Cello Buying Guide

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 фев 2022
  • FREE Quick Reference Guides and Free Cello Sheet Music Here ➡️ cellopracticeguide.com/freegu...
    Join the Cello Checklist Challenge Here!
    / cellochecklistchallenge
    This video is not sponsored. Some links are affiliate links which means if you purchase something, I receive a small commission.
    Try Amazon Music Unlimited for FREE!
    amzn.to/3S5Q4oN
    Suzuki Cello Book 1 - amzn.to/47K7HAm
    Suzuki Cello Book 2 - amzn.to/48IwCWc
    Suzuki Cello Book 3 - amzn.to/48ENLzT
    Suzuki Cello Book 4 - amzn.to/427GG8L
    Suzuki Cello Book 5 - amzn.to/3SrPi6I
    Suzuki Cello Book 6 - amzn.to/3Hs4WJ6
    Suzuki Cello Book 7 - amzn.to/491Lb6Z
    Suzuki Cello Book 8 - amzn.to/3tTpgjH
    Suzuki Cello Book 9 - amzn.to/47SUxBe (includes piano accompaniment)
    ⭐️FREE! Try Kindle Unlimited for FREE!⭐️
    amzn.to/3Hr7fw2
    Cello Gear
    Cecilia (Andrea) SOLO Rosin - amzn.to/48IbL5g
    Cecilia (Andrea) Rosin - amzn.to/3vILg10
    Seiko Metronome - amzn.to/3u3PHmH
    Black Hole Endpin Stop amzn.to/3S9MrOy
    Cello Humidifier amzn.to/3HRzOlk
    My Strings - amzn.to/3pcr5Ss
    Practice Mute - amzn.to/3p4LFUY
    TimeCube - amzn.to/3wwQxck
    Cleaning Cloth for Strings (flannel) - amzn.to/4b7imI1
    Cleaning Cloth for Strings (microfiber) - amzn.to/3HpVxSu
    Student Level Strings MAKE SURE YOU GET THE CORRECT SIZE FOR YOUR CELLO ! (4/4,3/4,1/2 ETC) amzn.to/3Q61R4d
    Suzuki Books With CD
    Suzuki Cello Book 1 with CD - amzn.to/3OeMgAu
    Suzuki Cello Book 2 with CD - amzn.to/3S0ybYg
    Suzuki Cello Book 3 with CD - amzn.to/3u3JXcA
    Suzuki Cello Book 4 with CD - amzn.to/3HqSGIS
    Suzuki Cello (CD Only) 5 - amzn.to/492pX97
    Suzuki Cello Book 6 with CD - amzn.to/3Hqwped
    Suzuki Cello Book 7 with CD - amzn.to/3HnsxLb
    Suzuki Cello Book 8 with CD - amzn.to/3Ualzk9
    ⭐️FREE! Try Amazon Music Unlimited for FREE!⭐️
    amzn.to/497kpu5
    For all Quick Reference's Mentioned int the video visit me on Patreon
    / thecelloonline
    If you don't see what you are looking for email me at
    clay@thecello.online
    Supplemental Books by Rick Mooney
    Position Pieces Book 1 - amzn.to/3UaQOLT
    Position Pieces Book 2 - amzn.to/3HtV0yP
    Double Stops for Cello - amzn.to/4bktWjt
    Thumb Position for Cello Book 1 - amzn.to/48ZYMM7
    Thumb Position for Cello Book 2 - amzn.to/48H1pmp
    Other Method/Exercise Books I Use
    Alwin Schroeder 170 Foundation Studies - amzn.to/425O0Sh
    Popper Prep to High School of Cello Playing 15 Studies - amzn.to/427ZrJ6
    Popper High School of Cello Playing 40 Studies - amzn.to/424Y6D3
    Other Favorite Book Recommendations
    Musicophilia by Oliver Sacks - amzn.to/424Y6D3
    ⭐️FREE! Try Kindle Unlimited for FREE!⭐️
    amzn.to/4b6k7oY
    Misc. Recommendations
    Favorite For Recording Myself During Practice - amzn.to/492LmyT
    Suzuki Cello Livro 1
    Сузуки, виолончель, книга 1
    Suzuki Cellobuch 1
    Suzuki Violoncelle Livre 1
    铃木大提琴书1
    鈴木大提琴書1
    Suzuki Violonchelo Libro 1
    Violoncello Suzuki Libro 1
    鈴木チェロブック1
    🎥🎶🎻🎵🎥🎶🎻🎵📚📜📃📄📑💌‼️⬇️↗️↘️↙️↖️➡️⬅️⬆️🔜📣⭐️✨🌟

Комментарии • 78

  • @caidlod7143
    @caidlod7143 Год назад +22

    Bro I didn’t like the 12,000 dollar one! Unbelievable! I preferred the 2# and 3#

  • @markchang2617
    @markchang2617 Год назад +15

    My favorite was cello #2 from the start. It sounded more pleasant to me. The first one sounded harsh.

  • @donaufderbruck6179
    @donaufderbruck6179 Год назад +18

    Funny, I really did not like how the 1st one sounded and it turned out it was the most expensive one among the three.
    It was a tie between the 1000$ and the 1600$ for me in terms of sound.

  • @danjohnson8738
    @danjohnson8738 Год назад +9

    I am a 75 year old amateur cellist and have had my cello for thirty years or more. It is a very good looking cello with fine figured wood and a very bright , pleasing sound. When saw it it had no label in lt . My teacher and several others with knowledge agree that it is a German cello likely made a around 1900. I was playing a program with my mother who was a very fine pianist, when an older lady came up to me and said that she had inherited a cello from her uncle. The cello had been played in the. West Point orchestra in the 1940s. The next day I saw and bought the cello for the full asking price of $300. It did need to have some glue work and setup with new strings . It was not playable the day I purchased it , but it is my forever cello . The lesson of this story is that a cellist should be playing as many cellos as possible and not ruling out a private sale if the right cello happens to come along.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  Год назад +1

      That is absolutely a good point. People have nice instruments that for one reason or a another are not being used anymore. Like you said, try as many as possible and have other with knowledge help you decide before purchasing.

    • @MsCellobass
      @MsCellobass Месяц назад

      Wow! What a find!

  • @MichaelDBauer
    @MichaelDBauer Год назад +9

    My ears liked number 3 best though I liked 1 as well. 2 was a no go from the start.

    • @vincentL.7
      @vincentL.7 Месяц назад

      Idk 2 was the best to my ears, followed by 1 and 3

  • @noahj4125
    @noahj4125 Год назад +8

    Anyone else think cello one had an awful low end though? The C2s in the prelude felt so weak

  • @hildegerdhaugen7864
    @hildegerdhaugen7864 10 месяцев назад +2

    Love the sound of the third cello.

  • @damien2198
    @damien2198 Год назад +5

    What s your opinion on Electric ones ? they seem to sound really nice for the price especially with impulse response applied (like the 3 Sigma French Cello) and are easier to move around.My rental is definitely a #2 one

  • @PhxVanguard
    @PhxVanguard 2 месяца назад

    wow... this was an eye opener. i have been watching a lot of cello comparison and review videos and this was very helpful. i played viola years ago as a kid, but i always wanted to play cello and have always just had this recurring urge. my words to describe the three cellos were 1. crisp, clear, powerful. 2. dull, quiet, clunky. 3. rich, buttery, nice. when you brought up the prices, that was the "AHA!" moment. I have really been trying to see if my largely untrained ear could tell the difference and of course... my ear picked #1 for it's clarity and projection.
    Needless to say, starting out in my 30's for just a hobby around the house, i am not going to buy #1, but my ear liked #3 as a good runner up, although #1 was clearly, far and away the winner for my ear. maybe one day i will want to invest in a #1, but for now a #3 will suit me adequately. thank you!!

  • @lynettejones3514
    @lynettejones3514 10 месяцев назад +2

    Number 1 was my favourite. Resonance was much better with this one.

  • @ndechols
    @ndechols 2 месяца назад

    Could you list the maker/model for #3? Would love to hear one in person but can't figure out what it is

  • @MsCellobass
    @MsCellobass Месяц назад

    I just acquired a cello that is meant for people who have some physical challenges- small fingers, or being of short stature or whatever. I loved the sound of this
    cello and I bought it ( $8000) ouch! It’s called the scala Corta ( short scale) it has a full sized body, shorter neck and lowered fingerboard. The nut of the cello is also narrowed. I bought it thinking that since I have scoliosis it would’ve great. I kid you not this cello really projects and has a good tone but after some months of playing it I began to regret getting it for the simple reason that the bottom of the peg box sat on my shoulder or went up against my shoulder. I am short 5’0” and I had to take the end pin almost all the way out because of the pegbox problem. Since I am an intermediate, I will keep it for some time but I will longer seek out a 7/8 or short scale EVER AGAIN. I have a full size Luis and Clark cello (carbon fiber) and I have no problem playing it and I have had other full sized cellos. So my scoliosis and my short stature has no bearing - besides I don’t have short fingers. Great sounding cello but it seems that you have to be a midget 😂 to play that!

  • @tinyman520
    @tinyman520 Год назад +2

    3 is very well balanced, all round most pleasing. 1 sounds deeper and the high notes really sing. 2 was really flat and didn’t have anything going for it. Do you want to sell number 3?

  • @michaelblaney4461
    @michaelblaney4461 Год назад +2

    After viewing this again , I'm sure the 12k one is solid top, back and sides . Was the difference that maybe the 1k one was all laminated top , back and sides and the the $1599 cello maybe a hybrid solid top ,laminated back and sides .
    I'm a electric bassist and I'm looking into cello some at $1500 a knilling ( solid top ,laminated back and sides). For me a 3-6k a student instrument is somewhat ridiculous considering for 3k for a electric bass is more then sufficient.
    I'm sure the law of diminishing returns also applies to viol instruments .

  • @jvaubry
    @jvaubry 6 месяцев назад +4

    My first cello was a Romanian cello that cost $5000. After five years on this instrument, i paid my cello teacher(u of mi doctoral cello student) to go to brobst violin shop in Washington DC to audition eight instruments priced between $25k and $40k. Of these eight instruments, she determined only two had promise, a French cello from 1935, and a Collin-mezin cello from 1890. The Collin-Metin was her favorite, but the 1935 cello had a big voice also but dropped off in the higher registers. Upon hearing her comments, the violin shop removed the top, found a worm hole crack in the top under the fingerboard. After repairing the crack, re-attaching the top, cutting a new bridge, and stringing it up with Larsen strings, the instrument has a full sound in all registers, and no wolf notes. I purchased that instrument in 2008 for $25k, it is my only instrument, a French cello made and signed on the back by Joseph Victor Aubry, and his son, Joseph Victor Aubry fils 3rd, made in 1935 in LeHavre France. I purchased this instrument sight unseen, on the basis of the ears of my cello teacher Dr Eileen Brownell.

  • @JakeSweeper
    @JakeSweeper 2 года назад +3

    It was hard to pick out the differences between 1 and 3, but 2? Well, it had a deeper low-end, but sounded rediculously muffled, as if the sound box was filled with a pillow, compared to the other two.

  • @rrsatx
    @rrsatx 3 месяца назад +1

    Im afraid to ask if theres anything respectable for $600> for a new adult student 4/4 😮

  • @spinozareader
    @spinozareader Год назад

    I live 2.75 hrs from St. Louis. I'm thinking about a road trip to buy a cello from there. Any shops you'd recommend? I spoke with the folks at Top Notch over the phone and found them very patient and helpful. Thanks so much!

  • @xaldinnix9410
    @xaldinnix9410 10 месяцев назад +1

    I like 1, 2, and 3 all for different reasons. To hear you explain the deferent sounds, it seems like you have synesthesia. I personally have always wanted to learn the cello, but my end goal is to be able to play the cello part in R.E.M's The Sweetness Follows, and Flames by V.A.S.T. Could you recommend a set up that could get me there? The closest person that can teach cello is a 60 mile drive through heavy traffic, and that's just not doable for me.

    • @jenna2431
      @jenna2431 10 месяцев назад

      I feel the pain. I live in the Great Valley of Maryland which isn't great if you're a classical musician. I took up cello again after a 47year break in that oh-so-fun summer 2020. There's just NADA out here. The nearest community orchestra is 50 miles one way. You'd need something with a pick-up for what you want to play. The Forte Carbon Fiber with 3-D printed parts (Fiddlershop) would have a good projection AND be bullet-proof if it'll be a gigging cello. That's my .02.

  • @naitomea14
    @naitomea14 11 дней назад

    I'm the outsider that thinks nr 2 is the best xD
    Nr 1 is so sterile to me. Yes, it sounds exactly how you think a cello should sound, but there is almost no character to it - it does sound almost shallow.
    Nr2 does have the character. I loved the second piece you played on it. The C string sound like a thunder, this mixed with the D and A string, sound so nice ❤
    Nr 3 is like a mix of Nr1 and 2. It does have a more sterile sound, but it does have more character in it.
    I play cello only since April, so yeah, complete beginner 😅

  • @troubleddove
    @troubleddove 10 месяцев назад +2

    Ok so can you tell me what brand or where to look for cello number 3? I absolutely adored it in both listenings, and im a young adult whos just hoping to start out. I dont plan on ever playing in a large area so its probably my best option for at least a good while. I dont really have anyone to give me more suggestions but of all the videos ive watched that instrument was lovely. If not do you have any solid suggestions for ones extremely similiar to number 3?

    • @troubleddove
      @troubleddove 10 месяцев назад +2

      Or even if you had the specific name of the 3rd model so I could try to find it second hand:)

    • @healthyheathen
      @healthyheathen Месяц назад

      I came to the comments hoping for the same. 😮‍💨

  • @billhubbell3414
    @billhubbell3414 10 месяцев назад +2

    I really liked #1. Thought it sounded brighter and fuller and cleaner. #2 was just bad. #3 runner up but no comparison to #1.

    • @StarComet7
      @StarComet7 Месяц назад

      Sounded super good on the high end, kinda mid on the lows

  • @katcomshaw-arnold6979
    @katcomshaw-arnold6979 Год назад

    Not a cello player, and even I picked 1, 3, then 2. So if I were beginning, I would rent, or the price of free would sound great.

  • @emmanuelverdin8653
    @emmanuelverdin8653 9 месяцев назад

    Hey, I've found a listing for a Krutz 100 series cello for around $900. It appears to be in good condition and doesn't have structural damage. I'm on the line since I don't know much about Krutz, do you think you can offer me some advice? I'm a college student and would like to join a local symphony.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  9 месяцев назад +1

      I have seen Krutz they are ok, last a while, we have some in our classroom purchased before I got there and I have been there 8 years. Without hearing it and seeing it its hard to say I wouldn't want to give you a firm opinion without playing it and seeing it. Do you have another cellist or a teacher that can play it for you and give another opinion? In the local symphony you mentioned do you already know anyone in there that could help you make a decision? I would start there.

  • @austinburns4213
    @austinburns4213 9 месяцев назад

    Excellent video. First, I am not a cello player. I really liked #3 for balance on the low end - it seemed the best controlled of the three, but unfortunately, it got kind fuzzy and muted as you went up the scale; quieter than the others. #1 seemed a little too bright and nasally at times on both the lowest notes and highest notes. That may be desirable? or a function of the microphones and computer speakers I am listening through. Clearly loads of volume projection and perhaps that will mellow out over the years. #2 - I thought it sounded like cardboard, frankly. Again, listening though computer speakers.
    Years ago I started to learn cello as an adult, but soon gave up due to arthritis. At the time, I was surprised at the range of instrument prices, and perplexed why they make a 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 25K instruments and so on... What is the real difference between a 3K and 4K? It didn't seem like a linear scale for what you got for your money. I think this video points out you have to hear them to understand, and each instrument is its own beast, irrespective of price. Perhaps on average, 1-2K makes a difference, but there may be a significant overlap instrument to instrument. The one you like is the one you like, and your budget limitations are yours alone. If you won the lottery, you may still choose a 3K instrument.

  • @tavi22love
    @tavi22love 3 месяца назад

    Number 3 was just enough for me

  • @kyraschlining4562
    @kyraschlining4562 Год назад +4

    Cello #1 by a long shot.

  • @MsCellobass
    @MsCellobass Месяц назад

    Great video cello no 2 sounded muffled no 3 sounded meh ok😁 Cello 1. Is the winner

  • @sarahbrzezniak373
    @sarahbrzezniak373 Месяц назад

    Clay, is there a national cello registry and does the number stamped or printed on the label like the number 10000 indicate that it could have been built in the 1940’s?

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  Месяц назад

      I don’t believe there is a registry. The number could be a serial number or model number from that maker. Contact me through the website and let me see a picture of the label.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  Месяц назад

      Or if you have a google drive or icloud drive link of the label post that in a reply here maybe someone in our community has seen that label from that maker before.

  • @drmarx999
    @drmarx999 2 года назад +2

    So, what were the three celli? I liked #1 as being the most balanced from top to bottom, and the nicest tone. #2 had nothing going for it, and I thought that #3 was brassy. I prefer my Jay Haide over all of them! Nice video!

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  2 года назад +1

      The first one is my personal Cello that I usually use in the videos. It was made by a maker in Atlanta Boguslaw Kieta. The second is by Knilling, their Bucharest Model and the third is a Hans Kroger Model sold by South West Strings. I inquired and they no longer carry this model.

    • @firechill9999
      @firechill9999 2 года назад

      @@thecelloonline I also liked the first most. How did you find this cello?

    • @andreaholcek4094
      @andreaholcek4094 2 года назад

      Wonderful information. Thank you thank you !

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  2 года назад

      @@andreaholcek4094 Glad I could help

    • @salemamahajan349
      @salemamahajan349 Год назад

      Hello can you know brands as I am adult cello person and I want to upgrade between 2500 to 3500 can you let me know what is good in that range ,looking at a piccolo romainian cello 7/8 at a reputable music store and how is Wultee? Jaid Haid ? And eatmsn ? Thsnk you

  • @mxz6607
    @mxz6607 8 месяцев назад

    I like the #1 when I first heard it, #2 sounds a bit dull like something is blocking it, #3 was too bright too loud and squeaky in a sense.

  • @Yesthankyou8
    @Yesthankyou8 10 месяцев назад

    I liked N1 and 3

  • @Rosahonung
    @Rosahonung 9 месяцев назад

    think nr 2 sound the best honestly, its clean and balanced

  • @IsraelIsLikeWater
    @IsraelIsLikeWater 10 месяцев назад

    I wonder if the strings were new on each cello… 🤔

  • @verticalhamburger9517
    @verticalhamburger9517 8 дней назад

    First one sounded clunky and dry. Second one sounded a bit hollow; the first one had too much midrange, this one had too little.
    Third one had more bite than the second, and although it wasn't that impressive, I think I liked that one the most

  • @DijonStockpile
    @DijonStockpile 15 дней назад

    I like 2 but I also like scooped mids and coke zero

  • @CC-Pi
    @CC-Pi 10 месяцев назад

    I thought cello 3 sounded better at first until you played the higher notes, then cello 1 revealed it's self as much better balanced sound across all frequencies.

  • @scottstarkey2286
    @scottstarkey2286 9 месяцев назад

    I thought #3 had the least favorable sound. 2 was great as was 1.

  • @trabouliste1037
    @trabouliste1037 3 месяца назад

    A resonant concert hall may compensate for a less resonant body (as for example in this very nice interpretation: ruclips.net/video/wbH3JYfRjOQ/видео.htmlsi=rbJZkPEpr9vQeqDq), but it isn’t that body…

  • @trabouliste1037
    @trabouliste1037 3 месяца назад

    I guessed 5000 for #1, 500 for #2 and 1000 for #3.
    #2 ist totally flat and without any resonance.

  • @McBumbleFlump
    @McBumbleFlump 7 месяцев назад

    lol and here I am going "wow number 2 has such a clean sound. 3 has a beautiful growling bass sound along with the brightness. And 1 just sounds bad"

  • @iscavengersam
    @iscavengersam Месяц назад

    3

  • @TheCatGoesRawrMusik
    @TheCatGoesRawrMusik Год назад

    I am gonna be playing as a hobby XP
    Liked Chello 3 best (less resonant but more balanced)
    did not like Chello 2 or 1
    did however think that chello 2 sounded more balanced even if not resonat
    guesses were
    Chello 1 800 - 1200 (I am not kidding XD)
    Chello 2 1000 - 1500
    Chello 3 1800 - 2500

  • @tatianaes3354
    @tatianaes3354 10 месяцев назад

    *THE $1600 cello has the best sound.*
    But the chap is right that it is not the only criteria. So-called “projection” can not be heard via RUclips in such a test, so we have to trust him that $12000 cello is heard from further away, so it is the only choice for bigger performance halls. This cello has to be compared to others within its own price range, not to the cheaper ones in the video.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  10 месяцев назад

      Yes I wish there was a way to do that. My dream is to one day remake this video in a concert hall or recital hall.

    • @tatianaes3354
      @tatianaes3354 10 месяцев назад

      @@thecelloonline such an experiment is too expensive.

  • @michaelblaney4461
    @michaelblaney4461 Год назад +2

    So $3000- 6000 for a high level student cello ?
    Moral of the story , be well off to start this instrument.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  Год назад +1

      Yes, thats the estimate here in the St. Louis area where I am. And I made this video a year ago before inflation took off.

  • @alimoghnieh1621
    @alimoghnieh1621 9 месяцев назад

    Is it a complete waste of money to buy a $350 electric cello to learn on if one is not trying to become a professional cellist?

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  9 месяцев назад

      Link please if you have one. $350 is not very much. Its not about whether you are becoming a professional, its about whether or not the instrument is going to respond to what you are learning to do. There is nothing more frustrating than trying to get a tool to do a job that it is just too cheap or not built to do.

    • @alimoghnieh1621
      @alimoghnieh1621 9 месяцев назад

      ​@@thecelloonline for some reason RUclips is not allowing me to post that link here, but if you want to look it up, it's the Cecilio CECO-1DW Electric Silent Cello.

  • @jamesliu327
    @jamesliu327 8 месяцев назад

    Cello 3 is better than cello 1 for me. So the price does not reflect the quality?

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  8 месяцев назад

      In this case for sure, price absolutely does not reflect quality. As you get into different tiers yes an upper tier instrument is going to cost more. But again, if all things are relative a $25,000 instrument could sound better than a $35,000 instrument.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  8 месяцев назад

      Also, this kind of thing just happened recently with a student. $5,000 better than $7,000… hands down beyond a shadow of a doubt better.

  • @SVAFnemesis
    @SVAFnemesis 2 месяца назад

    musicians, regardless of their experience and skill, tend to user impropoer words to describe sound quality. 'warm, mellow, bright, clear, muddy' these words has zero meaning. Sound engineers would've describe different sound quality based on their actual attributes such as resonance, timbre, attack, delay, etc.

    • @thecelloonline
      @thecelloonline  2 месяца назад

      You misspelled improper. I do like the comment, really. We should all strive to expand our vocabulary when it comes to the sound. Our vocabulary is very lacking. When you start drawing a line in the sand though and claiming that certain words are dogma when it comes to describing sound, you have missed the point I'm afraid. This is an organic process, sound and music go where words can not. We do our best to describe the sound with the words we have but ultimately words will always fail, no matter how good we get at it. And that is as it should be. Experiencing music should be different from experiencing the written/spoken word. If words could absolutely describe the sound and ultimately replace the need for the sound there would be no point in music. It is a subjective art form, not an absolute. There are no "right" words and "wrong" words.

  • @Swamp_Donkey_
    @Swamp_Donkey_ 9 месяцев назад

    bro wtf is going on with that last chord?

    • @shinoalee9932
      @shinoalee9932 5 месяцев назад +2

      My guess is the creator just isn't that good at playing the cello

  • @Estipi18
    @Estipi18 7 месяцев назад

    1 Ups are good, balance, sound and bass were also rich. Lows good at best, but yet balance with overall sound.
    3mid ups, lows were even better than 1
    2 i didn't like it, too sharp/edgy for my soul

  • @scottlife1697
    @scottlife1697 Год назад

    Hilarious! Cello#1 sounds shrill and bright. Not to my liking. Cello #2 was my favourite by a long shot! Dark, Mellow resonates with my personal frequency. Cello #3 least favourite weak tone, boring and rough. Lol

  • @cassieramirez2086
    @cassieramirez2086 Год назад

    My teacher is in high demand 😭 he was just like “see you next week. Get your own cello for classes from now on” can barely even get ahold of the guy. He’s not going anywhere with me, not even cello shopping 🥲

    • @michaelblaney4461
      @michaelblaney4461 Год назад +3

      Time to reevaluate your teacher I guess, there are other teachers . You have picked a extraordinarily expensive instrument to learn.

    • @Globeguy1
      @Globeguy1 Год назад +1

      What is considered customary when a teacher goes cello shopping with you? Do you compensate them somehow? Maybe a thank you gift?