🤔Are EV battery fires the biggest threat to the electric revolution? 👉Why EV Owners Are Furious? Electric Vehicle Crisis: Owners Demand Answers as Battery Fires Surge! WATCH IT NOW HERE! 🎬ruclips.net/video/Xl3iac9pdlM/видео.html
@@PistonPundit No it's not battery fires it's the stone cold fact that EVs are no improvement on ICEs on any aspect except for one which is blistering acceleration. Worse on range, worse on reliability, need constant updates for bug fixes (BUG FIXES on cars allowed out on the roads FFS😲), are hopeless on heavy loads or towing, worse in any weather conditions that are outside the sweet spot, offensively expensive even with gazillions of £$€ in subsidies, depreciate quicker than a pint of milk left out in the sun for a week, poorer quality builds. I'm getting bored with the EVangelists lying about how they save the planet when the reverse is so blatantly true that it shouldn't need saying. If you enjoy your EV then good luck to you but some of us carry real loads and travel real distances and for that we need real cars
your right but when they are no good perhaps there is a safe place for now to save them safe but after a while run out of room also the break down of them what will happen to the soil plants will die as well around the safe place
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face. Forever. The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one: Don't let it happen, it depends on you."- George Orwell.
EV's have tailpipes too. At open pit mines for the batteries, at your charging station, and when the battery ends it's life it must be recycled carefully which requires fossil fuels too. So EV's, {Battery Cars} have 3 tailpipes, but you just can't see them,,,,,,,,,,,They are not zero carbon emitting cars either,,,,,,,,
Cradle to grave, EVs and the infrastructures critical to allow them to function, are far more environmentally hostile to environment, habitat and CO2 emissions than ICEs can ever be. And that's assuming that every EV is only powered by only renewables over the life of the vehicle which none of them are. That's not even including the emissions produced by manufacturing and transporting the assets required to generate renewable electricity (solar or wind or tidal) nor the emissions from moving vehicles components or everything involved in generating renewable electricity, every bit of which is moved round the globe powered by OIL.
These points are spot on. Governments & short sighted politicians have blundered their way through this transition. It's a shame that the outlook could have been so different with a more far sighted approach.
No, it was always going to look something like this because the Battery is THE Point Failure Source for anything that uses batteries. Why do you think that everything small they make the battery easy to change out?
@robertkubrick3738 Your comment needs more explanation. Please explain why failure of politicians to start the process of infrastructure change early or cause a more integrated/gradual approach is related to small batteries?
@@enquiringmind4356 The battery is the point failure source. I said nothing about infrastructure or gradual changes. The battery alone was going to make all the problems. Worrying about the rest of it is like worrying about the lipstick on a pig. If batteries were twice as good, (not in the next 100 years) the infrastructure problem would only be half as large but still too large. The Battery is always the problem.
Electric vehicles here in the UK are unaffordable for the average working class person, public charging is extremely expensive, not everyone uses credit cards, I'm an older person, I use an old Nokia phone, it's simple to use, it makes and receives calls, what a phone is designed for, it still works, it doesn't need replacing, I've always paid for fuel with cash, can't do that with electricity chargers, you don't know how much it costs or what you've spent until you receive the credit card bill, then there's the lack of infrastructure, the cities have the infrastructure whilst many towns don't, the cars themselves, they have advanced so much, but they have eliminated dashboards in favour of screens, again, being older, I don't understand screens, I understand that they are cheaper to produce, but it's all designed for the young and wealthy people not older people like myself, and with not knowing how much a unit of electricity costs on public chargers and how much you've spent, I'd be frightened of the thought of running up huge credit card debts, as it stands, paying with cash, I know what I have in my pocket is the limit of what I can spend, that's the way I work, I was left to pay my family's debts, that took years to clear, I've never borrowed from anywhere or run up any personal debt and I'm not going to start now
If we all lived like that prices would be lower. I live that way for the greatest part. I have paid off people's debts and they are back in debt in no time. There is no disconnect between desire and buy for them.
People who ascribe some deep purpose to politicians' desire to force everyone into EVs are being overly generous. The real reason they're so enthusiastic isn't some high-minded ideology, it's money, just like everything else they do. They receive massive amounts of money in exchange for their support and like elites everywhere, they don't care what damage they do in the process as long as they get rich. It's the stupid little soldiers with blogs and RUclips channels, and the even stupider grunts in the streets that are motivated by ideology. That's why ideology exists, to turn people into tools so that the elites can use them to further their own interests. That's true of all ideology, incidentally, not just the other guy's. Stop trying to get your answers out of a book, life doesn't come with an instruction manual.
They are huge and you are sitting on a bomb from 16 i have been into RC boats yachts cars i soon learned DO NOT put spare batter boxes in pocket ha ha ha i put some change in same pockets woosh I was ripping my genes OFF I was on fire yes I was a fool but young a car that runs on batteries is bomb.
The one thing we overlook with EVs is forest destruction. If you think EVs have nothing to do with forest destruction, well, think again. By law, every EV battery must be packed in a suitable container for transportation. That container is usually made from wood and is the size of a large refrigerator. So, if they manufacture 1 million batteries, they will also have to manufacture 1 million wooden boxes the size of a large refrigerator and that means a lot of trees have to be felled to do so. Some containers are made from plastic but then there is the pollution to manufacture thousands of large plastic boxes. Also, a considerable amount of plastic packaging must be produced to line the boxes.
FTGJ 66% of oil used in transportation sector. Most of chemical products (plastics, hydrogen for fertilizers etc) are much cheaper to make from natural gas.
@@antontsau You can't make a battery car without a veritable lake of oil for each one. I dare you to make a battery car from wood and unicorn plastic in your back yard.
@@antontsau So you think the mining equipment, trucks, ships used to get the materials and move them to where they can be processed then move the refined materials to where the components are manufactured the the components moved to where cars are assembled then the cars moved to ships and the ships offloading them in destination country where they are loaded on trucks to be delivered doesn't require oil? You think it all runs off natural gas? Fine then, use your own natural gas in your back yard to make the plastics and chemical soup in the battery cells plus the insulator inside the cells. Then when you are done, don't drive on any roads that needed diesel vehicles to construct, which would be all but dirt trails.
@robertkubrick3738 its nothing. 300000 tonn ship transporting all this (oil, cars, parts, ore, grain...) to the other side of the planet consumes 1000 tonn of lowgrade fuel - 0.3%. 30 tonn tanker truck consumes 100L for the whole trip to petrol station and back, container truck consumes 300L for 1000km trip with 40t of cargo and so on. Only aviation consumes fuel comparable to load, yes - flight is expensive, so no one carries bulk cheap raw materials by planes (except our beloved govt, of course), its for expensive goods and rich passengers only. Oil is VERY energy capable, its the reason why world uses it. It was energy effective even when was delivered by steam locos and steam ships all over the world. Even 2000 years ago it made sense to deliver grain, olive oil and fish by sea, ancient Greeks travelled with these goods all over Mediterranian.
There are no benefits. The fact that some of the materials in batteries are already in short supply means there is a limit to the production life of Ev’s
EV's are much worse for the environment than ice cars,not only that wind and solar energy is very bad for the environment also. Then CO2 is essential for a healthy planet.
The CO2 content in the atmosphere increased by 0.01% in the last 50 years. Out of it, 10% is due to human activity, and 90% is due to Sun activity. So, an increase of 0.001 % in 50 years. People think!
The drawback there seems to be that hybrids are subject to excessive wear on their ICE components due to the frequency of cold starts when switching from battery operation.
@@anotherjoe5675 That part is easily fixed with a electric pre oiling pump. Never a dry start and it can also after cool a turbo so they don't coke the oil and wear out the bearings. $150 USD. Easy oil changes, just open the valve and pump it out. Why don't manufacturers build with them? Because your engine would last ten times as long.
Governments needed to invent something to boost economic growth because the debt levels became so high that there is no way out to without growth and inflation. Cheap and efficient ICE became the enemy while EV's their best friends especially in the woke urban ares where a lot of people live.
reason 1 goverments have investments for royalties push it high cost make it back fast if most important prices would be cheaper a lot cheaper incentives with a heavy price still attached able to turn them off when ever they please not to forget control on the ones that have one, again if it was environment concern why the high prices, (THINK)
EVs are more damaging than ICE vehicles. ICE vehicles last two to three times longer than EVs. As most emissions are created as the car is built, ICE is twice as clean as the best EV
Don’t buy an EV. Buy a Hybrid. I own a Corolla so called “Mild Hybrid.” It has a small battery with a range of 1 mile. The Tesla Model 3 has a battery range of 318 miles yet my Corolla Hybrid with a battery range of 1 mile will outperform the Tesla Model 3. If I were to travel 1,000 miles that small battery will give me a range of 500 miles. So, half the journey would be in electric and half in gasoline. That small battery never runs out of charge because it is constantly being recharged without stopping the vehicle.
Records show global warming is happening at a too fast rate. Glaciers and ice fields are noticeably thawing at high rate.120 countries signed up at the Paris Agreement to zero carbon emissions by certain dates. Chinese EVs sales are growing globally at an astronomical rate. You guys must look and report on global markets and acceptance of EVs. You are so negative, the pluses far out weigh the negatives. The world, as gas stations are closing down in some countries, is surely on the right track to reduce those devastating carbon emissions which is slowly warming the planet with future catastrophic effects for our little planet as it circles our sun. .
Balderdash! Which country is coming to you to take away your ICE car? Even when they are banned from selling ICE vehicles, there will still be a second-hand market. Your choice, your consequences.
Oh yeeees, you! always! can! use! secondhand! Unfortunately all machines have their lifespan, and it is not so big. 10 years and it becomes almost unusable, especially if no parts produced anymore and it is modern electronics-filled design.
🤔Are EV battery fires the biggest threat to the electric revolution?
👉Why EV Owners Are Furious? Electric Vehicle Crisis: Owners Demand Answers as Battery Fires Surge! WATCH IT NOW HERE! 🎬ruclips.net/video/Xl3iac9pdlM/видео.html
@@PistonPundit No it's not battery fires it's the stone cold fact that EVs are no improvement on ICEs on any aspect except for one which is blistering acceleration.
Worse on range, worse on reliability, need constant updates for bug fixes (BUG FIXES on cars allowed out on the roads FFS😲), are hopeless on heavy loads or towing, worse in any weather conditions that are outside the sweet spot, offensively expensive even with gazillions of £$€ in subsidies, depreciate quicker than a pint of milk left out in the sun for a week, poorer quality builds.
I'm getting bored with the EVangelists lying about how they save the planet when the reverse is so blatantly true that it shouldn't need saying.
If you enjoy your EV then good luck to you but some of us carry real loads and travel real distances and for that we need real cars
your right but when they are no good perhaps there is a safe place for now to save them safe but after a while run out of room also the break down of them what will happen to the soil plants will die as well around the safe place
¹😊
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face. Forever. The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one: Don't let it happen, it depends on you."- George Orwell.
✨👍👍✨
The impression left by that boot is the Carbon footprint !
EVS MUST BE BANNED. EVS ARE DESTROYING OUR PLANET.
The whole point of EVs is to eventually remove private vehicles.
EV's have tailpipes too. At open pit mines for the batteries, at your charging station, and when the battery ends it's life it must be recycled carefully which requires fossil fuels too. So EV's, {Battery Cars} have 3 tailpipes, but you just can't see them,,,,,,,,,,,They are not zero carbon emitting cars either,,,,,,,,
It's all about control
We are controlled by lunatics how is this in USA /UK these leaders were given the best education? BUT WERE THEY I SAY NO their brains are corrupted,
Just like the covid lockdown and pandemic. That’s about control too. FJB.
Crude and less refined like some politicians I could name.
A lot of the recharges are not working. What good are they?
I’ll prefer a regular car until I can’t drive anymore. So there!
Cradle to grave, EVs and the infrastructures critical to allow them to function, are far more environmentally hostile to environment, habitat and CO2 emissions than ICEs can ever be.
And that's assuming that every EV is only powered by only renewables over the life of the vehicle which none of them are.
That's not even including the emissions produced by manufacturing and transporting the assets required to generate renewable electricity (solar or wind or tidal) nor the emissions from moving vehicles components or everything involved in generating renewable electricity, every bit of which is moved round the globe powered by OIL.
You Dead right Sir
wrong- your comments are Misinformation.
I have no desire to buy a stupid EV ever
It’s a good job we’re not all buying EVs our infrastructure would not cope, especially with the madness of Net Zero and ED Rubberband!!
What a better way to stop people having the independence of a car than to con them into something that doesn't work..
and ban everything else because of some nonsense, having no criteria and measurable outcome at all, just "save planet, Gretchen is crying!"
These points are spot on. Governments & short sighted politicians have blundered their way through this transition. It's a shame that the outlook could have been so different with a more far sighted approach.
No, it was always going to look something like this because the Battery is THE Point Failure Source for anything that uses batteries. Why do you think that everything small they make the battery easy to change out?
@robertkubrick3738 Your comment needs more explanation. Please explain why failure of politicians to start the process of infrastructure change early or cause a more integrated/gradual approach is related to small batteries?
@@enquiringmind4356 The battery is the point failure source. I said nothing about infrastructure or gradual changes. The battery alone was going to make all the problems. Worrying about the rest of it is like worrying about the lipstick on a pig. If batteries were twice as good, (not in the next 100 years) the infrastructure problem would only be half as large but still too large. The Battery is always the problem.
Electric vehicles here in the UK are unaffordable for the average working class person, public charging is extremely expensive, not everyone uses credit cards, I'm an older person, I use an old Nokia phone, it's simple to use, it makes and receives calls, what a phone is designed for, it still works, it doesn't need replacing, I've always paid for fuel with cash, can't do that with electricity chargers, you don't know how much it costs or what you've spent until you receive the credit card bill, then there's the lack of infrastructure, the cities have the infrastructure whilst many towns don't, the cars themselves, they have advanced so much, but they have eliminated dashboards in favour of screens, again, being older, I don't understand screens, I understand that they are cheaper to produce, but it's all designed for the young and wealthy people not older people like myself, and with not knowing how much a unit of electricity costs on public chargers and how much you've spent, I'd be frightened of the thought of running up huge credit card debts, as it stands, paying with cash, I know what I have in my pocket is the limit of what I can spend, that's the way I work, I was left to pay my family's debts, that took years to clear, I've never borrowed from anywhere or run up any personal debt and I'm not going to start now
If we all lived like that prices would be lower. I live that way for the greatest part. I have paid off people's debts and they are back in debt in no time. There is no disconnect between desire and buy for them.
People who ascribe some deep purpose to politicians' desire to force everyone into EVs are being overly generous. The real reason they're so enthusiastic isn't some high-minded ideology, it's money, just like everything else they do. They receive massive amounts of money in exchange for their support and like elites everywhere, they don't care what damage they do in the process as long as they get rich. It's the stupid little soldiers with blogs and RUclips channels, and the even stupider grunts in the streets that are motivated by ideology. That's why ideology exists, to turn people into tools so that the elites can use them to further their own interests. That's true of all ideology, incidentally, not just the other guy's. Stop trying to get your answers out of a book, life doesn't come with an instruction manual.
They are huge and you are sitting on a bomb from 16 i have been into RC boats yachts
cars i soon learned DO NOT put spare batter boxes in pocket ha ha ha i put some change
in same pockets woosh I was ripping my genes OFF I was on fire yes I was a fool but young a car that runs on batteries is bomb.
In the area I live in I wouldn’t give you $10.00 for an EV.
Nah, i aint buying one. Govt. mandating us is overreach..
The one thing we overlook with EVs is forest destruction. If you think EVs have nothing to do with forest destruction, well, think again. By law, every EV battery must be packed in a suitable container for transportation. That container is usually made from wood and is the size of a large refrigerator.
So, if they manufacture 1 million batteries, they will also have to manufacture 1 million wooden boxes the size of a large refrigerator and that means a lot of trees have to be felled to do so. Some containers are made from plastic but then there is the pollution to manufacture thousands of large plastic boxes. Also, a considerable amount of plastic packaging must be produced to line the boxes.
But at least there will be plenty of ready made coffins.
@@robertkubrick3738 Yes, they could use them for that.
EV's will have zero effect on oil production. Oil is used for hundreds of other uses and products than fuel for vehicles. We still need oil!
FTGJ 66% of oil used in transportation sector. Most of chemical products (plastics, hydrogen for fertilizers etc) are much cheaper to make from natural gas.
@@antontsau You can't make a battery car without a veritable lake of oil for each one. I dare you to make a battery car from wood and unicorn plastic in your back yard.
@robertkubrick3738 not oil, gas. Very few oil used for chemistry.
@@antontsau So you think the mining equipment, trucks, ships used to get the materials and move them to where they can be processed then move the refined materials to where the components are manufactured the the components moved to where cars are assembled then the cars moved to ships and the ships offloading them in destination country where they are loaded on trucks to be delivered doesn't require oil? You think it all runs off natural gas? Fine then, use your own natural gas in your back yard to make the plastics and chemical soup in the battery cells plus the insulator inside the cells. Then when you are done, don't drive on any roads that needed diesel vehicles to construct, which would be all but dirt trails.
@robertkubrick3738 its nothing. 300000 tonn ship transporting all this (oil, cars, parts, ore, grain...) to the other side of the planet consumes 1000 tonn of lowgrade fuel - 0.3%. 30 tonn tanker truck consumes 100L for the whole trip to petrol station and back, container truck consumes 300L for 1000km trip with 40t of cargo and so on. Only aviation consumes fuel comparable to load, yes - flight is expensive, so no one carries bulk cheap raw materials by planes (except our beloved govt, of course), its for expensive goods and rich passengers only.
Oil is VERY energy capable, its the reason why world uses it. It was energy effective even when was delivered by steam locos and steam ships all over the world. Even 2000 years ago it made sense to deliver grain, olive oil and fish by sea, ancient Greeks travelled with these goods all over Mediterranian.
There are no benefits. The fact that some of the materials in batteries are already in short supply means there is a limit to the production life of Ev’s
Not buying one of them things. Just bought a brand new truck with a V8
those can be turned off in a remote location control you don't pay no car until or easier lock down
EV's are much worse for the environment than ice cars,not only that wind and solar energy is very bad for the environment also. Then CO2 is essential for a healthy planet.
Keeping my standard car as long as possible
Look forward to use the EV scrap. Lot of useful tech onboard.
I can not wait to drive my first EV. ICE are history. FULL computer Self driving is my future. I wish it had been around when I was 20.
Are you for real?
The CO2 content in the atmosphere increased by 0.01% in the last 50 years. Out of it, 10% is due to human activity, and 90% is due to Sun activity. So, an increase of 0.001 % in 50 years. People think!
At this time, hybrid vehicles make a lot of sense.
The drawback there seems to be that hybrids are subject to excessive wear on their ICE components due to the frequency of cold starts when switching from battery operation.
Expensive complex systems with all the worst features of both,,,,,,worthless in a few years.
@@simonhunter8338 2020 Toyota Prisus are still on the road.
@@anotherjoe5675 That part is easily fixed with a electric pre oiling pump. Never a dry start and it can also after cool a turbo so they don't coke the oil and wear out the bearings. $150 USD. Easy oil changes, just open the valve and pump it out. Why don't manufacturers build with them? Because your engine would last ten times as long.
There is only a push to stop using killer ice.
Governments needed to invent something to boost economic growth because the debt levels became so high that there is no way out to without growth and inflation. Cheap and efficient ICE became the enemy while EV's their best friends especially in the woke urban ares where a lot of people live.
reason 1 goverments have investments for royalties push it high cost make it back fast if most important prices would be cheaper a lot cheaper incentives with a heavy price still attached able to turn them off when ever they please not to forget control on the ones that have one, again if it was environment concern why the high prices, (THINK)
EVs are more damaging than ICE vehicles. ICE vehicles last two to three times longer than EVs. As most emissions are created as the car is built, ICE is twice as clean as the best EV
Don’t buy an EV. Buy a Hybrid. I own a Corolla so called “Mild Hybrid.” It has a small battery with a range of 1 mile. The Tesla Model 3 has a battery range of 318 miles yet my Corolla Hybrid with a battery range of 1 mile will outperform the Tesla Model 3. If I were to travel 1,000 miles that small battery will give me a range of 500 miles. So, half the journey would be in electric and half in gasoline. That small battery never runs out of charge because it is constantly being recharged without stopping the vehicle.
if i put my foot down i can get my 5 L range rover 8 miles mpg
@@mikebrickwork2407 Yeah.
Its what blofield wants
Get that price down to a sensible figure with a fire proof battery. Then we're talking.
Not me,I’ll never buy one.
Fail
Records show global warming is happening at a too fast rate.
Glaciers and ice fields are noticeably thawing at high rate.120 countries signed up at the Paris Agreement to zero carbon emissions by certain dates. Chinese EVs sales are growing globally at an astronomical rate. You guys must look and report on global markets and acceptance of EVs. You are so negative, the pluses far out weigh the negatives. The world, as gas stations are closing down in some countries, is surely on the right track to reduce those devastating carbon emissions which is slowly warming the planet with future catastrophic effects for our little planet as it circles our sun.
.
And suddenly all the RUclips stories about EV batteries freezing in a bitterly cod winter....is not published as they were before.
Just get a Tesla.
Balderdash! Which country is coming to you to take away your ICE car? Even when they are banned from selling ICE vehicles, there will still be a second-hand market. Your choice, your consequences.
Oh yeeees, you! always! can! use! secondhand! Unfortunately all machines have their lifespan, and it is not so big. 10 years and it becomes almost unusable, especially if no parts produced anymore and it is modern electronics-filled design.
Parts of the UK are working to tax ICEs off the roads. ("Ultra-low emission zones.")