I remember some pixel fans got mad at me called me Samsung fanboy on a comment under previous video because i said that probably Samsungs zoom video is better but here we are and i was right: 2:232:30 Just turn off vst voice and u will see 😂
It's hilarious to me how much people trash the Samsung cameras in comments, when they objectively perform decently. Same thing happening with animations now, a narrative forms and then suddenly everybody has a problem
Why should they? Even in this video it's clearly seen that it performs sometimes even better than the Pixel... Of course it's no match vs most recent China phones with 3rd gen 1" Sony LYT sensors but still...
@@VelianSpeaksTech that's my point, the criticism is not deserved. The only criticism I have of Samsung is how convoluted the settings are, and how so many features are buried away in difficult to find menus or good lock modules. But if you enjoy tinkering with your tech like me, even this can be a rewarding experience.
@@stevanb.2590 Samsung phones capture a photo when the user takes their finger off the shutter button, instead of when they press it. This is because the phone waits to see if the user will keep the button pressed to record a video. This is an interface choice, not an issue with the camera itself which performs very well, as seen in this video.
@@mooseratt I could not care less if it's camera, interface or alien issue, not being able to capture decent (not great, decent = usable) shot of any moving subject, even in great light is big problem. And it has been like that on Samsung phones forever, one would think they'll do something about it. Competition solved it years ago, so there should be no excuse for unusable pictures of people, kids, pets... anything with even slight movement on 2024. flagship.
I guess there are those who don't watch it with their eyes, but the s24 ultra takes more natural and usable photos. Pixels were also beaten in the video section and stabilization.
This is one of the best camera comparisons I have seen on RUclips, and let me tell you I have seen hundreds. It is nice how you do present the differences and your opinion is spot-on. Looks like you have experience with mirroless cameras to judge those phones. Keep up this excellent work. One thing I would love to see as extra, is some comparison on RAW files.
@@VelianSpeaksTech Thank you. I have searched about Apple ProRAW but haven't find anything on your channel. If you own any Apple iPhone 15 Pro device, it would be great if you include that too, as Apple's RAW implementation seems to be the best in the market. Thank you again.
Something that learned from the in-depth Tech reviews channel is to stop using the portrait mode altogether. Just use the standard lens and then go into edit and apply portrait after the fact. It is fully adjustable and you get a much cleaner initial image
Видеото на Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra пресъздава осезаемо по-добре лицевите черти, цвета на кожата, светлосенките. Това е най-важното при предната камера за самоснимки и видео, а не дали облаците на заден фон ще са една идея по-отчетливи. Да, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL пресъздава облаците малко по-добре при предното видео, защото се вижда част от синьото небе, но дотам. Лицето ти изглежда много по-ясно и естествено при Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. При Google Pixel 9 Pro XL се забелязва крайно неприятно пресилване на бялото и черното, от което страда цялата картина. Има и изкуствено изостряне, което определено вреди на усещането за естествена картина. Колкото до задната камера, на 3:00 си личи колко зле се представя камерата на Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: големи количества шум, поне 2-3 пъти по-силно клатене на картината, кофти студени цветове. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL насича силно на всеки няколко секунди. При S24 Ultra насичането е 5 пъти по-рядко и слабо.
Both these devices have their strengths and weaknesses. To my eye, they trade blows quite evenly in this test. What surprises me is the GULF in the ratings Dxo Mark give these two devices for both photos and videos not being replicated here or anywhere else?.
Yes...DXO mark are a thing of their own I guess :)) Yes, similar in may scenarios though S24U looks has better detail preservation, sometimes worse exposure control in the day but better in night, it's close but when you start to zoom in and nit pick the differences are visible. The 5x and 10x from the pixel and the ultra wide seemed better to me in most scenarios.
@@VelianSpeaksTech i dont like how flashy green the s24u makes leaves and gras and trees sometimes. for me a good cam is when colors are accurate. i dont know why so much people like the "fake" colors of the s24u . and the picture with the blue pants the S24U is extremly noisy . This happends on my s24u anytime i do a indoor shot with not perfect light condition. for me this is the weakness the s24u has. its no hate against s24u its for me just a fact. every phone has pros and cons
That's because the ratings are based on the release versions of the handsets, and there were a LOT of issues with the S24U on release that were fixed with updates.
Front facing video from the pixel does it's best to expose the face, and I like that, much better HDR even if it comes off looking unnatural from what one would expect from your regular front facing video
@@VelianSpeaksTech , напротив! :) Видеото на S24 Ultra пресъздава осезаемо по-добре лицевите черти, цвета на кожата, светлосенките. Това е най-важното при предната камера за самоснимки и видео, а не дали облаците на заден фон ще са една идея по-отчетливи. Да, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL пресъздава облаците малко по-добре при предното видео, защото се вижда част от синьото небе, но дотам. Лицето ти изглежда много по-ясно и естествено при Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. При Google Pixel 9 Pro XL се забелязва крайно неприятно пресилване на бялото и черното, от което страда цялата картина. Има и изкуствено изостряне, което определено вреди на усещането за естествена картина. Колкото до задната камера, на 3:00 си личи колко зле се представя камерата на Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: големи количества шум, поне 2-3 пъти по-силно клатене на картината, кофти цветове.
I think it’s obvious that the details in photos captured by the Pixel are more than those from the S24U. For example, at 8:29, the Pixel captures details of the floor tiles, while the Galaxy just smooths out the noise, making it look like an oil painting. Similarly, at 8:49, I don’t understand why you say the S24U has better detail preservation. From what I see, the S24U just smooths out the roof, making everything look flat and without texture. Even though at 7:20, you said the photos from the Pixel lack details whereas the S24U looks better, I think in that scenario, both photos have a similar level of detail, only with a color difference."
Everytime I observe his video, he always prefers samsung even though its not the case. There was video on comparison of vivo x100 pro vs iphone vs samsung and he constantly was choosing samsung while iphone and vivo were giving photos much better. Atleast he preferred samsung over vivo even though it has one inch sensor. It a no brainer that he is a samsung fanboy
I never owned a Vivo X100 Pro, I had the Vivo X100 Ultra and it easily smokes the S24U in almost every category, especially in the photo domain, that's really no brainer.
Bc when you start to zoom in Pixel photos usually degrade, straight lines aren't straight, excessive sharpness is almost on every shot, and at 700% this is very visible. The only advantages I saw in the Pixel 9 Pro XL are in the 5 and 10x and above plus also better ultra wide and selfie. But for the back main camera this is how I see it. Also a domain where Google was very strong the night photography. Pixel can't control the exposure, blows the highlights, crushes the shadows, I expected that the Pixel will beat the Ultra in night, but I didn't see that happen.
@@VelianSpeaksTechmost of the average users, while reviewing photos in their gallery, don't go above zoom that you get with double tap. So, at least in my case, it's that first look of the photo that's most important.
The video stabilization and camera switching are horrible on the pixel for a $1200 phone in 2024 look at 2:37 .Samsung isn’t at the level of apple in camera switching but putting it next to the pixel shows how far ahead they are ahead of a lot of other phones WOW. 4:35 also
Thanks for the video Once again, on the X5, the speed of the google is at 1/400 and ISO 650, while the Samsung is at 1/50 and ISO 100, so it's impossible to be sharp with such a low speed!! Samsung is limited to being at low ISO instead of managing the speed, so blurry galore
I'm sure that the photo of the pole taken by the 9 Pro XL at 10:05 was more true to life than that of the S24U... Generally speaking I prefer this style of photo and the Pixel I think does it better than the Samsung in the pics in this way. Samsung wins on video by far for its general quality. The Pixel is too mid-range phone for me in other aspects, not to mention the price which completely turns me off.
@@VelianSpeaksTech today it is released in Korea, USA and EU will get update on 9. septembar...i saw some Korean youtubers and they tested cameras...pictures are very cleared and detailed , dynamic range is perfect and colors is so natural!
tengo los 2 moviles insiguia de samsung . S23 ultra y hace poco el s24 ultra , hay una revolucion en el procesado de imagenes para el s24 ultra. natural seria la palabra y ami personalmente me convence ,es agradable a la vista que el detalle en una imagen resulte natural. valoro el detalle de tu video porque muestra la capacidad real de las camaras de estos smarphones en otros canales comparan fotos a simple vista y sacan conclusiones sin profundizar como lo hiciste tu.
For me, the S24 Ultra is a better photophone and simply a better smartphone. The days when Pixels were the best at photography and iPhones at video, have been over for at least 3-4 years, people just refuse to admit it 🤷🏽♂️ The Pixel 9 Pro XL is not bad, it's even very good, but, as I always say and contrary to what people say and think, Pixels (since Pixel 5) do not necessarily have a natural colorimetry, they just have a constant colorimetry and white balance, very often pleasant , but not necessarily natural. And honestly, I don't see myself putting or recommending putting $1200 in a smartphone that, apart from the zoom, is no better than an S23 Plus which currently costs $600 🤷🏽♂️
OK so what's with all the talk I've been seeing online about Samsung having average to below average cameras and Pixels being the king of photography? Honestly, it didn't seem that way to me after watching this vid and in some cases the Samsung just straight up beat the Pixel. Both cameras seem really good but I can't in good conscience say the Pixel dominated or was the "king of photos", not even close.
Videos better on the s24 ultra overall. Photos go to the pixel mostly Edit: i take it back s24 ultra photos and videos.. i tried giving the pixel some points but nah
Should have tested moving subjects, especially indoors. That's where Samsung devices fall apart and Pixels have been pretty good. A lot of people I know switched to Pixel/Iphone due to unusable pictures of their kids. Daylight and nature is an easy task even for midrangers these days.
Samsung phones suffer from a slow shutter lag in auto mode, it can be remediated with pron controls but iPhone and Pixels are far better in these scenarios for sure.
@@VelianSpeaksTechyeah, because of that, the first thing that should be tested when it comes to cameras on Samsung is shutter lag/motion blur. Dxomark, as much as they aren't objective, has that simple test with one person walking towards another in indoor conditions.
I love the pixels software and photography, but the video is still not there yet, its getting better but come on google I want to get another pixel phone and dump my boring iPhone. I have heard that the pixel 9 pro does bad video against sunlight. The voice typing and call screening are such lovely features though, I'm torn.
Like Pixel photos and videos better on most clips until you start to zoom in. But, who zoom in on 12mp photos. If we plan on zooming in, don't we use 50mp
I think pixel procceses too much and compromises detail to make the image look better when u dont zoom in it. Wich just makes it as good as Samsung because Samsung is just the other way around. So its about what u prefer there's no best option on that department.
True. I like how vibrant Sammy is, but I also like how pixel process photos, if you don't nit pick, they are quite good tbh... Wanted to show this in my review...
@VelianSpeaksTech yeah only big difference was in selfies and stabilization was definitely better on Samsung, buy on selfies idk I prefer how the Samsung keeps the skin tones a little warm and not too contrasty on the face shadows while the pixel is the other way around because it's trying to not overexpose the scene around the face like Samsung does and the sky ends up looking blown out on Samsung but the face looks right
Yeah. The pixel was miles ahead than Samsung in every ways. There's a reason why the pixel is at 2nd in dxomark. Also he prefers the oversharpening of Samsung referring it as details. He doesn't know the definition of details in a picture
Yes true, the sky looks more detailed but the face looks so artificial on the Google pixel 9 pro XL and the zoom video is so noisy. Can your eyes see anything?
This year's iteration of the pixel pro xl is commanding the same amount of money as the s24 ultra in my region which is ludicrous considering it's an inferior chip manufactured by the s24ultra manufacturer which is again overpriced for what it has to offer. Actually this whole phone thing has gone out of hand. 1300usd for phones! Jesus! It's all about incremental upgrades and whole hearted ignorance for focusing on the next year's release. Complete waste
Ese procesado de Google en sus pixel es histórico y revienta el detalle fino ,pixel arregla la foto con IA para que se vea bien a simple vista si bien en colores es bastante neutro ,en detalle es muy malo, yo que visualizo las fotos en un monitor ,el pixel ami no me sirve .
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
S24 ultra stabilization 0.6x, 1x, 5x, and 10x or 20x is way more better then pixel 9 Pro XL.
And Samsung lens switching is smoother 🎉
And photos are better IMHO
The pixel was having some visible noise at 20x video and the quality has degraded more than the samsung
@@Masked_Animations- yeah bro..
I notice that..
@@VelianSpeaksTech yeah
Factss❤❤❤
I remember some pixel fans got mad at me called me Samsung fanboy on a comment under previous video because i said that probably Samsungs zoom video is better but here we are and i was right: 2:23 2:30
Just turn off vst voice and u will see 😂
Then u need to see until the end of the video
It's hilarious to me how much people trash the Samsung cameras in comments, when they objectively perform decently. Same thing happening with animations now, a narrative forms and then suddenly everybody has a problem
Why should they? Even in this video it's clearly seen that it performs sometimes even better than the Pixel...
Of course it's no match vs most recent China phones with 3rd gen 1" Sony LYT sensors but still...
@@VelianSpeaksTech that's my point, the criticism is not deserved.
The only criticism I have of Samsung is how convoluted the settings are, and how so many features are buried away in difficult to find menus or good lock modules.
But if you enjoy tinkering with your tech like me, even this can be a rewarding experience.
I've had problem with shutter lag on Samsung phones for about 7 years
@@stevanb.2590 Samsung phones capture a photo when the user takes their finger off the shutter button, instead of when they press it. This is because the phone waits to see if the user will keep the button pressed to record a video.
This is an interface choice, not an issue with the camera itself which performs very well, as seen in this video.
@@mooseratt I could not care less if it's camera, interface or alien issue, not being able to capture decent (not great, decent = usable) shot of any moving subject, even in great light is big problem. And it has been like that on Samsung phones forever, one would think they'll do something about it. Competition solved it years ago, so there should be no excuse for unusable pictures of people, kids, pets... anything with even slight movement on 2024. flagship.
I guess there are those who don't watch it with their eyes, but the s24 ultra takes more natural and usable photos. Pixels were also beaten in the video section and stabilization.
true
S24 Ultra natural photos? My friend, please get your eyes checked, go to your local opticians and get your vision cleaned. Natural...
This is one of the best camera comparisons I have seen on RUclips, and let me tell you I have seen hundreds. It is nice how you do present the differences and your opinion is spot-on. Looks like you have experience with mirroless cameras to judge those phones. Keep up this excellent work. One thing I would love to see as extra, is some comparison on RAW files.
Tnx man, didn't got a mirror less, still use an old canon 6d eos.
Will test raw too, hope I can get to that
@@VelianSpeaksTech Thank you. I have searched about Apple ProRAW but haven't find anything on your channel. If you own any Apple iPhone 15 Pro device, it would be great if you include that too, as Apple's RAW implementation seems to be the best in the market. Thank you again.
Something that learned from the in-depth Tech reviews channel is to stop using the portrait mode altogether. Just use the standard lens and then go into edit and apply portrait after the fact. It is fully adjustable and you get a much cleaner initial image
Yes that's one option and the other is to just use the standard mode where bokeh from the lense is added, well it's not so much, but cutouts are good
Видеото на Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra пресъздава осезаемо по-добре лицевите черти, цвета на кожата, светлосенките. Това е най-важното при предната камера за самоснимки и видео, а не дали облаците на заден фон ще са една идея по-отчетливи. Да, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL пресъздава облаците малко по-добре при предното видео, защото се вижда част от синьото небе, но дотам. Лицето ти изглежда много по-ясно и естествено при Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. При Google Pixel 9 Pro XL се забелязва крайно неприятно пресилване на бялото и черното, от което страда цялата картина. Има и изкуствено изостряне, което определено вреди на усещането за естествена картина.
Колкото до задната камера, на 3:00 си личи колко зле се представя камерата на Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: големи количества шум, поне 2-3 пъти по-силно клатене на картината, кофти студени цветове. Google Pixel 9 Pro XL насича силно на всеки няколко секунди. При S24 Ultra насичането е 5 пъти по-рядко и слабо.
Прекрасно казано!
Hopefully the 6.1.1 will bring update to our S24U's camera. Less sharpening and high dynamic range will be much appreciated
I hope that too but seeing the change log...
Thr Pixel had more over sharpened photos. Did we watch the same video?
Wow what a comparison video..... Very nice 👍
Both these devices have their strengths and weaknesses. To my eye, they trade blows quite evenly in this test. What surprises me is the GULF in the ratings Dxo Mark give these two devices for both photos and videos not being replicated here or anywhere else?.
Yes...DXO mark are a thing of their own I guess :))
Yes, similar in may scenarios though S24U looks has better detail preservation, sometimes worse exposure control in the day but better in night, it's close but when you start to zoom in and nit pick the differences are visible.
The 5x and 10x from the pixel and the ultra wide seemed better to me in most scenarios.
@@VelianSpeaksTech i dont like how flashy green the s24u makes leaves and gras and trees sometimes. for me a good cam is when colors are accurate. i dont know why so much people like the "fake" colors of the s24u . and the picture with the blue pants the S24U is extremly noisy . This happends on my s24u anytime i do a indoor shot with not perfect light condition. for me this is the weakness the s24u has. its no hate against s24u its for me just a fact. every phone has pros and cons
Desaptiba octimisador de ecenas@@sviraci
That's because the ratings are based on the release versions of the handsets, and there were a LOT of issues with the S24U on release that were fixed with updates.
Front facing video from the pixel does it's best to expose the face, and I like that, much better HDR even if it comes off looking unnatural from what one would expect from your regular front facing video
Agree. For me the front video and in general the front camera on the Pixel 9 Pro XL is better.
@@VelianSpeaksTech , напротив! :) Видеото на S24 Ultra пресъздава осезаемо по-добре лицевите черти, цвета на кожата, светлосенките. Това е най-важното при предната камера за самоснимки и видео, а не дали облаците на заден фон ще са една идея по-отчетливи. Да, Google Pixel 9 Pro XL пресъздава облаците малко по-добре при предното видео, защото се вижда част от синьото небе, но дотам. Лицето ти изглежда много по-ясно и естествено при Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. При Google Pixel 9 Pro XL се забелязва крайно неприятно пресилване на бялото и черното, от което страда цялата картина. Има и изкуствено изостряне, което определено вреди на усещането за естествена картина.
Колкото до задната камера, на 3:00 си личи колко зле се представя камерата на Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: големи количества шум, поне 2-3 пъти по-силно клатене на картината, кофти цветове.
I think it’s obvious that the details in photos captured by the Pixel are more than those from the S24U. For example, at 8:29, the Pixel captures details of the floor tiles, while the Galaxy just smooths out the noise, making it look like an oil painting. Similarly, at 8:49, I don’t understand why you say the S24U has better detail preservation. From what I see, the S24U just smooths out the roof, making everything look flat and without texture.
Even though at 7:20, you said the photos from the Pixel lack details whereas the S24U looks better, I think in that scenario, both photos have a similar level of detail, only with a color difference."
Everytime I observe his video, he always prefers samsung even though its not the case. There was video on comparison of vivo x100 pro vs iphone vs samsung and he constantly was choosing samsung while iphone and vivo were giving photos much better. Atleast he preferred samsung over vivo even though it has one inch sensor. It a no brainer that he is a samsung fanboy
I never owned a Vivo X100 Pro, I had the Vivo X100 Ultra and it easily smokes the S24U in almost every category, especially in the photo domain, that's really no brainer.
Bc when you start to zoom in Pixel photos usually degrade, straight lines aren't straight, excessive sharpness is almost on every shot, and at 700% this is very visible.
The only advantages I saw in the Pixel 9 Pro XL are in the 5 and 10x and above plus also better ultra wide and selfie.
But for the back main camera this is how I see it.
Also a domain where Google was very strong the night photography.
Pixel can't control the exposure, blows the highlights, crushes the shadows, I expected that the Pixel will beat the Ultra in night, but I didn't see that happen.
I thought the Pixel was doing very well until I looked at the clouds at 14:40
In many photos the girl looks better on the Pixel.
Yes, 1:1 I see it as well like this, but when I start to zoom, the skin tones on the S24U is better, more realistic and not over sharpened.
@@VelianSpeaksTechmost of the average users, while reviewing photos in their gallery, don't go above zoom that you get with double tap. So, at least in my case, it's that first look of the photo that's most important.
@stevanb.2590 Totally agree with your assessment.
You pervert
@@stevanb.2590what the fuck logic😂ur logic matches with iphone users
Google look pale
The video stabilization and camera switching are horrible on the pixel for a $1200 phone in 2024 look at 2:37 .Samsung isn’t at the level of apple in camera switching but putting it next to the pixel shows how far ahead they are ahead of a lot of other phones WOW. 4:35 also
Thanks for the video
Once again, on the X5, the speed of the google is at 1/400 and ISO 650, while the Samsung is at 1/50 and ISO 100, so it's impossible to be sharp with such a low speed!! Samsung is limited to being at low ISO instead of managing the speed, so blurry galore
I'm sure that the photo of the pole taken by the 9 Pro XL at 10:05 was more true to life than that of the S24U... Generally speaking I prefer this style of photo and the Pixel I think does it better than the Samsung in the pics in this way. Samsung wins on video by far for its general quality. The Pixel is too mid-range phone for me in other aspects, not to mention the price which completely turns me off.
one ui 6.1.1 for s24 ultra is rolling out and first impression is excellent!
You already got it?
@@VelianSpeaksTech today it is released in Korea, USA and EU will get update on 9. septembar...i saw some Korean youtubers and they tested cameras...pictures are very cleared and detailed , dynamic range is perfect and colors is so natural!
@@VelianSpeaksTech can't wait for the new camera test with ui 6.1.1 on s24 ultra! we will see if samsung has done anything to improve the cameras!
Do a more action based comparison, where motion blur is involved. Use timer perhaps, to nail the exact moment for both phones?
Compare pixel with s23 ultra!
tengo los 2 moviles insiguia de samsung . S23 ultra y hace poco el s24 ultra , hay una revolucion en el procesado de imagenes para el s24 ultra. natural seria la palabra y ami personalmente me convence ,es agradable a la vista que el detalle en una imagen resulte natural. valoro el detalle de tu video porque muestra la capacidad real de las camaras de estos smarphones en otros canales comparan fotos a simple vista y sacan conclusiones sin profundizar como lo hiciste tu.
Pozdrav iz Srbije!
Pixel vidoe jitter alot than s24 ultra
This comparison was so comprehensive that I fell asleep. KUDOS on the effort
Thanks for the feedback!
For me, the S24 Ultra is a better photophone and simply a better smartphone.
The days when Pixels were the best at photography and iPhones at video, have been over for at least 3-4 years, people just refuse to admit it 🤷🏽♂️
The Pixel 9 Pro XL is not bad, it's even very good, but, as I always say and contrary to what people say and think, Pixels (since Pixel 5) do not necessarily have a natural colorimetry, they just have a constant colorimetry and white balance, very often pleasant , but not necessarily natural.
And honestly, I don't see myself putting or recommending putting $1200 in a smartphone that, apart from the zoom, is no better than an S23 Plus which currently costs $600 🤷🏽♂️
OK so what's with all the talk I've been seeing online about Samsung having average to below average cameras and Pixels being the king of photography?
Honestly, it didn't seem that way to me after watching this vid and in some cases the Samsung just straight up beat the Pixel.
Both cameras seem really good but I can't in good conscience say the Pixel dominated or was the "king of photos", not even close.
S24U beats in many areas for sure
Videos better on the s24 ultra overall.
Photos go to the pixel mostly
Edit: i take it back s24 ultra photos and videos.. i tried giving the pixel some points but nah
Hahahaha you are laughable 🤡 don’t be biased clown 🤡
I love how pixel photos are mich amazing ❤😊
Should have tested moving subjects, especially indoors. That's where Samsung devices fall apart and Pixels have been pretty good. A lot of people I know switched to Pixel/Iphone due to unusable pictures of their kids. Daylight and nature is an easy task even for midrangers these days.
Samsung phones suffer from a slow shutter lag in auto mode, it can be remediated with pron controls but iPhone and Pixels are far better in these scenarios for sure.
Totally agree with you
@VelianSpeaksTech can you do a settings video for indoor lighting as least one we can use as a template
@@VelianSpeaksTechyeah, because of that, the first thing that should be tested when it comes to cameras on Samsung is shutter lag/motion blur. Dxomark, as much as they aren't objective, has that simple test with one person walking towards another in indoor conditions.
This guy really likes to zoom into pictures. At least you can take 50mp on pixel if u need to zoom. Samsung a well
For the guy
More natural= More saturated
I love the pixels software and photography, but the video is still not there yet, its getting better but come on google I want to get another pixel phone and dump my boring iPhone. I have heard that the pixel 9 pro does bad video against sunlight. The voice typing and call screening are such lovely features though, I'm torn.
We will get one ui 6.1.1 camera update within next 7 days. Kindly review it. Also do before after comparison please
Not sure if it will have any camera improvements, but we will definitely check
Like Pixel photos and videos better on most clips until you start to zoom in. But, who zoom in on 12mp photos. If we plan on zooming in, don't we use 50mp
Videos , no doubt s24 ultra is clear and even in photos mostly i'd pick the samsung
I think pixel procceses too much and compromises detail to make the image look better when u dont zoom in it. Wich just makes it as good as Samsung because Samsung is just the other way around. So its about what u prefer there's no best option on that department.
True. I like how vibrant Sammy is, but I also like how pixel process photos, if you don't nit pick, they are quite good tbh...
Wanted to show this in my review...
@VelianSpeaksTech yeah only big difference was in selfies and stabilization was definitely better on Samsung, buy on selfies idk I prefer how the Samsung keeps the skin tones a little warm and not too contrasty on the face shadows while the pixel is the other way around because it's trying to not overexpose the scene around the face like Samsung does and the sky ends up looking blown out on Samsung but the face looks right
Selfie camera is way better on the new pixel❤
Pixel ❤❤❤❤
Horrible processing on the subject which is you on the pixel 9 but better sky rendition.
❤❤❤❤❤
pixel 9 pro xl vs Note 20 ultra will be fine😂😂
Am i the only one who like pixel pics more😂?
Me too. It almost looked like he was thinking that the pictures were the other way around. I was like WHAT? Every time he said that s24 u was sharper
Yeah. The pixel was miles ahead than Samsung in every ways. There's a reason why the pixel is at 2nd in dxomark.
Also he prefers the oversharpening of Samsung referring it as details. He doesn't know the definition of details in a picture
Damn the ISO is so high on the S24 Ultra as compared to the Pixel 9 Pro XL.
Yes...
maka a compare with pixel 9 pro xl vs galaxy note 20 ultra
The Pixel's clouds are terrible at 14:40
Easy win for s24 ultra
since when pixel photos became so oversaturated?? 😮 was there an update or something? I don't like it
Yes true, the sky looks more detailed but the face looks so artificial on the Google pixel 9 pro XL and the zoom video is so noisy. Can your eyes see anything?
This year's iteration of the pixel pro xl is commanding the same amount of money as the s24 ultra in my region which is ludicrous considering it's an inferior chip manufactured by the s24ultra manufacturer which is again overpriced for what it has to offer. Actually this whole phone thing has gone out of hand. 1300usd for phones! Jesus! It's all about incremental upgrades and whole hearted ignorance for focusing on the next year's release. Complete waste
Fake colour . worst processor in this price range.
not recommanded for professional photography...go and compare this with midrange budget phone
1. Pixel nemá téměř žádnou aktualizaci.
2. Barvy Samsung jsou nepřesné
3. Nikdo jej nezvětší na 200 %
4. Pixel prostě vypadá lépe
Ese procesado de Google en sus pixel es histórico y revienta el detalle fino ,pixel arregla la foto con IA para que se vea bien a simple vista si bien en colores es bastante neutro ,en detalle es muy malo, yo que visualizo las fotos en un monitor ,el pixel ami no me sirve .
S24 ultra destroyed the pixel in almost department.
Велян пробвай да инсталираш вируси върху windows
s24 ultra is natural camera
Google pixel over
comparing a Squid with a Shark...😂
Don’t like that selfie camera on Samsung is so narrow
Sharper doesn't mean better
Sharper is usually worse for me...
👍🙏😊
if the s24u your using doesn't have 6.1.1 then im not interested cause its outdated
All I heard was you breathing heavily.
worst processor in this price range.
not recommanded for professional photography...go and compare this with midrange budget phone
I think he doesn’t know how to take punches i watch the pixel text by photographers i will take their advice and not from this big mouth RUclipsr
This guy is unfit.... You're breathing is a giveaway... Work on your cardio.
not even close to s24 ultra
Google best camera
It's really good
Google miles ahead in image processing 😊
Fake colour . worst processor in this price range.
not recommanded for professional photography...go and compare this with midrange budget phone