Subbed a while back because of your winning personality. I haven't watched the channel much because im not a big Warcraft 3 guy. Very happy to see you playing Stormgate! Excited for the game. Thanks for uploading dude!
They're planning on having the same kind of co-op mode in Stormgate right from the start so hopefully that helps get new/inexperienced players on board.
@@lolstrup it's well documented fact or it's just your opinion? Because I can that tell that many pro players/RUclipsrs have smurfs and I they are pretty high elo
Every time I hear luminite I'm reminded of Illumynite, a mineral from Zork that was used to repel grues. Fun fact: Return to Zork was the game that saved activision from bankruptcy back in the day.
I kinda wish the game had heroes but I like that it still has creep camps to give you little macro objectives to take around the map. Creeping has always make games more dynamic in WC3 than SC2 in my opinion and maybe even without heroes it can deliver the same thing here. Also like the little optimizations with the infernal faction, like the free units from creeping with gaunts or detonating your brutes when they're about to die so you get mana from sacrificing them and deny the mana your opponent would get from killing them. Game definitely needs a lot of refinement and hopefully some more interesting units and upgrades when they add T3 tech and the new race but if the open beta is like 6 months before early access that probably means at least a year away from full release, so they've got plenty of time to work on it. It's a shame to see so much negativity surrounding the beta when it's still clearly unfinished.
It's almost frustrating to me how derivative this game is while being so rough. If you're going to save so many dev resources by just copying, why not put those in to design instead?
🤣… Grubby saying he doesn’t like to talk in games! LOL!! Bro your main strat during War3 days was to talk so damn much during a game you couldn’t keep up with the typing then you show up with a lvl 5 TC holding 3 strength belts. Sure bro… you don’t like chatting during a game… just like this one 😆 Sound about right or?
Is it only me that feel all models; down to the trees or stones, either lack depth, width or height, or sometimes 2 out of 3 all at once? I just can't put my finger on it.. WC3 Reforged had a little bit of that problem too when you zoomed out on units, but here it's far more prominent and covers even terrain, elevation levels and ground..
Defenders disadvantage are good because they favor better players. If you are better you should be able to attack faster than your opp. It's gonna get scary when every ivi game will turn into base trade 😂
Defenders disadvantage should be impossible unless you specifically create it for some reason. Now certain mechanics punishing pure turtling is another thing all together
@@zachariastsampasidis8880 its not 5v5 game. In 1v1 mirror matchup being better/faster than your opponent, should be rewarded. In the other way you should be punished for playing worse/slower than your opp.
@@d3adagain385 If you wanna reward really fast play and give a disadvantage for defenders... your just pushung all ins. You could not even go for macro and probably there would be a 1 base all in which get played every round... soo i think thats a horrible idea. Being faster dont mean your better. Everyone can go for a 3 Rax All in in SC2 and thats one of the fastest, but... is it the build you need the most skill? Nope.
Real talk; would this game even sell in 2004? I feel like even SC1 has this beat. There's something off-putting about it that can't be described. Like mixing strawberry and chocolate milkshake in one cup. It's like every thing you see in the map looks out of place.
I fail to see how Stormgate is better than warcraft 3 or starcraft 2. It might be new, but graphics seem old and gameplay looks less polished / balanced. There also isn't any "omg" moments, timing attacks feels off, or it lacks the hero impact warcraft 3 has ... It's honestly "meh".
I'm not all in love with the visual style. and for some reason, I can't enjoy too much "sweaty" SC2 type gameplay (unless it has the visual impact and fidelity of what SC2 was/broodwar)
I like the infernal faction but vanguard feels really bland and doesn't stand out at all from any generic scifi rts faction either from a visual or gameplay standpoint. If the 3rd (and hopefully potential 4th) race is really good maybe it'll save the game, it's a lot more forgivable to have a bland faction if there are 3 or 4 races instead of just 2. Like I find space marines very bland in 40k but there are so many other factions it doesn't matter.
Thats just your subjective opinion. I for example think that aoe4 sucks balls dude. SC2 i like way more and Stormgate looks funny and plays good so far
yeah i agree warcraft 3 is a fake game the only real games is SC2 Arcade Mode Probes vs Zealots, and Heroes of Might and Magic V, grubby is just noob playing fake games
Subbed a while back because of your winning personality. I haven't watched the channel much because im not a big Warcraft 3 guy. Very happy to see you playing Stormgate! Excited for the game.
Thanks for uploading dude!
Vision camp a mile away gets hit once “YOUR FORCES ARE UNDER ATTACK”
I’m hoping one day with enough practice I can hopefully put up a fight in these games. Played sc2 a lot but mostly coop and didn’t push my myself.
They're planning on having the same kind of co-op mode in Stormgate right from the start so hopefully that helps get new/inexperienced players on board.
Make 2 accs and always play lower elo one
@@d3adagain385 smurfing is for losers
@@lolstrup it's well documented fact or it's just your opinion? Because I can that tell that many pro players/RUclipsrs have smurfs and I they are pretty high elo
@@d3adagain385fact, sry
I have been having loads of fun learning stormgate!
Every time I hear luminite I'm reminded of Illumynite, a mineral from Zork that was used to repel grues.
Fun fact: Return to Zork was the game that saved activision from bankruptcy back in the day.
I kinda wish the game had heroes but I like that it still has creep camps to give you little macro objectives to take around the map. Creeping has always make games more dynamic in WC3 than SC2 in my opinion and maybe even without heroes it can deliver the same thing here. Also like the little optimizations with the infernal faction, like the free units from creeping with gaunts or detonating your brutes when they're about to die so you get mana from sacrificing them and deny the mana your opponent would get from killing them.
Game definitely needs a lot of refinement and hopefully some more interesting units and upgrades when they add T3 tech and the new race but if the open beta is like 6 months before early access that probably means at least a year away from full release, so they've got plenty of time to work on it. It's a shame to see so much negativity surrounding the beta when it's still clearly unfinished.
Seeing a lot less negative comments these days. Those playing it seem to be liking it from what I've seen!
Who do you like more, Infernal or Vanguard?
Grubby is enjoying playing a complete idiot in chat way too much lmao
Where's the sub sound from? "Everybody's laughing, everybody's happy"?
Dota 2 Hoodwink i think
GGs!
Why does it look like Starcraft?
Does it?
It's almost frustrating to me how derivative this game is while being so rough.
If you're going to save so many dev resources by just copying, why not put those in to design instead?
🤣… Grubby saying he doesn’t like to talk in games! LOL!! Bro your main strat during War3 days was to talk so damn much during a game you couldn’t keep up with the typing then you show up with a lvl 5 TC holding 3 strength belts. Sure bro… you don’t like chatting during a game… just like this one 😆
Sound about right or?
Is it only me that feel all models; down to the trees or stones, either lack depth, width or height, or sometimes 2 out of 3 all at once? I just can't put my finger on it.. WC3 Reforged had a little bit of that problem too when you zoomed out on units, but here it's far more prominent and covers even terrain, elevation levels and ground..
SC2.5 imho
Defenders disadvantage are good because they favor better players. If you are better you should be able to attack faster than your opp. It's gonna get scary when every ivi game will turn into base trade 😂
Defenders disadvantage should be impossible unless you specifically create it for some reason. Now certain mechanics punishing pure turtling is another thing all together
@@zachariastsampasidis8880 its not 5v5 game. In 1v1 mirror matchup being better/faster than your opponent, should be rewarded. In the other way you should be punished for playing worse/slower than your opp.
@@d3adagain385 nah cause that will reduce matches to just worker rushes or some super fast rush only
@@zachariastsampasidis8880 I've never seen health camp 3rd base qorker rush.
@@d3adagain385 If you wanna reward really fast play and give a disadvantage for defenders... your just pushung all ins. You could not even go for macro and probably there would be a 1 base all in which get played every round... soo i think thats a horrible idea.
Being faster dont mean your better. Everyone can go for a 3 Rax All in in SC2 and thats one of the fastest, but... is it the build you need the most skill? Nope.
disappointed he dropped the game, i was disappointed in it but the more i play, the more i like it, would have liked him to give it more of a chance
Real talk; would this game even sell in 2004? I feel like even SC1 has this beat. There's something off-putting about it that can't be described. Like mixing strawberry and chocolate milkshake in one cup. It's like every thing you see in the map looks out of place.
I fail to see how Stormgate is better than warcraft 3 or starcraft 2. It might be new, but graphics seem old and gameplay looks less polished / balanced. There also isn't any "omg" moments, timing attacks feels off, or it lacks the hero impact warcraft 3 has ... It's honestly "meh".
It was DoA from the beggining, specially since they went for the sc2 feeling. I don't see this game being anywhere close to TFT or BW.
I'm not all in love with the visual style. and for some reason, I can't enjoy too much "sweaty" SC2 type gameplay (unless it has the visual impact and fidelity of what SC2 was/broodwar)
I like the infernal faction but vanguard feels really bland and doesn't stand out at all from any generic scifi rts faction either from a visual or gameplay standpoint. If the 3rd (and hopefully potential 4th) race is really good maybe it'll save the game, it's a lot more forgivable to have a bland faction if there are 3 or 4 races instead of just 2. Like I find space marines very bland in 40k but there are so many other factions it doesn't matter.
I find it funny how so much people talk stuff like this yet this is the BETA. Warcraft 3 and Starcraft 2 Beta looked wayyy worse than that.
@@stevenhorstgeorg5728 Exactly. Compare beta footage of Starcraft2 and when the game came out and it's night and day.
i played this game ... its one of the worst games im played... by far
Ami the only one that finds this game terrible xd aoe4 is so much better
Thats just your subjective opinion. I for example think that aoe4 sucks balls dude. SC2 i like way more and Stormgate looks funny and plays good so far
ugly game
Nicestupid spam, now I understand your lklack of level in real RTS games
yeah i agree warcraft 3 is a fake game the only real games is SC2 Arcade Mode Probes vs Zealots, and Heroes of Might and Magic V, grubby is just noob playing fake games
@@Zeus.2459 Okay but heroes of might and magic 5 slaps forreal
OMG so what? I have beat parting twice. Being good in a RTS doesn't make you good in other rts such stupid stigma
schizo comment pog
>have beat parting
Ok buddy
This is what happens when parents don't hug their children