Star ship performed exceptionally well and out performed its design specifications…. The older tiles did let one flap overheat on its leading edge which was amazing… The flight went very well … Congratulations Space-X
@@phillmckill5562 yes I would, The Starship and booster completed the Flight Plan as written.. the tests Data was successfully collected and will be analyzed thoroughly.. Very Successful 😎😎😎🧐🧐
i think the flaps had been changed to titanium for this time because they can tolerate heat better and it was just another part of the testing finding out how much area needs heat shield as the nasa ships in the past most of the cost was heatshied for reentry
It's a test vehicle lol you think it's just going to nail every single landing now that it did it once....... Remember once is a fluke.@@Sarconthewolf
@@youarenotspecial It still did good and I love it, but they shouldn't leave out what actually happened at the end of the booster landing. That's all I'm saying. Hopefully they learned a lot about this test.
Early? He was supposed to have us on mars this year, and he is still blowing up the rockets he's planning on using to fuel a mother ship waiting in orbit, that hasn't even began construction. He isn't even capable of doing what NASA did 50 years ago. People still waiting on trucks they paid for 5 years ago. This might have been early, 40 years ago.
All things considered the out come was positive for verifying the limits of the ship and testing the booster return software safety limits. The in orbit engine restart was a success and the ship landed on target. Test flights don't always look pretty if you don't know what you are looking for. AWESOME JOB SPACEX TEAM! ONWARD AND UPWARD!
In 1962 America Center first man in orbit 7 1/2 years later we launched the Columbia which flew around the Moon while the eagle landed on the moon brought the astronauts back up to the Columbia and then brought them home again in 7 1/2 years SpaceX is in their 21st year and we're still cheering that they actually launched a test rocket with technology that is 1 million times more advanced than it was in 1969
You did a good job on this summary except for one thing: you did not show us or even tell us about the big explosion once the piece fell over in the water; of course 99% of the flight was over, but if it had not exploded in a fire ball, engineers would have able to examine that segment in more detail.
I think Starship 6's launch was successfull.They can now catch and land the booster and Starship next lunch for sure. By the look of it, it splashed in the ocean very smoothly. 💪💪❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸
....his brain is SOOOOOO BIG, he's got plenty to spare even after he fixes politics in America.....but thanks for your concern, even if it's misguided.....
“pushing the boundaries” how? Nothing Space X does is beyond low earth orbit, or about 400 miles. We achieved more 60 years ago. We are in the special Olympics era of space exploration today. Little accomplishment relatively.
Actually they did plan a pad landing. They were also going to catch the booster for the second time. They received some data that caused spacex to abort the pad landing and directed the rocket offshore. Not great info in this video. Sounds like an AI channel.
Thanks for the good Analysis and Speculation ... I agree ! ... This TF6 was to gather Data for the future changeover to BF Blockhead 2 Rockets .... Plus , the FAA will stay happy and Musk can Launch again in December ! ... Cheers !
I'm glad the evolution of mankind isn't up to you. You sound like you'd be too pessimistic to have a go at anything. Thank God there are men like Musk willing to try.
I guess you didn't see the one that safely landed back into the rigging where it launched? The video is at X. This one was about successful launch of this increased size and weight. It was guided to meet the water in the same vertical configuration as the landing rather than have it land into the rigging again. The data told them it achieved what he wanted to see for the bigger and heavier rocket. He has been reusing rockets, launching and landing on the same launch pad, for quite some time. No one else has.
Breaking: Musk is playing with his rockets that pollute the air and comes with a sonic boom everytime it comes back down to Earth. This is a nothing burger
While they didn’t try to catch flight 6. It was not a failure. And should not be see as such. These are early flights of starship. And are all learning and data gathering flights, and many of the flights to come will be the same. So long as they gather good info from the flight, and that info helps them in future flights. They are all successful in my opinion. SpaceX has proven everyone wrong over and over and over again. Because they learn and correct from every launch. And they make every one else look stupid. And there is nothing wrong with that. If SpaceX is better, so be it. Everyone else needs to work harder, they need to work to be better than SpaceX. And if they work harder enough and smart enough they will surpass SpaceX. And I don’t think Elon would have a problem with that. Because as Elon says. “Competition is good”.
Sorry but I see this as a partial failure. From here on out if SpaceX does not catch the booster, it's a failure. That is what the booster is designed to do.
DON'T FORGET, IT TOOK NASA 8-9 YEARS TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT SPACE-X HAS DONE IN 3, & BOEING -NASA IS NO'T WORKING YET.... *The comparison I said maybe off, but think about fact that it took NASA from about 1950 (when they got serious about Space) to 1961 from launching American V2s, Redstones, Atlas to get to Saturn I in 1961 & Saturn V in '67.*
Is this good for the environment ? Mr. Electric Cars. LMFAO !!! And how about taking care of the people on Earth 🌎 🤔. Trying to put people on Mars ? What a waste of money. Uggggg 😮😢😢😢
Afterwards George Jetson and his entire family pulled up along side of this Imaginary space craft and escorted it to Santa's Village at the North pool. Gifts were exchanged and this Imaginary craft returned and landed right in Elon's driveway. Happy Happy Happy.
They need a more compact "ship" for easy handling and recovery. And that will allow a more aerodynamic horizontal take off and landing. I think. It must be easy to produce a small model first. Better be quick before the "amateurs" do it.....
The catch is a pointless gimmick. Just land it on the skirt encircling the engines which could be similar to a hovercraft skirt.. or even land it on the engines which would be the same level as the skirt. SKIRT
They had those in the previous launch iirc, and it was a success too. Seems like this time, instead of having the rocket called back to a "designated landing pad", they tried landing WITHOUT a designated pad as if to simulate how "landing on a spot where we don't have a pad or are unable to build a pad" would turn out. (I.e, the moon, or mars) ....just a wild hunch 😶
SpaceX did well. Space Trends did a terrible job of reporting the flight. Poor editing of the narration (out of sequence) and visuals not related to this flight.😒😒
Is this a repetition of the biblical story of Babylonia? The shot was taken the and spear headed for the heavens but then fell back to earth. While 47th was watching the show, his predecessor was busy appointing new judges. Food for thought
Musk got rich conning gov.ts for grants and useless projects. Solar roads, solar cities, hyperloop, etc. All con jobs made out to be so promising. Tons of tax dollars spent on nowhere projects left to rust. Trump Nation is a con job. Pipe Dreams and broken promises.
@@johnknowlton3998 No. He's asking about the Starship -- not the booster. The flame on Starship, as its laying over in the ocean, is nothing more than excess CH4 burning off.
Congratulations to all involved. What a perfect educate for us to see aerodynamics propulsion the calculations and engineering proud to be an American. Don’t you agree?
We saw more in the 60's. It's 2024, and Spacex been at it for years. Basically we have Apollo with a lot of small engines instead of a few large ones. And that's it. Apollo 8 orbited the Earth with a crew of 3. Spacex has not even made it past low orbit. How thrilling. How genius.
Star ship performed exceptionally well and out performed its design specifications…. The older tiles did let one flap overheat on its leading edge which was amazing… The flight went very well … Congratulations Space-X
🤣🤣🤣🤣is that what you call it🤣🤣🤣
@@phillmckill5562 yes I would, The Starship and booster completed the Flight Plan as written.. the tests Data was successfully collected and will be analyzed thoroughly.. Very Successful 😎😎😎🧐🧐
@@phillmckill5562That's exactly what you call it. Unless you are a bot or a troll. So which one are you?
SpaceX learned a lot on this mission, all of which they needed to learn at some point. Better on a test flight than on a manned flight.
i think the flaps had been changed to titanium for this time because they can tolerate heat better and it was just another part of the testing finding out how much area needs heat shield as the nasa ships in the past most of the cost was heatshied for reentry
The systems did exactly what they were supposed to do! OUTSTANDING JOB SPACEX!
They didn't show the booster landing and exploding. I don't know if that was exactly what it was supposed to do.
@@Sarconthewolf It did what they planned.
It's a test vehicle lol you think it's just going to nail every single landing now that it did it once....... Remember once is a fluke.@@Sarconthewolf
@@thevet2009 Yes it did except there was a problem that made it unable to be caught.
@@youarenotspecial It still did good and I love it, but they shouldn't leave out what actually happened at the end of the booster landing. That's all I'm saying. Hopefully they learned a lot about this test.
It is best to have things go wrong in the early stages of development of such a complex project than later when peoples lives are at risk.
Early? He was supposed to have us on mars this year, and he is still blowing up the rockets he's planning on using to fuel a mother ship waiting in orbit, that hasn't even began construction. He isn't even capable of doing what NASA did 50 years ago. People still waiting on trucks they paid for 5 years ago. This might have been early, 40 years ago.
Catch or no catch... it's NEVER BORING! Great job Space X!
Divert test
All things considered the out come was positive for verifying the limits of the ship and testing the booster return software safety limits. The in orbit engine restart was a success and the ship landed on target. Test flights don't always look pretty if you don't know what you are looking for. AWESOME JOB SPACEX TEAM! ONWARD AND UPWARD!
In 1962 America Center first man in orbit 7 1/2 years later we launched the Columbia which flew around the Moon while the eagle landed on the moon brought the astronauts back up to the Columbia and then brought them home again in 7 1/2 years SpaceX is in their 21st year and we're still cheering that they actually launched a test rocket with technology that is 1 million times more advanced than it was in 1969
Overestimating on ones achievements can come back to bite one.
People see. (Most are not fools... like we all sometimes think!).
the chinese are watching this video , and watching again and again and again
They are also commenting again and again
And laughing.
Had to the actual lift came back to watch later. Not disappointed no. It’s all exciting to see. Just thankful it wasn’t nasa making the calls.
To be candid, this program is still in a data harvesting mode for system analysis and modeling: progress thus far is astounding!
Without failure there is no success.
With only failure there is no success.
Trial and error!🇺🇸
Failure is the stepping stone to success. Failure is only a result back to work
@@captain_cgc2413 ......stop talking about Dimcrats that way......
Remember the live chat on you tube for the 3rd landing failures? A mechanic is just as a genius isn't he all you X scientists? Any thanks?
Booster 6 splash down may have been the prelude to barge landing.
Not possible, it doesn't have landing legs. Legs removed to reduce overall weight.
I was on a ICBM launch crew at Vandenberg AFB in 1959. We saw some great blasts!
Congrats, SpaceX! Another milestone checked off the list!- in space Raptor relight.
Dont see what milestone they are talking about???? Could NASA do this like on the 1960s already lol
Don't give out too much information because the Chinese wants to copy
Only thing that would make it better is if Elon was on board.
You did a good job on this summary except for one thing: you did not show us or even tell us about the big explosion once the piece fell over in the water;
of course 99% of the flight was over, but if it had not exploded in a fire ball, engineers would have able to examine that segment in more detail.
Well done all around. Go SpaceX. IFT 7 Roll out of B 14 & SH 33 (V2). 🌎
This happened on my birthday..Welcome space x.
I never knew the Gulf of Mexico is in Indian Ocean, what the hell?
They were also testing less Tiles on the Craft during re-entry.
This video is all over the place.
Great content. Informative. Is it me or does the narrator sound like Sheldon
Congrats on another successful test flight !
WISH THE TOWER WAS NOT DAMAGED ON TAKE OFF
You are all amazing to bring a pencil like booster to land back on platforms or in the ocean well done just so amazing what you are all doing 🌺🌈🤗🥰❤️
Good pollution! Great job Space X!
Man this hurts because I had money on the booster landing, I believed in SpaceX and the way they strive to do unthinkable things but oh well
Very Intelligent quick Decision 💯👍
Robert A. Heinlein would be proud.
Testing, testing, this is only a test. If there had been an actual emergency.......
Nice and completed test of Starship👏👏👏🇺🇸👍✅
I think Starship 6's launch was successfull.They can now catch and land the booster and Starship next lunch for sure. By the look of it, it splashed in the ocean very smoothly. 💪💪❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸
Wondering if they go and recover the boosters and ship from the ocean later.
At last - a speaker with great diction and information.
Are other countries advised of the launch and re-entry to prevent any misunderstandings or faults alert?
well done chatgpt
it is SOOO clear this was made with AI
clickbait nonsense no new news here move on and block this fool
Excellent!
Elon needs to stay the hell out of politics and concentrate on his core businesses!!
....his brain is SOOOOOO BIG, he's got plenty to spare even after he fixes politics in America.....but thanks for your concern, even if it's misguided.....
@@AllStarSpitooner-h4r Yeah, i do, sometimes, question my guidance in today's world. As Judge Judy says, "it is so time to die"!
And the booster blew up in the ocean.
so antiquated!!!
Awesome! Maybe 2 towers one for Catch and for Take-Off? Reduce the take off risk to the tower. I know it may be cost prohibitive.
Tower two is three quarters built.😊
@@johngardiner5206, second tower is to catch the second stage (ie, "ship")
“pushing the boundaries” how? Nothing Space X does is beyond low earth orbit, or about 400 miles. We achieved more 60 years ago. We are in the special Olympics era of space exploration today. Little accomplishment relatively.
Finally, an accurate comment. This younger generation thinks that their failures are success.
word of the day Mecca Zilla😀
I really can't recognize the signifikant development compared to a saturn V, developed in the 60th. No way!😢
Great description…journalism at it’s best
The next tower should be built out of Titanium. It's lighter than stainless steal with a higher melting point, I believe.
Apollo 8 made it around the moon with a crew of 3. Where will "Starship" 8 get?
Better and better! Every forward progress is one more step in a secured future for mankind. Much love for Musk and the mighty Space X team!
Actually they did plan a pad landing. They were also going to catch the booster for the second time. They received some data that caused spacex to abort the pad landing and directed the rocket offshore. Not great info in this video. Sounds like an AI channel.
There was a tremendous amount of WIND blowing that day. Just go back and look on the crowd watching.
We were told that recovery might not be possible before liftoff doe to conditions and systems.
Musks head got too big, punk firing everybody
i heard Bad Luck Brian was out sailing, and starship landed directly on top of his boat.
How much do taxpayers give to support President Musk’s rocket toy?
Nice plane, but the mileage is no good as a commuter. How much is a fill up?
Did we retrieve?
Thanks for the good Analysis and Speculation ... I agree ! ... This TF6 was to gather Data for the future changeover to BF Blockhead 2 Rockets .... Plus , the FAA will stay happy and Musk can Launch again in December ! ... Cheers !
Why did we see blue unexploded gas spray out of the top right section out of the booster?
Nothing more than excess CH4 burning off. It was in the last launch as well.
There goes another few million..Next time invite Putin...( No makeup matters).😂😂😂😂
yeahhhhh......just think of how many illegals we could have rounded up and deported with that money...
Lofty expectations? Good grief! The achievement to soft land something this big on the correct spot isn’t lofty enough?
More human junk dumped in the sea!
Can you guys drop your empty rockets to no where in the US please! And stop dumping your s..t in the beautiful Indian ocean...
darned think melted the tower on top of the launch pad.
At least this one didn't explode, tumble out of control, or catch fire. A significant milestone that Musky said would be accomplished YEARS ago.
I'm glad the evolution of mankind isn't up to you. You sound like you'd be too pessimistic to have a go at anything. Thank God there are men like Musk willing to try.
I guess you didn't see the one that safely landed back into the rigging where it launched? The video is at X.
This one was about successful launch of this increased size and weight. It was guided to meet the water in the same vertical configuration as the landing rather than have it land into the rigging again. The data told them it achieved what he wanted to see for the bigger and heavier rocket.
He has been reusing rockets, launching and landing on the same launch pad, for quite some time. No one else has.
Wow, and you can't remember where you left your keys😂
Breaking: Musk is playing with his rockets that pollute the air and comes with a sonic boom everytime it comes back down to Earth. This is a nothing burger
......the world must seem like a terrifying place from your small and narrow mind.....
👍👍👍
Worthy.
So, WTF is NASA doing these days?
While they didn’t try to catch flight 6.
It was not a failure. And should not be see as such. These are early flights of starship. And are all learning and data gathering flights, and many of the flights to come will be the same.
So long as they gather good info from the flight, and that info helps them in future flights. They are all successful in my opinion.
SpaceX has proven everyone wrong over and over and over again. Because they learn and correct from every launch. And they make every one else look stupid. And there is nothing wrong with that.
If SpaceX is better, so be it. Everyone else needs to work harder, they need to work to be better than SpaceX. And if they work harder enough and smart enough they will surpass SpaceX. And I don’t think Elon would have a problem with that.
Because as Elon says. “Competition is good”.
Sorry but I see this as a partial failure. From here on out if SpaceX does not catch the booster, it's a failure. That is what the booster is designed to do.
They didn't show the booster landing and exploding. I don't know if that was exactly what it was supposed to do.
@@markcaserta1367 That's why it's called A TEST. It's been supposed to gather infomation, adjust.
DON'T FORGET, IT TOOK NASA 8-9 YEARS TO ACCOMPLISH WHAT SPACE-X HAS DONE IN 3, & BOEING -NASA IS NO'T WORKING YET.... *The comparison I said maybe off, but think about fact that it took NASA from about 1950 (when they got serious about Space) to 1961 from launching American V2s, Redstones, Atlas to get to Saturn I in 1961 & Saturn V in '67.*
Flight 6 was like the Mike Tyson and Jack Paul fight a big disappointment !!!!!!!!!!
Nice, healthy orange smoke
Is this good for the environment ? Mr. Electric Cars. LMFAO !!! And how about taking care of the people on Earth 🌎 🤔. Trying to put people on Mars ? What a waste of money. Uggggg 😮😢😢😢
An older starship and booster. Could you expect anything else.
Tax extreme wealth.
laugh at extreme stupid
Would you just get to the point?
AMAZING! I'M AWESTRUCK! 😲 Congratulations ELON!!!!!! 👏👏❤
Do Nasa engineers work for Space X?
Isn't there a Cat 3 cyclone in the Indian Ocean???
Afterwards George Jetson and his entire family pulled up along side of this Imaginary space craft and escorted it to Santa's Village at the North pool. Gifts were exchanged and this Imaginary craft returned and landed right in Elon's driveway. Happy Happy Happy.
Better than nasa lmfao
They need a more compact "ship" for easy handling and recovery. And that will allow a more aerodynamic horizontal take off and landing. I think. It must be easy to produce a small model first. Better be quick before the "amateurs" do it.....
should have remained silent.....now everyone knows you're a dummass
Why did they not want to recover them
?
Mary had a little lamb. Its rocked was white as snow. Then boys and girls it was all very very cute.
The catch is a pointless gimmick. Just land it on the skirt encircling the engines which could be similar to a hovercraft skirt.. or even land it on the engines which would be the same level as the skirt. SKIRT
I would still like to know why was starship was still on fire after it landed in the Indian Ocean? Kinda weird there. Anyone? Thanks!
Put it under full load.
To bad they don't have a second tower or landing pad
*Too bad
They had those in the previous launch iirc, and it was a success too. Seems like this time, instead of having the rocket called back to a "designated landing pad", they tried landing WITHOUT a designated pad as if to simulate how "landing on a spot where we don't have a pad or are unable to build a pad" would turn out. (I.e, the moon, or mars)
....just a wild hunch 😶
@kio51423 the antenna on the launch and landing pad broke is why they didn't land with the chop sticks
@@DaveBigDawg oh..I didn't know 👍
@@kio51423 it's in the video
Fantastic
What a lot of pollution, and we still use tiles as a heat shield, oh yes.
previous catch was fake. I could be wrong.
flight 6 was a failure... whether fanboys like it or not
SpaceX did well. Space Trends did a terrible job of reporting the flight. Poor editing of the narration (out of sequence) and visuals not related to this flight.😒😒
6:10 aw i seee, thats why they aborted the catch. I was surprised giving that super heavy landed perfectly in the ocean.
More government money contracts for Elon.
Is this a repetition of the biblical story of Babylonia? The shot was taken the and spear headed for the heavens but then fell back to earth. While 47th was watching the show, his predecessor was busy appointing new judges. Food for thought
You sods. I thought something had gone wrong because of your thumbnail. I thought how did I miss that during the Launch. I didn't you are teasing.
… but Kamala ran a flawless campaign.🤣😂
Go Space X!!!
TrumpNation!💪🏼🇺🇸
MRLIKE FLAD
Musk got rich conning gov.ts for grants and useless projects. Solar roads, solar cities, hyperloop, etc. All con jobs made out to be so promising. Tons of tax dollars spent on nowhere projects left to rust. Trump Nation is a con job. Pipe Dreams and broken promises.
Well, what about the fire after the Starship fell over?
Trial and error! They knew instantly when it wasn’t gong to land in the clamps and went to the barge. 🇺🇸
@@johnknowlton3998 No. He's asking about the Starship -- not the booster. The flame on Starship, as its laying over in the ocean, is nothing more than excess CH4 burning off.
Congratulations to all involved. What a perfect educate for us to see aerodynamics propulsion the calculations and engineering proud to be an American. Don’t you agree?
We saw more in the 60's. It's 2024, and Spacex been at it for years. Basically we have Apollo with a lot of small engines instead of a few large ones. And that's it. Apollo 8 orbited the Earth with a crew of 3. Spacex has not even made it past low orbit. How thrilling. How genius.