Take a ride inside Ehang’s fully autonomous, two-seater air taxi

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 янв 2025

Комментарии • 459

  • @CNBCi
    @CNBCi  8 месяцев назад +13

    *Thank you for watching. This video is a part of a four-part CNBC Tech series on eVTOLS. You can check out the other parts below:*
    • What are eVTOLS? The evolution of 'flying cars' explained - ruclips.net/video/7gLBJpnmAo8/видео.html
    • Inside Alef, the company trying to build a car you can both drive and fly - ruclips.net/video/qtzuL3WSiGY/видео.html
    • Inside Lilium, the German company trying to revolutionize air travel - ruclips.net/video/4hxk30BTwgY/видео.html

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +1

      Why do you lend legitamcy to this fraudulent enterprise? No range numbers, no duration numbers, no recharge times, no video of passengers carried.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 6 месяцев назад

      I'm sorry, but that is not a marketable product.

  • @alileevil
    @alileevil 8 месяцев назад +140

    The USA: This is a national security risk.

  • @ateksudianto6237
    @ateksudianto6237 8 месяцев назад +181

    at least this is safer than boeing

    • @siakakone6021
      @siakakone6021 8 месяцев назад +2

      Safer…🤦🏾‍♂️

    • @HaharuRecords
      @HaharuRecords 7 месяцев назад

      Tell me what have you found unsafe in Boeing? Just curious to know😊

    • @辛Mario
      @辛Mario 6 месяцев назад

      @@HaharuRecords didn't you watch news at all? Boeing crashed multiple times before. it doesn't give a damn about civilians' lives

    • @westwind2000
      @westwind2000 5 месяцев назад +3

      Tire and door fell off the sky😂​@@HaharuRecords

    • @cmoonkite
      @cmoonkite 3 месяца назад +3

      ​@HaharuRecords watch Australia 60 minutes about the 2 Ethiopian 737 max plane crashes caused by Boeing software issues. Etc Etc

  • @tonywei423
    @tonywei423 7 месяцев назад +30

    EH216-s already start commercial flight 2 weeks ago in Shenzhen, the city will open 200 air routes by the end of 2025, more Chinese cities will start to follow, the low attitude air economy is starting, also more parcels will transport by low attitude air virtual highway in the near future.

    • @ankHank-fs1zr
      @ankHank-fs1zr 20 дней назад +1

      low 👉altitude👈
      Keep up with the excellent works, China. 🇨🇳

  • @atiqulbasher
    @atiqulbasher 8 месяцев назад +42

    America: Let Market determine who is the winner!
    Also America: Stop China from entering our Markets!!

  • @wroughtforge7547
    @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад +81

    China advancement mind blowing.

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@sphudson
      Batteries are portable. If you have any knowledge of the Coriolis effect , you would know that 20 miles means 150 to 180 miles of travel distance. In civilian aircraft 80 mph is like driving 300mph on the road. Please get educated

  • @passby8070
    @passby8070 8 месяцев назад +39

    I can see that this can be used as express transport between high congestion areas or difficult terrain such as across a large body of water or steep mountains.

    • @richardwilde1348
      @richardwilde1348 Месяц назад

      A follow up question is whether this tech is scalable. Certainly not with two seaters, but with bigger electric aircraft carrying 8 or 16 passengers, you can start moving decent numbers of people over that kind of terrain, or just over large distances.

  • @jathomas0910
    @jathomas0910 23 дня назад +12

    Is this what’s flying over NJ

  • @benjinlama8108
    @benjinlama8108 22 дня назад +11

    Just watched a video of Ben Shapiro saying China lacks innovation😂

  • @dhickey5919
    @dhickey5919 8 месяцев назад +80

    Wow. Back in the US we have Boeing.... sigh.

    • @xx133
      @xx133 8 месяцев назад +11

      We don’t even a modern public transportation and high speed rail system.

    • @Pyramid1974
      @Pyramid1974 8 месяцев назад +4

      No worries, I live in Florida and I have the answer to the whole evtol thing.. regardless of the electric part.. I just don't yet have the knowledge of being able to take what is in my head and put it down onto something and 3d print it or whatever.. I'm just a paraplegic guy living in his bedroom.. But I intend to figure these things out.. and when I do it will change the world.. Laugh if any wants to, I get it.. lol but mark my words..

    • @destinywhitehouse8247
      @destinywhitehouse8247 8 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@Pyramid1974 I believe you

    • @timothylee2772
      @timothylee2772 8 месяцев назад +1

      Boeing track record in safety: 🤣🤣🤣👎👎👎👎

    • @Manosdepiedra1979
      @Manosdepiedra1979 8 месяцев назад +1

      wumao bot need some reprogramming. Need to look up the term EVTOL.

  • @darealbrianpark
    @darealbrianpark 8 месяцев назад +136

    China is fast, USA is slow.

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 8 месяцев назад +10

      When you take shortcuts for everything you can get things done faster.

    • @davidz7858
      @davidz7858 8 месяцев назад

      @@supertec2023 when everything has to deal with political correctness, you can't do anything. American workers are spoiled and too lazy. Also, people become more and more greedy, most smart people study for medical school, law school, finance, and you can see there are a lot of unqualified students in STEM fields and school has to Lower the standards so they can pass the Ph.D. qualifying exam

    • @yuglobalcitizen2246
      @yuglobalcitizen2246 8 месяцев назад +22

      ​@@supertec2023yep China wants u to keep thinking like that.

    • @ytfanlingeric
      @ytfanlingeric 8 месяцев назад +9

      @@supertec2023 Development of infrastructure like the high-speed railway system in the US is not taking shortcuts, that is definitely the American way to go.

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon 8 месяцев назад +4

      China now has an electric bicycle that runs on solid hydrogen!

  • @raideepu4
    @raideepu4 8 месяцев назад +44

    Ehang and Xpeng are the pioneers in AEV and EVTOL.

  • @BrandyHeng007
    @BrandyHeng007 8 месяцев назад +83

    US still using pilot driven helicopters
    China getting more advance by using pilotless, auto driven eVTOL

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      You mean passengerless.

    • @LH1xx
      @LH1xx 8 месяцев назад +3

      @@yukon4511 Pilotless, passengers can be inside.

    • @xx133
      @xx133 8 месяцев назад +6

      No, you definitely want pilots. I don’t want my life in the hands of a primitive AI system. Trust me airlines want to replace of pilots, and are working to reduce pilots in cockpit from 2 to 1. Surely nothing will go wrong.
      Let’s start by building a decent public transportation system and high speed rail. Far cheaper safer efficient and cost effective.

    • @LH1xx
      @LH1xx 8 месяцев назад

      @@xx133 I trust AI pilots, I can't trust so many pilots who fly their machines on top of your head who may be alcoholics or drug addicts.

    • @Manosdepiedra1979
      @Manosdepiedra1979 8 месяцев назад

      Yeah that must be it. Nothing to do with regulation. Ofc in China no one cares if you get killed in one of these things but in the west people do care.

  • @adtiamzon3663
    @adtiamzon3663 8 месяцев назад +8

    😍 Transformational air taxi, indeed. eHang 🇨🇳😲👏👏🤝🌞

  • @justme6275
    @justme6275 8 месяцев назад +10

    wow, endless possibilities with this...

  • @chinkongfah9377
    @chinkongfah9377 7 месяцев назад +27

    US: Dare to dream
    China: Dare to do.

    • @SometimesIamNot
      @SometimesIamNot 7 месяцев назад +2

      That is so called American dream.

  • @abqchris2
    @abqchris2 26 дней назад +6

    And here are your “UAP” drones over New Jersey 😂

  • @dungeonmaster16
    @dungeonmaster16 13 дней назад

    Besides regulations stuff like emergencies if one of the propellers go out, how high is it allowed from areas with heavy foot traffic, is it allowed in city/towns or only used in open fields and land/park at a airport only and more. Then of course costs and knowledge to get and use one of these if one day available for purchase and needing a pilots license for it.

  • @rominho151
    @rominho151 8 месяцев назад +57

    IS the future!

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 8 месяцев назад

      No it's not

    • @ppen8359
      @ppen8359 8 месяцев назад +1

      What about privacy? Everything is server-controlled. The Chinese government may fly you directly to prison.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +1

      What about internet and cable outages? Happens here frequently.

    • @SandyHernandez-v7q
      @SandyHernandez-v7q 7 месяцев назад +1

      Is a disaster

    • @srappytrex3946
      @srappytrex3946 Месяц назад

      @@ppen8359 Can't, it only fly for 25 mins and prison is far away.

  • @btbrotherton
    @btbrotherton 16 дней назад +1

    Why are they putting all the propellers at the perfect level to cut you in half?

  • @Wunderpus-photogenicus
    @Wunderpus-photogenicus 8 месяцев назад +22

    Although all these major achievements are great (amazingly fast and effective constructions of infrastructures, high-speed rail, airports, space station, lunar explorations, EVs, battery technology, AI leadership, aircraft carriers, money-less payment systems, etc., etc.), however the most important aspect and characteristics of China is its peaceful nature in its global policies. The friendliness of its population toward visiting guests is another beauty of China. The tasty and affordable food variety also helps a lot.

    • @gndeka1188
      @gndeka1188 7 месяцев назад +3

      China's neighbours have other opinion on its friendliness. Ask philipines

    • @Wunderpus-photogenicus
      @Wunderpus-photogenicus 7 месяцев назад

      @@gndeka1188 if you ask a “slave/dog under the gun” these kinds of questions, it is meaningless; any wrong move by the slaver will inevitably result in severe whipping by his master ( sanctions; military threats, including forced occupation; force colonization and murders like last time; etc). If you are truly serious, you should ask someone (country) who is totally independent (militarily and politically), and has a mind of his own.

    • @Wunderpus-photogenicus
      @Wunderpus-photogenicus 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@gndeka1188 To ask the Philippine you have to ask its master, just like one has to ask a dog owner. No disrespect to the Filipino people, but unfortunately that is exactly what their leaders are doing.

    • @Broodjemetbeleg
      @Broodjemetbeleg 2 месяца назад +1

      @@gndeka1188 you never asked yourself why?

    • @srappytrex3946
      @srappytrex3946 Месяц назад

      @@gndeka1188 As if Philipines are a friendly neighbor to be friends with.....

  • @Paiadakine
    @Paiadakine 3 месяца назад +2

    There should be a safety zone around this aircraft

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +7

    What are your range and duration numbers?

    • @james_l4337
      @james_l4337 8 месяцев назад +4

      30km for recent certified one (EH216-S) for inner city travel, tourism, 2 passengers. Max 130km/hr or 10m/sec
      ~50m height, depending on regulations.
      Mass production beginning this year
      AutoPilot another company (video public) prototype 250km, 5 passengers speed 200km/hr max 400kg
      For between cities travel & within
      estimate roll out 2026
      Etc.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      @@james_l4337 I anxiously await their sales figures.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      @@james_l4337 Wishing them all the success!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      @@james_l4337 I anxiously await the sales figures.

    • @Manosdepiedra1979
      @Manosdepiedra1979 7 месяцев назад

      @@james_l4337 what about cost though?

  • @walungamaandrewkiyingi3780
    @walungamaandrewkiyingi3780 8 месяцев назад +9

    Can the flying taxi be customized to simpler missions like ranch rovers? That is a replacement for choppers that large land ranchers and other agro/conservation teams use

    • @gulyascredo
      @gulyascredo 8 месяцев назад +5

      You have DJI for that. The top drone manufacturer in the world by far, and widely used in agriculture and forestry. Check it out.

    • @lunlunqq
      @lunlunqq 8 месяцев назад +2

      The DJI matrice series maybe what you are looking for. While DJI had a few series of drone for industrial/agricultural used, check them out.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      Can you fly in the DJI drone?

  • @joosiekawk
    @joosiekawk 8 месяцев назад +3

    they should upgrade it with some type of skirt to cover the rotating wings

    • @srappytrex3946
      @srappytrex3946 Месяц назад +1

      They already consider it, the design is to put extra set of rotating wings (16), it flys without problem with 5 wings stop working.

    • @epiphanshiperson200
      @epiphanshiperson200 Месяц назад +2

      the skirt or cage would worsen the efficiency of such a drone resulting in shorter distance and lower flight altitude.

  • @r.a.8618
    @r.a.8618 8 месяцев назад +4

    Helicopter: uses internal combustion engine that consumes diesel and requires a pilot
    eVTOL: uses motors which consume electricity stored in batteries and doesn't need a pilot

  • @mbo7613
    @mbo7613 Месяц назад

    Love the concept. What safety systems are available in case of a mechanical failure? How does it evade objects in flight? With no fan shroud, what prevents unintentional injury to bystanders during takeoff and landing?

  • @yzhang9265
    @yzhang9265 17 дней назад

    Keep going Yihang!

  • @syncmaster915n
    @syncmaster915n 8 месяцев назад +12

    Futuristic China 👍👍

  • @Paiadakine
    @Paiadakine 3 месяца назад

    Very nice. I hope they are successful.

  • @randomnerd112
    @randomnerd112 21 день назад +2

    So it's a helicopter but more dangerous and cheaper?

  • @diamondgalore372
    @diamondgalore372 8 месяцев назад +14

    Ehang 🎉

  • @user-sk4gj3ji3o
    @user-sk4gj3ji3o 7 месяцев назад

    Commercial success of any projects depends on the phisibilty and viability of the concept. However the idea is not bad .

  • @PaulADAigle
    @PaulADAigle 8 месяцев назад +1

    Why wouldn't you put the propellers above the cockpit? It seems safer that way.

    • @stephenchurchill682
      @stephenchurchill682 8 месяцев назад

      My Guess: Because the batteries that supply the power in those arms are so heavy that if put overhead, the center of gravity will be too high.

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle 8 месяцев назад

      @@stephenchurchill682 That would make sense, only those are what lift it.

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад

      Interesting that you don’t even have an engineering degree

    • @PaulADAigle
      @PaulADAigle 8 месяцев назад

      @@wroughtforge7547 I don't? Says who?

    • @suportm782
      @suportm782 6 месяцев назад

      why bother inventing a drone when you have helicopters.

  • @JBaxter-pi8oj
    @JBaxter-pi8oj 8 месяцев назад

    What happens in the scenario where the passengers may have to take over the operation of this aircraft. Is this possible?

    • @wengv
      @wengv 7 месяцев назад +1

      I think you can only give the command to where you wanted to go.

    • @srappytrex3946
      @srappytrex3946 Месяц назад +1

      You mean to let the passenger who is not certified to fly aircraft to control it? I don't think so, but I guess the passengers can contact the center control who can change the operation

    • @JBaxter-pi8oj
      @JBaxter-pi8oj Месяц назад

      @@srappytrex3946 I realize that it isn't the best idea to let non certified people fly the aircraft. However, knowing that things do go wrong I was trying to find some way that might (yes, only might) prevent the aircraft fall like a stone! It's only one reason among many that I prefer to let ethical, honest professionals deal with such things. Best wishes!

  • @rickdeckard9810
    @rickdeckard9810 8 месяцев назад +5

    This better have a ballistic parachute.

    • @肖宣羽
      @肖宣羽 8 месяцев назад

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 8 месяцев назад

      Most do

    • @yishujia186
      @yishujia186 8 месяцев назад +2

      This thing is supposed to fly at low attitude. There will not be enough time for you to decelerate and land safely.

  • @Neil.C57510
    @Neil.C57510 8 месяцев назад +19

    No roll cage, no shielded fans, no ballistic low/high parachutes + airbags. Your doomed if that falls out the sky.

    • @colin1235421
      @colin1235421 8 месяцев назад +3

      Agree, safety needs to come first...

    • @Kabab
      @Kabab 8 месяцев назад +13

      While I'm not particularly keen on this company, it is an X16 craft which means it has essentially 4x redundancy. You can lose any 4 propellers/motors at a minimum and still land fine. You could probably lose a maximum of 10 propellers/motors and still get on the ground with minor to no injuries. At least this is how the craft should and probably is designed.
      A roll cage or parachute isn't going to make much if any difference if you fall from a height of ~200-300ft. The parachute will have very limited time to deploy even if it's predicted on time.
      All this being said, I would prefer a traditional helicopter with a very long proven track record

    • @zsarimaxim692
      @zsarimaxim692 8 месяцев назад +10

      So when are we going to have parachute for 747?

    • @merrick6484
      @merrick6484 8 месяцев назад +4

      Yellen is more worry about over capacity.😆

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon 8 месяцев назад

      Solid Hydrogen is the answer!

  • @ALWH1314
    @ALWH1314 8 месяцев назад +1

    I wonder how to police this, what kind of traffic rules like speed limit, traffic crossing, criminal activity….?

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 8 месяцев назад +3

      You have to start from some points, and improving down the road.

    • @oemcargps
      @oemcargps 6 месяцев назад

      Computer controlled route, not that complicated.

  • @ahopefiend1867
    @ahopefiend1867 9 дней назад

    This is so much better than hearing "AI AI AI AI"

  • @andyhughes1776
    @andyhughes1776 8 месяцев назад +8

    Exposed spinning propellers so low to the ground present a serious safety issue.
    At least helicopter rotors spin above people's heads.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +4

      Indeed. You (and I) are the only people who seem to recognize this serious design fault.

    • @DemPilafian
      @DemPilafian 8 месяцев назад +1

      If you just turn your body sideways, there's more than enough space to get to the aircraft door without being turned into hamburger.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@DemPilafian You first

    • @DemPilafian
      @DemPilafian 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@yukon4511 Eeew. Are you a cannibal?

    • @АгронДепартье
      @АгронДепартье 8 месяцев назад +3

      There too many customers, so some will survive...

  • @graceantonio3573
    @graceantonio3573 8 месяцев назад +3

    ❤😊❤😂❤😊❤😂❤ WOW! ONLY IN CHINA I GUESS.... WHO CAN AFFORD IT IN PHILIPPINES? LOOKS REALY COOL & BEAT THE TRAFFIC HERE AHAHAHAAAAA!

  • @udhelhc
    @udhelhc 8 месяцев назад +6

    Go China, Go Ehang

  • @TheBagOfHolding
    @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад +9

    How much can they lift and for how long or for what diatance? They need to prove its possible not show edited videos of people and empty crafts combined through editing.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      CandyKanette no they don't. They are all edited. Find a full flight with a person in one.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      CandyKanette you are mistaken. It's not possible for anyone because of the square cube law in physics. Find any video from anyone that it's possible. If it was there would be a full video of a full flight not videos edited with people and empty crafts. Find proof a person can get in one then take off and stay up 4 minutes. They will be edited if they even try to show that. You just think there is proof but you will not find any if you look l.

    • @ChinaSongsCollection
      @ChinaSongsCollection 8 месяцев назад +10

      That's a stupid comment.
      EHang has been operating commercially in the countryside in China for YEARS!!
      You can find western reporters flying in those EHang autonomous drones from at least 2 years ago on RUclips.
      The certification for commercial operations is specifically for those cities concerned.
      (It never had permission to fly in the cities until now)

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      @ChinaSongsCollection lies. If it was operating for years then a tourist would upload a complete flight on a video. The only flights are edited and made by the company or shills.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      @ChinaSongsCollection what video do you think is proof? What is the title?

  • @ram50228
    @ram50228 7 месяцев назад

    The key takeout is "tridimensional aerial traffic" to 2035; very impressive. In comparison, EEUU to date, does not even have high speed trains.

  • @user-yt-13245
    @user-yt-13245 18 дней назад

    5:08 wow

  • @bogdanivchenko3723
    @bogdanivchenko3723 8 месяцев назад +3

    2:55 you see how there are 2 headphones? He didn't fly it.

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela 8 месяцев назад +4

      It's autonomous. You don't fly it, you just get inside and it takes you to your destination.

    • @vervetech9395
      @vervetech9395 8 месяцев назад

      You weren't listening 😂

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад

      One is for the other passenger

  • @dukbokki9281
    @dukbokki9281 8 месяцев назад +8

    EH stock going to the moon!

    • @supertec2023
      @supertec2023 8 месяцев назад +1

      😂😂😂😂 sure lol

    • @a.m.doesit9347
      @a.m.doesit9347 8 месяцев назад +2

      Who's here cause they bought at 120$ and still bag holding

    • @EbenezerNimh
      @EbenezerNimh 8 месяцев назад +1

      Well see

  • @Ballin10X
    @Ballin10X 24 дня назад

    EHang to the moon! $EH

  • @edithh1985e
    @edithh1985e 3 месяца назад

    There is no technology that does not break. These cars will break in air and crash. I think putting parachotes in seats (that it would be easy to pull out) and door to open easily would help greatly.

  • @mw6563
    @mw6563 8 месяцев назад +2

    I am not aware of the FAA certifying “autonomous” passenger flight. If the FAA did someday sign off, the first fatal crashes (for any reason) would force a pilot to be added on board. Passengers like pilots to be on their aircraft.

    • @Goodfellow1234567
      @Goodfellow1234567 8 месяцев назад +4

      @mw6563, how many car crashes occur in US daily? 6.1 million car accidents in US per year, almost 40k are fatal. The government didn't stop people from driving.

    • @chingtuckmeng1122
      @chingtuckmeng1122 8 месяцев назад +7

      we dont give a f about your US FAA

    • @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane
      @308_Negra_Arroyo_Lane 8 месяцев назад +6

      The same FAA that allowed Boeing to certify itself?

    • @DaddyBear205
      @DaddyBear205 8 месяцев назад

      This will never happen

    • @suportm782
      @suportm782 6 месяцев назад

      FAA's remit does not extend to China.

  • @PSModelling
    @PSModelling 13 дней назад

    Helicopter v2?

  • @nucu9407
    @nucu9407 8 месяцев назад +3

    The US :" It's a national security threat to the US and our lapdogs. It must be owned by the Americans or we'll have the world to outflank Ehang!"

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 День назад

    those exposed propellers look very dangerous

  • @apemzheng7914
    @apemzheng7914 7 месяцев назад +2

    It seems like a bigger drones.😂

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 День назад

    ya but when the system crashes, so does the vehicle and you inside

  • @kar_singh
    @kar_singh 3 месяца назад

    Too loud. They need to be quiet, fast, safe and cheap to use. Imagine 30-40 buzzing around at a time.

  • @fahmad7194
    @fahmad7194 23 дня назад +1

    China is the country ahead 😉

  • @ZJProductionHK
    @ZJProductionHK 4 месяца назад

    C the financial statement, they impair all the prevoous sales and stand with this confidence. Lmao

  • @3066961
    @3066961 8 месяцев назад +1

    WAS he really inside????????

    • @jojo-ep2pp
      @jojo-ep2pp 8 месяцев назад +3

      watch more youtube videos about Ehang

    • @3066961
      @3066961 8 месяцев назад

      @@jojo-ep2pp it's not helping

  • @khoichokdee5841
    @khoichokdee5841 21 день назад

    Why aren't you telling the AMERICAN'S that these AIR TAXI'S is what is flying all over AMERICA, especially New Jersey now? 12/15/24

  • @a.m.doesit9347
    @a.m.doesit9347 8 месяцев назад +2

    Whos here cause they bought @ 120 and still bag holding

    • @fozzy7591
      @fozzy7591 5 месяцев назад

      Bro lost all his money and is coping 😂😂😂

  • @Sr_art_3862
    @Sr_art_3862 8 месяцев назад +4

    If it wants to becomes an air taxi. But cannot produced in high volumes. The logical consequence is the end price for consumers to pay will be much higher than regular land taxis due to high demand. Not many people can afford it. So how this type of aircraft can solve urban traffic congestions?

    • @meenakshikalita8353
      @meenakshikalita8353 8 месяцев назад +14

      If it can become like uber(air uber here)..atleast fare wise,many people will defintely use it and slowly it will become accessible to the masses.Provided it clears all the safety measures too

    • @jwt4377
      @jwt4377 8 месяцев назад +7

      Currently, its fares are cheaper and shorter than ordinary taxis because air routes can be closer to straight lines.

    • @Betweoxwitegan
      @Betweoxwitegan 8 месяцев назад

      It can't, it's not even designed for that. This is just some idiots idea which sounded cool, looked cool and probably got a lot of government grants because it's seemingly technologically innovative, thus it becomes a status symbol that only the rich will buy and be able to afford. This is not a solution to traffic congestion because it's an inefficient form of transportation. its aim is to replace helicopters but is it even more efficient and commercially viable than a helicopter? The solution is public transportation not eVTOLS.

    • @FifthGate
      @FifthGate 8 месяцев назад +2

      It's available on Taobao right now. The EH216-S.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      ​@jwt4377 do you think they are currently operating as taxis? Where are the videos of the passangers? Wouldn't a tourist record the entire flight from boarding to unboarding instead of a few seconds? It's not even real and they can't lift a person for 5 minutes.

  • @TTS888
    @TTS888 15 дней назад

    That’s what I need compared to commercial domestic flight

  • @The38alt
    @The38alt 8 месяцев назад +3

    It's crazy you only put in where you're going. It's automated flight so what if it runs into another aircraft because of the system? What is the battery life cycle of each charge that they think it's a viable air transport

    • @ChinaSongsCollection
      @ChinaSongsCollection 8 месяцев назад +4

      This is actually NOT new.
      EHang has been operating in the countrysides of China for YEARS! And there's never been any issues.
      ( I don't know why the video didn't mention this.
      The certification for commercial operations is specifically for those cities concerned.
      As far as I know, the company has been in service for years! )

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon 8 месяцев назад +2

      Solid Hydrogen and they could fly all day!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      battery life? are you kidding? they go nowhere.

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@yukon4511 HYDROGEN!

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      Liquid or gasous?

  • @Xind0898
    @Xind0898 8 месяцев назад

    isn't this essentially a electric and lite helicopter?

  • @DrewWithington
    @DrewWithington 5 месяцев назад

    Maybe they've killed all the GEESE in China, but in other parts of the world they fly about in V-shaped flocks that aircraft + helicopters have to avoid. Because if they don't avoid the geese and collide with them they tend to crash. E.g. US Airways flight 1549 in 2009. How does this autonomous aerial vehicle avoid geese???

  • @obsun001
    @obsun001 2 месяца назад

    China is so advanced. In future the drone taxi may carry critically ill patient to the hospital in minutes, saving life & time on traffic jam😮

  • @ianchu8232
    @ianchu8232 23 дня назад

    Imagine when you take a suitcase with you, it's easy to hit a propeller when you get off. Assuming the propeller has stopped spinning, you might just damage the propeller. If it hasn't stopped, worse things happen. Propellers have cut off so many heads in history. Watch out.

    • @ankHank-fs1zr
      @ankHank-fs1zr 20 дней назад

      stay away from drugs and alcohol

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 7 месяцев назад

    What makes you think a 15 minute flight ONLY to a location with a fast charger is a marketable product?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад +2

      What makes you feel everyone needs to fly 2 hours to a destination? Plenty of situations when you just need to cross a channel, island hopping, tourism, getting from a city center to an airport, all these and more can be just a few kilometers away.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 7 месяцев назад +1

      @petrbecak7092 well, one reason is no other company has ever dared market a 20 mile aircraft. Then add 1 to 2 hours of charging on every flight, and you have an unmarkeyable product. For 400 grand? Please!

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      ​@@yukon4511How about Volocopter which is second behind Ehang in AAM reality index? "Range: 27 km (17 m) Flight Time: 27 minutes."

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 7 месяцев назад

      @@petrbecak7092 How can you fly people to an airport in an aircraft that has no provision for baggage?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      @@yukon4511 not true, there's a space for luggage... not a large one though...

  • @yukon4511
    @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +7

    After years of developement, they post a video with no indication of passengers in flight. Should be clear to the world that
    this craft can lift batteries or people, but not both.

    • @FifthGate
      @FifthGate 8 месяцев назад +7

      A simple search results in many videos. They're already being used in Dubai. CNBC chose to post this particular video.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад +2

      @seokjin3000 What's your point? Battery-powered flying cars don't work.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      @@FifthGate they are not being used. Why wouldn't a tourist or passanger make a video of their trip on one? Anyone that rode something like that would record it. It's fraudulent vaporware.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад

      @@FifthGate no such video exists.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      @@FifthGate Indeed. A simple search will reveal these toys will not carry people and batteries.

  • @silentstormstudio4782
    @silentstormstudio4782 8 месяцев назад +1

    Air taxi vs helicopter ?

  • @DemPilafian
    @DemPilafian 8 месяцев назад +3

    It's both an air taxi and the world's largest hamburger maker.

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      The West would never accept such a design fault.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      Are you sure about that? It's flying in Spain already and has in the US...

  • @Brad_Fallon
    @Brad_Fallon 8 месяцев назад +1

    If they used Solid Hydrogen and they could fly all day!

  • @Y2Kvids
    @Y2Kvids 8 месяцев назад +1

    Taylor Swift watching carefully

  • @tiramisu8359
    @tiramisu8359 8 месяцев назад

    why not DJI scale up their drone to make it man size? they have all the expertise, data, and intelligence.

  • @Insight_Compass
    @Insight_Compass 8 месяцев назад +2

    Interesting...

  • @mxweng
    @mxweng 8 месяцев назад

    I hope this is safe enough for average consumers; I don't want to be next Kobe Bryant.

  • @somerset006
    @somerset006 8 месяцев назад +1

    No worries. Teslas will fly AUTONOMOUSLY by the end of next year.

  • @ClaudiaMixon-r8n
    @ClaudiaMixon-r8n 3 месяца назад

    Blick Stravenue

  • @ashishbhoi9565
    @ashishbhoi9565 8 месяцев назад

    where are all the birds ?
    what if a bird hit the open propellers ?

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад +1

      Vertical propellers don’t suck birds in like jet engines

    • @rschulzejr
      @rschulzejr 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@wroughtforge7547 With 8 motors, there is some redundancy. In certain cases you can lose 2 and descend in a spiral pattern. Or keep flying if they are on opposite sides

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад

      @@rschulzejr
      If you still use propeller technology you are absolutely right. Except now in the 21st century, they use something called AI.

    • @suportm782
      @suportm782 6 месяцев назад

      Emergency vehicle wide parachute makes sense and easy to implement.

  • @renealvarado3658
    @renealvarado3658 8 месяцев назад +6

    Wow an helicopter 🚁 revolution 😂😂😂

    • @simonyapp
      @simonyapp 8 месяцев назад +1

      With far less noise, emissions and cost.

    • @renealvarado3658
      @renealvarado3658 7 месяцев назад

      @@simonyapp try to be close to an helicopter the amount of wind it generates is just to much to be effective for everyday transportation and it is still to noisy and the flying range is ridiculously dangerous and it decreases at each fly !

  • @helix1061
    @helix1061 7 дней назад

    The Chinese are moving ahead. The US is mired in regulations.

  • @kdr955
    @kdr955 5 месяцев назад

    Oceangate Titan of the skies.

  • @polo-kf6yh
    @polo-kf6yh 6 месяцев назад

    Can we put a tariff on it already, before it gets over capacitated. 😂

  • @MaxMustermann-zr6kf
    @MaxMustermann-zr6kf 6 месяцев назад

    They must be silent if a sane government would allow them to fly in cities.

  • @wenaldy
    @wenaldy 3 месяца назад

    Might be cheap alternative of air ambulance

  • @supertec2023
    @supertec2023 8 месяцев назад +3

    Oh hell no.

  • @ronglenn919
    @ronglenn919 8 месяцев назад +1

    All we have in the USA are guns and boats..

  • @supersmart671
    @supersmart671 7 месяцев назад

    Bring it to Kerala, India

  • @WhiteheadVogt-s8v
    @WhiteheadVogt-s8v 3 месяца назад

    Manley Crest

  • @1ndragunawan
    @1ndragunawan 8 месяцев назад +1

    Certified by Chinese Aviation Authority, which means it's legal to fly only in China.

    • @mountainclimber4511
      @mountainclimber4511 8 месяцев назад

      yeah because each country's CAA has its own requirements, so even the cover China its a big market and then some other countries

    • @wroughtforge7547
      @wroughtforge7547 8 месяцев назад

      They don’t have this technology anywhere else.

    • @DaddyBear205
      @DaddyBear205 8 месяцев назад +1

      The rest of the world will be left behind

    • @1ndragunawan
      @1ndragunawan 8 месяцев назад

      @@DaddyBear205 unlikely, since there are so many startups on Earth making this kind of vehicle.

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      How many of these are already certified?

  • @MorseTammy-z6q
    @MorseTammy-z6q 3 месяца назад

    Cynthia Well

  • @abbeysekamatte8289
    @abbeysekamatte8289 8 месяцев назад +1

    This is an ad ! You guys aren't even shy about this ! CNBC !

    • @donkeykong516
      @donkeykong516 8 месяцев назад

      This is an excellent ad

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@donkeykong516 it's a deceptive ad. It's not possible to carry people for a duration or distance that would matter for travel anywhere.

    • @CNBCi
      @CNBCi  8 месяцев назад +3

      We will always let you know if content is sponsored. We don't upload ads to our channel.

    • @TheBagOfHolding
      @TheBagOfHolding 8 месяцев назад +2

      @@CNBCi how long did you witness it carry a human passanger? How far did it take someone?

    • @petrbecak7092
      @petrbecak7092 7 месяцев назад

      There are plenty of videos with passengers aboard, you're just lazy to find them. Plus this is a certified drone so if they say they can fly 30 km with people inside then I know I can trust it.

  • @OnlyElshafto
    @OnlyElshafto Месяц назад

    Oh..avoiding flocks of seagulls obviously 😂😂😂😂

  • @Ottovonostbahnhof
    @Ottovonostbahnhof 8 месяцев назад

    有商业化前景吗?珠海又要增加一个失败案例

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      None. No range, little payload, certain failure.

  • @KemalDirican-f2o
    @KemalDirican-f2o 4 месяца назад

    Zboncak Crest

  • @alhavana9426
    @alhavana9426 8 месяцев назад +2

    Lemme guess !! 20min of flight time then 6hrs of charge 😂

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      15

    • @herrwolf5184
      @herrwolf5184 8 месяцев назад

      you underestimate battery technology

    • @yukon4511
      @yukon4511 8 месяцев назад

      @@herrwolf5184 Please explain it to me.

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela 8 месяцев назад

      @@yukon4511 Recharging should be 30 minutes or less assuming a powerful enough charger. It doesn't make much sense to charge faster anyway because there's an inspection between landing and taking off.
      How much time it takes for a battery to charge (or safely discharge) doesn't depend on how big it is, but rather on the chemistry and how powerful the charger is. Given the same chemistry and a powerful enough charger, an AAA battery driving a tiny toy car and a container-sized battery driving a large electric cargo ship charge in the same time.

    • @suportm782
      @suportm782 6 месяцев назад

      They just replace the batteries with fresh sets, get it out the door in 15 minutes.

  • @PhilemonCleveland-j5c
    @PhilemonCleveland-j5c 3 месяца назад

    Eddie Forge

  • @mikeliu4261
    @mikeliu4261 8 месяцев назад

    soon this company will be blacklisted by US politicians

  • @sunnyskye213
    @sunnyskye213 7 месяцев назад

    FLY, HIGH WITH A-I BUT ON A-I DO NADA R-E-L-Y.......😮😢