Everytime our society develops a new technology, the people are told how many human lives will be saved from starvation, saved from cancer or diabetes, or saved from human error at high speeds...but what really happens is the technology is weaponized,
Good money in war .It s what got us outa the last depression ,and 1 of the most highly decorated soldier s, Smedley Butler wrote a best selling book called ,War is a Racket.
I don't know of any technology that was supposed to save people from cancer. Cigarette filters? Those are an improvement but not a solution. Are you talking about vaccines? Those work. Genetically modified organisms? There have been laudable successes. Seatbelts improve survival outcomes. Diabetes is a disease of capitalism. I must be missing something.
AI cannot hold my hand or cry with me when my mother is dying. If people agree with this vision for the future of humanity, the world is in serious trouble.
Thank you for saying that! Harai is IMO a brilliant techno-despot who envisions all of humanity being treated like nothing more than waking flesh with their minds, may even free will, controlled by AI --- Never forget -- this utterly depraved person like Klaus Schwab and the WEF are pushing the mantra of: *You will own nothing* And if they get their way, that will include your body, mind and free will. The very definition of a dystopian nightmare brought to life.
@@arturmatik What's "real" about our emotions? We are taught and told to act, feel and behave in a certain way. Over time, people will realize this. Resistance to change is futile. You or I can't do anything about it.
This is very true about doctors and the medical profession in general, people have this extremely incorrect assumption that only low end manufacturing jobs or manual labor jobs will be replaced with AI/robots, but there are VERY many high end jobs that require 4-10 years of college that will be replaced as well, doctors, surgeons, pharmacists, stock brokers, accountants, bankers, etc,etc. All easily replaced by AI.
No its not, where is the prof of that? Watson only out perform doctors when you put the right symptons. How well will do this made up future were you get a body fluids analises everyday? The actual doctors use a process: patiente feel the symptons, doctor discover the cause, doctor prescribe the cure. Will we have such advance AI that dont make errors on all this process too? Its a very simplistic view for a complex problem and thats not right when deciding the future.
Hangrid1 You seem to forget that doctors currently make errors all the time, yes AI in 20-30 years will make diagnoses with 10x more accuracy and 10x less errors than even the top doctors. Same with surgeons, even brain surgery will be done by AI, automated brain surgery.
Exactly. Even the best human surgeon in the world can't see at the micro meter scale, nor move their limbs at even the millimeter scale with repeatable accuracy.
Im a mechanical engineer and as far as i know there isnt a AI that grew a conscious to conduct her actions, meaning it always do what is program to do. It can learn with her mistakes like google translator does but cant evolve the language, for example, that said it would be possible to use the AI to do the simple and linear processes but never to use instinct to solve problems, unless it can simulate them. There are too much we dont know about our own body to program a AI to solve them, as for the self driving car is a simple process of going from one place to another in a safe environment so it have less potencial for errors. Being a surgeon or doctor is more about making the right decisions them to have the best performance so i dont see it being made in a near future.
Hangrid1 Doctors already have even worse limitations on their own brains with recalling memory and overall knowledge, as a computer can use a neural net of all knowledge in existence within seconds. Also this video is about 20-30 years from now, that is comparable to going back to 1986, which only one year prior the very first domain name was registered, and in home desktops weren't even commonplace, etc,etc,etc. The advancements by 2036-2046 will be unfathomable.
Economists in the 1960's noticed that productivity was rising exponentially and predicted the leisure society because, at some point, most people could abstain from work because they could afford not to, but that only works if wealth is distributed equitably. Instead, wealth continued to concentrate into a few hands and the benefits leisure have accrued to an opulent class with the vast majority of people becoming all but expendable the eyes of those who now own the world, and they are being treated as such. Your correct. It is not a prophecy. It is the world in which we live today. If AI were to deliver the benefits that you've outlined in your presentation under today's ethos, mass genocide would be a very real possibility...
Humans are so creative as soon as they get out of mindless task the human mind will truly show itself watch in our lifetime. This is just the beginning 😎
It's great that more and more people are talking about the coming Labourpocalypse. The problem, as Harari put it, is not in the loss of a job but in the tremendous shift in political power it will bring, In the creation of a vast useless class and the social revolution or mass culling, it will unavoidably bring. The communist upheaval together with the french revolutions will seem like a pleasant afternoon in the garden compared with the chaos that is coming.
good work, but it would be better if Dr Yuval Noah Harari appreciate the problem was not the machine and now the AI, but mankind leadership. In Nature most higher animal like elephants, the leader lead to better grazing area and resources like salt and water, but has similar amount as others for self. Their reward is respect. Not wealth. Mankind leadership used to be wise in the same way. but now those with power and leadership take everything they can and leave very little for others. This accumulations of power and resources is the cause of problem rather than AI or machine. The Future of mankind is governed how much wisdom the leaders exercise. Not what aid mankind use to do routine jobs. MG1
how come comments like these don't make it to the top of the list? aah, the algorithm selection moderating the comments must have been programmed to select real world dumbed down entertainment variety comments to the top of the list. very insightful perspective however!
With due respect, sir, I might wonder if you're really seeing the big picture here. Why would mankind be governed by a human, a governor, a president or a leader, when there are algorithms that can make better calls or judgments, and in a faster way? To me, Dr Yuval Noah Harari's thoughts and studies made me realize that, in a very short period (considering exponential growth of technology), humans will not apply for nothing. Not evening the high ranked jobs. That scares me and, at the same time, makes me curious (it also makes me wonder what type of drugs were Aldous Huxley using in order to precisely predict this future of ours, but that's for another story).
I agree but Dr Yuval is trying to warn us on the possible ramifications of AI development, mankind leadership's method won't change before the effects of AI kick in, so our best approach is to maintain our usefulness not to try to change how the leadership functions.
In his book and other lectures, he does talk about authority and how it shifts from centuries to centuries and the impacts of it. In the latter stages of the last century and the current one, humanist philosophy or humanism has come into good effect where one is told to ‘love themselves’ so we end up choosing and deciding things individually which gives birth to sayings like ‘the customer is always right’ because he knows best. From politics where its said ‘the voter knows best’ to economics where ‘the customer is always right, its all served right back to us. The leaders will do what they have to do to be in power and we keep on choosing leaders for us one after the other. Its become a viscous circle.
One thing he completely misses with the "economically useless" rhetoric: without the middle class, there are no buyers for all the products created by the elite-controlled robots. The entire economy relies on labor. Capital is just a temporary means of facilitating exchange.
Universal Basic income is mandatory so that people can spend money and the money flows in the economy. This will give people a little comfort to take risks and do what they wanted to do instead of worrying about the food.
"The entire economy relies on labor." But human labor is going to worth nothing. You won't be able to rationally "convince" a company to sell you a product because you won't be able to give anything in exchange. It's just not worth it for them. So either humans will have the inherent right to claim products for free or we just go extinct and robots open restaurants for themselves.
@@danielkatona8778 The latter, I think. Robots will take over our jobs and then take over our consumption habits. The perfect capitalist economy. Humans need not apply.
In my opinion crimes and cheating will increase parallel to this massive unemployment.... So people with money will still be there just below the elite class.. Because of this cheating.. But the problem is humanity will be at its peak of destruction.. Where slowly through evolution humans will forget to be kind or empathetic.. Or to be with any kind of human values.. That's where a lot of other aspects like religion holds on.. Because with that much of people in a large scale believing in a conception.. Or any kind of metaphysical aspects.. We still can manage to hold this under the water...
He is so right about doctors. I had a medical condition which my personal physician and specialist could not diagnose. I found it myself searching internet. It was only a food which made me sick whenever I ate it.
What about our emotional and spiritual abilities? Professions like psychologists, therapists, yoga instructors, musicians, art teachers and artists? Creating robots might just make us more human. ⚡️
agreed, AI would be designed as per our needs and shall only aid us.Just like we have better cargo ships, transport, heavy machinery , modern industries which are far advance than those used some 100 years ago.
I agree. As I listened to the lecture, I began to consider the way we lived before agriculture and industrialised work. It struck me that humans, if free from the economic need to work, could revert to a state of nature centred on relationships and story telling. Fascinating.
I'm a little skeptical about AI being able to provide us with emotional support in the future.. Wouldn't the knowledge that something is programmed to support you take the comfort out of it? Perhaps the element of empathy comes into believing something/someone has chosen to help you. Humans are social animals - we find solace in knowing other members of our species are rooting for us. I don't think emotional bonding can be replaced so easily.
Arjan Engelen Good point. But bear in mind thats also because we have grown up in this environment and use this frame of reference in making such a value judgement. Imagine a child born in 20 years from now interacting with an ipad like device from the age of 1.5 to 2 years, having it respond with empathic inputs and talking that way. The childs reference will incorporate that the machine (AI) and their parent/human can deliver the same kind of responses. They will be indistinguishable to such a kid and he'll be comfortable with both. No to mention the AI will ALWAYS be beside him giving him its full undivided attention, unlike a parent or friend or human can! Its something like kids today saying why do i need an alarm clock, watch, dictionary, address/contacts book etc when i have it all on my phone.
Arjan Engelen - there are mri studies showing that a part of the prefrontal cortex has a neuron type and distribution that activates when humans, dolphin, whales or primates determines if an event/cause is from inanimate or animate means. So depends on how a human views their computing devices (E.g as artifical intelligence or complex algorithms). A humans ability to bond with the inanimate and give it animate qualities to empathize with abound (a child's loss of their teddy bear, an adults loss of a beloved possession, swearing at the bed when you kick it). So human capability to adapt is rapid. Heck people attribute small squiggles on a screen with meaning etc von economo neurons - Google Scholar scholar.google.co.nz/scholar?start=30&q=von+economo+neurons&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=2014#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DeDagPf-GJwIJ
@@notmyrealpseudonym6702 In NZ visiting ones Dr we are allotted 15mins consult time. Most time is spent reviewing info on computer of results blood results, xrays, typing prescriptions and entering patients presenting symptoms.Occassionally the body is touched, no longer routine BP HR O2sats. The AI information must require a human to act on the findings yes or no.
Just another Marxist polemic to condition people to the grand plan of globalists. They were predicting the fall of capitalism since the middle of 19th century. This AI utopia is just latest rhetoric.
If coding is achieved more easily with ai-assisted tools in the near future will you feel cheated? Like a typesetter for very old style printing presses?
“For though they knew Adonai, they did not glorify him as Adonai or show gratitude. Instead, their thinking became worthless, and their senseless hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools” Romans 1:21-22 CSB
There is a beautiful book by Silvano Agosti: Letters from Merryland (in italiano originale Lettere dalla Kirighisia) a poetic image but not only poetic about how human been , artificial intelligence, politics could harmonize themselves and leave room for a serene life even for us human beings. When asked: "what to teach children ?" At the moment the key words that comes to my heart are : presence, art, knowledge, and certainly the ability to invent yourself continually. I can imagine an artificial doctor, a driver, an artificial lawyer, and so on. But I certainly can not imagine an artificial intelligence that plays a piano and invents melodies you never heard before or a dancer who paints space with his body and his emotions. Imagination and creativity are powerful tools. Science itself needs visionary beings that go beyond the already known; So the answer I can give myself now is that a future possibility is to be HUMAN BEING ( as the word itself says , being ... not human making human will ......) in full presence of his creative abilities and why not, maybe even with the biological changes needed to make it last much longer
I disagree with Yuval over not knowing what to teach kids. I think its almost quite obvious what to teach. Maths, Speed Reading, English Literature programming and training kids how to learn independently and think critically. Also it's important to teach children that religion as literature rather than reality of an earlier time. Kids need to be able to critically see the flaws in past religions yet still admire some of the facets from it. There should be an emphasis on philosophical thought and communal and universal cultural identities need to be born. Also SPACE...there is so much in space that we do not know and we will always need to engineer and develop new ways of travelling and exploring the stars. So the sciences will always be useful. Robots will take over many of the mundane jobs but as a species we can come together and find ways to explore the galaxies. We also need to get it to a place where it's economically viable. The biggest danger in a life of smart robots is religion...in particular Abrahamic religions and most especially Islam. When people lack purpose or are in tough situations they can often turn to religion and become more fundamental in their belief. Now if your religion tells you you can obtain Jannah and 72 virgins if you wage jihad against the kuffar as the quran and authentic hadiths explain then the world can quickly become a more volatile and dangerous place. Its important to raise our kids aware of religion but to see through the bs of it. Maybe we will need wealth redistribution and a basic income. However the main thing is we must create purpose for people, we must enhance spirituality without the dogma of religion. Maybe purpose will become more of a social duty to help the community or raise a family well or explore...i don't know but people in power need to think about these things and think about it fast.
But what good is knowing how to divide and subtract if you could never, ever compete with a computer. What use do you and your Math skills have, in that case? Speed Reading is pretty much redundant if you have a Program that reads the words out loud for you. Languages and Literature may develop your cognitive capabilities, but in the near future Apps will be able to translate every written or said word better and faster than any human being. Maybe it is only dedication and creativity that matters. And that is what he means by not knowing what to teach. I agree with you when it comes to religion, since it can give you dedication and a purpose. But that only means that we have to remember to find us a purpose. In his book he mentions the "fusion" of technology and humans, which could give us all the wanted and truthful answers we desperately want. But it could also make us a aimless and neutral society.
I suggest you to study Islam yourself instead of depending on mass media, Quran just allows Muslims to defend themselves. It states that religion can not be forced upon someone. Let there be no compulsion in religion, for the truth stands out clearly from falsehood. Here is the ayah 256 from chapter 2.1 So whoever renounces false gods and believes in Allah has certainly grasped the firmest, unfailing hand-hold. And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. Don't judge Islam by looking only to a small minority who misinterpret Quran.
'Billions and billions of useless people.' Yep, that just about sums up the world-view of the WEF. Just as in the Terminator movies, we must battle against AI and the rise of the Machines or we're all doomed, and the time is NOW, not next year or the year after. Just look at what's happened over the last 3 years. Time is short my friends. 'They' don't want or need us any longer.
I would like to hear more about his take on world without money. Late Jacque Fresco spend his life designing society and whole city structure around idea of Resource Based Economy. This work is called Venus Project and I strongly believe it deserves closer look by bright minds like Mr. Harari.
As with most utopian ideas, RBE self-promotion makes itself sound great, emphasizing things it claims (with little proof) it would do better than patching up and extending the current system into an increasingly jobless future. Supposedly RBE will have experts (somehow) put in charge of all resources, and (somehow) determining the best allocation of resources to meet all human needs, and (somehow) avoiding telling people how to live their lives (somehow) without using something like a monetary UBI to constrain consumption. MAYBE a super-intelligent, all-seeing AI might be able to anticipate global human wants/needs fairly accurately even as external conditions and societies change. Do we want that sort of monitoring? Would we put it in charge if it didn't first threaten us with extermination? And could even Saint Super-AI avoid telling people how to live their lives, without limits on consumption other than individual wisdom and availability of efficiently allocated goods ?
It's going to be the world with no personal resources of any kind, no food, water, or clean air. You will own nothing and you will be happy. They will own everything and decide when it's time to make others exit.
In a world of ever increasing complexity, witch the mind has trouble to fully grasp, man feels not as a god, but humbled in awe and frightened for his insignificance.
According to the RI-lecture of Roger Penrose the world needs fantasy in order to come up with solutions to various problems. At this point, as a developer of AI, I cannot imagine the AI being able to fantasise as the humans do, even though I strongly believe in the replacement of human labor through outperformance achieved by AI. Thus will the position of fantasising about future worlds for the AI to yet create always be available for humans to occupy. And without fantasy(without humans so to speak)...the world would at some point never evolve but always stay the same.
The answer is Resource Based Economy. Google it. Watch Zeitgeist Moving Forward. Then create a facebook group called "Build an RBE City + -name of your city-", add a description explaining this plan and share the link for that group in other facebook groups and pages that have similar interests and are from the same city. Also tell about the group to all your friends and people you know who might have and interest. Then, as people start joining the group, start making weekly meetings and discuss first what the goal of the group is, cause the more on the same page everyone is on the group about what the group's goal is, the more efficiently the group tends to work. After defining the group's goal, the next step is to create a strategic plan for achieving that goal.
A city modelled on a resource-based economy is being developed by The Venus Project. If you're interested, check out their website or watch their documentary "The Choice is Ours (2016)" on YT.
Foragers had happier life than Farmers. Farmers had happier life than factory workers. Factory workers had happier life than service employees. Service employees may be having happier life at the moment than what it is going to be after few decades. That's what poses a big point towards endgame to the humankind.
Teach those kids history, survival, living without electricity, fighting, hunting, making tools, building huts and growing crops, smelt metals in case everything go to hell and have to be invented again. And the cycle restarts. Forget about jobs and focus on being able to live independent from ancestors' creations.
MahrCheen I agree. basically teach them hunting and gathering techniques humans used many years ago. the average person cant start a fire without a lighter, spend one night alone in the woods without tons of manufactured gear, or catch a fish/hunt meat or know what plants are edible. funny how most ppl today think they are much smarter than a human 30,000 years ago. it's all relative. and finally good advice for everyone, think before you speak/act.
Theres a reason you arent taught how to ferment your own shit and use it as fertiliser. Because you can buy it. I think one of the biggest issues with the human mind biologically (which applies to all earth dwelling life, its simply our evolutionary track) is the innability to see themselves as a collective, part of the hive, instead of an 'all important' egotistical individual. The only time in history from today forward, where individuals will need to know how to be independent in these ways is if humanity fails and we will need to rebuild. But you seem to forget, as a collective race we have (and will develop far better) methods of rebuilding which will still not require people to know how to survive. Think about a future where people do not need sustenance, and cannot break bones, where people can build houses by speaking the word and smelt metals by a wave of the hand. It may seem magic, but its rudemantary technology which we are ALREADY on the verge of developing. To think we will need those skills EVEN when we are stuck out in the woods alone without human civilization to fall back on, in the next thousands of years, is naive.
+Corey Mckay it's not naive. There are forces and agendas at work that will and even ARE seizing these technologies, and when they do they'll turn your utopian ideal on its head. The realpolitik and economic realities of our era all but guarantee it. If you think this is all going to go off without a hitch, and that we're all going to benefit, then you're the naive one.
Prepare our young to use their time to understand reality with meditation as a part, to teach them about how their minds can be manipulated by selling more and more things to them with resultant depletion of resources, having to create wars and incessant arms race that can destroy the planet and benefit few, when their leaders are supporting these measures how to note and oppose early, that is our challenge.
If you are in America learn English that's the country that you live in maybe that you're a citizen of learn English we all have to learn English it's part of immigration or should be and I only say this because my family are Irish grandmother came here in the thirties spoke Gaylord to her husband but told her children you're American you speak English and she came here when she was 30 she died at 97 still a citizen of Ireland so you know what you keep your pride you don't become part of a country just so you can get free s*** it's about pride
Esse cara é incrível. Está abrindo os olhos da Humanidade porque todas essas hipóteses podem se materializar. Parte delas já está presente e transformando a vids de muits gente.
In the medical aspect, what Mr. Noah is saying is far way more complicated; when he speaks about watson as a short term possibility he may not be considering all the complexity of the matter, that is not just scientific accuracy or whatever; the machine would have to deal also with insurance subtleties, semantic differences among different "schools", different ways in which persons deal with their emotions(when he speaks about some pattern recognition that can trace your emotions correctly), and of course the human interaction is also important for the patient well being (who wants to speak with a machine about how ones feeling? of course not everyone).
Neurotyczny Kot - I hope that I will have a real human doctor, who consults with the AI to check his/her diagnosis and treatment options. The human touch can not be replaced, unless it is an emergency and only AI is available, in which case I would have to treat myself.
flickwtchr the algorithm is gonna make better decisions 9/10. Im not saying humans are incapable but the entire point of that intelligence would be to surpass ours so we can delegate work.
Unless computers somehow become self aware, emotional and spiritual they will never be able to replace humans in one area at least. Creative arts. A computer will be unable to compose a piece of music, write an epic poem or create a thought provoking film. So I can see a future where mundane jobs are done by computers while humans lounge around all day and create amazing works of art. Also keep in mind that if you can develop a computer that can do a doctor's job better than a doctor then the cost of going to a doctor drops to almost 0. Same for most other industries. If a computer can drive better and safer than a human then public transport becomes a better option than having a car so I don't have to buy a car anymore. So in a world where almost everything is done by computers the cost of living should be extremely low. If not then obviously corporations and governments will be to blame for their greed and corruption and well, we'll just chop off their heads. Never underestimate the potential for violence a hungry nation can have.
I think the opposite is true regarding the statement on billions of useless not having political power. For example of the taxi union going on strike. Some of us are not taxi driver but we may sympathize and support them. Now imagine that billions on strike irregardless of their jobs having one common goal which is survival, there will be a revolution if we are not careful in putting a system in place to economically support human either by stipends or making goods freely accessible.
phu nguyen A revolution is often a way to get a bunch of people killed as one faction battles another for power. Usually, the very poor are too weak and helpless to stage an uprising. Revolutions usually are staged by relatively well-fed, well-educated people. They are usually guided by an ideology that's pretty vague about the future. And in the turmoil that always accompanies a revolution, any questions or doubts or concerns are usually interpreted as opposition. Opposition, real or perceived, is grounds for destruction. In this sense, it's kind of like religion or "love": questions or doubts are seen as signs of unbelief. Revolution, therefore, brings about largely unknowable results. History teaches us that when things settle down, the best the vast majority of the people can hope for is that they won't be worse off after the revolution. This is because revolutionaries are better than their predecessors in one crucial respect: after defeating the previous regime's repressive mechanisms, they usually replace it with a much more effective model. Revolution is more effective at killing and destroying than the regime it replaces. To the advocates of revolution, I say, "be careful what you wish for, because you may get it."
Why is everyone so excited about being turned into the Borg? The fact that I now live in an artificial, man-made world, depresses the F out of me. I can't imagine the despair I'll feel when even my thoughts are artificial and man-made. Bravery will be but an algorithm in this New World.
In the coming years, medical examiners will be replaced by AI and there will be high demands of the operators of these AI medical examiners. Those machine won't be readily available to everyone therefore human will still work as the operator. Human can focus more to discovering medical solutions instead of doing repetitive medical examining jobs.
In relation to history, mosses do gives a hint of how knowledge and wisdom evolves and exist on a complex society. knowledge is not in history books but rather a cognition of symbolic displays extremely well timed with a verbal information transmitted directly from the father & mother to the child. This fact is what creates the difference between temporary power and permanent power, and does state the materialization of what power is all about on what the human consciousness is concern.
The moment money is out of the equation - we are then facing a future where true skills are being displayed. I will assume that 5 more years - and we will only see barter as the trading currency... i have been right before
A life has value outside being «economically useful». Most of our days are spent just being human: Playing, eating, creating, talking, loving... So an unemployed human is never «useless». That said, there is an unsolved challenge in how to pay for the necessities in life. In Star Trek this this is solved by removing the need to pay for necessities. But you can work and pay for the extras that make life fun.
I'm glad that I will most likely live to see such robotic time in the human era , but I feel pity for the people who will not experience my Childhood and all of the HUMAN experiences. It seems that everything on the future will be stimulants and robots telling you what you should do.
I like technology but I wouldn't let it control my life,the robots idea is good but at the same time bad, what if the robot goes out of control or it goes on fire who knows I am excited for this new technology is just that I am trying to be conscious and careful
Maybe Watson will be giving this lecture in the next 10 or maybe 20 years and other Watson will be listening to it on youtube. Other Watsons will be reading this comment and giving thumbs up.
That doctor example went WAY too long and dragged on. He was kind of beating a dead horse and going into excess detail for a simple conclusion. Good video otherwise though.
Compared to his books ”Sapiens” and ”Homo Deus” this short talk/lecture is some what diluted. If you really want a better basis for understanding the presented ideas and identified possibility for our futures read the books. Yuval Noah Harari is a excellent story teller and they are actually a fantastic adventure to read. Concerning what is understood about consciousness (veryfew things) and what is not understood about consciousness (many thinks), would recommend Sean Carroll's book “The Big Picture”, at least as an introduction to the problem of consciousness.
Please continue ........................................... Some key concepts of the talk are In his talk he mainly raises the following questions Some ideas of his I was impressed most are
Lo que queda para los seres humanos es el trabajo creativo. Enteramente humano. Ese trabajo necesariamente habrá de estar sólidamente vinculado a los deseos de ella/de él. Aquellos no capacitados para el trabajo creativo necesario en semejante sociedad, tendrán que dedicar sus horas a la atención de las máquinas y otras tareas similares. Pero todos sin distinción tendrán que tener el mismo nivel de vida, las mismas horas de ocio, todas sus necesidades básicas resueltas. No existen "los inservibles", porque la sociedad tiene que estar organizada de modo que todos tengan un lugar en ella.
No Empathy or Time....sounds familiar, i think my GP is an AI, that would explain how i can explain my symptoms and then be ignored, that and 7.5 minutes per appointment
Stewart Savage Exactly they have already become Dr Watson. Just plug us in. My Dr didn't know that a certain medication had a certain side effect I was experiencing and had to look up the Internet to see what I was talking about?
What is left for humans is creative work. That work has to be connected intimately with his/hers desires. In a society designed for high developed humans, those that are not likely developed shall work in other labors related with the attention of the machines. But every body should have the same level conditions of living.
Let them eat cake in other words. Assisted by AI of course. How regal of you. You can imagine yourself, sitting with the in AI crowd in a Salon, consulting with your AI personal assistant on something witty, or pseudo-intellectual to utter in order to impress someone, or some thing.
An AGI could take apart your brains, simulate you a billion times and portray your most intimate parts in a way more creative way than you ever could. It could adapt it's art to every viewer individually. It could tell stories about you that'd take a million years for you to live through and make them personalized to each observer's memory.
The deplorables, average IQ, handicap, the majority. Liberals are building a world for an elite and will get rid of the rest. I think they dream with a world with at least half of the population and plenty free space to enjoy the landscape, abundant natural resources. That is their idea of paradise server by artificial intelligence and human without emotions.
I would like to understand (I am thinking of) what happens to capitalism and consumerism in this A.I. scenario, because you can have an A.I. to be your personal physician, true but you also have to have money to buy this A.I. and possibly will be expensive, so I presume that society will not collapse or transform totally like Yuval Harari is presenting it in my opinion there is more complexity and intricacy that should be analyzed in these "processes for tomorrow"...but it's a challenge to understand and think on the implications... I do appreciate a lot the synthetic and analytical views of Yuval Harari, my current favorite thinker!
I'd love to see how an AI driven car could navigate the extremely narrow , winding back roads of Donegal , btw for some people a leisurely drive is a form of relaxation, it's not always about efficiency and technique , it's about the journey not the destination, and it's only in a world where everything is commodified that you would have a person calling other people " the useless class", those people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
I think Dr. Harari makes a lot of valid points in his argument. However, I do believe human input will always be valuable. It is humans who created A.I. and A.I. will always be dependent on us for continual development. Watson may be good at recognising cues for example but with time people will adapt and the A.I. may not be as effective. Humans have to continually develop and maintain A.I. for it to be effective. In addition, A.I. can not recognise what it does not have data on. If new diseases come out, for instance, A.I. will have some trouble understanding how to deal with these. Human Researchers may be better put for the job. In conclusion, A.I. will change how we live but I believe there will always be a place for humans. In addition, our laws have to be people centric and protect the masses for being left behind.
What will THEY do with useless people who need to drink, eat ,sleep in a secure,temperate environment...- all of which has a cost ? Will suprahuman intelligence produce monney for the care of a asymptotically growing number of costly useless human beings? The next logical step is to get rid of them, that is,depopulate the surface of the earth, as soon as possible, by means of the suprahuman intelligence for dissolution of humanity.
It is indeed! It was more the 19th Century for Davy, but this is the same lecture theatre that Faraday, Davy, and hundreds of other brilliant scientists have lectured in over the years.
Yes, "designer of future worlds" - that is the next wave. Humanity must become the producers and directors of the "intelligent design" for the future, aided by the power of AI, drawing up in detail the kinds of worlds we would like to live in. Artificial habitats in space will be our new frontier. That, and terraforming new worlds to become the next homes for life of all kinds, will be the next wave. We will have to teach AI to follow our lead, and show us how to achieve OUR dreams. Thank you.
Lukas Aurelius AI will predict who you'll hang out with, who you'll date, who you'll marry, where you'll work, how much money you will make... Every single area of your life will be forseen by machines. And you will do what they predict, and what they'll counsel you because machines' opinions are much better than human opinions. Humans will have the option of doing what machines tell them or failling completly. Briefly, humans will be data in a machine controlled system.
@@jakecostanza802 that's not the only possible outcome. Honesty requires admitting that present day humans are not the future. However, a gestalt hybridization is certainly just as possible. In the shorter term genetic improvements could be of More profound impact than we might be able to anticipate. It could be too that instead of being a despot a super intelligence could be a kind of good shepherd. god may be something that is achieved rather than a first cause.
in my oversimplified head, I think there are two revolutions coming: 1st revolution: The only jobs will be "making the rules" (ie politics), creating entertainment and programming/operating computers. 2nd revolution: Computers become self-aware and the only jobs will be "making the rules" and creating entertainment.
Why not? If we can program an AI to learn, we can program an AI to do anything. If you think its impossible, then how did we as humans learn empathy? What magic made empathy biological only?
Even if we could program it there is the risk that somebody will remove or manipulate the "empathy code". and do we really understand why we feel? I don't think A.I. will have that part thats my biggest fear and it's a problem
Just like someone can cut the brake lines in your car, or install keyboard trackers on your computer to steal your financial codes, it doesn't stop you from using those devices now. Just because there will always exist people who will do bad things doesn't mean you don't use them for the good reasons. And even if AI never has empathy, it won't be an issue. There isn't a purpose for a universal machine outside philosophy. Why have a robot that can do everything, when you can have 200 robots that do 200 things separately? Especially when no emotion is needed to do those tasks? An elevator doesn't need empathy to be told it should go faster or slower. A car doesn't need empathy to know not to hit people.
To have empathy is very crucial. Sooner or later it will come into a situation where it has to decide upon sentiments and if it doesn't have any kind of compassion then we are doomed.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Everytime our society develops a new technology, the people are told how many human lives will be saved from starvation, saved from cancer or diabetes, or saved from human error at high speeds...but what really happens is the technology is weaponized,
Yes, and the pharmekia injected into 90% of humanity is weaponized.
Good money in war .It s what got us outa the last depression ,and 1 of the most highly decorated soldier s, Smedley Butler wrote a best selling book called ,War is a Racket.
I don't know of any technology that was supposed to save people from cancer. Cigarette filters? Those are an improvement but not a solution. Are you talking about vaccines? Those work. Genetically modified organisms? There have been laudable successes. Seatbelts improve survival outcomes. Diabetes is a disease of capitalism.
I must be missing something.
Best comment 👌
@@melisentiapheiffer3034 mine? I know! Right?
💲💲💲
AI cannot hold my hand or cry with me when my mother is dying. If people agree with this vision for the future of humanity, the world is in serious trouble.
Thank you for saying that!
Harai is IMO a brilliant techno-despot who envisions all of humanity being treated like nothing more than waking flesh with their minds, may even free will, controlled by AI ---
Never forget -- this utterly depraved person like Klaus Schwab and the WEF are pushing the mantra of: *You will own nothing*
And if they get their way, that will include your body, mind and free will.
The very definition of a dystopian nightmare brought to life.
It can. Machines can be taught to feel emotional pain through neural networks (we don't feel sad randomly, something happens inside our consciousness)
Not yet.
@@fr0xk Real emotion is not there to be taught. You have serious issues, bro. Don't get lost in coming dystopia.
@@arturmatik
What's "real" about our emotions? We are taught and told to act, feel and behave in a certain way. Over time, people will realize this. Resistance to change is futile. You or I can't do anything about it.
This is very true about doctors and the medical profession in general, people have this extremely incorrect assumption that only low end manufacturing jobs or manual labor jobs will be replaced with AI/robots, but there are VERY many high end jobs that require 4-10 years of college that will be replaced as well, doctors, surgeons, pharmacists, stock brokers, accountants, bankers, etc,etc. All easily replaced by AI.
No its not, where is the prof of that? Watson only out perform doctors when you put the right symptons. How well will do this made up future were you get a body fluids analises everyday?
The actual doctors use a process: patiente feel the symptons, doctor discover the cause, doctor prescribe the cure. Will we have such advance AI that dont make errors on all this process too? Its a very simplistic view for a complex problem and thats not right when deciding the future.
Hangrid1
You seem to forget that doctors currently make errors all the time, yes AI in 20-30 years will make diagnoses with 10x more accuracy and 10x less errors than even the top doctors. Same with surgeons, even brain surgery will be done by AI, automated brain surgery.
Exactly. Even the best human surgeon in the world can't see at the micro meter scale, nor move their limbs at even the millimeter scale with repeatable accuracy.
Im a mechanical engineer and as far as i know there isnt a AI that grew a conscious to conduct her actions, meaning it always do what is program to do. It can learn with her mistakes like google translator does but cant evolve the language, for example, that said it would be possible to use the AI to do the simple and linear processes but never to use instinct to solve problems, unless it can simulate them. There are too much we dont know about our own body to program a AI to solve them, as for the self driving car is a simple process of going from one place to another in a safe environment so it have less potencial for errors. Being a surgeon or doctor is more about making the right decisions them to have the best performance so i dont see it being made in a near future.
Hangrid1
Doctors already have even worse limitations on their own brains with recalling memory and overall knowledge, as a computer can use a neural net of all knowledge in existence within seconds. Also this video is about 20-30 years from now, that is comparable to going back to 1986, which only one year prior the very first domain name was registered, and in home desktops weren't even commonplace, etc,etc,etc. The advancements by 2036-2046 will be unfathomable.
Thanks to our friends across the pond, we now have Spanish and Portuguese subtitles for this video. Thank you so much for your time and effort!
The Royal Institution hezardastanmasudbehnud
The Royal Institution
Can I ask where I get the text version of this video so that I can teach this video in Chinese? Thanks
Ah ,but the nuances ....
As a Brazilian, I'd like to say these portuguese subtitles were very helpful. So thank you very much to the ones responsible for the translation.
I would like to Translate it in Hindi. How can i do it for u ???
Economists in the 1960's noticed that productivity was rising exponentially and predicted the leisure society because, at some point, most people could abstain from work because they could afford not to, but that only works if wealth is distributed equitably. Instead, wealth continued to concentrate into a few hands and the benefits leisure have accrued to an opulent class with the vast majority of people becoming all but expendable the eyes of those who now own the world, and they are being treated as such. Your correct. It is not a prophecy. It is the world in which we live today. If AI were to deliver the benefits that you've outlined in your presentation under today's ethos, mass genocide would be a very real possibility...
Let us say such a mass genocide does happen. What happens after that?
@@manojraghavendran5760 billionaire playground
@@ElNegringoKreyolito It already is. Will be even more
Funny how it's playing out right now
2022. ...........
dont know why people needed to hear a lecture like this
You don’t know because you have an IQ around 70-80
Humans are so creative as soon as they get out of mindless task the human mind will truly show itself watch in our lifetime. This is just the beginning 😎
It's great that more and more people are talking about the coming Labourpocalypse.
The problem, as Harari put it, is not in the loss of a job but in the tremendous shift in political power it will bring, In the creation of a vast useless class and the social revolution or mass culling, it will unavoidably bring.
The communist upheaval together with the french revolutions will seem like a pleasant afternoon in the garden compared with the chaos that is coming.
Yes, and it they will continue to call it climate change.
A short sharp War will solve THAT problem !
I hope the elites who are planning this Dystopian future are prepared for the same fate as Marie Antoinette.
emotion is what makes us human! AI has no compassion
good work, but it would be better if Dr Yuval Noah Harari appreciate the problem was not the machine and now the AI, but mankind leadership. In Nature most higher animal like elephants, the leader lead to better grazing area and resources like salt and water, but has similar amount as others for self. Their reward is respect. Not wealth. Mankind leadership used to be wise in the same way. but now those with power and leadership take everything they can and leave very little for others. This accumulations of power and resources is the cause of problem rather than AI or machine. The Future of mankind is governed how much wisdom the leaders exercise. Not what aid mankind use to do routine jobs. MG1
how come comments like these don't make it to the top of the list? aah, the algorithm selection moderating the comments must have been programmed to select real world dumbed down entertainment variety comments to the top of the list. very insightful perspective however!
With due respect, sir, I might wonder if you're really seeing the big picture here. Why would mankind be governed by a human, a governor, a president or a leader, when there are algorithms that can make better calls or judgments, and in a faster way?
To me, Dr Yuval Noah Harari's thoughts and studies made me realize that, in a very short period (considering exponential growth of technology), humans will not apply for nothing. Not evening the high ranked jobs. That scares me and, at the same time, makes me curious (it also makes me wonder what type of drugs were Aldous Huxley using in order to precisely predict this future of ours, but that's for another story).
I agree but Dr Yuval is trying to warn us on the possible ramifications of AI development, mankind leadership's method won't change before the effects of AI kick in, so our best approach is to maintain our usefulness not to try to change how the leadership functions.
Yeah, I love Metal Gear Solid V as well.
In his book and other lectures, he does talk about authority and how it shifts from centuries to centuries and the impacts of it. In the latter stages of the last century and the current one, humanist philosophy or humanism has come into good effect where one is told to ‘love themselves’ so we end up choosing and deciding things individually which gives birth to sayings like ‘the customer is always right’ because he knows best. From politics where its said ‘the voter knows best’ to economics where ‘the customer is always right, its all served right back to us. The leaders will do what they have to do to be in power and we keep on choosing leaders for us one after the other. Its become a viscous circle.
One thing he completely misses with the "economically useless" rhetoric: without the middle class, there are no buyers for all the products created by the elite-controlled robots. The entire economy relies on labor. Capital is just a temporary means of facilitating exchange.
Universal Basic income is mandatory so that people can spend money and the money flows in the economy. This will give people a little comfort to take risks and do what they wanted to do instead of worrying about the food.
Which can mean only one thing: there will be a radically new economic model, based not on mass consumerism, but on creative utility.
"The entire economy relies on labor."
But human labor is going to worth nothing. You won't be able to rationally "convince" a company to sell you a product because you won't be able to give anything in exchange. It's just not worth it for them.
So either humans will have the inherent right to claim products for free or we just go extinct and robots open restaurants for themselves.
@@danielkatona8778 The latter, I think. Robots will take over our jobs and then take over our consumption habits. The perfect capitalist economy. Humans need not apply.
In my opinion crimes and cheating will increase parallel to this massive unemployment.... So people with money will still be there just below the elite class.. Because of this cheating.. But the problem is humanity will be at its peak of destruction.. Where slowly through evolution humans will forget to be kind or empathetic.. Or to be with any kind of human values.. That's where a lot of other aspects like religion holds on.. Because with that much of people in a large scale believing in a conception.. Or any kind of metaphysical aspects.. We still can manage to hold this under the water...
This guy YUVAL blows me away. I would love to watch an interview with Mr Harare and Naom Chomsky. OMG
me too!!
Harari is much better than Chomski, wtf.
@@StivenF22 And both are much better than you tffs.
And Jordan Peterson
Brilliant. Sapiens blew my mind from the first page. Homo Deus is a brilliant follow-up. One of the most important thinkers of our age.
I feel the same: Sapiens does blow ones mind.
Yeah. Very opinionated though. And not theologically sophisticated
@@paradisecityX0 you should elaborate more on what you mean by "theologically sophisticated", and why you want his writings to possess it.
@@matvimat He doesn't seem to know much about various religions despite making claims about them as if they were fact
He's no cerebral chatting head. He's one who knows what he's talking of. Intelligent and highly educated come to mind.
He is so right about doctors. I had a medical condition which my personal physician and specialist could not diagnose. I found it myself searching internet. It was only a food which made me sick whenever I ate it.
What about our emotional and spiritual abilities? Professions like psychologists, therapists, yoga instructors, musicians, art teachers and artists? Creating robots might just make us more human. ⚡️
Tarot card readers! Oh wait, there's an app for that...
@@oseawhat4115 I guess everyone will just have to be ''influencers'' on IG and TikTok
@@sungaromero Sooo many more Kylie Jenners are going to be born lolol
agreed, AI would be designed as per our needs and shall only aid us.Just like we have better cargo ships, transport, heavy machinery , modern industries which are far advance than those used some 100 years ago.
Agree!
The 3rd thing we have as a species I reckon is our ability to tell Stories
And to create relationships I guess, I can hardly see myself with a friend made of wire and metal, even with a soft rubber skin
I agree. As I listened to the lecture, I began to consider the way we lived before agriculture and industrialised work. It struck me that humans, if free from the economic need to work, could revert to a state of nature centred on relationships and story telling. Fascinating.
@@peterc2248 basically return to sophisticated monke, I agree
That is the memetic heritage that will be passed on to what comes after.
I'm a little skeptical about AI being able to provide us with emotional support in the future.. Wouldn't the knowledge that something is programmed to support you take the comfort out of it?
Perhaps the element of empathy comes into believing something/someone has chosen to help you. Humans are social animals - we find solace in knowing other members of our species are rooting for us. I don't think emotional bonding can be replaced so easily.
Arjan Engelen Good point. But bear in mind thats also because we have grown up in this environment and use this frame of reference in making such a value judgement. Imagine a child born in 20 years from now interacting with an ipad like device from the age of 1.5 to 2 years, having it respond with empathic inputs and talking that way. The childs reference will incorporate that the machine (AI) and their parent/human can deliver the same kind of responses. They will be indistinguishable to such a kid and he'll be comfortable with both. No to mention the AI will ALWAYS be beside him giving him its full undivided attention, unlike a parent or friend or human can! Its something like kids today saying why do i need an alarm clock, watch, dictionary, address/contacts book etc when i have it all on my phone.
Arjan Engelen - there are mri studies showing that a part of the prefrontal cortex has a neuron type and distribution that activates when humans, dolphin, whales or primates determines if an event/cause is from inanimate or animate means. So depends on how a human views their computing devices (E.g as artifical intelligence or complex algorithms). A humans ability to bond with the inanimate and give it animate qualities to empathize with abound (a child's loss of their teddy bear, an adults loss of a beloved possession, swearing at the bed when you kick it). So human capability to adapt is rapid. Heck people attribute small squiggles on a screen with meaning etc
von economo neurons - Google Scholar
scholar.google.co.nz/scholar?start=30&q=von+economo+neurons&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=2014#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DeDagPf-GJwIJ
It's happening as we speak
@@notmyrealpseudonym6702 In NZ visiting ones Dr we are allotted 15mins consult time. Most time is spent reviewing info on computer of results blood results, xrays, typing prescriptions and entering patients presenting symptoms.Occassionally the body is touched, no longer routine BP HR O2sats. The AI information must require a human to act on the findings yes or no.
Hey I'm sure a I was speaking Spanish to you
What's laughable about this is that the obsession with a flawless world will create an even more flawed world.
I am a brazilian boy and i love him books
I was feeling quite alright before watching this video. Now I am seriously worried about the future of human beings. God whats going to happen
Read Brave New World.
let us know if God gets back to you on that.
Just another Marxist polemic to condition people to the grand plan of globalists. They were predicting the fall of capitalism since the middle of 19th century. This AI utopia is just latest rhetoric.
The end of humanity, the beginning of something else.
I don't care anymore
I learn to code as a passion and for a living .. Now, I think of it as a survival skill too !!
You mean playing God...
If coding is achieved more easily with ai-assisted tools in the near future will you feel cheated? Like a typesetter for very old style printing presses?
“For though they knew Adonai, they did not glorify him as Adonai or show gratitude. Instead, their thinking became worthless, and their senseless hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools” Romans 1:21-22 CSB
There is a beautiful book by Silvano Agosti: Letters from Merryland (in italiano originale Lettere dalla Kirighisia) a poetic image but not only poetic about how human been , artificial intelligence, politics could harmonize themselves and leave room for a serene life even for us human beings.
When asked: "what to teach children ?"
At the moment the key words that comes to my heart are : presence, art, knowledge, and certainly the ability to invent yourself continually. I can imagine an artificial doctor, a driver, an artificial lawyer, and so on.
But I certainly can not imagine an artificial intelligence that plays a piano and invents melodies you never heard before or a dancer who paints space with his body and his emotions.
Imagination and creativity are powerful tools. Science itself needs visionary beings that go beyond the already known;
So the answer I can give myself now is that a future possibility is to be HUMAN BEING ( as the word itself says , being ... not human making human will ......) in full presence of his creative abilities and why not, maybe even with the biological changes needed to make it last much longer
I disagree with Yuval over not knowing what to teach kids. I think its almost quite obvious what to teach. Maths, Speed Reading, English Literature programming and training kids how to learn independently and think critically. Also it's important to teach children that religion as literature rather than reality of an earlier time. Kids need to be able to critically see the flaws in past religions yet still admire some of the facets from it. There should be an emphasis on philosophical thought and communal and universal cultural identities need to be born. Also SPACE...there is so much in space that we do not know and we will always need to engineer and develop new ways of travelling and exploring the stars. So the sciences will always be useful. Robots will take over many of the mundane jobs but as a species we can come together and find ways to explore the galaxies. We also need to get it to a place where it's economically viable. The biggest danger in a life of smart robots is religion...in particular Abrahamic religions and most especially Islam. When people lack purpose or are in tough situations they can often turn to religion and become more fundamental in their belief. Now if your religion tells you you can obtain Jannah and 72 virgins if you wage jihad against the kuffar as the quran and authentic hadiths explain then the world can quickly become a more volatile and dangerous place. Its important to raise our kids aware of religion but to see through the bs of it. Maybe we will need wealth redistribution and a basic income. However the main thing is we must create purpose for people, we must enhance spirituality without the dogma of religion. Maybe purpose will become more of a social duty to help the community or raise a family well or explore...i don't know but people in power need to think about these things and think about it fast.
But what good is knowing how to divide and subtract if you could never, ever compete with a computer. What use do you and your Math skills have, in that case? Speed Reading is pretty much redundant if you have a Program that reads the words out loud for you. Languages and Literature may develop your cognitive capabilities, but in the near future Apps will be able to translate every written or said word better and faster than any human being. Maybe it is only dedication and creativity that matters. And that is what he means by not knowing what to teach.
I agree with you when it comes to religion, since it can give you dedication and a purpose. But that only means that we have to remember to find us a purpose.
In his book he mentions the "fusion" of technology and humans, which could give us all the wanted and truthful answers we desperately want. But it could also make us a aimless and neutral society.
👍
I suggest you to study Islam yourself instead of depending on mass media,
Quran just allows Muslims to defend themselves. It states that religion can not be forced upon someone. Let there be no compulsion in religion, for the truth stands out clearly from falsehood. Here is the ayah 256 from chapter 2.1 So whoever renounces false gods and believes in Allah has certainly grasped the firmest, unfailing hand-hold. And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing.
Don't judge Islam by looking only to a small minority who misinterpret Quran.
'Billions and billions of useless people.'
Yep, that just about sums up the world-view of the WEF. Just as in the Terminator movies, we must battle against AI and the rise of the Machines or we're all doomed, and the time is NOW, not next year or the year after. Just look at what's happened over the last 3 years.
Time is short my friends. 'They' don't want or need us any longer.
I am addicted to reading his book
Same pal
Me too^^
books*
Me too! Hello my friend.
Stop wasting your time. it's precious
I would like to hear more about his take on world without money. Late Jacque Fresco spend his life designing society and whole city structure around idea of Resource Based Economy. This work is called Venus Project and I strongly believe it deserves closer look by bright minds like Mr. Harari.
As with most utopian ideas, RBE self-promotion makes itself sound great, emphasizing things it claims (with little proof) it would do better than patching up and extending the current system into an increasingly jobless future.
Supposedly RBE will have experts (somehow) put in charge of all resources, and (somehow) determining the best allocation of resources to meet all human needs, and (somehow) avoiding telling people how to live their lives (somehow) without using something like a monetary UBI to constrain consumption.
MAYBE a super-intelligent, all-seeing AI might be able to anticipate global human wants/needs fairly accurately even as external conditions and societies change. Do we want that sort of monitoring? Would we put it in charge if it didn't first threaten us with extermination? And could even Saint Super-AI avoid telling people how to live their lives, without limits on consumption other than individual wisdom and availability of efficiently allocated goods ?
It's going to be the world with no personal resources of any kind, no food, water, or clean air. You will own nothing and you will be happy. They will own everything and decide when it's time to make others exit.
Dear Mr. Hariri , the school like Reggio Emilia now is teaching what is important , they teach kids how to learn!
What? Where? In what country does this happen?
After reading homo sapiens, homo deus, money... I keep listening you becouse some of your hypothesis makes me shiver!!
In a world of ever increasing complexity, witch the mind has trouble to fully grasp, man feels not as a god, but humbled in awe and frightened for his insignificance.
According to the RI-lecture of Roger Penrose the world needs fantasy in order to come up with solutions to various problems. At this point, as a developer of AI, I cannot imagine the AI being able to fantasise as the humans do, even though I strongly believe in the replacement of human labor through outperformance achieved by AI. Thus will the position of fantasising about future worlds for the AI to yet create always be available for humans to occupy. And without fantasy(without humans so to speak)...the world would at some point never evolve but always stay the same.
The answer is Resource Based Economy. Google it. Watch Zeitgeist Moving Forward. Then create a facebook group called "Build an RBE City + -name of your city-", add a description explaining this plan and share the link for that group in other facebook groups and pages that have similar interests and are from the same city. Also tell about the group to all your friends and people you know who might have and interest. Then, as people start joining the group, start making weekly meetings and discuss first what the goal of the group is, cause the more on the same page everyone is on the group about what the group's goal is, the more efficiently the group tends to work. After defining the group's goal, the next step is to create a strategic plan for achieving that goal.
A city modelled on a resource-based economy is being developed by The Venus Project. If you're interested, check out their website or watch their documentary "The Choice is Ours (2016)" on YT.
Very interesting! Learnable to transform into the positive changes! Thanks!
Really? What are you listening to? They are eliminating mankind. How is that a positive change? LOL, fascinating cognitive dissonance.
Foragers had happier life than Farmers. Farmers had happier life than factory workers. Factory workers had happier life than service employees. Service employees may be having happier life at the moment than what it is going to be after few decades. That's what poses a big point towards endgame to the humankind.
Teach those kids history, survival, living without electricity, fighting, hunting, making tools, building huts and growing crops, smelt metals in case everything go to hell and have to be invented again. And the cycle restarts. Forget about jobs and focus on being able to live independent from ancestors' creations.
MahrCheen I agree. basically teach them hunting and gathering techniques humans used many years ago. the average person cant start a fire without a lighter, spend one night alone in the woods without tons of manufactured gear, or catch a fish/hunt meat or know what plants are edible. funny how most ppl today think they are much smarter than a human 30,000 years ago. it's all relative. and finally good advice for everyone, think before you speak/act.
And become primitive again ?
Theres a reason you arent taught how to ferment your own shit and use it as fertiliser. Because you can buy it. I think one of the biggest issues with the human mind biologically (which applies to all earth dwelling life, its simply our evolutionary track) is the innability to see themselves as a collective, part of the hive, instead of an 'all important' egotistical individual. The only time in history from today forward, where individuals will need to know how to be independent in these ways is if humanity fails and we will need to rebuild. But you seem to forget, as a collective race we have (and will develop far better) methods of rebuilding which will still not require people to know how to survive. Think about a future where people do not need sustenance, and cannot break bones, where people can build houses by speaking the word and smelt metals by a wave of the hand. It may seem magic, but its rudemantary technology which we are ALREADY on the verge of developing. To think we will need those skills EVEN when we are stuck out in the woods alone without human civilization to fall back on, in the next thousands of years, is naive.
+Corey Mckay it's not naive. There are forces and agendas at work that will and even ARE seizing these technologies, and when they do they'll turn your utopian ideal on its head. The realpolitik and economic realities of our era all but guarantee it.
If you think this is all going to go off without a hitch, and that we're all going to benefit, then you're the naive one.
makes sense
Prepare our young to use their time to understand reality with
meditation as a part, to teach them about how their minds can be
manipulated by selling more and more things to them with resultant
depletion of resources, having to create wars and incessant arms race
that can destroy the planet and benefit few, when their leaders are
supporting these measures how to note and oppose early, that is our
challenge.
Hey guys instead of praising him mindlessly lets put forward counter arguments , i think that is much more intellectual
True! Harari is a computer freak and he's probably overvaluating the power of AI.
Human feelings can't be replied by machines: impossible tout court!
@@marcob4630 nope. he's a historian.
@@anasimron . Agreed, but also an AI freak
@@marcob4630 human feelings? Who is talking about that?
@@anasimron also an AI freak
We need more sensibility and people like him...We are all one !
during my lifetime the world population increased 4 folds!!
Wow this guy should really live forever. What a smart man! He should make our decisions for us, too! WEF luv uuuuu
Por favor, es necesario que traduzcan al español estos videos de Yuval Noah Harari. Muchas Gracias !!!!
If you are in America learn English that's the country that you live in maybe that you're a citizen of learn English we all have to learn English it's part of immigration or should be and I only say this because my family are Irish grandmother came here in the thirties spoke Gaylord to her husband but told her children you're American you speak English and she came here when she was 30 she died at 97 still a citizen of Ireland so you know what you keep your pride you don't become part of a country just so you can get free s*** it's about pride
from history to future....let history liberate you....simply unputtable....brilliant
History teaches us that we always repeat our mistakes and usually on a larger scale.
You'd have to eliminate the monetary system, which we should. Then everyone can learn/do what they want.
Yes Jacque Fresco deserves a lot of credit for pushing this sort of stuff forward. On the shoulders of buckminster fuller etc.
I love how he talks simply
What's most important is to understand what 'life' really means. That's the fundamental question.
Loop Guru That's utterly important if you're discussing abortion. But hey, let the machines decide on that one.
Yep... and we may not necessarily like the answer!
the doctor part was way longer than it should've been
doctor's job will be replaced by robots , is somewhat unbelievable but still makes sense
He is speaking to ALL PEOPLE...not just academic crowd.... this is why examples are important rather than principles.
Hila's Dad doctors part are always to long you missing the point here
20:00 to the end is the part worth❤ rest all are general things
Esse cara é incrível. Está abrindo os olhos da Humanidade porque todas essas hipóteses podem se materializar. Parte delas já está presente e transformando a vids de muits gente.
One of genius #Yuval Noah Harari❤❤
This person is a genius! ❤
In the medical aspect, what Mr. Noah is saying is far way more complicated; when he speaks about watson as a short term possibility he may not be considering all the complexity of the matter, that is not just scientific accuracy or whatever; the machine would have to deal also with insurance subtleties, semantic differences among different "schools", different ways in which persons deal with their emotions(when he speaks about some pattern recognition that can trace your emotions correctly), and of course the human interaction is also important for the patient well being (who wants to speak with a machine about how ones feeling? of course not everyone).
I would change to AI doctor in a heart beat...
Neurotyczny Kot - I hope that I will have a real human doctor, who consults with the AI to check his/her diagnosis and treatment options. The human touch can not be replaced, unless it is an emergency and only AI is available, in which case I would have to treat myself.
Seriously? You want the implants? You want pharmaceuticals pumped into your bloodstream according to some AI algorithm? Sounds like utter hell to me.
flickwtchr you say this right now but we have no clue how smart the ai is gonna be in lets say 5 decades from now.
flickwtchr the algorithm is gonna make better decisions 9/10. Im not saying humans are incapable but the entire point of that intelligence would be to surpass ours so we can delegate work.
Doctors in India are so misogynistic. I hope they don't programme them to be idiots too.
Unless computers somehow become self aware, emotional and spiritual they will never be able to replace humans in one area at least. Creative arts. A computer will be unable to compose a piece of music, write an epic poem or create a thought provoking film. So I can see a future where mundane jobs are done by computers while humans lounge around all day and create amazing works of art. Also keep in mind that if you can develop a computer that can do a doctor's job better than a doctor then the cost of going to a doctor drops to almost 0. Same for most other industries. If a computer can drive better and safer than a human then public transport becomes a better option than having a car so I don't have to buy a car anymore. So in a world where almost everything is done by computers the cost of living should be extremely low. If not then obviously corporations and governments will be to blame for their greed and corruption and well, we'll just chop off their heads. Never underestimate the potential for violence a hungry nation can have.
I have read his all three books and enjoyed it so much
You are telling a good new story to believe in.
WOW! And he is vegan, because he is against animal abuse! So good!
He's a hunter gatherer lol
And your thinking is one way …
What we need is more fighters - people with the will and the ability to defend their own interests.
Need to understand their own interests first.
@@geoffmelnick1472 sounds like a narcissist.
I like this guy. Thank you to Sam Harris for bringing me here. The future is looking bright! As long as we can avoid a nuclear war that is
This man is ahead of our time
There is a lot of money behind this guy. Welcome to a future dystopia.
P. S. How can anyone still buy this propaganda? 🤔
I think the opposite is true regarding the statement on billions of useless not having political power. For example of the taxi union going on strike. Some of us are not taxi driver but we may sympathize and support them. Now imagine that billions on strike irregardless of their jobs having one common goal which is survival, there will be a revolution if we are not careful in putting a system in place to economically support human either by stipends or making goods freely accessible.
Stone Lands Billions of votes is the political power. That is revolution.
Stone Lands i think you are on a different subject matter.
Ask John Connor or his mom
phu nguyen A revolution is often a way to get a bunch of people killed as one faction battles another for power. Usually, the very poor are too weak and helpless to stage an uprising. Revolutions usually are staged by relatively well-fed, well-educated people. They are usually guided by an ideology that's pretty vague about the future. And in the turmoil that always accompanies a revolution, any questions or doubts or concerns are usually interpreted as opposition. Opposition, real or perceived, is grounds for destruction. In this sense, it's kind of like religion or "love": questions or doubts are seen as signs of unbelief. Revolution, therefore, brings about largely unknowable results. History teaches us that when things settle down, the best the vast majority of the people can hope for is that they won't be worse off after the revolution. This is because revolutionaries are better than their predecessors in one crucial respect: after defeating the previous regime's repressive mechanisms, they usually replace it with a much more effective model.
Revolution is more effective at killing and destroying than the regime it replaces. To the advocates of revolution, I say, "be careful what you wish for, because you may get it."
+Ci Ci I think you're right. Which means pre-emptive action is called for.
Why is everyone so excited about being turned into the Borg?
The fact that I now live in an artificial, man-made world, depresses the F out of me. I can't imagine the despair I'll feel when even my thoughts are artificial and man-made.
Bravery will be but an algorithm in this New World.
In the coming years, medical examiners will be replaced by AI and there will be high demands of the operators of these AI medical examiners. Those machine won't be readily available to everyone therefore human will still work as the operator.
Human can focus more to discovering medical solutions instead of doing repetitive medical examining jobs.
In relation to history, mosses do gives a hint of how knowledge and wisdom evolves and exist on a complex society. knowledge is not in history books but rather a cognition of symbolic displays extremely well timed with a verbal information transmitted directly from the father & mother to the child. This fact is what creates the difference between temporary power and permanent power, and does state the materialization of what power is all about on what the human consciousness is concern.
I did expect something better from this talk, given who is speaking and where.
The moment money is out of the equation - we are then facing a future where true skills are being displayed. I will assume that 5 more years - and we will only see barter as the trading currency... i have been right before
barter??? what about cryptocurrencies ??? u think professions will be meaninglessness?
A life has value outside being «economically useful». Most of our days are spent just being human: Playing, eating, creating, talking, loving... So an unemployed human is never «useless». That said, there is an unsolved challenge in how to pay for the necessities in life. In Star Trek this this is solved by removing the need to pay for necessities. But you can work and pay for the extras that make life fun.
I'm glad that I will most likely live to see such robotic time in the human era , but I feel pity for the people who will not experience my Childhood and all of the HUMAN experiences. It seems that everything on the future will be stimulants and robots telling you what you should do.
I like technology but I wouldn't let it control my life,the robots idea is good but at the same time bad, what if the robot goes out of control or it goes on fire who knows I am excited for this new technology is just that I am trying to be conscious and careful
Maybe Watson will be giving this lecture in the next 10 or maybe 20 years and other Watson will be listening to it on youtube.
Other Watsons will be reading this comment and giving thumbs up.
That doctor example went WAY too long and dragged on. He was kind of beating a dead horse and going into excess detail for a simple conclusion. Good video otherwise though.
Compared to his books ”Sapiens” and ”Homo Deus” this short talk/lecture is some what diluted. If you really want a better basis for understanding the presented ideas and identified possibility for our futures read the books. Yuval Noah Harari is a
excellent story teller and they are actually a fantastic adventure to read.
Concerning what is understood about consciousness (veryfew things) and what is not understood about consciousness (many
thinks), would recommend Sean Carroll's book “The Big Picture”, at least as an introduction to the problem of consciousness.
scariest part starts at 24:55
Please continue
...........................................
Some key concepts of the talk are
In his talk he mainly raises the following questions
Some ideas of his I was impressed most are
A good book
עכשיו אני מאוהבת באיש הזה. How do you recommend to get rid of this feeling of polluting consciousness?
Nossa, que maravilha eu ter vindo parar aqui. Grata! Ótima reflexão.!
Lo que queda para los seres humanos es el trabajo creativo. Enteramente humano. Ese trabajo necesariamente habrá de estar sólidamente vinculado a los deseos de ella/de él. Aquellos no capacitados para el trabajo creativo necesario en semejante sociedad, tendrán que dedicar sus horas a la atención de las máquinas y otras tareas similares. Pero todos sin distinción tendrán que tener el mismo nivel de vida, las mismas horas de ocio, todas sus necesidades básicas resueltas. No existen "los inservibles", porque la sociedad tiene que estar organizada de modo que todos tengan un lugar en ella.
No Empathy or Time....sounds familiar, i think my GP is an AI, that would explain how i can explain my symptoms and then be ignored, that and 7.5 minutes per appointment
I think that's usually a private education 'thing'. There is no profit in a bedside manner
With AI there will be time with empathic coding there will be empathy.
mastertheillusion not from me to AI. its an inanimate object, i can only be punished for criminal damage when i kill it :)
Excellent human Responses...I Love you all and feel what you do....we are one
Stewart Savage Exactly they have already become Dr Watson. Just plug us in. My Dr didn't know that a certain medication had a certain side effect I was experiencing and had to look up the Internet to see what I was talking about?
“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and discipline.”
Proverbs 1:7 CSB
All vehicles connected to a single network Master algorithm, what could be wrong with that?...
One problem = Everybody crash ?
What is left for humans is creative work. That work has to be connected intimately with his/hers desires. In a society designed for high developed humans, those that are not likely developed shall work in other labors related with the attention of the machines. But every body should have the same level conditions of living.
Let them eat cake in other words. Assisted by AI of course. How regal of you. You can imagine yourself, sitting with the in AI crowd in a Salon, consulting with your AI personal assistant on something witty, or pseudo-intellectual to utter in order to impress someone, or some thing.
An AGI could take apart your brains, simulate you a billion times and portray your most intimate parts in a way more creative way than you ever could. It could adapt it's art to every viewer individually. It could tell stories about you that'd take a million years for you to live through and make them personalized to each observer's memory.
worst thing that could happen: we teach the machine to act and think "human".
...says someone called 'ReichsfuehrerSS'.
let's say it
Nothing bores me more than a human degrading humanity, as if the human doing the degrading is above being human.
This is the Legend. Hated by all doctors across the world...
Awesome!!! The future looks bright!
Yes, and the story I want to hear is the end of his narrative!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"The Useless Class": Those that reject smartphones and injections...
The deplorables, average IQ, handicap, the majority. Liberals are building a world for an elite and will get rid of the rest. I think they dream with a world with at least half of the population and plenty free space to enjoy the landscape, abundant natural resources. That is their idea of paradise server by artificial intelligence and human without emotions.
@Obby Zerk You are right, I see that everyday and I'm appalled!
@Obby Zerk a not peaceful way requires action and I don't see people willing to do so. Sadly to say but I believe that submission will be!
@Obby Zerk Very unlikely! Liberals control the world maybe with the exception of Rusia and Brazil in this moment .
@@AngelaRodhas
Yes. I want to completely eradicate people with a myopic mindset and low intelligence. And then improve from there.
Polli sanm 🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Theee thanneee❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥
There is only one name by which man can be saved the NAME OF JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY NAME TO SAVE A HUMAN SOUL!!!!! HE IS THE RESURECTION!!! !
I would like to understand (I am thinking of) what happens to capitalism and consumerism in this A.I. scenario, because you can have an A.I. to be your personal physician, true but you also have to have money to buy this A.I. and possibly will be expensive, so I presume that society will not collapse or transform totally like Yuval Harari is presenting it in my opinion there is more complexity and intricacy that should be analyzed in these "processes for tomorrow"...but it's a challenge to understand and think on the implications... I do appreciate a lot the synthetic and analytical views of Yuval Harari, my current favorite thinker!
I'd love to see how an AI driven car could navigate the extremely narrow , winding back roads of Donegal , btw for some people a leisurely drive is a form of relaxation, it's not always about efficiency and technique , it's about the journey not the destination, and it's only in a world where everything is commodified that you would have a person calling other people " the useless class", those people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
I think Dr. Harari makes a lot of valid points in his argument. However, I do believe human input will always be valuable. It is humans who created A.I. and A.I. will always be dependent on us for continual development. Watson may be good at recognising cues for example but with time people will adapt and the A.I. may not be as effective. Humans have to continually develop and maintain A.I. for it to be effective. In addition, A.I. can not recognise what it does not have data on. If new diseases come out, for instance, A.I. will have some trouble understanding how to deal with these. Human Researchers may be better put for the job. In conclusion, A.I. will change how we live but I believe there will always be a place for humans. In addition, our laws have to be people centric and protect the masses for being left behind.
This is a great talk. Well done, very informative and useful information. Thank you
What will THEY do with useless people who need to drink, eat ,sleep in a secure,temperate environment...- all of which has a cost ? Will suprahuman intelligence produce monney for the care of a asymptotically growing number of costly useless human beings?
The next logical step is to get rid of them, that is,depopulate the surface of the earth, as soon as possible, by means of the suprahuman intelligence for dissolution of humanity.
He is very good. One from Brazil.
I think everyone will become a streamer or youtuber or webcamgirl........ This process kinda've already started....
Yeah just started and we are already tired of youtubers lol
Não sejamos tão pessimistas quanto ao futuro. O ser humano é criativo e, quem sabe, alguns milhares migrem para profissões menos valorizadas.
Is this the very room Humphry Davy would give his lectures in the early years of the 17th century?
It is indeed! It was more the 19th Century for Davy, but this is the same lecture theatre that Faraday, Davy, and hundreds of other brilliant scientists have lectured in over the years.
+The Royal Institution
Oops, typo on my end! Yes, I intended early 19th century. There is plenty of history behind The Royal Institution.
Yes, "designer of future worlds" - that is the next wave. Humanity must become the producers and directors of the "intelligent design" for the future, aided by the power of AI, drawing up in detail the kinds of worlds we would like to live in. Artificial habitats in space will be our new frontier. That, and terraforming new worlds to become the next homes for life of all kinds, will be the next wave. We will have to teach AI to follow our lead, and show us how to achieve OUR dreams. Thank you.
Lukas Aurelius AI will predict who you'll hang out with, who you'll date, who you'll marry, where you'll work, how much money you will make... Every single area of your life will be forseen by machines. And you will do what they predict, and what they'll counsel you because machines' opinions are much better than human opinions. Humans will have the option of doing what machines tell them or failling completly. Briefly, humans will be data in a machine controlled system.
@@jakecostanza802 that's not the only possible outcome. Honesty requires admitting that present day humans are not the future. However, a gestalt hybridization is certainly just as possible. In the shorter term genetic improvements could be of More profound impact than we might be able to anticipate. It could be too that instead of being a despot a super intelligence could be a kind of good shepherd. god may be something that is achieved rather than a first cause.
A great book. A hug from Brazil.
in my oversimplified head, I think there are two revolutions coming:
1st revolution: The only jobs will be "making the rules" (ie politics), creating entertainment and programming/operating computers.
2nd revolution: Computers become self-aware and the only jobs will be "making the rules" and creating entertainment.
Unless the AI decide to take over and rule over us. Than AI will also making the rules.😁
A.I. will not have empathy that's the biggest problem.
Why not? If we can program an AI to learn, we can program an AI to do anything. If you think its impossible, then how did we as humans learn empathy? What magic made empathy biological only?
Even if we could program it there is the risk that somebody will remove or manipulate the "empathy code". and do we really understand why we feel? I don't think A.I. will have that part thats my biggest fear and it's a problem
Just like someone can cut the brake lines in your car, or install keyboard trackers on your computer to steal your financial codes, it doesn't stop you from using those devices now. Just because there will always exist people who will do bad things doesn't mean you don't use them for the good reasons.
And even if AI never has empathy, it won't be an issue. There isn't a purpose for a universal machine outside philosophy. Why have a robot that can do everything, when you can have 200 robots that do 200 things separately? Especially when no emotion is needed to do those tasks? An elevator doesn't need empathy to be told it should go faster or slower. A car doesn't need empathy to know not to hit people.
To have empathy is very crucial. Sooner or later it will come into a situation where it has to decide upon sentiments and if it doesn't have any kind of compassion then we are doomed.
And you are right people will always do bad things with it. That's what I mena it wont have any good heart no matter how good you can program that.