2022 Nobel Prize in Physics Quantum Entanglement Experiments Explained - Aspect, Zeilinger, Clauser.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 окт 2022
  • Here I go over some of the concepts behind this years Nobel Prize in physics, which was awarded to Anton Zeilinger, Alain Aspect and John Clauser for Experiments on Quantum Entanglement and the CHSH Tests.

Комментарии • 20

  • @MuonRay
    @MuonRay  Год назад +4

    Apologies but I had to cut the section featuring Prof. Anton Zeilinger - RUclips restricted it for some reason for half my audience.

  • @crazieeez
    @crazieeez Год назад +3

    Quantum tunneling requires a certain distance from a barrier to work. Wormhole is one explanation how entangled electrons communication travel faster than the speed of light. AN electron is very very small and very very very dense. It is so dense that it can be considered a small black hole and when put close together can create a rip in spacetime just like when two black holes come in contact with each other. Electron has charged, it won't merge but become entangled. The physical process for entanglement is like this: Two electrons put close enough together creates a rip in spacetime linking them together. Remember spacetime is very noisy at the Planck's scale.

  • @DrSteveBrady
    @DrSteveBrady Год назад +6

    I have been watching that documentary for YEARS! Ever since I found it on youtube. I see now that it was you who posted it. Thank you!! It is just FANTASTIC! It is a shame Bell died prematurely, or I think he would have won a Nobel Prize.

  • @johnsheehan5109
    @johnsheehan5109 Год назад +8

    Perhaps it confirms John Wheeler's speculation that there is only 1 electron.

  • @vanikaghajanyan7760
    @vanikaghajanyan7760 Год назад +1

    Any measurement of a physical quantity involves some interaction between the measuring device and the object under study. In this case, not only the object under study affects the device, changing its state (due to which measurement becomes possible), but the device also acts on the object under study, changing its state to some extent.
    Thus, in the general case, the observer is an evolving (- when measuring, his state changes), researcher of the spontaneous evolution of the Universe.
    The complete state function is a plane monochromatic wave that coincides with the de Broglie wave. Of course, such a coincidence comes from the fact that the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, and then the peculiarity of the wave function is that the normalization condition is not fulfilled for it - when a particle is detected, its probability is one; on the contrary, with the free movement of a particle, there is an equal probability of detecting a particle at any point in space. Physically, this is caused by the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, and therefore the concept of free movement is some idealization of the real state of affairs. And quantum mechanics admits the possibility of states close to free, which is unsatisfactory. That is, the observer always measures everything permanently (often without even suspecting it), for example, the observer monitors the state of Schrodinger's cat due to the simple phenomenon called interaction, and does not expect any surprise after opening the box with the cat (this applies to experiments with entangled particles and double-slit effects). Interaction is a dimension.Measurement is a measure of awareness of the observer/object interaction. P.S. "The inner perfection of the theory requires its external (experimental) justification." (Einstein). It seems that the external (experimental) "justification" of quantum mechanics has long demanded its internal perfection.

  • @MitzvosGolem1
    @MitzvosGolem1 Год назад +3

    Excellent 👍 I save this to show others. Best explanation I found .

    • @MuonRay
      @MuonRay  Год назад +1

      Glad it was helpful!

    • @MitzvosGolem1
      @MitzvosGolem1 Год назад +1

      @@MuonRay This experiment perhaps changed my entire view on everything.. Incredible .
      I retired from Fermilab BNL accelerators . Feynman' was there in 80s when I was a Kid working there.
      I knew nothing of physics then just a technician.
      I later took physics in University and realized how much I didn't know.

  • @johnhodge6610
    @johnhodge6610 Год назад +1

    Not Aspec's experiment. He changed the polarity after the splitting at some distance and found the other changed also at a distance that required faster than light signal.

  • @glynndraper437
    @glynndraper437 Год назад +1

    I love that old entanglement film by aspect with the basic graphics

  • @Muonium1
    @Muonium1 Год назад +2

    Ok so why calcium? What is the mechanism there? Fluorescence is just the emission of a single photon. Laser emission is just photon stimulated fluorescence of a single photon. How are they getting two photons out in an entangled state?

  • @vanikaghajanyan7760
    @vanikaghajanyan7760 Год назад +1

    This prize is not yet the end of the series of recent years, where the Nobel Prize in physics (!) was awarded to astronomers, mathematicians, climatologists: it looks like astrologers are waiting in line.

  • @terrylyn
    @terrylyn Год назад

    Give Nobel for E.T Jaynes for basically launching quantum bayesianism.

  •  Год назад +1

    Chrome tabs 😱

  • @xyzxyzxyzxyz636
    @xyzxyzxyzxyz636 Год назад +1

    Ha, ha ,ha! That"s wonderful, congratiulations to them, but that is not what REAL entanglement is. The particles have to be side by side, with their singularities aligned.

  • @georgcantor7172
    @georgcantor7172 Год назад

    Hey wait a minute. If there is no objective reality, then there are no wrong answers. And 2 + 2 = 123,456,5432. Whatever you want it to be! Anything goes! Everything doesn't exist. We're all an illusion! Why even go to school to learn illusions! :D

  • @glynndraper437
    @glynndraper437 Год назад +1

    Yep that's the one