Create Depth In Your Mix: Depth Using Reverb Masterclass
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024
- Learn the 5 keys to an industry standard mix: www.theobjecti...
FREE EQ & Compression Guides: www.dinosaurdo...
In this video I break down the essential fundamental techniques to learn reverb and utilize reverb to get incredible depth in your mix. I've been using this technique for years to create an incredible sense of depth in my mixes. Use this in any DAW, even though I'll be in Logic Pro X, feel free to take these fundamentals into any DAW and use any technique (even if you'e not using the depth matrix that I outline!)
Watch this video if you're struggling to create depth in your mixes and want the easy, scientifically proven path to depth in your mix.
The Objective Mix: www.theobjectivemix.com/
FREE EQ & Compression Guides: www.dinosaurdogstudio.com/EQ
Thank you for making a video that allows us to use reverbs effectively!
I tried the method, and for the first time, I can clearly hear the "mythical depth" that people have been talking about:)
Knowledge is power indeed.
Once again, thank you so much!
Glad this helped! Thanks for watching and commenting!
Thank you. Learned a lot from these clips. Good summary to the series on creating depth with reverb.
Thanks! Appreciate the comment and glad that it was educational. 🙂
Thank you!👍👍👍
You're welcome! Thanks for commenting!
Predelay is how big the room is or more precisely how close the source is to the walls, I don't think it make things closer
Do what works for you.
I'm just sharing what has worked for me and my clients to get pro-sounding mixes.
This is how I learned to think about it as well. However, what messes with my brain usually is generating depth with using very different Reverbs, I. E. When setting predelay on hall in the back, a room in the middle, and a plate in the front.
They all need totally different predelays to be convincing. Would you go by ear for this scenario? May be I am misunderstanding and it should be the opposite way around... 😅
Why are you using different reverbs for each space? Can't items be in the same room, but different distances from you? The point of this technique that I show is to keep everything in the same general "space" but different distances. Also, you don't really "hear" this in the mix - it's more of a "sense of depth" due to the high early-reflection balance to late reflection balance in most of these verbs.
Also, plate reverbs don't have early reflections - so I would never use a plate reverb to use for this technique.
@@ObjectiveMixing I actually thought that by doing this, putting realism aside, I may be able to create a more intense differenciation even.
But it may be that this can only be used either as an effect event or o on top of the rooms setup
@@philippgrunert8776 I've used different spaces before - but just be aware that you want to use SPACES - not just reverbs. Plate reverbs, for example, are just metal plates that we sent electric signals through to create reverb... not a real space.
As long as you're using real spaces - you can use different ones if you want. But you will sacrifice the "realness" factor that you mentioned.
I still prefer to use the same space, but then differentiate the elements with different effects - even if those effects are still a different kind of reverb (like plate verbs).
View this technique as more of a utility operation than an actual "effect".
@@ObjectiveMixing sound super logical. Thank you for the feedback. Basically, one of my main goal is going for this roomyness one may experience in say Nigel Godriches mixes on the album kid A. I always was under the impression he bakes in reverbs per track an leaves the vocals almost dry for extreme separation. That's why I only used the plate there. Then again it never quite worked so I seem to hear the wrong things.
BR
Can I get the easy picture chart version.
I'm not following...?
Simple
ever heard of print screen?
Only 3 reverbs??
For this utilitarian depth matrix - yes. I'll use other plate reverbs and such for the "creative" effects.