@FaridResponds
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- @FaridResponds made a video attempting to downplay the weight of the "Islamic Dilemma" used by non-muslims to demonstrate the Quran is false.
Strangly, Farid doesn't seem to make much effort attempting to defend the Quran - and instead asserts that any contradiction between the Quran and the Torah/Injeel must be intentional and rather than being a mistake - it must be evidence of an attempt at "correcting" the previous scriptures that the People of the Book were required to follow the law of prior to Muhammad.
Want to help fund my ministry or become a ministry partner? buymeacoffee.c...
Farid treading water as usual.
Subscribed to your channel for that comment!
As a las vegas native I am deeply offended. Las vegas has been around for more than 2000 years. It's been around since the time of Adam and eve. Both of them were at the casinos playing blackjack and roulette. Then god cast them out of Las vegas and sent them to the middle east because they lost too many sheckles.
I feel you! 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Syfe will never debate you. Hamza will never debate you. Farid will never debate you. The Ummah is so weak.
The holes in the narrative are confirmed!
By their own scholars!
Both in ancient times and modern times!
😂😂😂😂 are you new or something with that comment, he doesn’t put up them discussions you have to go t the other side for them discussions he’s had 😂
@@johnogrady_ What are you on about?
@@ThePrimusCrusader the ummah respects the best deceivers. They know the da'ii are twisting the truth and using lies and deceptive tactics. They applaud them for it. The ummah is weak and dishonorable.
@@johnogrady_bud just said a whole lotta nothin 😂
Farid belongs to the Fiction Section.
Islam belongs to that as well.
😂 💯
Well...."it is a metaphysical matter"
Subscribed to your channel for that comment!
God bless you, Chris.
Love your response.
Subscribed to your channel for that comment!
These clowns never learn. Oh well🤔
There you go the “Peace be upon him”. Why do they keep saying that? There is an underlying messianic nature to Islam. They don’t want to admit it but Jesus was probably the template for the Muhammad character they worship.
They say "Jesus peace upon him" when the Quran says Allah took Jesus up onto himself at the top of the 7 heavens, he is where Allah is, so why does he need peace? Aint being next to Allah the greatest peace? Quran is a dumb demonic book that makes no matter how u slice it
Peace be upon the guy who launched offensive wars of conquest
It's Piss Be Apon Him.
Totally impossible. Light cannot be s template for darkness or righteousness for Evil.
Farid no response 😂
Fantastic summary!
If the Quran is true, then Islam is false. Why? Because the Quran says to trust the Gospel and the Gospel contradict the Quran. This means the Quran can't be true if it says the gospel message is also true.
Which gospel specifically mentioned by the quran?
@@justapassione5554
1) That’s one of the problems of the Quran, the Quran is often vague and the author doesn’t sound like the sharpest tool in the shed.
2) The four gospels were back then named as the gospel namely the fourfold gospel.
So most likely it’s meant to be the four gospels, specifically because the Quran refers to it as the gospel that is with them meaning the christians
@Ex-MuslimTestimonies nah nah, Islam solved the problem itself. Sirat Rasul Allah states John is the Injeel. John doesn't substantiate the Qu'ran, therefore the Qu'ran is false.
And Sirat Rasul Allah is legitimized in the same tier as authentic hadith, possibly even more from how it's praised for being an "ocean of knowledge"
@@justapassione5554The Gospel mentioned by the Quran is the revelation sent to 'Isa(as); copies of this could still be found here and there in the seventh century, though in rapidly dwindling numbers, since by then it had almost completely been displaced by the four Gospels.
This true Injil is currently lost. I strongly suspect it is the Gospel mentioned four times in the first century text of the Didache; it is also likely the source of some references to a Hebrew Gospel; an account of how it came to be replaced by the four Gospels is found in Qadi Abdul Jabbar's "A Critique of Christian Origins".
@@omarmirza9957Secular Jewish historian Josephus in his text (The Antiquities) wrote about the crucifixion of Jesus within 100 years of the event.
Secular Roman historian Tacitus wrote about the crucifixion of Jesus in The Tacitus Histories within 100 years of the event.
The Quran states this is 4:157-
“And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allāh." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.”
Just saying I’d be very skeptical to listen to what a man said about the crucifixion 600 years later (with not witnesses), and calling the earlier gospel corrupted when secular historians make the same claim as the earlier apostles.
Contradictions are perfectly preserved:
one quran says "you", another says "I".
Dawah script: "they are different accents" 🤣🤣🤣
Hafs says "you (muhummud) wonder", while hamza, al kesai and khalaf versions say "I (allah) wonder". Which is the correct quran?
This is the text of sura 37.12 in the
hafs quran:
بَلْ عَجِبْتَ وَيَسْخَرُونَ: “
But YOU are amazed, and they mock”
hamza, al kesai and khalaf:
بَلْ عَجِبْتُ وَيَسْخَرُونَ:
“But I am amazed, and they mock”
The difference between the two sentences is the speaker’s perspective. The first sentence uses “عَجِبْتَ” (you are amazed), indicating that the speaker is addressing someone else. The second sentence uses “عَجِبْتُ” (I am amazed), indicating that the speaker is referring to themselves.
And these:
1. 2:10 - “They try to deceive Allah and those who have attained faith, yet they deceive none but themselves, but they are unaware.” (Nafieʻ, Ibn Kathir and Abu ʻAmr read it as: “. . . yet they try to deceive none but . . .”)
2. 2:119 - “with the truth as a herald of glad tidings and as a warner, for you will not be asked about the fellows of purgatory.” (Nafieʻ and Yaʻqub read it as: “. . . as a warner, so do not ask about the fellows of purgatory.”)
3. 2:165 - “And if only those who have done injustice could see” (Nafieʻ, Ibn ʻAmer and Yaʻqub read it as: “And if only you could see those who have done injustice . . .”)
4. 3:23 - “being called to the Scripture of Allah to judge between them” (Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “. . . being called to the Scripture of Allah so that it may be judged between them . . .”)
5. 3:79 - “Be godly on account of the Scripture which you used to teach and on account of what you used to learn.” (All except for Ibn ʻAmer, ʻAsem, Hamza, Al Kesa’i and Khalaf read it as: “. . . used to know and . . .”)
6. 3:161 - “And never was it for a prophet to defraud” (All except for Ibn Kathir, Abu ʻAmr and ʻAsem read it as: “And never was it for a prophet to be defrauded . . .”)
7. 4:135 - “But if you twist (your testimony) or disregard (giving it)-then indeed Allah has always been All-Aware of what you do.” (Ibn ʻAmer and Hamza read it as: “But whether you go forward (by testifying) or disregard . . .”)
8. 6:27 - “If only we could be sent back and not disbelieve in the signs of our Lord and be of the believers!” (All except for Hafs, Hamza and Yaʻqub read it as: “If only we could be sent back-for we do not disbelieve in the signs of our Lord-and be of the believers!”)
9. 6:105 - “And thus We diversify the signs, and so that they say, “You have studied,” and so that” (Ibn Kathir and Abu ʻAmr read it as: “. . . they say, ‘You have studied with someone’ . . .” Ibn ʻAmer and Yaʻqub read it as: “. . . they say, ‘(That is) outdated’...”
10. 10:16 - “Say, “Had Allah willed, I would not have read it to you and He would not have informed you about it,” (Al-Bazzi in one of his narrations read it as: “. . . and He would have informed you about it (through someone else) . . .”
11. 12:31 - “So when she heard of their gossip, she sent for them and prepared for them reclining cushions and brought each one of them a knife” (Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “. . . and prepared for them citrus fruits and brought each . . .”)
12. 13:33 - “and they were barred from the way.” (Nafieʻ, Ibn Kathir, Abu ʻAmr, Ibn ʻAmer and Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “. . . and they barred (others) from . . .”)
13. 18:86 - “he found it setting in a murky spring” (All except for Nafieʻ, Ibn Kathir, Abu ʻAmr, Hafs and Yaʻqub read it as: “. . . in a hot spring . . .”)
14. 20:31,32 - “Aaron, my brother; strengthen me with him” (Ibn ʻAmer read it as: “. . . my brother, (so that) I (can) strengthen myself with him”)
15. 22:39 - “Permission has been granted to those who are combated” (All except for Nafieʻ, Ibn ʻAmer, Hafs, and Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “. . . to those who combat . . .”)
16. 23:67 - “in arrogance regarding it, conversing by night (about it), (yet) deserting it.” (Nafieʻ read it as: “. . . conversing by night (about it), (yet) blaspheming.”)
17. 24:34 - “And We have most surely sent down to you clarifying signs” - (All except for Ibn ʻAmer, Hafs, Hamza, Al-Kesa’i and Khalaf read it as: “. . . clarified signs . . .”)
18. 37:130 - ““Peace be upon Elijah.” (Nafieʻ, Ibn ʻAmer and Yaʻqub read it as: “Peace be upon Elijah’s folk.”)
19. 40:37 - “and he was barred from the way” (Nafieʻ, Ibn Kathir, Abu ʻAmr, Ibn ʻAmer and Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “. . . and he barred (others) from the way . . .”)
20. 47:4 - “As for those who were killed in the way of Allah” (All except for Abu ʻAmr, Hafs and Yaʻqub read it as: “As for those who combated in the way of Allah . . .”)
21. 56:89 - “Yet, if he is one of those brought near (to God), then serenity and fragrant plants and a Garden of Bliss” (Roways read it as: “. . . then a soul with fragrant plants and a Garden of bliss.”)
22. 70:1 - “An asker asked about a punishment sure to come” ( Nafieʻ, Ibn ʻAmer and Abu Jaʻfar read it as: “A flood has flooded with a punishment sure to come . . .” According to the dialect of the tribes of Hijaz, the narration of Nafieʻ, Ibn ʻAmer and Abu Jaʻfar means exactly the same as all the others.)
23. 73:6 - “The vigil of the night is indeed more intense and” (Abu ʻAmr and Ibn ʻAmer read it as: “. . . is indeed more suitable and . . .”)
24. 77:33 - “as if they are yellow camels.” (All except for Hafs, Hamza, Al-Kesa’i, Khalaf and Roways read as: “. . . as if they are herds of yellow camels.” Roways read it as: “…as if they are thick yellow ropes.”)
Didn't a tamed sheep eat parts of the Queeran?
Yes. It was the adult breast feeding and adultery stoning verses.
Sure did! Sahih Muslim 1452a Book 17, Hadith 30
Sunan Ibn Majah 1944 Book 9, Hadith 100
Sahih Muslim 1452b Book 17, Hadith 31
Yes lol - n this alone disproves the fact of preservation of quran lol
My one thought in all the “Bible is corrupt” is - where are the “originals” they’re referring to? Where are the fragments of the “original” Injeel that contradict the Gospels we have today? What credible historians are citing these “original” scriptures and why aren’t these “originals” being used by atheists and critical scholars to shred the validity of the Gospels?
I too have given up defending the Quran. But I actually never defend it to begin with.
That means you are not sincerely to read the Qur'an. This guy is clown. You follow the footsteps of this guy will lead astray
@@nurulhassan2219 so you engage in ad hominem rather than address the arguments. A bit like farid it seems.
@@nurulhassan2219 Have u read that corrupted comic book that is just a remnant of goat poo.
Your god could not even protect it from a goat never mind from Uthman's burning.
@@kevinblow3797 Don't forget bro Farid can speak and read Arabic in any Islamic sources. Can this guy read Arabic?
@@nurulhassan2219 It doesnt matter I dont have to know spanish to know that hola means hello. Plus Im pretty sure hes friends with jai whos fluent in arabic.
One correction, scholars generally believe Mohammad was in fact literate, and that the idea of his illiteracy likely came in the 8th century
Shi'ism also believes Muhammad is literate.
No, scholars do not generally believe that as there is no evidence of it. Which scholars have stated that he was literate?
@@omarmirza9957 see Sean Anthony, Catherine Bronson, Sebastian Gunther, Angelika Newirth, etc.; basically the contrary of what you said: there's little evidence that he was illiterate, and instead, there were factors that lead us to believe he was most likely literate.
@@omarmirza9957the Hadith of the pen and paper is the proof that Momo was literate
That s why there was a scission between the Shia and Sunni
Sahih al bukhari 114
@@omarmirza9957please learn about your sect and stop listening to your lying scholars
built on sand !!!
This was a great video. I could listen to this expanded all day.
Without lies Islam dies..
I like your content. God bless you. Its nice to see some level headed people talking about religion.
Always good to see your face you are truly doing Gods work
Awesome stuff, thank you Chris. 👍👍😊😊❤️❤️
they threw stones while living in a glass house , now their glass castle is shattered as well as their lies
Chris, at this rate, Farid will never debate you or directly address the pertinent points. He’s proven to be very dishonest and deliberately obtuse.
This is the Muslim shuffle that they do but if sandal were on the other foot they’d be ridiculing Christians
Brother Chris, i am curious. What have other muslims say about the location and age of mecca?
I hope they come to Jesus today, brother Chris. Thank you for the great research work you do. God bless, brother!!
They say the same thing as Farid. That it’s been there since the time of Abraham and that him and his son Ishmael set the foundation and built the Kaaba. Though, as Chris explained, it makes no sense but it’s part of the Islamic narrative so they have to go with it and believe that if not it debunks their religion.
@KL823BVDC sad. They are trapped in a web of lies. Brother, I am very concerned for their souls.
"Revisionist theories" ... but that's what the Qu'ran is all about... seriously, muslims basically treat it as a bugfix patch for the Bible... except it wasn't tested and introduces more bugs and glitches and needs to be rolled back.
SUPER!
Since I am Muslim I feel like I ought to give an answer to this video (In roughly chronological order). This will not be a standard answer because I am Shia and our beliefs are much more amendable to (the more moderate claims of) critical scholarship. For example, we believe Muhammad (A.S.) was literate, that the Qur'an was created as God revealed it (and thus has context relating to contemporary events and literature), and that the hadith are not to be taken uncritically. I am open to the name Muhammad being a title, and I actually believe Ahmed is a title, meaning Paraclete. I also believe that the Bible is preserved (though not primarily in the manuscripts Protestants prefer) and that the Qur'an affirms and has masterful knowledge of it. In 5:48 the Qur'an claims to be the Muhayminan (A term only used twice, once here referring to the Qur'an's relationship to the Bible, and once as a title of God in a long list of titles, thus we are left to figure it its context from the reference here) of the Bible, which I understand to mean Midrash given both the context of the Chapter and the Qur'ans use of Biblical passages. I agree with you that Mecca was not a massive city, when it is called the Mother of Cities I understand that to be a reference to it being roughly the location where Adam and Eva were expelled. The reason the Qur'an mentions things not easily known to its local populace is because it is a message to all mankind, not just the Hejaz, and while we are on the subject of the Hejaz both Eusebius and Jerome place Cades/Kadesh in the region. I do not see why you believe that the rituals of Hajj resembling the rituals of pilgrimage to Jerusalem is a point against Islam. That is like saying praying the Hours is a point against Christianity because Jews do something similar. I am fine saying that the early Muslims (the ones who would persecute and murder the Prophet's family) used a different Qibla than Mecca, and given you are a Christian and so believe the disciples did not get the idea about the fulfillment of the Law of Moses until Paul, I do not see why you are using a comparable scenario as a point against Islam, especially because the change of Mosque direction to Mecca coincides with the rise of the Abbasids, a dynasty initially supported by Shi'ites. On the topic of the cross, believing in the crucifixion IS an acceptable belief in my sect of Islam, Twelver Shi'ism, and it is actually the standard belief in Ismaili Sh'ism, in fact, the first reference anywhere to Muslims denying the crucifixion is found in an apologetic against Islam (during rule by the dynasty that murdered and persecuted the Ahul-Bayt, I might add) written by John of Damascus. Also, Shi'ism is completely fine with images, even religious images, so the early caliphs using iconography on coins is not a problem for us. Alexander the Great is the hardest point for me to defend, I admit, but Josephus recounts him treating the Jews well and even sacrificing to the Lord, and even if I did not have a religious reason to believe that I would still be inclined to believe it happened, given Alexander's teacher was a monotheist (Aristotle) and that the Jews greeted him well. I will grant that the gates of Alexander would be incomprehensible if taken as literal history, and that it would be arbitrary to decide that this story alone is non-literal, but I take a non-literal reading of much of the Qur'an, given its Midrashic nature. I believe in the Septuagint Old Testament and a largely Majority/Byzantine New Testament as the preserved form of the Bible, and while not everything in them is comfortable to Shia Islam, I will admit (namely the sins of the Prophets), they also do not teach Christian dogmas such as the trinity, incarnation, and substitutionary atonement.
Glad you admitting the difference the the Christian teaching and Islamic teaching.
I can’t reconcile the Quran with the scriptures.. it’s actually impossible for me as a Christian who studies the scripture to believe in any prophet after Christ.
@@AkhgyThen you haven't studied the Scriptures well. If you do not believe in any prophet after Christ what does that make the apostles, or Paul, or the various prophets mentioned in Acts?
Great work Chris 💪✝️
Jesus was called Mohammed.....the all together lovely one
CAP
Wow, great research Chris! That was an excellent summary.
FaridNoLongerResponds
lol.
Farid Denies.
Farid Retreats
If I say "2+2=5" in a public speech, and 100 years later there's a reliable chain of transmission that I said that, does that make the statement "2+2=5" true? No it just means the tradition of me saying "2+2=5" is historically accurate.
The funny sad thing,farid believe in collective amnesia 😅.
All Christians and Jews knew about mecca and they all got together and remembered to forget about it.
Wine was forbidden but all the Jews and Christians got together and forget it was forbidden.
In paradise after you die you'll get a translucent sex doll, but the Jews and Christians got together and forgot about it.
Nabateans is where it started.....PETRA
29:04 I highly doubt there was a man named Muhammad in the 7th century who claimed to be the last and final prophet and messenger of god instead the figure of prophet Muhammad was inspired by legendary stories of prophet Mani and Jesus of Nazareth and other Middle Eastern traditions that were orally circulating around and when the Abbasids came to power they begin to construct the figure of prophet Muhammad ibn Abdullah to create a separate Arab religion by taking stories from previously existing faiths.
Farid Handwaves
Another amazing work and information Chris!!!! If S.I.N (Standard Islamic Narrative) have holes in it, then you my friend expanded those holes. Good work and may the Lord bless you and your work!
I keep going to SYFE’s channel asking him why he won’t do a live debate with the Christian’s he criticizes. Surely, as a champion of Islam, he would want to prove them wrong in front of if his subscribers, right? Of course, I’ve never received a reply yet 🤷♂️.
When I have made the effort to go directly to Farid he seemed a bit vague and a bit light on detail.
I think you'll like my comment, I went into a lot of detail.
Good videos👍🏼
Thanks Chris for the factual historic references proving and sharing the truth. God Bless. ✝
Superb Chris. You’re just getting better and better. GBWY.
great work!
There is a reason people like Farid and SYFETalk never do live debates.
not everyone has emotional stability for a debate
If he wants to debate, let him debate daniel or muhammad hijab?
🤣🤣
He tries but they run example hamzas den
good work chris
Great job brother
You should debate Mary Harb on where Islam originates from.
who?
God bless you
Brother. Could you please continue your talk with Hamza’s Dad (John) about the Quran/Injeel? The convo was interrupted last time and I want to see it fleshed out. I was really enjoying the flow of it!
Looks like farid responds has no responds, they're all getting check mate left, right center
There is a very interesting documentary on Muhammeds origins. Turns out that the descriptions of where he came from was not mecca but Petra. The Qibla (direction of prayer) is also wrong, Muslims have no idea that they're following a religion that simply made things up as it went along.
Hi Chris love what you do may you go from strength to strength. In the Q'Uran there is a passage where Mohammad said "BELLS are musical instruments of the Shaitan.", When Mohammad was asked how do the revelations come to you. he replies." Sometimes it comes like the ringing of a BELL." OOPs Hammy Shaitan is giving revelations.....Proof their book is of Shaitan...
Do you have a drive file, doc, or pdf with the sources you used for the major points you made?
That chocolate kettle came from the left field 😂😂😂
Hey Chris! Do you have any book recommendations for studying the reliability of the Hadith literature? You mentioned critical scholarship questioning it, I would love to look more into this.
It's fascinating reading the subtle differences between the accounts of muhammad's first revelation (in Ibn Ishaq, at Tabari, Ibn Kathir and the hadith)
Didn't know they called the Torah the "Namus" (ie Νόμος)
-another Greek word in Islam to add to the list!
Sahih Muslim 160a:
The first (form) with which was started the revelation to the Messenger of Allah was the true vision in sleep. And he did not see any vision but it came like the bright gleam of dawn.
Thenceforth solitude became dear to him and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira', where he would engage in tahannuth (and that is a worship for a number of nights) before returning to his family and getting provisions again for this purpose.
He would then return to Khadija and take provisions for a like period, till Truth came upon him while he was in the cave of Hira'.
There came to him the angel and said:
Recite,
to which he replied: I am not lettered.
He took hold of me [the Apostle said] and pressed me, till I was hard pressed; thereafter he let me off and said: Recite.
I said: I am not lettered.
He then again took hold of me and pressed me for the second time till I was hard pressed and then let me off and said: Recite,
to which I replied: I am not lettered.
He took hold of me and pressed me for the third time, till I was hard pressed and then let me go and said:
Recite in the name of your Lord Who created, created man from a clot of blood.
Recite. And your most bountiful Lord is He Who taught the use of pen,
taught man what he knew not (al-Qur'an, xcvi. 1-4).
Then the Prophet returned therewith, his heart was trembling, and he went to Khadija and said: Wrap me up, wrap me up! So they wrapped him till the fear had left him. He then said to Khadija: O Khadija! what has happened to me? and he informed her of the happening, saying: I fear for myself.
She replied: It can't be. Be happy. I swear by Allah that He shall never humiliate you. By Allah, you join ties of relationship, you speak the truth, you bear people's burden, you help the destitute, you entertain guests, and you help against the vicissitudes which affect people.
Khadija then took him to Waraqa b. Naufal b. Asad b. 'Abd al-'Uzza, and he was the son of Khadija's uncle, i. e., the brother of her father. And he was the man who had embraced Christianity in the Days of Ignorance (i. e. before Islam) and he used to write books in Arabic and, therefore, wrote Injil in Arabic as God willed that he should write.
He was very old and had become blind Khadija said to him: O uncle! listen to the son of your brother.
Waraqa b. Naufal said: O my nephew! what did you see? The Messenger of Allah, then, informed him what he had seen, and Waraqa said to him: It is Namus that God sent down to Musa. Would that I were then (during your prophetic career) a young man. Would that I might be alive when your people would expel you! The Messenger of Allah said: Will they drive me out? Waraqa said: Yes. Never came a man with a like of what you have brought but met hostilities. If I see your day I shall help you wholeheartedly.
Al Tabari Volume 6
The first form in which the revelation came to the Messenger of God was true vision; this used to come to him like the break of dawn."'
After that, he grew to love solitude and used to remain in a cave on Hira' engaged in acts of devotion for a number of days before returning to his family.
Then he would return to his family and supply himself with provisions for a similar number of days.
This continued until the Truth came to him unexpectedly," and said. 'Muhammad, you are the Messenger of God.
The Messenger of God said, "I had been standing, but fell to my knees; and crawled away, my shoulders trembling. I went to Khadijah and said, 'Wrap me up! Wrap me up!'97 When the terror had left me, he came to me and said, 'Muhammad, you are the Messenger of God."'
He (Muhammad) said: I had been thinking of hurling myself down from a mountain crag, but he appeared to me, as I was thinking about this, and said, "Muhammad, I am Gabriel and you are the Messenger of God."
Then he said, "Recite!" I said, "What shall I recite? He took me and pressed me three times tightly until I was nearly stifled and was utterly exhausted ; then he said:
"Recite in the name of your Lord who created," and I recited it.
Then I went to Khadijah and said, "I have been in fear for my life." When I told her what had happened, she said, "Rejoice, for God will never put you to shame, for you treat your kinsfolk well, tell the truth, deliver what is entrusted to you, endure fatigue, offer hospitality to the guest, and aid people in misfortune."
Then she took me to Waraqah b. Nawfal b . Asad and said to him "Listen to your brother's son." He questioned me and I told him what had happened. He said, "This is the Namus which was sent down to Moses, son of Imran. Would that I were a young man now, and would that I could be alive when your people drive you out!" I said, "Will they drive me out?" "Yes," he said. "No man has ever brought the message which you have brought without being met with enmity. If I live to see that day, I shall come firmly to your aid."
Ibn Ishaq
the apostle set forth to Hira' as was his wont, and his family with hin. When it was the night on which God honoured him with his miasion and showed mercy on His servants thereby,
Gabriel brought him the command of God. He came to me,' said the apostle of God, 'while I was asleep, with a coverlet of brocade whereon was some writing, and said, "Readl" I said, "What shall I read?" He pressed me with it 8o tightly that I thought it was death; then he let me go and said, "Read!" I said, "What shall I read?" He pressed me with it again so that I thought it was death; then he let me go and said "Read!" I said, "What shall I read?" He pressed me with it the third time so that I thought it was death and said "Read!" I said, "What then shall I read?"-and this I said only to deliver myself from him, lest he should do the same to me again. He sad:
"Read in the name of thy Lord who created, Who created man of blood coagulated.
Read Thy Lord is the most beneficent,
Who taught by the pen,
Taught that which they knew not unto men."
So I read it, and he departedfrom me. And I awoke frommy sleep, and it was as though these words were written on my heart.
(T. Now none of God's creatures was more hateful to me than an (ecstatic) poet or a man possessed: I could not even look at them. I thought, Woe is me poet or possessed--Never shall Qurayshsay this of me!
I will go to the top of the mountain and throw myself down that I may kill myself and gain rest.
So I went forth to do so and then when I was midway on the mountain, I heard a voice.from heaven saying, "O Muhammad! thou art the apostle of God and I am Gabriel."
I raised my head towards heaven to see (who was speaking), and lo, Gabriel in the form of a man with feet astride the horizon, saying, "O Muhammadl thou art the apostle of God and I am Gabriel."...
then he parted from me and I from him, returning to my family. And I came to Khadija and sat by her thigh and drew close to her. She said, "O Abél-Qsim,' where hast thou been? By God, I sent my messen gers in search ofthec, and they reached the high ground above Mecca and returned to me." (T. I said to her, "Woe is me poet or posseSSed." She said, "I take refuge in God from that O Abül-Qisim.
God would not treat you thus snce he knows yourtruthfulness, your great trustworthiness, your fine character, and your kindness. This cannot be, my dear. Perhaps you did see something."
"Yes, I did," I said.) Then I told her of what I had seen; and she said, "Rejoice, O son of my uncle, and be of good heart. Verily, by Him in whose hand is Khadija's soul, I have hope that thou wilt be the prophet of this people."*
Then she rose and gathered her garments about her and set forth to her cousin Waraqa b. Naufal b. Asad b. 'Abdu'l "Uzz b. Qu_ayy, who had become a Christian and read the scriptures and learned from those that follow the Torah and the Gospel.
And when she related to him what the apostle of God told her he had seen and heard, Waraqa cried, Holy! Holy! Verily by Him in whose hand is Waraqa's soul,if thou hast spoken to me the truth, O Khadija, therchathoo me unto him the greatest Namus (T. meaning Gabriel) who came to Moses afore time, and lo, he is the prophet of this people. Bid him be of good heart.
So Khadija returned to the apostle of God and told him what Waraqa had said. (T. and that calmed his fears somewhat.) And when the apostle of God had finished his period of seclusion and returned (to Mecca), in the frst place he performed the circumambulation of the Ka'ba, as was his wont.
While he was doing it, Waraqa met him and said, "O son of my brother, tell me what thou hast seen and heard.' The apostle told hum, and Waraqa said, 'Surely, by Him in whose hand is Waraqa's soul, thou art the prophet of this people. There hath come unto thee the greatest Namus, who camme unto Moses. Thou wilt be called a liar, and they wil use thee despite fully and cast thee out and fight against thee. Verily, if I live to see that day, I willhelp God insuch wise as He knoweth.' Thenhe brought his head near to him and kissed his forehead; and the apostle went to his own house. (T. Waraqa's words added to his confidence and lightened his anxiety.)
Ibn Kathir:
The first indication of revelation to the Messenger of God (SAAS) came in the form of true visions in his sleep. Every vision he had came like the breaking of dawn.
"He then developed a liking for solitude. He would spend time alone in the cave Hirz', where he would seek religious purification through devotions. He would stay there many nights and then return to his family for more provisions to continue doing so;
then he would come down to Khadija and repeat the same.
"Eventually the Truth came to him while he was there in that cave Hirs".
"The angel came and told him, 'Read!' He replied, 'I don't read.' He then said, 'The angel then overpowered me and choked me until I could bear it no more, and then he released me. Again he said, 'Read!' Again I replied, 'I don't read.' Once more he overpowered me and choked me till I could bear it no more, then he released me and said, 'Read!' I replied, 'I don't read.' Again he over- powered me and choked me a third time until I could bear it no more. Then he released me and said,
'Read in the name of your Lord who created;
He created man from a clot.
Read! Your Lord is the most noble, He who taught by the pen.
He taught man what he did not know' (sarat al-'Alaq, XCVI, v.1-5).
"The Messenger of God (SAAS) returned home with this, his heart palpitating. He went in to Khadija, daughter of Khuwaylid, and said, 'Wrap me up! Wrap me up!' They did so until the terror left him. "He then spoke to Khadija, telling her what had happened, saying, 'I was afraid for myself.'
"Khadija replied, 'Oh no! I swear by God He would never abuse you. You maintain family ties, yon are hospitable to guests, you support the weak, provide for the poor and help out when tragedy strikes.'
"Khadija then humed off with hi to Waraqa b. Nawfal b. Asad b. 'Abd al-Wzzit, who was her cousin. He had earlier become a Christian, and used to write the Hebrew script, copying out from the Bible in Hebrew whatever God inspired him to write.
He was an old man by then, and he was blind. "Khadija told him, '0 cousin! Listen to your nephew!' Waraqa then addressed him, '0 nephew, what did you see?' The Messenger of God (SAAS) then told him what he had seen.
Waraqa commented, 'This was the angel Gabriel who used to come down to Moses. How I wish I were a young man again! I hope I am still alive when your people exile you!'
The Messenger of God (SAAS) exclaimed, 'Are they to exile me?' 'Yes,' he replied, 'no one has ever received what you have without being treated as an enemy. If I am alive when your time comes, I will give you every help.'
Sahih Muslim 160a:
The first (form) with which was started the revelation to the Messenger of Allah was the true vision in sleep. And he did not see any vision but it came like the bright gleam of dawn.
Thenceforth solitude became dear to him and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira', where he would engage in tahannuth (and that is a worship for a number of nights) before returning to his family and getting provisions again for this purpose.
He would then return to Khadija and take provisions for a like period, till Truth came upon him while he was in the cave of Hira'.
There came to him the angel and said:
Recite,
to which he replied: I am not lettered.
He took hold of me [the Apostle said] and pressed me, till I was hard pressed; thereafter he let me off and said: Recite.
I said: I am not lettered.
He then again took hold of me and pressed me for the second time till I was hard pressed and then let me off and said: Recite,
to which I replied: I am not lettered.
He took hold of me and pressed me for the third time, till I was hard pressed and then let me go and said:
Recite in the name of your Lord Who created, created man from a clot of blood.
Recite. And your most bountiful Lord is He Who taught the use of pen,
taught man what he knew not (al-Qur'an, xcvi. 1-4).
Then the Prophet returned therewith, his heart was trembling, and he went to Khadija and said: Wrap me up, wrap me up! So they wrapped him till the fear had left him. He then said to Khadija: O Khadija! what has happened to me? and he informed her of the happening, saying: I fear for myself.
She replied: It can't be. Be happy. I swear by Allah that He shall never humiliate you. By Allah, you join ties of relationship, you speak the truth, you bear people's burden, you help the destitute, you entertain guests, and you help against the vicissitudes which affect people.
Khadija then took him to Waraqa b. Naufal b. Asad b. 'Abd al-'Uzza, and he was the son of Khadija's uncle, i. e., the brother of her father. And he was the man who had embraced Christianity in the Days of Ignorance (i. e. before Islam) and he used to write books in Arabic and, therefore, wrote Injil in Arabic as God willed that he should write.
He was very old and had become blind Khadija said to him: O uncle! listen to the son of your brother.
Waraqa b. Naufal said: O my nephew! what did you see? The Messenger of Allah, then, informed him what he had seen, and Waraqa said to him: It is Namus that God sent down to Musa. Would that I were then (during your prophetic career) a young man. Would that I might be alive when your people would expel you! The Messenger of Allah said: Will they drive me out? Waraqa said: Yes. Never came a man with a like of what you have brought but met hostilities. If I see your day I shall help you wholeheartedly.
I never knew that the evidence suggests that all the early islamic religion literature was in the Levant
I think every Muslim should be made to swear by Allah and his prophet before they speak.
You could say Vegas is a major pagan pilgrimage today.
With all the historical evidence you have brought forward to seemingly shape Islam into a made up religion, the only other way in which to quash any form of argument would be to somehow deduce as to who or which people would have benefitted from doing so. Sort of like, "following the money trail". Your clarity and calmness under such sensitive topics can only be from someone who has been chosen to "guide" people searching for the truth. God Bless.
May I suggest you connect with Jay Smith . The world's only degreed Islamism expert and his work online. 20 + years at Speakers corner with several severe attacks on his person. A true Braveheart of the Lord and fearless in telling the truth.
Farid refuting his own fantasies and narratives in his own head while asleep and awake while in a dream or in the astral plane
Awesome
Any idea when the term "Muslim" was, in fact, first used to refer specifically to the religion of the Mohammedans/Saracens/Arabs/Ishmaelites (though I think that last isn't accurate)?
My problem with Quran is that (supposed) word of god is so vague that it requires interpretation to this day!
and yes trinity ,the basic concept of christianity and supposedly judaism is not so easy to understand
@@user-up3il9wx3dRun away from the question.
@@Valconizeso u r telling the Bible doesn't require interpretation
@@user-up3il9wx3d There's a difference between interpretation and vagueness. You can't interpret vague verses because they lack detail. Interpretation text assumes that there is more context that can be included to better understand a text. But vague verses have no interpretation. As it's said in Surah Al-Imran 7 (3:7), only Allah knows the meaning of the vague verses. So these vague verses are NOT interpretatable.
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "Christians have no objective methodology or standard"
Christians: "where do your 37 qurans and 600,000 hadiths say there are 10 qira'ats?
Abdul Alonzo Harris: 😷
Christians: "where do your 37 qurans and 600,000 hadiths say allah has ONLY one self?"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: 😷
Christians: "where do your 37 qurans and 600,000 hadiths say he cannot enter creation?"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: 😷
Christians: "abdul, can you answer any questions?"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "my silence is my objective standard"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "show me one muslim scholar who says there is more than one quran"
muslim scholar hythem sidky: "saying there is only 1 quran falls under the umbrella of lying to children"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "show me 2 muslim scholars who say there is more than one quran"
🤣🤣🤣
one of your best videos 100%
Islam dies when the truth starts
Damnnn what a good reply video .Good points too ofcmost of this is new to me
Powerful stuff.
If Farid has a brain, he must surely be beginning to cotton on by now. Dude: it’s over.
Could you do a discussion on what the Koran would look like if you took out all the parts of the Koran that contradicted with the bible and Torah? Just never heard it discussed.
why bother, the result would be a 10 page pamphlet with no / even less form, order, and clarity of the text than it is now
just read The Bible, why read a book that is desperately trying to pass off as a duplicate (with bonus pagan traditions and different, evil diety in the center of its' worship), that was made up by an illiterate senile beggar several centuries later
😂 when you say allah it comes out allar!!!
Hollar hollar,
Anybody that rejects allar allar
Pray to your heavenly Father Father
Say ameeeeeennn!!😂
Without lie Islam die
No water......Nothing under mecaaaa😮😂😂😂😂😂
He never gave up wtf. He’s making fun of your argument
that might be his coping mechanic after getting demolished repeatedly.
@@emprah387 not rly. Pointing out the absurdity of an argument is a good way of falsifying it.
We Christians must continue to speak to Muslims one to one and share Christ. Many are believing.
Farida would never debate you Chris. Last time I seen Farida debate was with Jai, and She keep running into other topic, unwilling to touch the main topic.
Lol Faridah 😂
It's as easy as this!....
Injil, Isa Dawah script
Response: prove Jesus Christ was incarnate, with an injil, followers (Christians), and all the Prophets between Moses & Jesus Christ, were all around during the time of Moses (7:155-157)!
Trinity Dawah script
Response: Al-Lah doesn't dispute the concept of the Trinity, only if the Triune concept applies to Al-Lah, but Al-Lah, Isa, and Maryam have nothing to do with the Trinity, so who cares whether Al-Lah is triune or not, 6:78 proves who Al-Lah is!
That's checkmate, debate in its entirety is over!
How can I contact you?
I wish to share significant information regarding the matter of "Arab Identity" and how Arabism is key to understand the development of Islam.
I think by email
Ah yes, the whole “Islam is rich in history,” “Arabic is such a rich language” blahblahblah. Neither are true. Islam has to borrow history to have any at all and arabic borrows words. Even their god and kabaa are borrowed. Where’s the richness?
Regarding the Islamic Dilemma, Muslims sometimes respond with 2:79
Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: "This is from Allah," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.
Is this saying that the scriptures are corrupted? Then what?
It’s a horrible refutation.
@@πιστότητα No, I need more. I can't just say that. Why doesn't it work? They seem pretty convinced that it's a strong refutation.
@@999DMHMIts great. Ibn Abbas (RA) comments on this verse, and associates Christians and Jews to be the people to write up their own stuff
@@999DMHM can you provide me a alternate way to contact you ?
No need to mock the Muslim, although it is milder than what the Muslims do.
Come on Chris, if there was a donkey that could fly, then surely a machine could produce olive trees. Praise the Lord that as Christians, we don’t have to make up such nonsense.
Farid thee Afraid, triple no no no negative say’s da shaky finger ☝️
22:27 the differences aren't intentional - they're accidental
eg Exodus 4:6 برصاء vs Surah 20:22 بَيْضَآءَ
or "white" could reflect a paraphrase at the time
The Septuagint reads leprous as snow, and the Quran usually follows a Septuagint understanding of the Old Testament.
The Hebrew reads "leprous as snow" .
The Septuagint reads "as snow".
The Peshitta often follows the Septuagint but reads "leprous as snow" in this case.
Interestingly, Targum Onqelos reads "white as snow". So I think the quran follows a paraphrase in this case.
However, the letter ر in the Hijazi Mayl and Kufic script is quite small and could resemble a dotless ta.
I recognize that what I am about to say has nothing to do with the topic but...
Someone needs to tell Farid to stop cutting his own hair.
I’ll respond to Farid. Most of the Hadith should be thrown out.
farid flounders is finished
Islam started just like any other Christian heresy - by throwing a temper tantrum over the trinity
He was supposed to answer the question about his god , how he cam only through the girl and where and which part of birth canal he got different types of Nature
Al takiya
The past is the problem. The past can not be changed. It doesn't matter if I am happy or unhappy because if I am alive the story continues. Atheism is wrong. Why persist in the mistake? If God exists the truth is God exists. It is better that God exists. It is better that eternity exists and life has a meaning and a purpose. The universe was created from something incredibly powerful and intelligent. God is unbelievable. God created the universe after existing forever. God is impossible to understand. How can something create the universe after existing forever? It's not possible to understand. Time is eternal. Time always existed. Time created the universe after existing forever. Why? Why would God create life? What's the point? Being God why would you create life after existing forever? I think Spinoza was right and God created the universe from self. All is God. God is transforming. God is alive. We are constantly observed and listened. The idea of God is not a joke. Because God is necessary many people are deceived, for real, for eternity. The truth that saves literally your life is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. I am not asking you to believe me, but to discover the truth for yourself thinking for yourself being honest. If God exists it is not going to stop existing because reality is ignored. Is your life in danger now? Humanity have to understand God exists because from nothing can not be created something. Reality is eternal. It is urgent the debate ends to save lives. You choose. Thank you.
Who wrote the bible 300 years after jesus death 😂😂😂😂
Which books were written 300 years after Jesus' death?
New Testament
Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John)
Mark: c. 65-70 CE
Matthew and Luke: c. 80-90 CE
John: c. 90-100 CE
Acts of the Apostles
Acts: c. 80-90 CE
Pauline Epistles (Romans, Corinthians, Galatians, etc.)
Written by Paul: c. 50-60 CE
General Epistles
Hebrews: c. 60-90 CE
James: c. 40-60 CE
Peter: c. 60-90 CE
John and Jude: c. 80-100 CE
Revelation
Revelation: c. 95-100 CE
No one. The New Testament was completed long before that.
Clearly, you are from the Duhwah branch of Islam
So what Farid! Thousands attested to what the apostles said about Jesus.
Acts 2:22 & 41 “Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know- “
“So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.”
@@gregorytremain4086 dude, Jesus was became man and inhabit among us. John 1. What is wrong with you guys?
The strength of your argument is revealed by your citing of Dan Gibson. And of course there is paralellisms between Mecca and Jerusalem, Muslims freely admit this. The Quran repeatedly invokes parallelisms between Muhammad (ﷺ) and earlier revelations and faithfuls of God. This strengthens our position if you possessed a modicum of thought.
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "Father, Son and Holy Spirit are three Gods"
Christians: "bismillah al-rahman al-rahim is three gods"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: "allah, rahman and rahim are the names of the same god referring to the attributes of allah"
Christians: "Father, Son and Holy Spirit are the names of the same God referring to the persons of God"
Abdul Alonzo Harris: 👺
Oof...
plz protect apus from farid ,he made 55 videos of him and apus never responded
Hard to tell if you are legit. First, it is not "apus", his YT moniker is "AP." Second, why would AP respond to Farid? 90% of the persons who demonstrate interest in polemics know Farid is a lying fool...and answering a fool according to his folly is a waste of time.
@@silvesan9162 who are these 90% ,do u even realize that your argument is so bad ,what a great way of dodging argument ,just say he is a liar and a fool ,what happens to all your anti islamic scholors who say things quite comfotably in their video but when they debate muslim scholar they start shaking ,remember 3 vs 1 with uthman ,your scared shamoun was shaking .