Nikon Coolpix B700 vs Coolpix P900 - Which One is Better?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Nikon Coolpix B700 is most recent superzoom camera from Nikon. It has 20 MP sensor, 60x zoom, 4K video recording capability. Nikon Coolpix P900 is 2 years old superzoom camera with extremely huge 83x zoom. Is age of this camera making it worse than newer superzooms? In this video we will compare them side by side, showing photo and video quality differences and zoom difference in real world.
B700:
- has 20mpx sensor
- 60x zoom 24-1440mm (in eq. Of 35mm) with f/3.3-6.5 aperture lens
- ability to shoot 4K video at max. Of 30fps
- it weights 570 g
P900:
- has 16mpx sensor
- 83x zoom 24-2000mm (in eq. Of 35mm) with f/2.8-6.5 aperture lens
- ability to shoot 1080p at 60fps
- it weights 899 g
NIKON COOLPIX P900 NIKON COOLPIX B700 PHOTO VIDEO QUALITY CAMERA COMPARISON
____________
Used music:
1. • ♩♫ Epic and Dramatic M...
2.
Music by BENSOUND www.bensound.co....
Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported- CC BY 3.0
creativecommons....
Music promoted by Audio Library • Video
3.♫Music By♫
●Ritorikal - Daydreaming Bass Rebels Release]
●Song/Free Download - • Ritorikal - Daydreamin...
●iTunes, Spotify, GooglePlay - smarturl.it/br-...
●Support Ritorikal - smarturl.it/Rit...
B700 shoots raw you probably didn’t mention
BLACK Thanks for the input! Yes, you are right!
BLACK can you please explain what that means?
it's basically losless file format. JPEG is compressed and pre-processed, RAW is losless and gives you oppurtunity to improve image on your own with use of software (like for example Photoshop).
This is exactly why I chose the B700 over the P900. The extra zoom capability of the P900 is nice but not dramatically different, and extra zoom isn't going to mean anything if the shot isn't properly exposed. Meanwhile, I can under expose a shot with the B700, and fix it in post processing. I mean you can take shots that are soo underexposed they look almost pitch black, then bring the exposure back up in post processing and still have it be usable. But it's more useful for photo's that only have minor bad exposure. RAW can mean the difference between saving a photo or having no workable photo at all.
I absolutely hate in-camera sharpening and effects, you have way more control in photoshop. When people say RAW is lossless, most people don't realize exactly what that means. Well with JPEG, it means that all the light data is scrubbed. JPEG stores the colors of an image (and does some processing to average them out), while in RAW each pixel doesn't just have a color value, it has a more precise color value (able to distinguish more colors) and a brightness value too that affects colors and helps with post processing.
Even if you're an amateur, RAW can help bring your images to the next level.
I think it's really a shame you didn't exhibit the difference of a properly post processed image from the B700, or show the actual pixel per pixel difference in the size of an object. All things considered, the P900 only actually makes objects 5% larger than the B700. Those images that looked better on the P900, could easily be matched or outdone by the B700 if post processed correctly, and I'm not talking extensive processing either, just a minute or so worth of work. In Photoshop RAW you can even set custom defaults for most of the settings, meaning the post processing will be applied as soon as you open the RAW file. So what I do is set the general range of things I want, like lens correction, defringing, sharpening, etc.....then I tweak it from there, and in a minute or less I can have the image fully post processed the way I like it.
Great Video - thank-you. I may be able to contribute here as my wife and I have just spent 3 months birding in Singapore using both of these cameras on a daily basis. I use the P900 and she uses the B700, so we have many instances of near identical shots taken with these cameras, and often at maximum zoom. My conclusion, after studying these, is that the B700 has a very slight edge in image quality, on account of the BSI-CMOS sensor. It is only slight, but this and the 20 MP (versus 16) enables cropping to the same zoom level as the P900, with approximately equivalent final results. However, as you point out, the build quality and ease of zooming are considerably better in the P900. Both of these cameras are awesome though. The image stabilisation capability of both is truly remarkable, enabling steady shots at maximum zoom. I even have centred hand-held shots that are not blurred by movement way into the digital zoom range, although when you leave the optical zoom domain into the digital one, the image begins to deteriorate, as you would expect. One thing that you didn't mention was the 'burst' capability of each camera. The P900 wins here with 7 shots/second, vs 5 for the B700. If anyone intends to use this feature (highly recommended for birding or sport at maximum zoom), one big negative of both of these cameras is the almost non-existent buffer, so that the camera is inoperable for several seconds whilst the 'burst' images are written to the card. That is one big difference from a DLSR, although no DSLR can come anywhere close to the image that can be produced by either of these cameras at maximum optical zoom, in good light. In poor light it's a different story. Both the P900 and B700 can have problems focusing in poor light and the image from both tends to deteriorate due to noise from the high ISO that the small sensor requires. The larger aperture of the P900 doesn't help much in this regard, as it only applies at the short end of the zoom, so the two cameras are fairly equal in that regard. Weight and size-wise, the B700 wins hands down. It packs approximately equivalent capability into a much smaller lighter package. If you want a hugely capable camera light enough to throw in a rucsack just in case you need it, get the B700. If you want to shoot all day with a camera that has a really professional feel and is a sheer joy to use, need the continuous shooting rate, don't care about RAW or movies, then get the P900. Hope this helps someone.
chris kenyon r
chris kenyon Kindly some one explain differences between Digital vs optical zoom
Thanks God Bless I bought P900 from India Mumbai in 2017
I am yet to get best out of it please explain if possible and how to go by digital optical thanks
versus.com/br/nikon-coolpix-b700-vs-nikon-coolpix-p900
Very helpful video and comments_ am considering the b700 for practicality, sharper images and price. Thanks for your help!
i have b700 more options than p900 just p900 the more 20x zoom difference between them but the money is talking here :)
I watched your video a few times to help me decide which camera to get for my son (I use the P950 myself). I ended up ordering both (used) and returned both due to the condition being much worse than the seller described. Here are my impressions, in case anyone is still interested in 2021! lol
B700 seems to have a better build. The P900 had loose fittings, not sure if it's due to wear. But the flash, dials, wheels were all shaky and had some give.
They both supposedly have the same quality of viewfinder but somehow the B700 one looked a little better. The P900 one wasn't a perfect rectangle; it was strangely curved. But neither of the viewfinders even come close to the amazing one on the P950.
I love the size of the B700. It's so compact, and feels beautiful in the hand. And even fits in my pocket!! B700 button layout is also superior. Two Fn buttons instead of one. The P900 has a dedicated button for connecting to the phone. What a waste of real estate.
The P900 pros are longer zoom (not that much longer in daily use, IMO, not worth making a decision just based on that), wider aperture (I think that is important) and a threaded lens. The B700 doesn't have a threaded lens for filters. You can buy an adapter though. I think the image quality and optical stabilization of the P900 is a little better. I didn't test extensively since mine arrived stinking of cigarette smoke. :/ All I know is that the low light photography is really bad on the B700, while it's great on the P950.
If I had to choose one, it would be the B700.
Great review
Have ordered a P900 so just cant wait to go out and take some decent wildlife shots.
Thankyou for a great review and now feel pleased chose the P900.
Didn't you forgot to mention the GPS in P900 ? I am using B700 and am pleased, even better if using monopod or tripod. The wifi and bluetooth is useful when photographing bird nests or other sensitive objects. Using an Ipad as remote control unit.
@Steve Blake I have used it only once on my phone, next time it didn´t work, had to reload everything, not a good funktion.
I buy a photo camera to take photos, I wish they would just keep the two separate like it used to be, save me money on my hobby and makes what I use better at its purpose. Bugger 4k and all that malarkey. Does it take great photos of the moon? Great.
For a person who's more interested in astrophotography like me, I highly recommend the P900. I first bought the B700 and was pleasantly surprised with its zooming capabilities. Little did I know about the P900 at the time. After watching some P900 review videos, I got rid of the B700 and bought the P900. I know the B700 has RAW, 4K function and 20 MP, but I love my P900.
Lungani Hlongwa leaving the zoom factor apart which did you feel better the b700 or p900 ?
Lungani Hlongwa p900 is awesome. Just very short battery life.
Where can I view your photos? :-)
Lungani Hlongwa can I view some of your photographs? I am also interested in Astrophotography and am thinking about getting the P900
I have canon sx60 hs .. its amazing camera . I am using for prank video .
Thanks a lot for this review, it's very useful for me to decide which one.
But, the P900 has GPS function will be added another credit.
i own both cameras and wouldn't choose between them! p900 is noisy when zooming and auto focusing, and alot heavier especially when zoomed out completely. b700 is wifi and bluetooth and p900 is wifi only. both take very similar image and video and its actually hard to tell the difference between the 2.
I was looking for a Nikon superzoom for the eclipse to run video side-car to my Canon 400mm still camera. I seriously considered the P900 because *zoom* right? Then I read the specifications for its images. No rivals? Really? It shoots *jpg only* and no 4K. The B700 shoots RAW and 4k video and... seriously how can you say the P900 has no rivals? The *only* thing it has going for it is the increased zoom. RAW image quality will absolutely crush any jpg ever taken so... ?
I love videography I have p900 but you guys go with b700 bcoz it's provide you better photos then p900,p900 have only 1 advantage it's zoom but if saw both zoom difference is 10/9 very close b700
lot of work went into this video, and it has less than 200 likes. that sad
I know the struggle of a small RUclipsr & the 1000 sub 4000 hrs so I sub(Enjoy Weekend)
B700 is 20MP so its actually 1800mm on P900 16MP
Not exactly. I remember doing the math a while ago, but basically, while the zoom makes objects ~20% larger, due to the resolution difference, the actual pixel makeup of an object is only about ~5% larger on the P900, making the P900 almost trivial. It does mean the P900 could technically deliver sharper images by default, especially at its maximum zoom. But post processing with RAW on the B700 can deliver superior sharpening and other superior post processing techniques.
I would add to that, the lens of the P900 isn't exactly sharp at it's maximum "zoom". Not to mention for video the B700 can actually record in 4K, kinda giving you a 2x crop option without loss of quality vs the P900's 1080p
To be quite honest the P900 is more marketing fluff than it can actually deliver, heck my FZ1000 with I.Zoom+digital zoom can even compete with it... The upcoming P1000 is quite interesting though...
chyba lepiej poczekać na następcę P900, oby miał RAW... w ogóle powinni zacząć wreszcie używać większych sensorów do tych megazoomów, 1/1.7" zrobiłby lepszą robotę, a skoro Nikon opatentował nowy obiektyw o jeszcze dłuższej ogniskowej niż w P900, to z większym sensorem współczynnik zoomu nie byłby aż tak drastycznie niższy...
i've always heard anywhere that the B700 quality picture is a little bit better. I'd prefer to sacrifice a few zooming power to a better quality picture. Anyway we are atalking about a 1 2/3 sensor size, what's needed all that zoom?. Plus as already said one. RAW pictures are another featuer in it. I think that Nikon had preferred to sacrifice some zoom to a better quality picture and better videos. Build quality i've never had hands on p900 but i trust on you as you are not the first one saying it....b700 anyway is not that bad as build quality considering his weight and ingumbrance. maibe the p900 focus better and the 2.8 f helps a little little bit more but.....picture quality i think is a little bit better anyway on b700....If i do have to give a fair rate for them. is 55% to B700 vs 45% to P900. Both has pro and cons, but to be honest, sacrifice some zoom for more quality and features it is way more interesting, and cost a little bit less. From who has a P900 is not worth to upgrade to b700, but as you said, to wait another one! I give you a like anyway for the efforts, pics and tests done. ....I'm a b700 owner
P900 rules
Oby1 Oby1
I am really trying to figure out which one to choose. Money is a think to have in mind. Where I live the B700 is €400, while the P900 is about €530-550. But I guess the extra zoom might be worth the extra cost. However, as you said photo quality is the top priority for the final result. At the moment I shoot some macros of insects and flowers, but I would like to be able to get some better macro photography and also be able to photograph a bird from a distance, as sharp as possible and with clarity! Also it would be nice to get some quality videos of the same things. I know a DSLR might be the ideal, but that would cost a fortune for me! So, to conclude, what are your views on the Coolpix B700, as you own it? Is the result of the photos actually good for clear macro photography and distant-tele photography, as well as the videos quality? The extra zoom that P900 provides sounds amazing, but if that will be with less photo/video quality then that's a think!.. I would be very thankful if you replied.
B700 have slighter better detail. Off course the ISO can be set more on p900 but both work horrible after 800 for night photography.
With Raw format you can catch details and colors that allow you to edit the pictures way more better.
You can catch things on distance even with b700 and it is enough! I've shot a bell Tower at 12 Km but the picture came bad because at such distances any picture goes bad if weather Conditions are "best".
You can catch the moon, and somewhere I've seen one catching the ISS space station....off course with horrible details, but let you know the power of it.
Plus it's lighter
Oby1 Oby1 Thank you! Do you know anything about the improvement of P900 to P1100 if I am correct? Do you know if it was released or a price or if it is really improved?
On Google i can't find nothing about this p1100. But since a while there are rumors about the successor of the p900 and it would be for sure even better than those in this video. But for an higher price, and these camera will drop their price a few. But you must consider that if that camera will be released, maibe will be priced around 600 euros. And in that time it would be better buying a lumix fx2000 that actually cost 2000 euros, and within 1 year will drop its price a lot, but if there is going to be a difference even of 200 euros between a "p1100" and a fz2000, then the second would be better anyway.
Because changing from a 1.2/3 sensor to a 1.7 there's big difference. Ok, not a big zoom but....for sure greatest photos on a bridge camera.
Tra, maibe it would be better an older model with an higher sensor rather than a New one with a smaller sensor
I have the b700 and so far it's not a bad camera! Aspecially the 4k quality and the biggest problems in the b700 is there is not movie manual mode, bad focus and iso range from 100 to 3200. But so far With its 60x zoom It's very good for its price !
I have the P900. I use it for shooting birds using different settings in aperture mode , mostly using spot focus I get great pictures. I think it does a good job. Just take it out of Auto mode and learn about ISO , shutter speed and aperture settings. Sometimes I have to re- focus ( auto) but that's no big deal. The more I use it the more I like it. One more thing, most of the time I don't use the live view screen do every thing through the viewfinder even reviewing the pictures when I'm in the field. This saves on the battery and protected the screen.
Personally I find manual focus on these camera's give a sharper image. When I shoot birds on my B700 and I want to take a really good shot, I'll pre-focus the area, or hope they stay in one spot long enough to manually focus. Never gotten an image as sharp with auto focus settings. The auto focus is decent in general though and can be sharpened good in post processing, but I've gotten images that look straight out of national geographic, where you can see every single detail of the birds individual feathers.
Let me know which one you prefer - because choice of real winner in this comparison is UP TO YOU!
M-Galaxy I'll prefer P900 just because of Larger Aperture ..❤✌
christ anti I don't know what specifically you do, but one thing that B700 has, which P900 lacks is RAW shooting. That may be useful in graphics releated work. Other than that P900 is better, because of better zoom and brighter lens.
Thank you for the video. I guess here in brazil the best choice is b700. Its the less expensive option.
how about p610 guys?
M-Galaxy P1000 Vs b700:- P1000 doesn't have RAW and its much heavier, in comparison to the b700, which still has a good zooming range for it size. The b700 is lower priced, smaller and much lighter in weight, one would be more inclined use it more often, for that reason alone. Lugging around a heavier camera will take its toll on you after a few hours walking around believe me I know, having been a Professional Photographer for 10 years.
I would subscribe if there wasn’t that stupid unnecessary annoying manipulation music. Just talk to us.
This changed a bit over those 4 years 😉
B700 I am using since 1n half years.....
Pretty good camera in video manual mode and special scene modes.......
But disappointing in aperture control, setted limits are there
vote for better optical zoom.
Чак Норис make the same comparison with flowers and bees at 1.20 Cm - they will both have huge problems but both models will shoot photos that no other camera can capture. So not just a better optical zoom - a high end variant.
I have b700. Now I can say if you want zoom then obviously should go through p900. You will be satisfied. Otherwise go for DSLR. Its matter in iso, sensor and pic quality. But both camera nice unless you don't want to be go professionally. Low light pic in manual mode I'm not satisfied.
Of course low light is going to suck. The sensor is smaller than your fingernail. These are not low light camera's at all. That's when you have to decrease shutter speed for more exposure. Then the problem with that is motion. You need a much more steady hand or tripod for longer exposure. The B700 beats the P900 here because of RAW. You can slightly under or over expose a shot with the B700, but fix it in post processing. You might get more noise with a slight under exposure, but you can get blown out highlights with a slight over exposure.
P900 is the better photo camera, B700 is the better video camera. I would have liked to have heard how the microphones sounded on each of them. The reason I use a Sony HX300 instead of my Nikon P510 is the mic has too much hiss and the focus tracking is aweful, but I keep it around because it takes much sharper photos than the Sony. Nikon's ED glass is the best on consumer grade cameras.
Brilliant uncomplicated demo, found by accident, have now confirmed that the heavy P900 is my next choice... Thankyou
versus.com/br/nikon-coolpix-b700-vs-nikon-coolpix-p900
I only have to say two bad things about the P900, it doesn't have manual settings for video and we can't adjust focus on the fly, like with Sony and Panasonic cameras. The lack of manual settings for video make it very hard to set a good indoor lighting.
Technically you could get "2880mm" out of the B700 when cropping that 4K video to 1080p (2x1440mm).
Hello I really like your video more power & god bless you
🇹🇷 b700 👎/// p900 👍 /// p1000 💪
Thank you for the thumbs up of my comments to your video i’am always watch your video & i’am your a regular supporter subscribers & followers thank you very very much & god bless you
You're not explaining the functionality of a b700. I need to know the functionality I need to know what each of the triggers are for. That's why I came here I didn't come here for a cosmetic look. And by the way the b700 is just fine for Astro photography
P900 = Globe Killer
I really wanted to buy the P900 but now I think I'll wait for its successor as I'm into astrophotography
May I know when or what's the p900 succesor called?
1000?
@@crazy3rdgen out now ive heard
Azure Butterfly Infinity just get the 900, it’s not worth it. $500 vs $1000 and it’s not even that major of an upgrade
THANK YOU, or should I say "dziekuje"! I've been reading reviews all day, but this answered some questions that the others did not. Like: do you get better image quality with the B700 by giving up some of the zoom length? And yours is the first review to show side by side shots with the two cameras, which shows me that NO, the B700 does not produce sharper images, and in fact I preferred the brighter P900 shots in some cases. That helps me out so much. But also seeing the two cameras side by side helps put the size difference in perspective. I'm still a little torn and need to look into some other cameras, but the questions you answered here helped me out so much. Thanks again!
hallielou Również dziękuję :) Yes, I am doing these reviews the way I would like to see them if I were interested in some camera. That's point of my channel. I think many reviews lack needrd information like you said picture quality, zoom compariosn in real world etc. Thanks again!
I want p1000
Tattu Gameh Agreed but I'm getting impatient.
@@tobylynn75 out now ive heard
Had the P900 but its too heavy for fun and quick shots, need to find something else now.
What the difference. P900. P1000. Up grades. Is it worth to buy the P1000. Buy extra. ? Tnx folks
Really wanted the extra zoom but after testing 1440mm to 2000mm i thought i could probably live with 1440. Its not like 600 on my old camera to 1440, that's pretty big,like double the size on your lcd.
Got some beans and tuna out of the cupboard that weighed almost the same as the p900 and decided on the spot to get the b700 instead :)
Hi, a nice video. I have Nikon B-500 and I'm very happy with the camera.
P900....Not 83x. Only 27x.
This is info for all newbees.
The camera states that focus length goes from 24mm to 2000mm.
That is true.
Therefore total magnification is 83x (as 2000/24=83).
However the human eye sees objects with 75mm.
Therefore true magnification is only 27x (as 2000/75=27).
So for a camera marketed as a ZOOM camera it is wrong to state 83x.
Unfortunately (in this price range) there are no other cameras that go beyond 2000mm.
And sadly all manufacturers (and sellers) start counting their magnification from 20,22 or 24mm.
Because of this widespread lie i wrote this to all newbees. I lost a lot of time figuring out why my camera does not give me 83x, because I looked into the camera and looked outside and saw that the bloody camera zoomed backwards more than forwards. So only when I zoomed past half way on the camera did I see the same size as I seen with my eyes. It pissed me off.
It's not a lie. Camera definetley has 83x optical zoom (24-2000mm), how human eye sees maginifcation have nothing to do with camera zoom, but with human eye. What would you want? Camera manufacturers to provide human eye zoom equivalent? I don't see a point. Word would change, not zoom.
In order to obtain 80X zoom you would need a 75-6000 lens :-) take your camera, put an object on a floor such as a shoe and then zoom in til it reaches the size you see with your own eyes.
Okay but I don't see a problem with this camera and Nikon. It's generally standard to provide zoom information in such way.
Man the B700 is better 20MP 4K Raw not bulky
Thank you. The video is very helpful 👍
Nice to meet you from Indonesia 🇮🇩
he tenido las dos y puedo decir que la p900 pesa demasiado y es muy grande para llevartela de paseo a hacer fotos, la b700 tiene muy buen zoom tambien y es mucho menos pesada y comoda de llevar
hi
is that coolpix p900 can take milky way shots?
Heck no. You cant set the exposure past 15 seconds and the sensor is tiny. My cellphone (Mate 8) takes 5x better night photos than my p900
dude,its not a telescope.
I love my P900 and will not trade for the upgrade P1000. Too big; not practical for walking around, better for stationary viewing.
The difference in the zum is negligible... But the difference in price is significant. Tnx for that compare!
quality of the picture??
features??
I just got the b700 it's working good.
TELESCOPE!!!!!
Guy's please....these are "Superzoom"-camera's...with tiny sensors...(only.about...6mm x 4,5mm)..if you want quality-picture or video....you got to get a camera with "APS-C" or "Full Frame sensor"...These sensors are about ..."APS-C" = 23mm x 15mm ..and.."Full Frame" = 36mm x 24mm....the bigger the sensor...the more light it can catch...a Superzoomcamera with bigger sensor would need a much bigger... "too big"..lens..that's why Superzoomcamera's have tiny sensors...and that's the reason why they are only good in brite light...it's as simple as that...
Great video dude! Subscribed :)
B700 Best
If you were me, which one you'd prefer, buy this camera or a lens that can go to 100-400mm, i want to buy a lens, but when i think about it, there is a limitation in camera life, when it worn out, i have to change a new camera. But if i buy a p900 i don't have to think about expensive lens, bc it does it job. And also i wonder with this camera, can i get money from it picture, if the results of its picture is good enough, i would prefer to buy this camera than a lens that cost too much.
Wonderful review. Can you do a comparision for Sony HX400V vs The Nikon P900. Which one you think is better cosidering 50x zoom is adequate for me. Also how much difference the backlit Sensors of P900 help in low light?
Which one do you think it's better for wildlife photography? and for pictures at night? Than you!
P900 for both. Lower aperture and more reach.
Thanks a lot!
Thanks so much for the review! The best review of these cameras I've seen!
Any news about the successor for the P900?
FLAT EARTH
P900
Harvey, you may not know this but the p900 is the camera of choice of flatards, almost every flat Earth moron has a p900.
Some of them don't even know how to use the damn thing, the praise the p900 gets from those morons is hilarious.
Is there any cameras which are about 100 - 200 Aus dollars more than the b700 which are better. Or is the B700 just one of the best buys on the market !
B7000
very good evaluation , thank you very much !!
I'm currently asking myself these questions
Do I need 4k ? No and are big files anyway will take up alot of memory and will most probably be doing more still photography than videos
Do I need raw support ?
Is 335g alot of difference ?
Do I need the extra 4MP ?
Do I need the extra 23x zoom ?
The B700 is smaller and lighter to carry around
The P900 main selling point is the extra zoom and 2.8 f-stop better focus
Like the idea of taking photos of birds and planes and astrophotography but most likely birds
Hmmm
La P 900 es mejor y es genial
successor of p900 is double the price and only have minor upgrades whih are not worth the double price.
I have the B700. If you record in 4k and your just rendering to 1080p you can get an extra 2x zoom without loosing quality. Total zoom 120x. Plus if you crop a pic to the p900 size you get a little extra zoom. Its a nice camera. Might have to get the P1000 or whatever they will call it if its better.
I need nikon p900 but I don't have money
When is the successor coming??
Punya saya tombol samping kanannya yg utk addjust brightness juga ga berfungsi. Ada cara utk perbaikinya?
In 2018 model which canon dslr camera model is best under 50000rs with all future. Please tell me...
Great Video Brother
They both are good... I had a 100 dollar and 70 dollar camera those 2 are way better
Nikon cool Picx p900 good boget camera
I tried both a lot,p900s 1400mm has better image quality than b700s 1440mm.but b700 is really lightweight.
Not true. The difference you're seeing is probably because the P900 applies all of the post processing on the camera before it goes to JPEG. But a well post processed RAW image on a computer from the B700 will be superior due to more advanced techniques and controls available in post processing programs on the computer. The P900 still does a decent job though, especially if someone just wants a usable image without putting any work into it. But without RAW, it also means that if you don't get the ISO/Aperature/F-stop/Exposure settings perfect, you could get a bad unusable photo that can't be fixed.
Add canon sx60hs to this comparison if possible
BLACK I would love to, but it's not possible with my current viewers number.
Canon SX60HS is better than the nikon B500 at least, with more extras. I've got a comparison video of those two. I haven't gone Into P900 or B700 yet though.
@@greenhoodie i will view your comparison , i may also ask some fee question in your video. thanks
I must say, overall sad. 500 euro for what? Only a zoom. Pass.
Nikon b700 not available on online stores in India anymore.maybe Nikon is not making a lot of them anymore.maybe we will have an upgrade
wow nice is the best comparison in the world
Can please tell me what should I use to edit raw pictures coz my pc apps can't read the format even photo shop
p900 has better image quality overall, just no RAW. But the prebaked JPEGs are excellent.
WRONG!!! B700 20.2 mp P900 16mp and for video B700 4K and for P900 HD only. And the P900 can't shoot RAW!
P900 is basically for an old guy that wants to take pictures but doesn't know how to use a computer much.
Is there any chance to my b700 everytime i switch it on says camera lens error it was accidentally droped at thesame time it was zoomed I need help please
Awesome comparison! Thank you.
Thank you. :)
M-Galaxy I purchased a Nikon P520 over Canon because of your Nikon reviews!
In 2018 model which Nikon dslr camera model is best under 50000rs with all future. Please tell me...
Gideon.mg. funoy Nikon D5500/D5600.
Subscribed ! Good luck
Thanks man!
I have Nikon b700 is good for shoot moon and video :)
Could you please show me a moon photo?, I want to buy a b700 but I'm not sure
I also prefer p900
I think sony and panasonic aswell as Fujifilm are way to over priced!
I love Nikon any model
P 900 ,more better P 1000
I like p900
SUBSCRIBED BROTHER & LIKED 😇😇
which one is better for macros (plastic aircraft scale models)?
In 2018 which canon dslr camera model is best under 50000rs. Please tell me...
Gideon.mg. funoy I don't recommend any Canon but if this is a must then I would go only with 80D - not sure about the price though.
I have Canon 600d
Now I'm looking for zoom ability so can I get zoom lens to achieve this zoom or I have to buy b700
have to buy
Very good. Great work. Next time show how to blur the background.
you didn't mention what the dimensions of the sensor are. How big is the sensor in each camera. Very important
jesuisravi Like in most compact cameras - both have 1/2.3 inch sensor.
P900
What would you recommend for a hobbieist?
What's better for videos ?
B700 (it records 4k videos).