But if O+W = L; if O = a, W = b and O = x; a+b = x; CH = O+W = a+b too, so, the minimum length is always equal to CH?, in that case, the minimum length is just for make a square?
This might be out of the norm for you, but could you show some field fabrication offsets. Like a 3 piece offset where you use like 1/4 the width and double the offset formula? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
So grateful for this content, thank you sir!
thank you sir! 4th year apprentice sheet metal 473! much appreciated!! much better explanation
But if O+W = L; if O = a, W = b and O = x;
a+b = x; CH = O+W = a+b too, so, the minimum length is always equal to CH?, in that case, the minimum length is just for make a square?
This might be out of the norm for you, but could you show some field fabrication offsets. Like a 3 piece offset where you use like 1/4 the width and double the offset formula? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Sorry ,I'm not familiar with that rule
What's the reason you just don't use the owl method I mean isn't that how you get the offset I mean all set times with divided by length