Conservative Student SCHOOLS University Professor On Trump And 2nd Amendment
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
- Go to ground.news/LF... to see through media bias and get balanced news coverage. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
Watch LFR Jojo's video...
• Aggressive Student CUR...
and start your journey towards unbiased news today!
--ROAD TO 300K!--
LFR JOJO REACTION
0:31- Beginning
1:00 - Americans who are into guns
2:30 - Socialism suck
6:50 -What are the uses of guns?
9:00 -What's easier to control shootings.
11:00 - 18 y.o's having access to guns
13:20 - The stereotypes about gun owners
VIDEOS USED WHEN EDITING:
------------------
MY BROTHERS FIRST NOVEL!: The Tragedy of Madeline the Demon: Gluttony (Part I) (The Tragedy of Madeline the Demon Saga)
MERCHANDISE: lfr-jojo-merch...-spring...
LFR FAMILY: / lfrfamily
Like and subscribe!
Business Email: Jovaneconom@gmail.com
Follow Me On Instagram: LfrJojo
Follow Me On Twitter: TRNLVAN
THE PO BOX:
LFR JOJO
P.O. Box 262
Lothian, MD 20711
Cashapp: $JovanHall01
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
[Beat Prod. by YoungBerry Beats]
Hashtags:
Amazing, her parents should be proud of the intelligent, based and strong daughter they have raised. Stand your ground against Socialism.
Nooo she is basically an idiot....Drink a beer?....ugh....horrible representative...total ignoramus...and if she does drink beer and go shooting she is stupid too.... AND she said "well there are professionals around and we're just "like" drinking one beer, not getting drunk.." If there is ONE professional around no one is drinking SHT! But water or gatorade... Stupid AND ignorant and if she does have a concealed carry it should be revoked...WHY?? Because by her answers probably drinks and carries...100% illegal....unfknbelievable...schools professor...my a
Her parents should be proud that she thinks one of the most disgusting, narcissistic, transparent, greasy MF on the face of the earth is "amazing". Hilarious.
THAT'S A GREAT AMERICAN GIRL ! God bless this young Lady !
And I think also great parenting, cause she was well informed and educated.
Gives me hope
100 percent!
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 This what a Real freedom loving American looks like. TRUMP 24
Shall not be infringed.
“And to the Republic, for which it stands” not democracy. So many details are almost purposely skipped over now a days.
It’s college. Noting is being infringed.
@@epgamer1145 Its about 2A and gun ownership, try to keep up.
@@epgamer1145Watch the video silly person!
@@triamaria ok and?
The fact that it's a RIGHT and a safeguard against tyrannical government seems to be lost
This administration is a perfect example of a Tyranny government.
Absolutely
Also that criminals will have guns regardless of any "law", and innocent citizens won't have a means to defend themselves. Almost sounds like a scenario a criminal would want. Tyrannical governments can only do things if people with common sense don't speak up. BTW, this "professor" is an idiot.
Yeah that’s in many ways more important or at least equally important as the right to defend life and property. But that never came up in this debate. That’s the first thing I mention when speaking to anti-gun people
Yeah seriously. TYRANNY
What none of these students seem to be able to think about is that criminals never have to ask for permission and will always be getting guns.
Yes but making them illegal drives up the price a whole lot which means most criminals cannot get them. That is what happened in Countries where they were banned. So that argument does not work.
Exactly. And not just these students. It comes from the anti-gun lobby, and all political viewpoints, that follow that anti-gun rhetoric. "If we outlaw guns, we will be safer" ...But, what they are either ignoring, or not seeing, is that if we outlaw guns, we will be left with only the criminals having the guns. And with this, we must remember, that when seconds count, police are (at best) minutes away.
@@ozzybloke-craig3690 the price at the store has nothing to do with the street price for a gun, criminals can afford guns especially since guns are as often bartered as they are purchased. I was once involved with people that were less than legal in the majority of things they did so I do know first hand about the street market for guns, it's not what you seem to think at all.
@@ozzybloke-craig3690infringing the human rights of an entire country to hurt the 2nd hand market is kinda wild though
@@ozzybloke-craig3690 ive never owned a legal gun personally. I can still get them
The best sweatshirt ever, "Socialism Sucks".
She is the best and tells it true.
I'm not sure how anybody can come to that conclusion when no one has ever actually tried to do legitimate socialism.
@@kumada84they try for about 5 minutes, but then the takeover begins, and you have tyranny.
@@kumada84It's been tried over and over, and it sucks!
@kumada84 Your defense on the subject says more about your ignorance than it does against anyone who says, "socialism sucks."
Maybe, just maybe, the reason why "it's never been done right before" is because it was never meant to be the definition you want it to be.
How hard is it to understand that if you criminalize guns, then only criminals will have them?
They took away the people's right to have guns in England in 1998 and knife crime shot through the roof
A criminal government ? For the U S Constitution and Amendments spends more words saying what government must never do , than on what government may or must do .
@@lisaamerson1547That's because the people who wrote it knew first-hand what happens when you don't specify what the government is and isn't allowed to do.
And many of those criminals wear badges.
In counties such as Australia, the buyback of weapons made guns far less accessible and far more costly, this helps keep them out of the hands of criminals. The shear number of guns in the US is what makes them so easily obtainable for criminals.
That wasn’t so bad. She seemed to have a great head on her shoulders. She was happy to be there, pleasant, informed, patient and respectful. That’s really refreshing. You can tell she’s the active sort actually participating as opposed to being always online and not really having any direct experience.
My permit was written in 1789.
what permit??
@@ATX51232 This permit: ruclips.net/video/uq6nBigMnlg/видео.htmlsi=_JNO3-EKsIcPkjpc
im not even American an Emglishmen ,in England and even i know what he is on about 😂@@ATX51232
2nd Amendment hon.
Hear hear 💯
Well, it's not your right as a student, but as an American *_Citizen._*
I don't think it works that way; any visitor in the US has the same laws apply to them. All of them.
Throughout history, tyrannical governments have made it so the people, the serfs, cannot own weapons. Only the elite. That is why our founding fathers put rights in the constitution that the people have the right to bear arms. It was to prevent our government from becoming tyrannical.
@@YoChocoTube if it is a student from another country and here on a visa they wouldn't have those same rights, thatd be insane and every terrorist would enroll as a student.
some rights like the 2nd amendment and right to vote etc are restricted to U.S. Citizens.
so the OP was correct in their statement.
not to be a dck, but you need to learn more about the term you use, citizen
it's your right as a human
Why don't they ever say guns are to protect our homes and if law abiding citizens give up guns the criminals will still have guns
They do. The leftists don't care.
Or why don’t they say that our gums are to protect against government?
@@theentrepreneur607 they do all the time. The lefties don't care.
“If you outlaw guns then only outlaws will have guns.”
Exactly, criminals will always find a way, and moreover guns that are non registered, so they couldn’t be traced. So citizens should have the right to own a gun to protect themselves.
One thing that wasn't talked about when street shootings was being mentioned was that most, if not nearly all, the street shooters obtained their guns illegally, not purchase from a gun dealer and did all the paperwork.
I'm sorry I didn't read the comments before I made mine;basically I agreed.
They don’t care about black people killing other black people. They only care about the .00001 of unarmed black people killed by white police officers
Not once did I hear why the 2A is there: to make the government never have ultimate tyranny over it's people.
My Cherokee ancestors would agree 💯💯💯💯
Idk if I'm naive but how would one defend themselves vs armored vehicles and airstrikes if The Government decided to take over it's people (will never happen even if every gun was removed tomorrow because they already won if you consider how terribly they use our tax dollars and over-tax us to the point where we can fund multiple wars and aid overseas)? Don't get me wrong it would be harder and it would result in more death as they couldn't just snatch people without a fire fight but purely in a war how would rifles and handguns beatout military grade weaponry and vehicles?
Professor Beta: "It's impossible to get a gun in Columbia."
Columbian Cocaine Cartel:😂
She said a couple of times that it "depends on the type of gun". Why? No it doesn't. "Shall not be infringed". And no, she doesn't own "assault rifles".
She’s young and nervous. She’s never been instructed on how to speak about guns to gun control activists. She’s trying to keep to the left while talking out of fear of judgement from her liberal classmates.
Yes she absolutely blew that opportunity on AR meaning “assault rifle”. AR has alway been ArmoLite Rifle! The liberals have falsely branded AR as “assault rifle”. Any object or thing used to attack or kill somebody now becomes the assault weapon in the court of law. So a hand, foot, or stick all technically becomes assault weapons. Fact… far many more people are killed by beat downs then AR’s! It’s not the weapon, it’s the person who is killing or harming another person.
Correct, she just owns rifles. The assault was added to scare people like those in this class. Like if we added assault vehicle to every car some may be afraid to get in one and drive. Yet its a tool that can kill many people with very little effort. Words matter and we have been programed to think things are dangerous by adding stupid words to things that can improve your life and protect it.
I watch his lectures all the time...he is fair to everyone, he makes people think outside the box and I don't believe he ever takes "sides". He will appear to take sides to spur a debate, but I really love his teachings!!!
Agreed, I enjoy his videos.
Yeah he generally doesn't take a side but sometimes it comes through as he heavily favors one side over the other but yeah we need teachers like him but that's cause no matter how neutral you are there is always some of your personal beliefs will be displayed but he does try to be as neutral and get people to talk about things
Love him he’ll disagree just to get ppl to think
Agree. I think Prof. understands that the "opposing" students are uninformed and will likely have fear or bias against guns, and will need more support and coaching in order to have a conversation. Also, firearms fanatics that literally wear it on their sleeves (or laptops) are typically more outspoken and can discuss the topic without help and guidance.
@@tauntdragoon In all fairness, he is a self-admitted liberal and doesn't hide it - but, I would disagree that he favors that side. It's more that he understands it better so when supporting the discussion, he can offer more support to the side he understands. The important thing is that he's very transparent about his biases and knows they exist and does a fair job mitigating them.
I feel like I'd have MORE questions for the ppl who are anti-gun
Theyre wonderfully ignorant to life off campus.
I like the Professor, I’ve watched several of his videos on this channel and he’s really good at making people think outside their box.
The girl did a great job as well.
This so called prof. Is a complete cxxt!
God bless this young person.
She sounds very informed & respectful. Some people can learn a lot from her 👍🇬🇧🇬🇧👏👏
We need more educators like this guy. He is always stoking open minded debates and playing devil's advocate to both sides.
All a firearm is is an equalizer.
It gives those of us who don't stand much of a chance out there against a real threat a chance.
You can restrict, ban, and outlaw firearms, but you can't remove intent to harm and kill - it will always be there.
As will guns. Just because they're banned and outlawed doesn't mean they don't exist, and won't be used.
The professor does dismantle white privilege myths and shit. So props to him for that
As an Australian, Australians have been socialised to believe that all guns are dangerous.Most have never been around a gun and many cannot conceive of the American attitude of casually being around guns.
All guns are dangerous.
Yes guns are dangerous in the wrong hands. So why do yall feel safer only allowing governments and their entities having them? Yall trust governments that much? Countries have been taken over because the citizens couldn't fight back. Yall think the American government wouldn't take over?! And yall will never be able to take all the guns away in America at this point. We have more guns than people. We aren't giving them up because the world is scared of things they are not familiar with and were told they are too dangerous to have in civilians hands. Its all about proper training and knowledge. More people die by cars, alcohol and drugs here in America. More use it for suicide than homicide in America. Guns are not the problem. Its who uses the gun and the intention.
@galadine12 So are kitchen knives and toasters. So are cars.
@@fibanocci314 Yup. True.
This professor was actually very moderate and level headed regardless of what his views are. We need more of this and the world would be a better place.
I'm in England and I've had a discussion about guns with my eldest nephew last year he was dead against guns, so I said to him if a criminal was going to shoot you would it be better to have a gun to stop them or not he said i don't want to argue about it, this year we had the same discussion and he said you'll never get rid of guns in America, people need to defend themselves
This guy is awesome, he makes you think.
For real!! I enjoy watching his lectures on his channel because he makes people think. Something to many supposed "teachers and professors" don't encourage let alone teach these days!! Critical thinking is sooo important!! I don't necessarily always agree with his takes on things, but I do have a great deal of respect for him for sure. Best wishes to you and yours!!
"Wouldn't restrictions reduce the rate of shootings?" The highest volume of shootings come from places with the strictest gun laws. They fail to comprehend that criminals will be the only ones with weapons if all weapons are illegal for civilians to possess. It's hard for those from submissive cultures like Australia, Canada, and the UK, to understand the erosion of rights once there is freedom from consequence. The British banned knives over 6 inches. Now it's illegal to defend yourself from burglary or SA in the UK, and you're a criminal if you defend another from it.
Any rights stripped from the citizen is a right granted to a criminal.
I agree with most of your points, particularly the metric of criminal possession! However, it’s
not illegal to defend yourself in the UK, The current UK law permits people to defend themselves or others, to prevent crime or to protect property using force that was reasonable in the circumstances as they believed them to be. What constitutes `reasonable force’ will depend upon the circumstances of each case and is a matter for the courts to decide.”
This means that while you are allowed to use force to defend yourself, anything falling outside of ‘reasonable force’ will not qualify. For example, if the measure are obviously excessive or the act was in response to historic violence. However, if you can prove that your actions were necessary given what you believed to be true at the time, then this is acceptable and you have acted within the law.
My feelings on gun laws are mixed - (my father made Kentucky rifles when I was little) Just to give an example - my husband is from Italy. Italy has VERY strict gun laws. You can get a gun IF you can prove you NEED one - like you own a jewelry store. If, for example, you have a gun for that reason the gun can't go anywhere BUT that store. You can't have it in your car, your home, etc. IF you want a gun to shoot at a range - you can use one at a range and it stays there. Italians seem unconcerned about not having guns. They can't understand why we need or want them. I am not saying I do or do not share their view.. only what my interactions and experience with the culture has been. I do feel less afraid there might be a shooting when I hear a rowdy gang of kids and we are walking home at night. Again, my feelings on this subject are mixed. I used to be completely anti-gun - but lately have been a little more liberal in my thinking.
Earlier he calls her a gun nut and says he's joking...she gets him back calling him mentally unstable for using pot and laughs. I love this girl.
At 13:11 she is asked if there was anything that she wished people would ask her about guns. My answer would have been this:
"To me it's not about what they ask...I will answer any question. What I wish people would do is ask in the spirit of dialogue and with a heart to understand and learn. I wish people would stop spouting things they heard from other people who aren't qualified to make statements about topics and just do their own heartfelt research. Stop trying to 'stump the chump' and 'trap the chap'. Just be honest about it."
I think there is a simple argument for the 2A. It’s deterrence. Police cannot prevent crime, they are only able to respond after the crime occurs and arrest someone, then the DA needs to prosecute, and the judge needs to sentence. All of that does not create enough deterrence to criminal activity. If you have a gun, then criminals should be deterred because they know that they might die. Responsible gun ownership generates a strong deterrence against criminal activity, and that alone is good enough argument for the 2A, besides the idea that the purpose is simply to protect citizens against government overreach and tyranny, which is also an important argument.
The simple argument is that it is your right as a human and not something the government gives you. As they didn't grant it, they can't take it away if we are still free.
Ask these kids: If I gave you a gun,would you use it to commit a crime?..Of course they'd say they wouldn't,but they'd think that everyone outside of that campus would..
I love this!!! I love that hes making students have conversations. Something thats missing in this country. Outside of this classroom one side says the other is wrong and doesnt want to hear the other or why they think or feel the way they do without getting their feelings hurt and having a mental breakdown. Hes engaging the students to ask questions instead of fear mongering and forcing his opinions on them. Very impressed with the way he is running this class. Asking questions is the key to learning, Instead of fear driven decisions based on less than factual reality.
Boys she's a keeper. 😜
Seriously, though!! My first thought was, sheesh!! If only my brother could find him a keeper like her!! She would fit well into our family and circle!! 😅
I enjoy this professor and I like how he gets people to talk instead of just scream at each other
Ask one question.
If I was in a country with no guns do criminals still have guns? Answer is yes.
Next also ppl still kill ppl with knives.
On top of that if the government decides to take your rights. Well you know.
Young folks are always liberal and older folks are always conservative. So, if you’re young and conservative, you’re just ahead of your time.
Freedom of speech is more about freedom than talking, just as your 2nd amendment right is too protect yourself and property, it's about freedom not shooting guns
This girl is FIRE, we need more people like her, most people dont even know how to work a bow or gun, but the fact that she works a bow and a gun is BADASS
Nooo she is basically an idiot....Drink a beer?....ugh....horrible representative...total ignoramus...and if she does drink beer and go shooting she is stupid too.... AND she said "well there are professionals around and we're just "like" drinking one beer, not getting drunk.." If there is ONE professional around no one is drinking SHT! But water or gatorade... Stupid AND ignorant and if she does have a concealed carry it should be revoked...WHY?? Because by her answers probably drinks and carries...100% illegal....unfknbelievable...schools professor...my a
I didn’t like that the girl who “loves guns” was kind of cornered to defend her beliefs alone. But she handled it well. Good for her!
I really wish she would have explained another huge reason for the 2nd Amendment. It's also there in case of a tyrannical government. The Aussie can make the claim that yes there would be far less crime, however if the government want to impose themselves you are at their mercy.
You’re on social media; the Government already has control of you and they are doing it incognito. All of those AI technology products you have are also subtly controlling you and you don’t even know.
To any commentator here who may try to hate or dunk on this particular professor, he regularly asks pointed questions from BOTH conservative and liberal students in various thought experiments to challenge and explore their worldview and to educate his students on the various rights. This is how teaching should be. The manner of questioning IS supposed to be _probematic_ cos unproblematic or 'correct way' questioning will only arrive at safe answers.
I would have loved to have him as a prof.
Great video as always!! I really enjoy listening to this guys lectures but even more so when you add your thoughts and comments to the conversation!! Keep up the amazing work my friend!! Appreciate it more than you know!! There are such important conversations happening right now, finally!! Best wishes to you and yours and Us ALL!! 💖🙏💖🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
I can't imagine why she is referring to her AR-15 as an assault rifle, when it is definitively not a military weapon.
It's all based on fear
This professor is actually great. He does stuff like this all the time with all sorts of touchy subjects and seems to be very open but not letting his brain fall out
I'm pro gun and anti gun at the same time, I'm pro when it come to citizen having one and anti for nutcases to have one.
@9:45 "...in Pennsylvania, it's easier to get a conceal carry permit than a lot of other States..."
Thankfully, at least for now. Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Article I Section 21:
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
It's indoctrination, not education these days
I'd argue that this teacher is educational but I agree with your over all sentiment
That's called good questioning. As someone who is a 2A absolutist I think these questions are great 8:37 it's not that he's teaming up against her, he is teaching the two ignorant ones
He's fair....but should've also pointed out that it's a RIGHT to combat tyrannical government.
Unless she has a VERY special permit, I seriously doubt she owns an "Assault Rifle".
Right. An AR-15 is not an assault rifle.
it's a fake name like "social justice"
What is a assault rifle?
An assault rifle is a military firearm that can switch between semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. The AR-15 is a semi-automatic rifle, meaning it only fires one shot each time the trigger is pulled. The AR stands for “ArmaLite Rifle” not assault rifle or automatic rifle.
@@Net1085 Exactly. You would think that our Ivy league educated "news" anchors and Leftist Politicians would know this.
I used to be anti-gun, or really just non-opinionated on the matter, but after watching interviews and seeing the crime issue in NY increase, it made me more pro-gun lol. Personally don’t think I’ll be owning one any time soon but there are already processes you have to go to as a civilian to attain a gun and even more so for rifles and stuff so what’s the problem? Also, when regular law abiding citizens don’t have concealed carry, what makes people think regular criminals- like ppl who actively commit crime- are gonna abide by those law restrictions on guns? Like what makes people think a gang member in Chicago is not gonna find a gun illegally or a thief is not gonna find a way to get a gun to threaten their victims… that’s just my thought process though.
Anyway, stare safe everyone. And remember that Jesus loves you. Protect yourselves and your families the best you can🫶🏾
The professor is the only one who is “ Really Really Interested In Guns”. He can’t stop talking about them.
I like this girl.
Everyone needs to be well trained in firearms. You don’t need a permit you need to fill out an FFL application and then be approved by the State police’s background check. If your state makes you have a permit they are doing so illegally.
3 dudes break into your house with intentions to do despicable harm to you and your loved ones you live 10 miles from the nearest police station.. what do you do? And yes, it doesn't happen to everyone everyday but it does happen everyday to someone
If I have never done anything wrong, why would you assume that I would start doing something wrong just because I turn 18?
I've probably only seen 30 to 40 of your videos, LFR. With that, you have grown wiser. The first and only time I have seen this Professor's thought videos has been through you. This is a much better analysis than that of your earlier videos. Today, I have officially subscribed to your channel! Thanks.😁
That was basically 3 against 1. I don’t think she should have mentioned drinking a beer and then going to the gun range. That didn’t sound good.
My husband is retired military after 23 years. He has his carry permit in several states and has several guns. I have a rifle and pistol myself. My husband actually works at a gun range and is a range boss there.
The year after Texas and Florida made it legal to carry concealed the crime rate dropped significantly. Now the innocent can protect themselves.
She was just being honest...people drink a beer when they go to private ranges all the time, you just don't get drunk.
Thank you!!! Alcohol and guns=100% illegal...
She's is intelligent but not because she owns guns. What she has is common sense and basic logic about guns which is what most legal gun owners have common sense and logic.
Commons sense and logic says "she is basically an idiot....Drink a beer?....ugh....horrible representative...total ignoramus...and if she does drink beer and go shooting she is stupid too.... AND she said "well there are professionals around and we're just "like" drinking one beer, not getting drunk.." If there is ONE professional around no one is drinking SHT! But water or gatorade... Stupid AND ignorant and if she does have a concealed carry it should be revoked...WHY?? Because by her answers probably drinks and carries...100% illegal....unfknbelievable...schools professor...my a
What annoy me the most is how people treat "guns", a lifeless product, as a source of the problem, the ideas that has been ingrained into people's head. Most of these same people would want to lecture you to not stereotype other generalization, like race or culture, but then they themselves stereotype the possession of "guns". I don't hear the same sentiment about knives, crossbows, cars, or anything else people like to collect or practice as their hobbies. Just like anything else, when a product is place in the wrong hands, can be deadly, knives and cars kill people also.
She is VERY honest
Much respect !
FYI that woman doesnt own an assault rifle, assault rifles have been illegal in the US for 30 years now. AR15 stands for ArmaLite Rifle 15, its the company that makes the rifle and the model number.
Shows what you know, if you jump through the hoops, you "an American Citizen" can own fully auto rifles, not many do because of the cost and things like if you own one the feds can come to your house at ANY TIME and enter, without probable cause or a warrant...
Actually if your reference to assault rifle would mean being fully automatic and semi automatic it would mean military style rifle which IS legal to own in the US with the proper registration and payment of the $200 tax stamp.
You shouldn’t be drinking and operating a firearm. I am pro 2A but that’s just stupid. If you can’t drink and drive, you shouldn’t be drinking and shooting 🤦
Yeah, she _never_ should have made that comment. It's illegal.
El_Ophelia
If im not mistaken in TX there are no laws that specifically restrict someone from possessing a firearm and consuming alcohol, it's only when you’re intoxicated, does it become illegal. So technically you are permitted to have a few beers as long as your blood alcohol level is less than . 08.
Not stupid, lol. Having a beer doesn't make you drunk.
@@TheLaughingMustache-oh5ff It does for someone with a low alcohol threshold. It would for me. One should *never* drink and handle firearms, period. You don't have to get drunk for it to be a problem. She really shouldn't have said that.
If u have on beer it’s not gonna get u drunk un less you’re jus a weak mf and a lightweight
I love this girl. Proud to be American. Safe and educated.
This professor is great too. He’s being partial to everyone involved here. Open minded- how we should all be.
Someone also needs to tell the students that most gun interactions are good guys stopping bad guys. (Outside of gang violence)
Her dad is her favorite person in the world! Live long my friend
Good for her!!!! So many adults don’t have the courage to stand up for their beliefs and are afraid of persecution.
He wanted a more political discussion and didn't get it because the two seemed more open minded and really wasn't anti gun.
Ticking me off from the get go. So demeaning to the young lady like his opinion is the only one that matters.
99% of the Alpha males in the audience were attracted to her. Most of the beta males (cult left) were intimidated by her. Beautiful woman!
She’s tougher than most of these guys. The girls think she’s a badass.
It’s not impossible to get a gun anywhere in the world if you’re a criminal. It’s only impossible for the law abiding citizens of those countries.
She made a large mistake saying she owns assault rifles, unless she has some select fire tax stamped machine guns in her safe she does not have "assault rifles". I know she is nervous and put on the spot and she is young and that's why i wish i could have inhabited her body for this conversation to make the stronger points and to explain things in greater detail. I feel though if i did that everyone's eyes would glaze over with the amount of information and nuance.
Like "you would have never said "Drink a BEER" and go shooting, what an ass, what a terrible representative...oh and "oh well it's only ONE beer and there are professionals around so its not like we're getting drunk"...NO If a professional was around there would be ZERO alcohol! I couldn't believe she said that...smfh...
My only issue with having "Beer" is if at a professional gun range. However, people do go into the woods and shoot still. My other thought is this. We train our body and minds to respond appropriately under stressful situations. So if a person is out with friends drinking socially, they shouldn't know how to properly use a weapon when under the influence? What about military personnel knowing how to perform under pressure? So my thought is more of...knowing how to use a firearm safely is excellent, but more people should go through extra training to learn how to use a firearm for situational awareness while in a stressful situation.
@@metricwrencher8702 It is illegal to be in possesssion of a fire arm and under the influence..it doesn't really matter someone's personal opinion. It is Illegal, irresponsible, foolish, extremely dangerous...Drunk drivers are more likely to kill someone with their motor vehicle...someone under the influence will also be more likely to have a neglegent discharge...all the rest of your reasoning is moot.
@whitebeardguitar so you don't believe in extra training for situational awareness nor Wolff's Law. Also, with your logic of thinking Marijuana needs to stay illegal since it does cause a delay in neuro synapsis for up to 2 weeks from 1 inhale.
@@metricwrencher8702 lol OODA LOOP bro. Don't be drunk or I don't want you in a fox hole next to me. No one said anything about pot...so don't add to my comments or assume anything about my logic except what I was specifically commenting on.
She's sounds like a responsible gun owner. But the red flag laws could get you killed. When a couple goes through a divorce, their lawyers advise their clients to get a restraining order on the other spouse. The gun owner may have no history of threatening their spouse through out the marriage. And many many divorces become vindictive. Red flag laws will strip you of you guns if you have a restraining order on you. Now your personal protect of intruders goes out the window.
The young lady was very knowledgeable about guns and gun law. She didn't seem like she was feeling attacked. You had some interesting points ss well. Thanks for yhe listen!
Yeah he was totally stacking the situation.
This professor keeps interjecting himself into the debate instead of letting it happen organically. It's a form of CONTROL and he knows it.
I like these talks most times, he is a professor instagating diffrent/difficult topics in students to help with learning amongst opposite cultures. And, hopefully he is being honest in his leading of the conversation as a professor to not necessarily inflame any one particular view, but to draw out more meaningful debate/conversation.
I am SO proud of her.
We absolutely NEED more young adults like this young lady, who are educated, informed, and comfortable, with both her rights, and also owning, and operating firearms, and other defensive or protective tools, properly and responsibly.. it's unfortunate that most people who watch this are so surprised, some even shocked, at the fact that a young female student, such as herself, has a firearm, and is well educated and experienced with them.. it would be a safer country for more responsible Americans, especially young women, had her background. If I had a daughter who attended a university, i would feel more confident about her safety if she were permitted to carry a gun, was educated and experienced with it, and was confident and responsible to protect herself if necessary..
Trying to shame & doxxed her.
This professors sets up conversations for his students to teach them to think critically and to assume things. She’s great, but she’s not exactly schooling him. He gave her a platform to educate people. Kudos to this Penn State professor.
The fact that this is a college class is insanity. What a complete waste of time for all these students. College is such a scam! This girl knew her stuff and did not need this class to help her communicate her perspective to people who don’t agree with her.
My first question was... why did he get one gun person and team up two people against her?
That's the kind of crap they do on The View.
I like that when he goes up to the woman sitting. He is not shaming her for it, they're all having a laugh. This is how things used to be, this is how things should be. Open discussion, protecting the freedom to disagree even if you don't support their position.
Most Australians have only ever seen a gun on a cops hip they have zero understanding of them, we have 26 million people and only 900k licences and the numbers are going down
The student from Australia is using "liberal" in a different context than the political definition. He's essentially asking if the process allows too many people to access firearms more easily than they should.
Great content.. your dad has you going down the right path!!! Did she ask questions or axe questions?? lol keep up the good work!
She did really good with being put on the spot and more or less being in a "hostile" environment answering those questions.
He's establishing a dialogue. Why is this a problem?
I don't think the teacher is in wrong here, if he hadn't done this we wouldn't have gotten this interaction.
That was actually a very productive conversation. I hope it changed some minds
Yeah this professor should be basically be fired, a disgrace honestly.... Young lady handled this awkard embrassment very well. Respect to her.
Owning a gun is to protect yourself from U S. government. That is why the second amendment is important and shall not be infringed. The first thing a dictatorship does is to remove guns from the population.
Did he really say what about if the person doesn't have any priors? Then your rights shouldn't be curtailed. That's like saying you haven't had any driving violations but we aren't going to let you buy a car because you could get in a wreck and kill someone.
Yes he is siding and coaching them…..nice job with your commentary, thank you.
He's leading the whole conversation and the lesson. He is trying to teach as opposed to listening to what's real. Nothing but programming
She’s everything awesome in 2024! God bless you! MAGA 2024!
People are so ignorant. Good people with guns stop bad people with guns. Period. Also, criminals would never follow gun laws.. meaning the good people would be left with no weapon to defend themselves. Common sense.
The largest thing that baffles me with those opposing guns, conceal carry, 2nd ammendment, etc.
How many shootings take place in an area that allows conceal carry or open carry?
VS
How many shootings where guns are prohibited?
Answer: Mass shootings, aimless shootings and killings HAPPEN WHEN GUNS ARENT ALLOWED!
As she pointed out, the texas shooting, if the security guard wasnt armed, how much more death would happen?
If a mass shooting, school, theatre etc happened and gun toting americans could have guns there, THEY WOULDNT HAPPEN!
These predators and murderers target areas they know they wont have resistence PURPOSEFULLY!
If everyone carried, there would 100% be less crime because good righteous moral people would stand up and have the ability to stand up against those attempting criminal acts.
Do you notice how confident the gun toting beer drinking chick is compared to the folks asking questions? This young lady gets 2 thumbs up and heartfelt salute from me ❤❤