I am 64 and use GEN AI to analysis this video and get 7 key points, then drop sharing this video to whom maybe concert. this is future and changing youtuber innovation themselves.
Senior developers in AI companies are quitting their jobs because they believe we have already gone to far. Yet you disregard them with flippancy. I find this scary because at no point did you even consider contingency plans if AI ever gets off the rails. You don't care that we are using output from AI that is so frequently wrong it is just unreliable. You don't care about so much that is wrong with AI that it can be the case that you benefit in some way from protecting AI. This lecture was vacuous. Either through incompetence or by deliberately lieing you failed to mention major long term fears or even immediate maluse of a deeply broken technology. My question: When are you going to start being honest and transparent about the current AI platform and the direction it is heading with no constraints?
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you very much for this Knowledge Sharing
I am 64 and use GEN AI to analysis this video and get 7 key points, then drop sharing this video to whom maybe concert.
this is future and changing youtuber innovation themselves.
I don’t have too many life to have a sit and waiting till the final.
and I don’t know if children do like me in the future with a powerful AI
A cat on a stop sign on a truck, oh my!
Very nice one ❤
Well done.
"Each node in the neural network is doing a simple pattern recognition task"
Awesome
Senior developers in AI companies are quitting their jobs because they believe we have already gone to far. Yet you disregard them with flippancy.
I find this scary because at no point did you even consider contingency plans if AI ever gets off the rails.
You don't care that we are using output from AI that is so frequently wrong it is just unreliable. You don't care about so much that is wrong with AI that it can be the case that you benefit in some way from protecting AI.
This lecture was vacuous. Either through incompetence or by deliberately lieing you failed to mention major long term fears or even immediate maluse of a deeply broken technology.
My question: When are you going to start being honest and transparent about the current AI platform and the direction it is heading with no constraints?
I am not using any AI output. Every time I tried it it returned complete nonsense.
Who? Geoffrey Hendon didn’t resign just says he changed his mind.