@Ben Ng true. Maybe some way to physically prevent the trawling. I wonder if it would be possible/practical to erect some sort of anti-trawling structures. They could be erected around reefs particularly vulnerable to trawling and would catch or cut any nets that would be try to break the reef. It wouldn't be a perfect or scale-able solution, but I wonder if it would be possible
The problem with stopping it, is that that would severely damage fishing economies, and the fishermen who work these nets would be put out of a job. Along with a host of other problems that may be even more detrimental to the ecosystem and other things. Before you go trying to get things banned, you must first see the whole picture. There is so much more to these types of problems than people think, and all sides must be addressed. A better way to fix the problem may be regulating and limiting where, when and how ships can trawl.
You failed to mention the problem with dams on rivers. They prevent sediments from reaching the ocean. The sediments would normally neutralize carbonic acid, keeping the Ph of the oceans more stable.
@@myguykaikai9215 they're not "eager", they're both on their way to stop building new ones, as you can see here: www.researchgate.net/figure/Large-dams-built-per-decade-histogram-and-the-cumulative-volume-of-large-dams-built_fig2_257318268 I put "almost" to mean that some countries still have unfinisheb business with their rivers, but the general consensus is that there are enough dams already
@@pugdad2555 the deadzone isn’t cause of the sediments, it’s because of the phosphorus and nitrogen minerals from the massive amounts of fertilizer used on the farms around the Mississippi, which then feeds algae, and when the algae die they sink to the bottom and bacteria eat them and use up oxygen in the process of eating, and that’s the process of environmental hypoxia
Fun Fact: In New Zealand's Fiordland area, runoff from the forests is stained with tannins from the leaves (the same substance which gives brewed tea its colour) and the lighter but stained fresh water sits above the sea water. So much light is blocked that black corals grow at depths as shallow as 15 to 50 metres.
I don’t know how anyone could dislike Rose, she is amazing and I love the chill delivery. And her subtlety rocking the 1st nation bead work! Love you Rose 🌹 keep up the videos 💜
The delivery is too wooden. They need to inject some personality into her scripts. I want to see her do well but so far she is so lifeless. I don't hear excitement, or levity, or even interest. She's just reading a teleprompter.
The worst part is people don’t care about our environment India just dumps thier trash into the ocean places with high poverty when it floods all the trash ends up in rivers then the ocean
You're wonderful for what you're doing; please let me tell you that your consumption isn't causing this. That's Big Oil/plastics propaganda. I listened to an NPR report on this the other day. in the late 80's and 90's, when oil companies realized most plastic isn't recyclable, they created ad campaigns that used an environmentally-friendly message to push the responsibility of ecological consciousness onto the consumer, when they knew all along that they are responsible for the vast majority of ecological damage and global warming. We are being lied to by the real culprits. Don't believe them.
@@forcelightningcable9639 thank you for your comment. I tend to be so negative, like I'll jump in screaming "it's not consumption, it's production"!!!! Karl MARX AHHHH and then no one likes me even if I'm right
"Here is an amazing organism that creates natural master structures over tens of thousands of years that humans have never even gotten to witness. And here is how we are absolutely making sure they never are."
@CoffeePee show me how you'd react in front of the camera, more over posting to youtube.... My speech would probly be just as jarring and un-natural as anyone else. Ppl who criticize without any constructive aspect don't help anyone's confidence either
@@123TeeMee they're just doing what they have to to live, for many their other option is starving. The problem is their bosses who tell them to do this/give them no choice with the required lbs
Small correction: The section on aragonite caught my ear as I did a project on it during my masters program in materials engineering. Aragonite isn't a dissolved form of calcium carbonate, it's a morphology of solid calcium carbonate that is precipitated out of solution via biopolymer scaffolding (at least in marine monovalves). I believe the dissolved material is just calcium ions and carbonite ions, it doesn't become aragonite until it solidifies. Also at 9:10 there is a typo where it's misspelled as "argonite" Hope this helps!
@@garywait3231 I'm pretty sure she is accurately pronouncing the mineral aragonite, while the script misspelled it as argonite once. Aragonite is a mineral that precipitates in a marine context, while argonite is a chemical used to suppress fire. Aragonite: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aragonite Argonite: www.orrprotection.com/suppression/argonite#:~:text=Argonite%20is%20an%20inert%20gas,no%20direct%20global%20warming%20potential.
This video made me realize that: 1) in a sense, bioluminescence could be a result of the creature expelling excess energy/food? 2) We as humans are terrible and need to clean the planet
Shallow corals are actually fairly recent in evolutionary terms most corals are deep corals because they are the reservoir population from which shallow reefs evolve from. In fact during the Mesozoic the main reef builders weren't corals at all but rather a group of organisms known as Rudist clams which like shallow corals appear to have relied on photosynthetic algal symbiotes based on their strongly diurnal growth patterns (which also allowed us to calculate the length of a day back in the cretaceous ~23 hours 30 min) There were coral reef builders back in the Paleozoic but they all died out in the great dying along with most other reef builders like crinoids and brachiopods. Really shallow reefs and ecosystems in general appear to be both very productive but also very fragile pretty much every major or minor mass extinction wipes out shallow water species only for deep water species to move in to fill the vacancies.
@@Dragrath1 Thanks for the good info. I hope deep water corals survive in the future. I had read about the 23 hr 30 min day 70 mya but did not know clams were the source of the data.
"Whereever you are in the world, there is probably a deep reef nearby!" Me, living in the landlocked Austria, with the alps between me and any kind of sea water: :(
As a student worker, I got to maintain a saltwater tank with coral. It was super fun to feed them tiny frozen thawed shrimp (from a turkey baster), they were just like an anemone catching them on their "fingers" and curling up to shove it in their mouths.
"Thus all people of the world, walk behind me towards a common location to have a small debate. It has been quite dull without my presence..." - Eminem *Forgot to attribute quote, my apologies. It has been fixed.
Um if someone’s telling me that there is a coral nearby, deep or tropical, I’d say they are tripping because unless there are lake corals I don’t think I’d find any, alive, in Arkansas.
I thought the same thing, being in Wyoming at the moment. I honestly thought she was going to say something about coral deep underground or something else crazy like that.
if u like subnautica, ypu shpuld check put "ev nautilus" they use a deepsea rov submarine to search for creatures. coolest stuff ive seen in a long time
@Bleh Honestly, the care around detailing Subnautica's biomes with a relative level of convincing detail makes it all the better. There are obvious things you can point to and say "that's not like earth", but that just makes it better to play. When you go deeper, and the sun lit corals take way for bleached sands, and then deep water caverns lit by the odd bioluminescent plant or animal, then bleached out corals and plants, then you go to the lost valley or the lava zones, it really is a good game
I hate us as a species. Any time I learn about a new animal or ecosystem, I also learn about all the ways we are doing everything to eradicate them asap.
Is Scishow going to sponsor any indigenous artists to make beadwork merch we can get? I mean, if Rose is sporting beadwork earrings and Hank sports the pins then we absolutely need some legit beadwork merch...
I worked in a lab and we were testing pulsing Coral It's a soft Coral. What we did is we would put a certain amount of sunscreen on to the back of our hands after washing our hands of course. We would wait a set amount of time and then stick our hands into the water like you would if you were putting on sunscreen and then going into the ocean. We had our hand at different lengths away from the coral both vertically and horizontally and after different periods of time we would take count of how many times the coral pulsed . What sections were affected by the coral first etcetera Chemical sunscreens do negatively affect the coral. They make it Heavily slow pulsing Which is what allows it to seed And slow its reproductive time Etc . Chemical sunscreens are safer than the physical sunscreens however. As the physical sunscreens actually have a little metal Flex that are small enough to kind of embed into the top layer of our skin but not small enough to actually work its way deep or even near to our blood system. And wraps it does because they have very thin skin and it does still take a. Of time but that's beside the point. The issue is many people see you the physical sunscreens are safer for us and less chemicals. However it is more dangerous to the Aquatic Life if you're going swimming . Also chemical sunscreens start working after a few minutes or as the physical sunscreen if you have only put it on one day and then jump into the water it can essentially be rubbed off and washed off. It takes days of repeated use for it to actually build up a little bit into the skin to offer solid protection no matter What you're physically doing. There were studies done with pigs using physical sunscreens with zinc and titanium . We would put the sunscreen on the pigs about 5 times a day For 30 days and then we would test the pigskin . After about seven days you could actually go two days and still have a decent amount of sun protection. However those was depression may want to take vitamin D supplement Or with winter depression but generally 15 minutes of sunlight on your hands and face is enough for your body. Anyway just keep that in mind when putting on sunscreen and going to the beach. Maybe we shouldn't be putting on sunscreen and going to natural lakes and such. Maybe we shouldn't spend so much time at natural lakes and oceans where we need to wear sunscreen. I know it's common for everybody but it is destroying our environment and nobody ever talks about this. Every time I bring it up everyone acts like I'm just some crazy naturalist that wants everybody to get skin cancer. No I want people to realize the effect they have and maybe we can limit the way we are poisoning our planet with Our own footsteps . There is no way you can live a life without affecting the world around you puts try to make it in a good conscious way not lose these reefs that have taken millions of years to form and evolve and that we admire so much
1. snazzy earrings! 2. is this how corals would recolonize after a mass extinction event, drifting in from the deep ocean and adapting? and how long have corals been on earth?
What I find most interesting is how every nature channel frames the conservation like we all just have to come together, the universal human experience to save earth. Never once have I heard anyone highlight Indigenous land defenders or communism as the actual solution to a crisis caused by markets and for-profit economic systems. We can't all come together. We can't rely on "science" like science is some abstract good that has no class position. We need a planned economy based on science!
I love that you brought up indigenous people!! There are studies that analyze the biodiversity in the patches of forest they tended to, and the productivity of those patches are much higher than the land around them. Current nature conservation stemmed from Americans seeing landscapes after pushing out the natives that once tended to it, and thought that since no one lived there it was better for it, but today we are realizing that the maintenance of the forests were beneficial to both the forest and the people. Examples range from native tribes from the American eastern seaboard to native tribes in California that controlled wildfires for the benefit of the forest.
There is another contributor to acidification. The plastics industry makes polymers from monomers using sulfuric acid to link the monomers together. When the acid is no more useful for business, this "spent" sulfuric acid is dumped in the ocean. Please consider a SciShow segment on the good, bad, and ugly side of plastic manufacturing.
As a chemist, I have researched that due to permafrost thaw (and methane hydrate thaw) eventually the atmosphere will be oxygen poor above sea level. After that? Not sure. Will large mammals be able to live even at sea level? Not sure. Will Nature (of some sort) rebuild the Earth? Yes. Will humans in the future allow nature to rebuild? I would like to mitigate and delay these effects where possible (as most of us do or we would not be watching Scishow).
You never know what presenter you're going to get: scruffy dudebro on a beer run, or glamorous lady headed to a movie premier. Ya watches yer scishow and ya takes yer chances.
its sad that the huge corporations responsible for all the pollution will not do anything until its wayyy too late because it all just comes down to money
Hi SciShow! Just letting you know that you have two forms for the same word "aragonite" and "argonite" at 9:13, and that's a bit confusing. Would love it if you could correct that!
Things to note: 1.A) while there is no sunlight in the deep, there are few (single digits here) studies that have looked at presence of algae/ eukaryotes in deep sea corals so their presence is unknown however photosynthesis is likely not possible at this depth. 1.B) We don’t know if deep sea corals rely on algae, what is said here is misleading. Many algae (symbiodinium) are mixotrophic dinoflagellates which can photosynthesize but also live heterotrophically (eating bacteria for energy) thus they could survive at this depth, they just wouldn’t be relying on sunlight for their energy 2.) along side what was mentioned, Bamboo/octo corals have more calcium carbonate in their skeleton has more magnesium than stonier coral regardless of depth. This makes their skeleton stronger and more resilient to acidic waters. 3.) octocorals have been noted to be opportunistic feeders relying on filtering for food or using algae although many have been documented having preferences. This preference has been shown to change seasonally too. 4.) depending on the pacific/Atlantic water below 200m is not the same. The Pacific is much colder than the Atlantic 5.) unsurprisingly, I have isolated multiple bacteria from deep sea coral mucus capable of hydrocarbon degradation. However, no one has been able to prove why this is yet… only few papers exist on this. 5.B) while researchers have suggested this, it has yet to be proven as few studies exist regarding cultures bacteria from deep sea corals. 6.) test of the information is spot on :) Keep science-ing everyone! Sincerely, a marine microbiologist researching deep-sea corals
Confused on one thing. How would ocean acidification impact the skeletons of deep corals? I thought the whole problem with ocean acidification, besides removing particles from the water, is that it reacts with the calcium carbonate skeletons of corals. Since deep corals have skeletons made of protein and chitin, would ocean acidification affect them in the same way?
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Finally, a debrief on deep reefs
I'm glad I read this today. Thanks for the good laugh.
Awesome
I see what you did there😏🤭
@@user-qj8ee2tj5x Ummmmmm no! Go away!!
I like it
Just because they don't bleach doesn't mean they can't dye...
I'll show myself out.
Ok bye
@@issacmartinez360 No you can stay.
Don’t you even START! LOL!
Don't leave me! Don't leave me!
😂
How is trawling still legal?? It should not only be banned but fined so astronomically that no fishermen would dare it.
Because money
@Ben Ng true. Maybe some way to physically prevent the trawling. I wonder if it would be possible/practical to erect some sort of anti-trawling structures. They could be erected around reefs particularly vulnerable to trawling and would catch or cut any nets that would be try to break the reef. It wouldn't be a perfect or scale-able solution, but I wonder if it would be possible
The problem with stopping it, is that that would severely damage fishing economies, and the fishermen who work these nets would be put out of a job. Along with a host of other problems that may be even more detrimental to the ecosystem and other things.
Before you go trying to get things banned, you must first see the whole picture. There is so much more to these types of problems than people think, and all sides must be addressed. A better way to fix the problem may be regulating and limiting where, when and how ships can trawl.
Just another way capitalism destroys everything.
People have learned how to live sustainably for thousands of years.
@@Infernoraptor I fear trawling vessels are so large and have so much momentum that any pole buried even several meters would just get ripped out
This made me want to play Subnautica.
hah, i was just thinking about that! i wonder when the sequel will be released.
@@mothtolias Subnautica: Below Zero is already available on Steam in Early Access. I almost picked it up during the winter sale.
@@user-qj8ee2tj5x what?
Ayye same now that you say it
@@elijahtommy777 probably a scam
You failed to mention the problem with dams on rivers. They prevent sediments from reaching the ocean. The sediments would normally neutralize carbonic acid, keeping the Ph of the oceans more stable.
in fact almost every country has stopped building dams 15 years ago
@@tafazzi-on-discord that’s not entirely true. China and India are two examples of countries eager to continue building dams.
@@myguykaikai9215 they're not "eager", they're both on their way to stop building new ones, as you can see here: www.researchgate.net/figure/Large-dams-built-per-decade-histogram-and-the-cumulative-volume-of-large-dams-built_fig2_257318268
I put "almost" to mean that some countries still have unfinisheb business with their rivers, but the general consensus is that there are enough dams already
Unless it is the mississippi, which has caused the dead zone to appear in the Hulf of Mexico with all that sediments.
@@pugdad2555 the deadzone isn’t cause of the sediments, it’s because of the phosphorus and nitrogen minerals from the massive amounts of fertilizer used on the farms around the Mississippi, which then feeds algae, and when the algae die they sink to the bottom and bacteria eat them and use up oxygen in the process of eating, and that’s the process of environmental hypoxia
Fun Fact: In New Zealand's Fiordland area, runoff from the forests is stained with tannins from the leaves (the same substance which gives brewed tea its colour) and the lighter but stained fresh water sits above the sea water. So much light is blocked that black corals grow at depths as shallow as 15 to 50 metres.
I don’t know how anyone could dislike Rose, she is amazing and I love the chill delivery. And her subtlety rocking the 1st nation bead work! Love you Rose 🌹 keep up the videos 💜
The delivery is too wooden. They need to inject some personality into her scripts. I want to see her do well but so far she is so lifeless. I don't hear excitement, or levity, or even interest. She's just reading a teleprompter.
I think she just needs time to find her way
I’ve tried to be more mindful of how my consumption affects the environment, so this is very eye opening & helpful! Thank you.
Exactly
The Earth WILL thank you for caring. Unfortunately it's a rare trait 😕
The worst part is people don’t care about our environment India just dumps thier trash into the ocean places with high poverty when it floods all the trash ends up in rivers then the ocean
You're wonderful for what you're doing; please let me tell you that your consumption isn't causing this. That's Big Oil/plastics propaganda. I listened to an NPR report on this the other day. in the late 80's and 90's, when oil companies realized most plastic isn't recyclable, they created ad campaigns that used an environmentally-friendly message to push the responsibility of ecological consciousness onto the consumer, when they knew all along that they are responsible for the vast majority of ecological damage and global warming.
We are being lied to by the real culprits. Don't believe them.
@@forcelightningcable9639 thank you for your comment. I tend to be so negative, like I'll jump in screaming "it's not consumption, it's production"!!!! Karl MARX AHHHH and then no one likes me even if I'm right
Cold AND very nearly without food - exactly like my fridge.
SciShow: *posts this vid*
Me, immediately, in Rick Grimes voice: CORAL!!!!
Corel
@@microska2656 korel
"Here is an amazing organism that creates natural master structures over tens of thousands of years that humans have never even gotten to witness. And here is how we are absolutely making sure they never are."
Some of us more than others, though, right?
Big oof
Finaly someone talking at a normal pace in scishow, I can finaly watch it again to get relaxed :)
She seems to be getting much more comfortable talking to the camera!
I think she even dolled up a bit for it. :)
I was thinking the exact same thing about both comfy, and dolled up !!! I CONCUR ☺️
She's growing on me... At first I was like WHO IS THAT??? but now I'm kinda stoked to see her hosting scishow
@CoffeePee show me how you'd react in front of the camera, more over posting to youtube.... My speech would probly be just as jarring and un-natural as anyone else. Ppl who criticize without any constructive aspect don't help anyone's confidence either
K coffee pee whatever you say :) love ya mmuuaahhh😘
I thought Bottom Trawling was illegal internationally. Man I got to do some research.
Even if it is they have to be caught... What are the odds of that happening?
@@Entangled_Badger We need trawler trawlers! Netter nets! We have bigger fish to fry!
We need society to make people feel as bad as possible for such a choice of job. People aren’t just after money, we’re social creatures too.
@@123TeeMee they're just doing what they have to to live, for many their other option is starving. The problem is their bosses who tell them to do this/give them no choice with the required lbs
Small correction:
The section on aragonite caught my ear as I did a project on it during my masters program in materials engineering. Aragonite isn't a dissolved form of calcium carbonate, it's a morphology of solid calcium carbonate that is precipitated out of solution via biopolymer scaffolding (at least in marine monovalves). I believe the dissolved material is just calcium ions and carbonite ions, it doesn't become aragonite until it solidifies.
Also at 9:10 there is a typo where it's misspelled as "argonite"
Hope this helps!
Finally a host who pronounces 'anemone' right 😍
Yes, but not "argonite" !
who pronounced it incorrectly?
@@garywait3231 I'm pretty sure she is accurately pronouncing the mineral aragonite, while the script misspelled it as argonite once. Aragonite is a mineral that precipitates in a marine context, while argonite is a chemical used to suppress fire.
Aragonite: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aragonite
Argonite:
www.orrprotection.com/suppression/argonite#:~:text=Argonite%20is%20an%20inert%20gas,no%20direct%20global%20warming%20potential.
@@jredmane In any case, they are presenting supposedly factual science : so should get it right !
@@jredmane Excellent!:-) 🖖
This was so very informative. I was not aware of many of the high points of this video. Thank you so much.
Please continue to employ this eloquent speaker. I was easily able to follow along, despite auditory difficulties I face. Thank you for the science!
Native American host! Good job sci show! I love seeing my people in these positions ❤
Ooo ooo ooo do one on the coral reef in the Amazon River delta!
I really enjoyed learning about coral, and our human impacts on their environments. Thank you queen, for another excellent video.
This video made me realize that: 1) in a sense, bioluminescence could be a result of the creature expelling excess energy/food?
2) We as humans are terrible and need to clean the planet
This woman has the most amazing earrings I have ever seen
Same
Came to say the same and that she’s wearing a lovely dress that looks like it was made for her alone
Love Rose's earrings!
They look indigenous made (I’m Navajo and the earrings caught my eyes too) I’m curious to know if the host themselves are Native American.
@@coffeeh03666 Based on both that and her name (Rose Bear Don’t Walk...seriously how kick ass is that?!!), I had assumed that she was
Well done Rose. Thank you for sharing this with us today.
I'm listening to this with my eyes closed bc seeing deep sea stuff scares me but I'm so dang curious about these coral!
One of the best things you can do for yourself is face your fears. Good luck.
It’s good to have a healthy fear of the ocean. 😅 there’s all sorts of wild stuff down there we don’t know about
The cadence of her speech reminds me of Cordelia, that amuses me greatly. Wonderful presentation.
I've never gotten used to a new scishow host voice so fast
I just want to say, I've loved every pair of earrings you've worn so far! These are exceptionally lovely!
I didn’t even know these existed
I didn't know you existed until now, OP, but now that I do, I'd glad.
Me neither
Shallow corals are actually fairly recent in evolutionary terms most corals are deep corals because they are the reservoir population from which shallow reefs evolve from.
In fact during the Mesozoic the main reef builders weren't corals at all but rather a group of organisms known as Rudist clams which like shallow corals appear to have relied on photosynthetic algal symbiotes based on their strongly diurnal growth patterns (which also allowed us to calculate the length of a day back in the cretaceous ~23 hours 30 min)
There were coral reef builders back in the Paleozoic but they all died out in the great dying along with most other reef builders like crinoids and brachiopods. Really shallow reefs and ecosystems in general appear to be both very productive but also very fragile pretty much every major or minor mass extinction wipes out shallow water species only for deep water species to move in to fill the vacancies.
@@Dragrath1 Thanks for the good info. I hope deep water corals survive in the future. I had read about the 23 hr 30 min day 70 mya but did not know clams were the source of the data.
"Whereever you are in the world, there is probably a deep reef nearby!"
Me, living in the landlocked Austria, with the alps between me and any kind of sea water: :(
Honestly? Those mountains probably have some coral remains in them ngl.
The Alps almost certainly have fossilized coral in them.
Great that you covered this topic !!!
I dare say I rather enjoy these longer videos
As a student worker, I got to maintain a saltwater tank with coral. It was super fun to feed them tiny frozen thawed shrimp (from a turkey baster), they were just like an anemone catching them on their "fingers" and curling up to shove it in their mouths.
im setting up a reef tank soon
@@OmniversalInsect I've got a small one going myself. I'm a couple of months in, it's a bit of work and kinda pricey, but totally worth it.
@@Schaelarren nice, my tank is quite close to finish cycling, I'll get fish and later on some coral
Coral: The Deep Cut.
Omg I need to ask you get out with this humor
Lol
Rising sea levels: _Now this looks like a job for me_
@@bosniakedisniksic i believe they are speaking for the coral reefs. 🖖
We just need a little controversy, you fools, this is the Trathaal who speaks for the reefs
"Thus all people of the world, walk behind me towards a common location to have a small debate. It has been quite dull without my presence..." - Eminem
*Forgot to attribute quote, my apologies. It has been fixed.
rose has the coolest videos in my opinion
Just wow, really interesting. I've never heard of deep sea corals, sad how we affect even them down there :/.
I like this girl. She's good
No way, her reading was awkward and distracting
@Bleh Ok, go on. You must know me and what is going on in my head. What prejudice is talking?
@@BinarySurfer lol how was it awkward? Her talking pace is about the same as Michael’s.
I’ve never heard of Deep Reefs until today. Very interesting! Love this channel been watching for quite a while now! 💫
I'm always fascinated by coral ecosystems.
Um if someone’s telling me that there is a coral nearby, deep or tropical, I’d say they are tripping because unless there are lake corals I don’t think I’d find any, alive, in Arkansas.
It's relative. Gulf of Mexico reefs are near Arkansas. (She's in Montana).
One word: aquarium
I live in nz so the opposite thing nothing but beaches everywhere
You are closer to the ocean in Arkansas than I am in Colorado.
I thought the same thing, being in Wyoming at the moment. I honestly thought she was going to say something about coral deep underground or something else crazy like that.
Those purple victorgorgia... love, love, love those!!
Do a special on microplastics and how much of it is from fishing equipment used by commercial fishing
Absolutely fascinating!
Is it bad that when I read "coral" I hear a llama saying "Carl"?
Lol
From Jimmy Neutron 😂 😂
I like this new lady host, she is easily as nerdy as the guys! This is a compliment btw!
Also "get in on the deep reef action" - yeah, baby!
Nerdy as the guys but easier on the eyes lol
@@darrenswails, she is cute. I like her voice too.
@@darrenswails Hank and Michael are gorgeous I don’t know what you’re talking about.
@@otaku3OBSESSION I mean if you're into that 😂
Mr Krabs: That’s so Corál!
Subnautica players: Hey! I've seen this one! It's a classic!
if u like subnautica, ypu shpuld check put "ev nautilus"
they use a deepsea rov submarine to search for creatures.
coolest stuff ive seen in a long time
@@bazookallamaproductions5280 you speak English?
@Bleh Honestly, the care around detailing Subnautica's biomes with a relative level of convincing detail makes it all the better. There are obvious things you can point to and say "that's not like earth", but that just makes it better to play. When you go deeper, and the sun lit corals take way for bleached sands, and then deep water caverns lit by the odd bioluminescent plant or animal, then bleached out corals and plants, then you go to the lost valley or the lava zones, it really is a good game
And the craziest part is that they are highly intelligent omnipotent aliens who want to understand humanity and take them to paradise.
I live bout an hour away from coast in south Carolina and never knew we had deep reef like that awesome!! Thanks
New host.
I approve.
She seems less confident but that comes with time and practice.
Sending much love
Deep ocean stuff is amazing
I hate us as a species. Any time I learn about a new animal or ecosystem, I also learn about all the ways we are doing everything to eradicate them asap.
Speaking of reefs, a video on the formation of non-coral reefs would be really interesting, such as the Capitan Reef formation
Some are even bioluminescent
I dye my pubic hair with bioluminescence
@@polarspirit: Sex as a laser light show. I like it.
Man, this video makes me want to go back and play Subnautica again for the umpteenth time.
Fresh water reefs next? Especially in green lakes NY. Non coral.
Brackish water reefs at the mouth of the Amazon
No such thing as freshwater reefs. All corals lives in the sea.
I was today years old when I found out some sharks lay eggs.
Shark eggs can be some really neat shapes! If you haven't already, google an image of them
Enjoying the new host, her pronunciation is very good!
Is Scishow going to sponsor any indigenous artists to make beadwork merch we can get? I mean, if Rose is sporting beadwork earrings and Hank sports the pins then we absolutely need some legit beadwork merch...
I like this idea!
Great video. Thanks for sharing.
rose is my favourite host
Good Job!
We couldve had it all .. corals in the deep.
- Adele
I worked in a lab and we were testing pulsing Coral It's a soft Coral. What we did is we would put a certain amount of sunscreen on to the back of our hands after washing our hands of course. We would wait a set amount of time and then stick our hands into the water like you would if you were putting on sunscreen and then going into the ocean. We had our hand at different lengths away from the coral both vertically and horizontally and after different periods of time we would take count of how many times the coral pulsed . What sections were affected by the coral first etcetera Chemical sunscreens do negatively affect the coral. They make it Heavily slow pulsing Which is what allows it to seed And slow its reproductive time Etc . Chemical sunscreens are safer than the physical sunscreens however. As the physical sunscreens actually have a little metal Flex that are small enough to kind of embed into the top layer of our skin but not small enough to actually work its way deep or even near to our blood system. And wraps it does because they have very thin skin and it does still take a. Of time but that's beside the point. The issue is many people see you the physical sunscreens are safer for us and less chemicals. However it is more dangerous to the Aquatic Life if you're going swimming . Also chemical sunscreens start working after a few minutes or as the physical sunscreen if you have only put it on one day and then jump into the water it can essentially be rubbed off and washed off. It takes days of repeated use for it to actually build up a little bit into the skin to offer solid protection no matter What you're physically doing. There were studies done with pigs using physical sunscreens with zinc and titanium . We would put the sunscreen on the pigs about 5 times a day For 30 days and then we would test the pigskin . After about seven days you could actually go two days and still have a decent amount of sun protection. However those was depression may want to take vitamin D supplement Or with winter depression but generally 15 minutes of sunlight on your hands and face is enough for your body. Anyway just keep that in mind when putting on sunscreen and going to the beach. Maybe we shouldn't be putting on sunscreen and going to natural lakes and such. Maybe we shouldn't spend so much time at natural lakes and oceans where we need to wear sunscreen. I know it's common for everybody but it is destroying our environment and nobody ever talks about this. Every time I bring it up everyone acts like I'm just some crazy naturalist that wants everybody to get skin cancer. No I want people to realize the effect they have and maybe we can limit the way we are poisoning our planet with Our own footsteps . There is no way you can live a life without affecting the world around you puts try to make it in a good conscious way not lose these reefs that have taken millions of years to form and evolve and that we admire so much
On the thumbnail, the creature at the top left corner of the title box is a gorgon a kind of hypertentacles starfish thing. Nor a coral
Again, the new host is so great🙌🏽 Very good job young lady👌🏽
1. snazzy earrings!
2. is this how corals would recolonize after a mass extinction event, drifting in from the deep ocean and adapting? and how long have corals been on earth?
What I find most interesting is how every nature channel frames the conservation like we all just have to come together, the universal human experience to save earth.
Never once have I heard anyone highlight Indigenous land defenders or communism as the actual solution to a crisis caused by markets and for-profit economic systems. We can't all come together. We can't rely on "science" like science is some abstract good that has no class position. We need a planned economy based on science!
I love that you brought up indigenous people!! There are studies that analyze the biodiversity in the patches of forest they tended to, and the productivity of those patches are much higher than the land around them. Current nature conservation stemmed from Americans seeing landscapes after pushing out the natives that once tended to it, and thought that since no one lived there it was better for it, but today we are realizing that the maintenance of the forests were beneficial to both the forest and the people. Examples range from native tribes from the American eastern seaboard to native tribes in California that controlled wildfires for the benefit of the forest.
Hauntingly beautiful
Nice to hear Antarctica pronounced properly, and a fascinating video to boot👌🏻
Thanks got the coral update!
There is another contributor to acidification. The plastics industry makes polymers from monomers using sulfuric acid to link the monomers together. When the acid is no more useful for business, this "spent" sulfuric acid is dumped in the ocean. Please consider a SciShow segment on the good, bad, and ugly side of plastic manufacturing.
Bring her back for more videos please.
That’s great I did assume coral in deep water was only sparse and around geothermal structures.
Fascinating! 🖖
At 9:12 is that a spelling error? Should it read "Aragonite" instead of "Argonite"?
Q: So plant hairs, what are they for? How similar to animal hairs are they, and do they keep a plant warm? And are thorns hairs or leaves?
If you’re talking about cactus plants with hairs in them i think those hairs are made of chitin
@@apdroidgeek1737 silicates
No matter how far you go from them, humans have been found to cause trouble even at vast distances...
As a chemist, I have researched that due to permafrost thaw (and methane hydrate thaw) eventually the atmosphere will be oxygen poor above sea level. After that? Not sure. Will large mammals be able to live even at sea level? Not sure. Will Nature (of some sort) rebuild the Earth? Yes. Will humans in the future allow nature to rebuild? I would like to mitigate and delay these effects where possible (as most of us do or we would not be watching Scishow).
I like this host, she should get more episodes.
1:00 that crab is the stuff of nightmares
You never know what presenter you're going to get: scruffy dudebro on a beer run, or glamorous lady headed to a movie premier. Ya watches yer scishow and ya takes yer chances.
Always interesting.
We thought it was a rock but it was a squat lobster
Rick Grimes:. "We have to find coral!"
Coral reefs are the jungles of the oceans.
The ocean is a amazing place.
its sad that the huge corporations responsible for all the pollution will not do anything until its wayyy too late because it all just comes down to money
What is a mile? How far is 85 miles in international units?
We named my daughter Coralanne for the Coral species and her Mothers.
Love your face! Best of luck.
Hi SciShow! Just letting you know that you have two forms for the same word "aragonite" and "argonite" at 9:13, and that's a bit confusing. Would love it if you could correct that!
"No matter where you are in the world"
Yeah, im in the upper midwest...
The entire midwest was once under a shallow sea. So there is definitely coral beneath you. Almost certainly dead and fossilized, but there nonetheless
@@angelitabecerra i thought start digging!:-) 🖖
I learned from the Magic School Bus...the connection between algae and coral + bleaching...in shallow water
Things to note: 1.A) while there is no sunlight in the deep, there are few (single digits here) studies that have looked at presence of algae/ eukaryotes in deep sea corals so their presence is unknown however photosynthesis is likely not possible at this depth.
1.B) We don’t know if deep sea corals rely on algae, what is said here is misleading. Many algae (symbiodinium) are mixotrophic dinoflagellates which can photosynthesize but also live heterotrophically (eating bacteria for energy) thus they could survive at this depth, they just wouldn’t be relying on sunlight for their energy
2.) along side what was mentioned, Bamboo/octo corals have more calcium carbonate in their skeleton has more magnesium than stonier coral regardless of depth. This makes their skeleton stronger and more resilient to acidic waters.
3.) octocorals have been noted to be opportunistic feeders relying on filtering for food or using algae although many have been documented having preferences. This preference has been shown to change seasonally too.
4.) depending on the pacific/Atlantic water below 200m is not the same. The Pacific is much colder than the Atlantic
5.) unsurprisingly, I have isolated multiple bacteria from deep sea coral mucus capable of hydrocarbon degradation. However, no one has been able to prove why this is yet… only few papers exist on this.
5.B) while researchers have suggested this, it has yet to be proven as few studies exist regarding cultures bacteria from deep sea corals.
6.) test of the information is spot on :)
Keep science-ing everyone! Sincerely, a marine microbiologist researching deep-sea corals
Also if note, when I say “deep sea” I mean well below the photic zone, so >500m.
me ignoring half the video seeing I don't live within 10 hours of a deep-sea coral reef...
i seriously hate most things we do.
Fun fact: deep sea coral reefs are usually called coral forests
Confused on one thing. How would ocean acidification impact the skeletons of deep corals? I thought the whole problem with ocean acidification, besides removing particles from the water, is that it reacts with the calcium carbonate skeletons of corals. Since deep corals have skeletons made of protein and chitin, would ocean acidification affect them in the same way?
Unless there are coral reefs in the great lakes, I live nowhere near any reefs, living a thousand miles inland as I do.
I think the new host is growing on me.