🤫 The 5 Secrets To Industry Standard Mixes (FREE Course): www.objectivemixing.com/secrets 🎧 The 4 Essential Compression Styles for Bedroom Producers (FREE Download): www.objectivemixing.com/EQ ✅ The Ultimate Mixing Checklist (FREE download): www.objectivemixing.com/checklist 📘 Learn how to get industry-quality mixes start-to-finish (Book): theobjectivemix.com/
Thanks David! Glad this was helpful and can't wait to hear your mixes after you read the book. :) If you have any questions just reply to any of my emails - they all come direct to me.
I really enjoyed this video. But it reminded me of why I always use Pro-Q3 over Logic's Channel EQ. The Channel EQ sounds totally fine, but it's so slow to grab bands and adjust their Q, etc. Plus, you have a very limited number of bands, which ultimately results in having to load more instance of the plugin. Granted, it does have the advantage of being free with Logic. Pro-Q3 is almost as expensive as Logic itself. But I'm still glad I got it because it's so much more user-friendly. When I'm trying to quickly find a frequency, it annoys me to be typing in numbers or struggling to get the right band selected. Again, though, thanks for the video.
Thanks for the comment and watching! I would be cautious of needing that many bands in an EQ. If you're creating more than 3-4 bands - then you likely should reset and figure out how to make more strategic moves in order to accomplish your task. The more bands you create - the more phase dispersion you're introducing to the audio signal, which will degrade it over multiple moves.
You can't mix a single "genre" like this. There is an objective standard of what a pro mix is - but you can't "template" it and make it sound radio-ready. The unknown factor is the input to the template to begin with. You can make your process faster with templates - but it cannot replace the process of actually mixing. For example; In this video, I have the bass fundamental around 100hz - but another song it might be around 75-80hz. How can I template that with a single template for every possible song??
I'll bite. What's incorrect about what I'm doing? I'm removing masking from the mix which increases the mix clarity - which helps it to translate to ANY system. Yes - there is another aspect to this about sonic balance as well - but that wasn't the point of this video. :)
🤫 The 5 Secrets To Industry Standard Mixes (FREE Course):
www.objectivemixing.com/secrets
🎧 The 4 Essential Compression Styles for Bedroom Producers (FREE Download):
www.objectivemixing.com/EQ
✅ The Ultimate Mixing Checklist (FREE download):
www.objectivemixing.com/checklist
📘 Learn how to get industry-quality mixes start-to-finish (Book):
theobjectivemix.com/
Great video! Love the song too!
Thanks for watching! Glad you enjoyed the track. :)
This was really helpful thankyou! I just bought your book!!
Thanks David! Glad this was helpful and can't wait to hear your mixes after you read the book. :) If you have any questions just reply to any of my emails - they all come direct to me.
I really enjoyed this video. But it reminded me of why I always use Pro-Q3 over Logic's Channel EQ. The Channel EQ sounds totally fine, but it's so slow to grab bands and adjust their Q, etc. Plus, you have a very limited number of bands, which ultimately results in having to load more instance of the plugin.
Granted, it does have the advantage of being free with Logic. Pro-Q3 is almost as expensive as Logic itself. But I'm still glad I got it because it's so much more user-friendly. When I'm trying to quickly find a frequency, it annoys me to be typing in numbers or struggling to get the right band selected.
Again, though, thanks for the video.
Thanks for the comment and watching! I would be cautious of needing that many bands in an EQ.
If you're creating more than 3-4 bands - then you likely should reset and figure out how to make more strategic moves in order to accomplish your task. The more bands you create - the more phase dispersion you're introducing to the audio signal, which will degrade it over multiple moves.
Thanks. Best/Mathias
Thanks for watching!
Why don't you sell mastered Logic Pro Templates for most genres like electronic etc?
You can't mix a single "genre" like this. There is an objective standard of what a pro mix is - but you can't "template" it and make it sound radio-ready. The unknown factor is the input to the template to begin with. You can make your process faster with templates - but it cannot replace the process of actually mixing.
For example; In this video, I have the bass fundamental around 100hz - but another song it might be around 75-80hz. How can I template that with a single template for every possible song??
Bc the room and monitors aren’t true. You’re making this crap up. It’s not helping folks. Please challenge me. I can prove your wrong
I'll bite. What's incorrect about what I'm doing? I'm removing masking from the mix which increases the mix clarity - which helps it to translate to ANY system. Yes - there is another aspect to this about sonic balance as well - but that wasn't the point of this video. :)