Fun fact - kryptonite was first introduced in a Superman radio serial. The voice actor wanted to take a vacation but the show was produced live. So they came up with the idea for a substance that weakened Superman so a different actor could do the voice. About 6 years later, kryptonite debuted in the comics.
And ever since then people have completely ignored the fact that ANY kryptonite being on planet Earth that wasn't specifically brought there by way of a space ship would be 100% impossible. A planet several star systems away that explodes is NOT going to have any actual debris make it to Earth, and even if by some miracle any of that exploded planet did happen to fly off on exactly the right trajectory, the speed it would be moving at would mean it wouldn't hit the Earth for thousands of years. Long story short; kryptonite is bullshit, and it's always been bullshit.
@@Astraeus.. In some versions, Clark gets to earth from a Wormhole. In others, he was in suspended animation in the travel, so, It can be he was send to earth millions of years before. Also, Krypton Tech can find New Genesis that, by the way, exist outside the universe. Also, Jor-El consider send Kal to other planets. So... yeah, is bullshit, But is comics dude
Here's the cast of this movie: -Less Luthor -Clark Can't -Super-meh -@MarthaFan52 -Bruce Whine -Lois Doesn't-stay-in-her-Lane -Wonder Why -Reverse Flash -Everyone but Fox News
I never noticed Lex crying when he dipped Zod...why the fuck was he crying? Is it because he cut his own hand? Is it because he left the sprinklers on? Is it because he figured out what movie he's in?
It's probably the cut on his hand (he seems to really dislike physical pain, just LOOK how unexpectedly NOT Lex Luthor he is because he's IRONICALLY a wuss!) mixed with his idea of Zod being a Martyr for... For whatever fucking reason, why did he like Zod again? I don't know, this movie is so stupid.
*Superman and Batman are fighting *Steppenwolfe* Superman: I am going to kill him now Steppenwolfe: Tell Martha that I love her.... Batman: Who? Steppenwolfe: Martha, My mother Batman:Did you hear that? Superman: We have to help him
I so hated the fact that they made Metropolis and Gotham like a mile apart from each other. Its like saying, for a man who can travel faster than a speeding bullet and fights crime, he has no interest in traveling a mile to help out a city next door that is known for having way more crime than Metropolis ever did.
My Biggest sin is they revealed him and wonder woman in the goddamn trailer. It would have been an amazing reveal if they didn't already tell everyone the plot of the film in the first few trailers.
we all knew that the movie wouldnt be Batman and Superman fighting thats just common sense but that should have never been shown in the trailer. The trailer should have only consisted of Batman V Superman and tension between the two
Keefe: Martha! Bruce: Why did you say that name?! Keefe: What? Oh thank God, Mr. Wayne, get this metal shit off my legs...! Bruce: Why did you say that name?! Keefe: What name? Jeez, I don't know, a bunch of metal just broke my legs into smitheries so I hope you can forgive me for spewing out some random bullshit. Now if you could just... Bruce: _Why did you say that name?!_ Keefe: Dude, what the fuck are you on?! Get this shit off my fucking legs or I'm suing your ass! Bruce: *Why did you say that name?!* Keefe: Jeez, cough, cough, good thing I'm dying anyway. Bruce: Why did you... oh, you're dead. Damn, I really have to stop doing that...
Actually, Clark prioritized always being able to hear Lois. That's how he knew to show up in the desert. It's shown in Man of Steel he focused on always being able to hear his mother and how he knew Zod was threatening her. Now it should be a sin that he can't focus on two people since he's essentially suppressing the rest of the world.
Then why he didn't "hear" when she was kiddnaped? We Know the lore behind it, is still a plothole. Basically this movie didn't know wtf do with Superman, they dont know how to use him yet.
It's a shame how they wasted this movies potential over a money grab to fight Marvel. They should have designed the story properly and made it true to what most fans expected. Sadly the title was wasted. This could have been extremely good. Hopefully DC learns from this and hires better writers and directors.
Yeah, they keep trying to 'catch up' to Marvel without understanding that Marvel built the trust it currently has from the ground up, and that's after years of hit-or-miss movies with the Marvel name attached to it. DC could easily have done that, there's plenty of talent up for grabs out there, but they're trying to force it.
Exactly. Warner Bros. is trying to be in the same place as Marvel is now without going through the proper set-up, and that's seriously hurting these films.
Yeah well, what do you expect from a writer who said, and I quote, "Batman v Superman is where you go when you admit to yourself that you've exhausted all possibilities". Red flag, anyone?
Amen. But they are good at building hype, and there's a fair few dedicated DC fanboys out there. So I do wonder whether it will bite them in the end or not.
IT HAS A DEEPER MEANING, IT ACTUALLY REPRESENTS HOW BRUCE WAYNE IS AHEAD OF TIME IN EVERYTHING HE DOES, YOU JUST HAVE TO READ INTO IT YOU MARVEL-PAID HATER
Good thing Superman's mother wasn't named something like Philomena or Iphigenia, or he would likely be dead. Then again, it is even more lucky Batman strangely thinks "Martha" is an unusual name. And lucky for both neither refers to their mother as "mom" or "mother", as that would have screwed everything up.
It is odd superman refers to his mother as Martha but the point wasn't solely our moms have the same name, up until this point Batman had seen Superman as just an alien destroying cities and killing thousands, the fact that he has a mother who's about to die is something Batman can relate to.
@@anitabonghit7606 Exactly. People are stupid and jump to conclusions without even thinking. Maybe because marvel movies spit explanation every 30 seconds so you don't even have to think
Props for giving Batman's brief fight scene some credit. Best part of the movie by far. And while adding a sin for Superman not throwing the spear is fair, I thought that should have been Wonder Woman's role. The one thing she has over Superman is no weakness to kryptonite; her taking up the spear would have shown functional teamwork and given her a reason to be there. That missed opportunity is worth at least five sins, I think.
Lois was actually not too far when she was drowning, so that's reasonable. What isn't is that he can hear someone in Africa put a gun to her head while he's in Metropolis but can't hear his mother getting kidnapped.
@@Nancy-yw8ul Batman wears a cowl made of lead so that x ray vision cannot be used to trace his identity. This is shown in the Batman/Superman Apocalypse movie. That's the same reason he uses a voice modulator, so that voice recognition cannot be used to trace his identity.
@@ΦιλήμωνΓαλογαύρος ain't robin dead cause of Joker amd Harley? Also don't say oh that's jason todd, Zack said it's freaking Dick grayson that dead which is Huh 😪
In the trailer it looked epic; in the movie it was pretty damn cringe worthy especially the fact that it was followed by "you will". It sounded pretty nasty TBH.
Rather than Supe flying away, the B vs. S fight should have happened right then and there. Let them settle their differences earlier in the film (like Ironman vs Thor vs Cap scene in Avengers) and then have Lex and Doomsday pop up. The film would have better pacing and the plot would flow more naturally.
9:19 - I actually have a strong thought that that’s actually Barry from Justice League running back in time to warn Bruce about Darkseid, which we might see in Zack Snyder’s Justice League next year. I don’t think it’s a hallucination
"The world has been so caught up with what Superman can do, that no one has asked what he should do." What is she talking about? That was what Man of Steel spent nearly all of its time asking, to the point where it was getting extremely annoying, and to the point where they had PA KENT suggest that he SHOULD have let a bunch of kids drown in a bus. Look, I get that people don't find Superman relatable because of his boy-scout tendencies, but they spend so much time asking "What should he do" that they try to make even choices that have an unquestionable right or wrong answer into something ambiguous. That is the biggest reason I don't like this version of Superman. In an effort to make him relatable by not always having all of the answers, they go too far and make it impossible to relate to him by having him be so confused he can't even recognize the right thing to do even when it's very clear.
Hugh McMonigle It's a fair question for a realistic version of superman. He has the power to change the world but what right does he have. He could sort out North Korea in an hour and make it a much better life for the people in that area but what right does he have to intervene
Asking where he should draw the line is fine. Making the most basic decision of right and wrong (such as whether or not to save a bus full of children) a complicated philosophical debate isn't. "Life isn't that simple" doesn't mean "Everything in life is a complicated and tedious grey area." There are some choices out there with a clear right and wrong answer, and it irritates me that instead of having him go through actual difficult choices where anyone can understand both sides, they try to turn those clear questions into false difficult choices. For example, your North Korea scenario would be a grey area. Loads of people suffer there, but if he just barged in and started fixing things, he could destabilize the situation which could lead to much worse consequences. That would be an understandable dilemma. The ones they keep picking for MoS Superman are not understandable dilemmas because many of them are easy choices to make, and yet they still try to convince you that the obvious wrong choice is a potential right choice.
lol, yeah, understandable. tldr, Black-and-White moral choices exist. Morally ambiguous choices in movies should be ones where people can honestly relate to both options, not forced ones where there is an obvious right or wrong option like whether or not to save a bus full of kids.
That's what pissed me off the most about Man of Steel. They spent the first hour exploring Clark's character. They keep setting up the idea that Clark WANTS to help people, but he doesn't because his dad told him not to and that's why he's conflicted. Then the second half of the movie takes those ideas, throws them in the dumpster and says, "f*ck it, I guess we're fighting now."
the biggest problem is Clark Kent a reporter doesn't know who Bruce Wayne is. Batman, a detective, doesn't know who Superman is. That should've been figured out within the first 20 minutes of the movie.
Its called plot convenience...its there in marvel movies too....oh wait , ur a marvel Fanboy! So what, just bcuz he's a reporter doesn't.mean he has to know everyyyyyyy thingggggg!! Although he did know who batman was....I don't think u have seen the movie
Geeze that point gets me every time I see him and his wife die. Just give the guy everything...Thomas you are a billionaire....who cares about a thousand dollars and jewelry? No material possessions are worth someone's life.
Honestly i'd remove a sin for Ben Affleck's performance. He was a surprisingly good Batman, which i bet hardly anyone expected. The rest I mostly agree with
Why do people hate on Ben Affleck, he is an amazing actor, they all judge him off of Daredevil, that movie doesn't reflect on him as an actor at all, that movie was shit because of the writers!
+M10_CR7 and they sadly wasted their talents in shit movies,but hopefully when Ben Affleck directs his own Batman movie, they can make it work and put DC back on track,assuming Justice League sucks,which it probably will thanks to the man hack snyder, wonder woman could be great but I don't think it's enough to fix this cinematic universe
I always hated how no one explained how the bat cave was made. Only exception is Christopher Nolan's version because Fox's basement level with his inventions was pushed away then used by Bruce but he still had an actual cave so who knows.
Why do we need to know, hes a batman who has been batman for 20 years, hes obviously built the batcave and upgraded it along the way. Unless people just wanted it to be another batman origin story
I agree. In the TV show Barry can run faster then time like in season 1 when he ran back to the night his mom gets killed. And Batman didn't know who Superman was and Lois Lane was just a regular reporter to him, and Batman hasn't even met the Flash
That cinemasins remark is dumb. Obviously he means that even if there is just 1% chance of him being hostile, that is serious enough to necessitate the attempt to kill Superman. Not that I necessarily agree with it, but it is not illogical or anything.
@@Riwillion No Cinema Sins is absolutely right. 1% chance means that is more likely to NOT be true than it is to be true. I mean if you think about EVERYTHING has some chance of happening however tiny. There is a tiny chance you COULD win the lotto, so does that mean you will win the lotto with absolute certainty and therefore should rely on winning the lotto? Let's say in the 1970s that the US believed that there was a 1% chance that Russia would launch all its nukes at the US within the next hour (for instance during the Cuban missile crisis). Should the US therefore launch all its own missiles at Russia because clearly a 1% chance is an absolute certainty? Logic is based on taking in the evidence and considering the consequences. If the US launches all its missiles at Russia then there is guaranteed certainty that Russia will launch all its nuclear missiles at the US but a 1% chance that Russia will launch its missiles means that Russia probably won't. So you are choosing between guaranteed annihilation and a 1% chance at annihilation. According to Batman's logic you have to choose the guaranteed annihilation everytime. Batman treating something which is more likely to be false as if it should be guaranteed as being true is therefore illogical, irresponsible and evil given the implications of that decision. According to Batman we should never investigate any crime to make sure that an allegation isn't false. We should never avoid using military force, never diversify our portfolios, never should have gone to the moon, never should even risk getting out of bed because that tiny percent chance that something could go wrong GUARANTEES that it should be treated as absolutely going wrong.
GeorgeMonet a hostile Superman could spell the end for humanity. From Batman’s perspective in this scene, it’s uncertain what Supes’ intentions are. If further information demonstrates that there is indeed a small chance of Superman being hostile, Batman should treat it as a certainty. 4 scenarios: A. Supes is not a threat, but Batman treats him as a foe, even though it’s still uncertain. Best case is Superman convinces Bats that he’s not a villain. Undesirable outcomes: Superman kills Batman and Batman is dead, or Batman kills Superman and may have to live with that for the rest of his life if he later finds out Supes was not maleficent. B. Supes actually is hostile and Batman acts preemptively - this is the best chance at saving humanity. C. Supes is not hostile and Batman chooses to do nothing - Batman likely has less intel than he would if he acted more aggressively, but the world is safe. D. Supes is hostile and Batman does nothing: gg Earth. 1% is not minuscule, comparing the odds of winning the lotto to a 1% chance of humanity perishing was absurd. You can still argue that equating a 1% chance to acting as if it were undoubtedly true to be unwarranted, but I understand Batman’s sentiment of not wanting to run the small risk of extinction. And Batman never said anything about getting out of bed or going to the moon or military strategy, and it was inappropriate to extrapolate that dialogue to those ideas.
@@gideon6459 you're most probably americans/british, and no really there's still people complaining about being corrected when they say "was" instead of "were" and they say "your" instead of "you're" and viceversa like It's something hard to get, people get annoyed by this? at least feel lucky you don't speak Spanish or French or even worse Italian that has more rules than english
@wolfaesthetic Oooh... You shouldn't have said that! 😄 I'm French Canadian and a perfect bilingual, and I have friends who are Anglophones that had a very, VERY hard time with French rules. I have never, despite my notorious asshatery, EVER called them illiterates for a pointless typo or made fun of them for literally screwing nearly every gendered nouns that are infamously hard to memorize! So I tip my hat to the biggest asshole of the comment section and today I designate you as the winner! Here's your 🏆!
At 9:30 Bruce states that" If we believe that there is even a 1% chance that he is our enemy then we have to take it as an absolute certainty." to which you responded, "Math is not one of Bruce's strong suits." Actually, he is correct. If an outcome has a possibility of occurring over an interval (years, months, weeks, days, hours) then the likelihood of that outcome increases over time. Imagine tossing a ball back and forth to a friend, if the outcome of one of you not catching (dropping the ball) exists as a 1% likelihood, over time that likelihood increases, and with sufficient time becomes inevitable.
No, actually it remains 1% the entire time. You just committed what is known as the Gambler's Fallacy. If the chance is 1% it is 1% every time, all the time, never any greater. Each toss is independent and has the same percentage. At 100 tosses, still 1%. That is what 1% probability means.
@@MyMagnificentOctopus The Gambler's Fallacy applies to non-sentient objects (dice, cards) where the variables are relatively constant, and the outcome is not informed by history because the mechanisms are not conscious. However, it's a poor metaphor for how humans (or a superhuman) would respond to an infinite variety of inputs over time. For example, while powerful, Superman can experience fatigue, both mental and physical, as well as anguish, regret, sadness, etc., and he could conceivably explore alternate paths toward his objective of world peace when met with repeated failure. Simply put, throughout a lifetime, sentient beings don't make the same decisions under the same circumstances at all times, and our choices are informed by past experience, as opposed to a roll of dice where there are a prescribed set of possible outcomes (which is where you're getting your constant).
@@AntoineDennison On the other hand, assigning any fixed probability of a sentient being doing something is also rather absurd, given what you just said, so the whole probability part is kind of pointless. (Also, wasn't the point it was a 1% chance he might EVER go rogue, so it really wasn't a day to day one, making it irrelevant how much time passed.)
@@MyMagnificentOctopus There was no fixed probability. There was only a minimal (arbitrary) threshold of 1%. But the point was intended to suggest the likelihood wasn't 0. Second, because the probability wasn't 0, that means that with time and experience as factors, there is an increased likelihood of a negative outcome. It's not a fixed set of probable, independent results like a roll of the dice (Gamblers Fallacy). You're right about the time the day-to-day time interval. It could be second-to-second or whatever time frame a superbeing would use to evaluate and assess the objectives of their efforts relative to the reality on the ground. Also, we don't have an infinite time horizon, only the lifetime of the superbeing in question and the lifetime of the human species. The last assumption would be that the superbeing wouldn't operate within a behavioral loop, correcting each successive failure.
Yeah, what's up with that? The only other time I remember him using a gun was in the pilot for, _Batman Beyond_, and he looked and it and realized 'I'm too old for this &%$#.'
+Ben N (BNuts) batman shoots a chick in the dark knight comic, also, Keaton killed plenty of people...and Bale used guns & missiles too... also killed people
The problem with this movie is its trying to catch up with the MCU and making cross over movies before firmy establishing everyone. We had a bunch of movies establishing characters before we got The Avengers. Here all we have is the Man of Steel and staright to this. This tried to be a climactic showdown with characters we just met
When Doomsday looks at the Superman statue in anger. I was going crazy. You can still see the zod in him that’s mad at Superman for dooming their race.
Actually Batman is more a rip off of various characters Zorro 1919 rich playboy with weapons hidden in a cave and wore a dark blue suit with mask. The Bat a 1926 serial film character that had climbing rope, Bat signal, black automobile, Bat face mask which is actually more similar to The Cat's mask which appeared in Batman #1 and had a Cat face mask. She was later called Cat woman and abandoned the cat face mask for different masks. The Shadow first appeared on Radio in 1930 which is 4 years after the Bat. He also copies Black Bat a pulp magazine character from 1933 which wore gloves with those funny looking wing things sticking out and a similar mask. Also copies the Phantom 1936 with shorts over pants and white eyes in his mask, and has tracking dog. Batman's tracking dog was called ace and the bathound. The Bat serial film was remade and released as Bat Whisperer in 1933 and Bob Kane admitted he saw the film. The makers of the film sued Bob Kane. Bob Kane paid for losing the suit, an bought the film rights to The Bat.
Take out the desert scene, the courtroom, actually scrap the whole thing: Have lex come up with a plan to destroy half the planet, have batman want to kill him but superman saves his life, then have lex do something so dirty to batman that he blames superman for not letting him kill him in the first place. Replace all that courtroom mumble jumble with some of clark & lois together so we actually care about that relationship. Have wonder woman break up the fight at the end because she can. And save the villain and his death for another movie
Endowing Superman with even a modicum of the super-intelligence he is supposed to possess would be a good start; at least he could get involved rather than just mope about letting everyone he encounters fuck with him without his realising or even attempting to fight his own corner.
Can’t argue there. Just upgraded my phone and they switched me from Sprint to T-Mobile. It averages only 2-3 bars of signal...even though the phone has 5G support...
While in the theater seeing this I asked my friend who's a Super-Man fan (I personally don't like the character as he's WAY to OP), "Who are they burying?" -this was the funeral scene for Super-Man "Super-Man" was his answer "Who are the Kent's burying?" "Clark Kent obviously" "How?? They're the same person." "Oh yeah.... I don't know." /smh
If the Military were informed of Superman's identity, I can see that being done out of respect. Honestly however, I suspect Batman swapped Superman's body with an innocent civilian so the Clark's could have their son.
Now that I've watched Man of Steel my biggest complaint is that this, this is the direct sequel! I did not love Man of Steel but in retrospect, it was way more enjoyable than Batman V Superman!
If movies make audiences confused especially in this kind of important moment then they should really check it again cuz it’s just a disappointing scene
Exactly - his mannerisms, the way he held those photos of Matha (like Joker held his cards), the overcomplicated plan and riddiculous kitchen timer. Very Joker-style.
I say Snyder was trying to make the next Heath Ledger Joker in a movie he convinced himself was “epic” but had no idea what made him such a good villain to begin with
Also also, as someone that has passed through some... dark experiences, I can honestly tell there are some things that can trigger a panic attack, Bruce is still human and his parents have been used against him before
Remember when he was first cast and people compared him to Heath Ledger breaking expectations with The Joker? Yeah, that's not always going to be the case people...
15:34 that's the point. It wasn't about showing us that his mom's name was martha but that his father cared for someone else's life while losing his own. That's exactly what Superman does... With his dying breath, he literally calls out for someone else who will die by letting this happen. Too bad I'm way late on this video
@Divvay Khatri you make an interesting point and I think that your idea finally explains why the film focused this much on this Martha thing, you are actually the only person I know of who has been able to do that. The problem however, is that if Superman had said any other name but Martha, Batman would have killed him without hesitation, which he was actually going to do if Lois didn’t arrive just in time to tell him that Martha is the name of Superman’s mother.
Divvay Khatri it’s not even that...superman could be like save my mother...matha..that would makes sense...just saying Martha...is bullshit way to bring back batman from rage and I understand what you said but sorry the execution was lousy
The biggest sin in this movie was letting superman hold a kryptonite spear to kill the monster instead of letting someone who is not invulnerable to kryptonite
maybe when batman leads the zod-luthor monster thing to the city so he can somehow retrieve the spear while fighting an unkillable monster instead of GETTING THE SPEAR FIRST
Just admit the entire movie was wrong. He put too much into the movie that didnt belong for the love of competition with Marvel and his focus was too much on Batman
Every time I see Eisenberg’s Luther, I am reminded of all the things Kevin Smith said about his experiences with Prince, down to Prince having his own basketball court and being an excellent player.
17:55: I hate to be that guy, but Wonder Woman's bracelets can deflect any projectile. I've heard she's even used them to deflect a planet destroying blast launched by the Gods.
Tsuruya San No. She has superman for that. He is her _"weapon that kills anything."_ ~Apparently~ In some comic stories, Superman loves Wonder Woman instead of Lois Lane. Gweugh \ᇂ_ᇂ\
There's so much unnecessary BS in this movie. Take out all the dream sequence crap, Justice League set up, Wonder Woman, and Doomsday. Make Lex completely different and focus the film on simply what is in the title: Batman V Superman.
Exactly. I spent the last forty minutes just sighing and asking when it was going to end because it was just too much. They tried to put too much into what could have been a great movie.
+Hayley Weasley I thought I was the only one. I could feel my head start to throb because of the complete absurdity of it all towards the last couple of minutes in the movie.
14:00 Superman has X-Ray vision and heard Bruce's radio communications earlier in the movie, so thats how Clark knew Bruce's identity, as for Bruce knowing Clark's identity, he's the World's Greatest Detective
What? Bruce didn't know Clark's identity, and even if he did, you can't chalk it up to, "Batman is the world's greatest detective, duh" because that's simply bad story-telling. Relying on that fact to make you believe in those logical gaps in the story doesn't allow for a coherent and believable plot. By the way, Batman got duped pretty hard in this film anyway, so he was in no way a good detective in this film. Everything he finds out about Superman and by extension, virtually everything he does in this film, aside from within the third act, was all deliberately planned by Luthor; batman just fell right into his trap the whole way through.
Stop fucking saying "They should've judged by the ultimate edition". NO. The studio decided to cut those parts out of the movie for some reason. The original, full movie, as it came out in theaters, when you went to see it and payed money for it, wasn't the ultimate edition. You shouldn't have to pay extra money just to add material to the movie in order for it to make sense.
They removed those scenes because people nowadays can't sit through movies longer than 2 hours and 30 minutes and theaters wouldn't be able to have more showings
The "original, full movie" is the Ultimate Edition in this case, precisely because theater chain owners demand shorter runtimes for big blockbuster films to maximize showings and profits. The studios follow suit as it benefits their profits as well. Batman v Superman was a case of the original cut being trimmed and haphazardly edited, not a case of the final cut as decided by the filmmaker throwing in more scenes as a home video bonus.
+Wade Wilson The funny thing is that WB owns those properties lmao and they let the directors do it more than 2 hrs and 30 mins so why couldn't they do it for BvS? The world may never know.
Actually, like with Gotham and Metropolis, they made up Nairomi. Since it's just fiction, they could have made it a country in Africa; it doesn't have to be a city/county/whatever.
The sin at 2:45, how the kryptonian ship crashed in the Indian Ocean. That was the world engine from the first Superman movie, the one he destroys to stop the terraforming of earth.
Does RUclips have cinema sin's sins? All these disconnected comments in all these videos would get more views then the original depending on the movie being reviewed.
I remember I was watching this with my mom, brother, and grandma and they was all on superman's side because he was defenseless in the fight even though he really wasn't because he could've killed batman in the first 10 seconds of the fight
Introducing Doomsday in only the _second_ film in the DCEU is _way_ too early and should've been done further down the road for the films. Also, the villain should've been Metallo. Lex Luthor wants Superman dead because he's "too powerful", so when Batman fails to kill him, he creates Doomsday, who's like five times stronger than Superman. That makes no sense. Wouldn't it have made more sense if Luthor relied more on a human in a weaponized suit instead of making something even more powerful than Superman? The guy in the wheelchair-- hates Superman with a flaming passion, goes so far to team up with Lex Luthor to take him down? He'd become Metallo. Metallo would go mad with power, thus forcing Superman and Batman (and WW of course) to form an alliance of convenience, but this movie insists on going all the way just for the sake of cramming so much stuff, so it would catch up with Marvel.
Joshua Galloway so better than Wakanda because it makes sense in the universe (where cities like Metropolis and Gotham exist) and doesn’t defy all understanding. Why isn’t Wakanda well known to everyone? Either they’ve been killing/imprisoning everyone who stumbled upon it over the entire course of human history, or it’s magic. It’s in an African desert, not a rainforest, and it’s far to technologically advanced to be sufficiently independent from needing imports to not be a well known place.
retsaM innavoiG that’s a whole lot of “it’s vibranium okay!” For me, but honestly I don’t care about the impossibilities of a material like vibranium (like how it’s perfect for electronics AND weaponry AND armor and more which all requires different levels of ductilibility, conductivity, and malleability The point is that Wakanda makes as much sense as if South Korea suddenly ceased exporting computer technology in favor of returning to an agricultural feudal society Not to mention the difficulties in achieving anything technologically advanced when tribal-esque society is the only existing society. Innovation requires variation and tribal societies subsist on unity and zealotry. Actually, that’s not entirely true, unified and zealot societies can achieve a great deal in terms of technological advancements, most notably the Nazis during WWII. Wakanda makes as much sense as a kid getting bit by a spider and developing super reflexes and sticky fingers
Sneeman98 It's a curious aspect to be sure, but that's not why DC gets a sin. Jeremy gives DC a sin for simply being DC. DC doesn't have a good track record with movies
@@Madman-ym8dh DC's biggest mistake is superman. Stupidly overpowered character who should never have been made so op. If he can lift infinity itself how is it even feasable for batman to be able to fight him? Or anyone for that matter. Crime should come to a stop just because he exists. Its really stupid how op he is.
@@TheMegaultrachicken I mean.. as I've started reading the comics... superman while insanely powerful... has had people who can stand up toe to toe with him and he also has a ridiculous weak affinity to magic. Sad we've yet to see any of that though.
@@TheMegaultrachicken I'm not a DC fan, but you do know that that doesn't apply to every version of him, right? He can't lift infinitely. He's incredibly strong, but his strength still has limits.
Wouldn't the Batman brand be bragging rights in prison? In this universe, Batman is a savage killer. Wouldn't the Bat-brand establish you as a badass because you survived an encounter with the bat?
The Flash part wasn’t because Bruce was having a vision. The Flash can time travel and that was my first thought when I saw that scene. I figure they might explain it in the Flash movie
Man, this has been a big year of "firsts" for me. First movie I've ever seen on opening night (Spectre), first movie I've seen twice in theaters (Star Wars: The Force Awakens), first video game I've every pre-ordered (No Man's Sky), and first movie I've ever decided to walk out on in theaters (Batman v. Superman)! I'm on a roll!
Luke Dias I actually went on the Thursday night preview for that as well! It was a later showing, but it was still pretty cool to see people in Star Wars costumes at the theater!
3:10 I dunno, maybe he's got super hearing or something 4:00 Superman destroyed a city on his first public appearance, why would Bruce be interested in him before that? 5:20 Yes, it's a kryptonite scalpel. And? 6:05 No, the bucket of piss is Luthor's real reason for wanting to import kryptonite, rather than the PR spin he's giving the authorities 9:25 Or...the Flash is sending a message into the past? 10:38 The answer is "Because they knew he'd come if Lois was in danger" How did you not get that? Even when Luthor pulls the exact same trick next time he wants to summon Superman? 12:57 What, Superman kills now? Fly him to prison maybe, but "obliterate him"? 14:04 Yes. He overheard Bruce's radio communication. You commented on it. 15:33 Martha's a common name? How many Marthas do you know who aren't the mother of Batman or Superman and were created in the first half of the last century? 19:40 Or it's the film's 20th dream sequence?
Fun fact - kryptonite was first introduced in a Superman radio serial. The voice actor wanted to take a vacation but the show was produced live. So they came up with the idea for a substance that weakened Superman so a different actor could do the voice. About 6 years later, kryptonite debuted in the comics.
😮
I remember those radio shows! One had Superman fighting the KKK ("The Clan of the Fiery Cross" but w/e)
And ever since then people have completely ignored the fact that ANY kryptonite being on planet Earth that wasn't specifically brought there by way of a space ship would be 100% impossible. A planet several star systems away that explodes is NOT going to have any actual debris make it to Earth, and even if by some miracle any of that exploded planet did happen to fly off on exactly the right trajectory, the speed it would be moving at would mean it wouldn't hit the Earth for thousands of years.
Long story short; kryptonite is bullshit, and it's always been bullshit.
Who
The
Fuck
CARES?!
@@Astraeus.. In some versions, Clark gets to earth from a Wormhole.
In others, he was in suspended animation in the travel, so, It can be he was send to earth millions of years before.
Also, Krypton Tech can find New Genesis that, by the way, exist outside the universe. Also, Jor-El consider send Kal to other planets.
So... yeah, is bullshit, But is comics dude
Here's the cast of this movie:
-Less Luthor
-Clark Can't
-Super-meh
-@MarthaFan52
-Bruce Whine
-Lois Doesn't-stay-in-her-Lane
-Wonder Why
-Reverse Flash
-Everyone but Fox News
dont forget bruce case
***** You can try...I can't guarantee you'll keep your hand.
Damian Wayne™ and you forgot bruce banner
Littlebigwatcha Insane Wayne? That's my take on it, lol
Damian Wayne™ well that works too. and kratos?
I never noticed Lex crying when he dipped Zod...why the fuck was he crying? Is it because he cut his own hand? Is it because he left the sprinklers on? Is it because he figured out what movie he's in?
He's crying because his mom is also named Martha.
It's cause he cut his hand.
He's a little bitch.
It's probably the cut on his hand (he seems to really dislike physical pain, just LOOK how unexpectedly NOT Lex Luthor he is because he's IRONICALLY a wuss!) mixed with his idea of Zod being a Martyr for... For whatever fucking reason, why did he like Zod again? I don't know, this movie is so stupid.
I think it's something about him revering Zod and yet hating him.
and you would be perfect at CinemaSins
*Superman and Batman are fighting *Steppenwolfe*
Superman: I am going to kill him now
Steppenwolfe: Tell Martha that I love her....
Batman: Who?
Steppenwolfe: Martha, My mother
Batman:Did you hear that?
Superman: We have to help him
I makes so much sense now
You are not very smart at analysing narrative driven movies, are you?
@@ronnykazadi352 This is a joke comment
@@ahanaspicks5971 this is how 95% of the audience and reviews actually interpret the movie.
lol
I so hated the fact that they made Metropolis and Gotham like a mile apart from each other. Its like saying, for a man who can travel faster than a speeding bullet and fights crime, he has no interest in traveling a mile to help out a city next door that is known for having way more crime than Metropolis ever did.
Well actually that is part of the lore...
+CJ Phoenix I would assume Gotham has a storm over it and is always dark, while metroplis gets the sun that pokes through the clouds lol
I was so confused by that. I had no idea in which city anything took place. For a while I had no idea there even were two cities.
Metropolis and Gotham are sister city's meaning there kinda close.
Sister cities has nothing to do with distance. Here in minnesota we have sister cities that are paired with Swedish cities.
My biggest sin: How the hell does dead Zod + Lex's blood = Doomsday???
But the SCIENCE! behind it is what I wanna know. Even comic science would work.
My Biggest sin is they revealed him and wonder woman in the goddamn trailer. It would have been an amazing reveal if they didn't already tell everyone the plot of the film in the first few trailers.
Ah that's true... at least keep Doomsday a secret, WW would still be a little obvious.
we all knew that the movie wouldnt be Batman and Superman fighting thats just common sense but that should have never been shown in the trailer. The trailer should have only consisted of Batman V Superman and tension between the two
He used zods body to replicate the original doomsday in the ultimate edition, he used his blood to corrupt zods dna
Wayne Enterprise Employee: Martha!
Bruce: Why did you say that name?!
Employee: It's my cat's name.
Bruce:... how would you like a promotion?
ECL28E this comment is so underrated.
cody guerrero ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
ECL28E I
Keefe: Martha!
Bruce: Why did you say that name?!
Keefe: What? Oh thank God, Mr. Wayne, get this metal shit off my legs...!
Bruce: Why did you say that name?!
Keefe: What name? Jeez, I don't know, a bunch of metal just broke my legs into smitheries so I hope you can forgive me for spewing out some random bullshit. Now if you could just...
Bruce: _Why did you say that name?!_
Keefe: Dude, what the fuck are you on?! Get this shit off my fucking legs or I'm suing your ass!
Bruce: *Why did you say that name?!*
Keefe: Jeez, cough, cough, good thing I'm dying anyway.
Bruce: Why did you... oh, you're dead. Damn, I really have to stop doing that...
Joey: "Hey, Barry did you hear about Martha Stewart's deal with Sears?"
Bruce (Offscreen): "Why did you say that name!?"
"Every act is a political act"
"Even twerking?"
😂😂
19 people would disagree
I mean atp it is cause of people getting their but hurt by it
ESPECIALLY twerking
There’s a Black democrat twerking upside down in a campaign ad. 👍🏾
This joke didnt age well
Woman :"Is it stealing if you steal from another thief?"
Cinemasins: Yes.
I'M DYING
"How did the senator not notice a jar full of pee sitting at her desk?"
She's a senator? Duh
Was it helping her get reelected? If not, that's why.
Fuck this movie.
because the label clearly indicated that it was peach tea...and since the hand writing was so nice that's what it had to be
killbotone plot convenience also
they should have done a sin count for every one of Eisenberg's stutters and twitches
rofl I wish they would've.
the score would have been over 9000
***** thanks was waiting for that
That would break down the sin counter.
they couldnt, the number would be too high
Gotham has a thunderstorm, a mile away can be perfectly clear. Not a sin, just how weather works
Yeah, many of these sins are actually just for fun, tho this movie did have many legit ones
Yea he gave a sin for Alfred using the syllable training thing. And bc Bruce dropped his weights. He gives some dumb sins but.
Doesn’t hide the fact that this movie still sucks
@@smoorbb are you okay?
@@smoorbb Writing a comment while experiencing a stroke. **ding**
Eisenberg would have been a much better riddler
Or even arcade from marvel comics
Oh yeah true he would be the Batman forever lex luthor
shit dude, that is so incredibly right. why the hell did NOBODY else think of this???
Coulda been a mediocre joker, better than Jared Leto I think. Would been really good if they gave him a bunch of caffeine XD
Eddiward Johnsiones he would be good at that
The absolute frustration growing in your voice as the vid went on deserves a standing ovation lmao
Yeah it was clear he really doesn't like this movie lol
When Bruce hugged the little girl, I was expecting Jeremy to say "Bruce doesn't turn this kid into Batgirl."
If it were the MCU they'd claim that this girl was batgirl half a decade from now
@@chrisallen9296 Well this is DC so her name was probably Martha.
@@MogtheMad0422 Bucky is alive
@@chrisallen9296 WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME!!!!!
@@MogtheMad0422 Because a dance off wouldn't have saved the world in this movie
Actually, Clark prioritized always being able to hear Lois. That's how he knew to show up in the desert. It's shown in Man of Steel he focused on always being able to hear his mother and how he knew Zod was threatening her. Now it should be a sin that he can't focus on two people since he's essentially suppressing the rest of the world.
That still doesn't explain why he didn't hear her kidnapping in the first place, though.
Then why he didn't "hear" when she was kiddnaped? We Know the lore behind it, is still a plothole. Basically this movie didn't know wtf do with Superman, they dont know how to use him yet.
I invite everyone to read the holy Quran
@@mingfanzhang6153 Ok...
What does that have to do with anything?
It's a shame how they wasted this movies potential over a money grab to fight Marvel. They should have designed the story properly and made it true to what most fans expected. Sadly the title was wasted. This could have been extremely good. Hopefully DC learns from this and hires better writers and directors.
Yeah, they keep trying to 'catch up' to Marvel without understanding that Marvel built the trust it currently has from the ground up, and that's after years of hit-or-miss movies with the Marvel name attached to it. DC could easily have done that, there's plenty of talent up for grabs out there, but they're trying to force it.
Sheo Dagana exactly.
Exactly. Warner Bros. is trying to be in the same place as Marvel is now without going through the proper set-up, and that's seriously hurting these films.
Yeah well, what do you expect from a writer who said, and I quote, "Batman v Superman is where you go when you admit to yourself that you've exhausted all possibilities". Red flag, anyone?
Amen. But they are good at building hype, and there's a fair few dedicated DC fanboys out there. So I do wonder whether it will bite them in the end or not.
3:41 - Captions: "..How do you build this luxurious 'Bat-chelor' pad..."
-.- ... *Ding*
I loved that hahah
The jeep that Bruce Wayne is driving was made in 2016 but the battle of Metropolis was set in 2013, wtf?!
and they shooting this movie in 2014
IT HAS A DEEPER MEANING, IT ACTUALLY REPRESENTS HOW BRUCE WAYNE IS AHEAD OF TIME IN EVERYTHING HE DOES, YOU JUST HAVE TO READ INTO IT YOU MARVEL-PAID HATER
Or then Man of Steel is set in 2016, and Dawn of Justice / Justice League are set in 2017.
DirtyMack Having a car from 3 years in the future does not represent how far ahead in time you are, it represents bad continuity
Where does it say when they take place? I'm legit interested.
Good thing Superman's mother wasn't named something like Philomena or Iphigenia, or he would likely be dead. Then again, it is even more lucky Batman strangely thinks "Martha" is an unusual name. And lucky for both neither refers to their mother as "mom" or "mother", as that would have screwed everything up.
It is odd superman refers to his mother as Martha but the point wasn't solely our moms have the same name, up until this point Batman had seen Superman as just an alien destroying cities and killing thousands, the fact that he has a mother who's about to die is something Batman can relate to.
@Blue Skeptic I guess bro
You’re a moron.
HER NAME IS JOKER
*BATMAN KILLS BRUTALLY* 😂
@@anitabonghit7606 Exactly. People are stupid and jump to conclusions without even thinking. Maybe because marvel movies spit explanation every 30 seconds so you don't even have to think
"on this earth, every act is a political act"
"even twerking?"
Yes, god help us.
In Germany leftists do twerk against Nazis ("Twerking against right wing"). No joke. And yeah, nobody gets it!
@@BabaBangz fuckwit
"Every act is political".
I lost it at that point😂😂😂
Well Cardi is getting endorsements from presidential candidates soooooooo
everything wrong with batman v superman: dawn of justice in 3 words
"they filmed it"
Zack Snyder
well wonder womans bracelets have never broken in the comics so that's like the only true thing
..... hmmm.... true but they are the wrong color and stuff : p
+Billy Berigman If colors are important... marvel really fucked up with hulk's shorts... XD
No no no. These 3 words are better: "it was made"
Less than 200 sins? This should have been the first movie to hit over 1,000,000 sins.
Nope Justin Bieber movie was a million sins.
Hated this movie!!
+elian barnes Bet you're hanging around with all the other cool bandwagon kids now eh.
many movies have already hit that mark pal
Actually, it was over 13 billion.
Props for giving Batman's brief fight scene some credit. Best part of the movie by far. And while adding a sin for Superman not throwing the spear is fair, I thought that should have been Wonder Woman's role. The one thing she has over Superman is no weakness to kryptonite; her taking up the spear would have shown functional teamwork and given her a reason to be there. That missed opportunity is worth at least five sins, I think.
Wonder Woman was busy with the lasso, so it's not a sin.
it was sad superman can hear lois lane from halfway across the city and under water yet he couldn't hear his mom when lex has her hostage
Lois was actually not too far when she was drowning, so that's reasonable.
What isn't is that he can hear someone in Africa put a gun to her head while he's in Metropolis but can't hear his mother getting kidnapped.
Bluemew1234 exactly which is more sad, .. ahh the power of pussy. lol
"If you fly away, she dies". Watch the movie dude.
And how would Lex know he flew away to find his mother?
Exactly
This movie's target audience was cinema sins.
What? (2)
lmaoo
Ahron T Verschleisser lmaoo (2)
@UncleMikeNJ your boner for Superman is blocking your view of logic.
@UncleMikeNJ False, man. It's happened in the comics, he even has a protocol for it.
OR, Superman probably knew Batman's secret identity because he can see through things.
i was hoping someone would point that out 😂
And batman's batman?
@@Nancy-yw8ul Batman wears a cowl made of lead so that x ray vision cannot be used to trace his identity. This is shown in the Batman/Superman Apocalypse movie. That's the same reason he uses a voice modulator, so that voice recognition cannot be used to trace his identity.
Rahman Mhate LINED with lead. LINED.
Also, if you’re talking about the Darkseid planet, it’s spelled “Apokolips”.
@@thefilmwatcher1302 I think he meant the movie named apocalypse.
4:10 "...an accused child predator, later was assaulted in prison..." If he was 'accused' rather than convicted, then why was he in prison?
"" Many believe that the mark of Batman essentially is a Death Sentence ".
@@ΦιλήμωνΓαλογαύρος he kills child predators and level one henchmen but not Joker......
@@ΦιλήμωνΓαλογαύρος ain't robin dead cause of Joker amd Harley? Also don't say oh that's jason todd, Zack said it's freaking Dick grayson that dead which is Huh 😪
that would be the U.S. justice system at work.
@@RoninTheLightSkin because Snyder is a fu*ker.i would've loved to see nightwing in dceu.
20 sins in 5 minutes of the film
This is going to be good
Chefies Bass Boosts 45 sins
Jackie Capavanni not the video, the actuall movieeee
In total this movie deserved a lot more
Michael Freed sorry to disappoint, but it didn’t. It should have though.
Movie isnt that bad. People just wanted the movie not to do well.
"I miss you son"
"No you don't, you're dead"
GG
Nothing to do with either of those...
PSA: Good Game
i thougt gg meant get good
It means "good game", but is always sarcasm.
+Dan Nolan No it's not. Most of the time when a player says "gg", everyone else says it too, on both teams. It's just good game, not sarcasm.
Should've taken off a sin for when Batman asked Superman "Do you bleed?" That line was awesome!
"do you bleed?" - "no." Oh well nvm then.
In the trailer it looked epic; in the movie it was pretty damn cringe worthy especially the fact that it was followed by "you will". It sounded pretty nasty TBH.
no it wasnt
I hated that line. Superman flies off and Batman looks like a little kid saying, "No, you're a butthead."
Rather than Supe flying away, the B vs. S fight should have happened right then and there. Let them settle their differences earlier in the film (like Ironman vs Thor vs Cap scene in Avengers) and then have Lex and Doomsday pop up. The film would have better pacing and the plot would flow more naturally.
9:19 - I actually have a strong thought that that’s actually Barry from Justice League running back in time to warn Bruce about Darkseid, which we might see in Zack Snyder’s Justice League next year. I don’t think it’s a hallucination
It's definitely not a hallucination because we saw papers flying around when Bruce woke up for real.
1 year later and you were right 🔥
But why would it be flashpoint batman. Not even the right person.
I'm referring to the Batman carrying guns that's called Flashpoint Batman and that's Thomas Wayne
SO THEY CAN DO DOOMSAY MADE FROM HUMAN DNA BUT NOT DARKSIDE?? WHY
"The world has been so caught up with what Superman can do, that no one has asked what he should do."
What is she talking about? That was what Man of Steel spent nearly all of its time asking, to the point where it was getting extremely annoying, and to the point where they had PA KENT suggest that he SHOULD have let a bunch of kids drown in a bus.
Look, I get that people don't find Superman relatable because of his boy-scout tendencies, but they spend so much time asking "What should he do" that they try to make even choices that have an unquestionable right or wrong answer into something ambiguous. That is the biggest reason I don't like this version of Superman. In an effort to make him relatable by not always having all of the answers, they go too far and make it impossible to relate to him by having him be so confused he can't even recognize the right thing to do even when it's very clear.
Hugh McMonigle
It's a fair question for a realistic version of superman.
He has the power to change the world but what right does he have.
He could sort out North Korea in an hour and make it a much better life for the people in that area but what right does he have to intervene
Asking where he should draw the line is fine. Making the most basic decision of right and wrong (such as whether or not to save a bus full of children) a complicated philosophical debate isn't. "Life isn't that simple" doesn't mean "Everything in life is a complicated and tedious grey area." There are some choices out there with a clear right and wrong answer, and it irritates me that instead of having him go through actual difficult choices where anyone can understand both sides, they try to turn those clear questions into false difficult choices.
For example, your North Korea scenario would be a grey area. Loads of people suffer there, but if he just barged in and started fixing things, he could destabilize the situation which could lead to much worse consequences. That would be an understandable dilemma. The ones they keep picking for MoS Superman are not understandable dilemmas because many of them are easy choices to make, and yet they still try to convince you that the obvious wrong choice is a potential right choice.
I was about to read that, but then I pressed read more and changed my mind
lol, yeah, understandable. tldr, Black-and-White moral choices exist. Morally ambiguous choices in movies should be ones where people can honestly relate to both options, not forced ones where there is an obvious right or wrong option like whether or not to save a bus full of kids.
That's what pissed me off the most about Man of Steel. They spent the first hour exploring Clark's character. They keep setting up the idea that Clark WANTS to help people, but he doesn't because his dad told him not to and that's why he's conflicted. Then the second half of the movie takes those ideas, throws them in the dumpster and says, "f*ck it, I guess we're fighting now."
Dad:"I miss you son"
Sin:"No you don't, you're dead"
SAVAGE AF
the biggest problem is Clark Kent a reporter doesn't know who Bruce Wayne is. Batman, a detective, doesn't know who Superman is. That should've been figured out within the first 20 minutes of the movie.
and lex luthor knows both of their identities before the movie begins
Haha yes but also no one knows that. Lex Luther is a super
Villain not a gay nerd
Marcel
Its called plot convenience...its there in marvel movies too....oh wait , ur a marvel Fanboy!
So what, just bcuz he's a reporter doesn't.mean he has to know everyyyyyyy thingggggg!! Although he did know who batman was....I don't think u have seen the movie
Lemme rephrase that.... he knew that there was a batman who existed and vice versa
WB: How many comic storylines you want to include in BvS?
Snyder: Yes
It’s like trying to put in the three Lord of the Rings books into one movie 😂
No sin for Thomas Wayne immediately attacking the mugger like an idiot and getting his wife and himself killed?
Geeze that point gets me every time I see him and his wife die. Just give the guy everything...Thomas you are a billionaire....who cares about a thousand dollars and jewelry? No material possessions are worth someone's life.
+Taiya001 would you rather have those material possessions or Bin Laden?
TweeDee
Totally missed the context dude. -_-;;;
+Taiya001 I know, but it wasn't meant to be a serious question lol
That's because he's the Comedian.
I am surprised you only needed only twenty one minutes. I had this pegged for an hour long episode.
....or a 2-part video...heck, even YT has it's limitations :-)
+Tim Dev mad?
+Tim Dev bad day?
+Tim Dev so different opinions equals morons?
wait for the ultimate edition
Honestly i'd remove a sin for Ben Affleck's performance. He was a surprisingly good Batman, which i bet hardly anyone expected. The rest I mostly agree with
We'll see about Leto... I'm not too fond of the tatooed joker...
Why do people hate on Ben Affleck, he is an amazing actor, they all judge him off of Daredevil, that movie doesn't reflect on him as an actor at all, that movie was shit because of the writers!
+M10_CR7 and they sadly wasted their talents in shit movies,but hopefully when Ben Affleck directs his own Batman movie, they can make it work and put DC back on track,assuming Justice League sucks,which it probably will thanks to the man hack snyder, wonder woman could be great but I don't think it's enough to fix this cinematic universe
+TheSahio just saw Suicide Squad and Jared did an amazing performance, I got happy every time he appeared. 👍👍👍
+TheSahio And the movie was Incredible.
I always hated how no one explained how the bat cave was made. Only exception is Christopher Nolan's version because Fox's basement level with his inventions was pushed away then used by Bruce but he still had an actual cave so who knows.
Why do we need to know, hes a batman who has been batman for 20 years, hes obviously built the batcave and upgraded it along the way. Unless people just wanted it to be another batman origin story
They literally explained it in Batman Begins.
I invite everyone to read the holy Quran
I don't think Bruce Wayne hallucinated the The Flash warning him, that's just the speed force and Barry doing crazy things
He didn't when Bruce "wakes up" there are a few papers still in the air, dreams don't make papers float
They do when i wake up and they dance to sometimes they do the macarena
I agree.
In the TV show Barry can run faster then time like in season 1 when he ran back to the night his mom gets killed.
And Batman didn't know who Superman was and Lois Lane was just a regular reporter to him, and Batman hasn't even met the Flash
yeah and they didnt bring this shit up in the JL movie so this was a complete waste of time
Penis
9:29
1% chance=absolute certainty is basically how I've been living so far.
It's how I play Fallout as well.
That cinemasins remark is dumb. Obviously he means that even if there is just 1% chance of him being hostile, that is serious enough to necessitate the attempt to kill Superman. Not that I necessarily agree with it, but it is not illogical or anything.
@@Riwillion No Cinema Sins is absolutely right. 1% chance means that is more likely to NOT be true than it is to be true. I mean if you think about EVERYTHING has some chance of happening however tiny. There is a tiny chance you COULD win the lotto, so does that mean you will win the lotto with absolute certainty and therefore should rely on winning the lotto? Let's say in the 1970s that the US believed that there was a 1% chance that Russia would launch all its nukes at the US within the next hour (for instance during the Cuban missile crisis). Should the US therefore launch all its own missiles at Russia because clearly a 1% chance is an absolute certainty? Logic is based on taking in the evidence and considering the consequences. If the US launches all its missiles at Russia then there is guaranteed certainty that Russia will launch all its nuclear missiles at the US but a 1% chance that Russia will launch its missiles means that Russia probably won't. So you are choosing between guaranteed annihilation and a 1% chance at annihilation. According to Batman's logic you have to choose the guaranteed annihilation everytime.
Batman treating something which is more likely to be false as if it should be guaranteed as being true is therefore illogical, irresponsible and evil given the implications of that decision. According to Batman we should never investigate any crime to make sure that an allegation isn't false. We should never avoid using military force, never diversify our portfolios, never should have gone to the moon, never should even risk getting out of bed because that tiny percent chance that something could go wrong GUARANTEES that it should be treated as absolutely going wrong.
GeorgeMonet a hostile Superman could spell the end for humanity. From Batman’s perspective in this scene, it’s uncertain what Supes’ intentions are. If further information demonstrates that there is indeed a small chance of Superman being hostile, Batman should treat it as a certainty.
4 scenarios:
A. Supes is not a threat, but Batman treats him as a foe, even though it’s still uncertain. Best case is Superman convinces Bats that he’s not a villain. Undesirable outcomes: Superman kills Batman and Batman is dead, or Batman kills Superman and may have to live with that for the rest of his life if he later finds out Supes was not maleficent.
B. Supes actually is hostile and Batman acts preemptively - this is the best chance at saving humanity.
C. Supes is not hostile and Batman chooses to do nothing - Batman likely has less intel than he would if he acted more aggressively, but the world is safe.
D. Supes is hostile and Batman does nothing: gg Earth.
1% is not minuscule, comparing the odds of winning the lotto to a 1% chance of humanity perishing was absurd. You can still argue that equating a 1% chance to acting as if it were undoubtedly true to be unwarranted, but I understand Batman’s sentiment of not wanting to run the small risk of extinction.
And Batman never said anything about getting out of bed or going to the moon or military strategy, and it was inappropriate to extrapolate that dialogue to those ideas.
@@Riwillion
BvS is one of the most nitpicked movies ever made. I bet it would go into the guinnes world record book.
"I miss you son"
"No you don't your dead"
I lost it there 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You're
Amal Pinto just stop
@@gideon6459 you're most probably americans/british, and no really there's still people complaining about being corrected when they say "was" instead of "were" and they say "your" instead of "you're" and viceversa like It's something hard to get, people get annoyed by this? at least feel lucky you don't speak Spanish or French or even worse Italian that has more rules than english
@wolfaesthetic Oooh... You shouldn't have said that! 😄
I'm French Canadian and a perfect bilingual, and I have friends who are Anglophones that had a very, VERY hard time with French rules. I have never, despite my notorious asshatery, EVER called them illiterates for a pointless typo or made fun of them for literally screwing nearly every gendered nouns that are infamously hard to memorize!
So I tip my hat to the biggest asshole of the comment section and today I designate you as the winner! Here's your 🏆!
At 9:30 Bruce states that" If we believe that there is even a 1% chance that he is our enemy then we have to take it as an absolute certainty." to which you responded, "Math is not one of Bruce's strong suits." Actually, he is correct.
If an outcome has a possibility of occurring over an interval (years, months, weeks, days, hours) then the likelihood of that outcome increases over time. Imagine tossing a ball back and forth to a friend, if the outcome of one of you not catching (dropping the ball) exists as a 1% likelihood, over time that likelihood increases, and with sufficient time becomes inevitable.
Most of the time, this channel just trolls, but i do take these as jokes
No, actually it remains 1% the entire time. You just committed what is known as the Gambler's Fallacy. If the chance is 1% it is 1% every time, all the time, never any greater. Each toss is independent and has the same percentage. At 100 tosses, still 1%. That is what 1% probability means.
@@MyMagnificentOctopus The Gambler's Fallacy applies to non-sentient objects (dice, cards) where the variables are relatively constant, and the outcome is not informed by history because the mechanisms are not conscious. However, it's a poor metaphor for how humans (or a superhuman) would respond to an infinite variety of inputs over time. For example, while powerful, Superman can experience fatigue, both mental and physical, as well as anguish, regret, sadness, etc., and he could conceivably explore alternate paths toward his objective of world peace when met with repeated failure.
Simply put, throughout a lifetime, sentient beings don't make the same decisions under the same circumstances at all times, and our choices are informed by past experience, as opposed to a roll of dice where there are a prescribed set of possible outcomes (which is where you're getting your constant).
@@AntoineDennison On the other hand, assigning any fixed probability of a sentient being doing something is also rather absurd, given what you just said, so the whole probability part is kind of pointless. (Also, wasn't the point it was a 1% chance he might EVER go rogue, so it really wasn't a day to day one, making it irrelevant how much time passed.)
@@MyMagnificentOctopus There was no fixed probability. There was only a minimal (arbitrary) threshold of 1%. But the point was intended to suggest the likelihood wasn't 0. Second, because the probability wasn't 0, that means that with time and experience as factors, there is an increased likelihood of a negative outcome. It's not a fixed set of probable, independent results like a roll of the dice (Gamblers Fallacy).
You're right about the time the day-to-day time interval. It could be second-to-second or whatever time frame a superbeing would use to evaluate and assess the objectives of their efforts relative to the reality on the ground. Also, we don't have an infinite time horizon, only the lifetime of the superbeing in question and the lifetime of the human species. The last assumption would be that the superbeing wouldn't operate within a behavioral loop, correcting each successive failure.
I'm surprised there was no sin for how murder-happy Batman was in this film. He even uses guns.
Yeah, what's up with that? The only other time I remember him using a gun was in the pilot for, _Batman Beyond_, and he looked and it and realized 'I'm too old for this &%$#.'
Thought he only used guns in the dream sequence? Then again....I fell asleep in this movie.
+Ben N (BNuts) batman shoots a chick in the dark knight comic, also, Keaton killed plenty of people...and Bale used guns & missiles too... also killed people
Phil Verhey I guess Frank Miller's batman decided to take over for a while.
batman used guns in the first burton movie too michael keaton batman straight murdered guys like crazy
The problem with this movie is its trying to catch up with the MCU and making cross over movies before firmy establishing everyone. We had a bunch of movies establishing characters before we got The Avengers. Here all we have is the Man of Steel and staright to this. This tried to be a climactic showdown with characters we just met
they had this same exact problem with suicide squad
I don't watch movies anymore. I watch cinemasins and then pretend that I've seen these movies.
sounds like life sucks.
+VPT2 only if they do every movie. But most likely they just do big box office movies
same
All these videos do is nitpick though, so you're gonna have a pretty jaded view on all movies if you think these vids are brilliant criticisms.
Copycat
When Doomsday looks at the Superman statue in anger. I was going crazy. You can still see the zod in him that’s mad at Superman for dooming their race.
The funny thing is Eisenberg thought he auditioned for The Riddler which his over the top acting and his appearance makes total sense for.
And if The riddler AND Luthor would be in the movie, you haters would still cry about that its "too bloated" etc. lol...
The 80's Wolf No, this movie is crappy enough is "haters" don't need more ammo.
I think Bryan Cranston would have made a good Luthor.
Caitlin Brewer That's not fair. Bryan Cranston is a good anything.
and Jason Momoa thought his character would be Lobo, but then again..its Zack Snyder
a sin should have been added for every shot batman fired from that shot gun
maybe even a batman kill count mini-game at the end? maybe they can do a their very own special "directors cut ULTIMATE edition"
Why? Batman started out using guns.
Actually Batman is more a rip off of various characters Zorro 1919 rich playboy with weapons hidden in a cave and wore a dark blue suit with mask. The Bat a 1926 serial film character that had climbing rope, Bat signal, black automobile, Bat face mask which is actually more similar to The Cat's mask which appeared in Batman #1 and had a Cat face mask. She was later called Cat woman and abandoned the cat face mask for different masks. The Shadow first appeared on Radio in 1930 which is 4 years after the Bat. He also copies Black Bat a pulp magazine character from 1933 which wore gloves with those funny looking wing things sticking out and a similar mask. Also copies the Phantom 1936 with shorts over pants and white eyes in his mask, and has tracking dog. Batman's tracking dog was called ace and the bathound. The Bat serial film was remade and released as Bat Whisperer in 1933 and Bob Kane admitted he saw the film. The makers of the film sued Bob Kane. Bob Kane paid for losing the suit, an bought the film rights to The Bat.
*grenade launcher*
don't worry the bullets are "rubber"
I think we can all agree that Ben Affleck as Batman is the only redeeming thing in this movie.
agree, best batman/bruce wayne we ever got
I thought Wonder Woman was badass in the movie.
Wonder Woman too. Love Gal Gadot as WW.
+BBQ nachos kevin conroy end of story
And Wonder Woman and the fact that Henry Cavill so is fucking HOTT!!!!! 😍😍😍
"Is it stealing if you steal from another thief?"
My response was also a quick "YESSS"
12:55 I find it funny how the dramatic timing of Lex saying "god vs man" then a clap of thunder is acknowledged as "oh, come on"
The
"Man VS God"
Controversy.
I just realized something.
Where the HELL is everything wrong with Justice League
The whole movie is what's wrong with it dood, sin video would be too long
@@I_am_a_cat_ I mean a suicide squad was made so...
It was to terrible so cienama sins thought I'm not gonna do this never
double negative, so they are going to do it ?
Infinity War doesn't exist. Justice League was trying to copy Infinity War. Therefore Justice League doesn't exist
Take out the desert scene, the courtroom, actually scrap the whole thing: Have lex come up with a plan to destroy half the planet, have batman want to kill him but superman saves his life, then have lex do something so dirty to batman that he blames superman for not letting him kill him in the first place. Replace all that courtroom mumble jumble with some of clark & lois together so we actually care about that relationship. Have wonder woman break up the fight at the end because she can. And save the villain and his death for another movie
Why was Zach Snyder the director of this movie and not you?
Me Miss Marie This is a great scenario .
Me Miss Marie you are hired
It is a story or screenplay suggested here any rate it is still BETTER then the film we got
Endowing Superman with even a modicum of the super-intelligence he is supposed to possess would be a good start; at least he could get involved rather than just mope about letting everyone he encounters fuck with him without his realising or even attempting to fight his own corner.
That Martha scene deserved a million sins.
Sarthak Srivastava Why?!
The Mad Titan bc it’s so confusing
Just because it's confusing to YOU. Doesn't mean it doesn't make sense to others
Sheikh Ahmed it’s not confusing, it’s just dumb and bad
@@JV-yq7dx agreed
You should do a BONUS ROUND. X10 sins everytime Lex waxes philosophical from Snyder's Psych.101 textbook.
the movie would have like 600 sins
Only 600?
How about a bonus round that doubles the total EVERY TIME SOMEONE IS WATCHING THE NEWS
every time Superman unnecessarily crashes through the ceiling
Every time Batman *blatantly* kills someone.
"Here I am, I lose signal when I'm under and umbrella." Must have T Mobile.
T Mobile.
Can’t argue there. Just upgraded my phone and they switched me from Sprint to T-Mobile. It averages only 2-3 bars of signal...even though the phone has 5G support...
While in the theater seeing this I asked my friend who's a Super-Man fan (I personally don't like the character as he's WAY to OP),
"Who are they burying?" -this was the funeral scene for Super-Man
"Super-Man" was his answer
"Who are the Kent's burying?"
"Clark Kent obviously"
"How?? They're the same person."
"Oh yeah.... I don't know."
/smh
The military didn't bury anyone. It's an empty casket. The wooden one that's buried in Kanas is where Clark/Superman really is.
If the Military were informed of Superman's identity, I can see that being done out of respect.
Honestly however, I suspect Batman swapped Superman's body with an innocent civilian so the Clark's could have their son.
This means that someone took Superman and dressed him as Clark Kent. But who???
Bruce mentions to Diana that the military was burying an empty box.
Mistah Bryan the military thinks that the nuke killed him, that would a) leave his corpse in space or b) the nuke disintegrated him. pick one.
Now that I've watched Man of Steel my biggest complaint is that this, this is the direct sequel!
I did not love Man of Steel but in retrospect, it was way more enjoyable than Batman V Superman!
You better fucking do Suicide Squad. Also, they didn't have logos before the movie started and so help me God, you are going to include that!
Oh boy
You know, they have to at this point.
think he does Sins after the movies on dvd...ps youre cute
+Dnizzle227 your name reminds of a dick drizzle
+[Kritternator] tf is a cringy emoji????😂😂😂😂😂 you white ppl make up shit by the days end
Really glad that even CinemaSins agreed that the warehouse scene was the best Batman fight in movies.
I invite everyone to read the holy Quran
You know if they potray this as a batman movie more,things could have been different!!
Save Martha!
Did we just become best friends?
Yup!
Do you wanna go do karate in the garage?
Yup!.
Robert Ostler people hate what they don’t understand
Scrub no it’s just poorly executed, and I kinda get it but the director didn’t explained it in a clever way so it is still a miss opportunity scene
Mad Titan it’s called use your head solving for X is fucking stupid but we have to explain and no one complains
That explains your hatred for the criticism of this movie.
If movies make audiences confused especially in this kind of important moment then they should really check it again cuz it’s just a disappointing scene
I like that he removed sins for Bruce Wayne's badassery at the beginning there
jessie would make a better riddler, maybe a good joker? but i definitely don't see him as lex luthor
To think of it, he was a better Joker in this movie than Leto in SS...
Exactly - his mannerisms, the way he held those photos of Matha (like Joker held his cards), the overcomplicated plan and riddiculous kitchen timer. Very Joker-style.
Well he is not the joker, he is Alexander Luthor the SON of Lex Luthor, not that hard to understand...
Snyder chose Eisenberg as Luthor because he wanted to see something else......I`m afraid.
I say Snyder was trying to make the next Heath Ledger Joker in a movie he convinced himself was “epic” but had no idea what made him such a good villain to begin with
Also also, as someone that has passed through some... dark experiences, I can honestly tell there are some things that can trigger a panic attack, Bruce is still human and his parents have been used against him before
over the top perfectly explains it. shame he became lex luthor. with that acting, he couldve been riddler.
True, they wasted the potential of Jessie esenburg.
Whoa you're right; he would have been a great riddler!
My goodness he would've been a perfect riddler
Good point
Remember when he was first cast and people compared him to Heath Ledger breaking expectations with The Joker?
Yeah, that's not always going to be the case people...
15:34 that's the point. It wasn't about showing us that his mom's name was martha but that his father cared for someone else's life while losing his own. That's exactly what Superman does... With his dying breath, he literally calls out for someone else who will die by letting this happen.
Too bad I'm way late on this video
Not dceu superman for sure
@@pedrocavalcantesantana7378 oh yeah we're clearly not watching a dceu superman movie are we?....
@Divvay Khatri you make an interesting point and I think that your idea finally explains why the film focused this much on this Martha thing, you are actually the only person I know of who has been able to do that. The problem however, is that if Superman had said any other name but Martha, Batman would have killed him without hesitation, which he was actually going to do if Lois didn’t arrive just in time to tell him that Martha is the name of Superman’s mother.
Divvay Khatri it’s not even that...superman could be like save my mother...matha..that would makes sense...just saying Martha...is bullshit way to bring back batman from rage and I understand what you said but sorry the execution was lousy
@@lostindreams5341 not really the execution was simple and easy to understand But then there’s people like you lmao
The biggest sin in this movie was letting superman hold a kryptonite spear to kill the monster instead of letting someone who is not invulnerable to kryptonite
maybe when batman leads the zod-luthor monster thing to the city so he can somehow retrieve the spear while fighting an unkillable monster instead of GETTING THE SPEAR FIRST
Why do I get the feeling Lex here would be a better Joker than the Joker from Suicide Squad?
o-o Huh. That works out pretty well.
Kuroda Cursus Doesn't it though?
Hell no he'd be a good riddler though
When I first saw Batman v Superman my mom kept thinking lex was joker and so did I XD
Nah absolute garbage joker compared to leto
The sad thing is, this doesn't cover even half of what is wrong with the movie.
its not supposed to though
This should be two parts.
+Oreo Without The Creme yeah cuz "everything" doesn't mean everything 😒
Just admit the entire movie was wrong. He put too much into the movie that didnt belong for the love of competition with Marvel and his focus was too much on Batman
What a roast.
Every time I see Eisenberg’s Luther, I am reminded of all the things Kevin Smith said about his experiences with Prince, down to Prince having his own basketball court and being an excellent player.
17:55: I hate to be that guy, but Wonder Woman's bracelets can deflect any projectile. I've heard she's even used them to deflect a planet destroying blast launched by the Gods.
Which begs the question if why doesn't she have a weapon that kills anything.
+Napalm Blaziken Of*
Just because she has one thing doesn't mean she should have the other. They don't come in Happy Meals.
Tsuruya San
No. She has superman for that. He is her _"weapon that kills anything."_
~Apparently~ In some comic stories, Superman loves Wonder Woman instead of Lois Lane. Gweugh \ᇂ_ᇂ\
Trapdoor Majesty And Bruce Timm, the creator of Batman the Animated Series, Justice League, and more, hated the romance.
There's so much unnecessary BS in this movie. Take out all the dream sequence crap, Justice League set up, Wonder Woman, and Doomsday. Make Lex completely different and focus the film on simply what is in the title: Batman V Superman.
Exactly. I spent the last forty minutes just sighing and asking when it was going to end because it was just too much. They tried to put too much into what could have been a great movie.
true
Wonder Woman was the best part of the movie
Bakatora04 She was, but it was meant to be about Batman V Superman....
+Hayley Weasley I thought I was the only one. I could feel my head start to throb because of the complete absurdity of it all towards the last couple of minutes in the movie.
The "I'm not dead!" part at the end got me so bad.
It's from Monty Python's "King Arthur and the Holy Grail"
wessltov lol "he's not quite dead. he might pull through"
"No, he's not. He'll be stone dead in a moment" Haha!
14:00 Superman has X-Ray vision and heard Bruce's radio communications earlier in the movie, so thats how Clark knew Bruce's identity, as for Bruce knowing Clark's identity, he's the World's Greatest Detective
What? Bruce didn't know Clark's identity, and even if he did, you can't chalk it up to, "Batman is the world's greatest detective, duh" because that's simply bad story-telling. Relying on that fact to make you believe in those logical gaps in the story doesn't allow for a coherent and believable plot. By the way, Batman got duped pretty hard in this film anyway, so he was in no way a good detective in this film. Everything he finds out about Superman and by extension, virtually everything he does in this film, aside from within the third act, was all deliberately planned by Luthor; batman just fell right into his trap the whole way through.
I invite everyone to read the holy Quran
Stop fucking saying "They should've judged by the ultimate edition". NO.
The studio decided to cut those parts out of the movie for some reason. The original, full movie, as it came out in theaters, when you went to see it and payed money for it, wasn't the ultimate edition. You shouldn't have to pay extra money just to add material to the movie in order for it to make sense.
They removed those scenes because people nowadays can't sit through movies longer than 2 hours and 30 minutes and theaters wouldn't be able to have more showings
Besides all those lord of the rings, hobbit and Harry Potter movies?
The "original, full movie" is the Ultimate Edition in this case, precisely because theater chain owners demand shorter runtimes for big blockbuster films to maximize showings and profits. The studios follow suit as it benefits their profits as well. Batman v Superman was a case of the original cut being trimmed and haphazardly edited, not a case of the final cut as decided by the filmmaker throwing in more scenes as a home video bonus.
+Wade Wilson The funny thing is that WB owns those properties lmao and they let the directors do it more than 2 hrs and 30 mins so why couldn't they do it for BvS? The world may never know.
I saw the ultimate edition and its only mildly better, it does not change any of the big flaws (except for how sups was framed)
"Becuase newspapers writers play musical chairs with the type of stories they write..."
Coming from a news reporter....We do.
You would be excellent at cinema sinning cinema sins
"Becuase?" See what happens when your editor is not around?
C'mon the line "Meet your Doomsday" is worth at least 50 sins by itself
Jerry Senpai Naaah
Because?
And the whole Martha scene is worth at least 500 sins
Temporary Bullshit only 500? I think 500,000
That's what critics said for Snyder's career
"This family literally managed to get to the roof with their bodies and white paint...and that's it"
🤣🤣🤣
I think you missed a sin here 2:50 : Africa is not a country.
Jasmim Bettencourt damn even I missed that
Also it should say Nairobi (capital of Kenya) and not "Nairomi".
americans dont care
Actually, like with Gotham and Metropolis, they made up Nairomi. Since it's just fiction, they could have made it a country in Africa; it doesn't have to be a city/county/whatever.
Nairomi's actually a fictional country in the DC universe.
The sin at 2:45, how the kryptonian ship crashed in the Indian Ocean. That was the world engine from the first Superman movie, the one he destroys to stop the terraforming of earth.
And nobody cared about the alien ship lmaoooo
nothimme Because he made it seem completely unexplained when it literally was in the last movie
@nothimme explaining why the sin is factually incorrect, not really defending more calling the video on its bullshit.
Does RUclips have cinema sin's sins? All these disconnected comments in all these videos would get more views then the original depending on the movie being reviewed.
Hopes this makes its way to Zack Snyder some how
We the viewers can do it
i would wanna see his reaction and what was your opinion on it couch tomato.I honestly liked it
+Eirik Holsæter (lille5nik) I watched that video to
+Rahul Dharan Just shut up.
Everyone tweet it to him Now!!!
I remember I was watching this with my mom, brother, and grandma and they was all on superman's side because he was defenseless in the fight even though he really wasn't because he could've killed batman in the first 10 seconds of the fight
I'm pretty disappointing there wasn't a bonus round for slow motion.
Some directors have weird fetishes, eh? Tarantino and his foot fetish, Snyder and his slow motion fetish, Bay and his explosion fetish...
Zack Snyder loves slow motion almost as much as M. Night S. Loves obvious/stupid twists.
Tru
Mr. Okay This movie went over the top with it though, its just inexcusable.
*There was barely any slow motion though.*
How many potatoes do I need to send you to do: Everything Wrong with Deadpool
Same amount of potatoes it takes to cure blindness apparently.
+Peter Gray
Lmao
OMG YOU'RE ON CINEMASINS YAYYYY
Guess the JK videos aren't coming out fast enough for you
There's nothing wrong with Deadpool.
Introducing Doomsday in only the _second_ film in the DCEU is _way_ too early and should've been done further down the road for the films. Also, the villain should've been Metallo. Lex Luthor wants Superman dead because he's "too powerful", so when Batman fails to kill him, he creates Doomsday, who's like five times stronger than Superman. That makes no sense. Wouldn't it have made more sense if Luthor relied more on a human in a weaponized suit instead of making something even more powerful than Superman? The guy in the wheelchair-- hates Superman with a flaming passion, goes so far to team up with Lex Luthor to take him down? He'd become Metallo. Metallo would go mad with power, thus forcing Superman and Batman (and WW of course) to form an alliance of convenience, but this movie insists on going all the way just for the sake of cramming so much stuff, so it would catch up with Marvel.
this
Jarek Gunther thank you i give you a clap and a salute metallo would have made perfect sense
Definitely agree. Doosmday comes out of nowhere in the film. Check out a video in my channel where I "try" to fix Batman V Superman! Thanks :D
by the way the only reason batman reacts to Martha is because batman is still dealing about his parents death
epicapples why Yeah. Because Batmans mom is *also* named Martha
We went into the theatre late so we missed the slow motion batparents death scene. Thank god.
The Wayne in pain chooses mainly to complain..🤣🤣🤣
Think I just shit me pants
better writing then the movie hahaha
No sin for Nairobi, Africa and opposed to Nairobi, Kenya?
After all, Africa is a continent, not a country.
It's Nairomi, not Nairobi. It's a fictional location within the DC universe.
Joshua Galloway like wakanda but worse?
@@ymer.780 Haha it's nothing like Wakanda beyond the fact that it's a fictional African place.
Joshua Galloway so better than Wakanda because it makes sense in the universe (where cities like Metropolis and Gotham exist) and doesn’t defy all understanding.
Why isn’t Wakanda well known to everyone? Either they’ve been killing/imprisoning everyone who stumbled upon it over the entire course of human history, or it’s magic. It’s in an African desert, not a rainforest, and it’s far to technologically advanced to be sufficiently independent from needing imports to not be a well known place.
retsaM innavoiG that’s a whole lot of “it’s vibranium okay!” For me, but honestly I don’t care about the impossibilities of a material like vibranium (like how it’s perfect for electronics AND weaponry AND armor and more which all requires different levels of ductilibility, conductivity, and malleability
The point is that Wakanda makes as much sense as if South Korea suddenly ceased exporting computer technology in favor of returning to an agricultural feudal society
Not to mention the difficulties in achieving anything technologically advanced when tribal-esque society is the only existing society. Innovation requires variation and tribal societies subsist on unity and zealotry. Actually, that’s not entirely true, unified and zealot societies can achieve a great deal in terms of technological advancements, most notably the Nazis during WWII.
Wakanda makes as much sense as a kid getting bit by a spider and developing super reflexes and sticky fingers
I just realised Dc comics is always a sin because Dc means Detective comics so dc comics means detective comics comics
Sneeman98 It's a curious aspect to be sure, but that's not why DC gets a sin. Jeremy gives DC a sin for simply being DC. DC doesn't have a good track record with movies
@@Madman-ym8dh DC's biggest mistake is superman. Stupidly overpowered character who should never have been made so op. If he can lift infinity itself how is it even feasable for batman to be able to fight him? Or anyone for that matter. Crime should come to a stop just because he exists. Its really stupid how op he is.
@@TheMegaultrachicken I mean.. as I've started reading the comics... superman while insanely powerful... has had people who can stand up toe to toe with him and he also has a ridiculous weak affinity to magic. Sad we've yet to see any of that though.
@@TheMegaultrachicken he was the first hero, 1934
@@TheMegaultrachicken I'm not a DC fan, but you do know that that doesn't apply to every version of him, right? He can't lift infinitely. He's incredibly strong, but his strength still has limits.
I love how predictable the justice league plot was for him to guess that they revive superman
Wouldn't the Batman brand be bragging rights in prison? In this universe, Batman is a savage killer. Wouldn't the Bat-brand establish you as a badass because you survived an encounter with the bat?
maybe they beat people up because they brag
He branded criminals who hurt children, so people would know what they did....and most prisoners beat up/rape/kill people who do that stuff.
Batman doesn't kill bruv
+Jowny Gaming in he movie he did tho lol
So apparently a decent movie was left on the cutting room floor and they delivered the leftovers to the theaters.
If Cinema Sins did "Everything Wrong with Suicide Squad", it would have to be in 2 hours or less
There are a couple major plot holes, but it's mostly sound. There would have to be tons of sins removed for awesome fight sequences.
I loved it.
y tho its one of the best movies out there now did u even watch it
but why that movie was awesome I don't understmad why people hate it
+Dr. Gonzo that's because critics are marvel fan boys
When his dad said "Martha", he was talking about the dog who ate alphabet soup and learned to talk, not his wife.
Hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahzzhhaahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
Martha speaks!
ha
Whuuuut🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
That's a deep cut brah
Not enough references to such a good kids show in the world.
The Flash part wasn’t because Bruce was having a vision. The Flash can time travel and that was my first thought when I saw that scene. I figure they might explain it in the Flash movie
Everything wrong with Batman v Superman in one word:
Everything
and for this unoriginal post i give you this L
+nortan27 L
+nortan27 shove this L up your ass Son
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! xD
talesin- god of the internet ding ding ding dingdingding
using Neil Dgt for your own personal projects..hey wait a second
i was thinking the same thing
That joke Just flew over your head huh
#superman .
I saw what they did there.
lmaoooo. gravity
+Adventist they collaborated with him for many sci fi movies.
Man, this has been a big year of "firsts" for me. First movie I've ever seen on opening night (Spectre), first movie I've seen twice in theaters (Star Wars: The Force Awakens), first video game I've every pre-ordered (No Man's Sky), and first movie I've ever decided to walk out on in theaters (Batman v. Superman)! I'm on a roll!
Wow, congrats. I actually had the opening night one for The Force Awakens - very first showing in the city!
Luke Dias I actually went on the Thursday night preview for that as well! It was a later showing, but it was still pretty cool to see people in Star Wars costumes at the theater!
+KingInky13 lol nice. You were really that bored of BvS. I didn't walk out but I did feel like sleeping tho
I would have walked out, but my ticket was free and leaving meant going back to work... tough call
WOW either a comic book nerd or a women. both scenarios are extremely virgin and feminine and you should just go ahead and start wearing dresses...lol
3:10 I dunno, maybe he's got super hearing or something 4:00 Superman destroyed a city on his first public appearance, why would Bruce be interested in him before that? 5:20 Yes, it's a kryptonite scalpel. And? 6:05 No, the bucket of piss is Luthor's real reason for wanting to import kryptonite, rather than the PR spin he's giving the authorities 9:25 Or...the Flash is sending a message into the past? 10:38 The answer is "Because they knew he'd come if Lois was in danger" How did you not get that? Even when Luthor pulls the exact same trick next time he wants to summon Superman? 12:57 What, Superman kills now? Fly him to prison maybe, but "obliterate him"? 14:04 Yes. He overheard Bruce's radio communication. You commented on it. 15:33 Martha's a common name? How many Marthas do you know who aren't the mother of Batman or Superman and were created in the first half of the last century? 19:40 Or it's the film's 20th dream sequence?