@@saraswatkin9226 I think the idea is that it isn't the only religion that is picked on, but rather the only one that is offended and reacts in this manner
Does this guy realize that "Muslim" and a "race" are two different words? Racism applies to a race, not a religion. Its a choice to convert to Islam, but Islam itself is not something "genetic"- aka not a race.
yeah but when people judge u on ur believes or on your religion this became recisim ( we shouldn't have this much hate , we can be really open minded and be more loving ! i always disliked people who shout be open minded but when u don't they judge u for not being ! but isn't judging a person on what he think and don't accept him is anti-open-minded ?)
ALMu7rami It is not. rac·ism ˈrāˌsizəm noun the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races. prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
I really feel for Douglas Murray. listening to the absolute stupidity is soul destroying, coupled with the absolute lack of guts shown by the press, this whole thing Is dangerously ridiculous, Religion is so petty and mentally challenged that I find it really difficult to even listen to this kind of debate and Islam is the most pathetic Religion of them all.
Its funny that Ashgar rants about Western colonialism when some of his articles praise the Ottoman & Mughal Empires as ideal historical examples of Islamic power & unity. He glosses over the fact that these two empires were even more imperialist, colonialist & repressive than the West.
"We should not conflate racism with religious criticism. I think that's a very dangerous development when we start to talk about criticizing religions as racism." Of course, the guy in the studio is well aware of what he's doing.
The man is saying that to publish Muhamad is so racist as to publish a “black person in a zoo like an animal”; but, for example sake, Idi Amin Dada was an Ugandan dictator and it happens he was black; he was a very, very bad person and could easily be draw in a cartoon as a dangerous animal in a zoo. In this video particular case, Muhamad is a muslin, he is not all muslins. Or would the Ugandans think the cartoonist meant all of them when draw the hypothetical cartoon? Certainly not. It is a critic to a particular person, and if it is particular, it is not aimed to all race, so it cannot be racist.
This debate was rubbish - gave too much platform to the rambling Muslim and very little to Douglas Murray. I recommend watching any religion debate involving Richard Dawkins, Laurence Krauss or Christopher Hitchens
shinobi38 Example? Any videos on RUclips to demonstrate this? I'm aware he is rightwing, but I wouldn't describe him as a fascist - subject to tangible evidence to the contrary.
Asghar Bukhari was quite possibly the worst person to use in a debate like this. There should have been a better representation for Islam/Muslims on the debate.
Some folks from the Quillam Foundation would be better. Ashgar seems to be some sort of pan-Islamist. He has this fantasy that the Muslim world was a united entity before the 19th and 20th centuries. Like some sort of earthly paradise for Muslims (but hell for the dhimmis/infidels/non-muslims who were there first). This guy only cements the worst fears of those who don't know much about the religion.
switchbladefights82 I disagree. I don't think the guys from Quilliam Foundation would be *representative* of the Islamic world view. If I'm not mistaken, they are an antiterrorism think-tank, so would be at odds with what many Muslims feel about this whole issue of cartoons depicting Muhammad. Being *more palatable does not qualify one as being a "better" participant to a debate* - rather I would argue that this clown Bukhari may be more representative of the views held by many. Also note that the founder of the Quilliam Foundation has been called an "apostate" and subject to death threats from his "fellow" Muslims.
Oh! It was the Foreign Policy! I thought they shouted "We have avenged the prophet Mohamed!" and "Allahu akbar!" *I guess they talked about foreign policy after they got back in their car...*
who is this man? how can he say that Charlie Hebdo's drawers are racists? I"m french and i can tell that this guy doesn't know at all what he is talking about!!! Je suis Charlie, and Charlie is everything but racist!!!
Mr Bukhari,said that Muslims are not treated with respect. If people like him are representing Muslim's,they will never get respect. Respect is not a right,it has to be earned.
mr.bukhari's "1930s america" argument is flawed - blacks were brought to ameirca against their will, as slaves, while muslims emigrated to europe from muslim majority countries voluntarily. plus, in 1930s, many parts of america practiced segregation against blacks, enforced legally, unlike europe where muslims are equal under law. p.s. i was born muslim, but chose reason as my guide instead of that ludicrous book, quran.
The only difference between the man featured here and the shooters is lack of courage. If he wasn't a coward he would be the one committing these acts because they cohere with his beliefs as demonstrated by his reaction here. So he is actually worse than them morally. Their viewpoints are the same but he would rather sit in the safety of a society who he despises rather than actually act out the barbaric ideology he really believes in.
This Muslim in the studio has made a blunder -- saying these picture strips is "Racist" and then comparing it to one of most cruel period in recent history - that of the segregation of the black people because of their skin colour is a ludicrous comparison. First of all Islam is not a race, it is a religion. Do not mix those categories up. Second, it is the right of all humans to have both freedom of religion and speech, and to express their view on all matters (including Islam) in what ever manner they choose. What is more interesting is this new idea of offence. Even according to the hadith of Islam the Prophet gave the believer the right to do just the same as what Charlie Hebdo has done. It completely hypocritical of this man in what he is saying.
"Prominent and outspoken Muslim activist Asghar Bukhari has left the UK for the UAE, disillusioned by a Muslim community which he says isn’t willing to do what it takes to defend itself."
It makes a soo ridiculous image of a country that allows to be spat on the face by people who are foreigners. And then , because it is a soo civilized country , they procede to have a public discussion so the one that likes spitting can say why he has the right to do so.
That was painful to watch, the guest in the studio could hardly speak let alone the seeming lack of substance in his argument. Violence is never justified.
"The people power can ridicule themselves"So can I ridicule the "Prophet"in Saudi Arabia,Iran,Indonesia,UAE,Jordan,Egypt,Pakistan and other Muslim majority countries.
Carlos Latuff, a world renowned Brazilian cartoonist, told Daily Sabah, “It is an everlasting discussion, because what is freedom of speech and what is hate speech? Why are some subjects protected by freedom of speech and others not? Why can we mock some issues and cannot do so with others? Should Holocaust denial, for example, be included as freedom of speech, or racial hatred? See, for example, the treatment given by the Western mainstream media to Muhammad cartoons and the Holocaust cartoons.”
Spot the Hysterical Lunatic! Ashkar depicts everything contemptible about Islamic Fanaticism. Douglas, as always, was calm, firm and erudite. What a difference! I know who I'd rather live next to ....
Islam is not a race and therefore, the comparison between Muslims and Black people is invalid. And that fact alone undermines the Muslim guy's argument. Islam is a religion that people choose to adopt to varying degrees. All Muslims do not accept the tenets of Islam to the same degree.
mikeenwright333 under uk law, in accordance with the mc pherson report recommendations, nationality, ethnicity, race and religion are to be regarded as interchangeable terms, and offenses against a person or group motivated by any of these criteria is to be regarded as racist, so in law there is no distinction between a racial group and a religious group.
& as I watch this on the 27th of July 2016 I just saw on the morning News that another attack in France has just happened leaving a catholic priest dead,
and as I watch this in 2021, a year ago in 2020 a teacher was beheaded for showing those cartoons in a school, and ANOTHER wave of attacks in France made it into a Summer of Blood. and as of 2021, a teacher in the UK hides for fear of is life, after showing the same cartoons.
Muslims are NOT: Equal in suffering to Jews Equal in suffering to African Americans Not a separate Race How is it racist? Also why should we bow down to one religion over another? Would Muslims give the same respect to say Hindus? Or Zoroastrians? Or Buddhists? This goes beyond respecting Islam. This spectacle of a show gave more time, and compassion to the Muslim feelings rather than the souls massacred over cartoons......cartoons...car.. Nevermind the left cares are a moot point because they have none.
-Look Asghar, Charlie Hebdo's people were killed because they drew and publishd caricatures of the Prophet. -Yeat, it's so sad to see such racist people dead.
It’s now 2018. There are countless television debates on this subject....I’ve NEVER seen these cartoons! It’s a HUGE subject for debate BUT we can’t see what is being debated! Jeremy Corbyn has been called antisemitic for defending the “Jewish banker mural”. The general consensus appears to be that the mural IS VERY antisemitic yet EVERY video shows the image being discussed. The Charlie Hebdo cartoons are divisive. There is NO consensus that the cartoons were “racist” yet they are NOT shown....
My question to Mr. Bukhari would be the following: If ridicule and criticism of the islamic faith are only despised by people like yourself for the sake of preventing oppression against a minority (in this case islam), then how come that we don't see caricatures of Mohammed being published in muslim majority countries?
I have been asking every muslim i ever came across in the past 5yrs jus one question which they haven't been able to answer. Question: If God created human by himself without your help, WHY does he need your help to kill the same human he created by himself by himself!????
Could always tell his guy in-studio was lying when he hit that low-intellect truth buffer & began stuttering through a word-grab to promote the notion of it being reasonable to always be walking on eggshells around 1 particular religious group, when none others are claiming the same right.
racist ... a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. race .... each of the major divisions of humankind, having distinct physical characteristics. religious ... belonging or relating to a monastic order or other group of people who are united by their practice of religion. Racism (physical) is not about religion (beliefs). @08:45
If it would have been only a power structure issue, then it would have been okay to draw satirical pictures and cartoons in Islamic countries where muslims have the power and islam IS the power structure, right......!!!??? BUT NO!
people who easily get offended by free speech should watch more rap battles. I recommend KOTD, URL, Dont Flop. I recommend battle rappers like Arsonal, Dizaster, Rone.
Going back and watching this illogical apologist stutter in front of Douglas makes me grab my coffee and wait for the response...although I've watched it 20 times! lol Douglas LOVES confrontation but hes educated and relentless when he's either attacked or someone turns up to a fight unprepared.... Love the guy!
How is drawing a Muslim as a Muslim racist? Even if it is freedom of expression means complete freedom of expression the only restriction is not hurting others to prove your point.
Mohammad being ridiculed is not the same as all Muslims ridiculed. This only shows that the likes of those who attack and maim in the name of religion have won.
I bet they wish they had guns. That’s why we need our guns in the USA. Protection from government & incompatible people immigrating that can’t assimilate.
Living in a world of slander is common tongue in America. Absolutely absurd no one continued its publications, I guess there’s where they conceded to the Jewish star.
“What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.” Salman Rushdie
Unfortunately still appropriate to remind those today
muslims : offended by everything - ashamed of nothing
Very very very well said👍👍👍
ash amed sounds like a middle eastern name
Why just pick on muslims?
@@saraswatkin9226 I think the idea is that it isn't the only religion that is picked on, but rather the only one that is offended and reacts in this manner
@@saraswatkin9226 and again, the victim card
I am so glad that Mr Bukhari was on the show, he epitomises the mentality of what the west must now deal with.
What a pathetic figure this guy Bukhari is. Root of this type of behaviour comes from only one source which all these guys follow.
Does this guy realize that "Muslim" and a "race" are two different words? Racism applies to a race, not a religion. Its a choice to convert to Islam, but Islam itself is not something "genetic"- aka not a race.
yeah but when people judge u on ur believes or on your religion this became recisim ( we shouldn't have this much hate , we can be really open minded and be more loving ! i always disliked people who shout be open minded but when u don't they judge u for not being ! but isn't judging a person on what he think and don't accept him is anti-open-minded ?)
ALMu7rami It is not.
rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm
noun
the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
i think he might be talking about arabs, as he is dressed like a an arab etc
Atal Habibi so Arabs are the only Muslims...?? Half of Muslim world is black Mr. Atal Habibi.
Well said. If a person can convert to Islam, then it's not a race.
Playing the 'Victim' card again. Lazy and childish by Mr Bukhari
That muslim never said anything negative about the murder, basicly, he justified it. And that is against freedom, in TV!!!
Douglas Murray is a hero
Douglas Murray- LEGEND
When I first became an admirer of Douglas Murray. Still his greatest ever interview for which he ought to be remembered
For me I became an admirer of him when I first saw his interview on the Strange Death of Europe. This man is truly incredible
Bravo to Douglas, he carries the torch on for the late great Christopher hitchens.
I love how they cut to Douglas Murray for like 10 seconds while he's just shaking his head
I really feel for Douglas Murray. listening to the absolute stupidity is soul destroying, coupled with the absolute lack of guts shown by the press, this whole thing Is dangerously ridiculous, Religion is so petty and mentally challenged that I find it really difficult to even listen to this kind of debate and Islam is the most pathetic Religion of them all.
Its funny that Ashgar rants about Western colonialism when some of his articles praise the Ottoman & Mughal Empires as ideal historical examples of Islamic power & unity. He glosses over the fact that these two empires were even more imperialist, colonialist & repressive than the West.
Typical. It's only bad when the whites do it lol
Ashgar "Douglas is a coward and afraid to publicly debate me"
Douglas "uhmm, we're having a public debate right now"
Ooof
It's the muslim shuffle.
Ad hominem!
"We should not conflate racism with religious criticism. I think that's a very dangerous development when we start to talk about criticizing religions as racism."
Of course, the guy in the studio is well aware of what he's doing.
The man is saying that to publish Muhamad is so racist as to publish a “black person in a zoo like an animal”; but, for example sake, Idi Amin Dada was an Ugandan dictator and it happens he was black; he was a very, very bad person and could easily be draw in a cartoon as a dangerous animal in a zoo. In this video particular case, Muhamad is a muslin, he is not all muslins. Or would the Ugandans think the cartoonist meant all of them when draw the hypothetical cartoon? Certainly not. It is a critic to a particular person, and if it is particular, it is not aimed to all race, so it cannot be racist.
really interesting point
Funny that Idi Amin was also a muslim.
This debate was rubbish - gave too much platform to the rambling Muslim and very little to Douglas Murray. I recommend watching any religion debate involving Richard Dawkins, Laurence Krauss or Christopher Hitchens
my thoughts exactly, although that douglass murray does a good job trying to cope with a screaming match.
Mohamed ThePedophile good video (if a bit long).
R fab yeah. He normally livens up these otherwise sleepy debates.
shinobi38 fascist? Why?
shinobi38 Example? Any videos on RUclips to demonstrate this? I'm aware he is rightwing, but I wouldn't describe him as a fascist - subject to tangible evidence to the contrary.
I'm glad she fought to let him speak uninterrupted.
More people need to defend others' right to speak & be heard.
Good on her.
Asghar Bukhari was quite possibly the worst person to use in a debate like this. There should have been a better representation for Islam/Muslims on the debate.
like who? abu hamza?
Why was he not a good representation of Muslims? Do they disagree with what he said?
Some folks from the Quillam Foundation would be better.
Ashgar seems to be some sort of pan-Islamist. He has this fantasy that the Muslim world was a united entity before the 19th and 20th centuries. Like some sort of earthly paradise for Muslims (but hell for the dhimmis/infidels/non-muslims who were there first). This guy only cements the worst fears of those who don't know much about the religion.
switchbladefights82 I disagree. I don't think the guys from Quilliam Foundation would be *representative* of the Islamic world view. If I'm not mistaken, they are an antiterrorism think-tank, so would be at odds with what many Muslims feel about this whole issue of cartoons depicting Muhammad. Being *more palatable does not qualify one as being a "better" participant to a debate* - rather I would argue that this clown Bukhari may be more representative of the views held by many. Also note that the founder of the Quilliam Foundation has been called an "apostate" and subject to death threats from his "fellow" Muslims.
I think Sky may have known this...
Thankyou for showing that the only person there who wanted to offend and interrupt was defending Islam
Absolutely love Douglas Murray
The terrorist attack at Charlie Hebdo made me realise western governments are frightened of Islam. JE SUIS CHARLIE
Douglas is SPOT ON! He deserves a much larger platform!
Let me please finish my point. That was brutal by Douglas
Oh! It was the Foreign Policy!
I thought they shouted "We have avenged the prophet Mohamed!" and "Allahu akbar!"
*I guess they talked about foreign policy after they got back in their car...*
It cannot be allowed to continue spot on Mr Murray.
who is this man? how can he say that Charlie Hebdo's drawers are racists? I"m french and i can tell that this guy doesn't know at all what he is talking about!!! Je suis Charlie, and Charlie is everything but racist!!!
Poor Murray, I believe he was suffering from a headache after listening to that apologist.
+WenLi Yang I think he should get drunk and sleep.i think if this douglas start satirising jews for 6 months and we see what happen.
@@drzakir123 he probably won't be butchered
Mr Bukhari,said that Muslims are not treated with respect. If people like him are representing Muslim's,they will never get respect. Respect is not a right,it has to be earned.
Imagine the IQ of someone saying: Muslim is a race. Just stop for a second and think to this.
Respect is earned and our Muslim friends have work to do.
He smeared 12 people who died 24 hours before
Of course, he does.
He supports the people who did it and hopes they get what they want.
Mental they are more bothered about people being offended than the 12 people that were brutally murdered.
mr.bukhari's "1930s america" argument is flawed - blacks were brought to ameirca against their will, as slaves, while muslims emigrated to europe from muslim majority countries voluntarily. plus, in 1930s, many parts of america practiced segregation against blacks, enforced legally, unlike europe where muslims are equal under law.
p.s. i was born muslim, but chose reason as my guide instead of that ludicrous book, quran.
this Muslim is trying to use "the jews" as human shield.
Who’s the Muslim with the neurological disorder?
The only difference between the man featured here and the shooters is lack of courage. If he wasn't a coward he would be the one committing these acts because they cohere with his beliefs as demonstrated by his reaction here. So he is actually worse than them morally. Their viewpoints are the same but he would rather sit in the safety of a society who he despises rather than actually act out the barbaric ideology he really believes in.
This Muslim in the studio has made a blunder -- saying these picture strips is "Racist" and then comparing it to one of most cruel period in recent history - that of the segregation of the black people because of their skin colour is a ludicrous comparison. First of all Islam is not a race, it is a religion. Do not mix those categories up. Second, it is the right of all humans to have both freedom of religion and speech, and to express their view on all matters (including Islam) in what ever manner they choose. What is more interesting is this new idea of offence. Even according to the hadith of Islam the Prophet gave the believer the right to do just the same as what Charlie Hebdo has done. It completely hypocritical of this man in what he is saying.
"Prominent and outspoken Muslim activist Asghar Bukhari has left the UK for the UAE, disillusioned by a Muslim community which he says isn’t willing to do what it takes to defend itself."
Hooray!
Good
It makes a soo ridiculous image of a country that allows to be spat on the face by people who are foreigners.
And then , because it is a soo civilized country , they procede to have a public discussion so the one that likes spitting can say why he has the right to do so.
Racist? Racism? Islam is a religion not a race.
I find it interesting that Douglas Murray calls Marine Le Pen 'far right' because I don't believe he would characterise her as such now
He definitely would not. Times are changing.
That was painful to watch, the guest in the studio could hardly speak let alone the seeming lack of substance in his argument. Violence is never justified.
Douglas M is ever so charming and clever. He has also established himself to be a master of rhetoric, and no less an artist of persuasion.
Douglas for PM
"The people power can ridicule themselves"So can I ridicule the "Prophet"in Saudi Arabia,Iran,Indonesia,UAE,Jordan,Egypt,Pakistan and other Muslim majority countries.
Carlos Latuff, a world renowned Brazilian cartoonist, told Daily Sabah, “It is an everlasting discussion, because what is freedom of speech and what is hate speech? Why are some subjects protected by freedom of speech and others not? Why can we mock some issues and cannot do so with others? Should Holocaust denial, for example, be included as freedom of speech, or racial hatred? See, for example, the treatment given by the Western mainstream media to Muhammad cartoons and the Holocaust cartoons.”
Spot the Hysterical Lunatic! Ashkar depicts everything contemptible about Islamic Fanaticism. Douglas, as always, was calm, firm and erudite. What a difference! I know who I'd rather live next to ....
Douglas 💪🏼
Islam is not a race and therefore, the comparison between Muslims and Black people is invalid. And that fact alone undermines the Muslim guy's argument.
Islam is a religion that people choose to adopt to varying degrees. All Muslims do not accept the tenets of Islam to the same degree.
if i'm biased against jew's i'll probably be called antisemitic, right?
and if i'm biased against muslims it'll be "freedom of speech".
mikeenwright333 under uk law, in accordance with the mc pherson report recommendations, nationality, ethnicity, race and religion are to be regarded as interchangeable terms, and offenses against a person or group motivated by any of these criteria is to be regarded as racist, so in law there is no distinction between a racial group and a religious group.
& as I watch this on the 27th of July 2016 I just saw on the morning News that another attack in France has just happened leaving a catholic priest dead,
But at least they didn't draw a picture of Mohammed.
and as I watch this in 2021, a year ago in 2020 a teacher was beheaded for showing those cartoons in a school, and ANOTHER wave of attacks in France made it into a Summer of Blood. and as of 2021, a teacher in the UK hides for fear of is life, after showing the same cartoons.
Muslims are NOT:
Equal in suffering to Jews
Equal in suffering to African Americans
Not a separate Race
How is it racist? Also why should we bow down to one religion over another? Would Muslims give the same respect to say Hindus? Or Zoroastrians? Or Buddhists?
This goes beyond respecting Islam. This spectacle of a show gave more time, and compassion to the Muslim feelings rather than the souls massacred over cartoons......cartoons...car.. Nevermind the left cares are a moot point because they have none.
-Look Asghar, Charlie Hebdo's people were killed because they drew and publishd caricatures of the Prophet.
-Yeat, it's so sad to see such racist people dead.
It’s now 2018. There are countless television debates on this subject....I’ve NEVER seen these cartoons! It’s a HUGE subject for debate BUT we can’t see what is being debated! Jeremy Corbyn has been called antisemitic for defending the “Jewish banker mural”. The general consensus appears to be that the mural IS VERY antisemitic yet EVERY video shows the image being discussed. The Charlie Hebdo cartoons are divisive. There is NO consensus that the cartoons were “racist” yet they are NOT shown....
Why should people who are liberal and tolerant, tolerate those who are clearly not liberal and are intolerant
9:41-that was terrifying hahaha. Go on son!
DOUGLAS MURRAY FOCUSED LIKE A LASER.
everybody knows the truth behind news channels not publishing the cartoon , the fear the same fate as sulman rushdie
The woman hit the nail on the head!
Douglas Murray is superb !
If Islam (or any other religion) was as strong as said, how come it stumbles over these little cartoons?
Ashgar is looking for his shoe.....can anyone help him find it?
The title of this seems to imply that freedom of speech and freedom of religion are somehow mutually exclusive, when if anything the opposite is true.
Douglas Murray is a hero.
Don't forget 20. May is "Everybody draw Mohammed Day".
Draw Moe and upload your pics on RUclips, Twitter, Facebook ...
Wish they’d have let Douglas speak more
Thank god for Douglas Murray 🙏
My question to Mr. Bukhari would be the following:
If ridicule and criticism of the islamic faith are only despised by people like yourself for the sake of preventing oppression against a minority (in this case islam), then how come that we don't see caricatures of Mohammed being published in muslim majority countries?
Freedom from religion and doctrine. Free free us from this madness
When ever Bukhari is speaking at least one of the 3 giant peopel behind him are shaking their heads.
Douglas Murray Legend
I can only think of ONE religious ideology that is opposed to free speech and independent thought.
lol its the mossad stole my shoe guy lol why the hell does anyone have him on tv ?
especially on a delicate issue such as charlie hebdo ?
Because he’s available and he’s in the business of being an ‘advocate’ for the Islamist cause.
Douglas Murray is on the mark. Other's talk babble.
Know islam, no peace
No islam, know peace
Unfortunately genius has its limits.
And unfortunately stupidity has no limits.
As this Muslims shows
I have been asking every muslim i ever came across in the past 5yrs jus one question which they haven't been able to answer.
Question: If God created human by himself without your help, WHY does he need your help to kill the same human he created by himself by himself!????
We made an editorial decision not to get killed.
8:42- 9:03 The most balanced view expressed all throughout this circus of a "debate"
It's not balanced. Bukhari is filth
Balanced argument starts at 9:15
Douglas well said sir. Well said
No freedom of speech is also freedom of religion. Freedom is not only for Muslim enslavers. Thats the whole point.
Could always tell his guy in-studio was lying when he hit that low-intellect truth buffer & began stuttering through a word-grab to promote the notion of it being reasonable to always be walking on eggshells around 1 particular religious group, when none others are claiming the same right.
When did ridiculing a person's faith become a part of a discussion of rights?
That muslim guy is angry
If we can make comics of Jews or Christians then Islam should not be exempt.
Your god myth always comes second to freedom of speech.
Islam is a regime; not a race
racist ... a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.
race .... each of the major divisions of humankind, having distinct physical characteristics.
religious ... belonging or relating to a monastic order or other group of people who are united by their practice of religion.
Racism (physical) is not about religion (beliefs). @08:45
If it would have been only a power structure issue, then it would have been okay to draw satirical pictures and cartoons in Islamic countries where muslims have the power and islam IS the power structure, right......!!!??? BUT NO!
Cannot be allowed to continue no
BTW, where was the War on Terror when the Barbary Coast States started attacking American ships and enslaving the crews?
people who easily get offended by free speech should watch more rap battles. I recommend KOTD, URL, Dont Flop. I recommend battle rappers like Arsonal, Dizaster, Rone.
Charlie Hebdo a racist newspaper? Baffling! I'm lost for words.
Going back and watching this illogical apologist stutter in front of Douglas makes me grab my coffee and wait for the response...although I've watched it 20 times! lol Douglas LOVES confrontation but hes educated and relentless when he's either attacked or someone turns up to a fight unprepared.... Love the guy!
How is drawing a Muslim as a Muslim racist? Even if it is freedom of expression means complete freedom of expression the only restriction is not hurting others to prove your point.
Mohammad being ridiculed is not the same as all Muslims ridiculed.
This only shows that the likes of those who attack and maim in the name of religion have won.
I bet they wish they had guns. That’s why we need our guns in the USA. Protection from government & incompatible people immigrating that can’t assimilate.
Hey Asghar! SAY IT, DON'T SPRAY IT!
Douglas is an inspiration
Living in a world of slander is common tongue in America. Absolutely absurd no one continued its publications, I guess there’s where they conceded to the Jewish star.
Go on Get em told Douglas 💪