@@ib6294e's favourite for Wimbledon & no one can beat him as the new kids have yet to make their mark on the green stuff. You never know maybe Andy might get drawn together.
@@PretentiousStuff Without Murray the Big 3 would have become a closed shop. They feared Murray & your statement bears no reality to the impact Andy made. He is respected greatly by tennis players & even with a metal hip can give us the 2 best matches of AO 2023.
Commentators said that if novak loses the second set then he is going to lose the match because he is tired. How wrong were the commentators! Not only he won this mach but also he went on to win final with Nadal which was played over five hours
we saw that day how Nadal could no longer hold on his legs, face expression was begging for the match to end.but we still saw a physical freshness in Nole, who had 5 hours before the match in his legs. what an athlete!
That's because he's doping. Look at him from set 3 onwards. Hiding and eating stuff under his towel. Anyone can win 5 hour matches after doping. No biggie.
I absolutely love how Murray went for his forehand in this match, just pummelled it every time! This match was the start of something big for Murray. Djokovic is so tough to beat on this court.
Murray made the Wimbledon final this year (lost to Federer) and win the Olympic gold medal this year (got revenge on Federer) and then won the US Open this year (got revenge on Djokovic for this match)
Murray played probably one of his best matches of all time and still came up short. Just goes to show how good Djokovic was in that tournament. Unbeatable.
This is the match where i KNEW murray would win a slam, looks even better when u think of the epic novak and rafa put on just hours later, novak is an animal
Seriously how fucking good is Novak djokovic. Watch the match with a focus on his defense, his hands, his touch, his flexibility, his tenacity, his mental strength. He’s truly the greatest competitor in the history of tennis, with Nadal a very very close second.
Commentators are saying in the first set itself that novak looks exhausted. They also said that he looked tired against Hewitt and David Ferer. What is the end result? Novak went on to win this semifinal as well as longest AO final against Nadal. How wrong were the commentators? Brad gilbert predicted Murray to win in four sets against novak in 2011 final. What happened? These commentators are also biased like the crowd
Yeah I can’t believe the commentators get sucked into Djokovic’s antics he always acts tired gets his opponents into a false sense of security then ups his level and destroys them
Dude these commentators we're awful. Playing defensive is not the same as being exhausted. Hitting the ball deep is not the same as doing nothing with the ball. Novak won the longest slam final right after this match. Really bad
Yep - he played the point pretty well but Djokovic wasn’t going to hand him the break. Like you said - Murray should’ve pulled the trigger. His forehand and backhand were absolute fire in that match.
People forget just how good prime Murray was... he was number 2 not number 4(which people seem to remember him as) He beat Djokovic on center court in a Wimbledon final which is something Federer didn't do... and he pushed Novak to the brink here in Australia... he was a beast I started watching tennis in 2010 where I became a Novak fan (I know sounds like a bandwagon fan who is trying to emphasize that I came in before 2011 but it's actually true) so I remember these days like it was yesterday because it was then where my love for the sport started...Murray was a huge player in those years and it felt like it was him and Djokovic trying to break into the vice grip like lock 🔒 that Fedal had(especially with fans and commentators) I'm kind of sad seeing how it panned out for Murray as talent wise he should be close to at least 10 Grand Slams
Agreed, he actually has one of the most complete Tennis CVs ever. He's reached the final of every Masters and Grand Slam event final (monte carlo masters the exception), often multiple times. He's been world number 1 (before any of the GOATs retired) , won 2 olympic golds and a silver (none of the big 3 match this) and he's won the Davis cup and ATP finals. Of the two grand slams he never won - FO and AO, he did take a set lead in the final in each of them, not to mention all the other AO final losses he had to Djokovic. He peaked in late 2016 and was set to dominate 2017 before getting injured and he was never the same since. His career during 2010-2016 during the peak 'Big Four' years he was often the main challenger to Djokovic and out performed Federer in that time period too. Even conservatively if he'd won say 2 more slams, which is very possible without his Injury, that'd put him level with the likes of Becker and make it less arguable that he's not in the Top 10 players of all time.
This is the problem. Difference between being runner up in a slam and winning it is HUGE. No one really remembers the runner ups. Had Murray won a couple more slams he would be praised more highly. I think if he hadn’t got that career ending hip injury in 2017 he would be sitting on maybe 5/6 slams now.
How I miss Andy these past 5 years. Andy joining the Big 3 & yes he is number 4, he still became a major factor stirring the Big 3 up & yes for 7-8yrs it was the Big 4. It's over for him sadly & he's tried so hard & now probably too hard as he plays flat out every game & that tells on your body, stop going for these returns that you run a mile for, it's killing your body & hip & muscles.
Winning this marathon match and going further to what till this day is the longest and toughest gramdslam final match against Nadal is what cemented Djokovic as the goat. Heck he is the only player that eats grass, don't think that's by accident.
@@Marc-vk7rl Nadal was fresh, yes he had two tough matches against Berdych and Federer but they weren't 5 setters and he had one extra day to recover. He can't have been fine in 2009 but then be tired in 2012. You can't have it both ways.
@@sumnahlennon4516 the last two sets of this match was very one sided. Don't let this match being a 5 setter fool you. Nadal had it tougher in 2009 where all 5 sets in the SF were more tight.
novak is with the age 32 after Austrlaian open2020 more succesfull then federer and nadal with the age 32 Djokovic2020/Federer 2014/Nadal 2019 all with the age 32 after the australian open Grandslams=17/17/17 Big titles= 56/45/51 Weeks and nr.1=276/302/196 Titles= 78/77/80 novak is perfect in the timeline
That what federer could not do in his prime from 2004-10 against nadal on all sourfaces, that could djokovic only do in 10 months against nadal fro, indian wells 2011 until Australian open 2012...THATS WHY Novak has the highest level of all time
@@noahkhimasia6437 Dimitrov vs Murray. 😆😆😆. Lol. How about Nadal-Murray 2010 Australian Open Quarterfinal? I don't think it is on the level of Federer-Murray 2013 or Murray-Djokovic 2012 though mainly because Nadal retired when he was 2 sets and 3-0 down and Nadal had far less success at AO than Federer and Djokovic.
@@chamindujanith6337 also do you not think Murray played insane in that match vs Dimitrov? Ok yeah maybe not his best match but come on just watch the highlights!
@@noahkhimasia6437 Yeah. But there isn't really much of an appeal. It's not like Dimitrov ever came close to winning. And everybody expects Murray to win.
Murray was one of the best hardcourt players of his generation. Go and look at the head to head between him and Roger. He lead it for the majority of the time and it took a long time for Roger to catch up and overtake him. Murray was better than Roger on a hardcourt a lot of the time. And he beat Roger and Novak on grass. Pretty good hey.
Nothing wrong with his attitude. Always gives respect to his opponents and fans. Encourages younger players. He is the ONLY big player who is trying to financially help lower rank players by creating a system (PTPA). One of the true statesmen of all sports. Here him talk how well he articulates his views.
Fedalovic are equal no.1s making Andy no.2! To be up there & feeding of the same table as Fedalovic is respect. Warwinka did compete up there but really didn't better Andy & the rest was the rest. I'd rather have Andy's 5 finals than 1 final with a win. Rafa had 4 losing finals too, so Andy beats him on that!
Djokovic has in his era from 2011-16 a 41-19 H2h against federer and nadal... federer has in his era from 2004-10 a 21-20 H2h against djokovic and nadal.. THAT Is the different who is the real GOAT!!!!!
If Federer had played them 20 more times in that era (especially from 2004-2006), it could've been 41-20. Is it his fault they were too weak back then? Btw, in so called strong era 2008-2014 Djokovic (21-27 years - in his prime) won 7 GS titles and lost 6 finals, Federer (27-33) won 5 and lost 6 finals. What a huge difference!
@@sergius989 "Is it his fault they were too weak back then?" where was federer in the same age in the years 1998-2001???? When was djokovic and federer better with the age between 18-22 or 29-34? Of course both were better in the age between 29-34!!! Federer win in his era until 2010 australian open= 65%(80% by grandslam) matches against a 18-22 age djokovic... Djokovic win in his 2011-16 era= 65%(80% by grandslam) matches against a 29-34 age federer ::::Djokovic plays in his era against a much stronger version from federer, then federer in his era against djokovic ..... Djokovic would have against a 18-22 age federer a win percent from 100%.... even hewitt has a 7-2 h2h against a 18-22 age federer in the years between 1999-2003 Djokovic prime was with the age between 23-29 when he won 11 grandslams and not from 21-27, but i know federer fans deciding for everything, when was which player in his prime or what is the requirement for THE GOAT etc
@@travisbickle5279 Federer peak was 2015. He was playing hell of a tennis. Unfortunately for him Djokovic was in goat mode. Non Fed and Djokovic were in their prime at age of 25. They both push each other and improved with years. Unfortunately for Fed Djokovic is to intelligent and it helps him make better decisions in his career and develop more than Fed and Rafa. He is a goat. His return, backhand, game from base line, court coverage, agility, motivation, making decisions under pressure, holding concentration and mental toughness are remarkable. Even if he is represented as immature clown in media his tennis and mindset should be roll model for younger generation of players. Fed is able to produce some incredible points but he also have few weaknesses. He is not so good under pressure, his backhand looks nice but it is not so efficient and generally he is not at Djokovic and Rafa level from base line. That’s why he plays more aggressive. Aggressive game looks nice because it brings many winners but also brings unforced errors. Djokovic is like a wall from base line. He is so solid and well positioned on court. Absolute goat of tennis on grass and hard court. Rafa his goat of clay because clay neutralize his weakness. Fed will go down in history as nr1, Djokovic will go down as goat. But mark my words Dominic Thiem will become new wr nr1 in 2022. He and Djokovic will have some big wars in slams in next 2-3 years just like they had in AO 2020. To beat Djokovic in gs Thiem will need to hold concentration for 4-5 hours without dropping his level. If his tennis level will drop just for 5min Djokovic is ready to punish him. It will be also interesting to see if Djokovic will stay so confident and mental tough after 1-2 looses against Thiem in Gs finals. Fed is mentally strong but Djokovic was able to turn him from mental rock to mental midget
I’m a Federer fan and I used to defend Federer and do these type of arguments. I’ve since come to realize I was wrong. I think Novak is an all around better tennis player. Roger has always had weaknesses and inconsistencies in his game, that nadal and djokovic exposed starting in 2008. The Excuse is not that Federer was too old. Look at what lebron James is doing. The reality is that they became better than Federer. And the proof is in the results since 2008. They consistently outperformed him for the next 12 years. Being 21 or 23 or 27 or 31 doesn’t matter. What matters is who’s better.
Australian Open TV ....please better hd quality as the last stream nadal vs federer AO 2009, the youtube quality from this 2009 match before a couple days was unfortunately not to good. best regards from germany
The videos are uploaded in HD only, but the max resolution in mobile is capped at 480p [at least here in India]. You can watch the match in HD if you open RUclips on a computer, if you have one.
@@Laland_1196 anything could go either way..that’s the beauty of the sport but saying he deserves to lose all those tournaments is uncalled for.. he played his best like any other players, it’s just he’s more clutch and holds his nerve better.
@@Laland_1196 Yes, yes, you robbed him of two Grand Slams by kicking him out twice for no great reason. Not to mention the fact that in the first years of his career, he had problems with gluten, which caused him to narrowly lose matches. If it weren't for all that, Djokovic would be at least 25 grand slams today, if not 30.
I like Muray very much, he is an outstanding athlete but his biggest misfortune is that he played at the same time as the beast of winning and his injuries.Nole is a winner one of the greatest athletes history has ever seen
Andy's a pounder, he chases a ball & hits from seats Row 2 & judders to a stop putting immense strain on his hips. Fedalovic don't chase like Andy, they slide & don't bother with unreturnables in the main reason unless it's a vital. Still Andy's not done too bad with Slam finals & semis against 3 of the best ever players. He will retire this Wimbledon. It's humilitating going out in 2 rounds at ATP Tour events & Slams also & for a great player battling with a hip replacement.
As good as this match was, none of those present that day had the least idea that they were about to witness, a day or so after, the greatest final of all time🥇
He did though. I don't know if he was tired or a bit sick, but his body language was very flat (at least for the first two sets, I haven't seen it all yet). But obviously he's a fighter and he got through this and then beat Nadal. Gotta admire the toughness and persistence of top tennis players!
Even tho I know the result it's like I don't know the result as I'm rolling my eyes & saying "Andy you can win this.." & you spoilsports giving the result away too..
alcaraz maybe...rune or even sinner doesn't have the champion qualities Novak and Andy have. The big4 was undoubtedly among the most talented players of all time and they played in the same generation. In there early 20s they were all veterans at slams semis and finals playing 5 setters like a regular Tuesday.
2:05:44 the real reason the jwo doesn’t like djokovic: he is an ardent Christian. 3:51:48 what did he eat there? Whatever it was, he got a huge burst of energy after that :/ 3:54:09 they try a second look at it… still can’t tell …hmmm 4:38:36 announcers notice the change too
*Djokovic is much more gracious than Federer in terms of how he responds to the loses.* He always applauds nice opposites points congratulates and praises his opponent even in defeats during his interviews Federer doesn't have a bit of class, win or lose disdain for Djokovic is obvious. reason people call him classy is his looks, beautiful style of play. As a character he was often trashy.
@@mickaellandry9726 I said I'm Roger fan (I'm really) to avoid attacks from Roger fans as I rated Rafa above Roger in on-court attitude I basically enjoy watching all premier tennis players, but Roger at the top, next Nole, next Wawrinka, next Delpotro, next Rafa, and so on I keep getting disappointed with Nole's oncourt antics -- yelling at his box | staring at this box | cribbing when crowd boos | breaking racquets | the recent incident of linesperson hit on throat by ball thrown by Nole out of anger | ... Where is grace in such behaviors! I agree that he appreciates others' performances but these are professional players, and they don't really need appreciation. I agree it is good to appreciate. But more important is to avoid such antics. He is making himself less popular with such bizarre antics
@@madhukiranattivilli2321 are absolutely clueless about his attitude. It's not like he yells at his box all the time. How many matches of his have u watched since 2005? I bet not even 20%. And in how many matches have u seen him shouting at his box? And even if he does, it's no big deal. High level professional sports is demanding. Not everyone needs to act same. As for cribbing when crowd boos, no he doesn't crib. Bt it's disrespectful on part of crowd to act in this manner. Cheering on mistakes of a player is considered is not sportsmanship. Here is how attitude is: You are right. They are professional players. They don't need appreciation. What do they need? Financial security. Djokovic is the ONLY big player who is actually trying to help lower ranked players, financially by creating a system (PTPA). It doesn't help him at all. He does not have to. But he is trying to take on establishment. Talk about attitude when Federer or Nadal think about betterment of sport like Djokovic does. PS: you should see Federer' s attitude from 2011 onwards when he started losing GS regularly. Compare that to when he was winning all.
@@yogeshsingh4910 Thanks for writing in detail. I appreciate :) Player violent displays : Since big3 are the highest quality in tennis, I would like to see them transcend the emotional aspects so to play at an even higher level... good for them... good for the tennis fans. So, the comments on racquet smashes, staring at box, responding to crowd boos, etc is coming from this positive and optimistic angle. Crowd boos : Crowd is a group. So, we can't say crowd is wrong. We can say to a person or 1 or 2 people, how can we tell a crowd how to behave. Will never work, except for when legal rules are broken PTPA : Going against establishment never works. Novak aim is super positive. I appreciate. He spending on his own is good. He organizing a tennis event during covid time with his money to support low ranked players is a super gesture. But these are short term measures. The one and only way to improve quality of players finances both in ATP and WTA is to be soft with the bosses, massage their egos, use 100% non-violent approach i.e. no physical violent and no mental violence. Slow and steady soft discussions will definitely yield some results. When the bosses realize that their egos aren't stamped upon, and that their positions are not under threat, and when the players either directly or indirectly doesn't try to grab the lime light in the process of helping and offer unconditionally the complete credit to the bosses, I am sure good results will come. No boss would like to have bad relation with a big3 caliber mega star when things are done softly and professionally and diplomatically and patiently. I have no clue at all what contribution the big4 have done in this aspect, but I definitely support Roger and Rafa ways of dealing with the ATP and do not support Novak's PTPA. I works only in movies. No boss would like to bend their knee and head to pressures from another org like PTPA and give away money. No boss will ever accept such explicit loss of pride and power. When such situations arise, the bosses across sports will unite, as it's their playing field. Whether they are corrupt or not is secondary until proven, primary point is that those guys must have done a lot of hard work to reach such positions and will not allow external sources to intimidate them directly or indirectly. This is my sincere opinion about PTPA
Man people really overhype these terrible matches. 70 errors from novak and close to 90 for murray!!! Frankly that's embarassing no wonder fedal matches are classics compared to this shit. Even novak played like shit. There is nothing redeeamble about this match except maybe drama but even then we all know murray is and always will be a serial choker.
100% agree you have to start watching the match from the 5th set where you see both players both having a red hot crack at the same time instead of both walking around dejectedly most of the night showing horrible attitudes it’s not till the 5th set this match really comes alive and it becomes a classic
@@coreymalcolm3091 yeah I'm halfway and it just looks like neither of them want to be there. Poor standard of play, yet still an interesting match for that reason. I'll watch Fed v Rafa any day though ahead of these two!
![Australian Open 2013 R4 Djokovic vs Wawrinka Full match [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sA6FG-TlfkE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Australian Open 2013 R4 Djokovic vs Wawrinka Full match [HD]](/img/tr.png)
he played 4h 50 min in the semi final then 5hs 53 mins in the final. 10hs and 43 min in 2 game. Nole rlly is immortal
and if there was an ultra final he would play 9hrs and beat Federer. Thats the level of mentality that he is on.
@@ib6294e's favourite for Wimbledon & no one can beat him as the new kids have yet to make their mark on the green stuff. You never know maybe Andy might get drawn together.
@@seltaeb3302 funnier things have happened on tennis court..more so on grass.
Even Djokovic won't be thinking dt he is unbeatable
@@ib62942019 Wimbledon
At the highest level. The stress physically and mentally.
Djokovic would go on to win that epic final against Nadal afterwards. Incredible!
@define crazy It wasnt tought like this one
Yo soi maestro de tenis y megusta mucho ber los partidos de tenis todos los kepuedo ber megusta
@define crazy That is true, but this one was something else
its like how nadal won that 2009 semi-final against verdasco and then go on to beat roger. amazing stuff in AO
Thanks for ruining the result for everyone before watching....
It was the Big 4 that made the semis in the AO that year. What a tournament!
there's no big 4 and never has been. Murray is a joke
@@PretentiousStuff Murray is not a Joke Lol.. He is easily the 4th best player after Fed,Nadal,Djoker..
@@PretentiousStuff Without Murray the Big 3 would have become a closed shop. They feared Murray & your statement bears no reality to the impact Andy made. He is respected greatly by tennis players & even with a metal hip can give us the 2 best matches of AO 2023.
There is no big 4 and never has been. Only big 3. Fed/Nad/Mur. The🐐 is above them all.
@@aranighosh3945Djokovic 🐐
Murray is not big 4
Commentators said that if novak loses the second set then he is going to lose the match because he is tired. How wrong were the commentators! Not only he won this mach but also he went on to win final with Nadal which was played over five hours
we saw that day how Nadal could no longer hold on his legs, face expression was begging for the match to end.but we still saw a physical freshness in Nole, who had 5 hours before the match in his legs. what an athlete!
Best djokovic murray match
Too many of them which makes it hard to pick..
Absolutely
Much more fun than the US Open final in 2012
Best grand slam match I think rome semi and Shanghai final were sick
I love how the announcers question Djokovic’s fitness and then he wins back to back 5hr long 5 set matches
Those guys are clowns
That's because he's doping. Look at him from set 3 onwards. Hiding and eating stuff under his towel.
Anyone can win 5 hour matches after doping. No biggie.
@@NishanBhatta275take an L, thats not how drugs work
@@NishanBhatta275tell me you're a clown w/o telling me you're a clown 🤡
@@NamTran-xc2ip you seem to know a lot. You Djoko’s dealer?
After struggle vs Andy, Novak winn in epic battle against Rafa. Playing nearly 11 hour's! "Man of steel"🏆
Nadal did the same in 2009 against a more difficult opponent Verdasco
@@adithyanaren519 Verdasco more difficult than Murray? hahahahah
@@adithyanaren519 indian boy you comparing verdasco with prime murray do you have any idea other than shitting on streets?
@@adithyanaren519 see comparison is not comparison.
@@adithyanaren519 nadal noob
There is some sort of magic seeing these two play, just like when Nadal and Fed play together.
I absolutely love how Murray went for his forehand in this match, just pummelled it every time! This match was the start of something big for Murray. Djokovic is so tough to beat on this court.
Murray made the Wimbledon final this year (lost to Federer) and win the Olympic gold medal this year (got revenge on Federer) and then won the US Open this year (got revenge on Djokovic for this match)
Murray played probably one of his best matches of all time and still came up short. Just goes to show how good Djokovic was in that tournament. Unbeatable.
This is the match where i KNEW murray would win a slam, looks even better when u think of the epic novak and rafa put on just hours later, novak is an animal
5 losing AO finals is better somehow than only having 1 final that he wins. He should get a special medal made for him.
Coverage starts with questions about Novak's fitness. He then plays 11 hours of tennis in two matches, to win another title.
Seriously how fucking good is Novak djokovic.
Watch the match with a focus on his defense, his hands, his touch, his flexibility, his tenacity, his mental strength.
He’s truly the greatest competitor in the history of tennis, with Nadal a very very close second.
Djoker up with another epic 2 days later. A gladiator
We are grateful if you could upload 2020 Final and SF full matches
Commentators are saying in the first set itself that novak looks exhausted. They also said that he looked tired against Hewitt and David Ferer. What is the end result? Novak went on to win this semifinal as well as longest AO final against Nadal. How wrong were the commentators? Brad gilbert predicted Murray to win in four sets against novak in 2011 final. What happened? These commentators are also biased like the crowd
Yeah I can’t believe the commentators get sucked into Djokovic’s antics he always acts tired gets his opponents into a false sense of security then ups his level and destroys them
Dude these commentators we're awful. Playing defensive is not the same as being exhausted. Hitting the ball deep is not the same as doing nothing with the ball. Novak won the longest slam final right after this match. Really bad
Djokovic was bending over and walking gingerly after for so much of the 2nd & 3rd set. It's natural that they thought he was tired.
it's the sad reality that Djokovic was not in the tennis watchers' plan. meme The commentators predicted the doomsday.
@@coreymalcolm3091losers always cry after the loss, cry like a river 😭😭😭
4:53:20 that rally in the 5th set, at 5:5 and 30 : 40 was so crucial...Murray was so good in that rally...should have risked a little bit more
Yep - he played the point pretty well but Djokovic wasn’t going to hand him the break. Like you said - Murray should’ve pulled the trigger. His forehand and backhand were absolute fire in that match.
Rod Laver look very happy everytime when djoko wins , of course im sarcastic they dont like the goatovic but right now they all behind him
People forget just how good prime Murray was... he was number 2 not number 4(which people seem to remember him as) He beat Djokovic on center court in a Wimbledon final which is something Federer didn't do... and he pushed Novak to the brink here in Australia... he was a beast
I started watching tennis in 2010 where I became a Novak fan (I know sounds like a bandwagon fan who is trying to emphasize that I came in before 2011 but it's actually true) so I remember these days like it was yesterday because it was then where my love for the sport started...Murray was a huge player in those years and it felt like it was him and Djokovic trying to break into the vice grip like lock 🔒 that Fedal had(especially with fans and commentators) I'm kind of sad seeing how it panned out for Murray as talent wise he should be close to at least 10 Grand Slams
Agreed, he actually has one of the most complete Tennis CVs ever. He's reached the final of every Masters and Grand Slam event final (monte carlo masters the exception), often multiple times. He's been world number 1 (before any of the GOATs retired) , won 2 olympic golds and a silver (none of the big 3 match this) and he's won the Davis cup and ATP finals. Of the two grand slams he never won - FO and AO, he did take a set lead in the final in each of them, not to mention all the other AO final losses he had to Djokovic. He peaked in late 2016 and was set to dominate 2017 before getting injured and he was never the same since. His career during 2010-2016 during the peak 'Big Four' years he was often the main challenger to Djokovic and out performed Federer in that time period too. Even conservatively if he'd won say 2 more slams, which is very possible without his Injury, that'd put him level with the likes of Becker and make it less arguable that he's not in the Top 10 players of all time.
This is the problem. Difference between being runner up in a slam and winning it is HUGE. No one really remembers the runner ups. Had Murray won a couple more slams he would be praised more highly. I think if he hadn’t got that career ending hip injury in 2017 he would be sitting on maybe 5/6 slams now.
If Murray took a break from Nole at 2/2 5-5, 15-40, Then he's life will be so different
Djokovic was taking so long in between points Murray actually actually drank from his bottle of sport drink between points behind the baseline 😂
AO 2012 is probably the best tennis tournament ever. Insane matches
How I miss Andy these past 5 years. Andy joining the Big 3 & yes he is number 4, he still became a major factor stirring the Big 3 up & yes for 7-8yrs it was the Big 4. It's over for him sadly & he's tried so hard & now probably too hard as he plays flat out every game & that tells on your body, stop going for these returns that you run a mile for, it's killing your body & hip & muscles.
Winning this marathon match and going further to what till this day is the longest and toughest gramdslam final match against Nadal is what cemented Djokovic as the goat.
Heck he is the only player that eats grass, don't think that's by accident.
Nadal played 2 4-hr matches in QF and semis against Berdych and Federer. It is not like he was fit in the final
@@Marc-vk7rl Nadal was fresh, yes he had two tough matches against Berdych and Federer but they weren't 5 setters and he had one extra day to recover. He can't have been fine in 2009 but then be tired in 2012. You can't have it both ways.
@@sumnahlennon4516 the last two sets of this match was very one sided. Don't let this match being a 5 setter fool you. Nadal had it tougher in 2009 where all 5 sets in the SF were more tight.
@@aranighosh3945in terms of time, Djokovic spent more hours
novak is with the age 32 after Austrlaian open2020 more succesfull then federer and nadal with the age 32
Djokovic2020/Federer 2014/Nadal 2019 all with the age 32 after the australian open
Grandslams=17/17/17
Big titles= 56/45/51
Weeks and nr.1=276/302/196
Titles= 78/77/80
novak is perfect in the timeline
@Ryo Shusuke Let’s see if federer can win a slam with the age 19-20;).
Amazing return winner by djokovic
What a match. As a Murray fan, it took me a long time to get over the 5-5 game in the final set.
4:50:44 that ball is undoubtably in
Underrated match
That what federer could not do in his prime from 2004-10 against nadal on all sourfaces, that could djokovic only do in 10 months against nadal fro, indian wells 2011 until Australian open 2012...THATS WHY Novak has the highest level of all time
@Kartik Guptai think my english is to bad for that
In that same time federer defeated Djokovic in FO
@@AdhiNarayananYR murray also defeat him so what does that make him better than nole
That red adidas shirt of Murray's was fire
Best ever Andy Murray Australian Open performance right here.
I think it’s either this or Murray vs Federer 2013 semi final, or maybe even Murray vs Dimitrov 2015 fourth round.
@@noahkhimasia6437 Dimitrov vs Murray. 😆😆😆. Lol. How about Nadal-Murray 2010 Australian Open Quarterfinal? I don't think it is on the level of Federer-Murray 2013 or Murray-Djokovic 2012 though mainly because Nadal retired when he was 2 sets and 3-0 down and Nadal had far less success at AO than Federer and Djokovic.
@@chamindujanith6337 yeah that was a great performance from Murray but yeah I don’t think it’s as good since Nadal was probably not playing his best.
@@chamindujanith6337 also do you not think Murray played insane in that match vs Dimitrov? Ok yeah maybe not his best match but come on just watch the highlights!
@@noahkhimasia6437 Yeah. But there isn't really much of an appeal. It's not like Dimitrov ever came close to winning. And everybody expects Murray to win.
Murray was one of the best hardcourt players of his generation. Go and look at the head to head between him and Roger. He lead it for the majority of the time and it took a long time for Roger to catch up and overtake him. Murray was better than Roger on a hardcourt a lot of the time. And he beat Roger and Novak on grass. Pretty good hey.
And then he won the final in the longest final ever. Who’s the goat? 😉
Novak od course!
Maybe not likes his actitud but he is like player a MONSTER
Nothing wrong with his attitude.
Always gives respect to his opponents and fans.
Encourages younger players.
He is the ONLY big player who is trying to financially help lower rank players by creating a system (PTPA).
One of the true statesmen of all sports. Here him talk how well he articulates his views.
two tennis players who played such demanding and difficult tennis matches That Endj, Forced his body with hard games. Especially the two of them
Hola. Sol Rene gomes para mi este fue uno delos megore partidos de todos lostienpos
3:32:49 I love this reaction
The Man of Steel :: Novak Djokovic
This is honestly a better match than the final.
Fedalovic are equal no.1s making Andy no.2! To be up there & feeding of the same table as Fedalovic is respect. Warwinka did compete up there but really didn't better Andy & the rest was the rest. I'd rather have Andy's 5 finals than 1 final with a win. Rafa had 4 losing finals too, so Andy beats him on that!
4:00:17 Fifth set begins
10:42 Murray try hit the serve on djokovic s body:)
Djokovic has in his era from 2011-16 a 41-19 H2h against federer and nadal...
federer has in his era from 2004-10 a 21-20 H2h against djokovic and nadal..
THAT Is the different who is the real GOAT!!!!!
If Federer had played them 20 more times in that era (especially from 2004-2006), it could've been 41-20. Is it his fault they were too weak back then? Btw, in so called strong era 2008-2014 Djokovic (21-27 years - in his prime) won 7 GS titles and lost 6 finals, Federer (27-33) won 5 and lost 6 finals. What a huge difference!
@@sergius989 "Is it his fault they were too weak back then?" where was federer in the same age in the years 1998-2001????
When was djokovic and federer better with the age between 18-22 or 29-34? Of course both were better in the age between 29-34!!!
Federer win in his era until 2010 australian open= 65%(80% by grandslam) matches against a 18-22 age djokovic... Djokovic win in his 2011-16 era= 65%(80% by grandslam) matches against a 29-34 age federer ::::Djokovic plays in his era against a much stronger version from federer, then federer in his era against djokovic .....
Djokovic would have against a 18-22 age federer a win percent from 100%....
even hewitt has a 7-2 h2h against a 18-22 age federer in the years between 1999-2003
Djokovic prime was with the age between 23-29 when he won 11 grandslams and not from 21-27, but i know federer fans deciding for everything, when was which player in his prime or what is the requirement for THE GOAT etc
@@travisbickle5279 Federer peak was 2015. He was playing hell of a tennis. Unfortunately for him Djokovic was in goat mode. Non Fed and Djokovic were in their prime at age of 25. They both push each other and improved with years. Unfortunately for Fed Djokovic is to intelligent and it helps him make better decisions in his career and develop more than Fed and Rafa. He is a goat. His return, backhand, game from base line, court coverage, agility, motivation, making decisions under pressure, holding concentration and mental toughness are remarkable. Even if he is represented as immature clown in media his tennis and mindset should be roll model for younger generation of players. Fed is able to produce some incredible points but he also have few weaknesses. He is not so good under pressure, his backhand looks nice but it is not so efficient and generally he is not at Djokovic and Rafa level from base line. That’s why he plays more aggressive. Aggressive game looks nice because it brings many winners but also brings unforced errors. Djokovic is like a wall from base line. He is so solid and well positioned on court. Absolute goat of tennis on grass and hard court. Rafa his goat of clay because clay neutralize his weakness. Fed will go down in history as nr1, Djokovic will go down as goat. But mark my words Dominic Thiem will become new wr nr1 in 2022. He and Djokovic will have some big wars in slams in next 2-3 years just like they had in AO 2020. To beat Djokovic in gs Thiem will need to hold concentration for 4-5 hours without dropping his level. If his tennis level will drop just for 5min Djokovic is ready to punish him. It will be also interesting to see if Djokovic will stay so confident and mental tough after 1-2 looses against Thiem in Gs finals. Fed is mentally strong but Djokovic was able to turn him from mental rock to mental midget
Fed will homeowners in history as nr3*
I’m a Federer fan and I used to defend Federer and do these type of arguments.
I’ve since come to realize I was wrong.
I think Novak is an all around better tennis player.
Roger has always had weaknesses and inconsistencies in his game, that nadal and djokovic exposed starting in 2008.
The Excuse is not that Federer was too old. Look at what lebron James is doing. The reality is that they became better than Federer. And the proof is in the results since 2008. They consistently outperformed him for the next 12 years. Being 21 or 23 or 27 or 31 doesn’t matter. What matters is who’s better.
The man of steal, Nole !
Australian Open TV
....please better hd quality as the last stream nadal vs federer AO 2009, the youtube quality from this 2009 match before a couple days was unfortunately not to good.
best regards from germany
The videos are uploaded in HD only, but the max resolution in mobile is capped at 480p [at least here in India]. You can watch the match in HD if you open RUclips on a computer, if you have one.
How he won this match and then went on to win the final versus freaking Rafael Nadal in 6 hours is still a mystery :)
Rafa won against Verdasco and Roger in back to back 5 sets too in 2009.
@@Laland_1196 cry harder 😭😭🤣🤣
@@aranighosh3945 that’s why their strength and stamina are unmatched 🙌🏼
@@Laland_1196 anything could go either way..that’s the beauty of the sport but saying he deserves to lose all those tournaments is uncalled for.. he played his best like any other players, it’s just he’s more clutch and holds his nerve better.
@@Laland_1196 Yes, yes, you robbed him of two Grand Slams by kicking him out twice for no great reason. Not to mention the fact that in the first years of his career, he had problems with gluten, which caused him to narrowly lose matches. If it weren't for all that, Djokovic would be at least 25 grand slams today, if not 30.
Why is the commentary only in the left audio channel?
Andy made 11 GS finals and must be around 20 semis. What a career!❤
Djokovic GOAT
Murray was a beast, a stubborn Scotsman and one of the best returners.
НОВАК ТЫ ЛУЧШИЙ !!!
I like Muray very much, he is an outstanding athlete but his biggest misfortune is that he played at the same time as the beast of winning and his injuries.Nole is a winner one of the greatest athletes history has ever seen
Epic battle two great warrior ⚔🤜💥🤛
سلام عليكم ورحمة لله وبركاته
تحياتي
إنهم رائعون
Novak 👍👍👍
@ 4:07:53 there's a bug just crawling behind Djokovic LMAO
Everyone talks about the final, for good reasons, but this match was equally great in my opinion.
just because it wasn't the final
The Final was the greatest tennis match of all time
@@kenandjoker4857 For me that's still the 2008 Wimbledon final, but 2012 AO final is up there for sure.
@@Vaisin
Djokovic vs KevinAnderson 2018 final at Wimbledon was the best ever.
Surely I'm joking.....
Yeah I think I am.
These types of matches shortened Andy's career
Andy's a pounder, he chases a ball & hits from seats Row 2 & judders to a stop putting immense strain on his hips. Fedalovic don't chase like Andy, they slide & don't bother with unreturnables in the main reason unless it's a vital. Still Andy's not done too bad with Slam finals & semis against 3 of the best ever players. He will retire this Wimbledon. It's humilitating going out in 2 rounds at ATP Tour events & Slams also & for a great player battling with a hip replacement.
One of the better matches, bravo Nole 🐐❤️
1:02:08 2nd set
O my goat!
As good as this match was, none of those present that day had the least idea that they were about to witness, a day or so after, the greatest final of all time🥇
Andy Murray is Theon Grayjoy, change my mind
Novak Djokovic , the greatest of all time 🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐🐐
the commentators should appreciate the game more
The year before I was born.
Finished watching in 1 min
Somebody please tell me the name of the commentator Peter.
I really love his commentary.
Peter Donegan
@@surajmachale9414 thanks
1:12:39 and 2:19:47 are the challenges that really close outside the base line, so unlucky to Murray.
Especially since those challenges could have come in handy in that final game.
42:40 Commentator: "He (Djokovic) just looks like a tired man, worrying signs." funny to hear in hindsight :P
He did though. I don't know if he was tired or a bit sick, but his body language was very flat (at least for the first two sets, I haven't seen it all yet).
But obviously he's a fighter and he got through this and then beat Nadal. Gotta admire the toughness and persistence of top tennis players!
the only time I've ever seen Novak wearing Sergio Teccini
Djokovic always return the ball to her opponent on the 2nd set
The commentary has been so ass throughout the 1st set
Even tho I know the result it's like I don't know the result as I'm rolling my eyes & saying "Andy you can win this.." & you spoilsports giving the result away too..
Come on Andyyy!!!
This is Alcaraz and Rune in like 3 years.
Nah Alcaraz cant play these long rallies, he Go for all or nothing
@@SebastianSaavedra28
He is slowly changing that
Sinner
alcaraz maybe...rune or even sinner doesn't have the champion qualities Novak and Andy have. The big4 was undoubtedly among the most talented players of all time and they played in the same generation. In there early 20s they were all veterans at slams semis and finals playing 5 setters like a regular Tuesday.
It really was a choke by Andy, 3 break points at 5-5, 5 unforced errors on Bp or deuces only at that game
Novak was 5-2 up remember
Joker 🃏 Nole the Best
2:05:44 the real reason the jwo doesn’t like djokovic: he is an ardent Christian. 3:51:48 what did he eat there? Whatever it was, he got a huge burst of energy after that :/ 3:54:09 they try a second look at it… still can’t tell …hmmm 4:38:36 announcers notice the change too
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
5:04:32
same butterfly with him in AO 21 and also in the semis, just crazy.
A battle not just of tennis but of babe girlfriends. Just look at them. My goodness.
Now with Corona, Djokovic will have a massive advantage... NO SPECTATORS, no one to hate him anymore
he played better with hate in the crowd
TennisLove TRUE
This didn't age well
0:30 tennis is such a lonely sport
I'm Roger fan. Have seen many matches among the Big 4. I feel Rafa has the best attitude among big 4, next Roger, next Andy, last Djoker. @2:39:00
I think Novak is far better than Andy in attitude
*Djokovic is much more gracious than Federer in terms of how he responds to the loses.* He always applauds nice opposites points congratulates and praises his opponent even in defeats during his interviews
Federer doesn't have a bit of class, win or lose disdain for Djokovic is obvious. reason people call him classy is his looks, beautiful style of play. As a character he was often trashy.
@@mickaellandry9726 I said I'm Roger fan (I'm really) to avoid attacks from Roger fans as I rated Rafa above Roger in on-court attitude
I basically enjoy watching all premier tennis players, but Roger at the top, next Nole, next Wawrinka, next Delpotro, next Rafa, and so on
I keep getting disappointed with Nole's oncourt antics -- yelling at his box | staring at this box | cribbing when crowd boos | breaking racquets | the recent incident of linesperson hit on throat by ball thrown by Nole out of anger | ...
Where is grace in such behaviors!
I agree that he appreciates others' performances but these are professional players, and they don't really need appreciation. I agree it is good to appreciate. But more important is to avoid such antics. He is making himself less popular with such bizarre antics
@@madhukiranattivilli2321 are absolutely clueless about his attitude.
It's not like he yells at his box all the time. How many matches of his have u watched since 2005? I bet not even 20%.
And in how many matches have u seen him shouting at his box?
And even if he does, it's no big deal. High level professional sports is demanding. Not everyone needs to act same.
As for cribbing when crowd boos, no he doesn't crib. Bt it's disrespectful on part of crowd to act in this manner. Cheering on mistakes of a player is considered is not sportsmanship.
Here is how attitude is:
You are right. They are professional players. They don't need appreciation. What do they need?
Financial security.
Djokovic is the ONLY big player who is actually trying to help lower ranked players, financially by creating a system (PTPA). It doesn't help him at all. He does not have to. But he is trying to take on establishment.
Talk about attitude when Federer or Nadal think about betterment of sport like Djokovic does.
PS: you should see Federer' s attitude from 2011 onwards when he started losing GS regularly. Compare that to when he was winning all.
@@yogeshsingh4910 Thanks for writing in detail. I appreciate :)
Player violent displays :
Since big3 are the highest quality in tennis, I would like to see them transcend the emotional aspects so to play at an even higher level... good for them... good for the tennis fans. So, the comments on racquet smashes, staring at box, responding to crowd boos, etc is coming from this positive and optimistic angle.
Crowd boos :
Crowd is a group. So, we can't say crowd is wrong. We can say to a person or 1 or 2 people, how can we tell a crowd how to behave. Will never work, except for when legal rules are broken
PTPA :
Going against establishment never works. Novak aim is super positive. I appreciate. He spending on his own is good. He organizing a tennis event during covid time with his money to support low ranked players is a super gesture. But these are short term measures. The one and only way to improve quality of players finances both in ATP and WTA is to be soft with the bosses, massage their egos, use 100% non-violent approach i.e. no physical violent and no mental violence. Slow and steady soft discussions will definitely yield some results. When the bosses realize that their egos aren't stamped upon, and that their positions are not under threat, and when the players either directly or indirectly doesn't try to grab the lime light in the process of helping and offer unconditionally the complete credit to the bosses, I am sure good results will come. No boss would like to have bad relation with a big3 caliber mega star when things are done softly and professionally and diplomatically and patiently. I have no clue at all what contribution the big4 have done in this aspect, but I definitely support Roger and Rafa ways of dealing with the ATP and do not support Novak's PTPA. I works only in movies. No boss would like to bend their knee and head to pressures from another org like PTPA and give away money. No boss will ever accept such explicit loss of pride and power. When such situations arise, the bosses across sports will unite, as it's their playing field. Whether they are corrupt or not is secondary until proven, primary point is that those guys must have done a lot of hard work to reach such positions and will not allow external sources to intimidate them directly or indirectly. This is my sincere opinion about PTPA
Vlade Divac Balkan Boy
Commentators were very biased against Novak 😒
Novak pretending to be hurt/tired at the end of the 2nd set is classic Novak tactics
Yea, he pretend to win 22 grand slams. ahahahahahha... jealousy is poison for soul
ｊ
0:30 tennis is such an anti social sport
Man people really overhype these terrible matches. 70 errors from novak and close to 90 for murray!!! Frankly that's embarassing no wonder fedal matches are classics compared to this shit. Even novak played like shit. There is nothing redeeamble about this match except maybe drama but even then we all know murray is and always will be a serial choker.
100% agree you have to start watching the match from the 5th set where you see both players both having a red hot crack at the same time instead of both walking around dejectedly most of the night showing horrible attitudes it’s not till the 5th set this match really comes alive and it becomes a classic
@@coreymalcolm3091 yeah I'm halfway and it just looks like neither of them want to be there. Poor standard of play, yet still an interesting match for that reason. I'll watch Fed v Rafa any day though ahead of these two!
It was always a great feeling when he smashed Nadal or Federer, but it was something special when he smashed that snob Murray..
aus open is Novak home
5:10:50
5:03:36
4:26:00