The Blackhawks 2016 Stadium Series jersey is by far better than the 2014 with the chrome logo. The Reverse Retro 1.0 was very underrated in the 1.0 Series. last year Jamie Faulkner and Dany Wirtz said on the CHGO podcast there was 3 choices and choose from it. The Reverse Retro 2.0 is definitely is the worst Blackhawks jersey all time.
If any of us had that stadium series one, it might have made the list. But, none of us hate the black alt, and it's just the black alt with some Picasso cubist elements lol
@uglythirds the black is great it's my favorite all time jersey but Reebok really screw it up with how they made it for the 2014 stadium series. I am glad in a couple the black 3rd will officially be coming back.
The reason i think the logo is not there because its a Native American figure. With the 2.0, Im guessing the opted for “Chicago” text on the front because they were scared lol
That's absolutely why. Like we showed, RR1 never got shown for that reason. But what a great opportunity to use the Tomahawk C front and center that they completely botched
Seeing that thumbnail i gotta say that i disagree with you guys there if anything it's a criminally underrated jersey that should become a alternate for the team
It's the context of it. The jersey is fine. Good even. But the logo...there's a reason the NHL never showed the front of the jersey in promotional materials
The Blackhawks 2016 Stadium Series jersey is by far better than the 2014 with the chrome logo. The Reverse Retro 1.0 was very underrated in the 1.0 Series. last year Jamie Faulkner and Dany Wirtz said on the CHGO podcast there was 3 choices and choose from it. The Reverse Retro 2.0 is definitely is the worst Blackhawks jersey all time.
If any of us had that stadium series one, it might have made the list. But, none of us hate the black alt, and it's just the black alt with some Picasso cubist elements lol
@uglythirds the black is great it's my favorite all time jersey but Reebok really screw it up with how they made it for the 2014 stadium series. I am glad in a couple the black 3rd will officially be coming back.
Stadium series one is the worst to me. It was in a time frame where they like outdoor games 3 years in a row and 2 looked fairly similar
They were super similar
Beside the logo, the RR isn’t all that bad. I like the design. Agree 100% with the rest of the list.
It really isn't a bad JERSEY, but the logo was a truly terrible decision
That is a clever way to get a new hat.
No offensive gents but this take is terrible cuz the RR1 and Stadium Series were actually good designs.
I'm all ears on what is worse. Genuinely, this was a really tough list to put together
Kudos to the Oilers! Boo Black Hawks security!
The reason i think the logo is not there because its a Native American figure. With the 2.0, Im guessing the opted for “Chicago” text on the front because they were scared lol
Complete pussy move from the hawks they would've struck gold with the original logo
That's absolutely why. Like we showed, RR1 never got shown for that reason. But what a great opportunity to use the Tomahawk C front and center that they completely botched
@@uglythirds word if that logo was on it I would've had bought this rr 2.0 by now
@@uglythirdscan’t believe that has never crossed my mind
Then just use the crossed tomahawks on the front. That would have rocked. The city name is so weak and pathetic.
Hawks main jerseys are so good if they use anything else people lose their minds.
They used to be. Until they were stained with some ridiculous sportsbook.
Seeing that thumbnail i gotta say that i disagree with you guys there if anything it's a criminally underrated jersey that should become a alternate for the team
It's the context of it. The jersey is fine. Good even. But the logo...there's a reason the NHL never showed the front of the jersey in promotional materials
I liked it too.