Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Pinaka III : India’s attempt to match long range artillery force of China
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 июн 2023
- PLA’s Artillery threat
China has deployed advanced long-range rocket launcher near LAC. One of the Chinese artillery brigade is stationed 5,200 metres (17,000 feet) above sea level in Xinjiang military district. It is expected to be a long-range rocket launcher that can carry multiple 300mm [12-inch] or even bigger rockets with more than 100km of firing range. Over the years, China has developed several rocket systems with different ranges and the journey began in late 1990s.
Chinese Smerch - A100
In 1997 China received a small number of Soviet Smerch multiple launch artillery rocket systems which was the most powerful multi-rocket system of its time. Eventually, China reversed engineered Smerch to develop its own indigenous rocket system which is called A100. The A100 artillery rocket system has 10 launch tubes for 300 mm artillery rockets. It is claimed that the A100 MLRS has a maximum range of 120 km, versus 90 km of improved Russian Smerch. It takes 8 minutes to prepare a launcher vehicle for firing. Once the rockets are launched it leaves its firing position within 2 minutes. Launcher vehicle is fitted with a satellite navigation system, to provide a real-time positioning data. This system can launch single rockets or full salvo. The A100 has underwent trial by the Chinese army, however PHL03 rocket system was selected which is also a close copy of the Smerch. The PHL03 is also a 300mm rocket with 12 launch tubes and range between 70-130 km. It is being replaced by new version PHL-16.
The Pakistan army has 450 plus Chinese A100 systems, mostly produced in Pakistan under its Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO).
Chinese A200
The A200 is China’s Precision Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System(GMLRS) and upgraded version of A100. It is equipped with strapdown inertial navigation and GPS, and adds a front wing to control the flight trajectory. The rocket has maximum range of 290 km.
Chinese A300 rocket
The Chinese A300 rocket is one of the latest artillery rocket systems of China. It is capable of firing rockets of different calibres which means it can also use pods of A200 and possibly other calibers. The A200 rockets have maximum range of 200 km. The A300 rocket has a maximum range to 290 km and can carry a 150 kg warhead. The rocket uses inertial and GPS guidance systems with CEP between 30 to 45 meters.
The launcher vehicle carries 2 pods with four 300 mm rockets each. Launcher is capable of single or salvo firing. It takes 50 seconds to launch a full salvo of 8 rockets. China also claims that each rocket can be targeted individually which means the A300 can hit up to 8 different targets simultaneously.
PHL-16 : Chinese HIMARS
The Chinese Type PCL-191 or PHL-16 is the most advanced long-range multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) of China and can be considered has Chinese HIMARS. It is a modular system, and can use pods with 370 mm or 300 mm guided rockets.
The system can carry two 750mm Fire Dragon 480 tactical ballistic missiles, each with a range of up to 500km, or eight 370mm (1412 inch) rockets, each with a range of 350 km (220 miles)
300mm Long Range Guided Rocket
At present India does not have indigenous 300mm rocket but has an imported one. Indian Army (IA) has 62 x BM-30 Smerch systems. The erstwhile Ordnance Factory Board has produces several rocket variants for the system.
Smerch is a 300mm single stage rocket with a larger payload and smaller range. Indian army uses 4 variants of these rockets which are having maximum range between 70-90 km. In January 2023, Indian army has released an RFI for the life extension of these rockets by private firms.Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @indiandefenseanalysis
**WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
Most of the pictures clip or BGM included in the Video
Belongs to their Respected Owners and we do not claim rights.
We are using them under following act:
UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM,
COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT
OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
Follow us on social media:
/ analysisdefense
indiandefensea...
==============THANKS FOR WATCHING!================
PLEASE LIKE SHARE & SUBSCRIBE: "INDIAN DEFENSE ANALYSIS"
![Finesse2Tymes & Og Boo Dirty - Real Recognize Real [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3xb4bl5PWF8/mqdefault.jpg)
DRDO’s development lifecycle means your grandchildren will see the prototype in Aero India ✌️
The pinaka development has always been on time
@@sarants4488 these 10th failed kids won't understand bro..they think are smarter than DRDO😂😂😂
Introducing a new technology is not the same as making a RUclips video 😂. There will be many factors to be considered like time, technology, politics, budget, resources... Etc.
@@rohannanda3622 Please read the CAG report on DRDO. Pretty sure they’re well educated.
But if you need help to interpret that report you could always find a therapy center to help you with your special needs 🙂
@@srikanth85in Right bro ... These guys are blind followers DRDO without logic. Though the deleyed development is not only for DRDO , government, armed forces and production companies are also involved in these.
Even countries like Turkey which has one forth of GDP of India are developing weapons before time .
I wonder what our armed forces spent 20 billion of Capital expenditure which is more than double of Pakistans entire Budget.
Finally we acknowledge that we were backward as compared to china
Please ack that you are a dud and an embarrassment.
That's first step
Many steps need to be taken
Its Prime Minister Modi Fault.
@@kskandaraaj4643😂khangress Bot!!
@@kskandaraaj4643 is it?? Congress was against any domestic manufacturing of weapons.Are you nuts or what??
When our late Defence Minister Mr. George Fernandes said either in 1999 or in 2000, that our real enemy is China and not Pakistan, the entire country laughed at him and made fun of him. Irrespective of any political party, all called him a person who has lost his mind. Now, who is laughing looking at this hectic project being launched? Just imagine had Galwan not happened, whatever progress we are seeing now, even that would not have happened. The entire 90's and till mid 2000s, China has gone so far ahead of us that it will be very, very difficult to catch up with them in the long run. In every aspect, the Chinese military is far ahead in terms of military hardware. I am not sure when it comes to actual battle how much guts they will have to face death like our boys, but still, even if we win against them, it will come at a very heavy cost 😢😢😢.
Until or unless we don't get a jhatka our people dosen't take anything seriously!
It's a hard truth about us Indian's, No doubt smart ones leave the Country and live somewhere else.
Didn't you know? China capture hundreds of your gutless soldiers! China patched them up and fed them with cow piss.
Exactly
@@ineedpowers5151Cant even write a sentence correctly.
IND!A L0ST AR0UND 1.000 KM2 LAND C0NTR0LS AFTER 2020 GALWAN CLASH T0 CH!NA!!!
G00D LUCK REND!A!!!
😊😊😊😄😄😄🤭🤭🤭
🚩 ... जय हिंदुत्व ... 🙏
🇮🇳 ... जय भारत ... 💪
The Chinese, being stupid people, have reverse engineered every single Russian/Soviet weapon system from guns and artillery to submarines, jet fighters, jet engines and even spacecraft. As a result, they have the full line of weapons that outrange anything India has. These weapons are available to Pakistan. India's DRDO/DPSUs, being superior intelligent "scientists", refused to reverse engineer anything, preferring to re-invent everything from screws and bolts to the full system. As a result, we don't have our own engines, submarines, guns, long range rocket systems, UAVs---the bread and butter war fighting requirements, making us the world's largest importer of weapons. The only successes we have had are from the private industry that produced the ATAGS and fast patrol boats but gorment refuses to allow them to compete. What to do.
Even fakistan have 150km range MBRLS☹️India still using 45km, 60km and 75km pinakas☹️
😄😄🦧🦍🐫🐷🐮🐮🐮🐽🐽🐘
Which one
@@lyteabhishek Fatah 1
@@SQBghost68764 there is no official details of fatah - 1 is out. It hasn't been displayed, our specifications released. 150 KM is MBRL is pipe dream for Pakistan. Just somebody said it's doesn't mean anything if they themselves haven't released it's any specifications. Also if it is that good why countries buying pinaka and not fatah -1
@@lyteabhishek what about china 🙂? Our pinaka is nothing in front of them😔😔😔
Congratulations to DRDO Scientists . Jai Bharat 😊❤
China has sophisticated drone systems,drone network wide range of drones for operations we must ensure china never dominates us we lost during nehru due to this reason itself they were well ahead of us.
not true. We lost because Nehru didnt want to fight and instigate China further.
@@vinsin328china at that time had modern automatic rifles while indian still mostly used bolt action rifles.
Pinaka is an indigenously built HIMARS by DRDO. India zindabad.
India should increase Research and Development in Defense sector to face China and Pakistan together in a war
Imagine Chinese rockets can reach 300km while Indian tactical missiles reach 300km. Tactical missiles are costly and less in number. PLA can deny IA an area 300km from their launchpad while we sacrifice our Jawans to reach closer to them to reach firing position for our Smerch and low range Pinakas. Even Pakistan is procuring these from China.
I see in this video the chinese soldiers are Rushing towards the artillery to prepare firing.
But i see in some videos indian soldiers goose jumping around before they get ready for firing. I hope this act is not used in real war😂
No just a exercise which Indian army does .....seen them in real action operating ....no such steps .....
@@puneethpalan272 are you sure? Are u army personnel?
It's not attempt but work in progress. India don't have any option but to match the Chinese if India wants it's boundary secure. China is atleast 10 years ahead of us. But India is catching up and quickly.
All india needs is bigger navy fleet swld proppelled artillery
More like 30 ish years. In Q2 ish of 2024, they'll field ASMLs competitor by SMEE that's the endgame of the west.
How is this system different from Maheshwarastra 1&2 being developed by Solar Group. If both are of same category then why Drdo started this project. Or Solar group were lying and they are not developing anything called 'Maheshwarastra'???
Or maybe the DRDO want to get more funding..
Pipe dreams
HAL, DRDO, ADA and Allied ordenance factories are like strangulating local private industries. They wont allow local private industry in this lucrative market of defence. But keep bleeding nation by take all funds, delaying and giving out mediocre products to armed forces in 2-3 decades when they already obsolete like INSAS, Arjun tank, LCA, Kali weapons, or RUSTOM fancy UACV. When penny dropped by armed forces, defence ministers signs import deal. Keeping all Indian industry devoid of this eco system. These State military industrial complexes are full of communist cadres. ISRO is no different but they do little better on comparison as comes under PMO but output to mobey spent is like paying U$1 million and getting Amassder car in 20 years! But hey beat chest as its MADE IN INDIA!! 💪
Some youtube's started referring GE pact with US on Engine manufacturing final and it will be for AMCA Mark ll, even they are referring that it will be final engine for AMCA mark ll and there will not be any deal with RR and French company... Could you please clarify on this, does our GE 414 manufacturing deal kills our dream of developing our own engine with partner? There is a lot of confusion going on GE 414 engine deal
I have explained all the engine deals here. But if you still have any question, feel free to reply on my comment:
ruclips.net/video/fHXxdZeZnPI/видео.html
Just buy a "couple of squadrons" of Rafales and smash them.🤣 😂
Wait for 2040 .
Brahmos is a supersonic cruise missile but ms 2 is a rocket power missile. Brahmos range is now 600 km and 1000 km in future with cep of 1 m. Rocket power missile cep is 10 m
For the targets being discussed, we don't need the range and accuracy of Brahmos. And if it's needed we have it with us. So, having a 300mm caliber Pinaka system with range of 100 to 120 km is of absolute importance.
dreams are dreams...unless someone try make them reality..
The main problem is DRDO scientists are trying ; however trying only is not enough. They have lot of stumbling blocks to overcome. So it's better to handover research to LNT TATA or Kalyani. They have more capable and patriotic engineers and scientists.
Dasguptaji, you are aware that Kalyani has taken decision to develop several categories of artillery equipment. What prevents them or for that matter any other Indian company to initiate development of rocket artillery ?
True ..Tata & Kalyani has more Patriotic Engineers ..n led by patriotic Leaders
INDIA🇮🇳🤝🇦🇲ARMENIA 🇮🇳🤝🇦🇲 🇮🇳🤝🇦🇲 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀Pinaka👍👍 ✊✊✊✊💪💪💪💪
Get cracking brother 🚀🚀🚀
Our education , research and analysis system are failed or outdated ..
India should not try to match China and Pakistan rather Drdo should try to develop 300_500 km range rocket system as soon as possible.
Good morning bro 🌄
it is very very amazig indian future weapon technology!
rocket price should be in lacks, in order to launch salvos.
MADE IN BARATHA MORE HI TECHNOLOGY ADVANCED ARTILLERY ROCKETS LAUNCHERS MORE NEEDED RANGE'S 250 KMS TO 450 AND 600 KMS WITH NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES ETC.👍 JAY HIND JAY HIND JAY HIND JAY HIND JAY HIND JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY BARATH JAY
It's very difficult to match the chinese rocket artillery range
we always assume chinese has copy or third grade technology which will not work in war. But it is a assumption.
In 1962, before war IB assumed china lacks militiary power compared to India. Which cost alot for India i think we are repeating the same mistake again.
nope, IB hadn't reported such but, it was political blunder by nehru who got relaxed after signing Five Principles of Peaceful Co-existence and act like ostrich. indian army repeatedly urge the requirment at borders but nehru who lost the war to a lesser opponent...but, india taught them gud lessen in 67,78 and recently at galwan....so, we can say now to knew them enough abt their capability in field.
@@raj-hf4wb yes nehru believed way too much on them. But it is good to make friendship with neighbouring countries. Think about Germany, France and UK. It was grave yard before 1945. Now they are maintaining friendship by making other nations fight each other.
IB must have given the chinese status because it was only agency we had in 62. They underestimated chinese power, to be honest India was not ready to fight a war. As always we have good number of soldiers with old era equipments which is no use.
@@ibrahimmohamed9210 indeed,indian army was not prepared but it was decision of only a man .."v.k Menon" has mentioned it in his book in detail ABT indo-sino relation and role of army. Cud u believe nehru was such a naive he didn't want army but only police force.
Well, india want gud relation with all its neighbour but China expansionist policy is problem,they advance inch-inch and negotiation on table. This is whr india have apprehension.
Jay Hind
Jay Bharat 🙏
it is not DRDO
.but govt ..who dont want ..they need comission frm foreign arm dealers..so stop Blaming DRDO..govt is the real culprit..
जय श्री राम जय जय सियाराम जय श्री हनुमान
Range is very less compare to China's MBRL 500 kM😮
China mbrl real range is 150 km but with fire dragon ballistic missile it's range is 400 km
@@srfsongs3041well, it can be matched by prithvi ballistic missiles. With a range of 500 km + 350 kg warhead.
@@aksworldinfo it's already match by pralay srbm range 500 km warhead 500 to 1000 kg
@@srfsongs3041
500 km is not rocket artillery but a ballistic or cruise missile.
India is ok on the ballistic missile and cruise missile front with Prithvi I, II and III and a bunch of sub sonic and super sonic cruise missiles.
@@mth469 pralay srbm range 500 km
JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN JAY JAWAN JAY KISIAN
TB 2 🤤🤤😋😋
Drdo is impotent by various Government, reason is simple , lobbying of foreign Manufacturers.
Even today we are buying drones from USA at very high prices. This is just maintain defence relations nothing else.
DRDO s rocket,Stealth fighters and other paper projects are amazing and will be in service .But that would happen after I die a natural death By the way I am just 36..
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
I would be glad to see if they can create a proper pensil indegiously ON TIME.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
PINAKA in Filipino means 'the Most' what should be the most things on this military hardware?
we didn't derive the name from the source u said..btw wt is philipino ?
@@raj-hf4wb too much bobs and vagene causes brain deterioration bro, if i were you read comments TWICE before bark like a dog MADARCHOD
Bhai Hindi me video banao....Indian logo ko samaz aana chahiye...hindi jaldi samaz me aata hai
Bhai hindi channel bhi hai , videos will be released soon, team is working on that.
link: www.youtube.com/@IDA-Hindi
China is already ahead but feel good kool aid Indians : Sab changa si 😂
The way Russian armor is being torn to pieces in Ukraine gives a hint of what one can expect on the modern battle field.
From suicide drones to precision strike artillery shots to...etc. Death comes from everywhere and unexpectedly.
Nothing worse to see German leopard tank blown into piece
Unless it's a joint venture, DRDO has a bad track record of timeline. Still their pinaka, naag is to see serial production.
We must employ the sudarshan chakra...we can finish China.
Kay sab China pahle develop karega uske bad hi hame our amare DRDO KO HOSH AYE GA KAY, WHAT A SHAME. HOW WE SHOULD DEPEND ON RUSSIA
I am a fan of indian defence analysis, but i have only one problem, i have a feeling it overestimated chinese capabilities. I am not an expert but based on what I have read in other journals I have formed my opinion.
Can you please explain, if anybody has seen any demonstration of these exaggerated capabilities.
Do you think pakistan will sit quiet with these capabilities
Never under estimate your enemy, it’s even ok to over estimate. That’s how deterrence in defence is built.
Unlike China Pakistan don’t have money to fuel the war. Forget war it even can’t do war games
@@IndianDefenseAnalysis
Ok. Agree.
But out of curiosity I am asking, can you tell us if any demonstration of any kind has ever been done.
On the other hand india maintains secrecy as opposed to chinese publicity
Would appreciate if you make a video about tall claims od chinese capabilities.
Thank you
Long overdue
MAKE IN INDIA 🇮🇳
Vayu Sena should be looking to retire Smerch and Grad, which are now obsolete. The future is Pinaka/Pralay/Prahaar. Maheshwarastra 1&2 being developed by Solar Group seem to fill the same niche as DRDO 300km range Pinaka, are they both the same project or two different ones? What with Israeli LORA missile and existing indigenous missiles, Rossiya's rockets should be sold off. There is no news about Prahaar, has that been inducted? With IIT Madra's ramjet shell, and long range glide bombs, the short distance seems to be well covered. Even loitering munitions are also effective in this range. Even against the PHL-16 : Chinese HIMARS which can carry two 750mm Fire Dragon 480 tactical ballistic missiles, each with a range of up to 500km, or eight 370mm rockets, each with a range of 350 km. Existing drones with 500km range or Pralay can answer this particular HIMARS style rocket wagon.
China has more superior logistics. They are building for a war against US and EU. India is a weaker opponent for them. India needs to not only come with new weapons but increase production to 3-4 times the current levels. Moreover we are limited by our limited funding. Also current government is weakening the social fabric by making hate comments etc. So we are weak internally. We are a great civilization culture wise but have failed in protecting our borders historically. Our military personnel are noble but our bureaucrats and politicians are not.
China is much ahead in improved the pinaka long back.
True, thief and dacoit are always ahead of honest people .
Description was a bit uninspiring.
please let us know any suggestion for improvement
How easily one say 8 crore it should be in lakhs, think about real war scenario where one need lakhs of such rounds
india can easily match..
Did they test them in a real war?
You want China to test them on India?
Why such boring delivery for your video about rockets?? 😴
Boycott Chinese goods services and applications and buy Indian goods services and applications which helps Indian economy to grow fast
But what about our government WHy does it allow china imports when someone starts manufacturing here 35 government departments demand bribe and harass why it does not apply to Chinese imports
@@angryindian7568 India IA a member of WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION who are members of this group can import and export to each and other country with out high import tax
India don't have production capabilities
Where it is in initial stages
@Rakesh If china doesn't allow our cheap pharmaceutical and finished steel so can we
@@angryindian7568 lol Indian products has no comparison with cheap Chinese products
Missiles are the modern answers to artillery or even tanks. The initial strategic strikes have to accurate ans with missiles. known weapons can do the follow up
BUT THERE R CRORES OF SECULAR PIECEFUL TERRORIST ABRAHAMICS TERRORIST INSIDE INDIA NEED TO ELIMINATE THEM FIRST THEN ALL WILL BE PROTECTED V URGENTLY NEED HINDAVI RASHTRA AS ENVISIONED BY LORD GOD CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ AND CHATRAPATI SHAMBHAJI MAHARAJ TO SAVE HINDUS N BHARATMATA JAI BHAVANI JAI SHIVAJI JAI SHAMBHAJI JAI HINDAVI RASHTRA BHARATMATA KI JAI VANDE MATARAM
JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI JAY MODI JI
Feku modi jhumlebaj modi
Pianaka ko ghatia junk chinese weapon se compare mat karo vai ,pinaka is battle proven technology in 1999 kargil war,chinese multi barrel rocket system are not battle tested even unka test kya real ya fake hai yevi koi nahi janta hai kyunki chinese communist gvt khali positive propaganda karti hai though wo fake ho kitnavi
Indians are passionate about comparing weapons, but in fact, India has never experienced a real war. In war, weapons are secondary. The true strength is the supply in war and the fighting will of soldiers. In China, military personnel are known as the "cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: without a country, there is no home, and military personnel are the backbone of the country. Thank you to our brave soldiers of the People's Liberation Army who are always ready to defend the border of our motherland. No matter how India develops its military, it cannot surpass China. Whether in the past, present, or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of both countries. There are too many arguments to prove, and I don't need to elaborate. You can refer to the history of both countries. Chinese people value the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not yield, resist to the death, and face death as if returning on the battlefield. If Chinese soldiers surrender on the battlefield, it is a great shame, and the spirit of dying rather than yielding is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese person. These are all things that Indians do not possess.
china hasnt had a real war in ages and the last war it fought against a weakened vietnam was a huge loss and china had to withdraw .
@@AB001DRegarding the Vietnam War - A: Since modern times, Vietnam has become a colony of French colonizers, China has become a semi colony, and the destinies of the two countries are closely related. As neighboring countries with a strip of water, they are interdependent and brotherly. A group of revolutionaries from the Vietnamese Communist Party have all had experiences of fighting in China, and the Communist Party of China and Vietnam have formed a deep fighting friendship in their respective struggles for national independence and liberation.
During the US invasion of Vietnam and the Vietnam War, both China and the Soviet Union provided assistance to Vietnam and jointly opposed the US. China sent air defense forces and engineering forces into Vietnam. After three years of fighting, it shot down and injured more than 3000 US aircraft. The People's Liberation Army sacrificed more than 1000 people and also provided a large amount of materials to Vietnam. During the thirty years of Vietnam's resistance against the United States, France, and the country, China provided approximately 20 billion US dollars in aid to Vietnam, strongly supporting Vietnam's liberation struggle.
@@AB001DRegarding the Vietnam War - B: After the end of the Vietnam War of Resistance Against the United States in 1975, leaders such as Lai Sung did not seize the opportunity to focus on healing the war wounds, restoring and developing the economy. Instead, they were carried away by victory and completely deviated from Ho Chi Minh's line. Li and his group had forcibly implemented leftist socialist transformation in the inner south, relying on the support of the Soviet Union to vigorously promote regional hegemony and attempting to piece together the "Indochinese Federation". Guided by this erroneous path, Vietnam openly opposes China. Vietnam began to exclude Chinese crazily, suppressed the normal life of overseas Chinese, and led to a large number of Vietnamese overseas Chinese returning to China. At the border between China and Vietnam, armed conflicts were provoked, and armed personnel were dispatched to cross the border to invade, injure border residents, demolish boundary markers, devour the Chinese border, and create incidents such as Punian Ridge and Tingmo Mountain. The relationship between China and Vietnam has become severe. Tear up the statement made by the Government of Vietnam in 1958 that the the Dongsha Islands, the Xisha Islands, Zhongsha Islands and the Nansha Islands belong to China, and occupy more than 96% of China's the Nansha Islands.
In order to maintain border security, on February 14, 1979, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China publicly issued a notice to the whole country: preparing to start self-defense and counterattack operations. This is neither a declaration of war nor a surprise attack, which is unique in the world and demonstrates to the world that China's war against Vietnam is a self-defense counterattack. On February 17, 1979, along the Sino Vietnamese border, ten thousand guns fired in unison, marking the official start of the self-defense counterattack against Vietnam.
@@AB001DAbout the Vietnam War C: In the 1979 self-defense and counterattack war against Vietnam, China achieved the expected objectives of the war, disrupted the strategic deployment of the Soviet Union and Vietnam, destroyed the industry and mining industry in northern Northern Vietnam, which is of great significance for protecting China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity as well as the peace and stability of Southeast Asia and the world. China's self-defense and counterattack against Vietnam took two months, and its strategic goal was safely achieved. On May 17, 1979, the Vietnamese People's Daily published a statistical table titled "Preliminary Statistical Table of Some Visible Losses as of the End of March 1979", with excerpts as follows:
（1） Destroyed cities: Out of the total four, four were destroyed, accounting for 100%.
（2） Destroyed townships: out of a total of 320, 320 were destroyed, accounting for 100%.
（3） The area of destroyed houses in the city is 600000 square meters.
（4） Number of people losing their homes in the city: 150000.
（5） Forty five thousand destroyed houses in rural areas.
（6） Number of people losing their homes in rural areas: 200000.
（12） Damaged hospitals and health stations: 428 out of a total of 430 were destroyed, accounting for 99.5%. Among them:; All four provincial-level hospitals have been destroyed, accounting for 100%; Out of the total of 26 county-level hospitals, 24 were destroyed, accounting for 92%; The total number of 400 township health stations has been completely destroyed, accounting for 100%.
（13） Damaged forest farms: Out of a total of 42, 38 were destroyed, accounting for 90%.
（14） Forty one destroyed farms and agricultural stations.
（15） Killed or robbed cattle: Out of a total of 260000 heads, 157000 were killed or robbed, accounting for 60%.
（16） Pigs killed or taken: Out of a total of 350000 pigs, 244000 were killed or taken, accounting for 80%.
In the book "Defending the Northern Border War of the Motherland in 1979- Victory and Historical Lessons", written by Dr. Chen Youhui, a member of the History of Vietnam Historical Science Association in Vietnamese towns after the war in 1979, data from the Vietnam People's Daily are also mainly quoted:
More than 30000 casualties of cadres and soldiers, and tens of thousands of civilians have died. Gaoping, Liangshan, Guantang, Laojie and other cities have been almost completely destroyed, with a total of 320 townships, 735 schools, 41 farms, 81 enterprises, and 38 forest farms damaged. About 3.5 million people in six border provinces have lost their homes, property, and means of life.
Subsequently, in 1981, China recaptured the Battle of Mount Kuolin and Mount Faka, in 1984, China recaptured the Battle of Mount Laoshan, Mount Zheyin, and Mount Balihe, and in 1984, China engaged in battles against Vietnam, including the Battle of Ba Dian, the Battle of Two Mountains, and the Battle of Defense against Vietnam.
Through the ten year Sino Vietnamese border war, the stability of China's southwestern border was maintained. For the Vietnamese side, the impact of the war was long-lasting, and the national strength suffered long-term depletion and destruction, ultimately necessitating a change in policy.
@@AB001DAbout the Vietnam War--D: Final summary: China tried its best to help Vietnam resist the attack of the United States. Contribute money, effort, and supplies. Even the soldiers of the People's Liberation Army paid the price of their lives to fight for Vietnam's independence, and the Chinese threw their heads and blood. However, after Vietnam won the victory against the United States, it immediately cooperated with the Soviet Union to do various harms to China. (Because of the hostile relationship between China and the Soviet Union) China couldn't bear this kind of betrayal of Vietnam, and it had to teach Vietnam a profound lesson, and we achieved our goal. Vietnam invaded Cambodia to cooperate with the Soviet Union to contain China, and secondly to dominate South Asia. China's self-defense counterattack against Vietnam lasted for two months. The Sino-Vietnamese border war lasted ten years. Vietnam should always remember not to piss off China. Moreover, Vietnam will always bear the title of ungrateful.