepency.
Also for some reason, six flags new england says Carnos may have hunted in packs, although I can't find any other support for that claim. If that was true then the bear would lose as there would likely be more carnos.
It’s very likely Carnotaurus had higher metabolic rates than other reptiles. It was at least an mesotherm, with some studies even suggests that suggests that many dinosaurs were endothermic, having a metabolic rate higher than mammals and closer to that of birds.
There are a lot of mentions of carnotaurus being agile, i thougth he was exepcionally stiff while running because of his rigid tail
Allosaurus vs arctotherium
Angustidens
Allosaurus slams
I would say Carnotaurus would win because the jaws inflict much bigger wound in 1 bite.
Arctodus is strong for sure, but has lower DPS.
Its claws and bite couldn't inflict damage as efficiently as one big bite.
I honestly believe that bears are nature forces and even smaller they would find a way to win
Basically putting a ferret vs a hawk 😂
I first saw it in the game animal revolt battle simulator (arbs)
Why dont you say their stats at the same time from the beginning.
By the time you go to the second animal I forgot the stats of the first
Assuming the bear doesn't get immediately chomped, one could climb a dino like a tree. Dino just better be good with the chomp and shake
Gorilla Vs Rugops
(Small Abelisauridae)
"_Look Like_"
King Kong Vs V-Rex
Rugops can exceed 400kg, it would shred a Gorilla to pieces.
Carnotaurus clearly wasn't a bull
Turns out one Bull can at least kill a bear…
Grizzly bears can decapitate moose in a single strike the Carno would get its neck broken with this much larger and stronger bear or imagine what happens when the bear balls up on one of them legs what I'm getting at is it only takes one from the bear to kill the carno and I just don't see the Carnot one shoting the bear
"Grizzly bears can decapitate moose in a single strike"
- can you substantiate this claim?
- the dinosaur outweighs the bear considerably, you haven't a clue
This is like saying because bear can decapitate mooze they cna decapitate an elephant.
If they could, then why don’t we have certified reports of it then? If they’re capable of doing it, it would very likely be a very small moose
Can you verify these claims,video evidence,photos,or response from scientists ,if not then that is just a made up claim
A carnotaurus is a lot different from a moose believe it or not
Carnotaurus: the 2 ton predatory archosaur whose bite-force is equal to that of a Squirrel ! ( by recent estimates)
Who won?
The bear is a bit tanky but the carnotaurus has that and it can cause some crushing+bleeding damage with that skull and those horns.
Dinoboy has one chance. He fucks up, that bear is gonna throw him to the ground and fight like a bear.
Carnotaurus can literally do the same thing, especially if the bear decides to stand on it’s hind legs
@@denistyrantbears also have thick fur and fat layers, granting increased mobility under hold.
The thick and loose layers allow them to maneuver even with the claws and jaws of the enemy latched onto them.
The muscular and fatty humps they have also protects their spines from back bites.
I'm inclined to aggree that the Carno's success relies entirely on how effective its initial attack is
@@br3hbmc79 Thick fur and fat layers likely wouldn’t be protective against ziphodont teeth.
Carnotaurus had ziphodont teeth which were perfectly designed to slice through flesh, so thick fur and fat is likely not going to protect the bear. What makes matters worse is the bear wouldn’t be used to an animal with ziphodont teeth, since most if not all of it’s competitors had canines, which mainly rely on puncturing in order to inflict deep wounds, something ziphodont teeth doesn’t have to rely on.
So even if the bear isn’t going to have to worry about the overall power of the bite, it’s going to have to worry about the heavy amount of bloodless the Carnotaurus can inflict with it’s quick bites.
big up the carnataurus. so cool that "saurus" starts with a t instead, for no reason! this dinosaur is about that thug life.
The point is that I don’t see where and how the bear could get a kill strike actually at all
I don't think a short faced bear could have taken on a carnotaur,now it would have given a utah raptor a formable match up,!
If they were fighting, the carnotaurus would have it's head lowered to be able to strike, thus increasing the ability for the bear to strike. Not such and easy fight as you make out.
Isn’t it more agreed upon that while Carnotaurus was pretty fast it wasn’t good at turning, and that it had a weak but fast bite.
Those were before the bite force estimates came out, for turning, not really, especially since stiffer tails were better for agility iirc
You should pit a 2 tonne Carnotaurus against a 1.5 tonne Arctotherium.
The video literally mentions why they went with Arctodus simus and not Arctotherium angustidens
Arctotherium anguistidens is 1.1 tonnes
how about carnotaurus vs bull
Carnotaurus negs.
2.1t Theropod with bone crushing jaws and thick hide against a 1.1t Bear who has shorter face compared to an average bear.
Realistically: bear slashes Carnos eyes whilst carno attempts to restrain bear.
Carno is doomed to die.
Even more realistic: carno decides this isn't worth it and runs off.
@@loganshark667idk abt that one 💀
@@loganshark667 yeah because bears are known to be precision strikers that go for the eyes (something that even humans that use their fingers every day cant do). Sure man
@@panagiotismagos3649 I mean, think about it, a carnotorus is going to attempt to bite the bear, which requires putting its head in reach of the bear. by the placement of the eyes of the carnotorus, It's most likely going to either hit in the eye or rather close if our short faced bear decides to go for a slap or slash... if the bear fails to slash the eyes out of the carno, it's not gonna end well for the bear...
But realistically, the bear should end up ripping the carnos' eyes out... unless the carno bites the bears arms, which would make everything a lot more complicated...
Unless I'm forgetting something important...
@@loganshark667you are forgetting many things important, the size for example in the first place the bear is never going to precision strike a carno thats not just how they work what it will happen is that the bear is going to strike the dace of the carno were the damage will be superficial the size difference is too much.
After the second punch the carno is going to grab one of the paws of bear and serilusly mangle it or drag the bear as a whole.
Smilodon Popular vs Utah Raptor
I think tier zoo did that
Dinosaur time
Carnotaurus will destroy the short faced bear. Carnivore dinosaurs should be atleast a little lighter than carnivore mammals to make it fair.
The carnotaurus from Dinosaur and Terra Nova are fucking MASSIVE. Iguanadons are compared to Allosauruses in terms of size and weight. A carnotaurus dwarfing that and standing up to a sauropod is insane. The carnotaurus in Terra Nova is completely faster than a jeep going full speed as it was able to catch up with it in under at least a few seconds. Fiction and movies do carnotaurus clean.
Carno was designed for speed and eating smaller creatures. If the fight is tipped in the bears favor the carno can just... run away
I think carnotaurus wins, it had a strong bite and it was fast. It's the best of both worlds, the bear will be nothing but lunch for the meat eating bull.
The Carnotaurus had Devil like hornes
But it doesn’t have hands
Ceratosaurus would’ve been a better matchup imo
Barinasuchus vs carno? Who would win
That’s an interesting match up. Haven’t looked too deeply into Barinasuchus, however, I think it fairs a lot better than Arctodus simus.
Man are we that bored lol
So many therapods gave up practical usage of their fore limbs. I've always wondered what drove this. Seems like losing a big advantage. A waste of bipedalism.
In an exchange for more powerful jaws, it’s the reason why Theropods tend to have higher bite forces than mammals at similar size
Bear win!
Ahh, PoT trying to be realistic here, giving the pycno such a weak bite compared to allo and dasp
Why do you say gay? We all heard that if you go to 12.50 you see
Short face bear is getting folded but it depends
Conclusion : Dinosaurs slams 🦕🦖
This isnt even a fight...
That bear could never out monnerver a Carnotosaurus
wrong carnotaurus is not related to giganotosaurus or t rex.