That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate
You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate
They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”
it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid
This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!
9:38 9 flags were raised in response to the word "rape". Rape is, unfortunately, a significant factor in discussions about abortion, as it often leads to women considering abortion due to non-consensual and unintended pregnancies. Nearly half of the people immediately decided to dismiss the speaker. This signifies a great amount of sensitivity towards the topic. These people are uncomfortable discussing rape. I guess it’s easier to debate sunshine and rainbows instead.
@@swagdtrain3574considering 4000 abortions are performed in a day, thats 40 women and girls each day facing that fate in the US alone. then guess the number for the whole world.
Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.
i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.
The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative
It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !
That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.
@@katcelestia which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.
@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video
Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.
@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.
I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth. Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too. I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).
Parker has a lot of knowledge and can recall some information, but he has no idea how to debate lol he was essentially trying to change Charlie's terms and when Charlie would say "no i don't agree with that" (because those weren't the terms he set), Parker would say "see, you're wrong, and I'm destroying you." And then all the pea brains would smirk and laugh and clap.
There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.
Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis. Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.
Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.
you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior
It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked
That was disrespectful for the Parker dude to bring Charlie’s faith into it when that didn’t involve the questions. Then he was just rambling and not making sense thinking he was winning the debate. Weird times…
Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system
IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ... entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....
Parker is probably the most toxic person. He asks a question, then immediately asks another question, then immediately asks another question, then when Charlie goes to answer 1 of the 3 questions, he says “you didn’t answer the question”. Notice that when Charlie asks a question, he allows the others to answer. It’s funny how they all start clapping when Parker is speaking insanely fast, asking 3 to 4 questions every 30 seconds and Charlie is trying to answer just one question. Charlie is brave for doing this. It’s almost impossible for anyone to have a conversation with people like Parker, who don’t allow you to answer while spewing nonsense then when you try to answer they think they’re correct because you weren’t able to get a word in… So sad
This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.
That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.
Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result
when that girl said somthing nasty about his daughter my heart broke after everyone began to clap. what is wrong with this world, wishing ill on a child?
Not neccessarily, sometimes you need to interrupt because they built an argument on a fallacy that has to be corrected before they build up (You can see this a lot where Matt Dillahunty lets them rant for 10 minutes when he was in the Atheist Experience). Sometimes they drift from the main point and what they are saying adds nothing to it. But in this case in particular, yes, the kid was annoying, and drifted from the topic.
didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.
Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.
@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.
Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.
@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views
yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off
This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?
I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂
FROM THE RlVER TO THE SEE!!! 🩸🩸 I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.
I would enjoy this channel a lot more if it was a debate. MEANING: Each side gets to explain their stance WITHOUT interruption, talk-overs, and sticking to context.
Agree. It'd be so beneficial if the person running up to challenge would have to summerize what Charlie just said, and then counter with their thoughts. The same way that it would be beneficial for Charlie to have to summerize what the other person is saying before he spoke.
I wholeheartedly agree, just when someone was trying to come up with a point or an intriguing perspective, they got voted out. While the ones who made no sense continued on. This made me scratch my head out of frustration a lot
Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .
80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.
All college kids should be required to take a debate class. I took it as an elective in High School. It teaches you to look at both sides and logically argue both sides. It also teaches how argue like Civil people.
@@jaymclaughlin739 I think that everyone, upon reaching some milestone of adulthood (age 35-55), should take a history class of recent years. Would help fix a lot of misconceptions.
I will be duel enrolling at a business university in January. And one of the first things I do will be looking for a debate club. I have always been homeschooled so I did not have the opportunity to do one before, but I have thought it would be interesting.
Everybody is talking about how unbearable Parker is but Maren the I’m speaking chick wished some nasty thing to a person cuz she has a totally different belief system.
I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.
That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.
The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.
They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.
He has to talk fast. When you’re objectively incorrect and all of your points can be easily refuted you need to keep moving and changing the conversation.
Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument
As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework
@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.
That kid who talked about church did nothing but interrupt and talk as fast as Eminem 😭 that girl with the “no I’m speaking” thinking yelling shows intelligence
People also still need to remember that social media has made people get way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it
This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.
I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately. We definitely live in a society, my friends
Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees
This is not for every case here but it does feel like I’m watching a realist vs optimists. There’s what the world is and how it is. And then there’s this generation who live in denial of fact and believe that their ideals of the world is the world they can create
Parker pisses me off. There’s a specific topic they’re talking about and he tries to go in and talk about something completely different. And then, he’ll talk over him and act like he’s beating him.
Parker represents himself as rude and immature. His machine gun rapid fire barking is unimpressive to anyone who understands the cognitive processes of the brain during conversation. His fast talking style slowed down when he was trying to answer a question that required thought. Cognitively, it Is easier to bark out fast sentences than to listen, think, consider, formulate a response, and then verbalize the intended response. Anyone who barks out several statements and questions without allowing the listener adequate time to respond to one question before firing another statement and question fails to demonstrate even the most fundamental understanding of the art of conversation.
@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party
@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life
Why is parker just attacking his religion and completely ignoring the main topic in every single instance he gets n the chair, not once but 3 times he changed the subject to attack charlies religion instead of addressing the topic
Because he wants to get Charlie pissed off to get him to say something out of pocket. I’ll give Parker this, he’s a smart kid yet very unwise and condescending.
Because he’s a worm that’s never been punched in his face or been in any other conflict beyond words. He’s the kind of person push someone to physicality, then call the cops once he’s knocked out
@@josephfouche2006 Exactly, if you're going to base your root knowledge on 'religious science' it's already flawed as it requires 'belief' without proof, the biggest argument ever.
lol he speaks so fast trying to make himself seem knowledgeable 😂but I’m sorry he is stable for the first 2 minutes then later he leads off topic so much
It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question. The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.
@ultraprogamerprogamer8090 yes! I've noticed that, once Charlie starts making great points/saying tough things that are hard to hear, they put the flags up & want it to end. Hilarious. Can't handle the opinions of others & further proves they want people to coddle/baby them, even if that means lie...than to hear the truth, even if it hurts.
@@SeverianofNessus nah its because half of these kids haven't actually formed proper opinions on these topics, while charlie's job is literally to formulate and distribute conservative opinions. its not that their opinions were 'wrong' just mostly taken from other sources, without the logical backing where the opinions actually originated.
I thought debates were about, first listening to your opponents logic and arguments, then processing that information, and finding the most logical outcome to the problem of a specific topic together, through analysing each others arguments. Not constantly changing the topic, interrupting the speech of your opponent, in order to justify your own point of view.
Want more? Subscribe👆
do a part two with different liberals this was entertaining asf
Just did 🎤
subbed
charlie kirk vs feminists
Charlie Kirk vs Dean Withers
The fact they applaud the most ignorant ones and vote out the ones actually trying to have a debate is insane
That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate
You're dealing with a death cult. There is no rationality when you are dealing with narcissistic cultists.
Should have guaranteed 1-2 mins to talk
You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate
They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”
what really made me mad is when someone was willing to have a respectful debate and convo they’d vote them out
It's the Liberal way!
it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid
Describes the democratic party perfectly...
No I'm speaking no I'm speaking no I'm speaking
@@ironlordflash4346That is an American Liberal problem. Non American Liberals are commonly NOT like this
Just because you don’t let someone talk, doesn’t mean you’re winning a debate.
That's exactly what im saying
Edit: I have no idea why no one believe me 😂 thanks for the likes tho
This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!
reall
The guy who I will refer to as "Mr.Unbearable" should see this comment
Agreed.
9:38 9 flags were raised in response to the word "rape".
Rape is, unfortunately, a significant factor in discussions about abortion, as it often leads to women considering abortion due to non-consensual and unintended pregnancies.
Nearly half of the people immediately decided to dismiss the speaker. This signifies a great amount of sensitivity towards the topic.
These people are uncomfortable discussing rape. I guess it’s easier to debate sunshine and rainbows instead.
as soon as a real conversation begins the flags get taken out.
It is however blown out of proportions often being used to justify the majority of abortions despite being only 1 percent of cases.
@@swagdtrain3574considering 4000 abortions are performed in a day, thats 40 women and girls each day facing that fate in the US alone. then guess the number for the whole world.
But the pregnant 5 year olds who want to abort are a real problem. Aren't they?
Intelligence and Facts Always beats Stupidity. Go CK
The people who kept raising their flags and never actually debated are making me mad
I was literally thinking the same thing
LITERALLY OMFG IT'S PISSING ME OFF SSOOOOOOO BAD
Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.
@@MatthewMM414 This comment clearly made you react a certain way. Why would you react and leave a comment? Everyone are NPCs in our lives
ikr
As soon as a real conversation starts, the red flags come out.
The real question is America getting taken advantage of to the tune of trillions by Israel.
that sh1tty guy with glasses LOL, hes so annoying.
i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.
Pretty much all working together trying to make him look bad. It didn't work. 😂
Shows you the amount of intelligence in the room...
The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative
exactly. our minds are made up, we only want validation.
It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !
For real, didn’t even let some people finish their points.
true.
That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.
I feel so bad for Deedan. He got up so quick every time and was so respectful, but the flags went up so quick. He genuinely wanted to have debate.
11 people vote for a new person, yet only 3 run for the chair. That says a lot.
sooo true!
Sadly yes
Facts
It does. And it's a shame. But more than anything, it shows that leadership isn't easy.
“Someone else go speak for me, I don’t know the lines for this one!”
i don’t care what side you’re on, personal attacks and rude behavior will never do your argument any justice.
edit: yall need to heal fr
Spot on, sadly we award mediocrary in the form of humor and a lot of times this humor is deprivating.
Usually what the woke liberals do when they feel like they’re losing a debate
@@katcelestia which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.
@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video
@@nicholassok5797always, every time.
The ones who actually knew how to debate were voted out when the real conversations started 😂
It's not that they were voted out specifically, it's that these people were riled up as well and really wanted to sit on the chair themselves.
@@aceman0000099I get what you mean but normally the first few people that raised their flags never went to the chair 😭
@@Madison.13yr maybe they were undercover conservatives
It's called leftism
Of course. They were all taught by woke professors, who scream, cry and become violent when proven wrong, just like a toddler.
The people who kept raising their flags and never actually debated are making me mad😭😭
IT WAS SO ANNOYINGG
Exact copy of someone elses comment. Why not be original?
@@ladybonezz8017 i didnt copy anything??
@@ladybonezz8017 People can have the same opinions.
you literally copied word for word
The idiots voting out the people actually making valid points is so irritating omgggg
Your team 😂
Omg Fr and most of them weren’t even participating in the debate
there was not a single valid point of them
That is how the world works, that why we are here !
realest
WHY ARE THEY PULLING THEIR FLAGS OUT WHEN THE CONVERSATION IS LITERALLY SO REAL
Because they don’t like hearing the facts. It hurts their feelings 😢
@@athenabbb True that!
Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.
Because he´s speaking the truth. That means "he´s winning". They can´t have that...
They are scared of the truth. That's all.
I like how the ppl who were respectful and nice got voted off in like a min, just tells u the type of ppl in that room
To add, they only cheered for emotional behavior lmao
> Talk over charlie: cheer
> Rude comment: cheer
> Speak emotionally: cheer
@@random-eh2lv Yup, that "what if your daughter" girl smh
@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.
This is why Shorts and Tiktok is the main source of news for this generation.
I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth.
Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too.
I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).
Parker has a lot of knowledge and can recall some information, but he has no idea how to debate lol he was essentially trying to change Charlie's terms and when Charlie would say "no i don't agree with that" (because those weren't the terms he set), Parker would say "see, you're wrong, and I'm destroying you." And then all the pea brains would smirk and laugh and clap.
He was pissing me off
You can't argue with kids like Parker who is having the entire argument in his own head while pretending to talk someone else 😂
@@morenpchangjw8868 he wasn’t even letting him talk
Honestly this Parker was irritating..... My goodness...., he thinks he knows it all and was just blabbering. I actually feel sorry for him.
Parker needs more testosterone it appears
If you're not angry enough or condescending enough, the group votes you out. lol.
Yep. They vote out the people having an actual debate/conversation, but keep parker who is annoying loud, arrogant, fast loud talking.
They’ll literally start clapping and laughing if you throw insults at him
There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.
Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis.
Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.
Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.
you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior
typical liberal behavior
All cowards
FR BRUH it pisses me off bc literally wtf
That’s what most liberals/ Wokes are brother it’s really sad…
His face Pisses me off
People should have immunity of not being voted out for at least a minute, it would improve the format
🌝
I like that but I think most were in there for a min or 2 but we onky got clips here and there
A-frikkin-men
It was edited for brevity
It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked
That was disrespectful for the Parker dude to bring Charlie’s faith into it when that didn’t involve the questions. Then he was just rambling and not making sense thinking he was winning the debate. Weird times…
Ye like he’s the type of guy to walk into a bar argue about the bartenders favourite drink when he was asked what drink he wanted.
He's popping on adderal 😂
That’s how Parker is. You can’t say 3 words without him interrupting
He thought he ate
I’m not liking the fact that literally anytime an individual is trying to debate RESPECTFULLY, they vote them out.
I saw that to. Hurting themselves & blind to their chains.
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(事實上就是，共和黨比較有人類道德觀，以人為本；民主黨比較沒有人類道德觀，不以人為本！)
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(美國民主黨執政更惨，已經成為無法控制的大怪獸了！)
例如：同性婚，廢死刑，邪淫(才有墮胎)，殺生，偷盜，妄言，綺語，兩舌，惡口，吸毒，搶劫，干涉各國内政，製造更多仇恨。(美國一年大約一千名警察死於槍下！)
佛陀大覺者預言，人類會越來越沒有道德心，放縱私欲的結果，就是世界越沈淪！
中國人從古至今，受到聖賢的教導，保有一定的禮儀，善良。(只有少數個案，整體上還是好的。)
❤😊😊😊😊😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊@@PhoenixFirestorm77
Especially when they just didn’t like what Charlie was saying
Yea because that’s how they are if you do not believe are agree with them they do not want to hear it.
Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system
It's their own friends voting each other off, it's funny 🤣
It’s the only way they can feed the gen z entitlement 😂
@@British_Tanker. Its not a real discussion either. This is set up to be a lay up for that weirdo.
@@DBQ42 only a loser would say 25 v 1 is set up for charlie.
@@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNORit literally is. Not only is this his specialty, but they all got taken out before they could rebuttal 🤷🏻♂️
Why do they vote out the ones that are genuinely trying to debate but leave the ones who get emotional and just scream??
Because they are fighting against his views, whenever he creates a point that will affect the debate they vote the person out
They aren't there willing to listen
@@lezardvyexactly, I feel bad for these kids since they have no idea how much they’ve been brainwashed
Well i mean if u think about it most Liberals are just emotional fruit cakes by default 😂
IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ...
entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....
Parker is probably the most toxic person. He asks a question, then immediately asks another question, then immediately asks another question, then when Charlie goes to answer 1 of the 3 questions, he says “you didn’t answer the question”. Notice that when Charlie asks a question, he allows the others to answer. It’s funny how they all start clapping when Parker is speaking insanely fast, asking 3 to 4 questions every 30 seconds and Charlie is trying to answer just one question. Charlie is brave for doing this. It’s almost impossible for anyone to have a conversation with people like Parker, who don’t allow you to answer while spewing nonsense then when you try to answer they think they’re correct because you weren’t able to get a word in… So sad
Probably a snob😂
Charlie Kirk did that as well buddy......
the thing is that is exactly the same way Charlie Kirk treated everyone, Parker only mirrored his way of debating
Charlie literally ask one question “what is a women?” and they just avoid to answer that question, no its not the same
The fact he went up twice within like 5 minutes in a room with 24 other people is pretty telling
I would like to see the reverse of this as well, 25 conservative young people against 1 media ready liberal
As long as it's not parker.
Probably get that destiny guy to do it.
Destiny. That would be a perfect chaos.
Dani would be great
Honestly I’d like to see destiny do it
Who gave Parker 2 monsters and a line of cocaine before this debate?
I don’t know, but I thank them for it.
Best RUclips comment I’ve ever seen
@@InvaderMedia420me too😭
@@supdog12hi
Parker without his mute button can't debate anyone as usual, his place is in his TikTok's not in a debate room
The concept of being voted out so quickly by your peers demonstrates the callous disregard of views that differ from your own.
This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.
That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.
Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result
Well said 🤔.
Well said
when that girl said somthing nasty about his daughter my heart broke after everyone began to clap. what is wrong with this world, wishing ill on a child?
What she did was disgusting.
shes every father is nightmare
It was terrible and I worry for American society
Words per minute is NOT a measure of intelligence, and interrupting surely is a sign of intolerance.
💯
Not neccessarily, sometimes you need to interrupt because they built an argument on a fallacy that has to be corrected before they build up (You can see this a lot where Matt Dillahunty lets them rant for 10 minutes when he was in the Atheist Experience).
Sometimes they drift from the main point and what they are saying adds nothing to it.
But in this case in particular, yes, the kid was annoying, and drifted from the topic.
@Alientcp not really you can debunk their point after they are finished.
Kamala
intolerance? I don't think you know what that means lol
Whoever didn’t talk over Charlie and be completely disrespectful got red flagged. These people are ridiculous
Charlie talked over EVERYONE
@@ghostwmost4938no he didn’t he was talking and got talked over and just kept talking very different
didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.
@@whisperissleepimgzzzparker
@@ghostwmost4938 It was mostly back and forth.
It annoys me how when a real conversation where they find a middle ground, everyone raises their red flags
Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.
@@b3sso862I still don’t understand what the red flags mean
The liberals hive mind.. squash truth and sensibility at all cost.. no rationale allowed . I have to scream my point of view first
Yeah, they want to get their loser out and hopefully find someone who can interrupt Charlie better
@@acceptibilation5506 and they look orange to me.
The scoff at 31:10 when he says plumbers, welders, and electricians. So disrespectful
Scoffing at jobs that make sure everything runs as smoothly as possible
They should change it up. The first time that a personal attack is used, you're automatically disqualified.
I would love to see that one the conversation would be shut down even quicker than they already are
upvote
I love that, wish we’d do that IRL
None of them would ever be able to speak.
Agreed
why were people raising their flags so fast? this wasnt even a full discussion, people kept getting cut off
They wanted to end the conversation when it became clear their side was losing ground.
@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.
@@Jagged-Dust-Jacket Yeah it's not ideal. But it is an interesting idea and fun to watch.
Democrats 😂😂
Because if there was even remotely a hint of thinking differently than the mass thought, they wanted them gone
Today I learned that debates are 85% asking questions back and forth and only 15% answering each other's questions
Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.
Aww you watched the presidential debate I see
This is true for the liberal crowd. Charlie Kirk almost never get to finish his answer.
Also to just make ridiculous comparisons
Bc he always interrupts ppl.@@_w_w_
its really funny to me because none of them have knowledge about biology, BASIC BIOLOGY.
YES THANK YOU
Whenever you have to attack someone personally, all grounds you had of debate are gone.
Yeah I wish Charlie went a lil harder on metal face for making fun of HIS smile
@@Anonymous38572metal face…?
@@Anonymous38572wait who's metal face
@@Anonymous38572 womp womp lil bro
@@Anonymous38572
He's way too nice to do that.
The concept of rushing the chair is weird. Do it by random choice.
Yeah, that was a bit weird. Felt a little too aggressive for the type of video this is supposed to be.
Yep and then the person who gets to the chair first doesn’t know what they’re talking about or the convo goes nowhere like in the beginning with Naima
no. i like watching liberals try and exert energy. they don't do it often.
Why do they have others raise the flags for different speakers? Is it because they think the speaker sucks?
@@DrewTBG Bruh, the healthiest states are all liberal leaning ones you dork.
Charlie Kirk: "Hello, nice to meet you."
Liberal: "Hel-"
*11/21 flags raised*
😂😂😂😂
Liberals 🙄
@@NoName-1239 it happened the same with you republicans and Dean... its annoying... everyone just wants to have their chance at the spotlight
@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views
@@angelusmortis3256 Libfart.
Conclusion after listening to these 25 college students:
College might actually be a scam
They kept voting out the speaker way too early on, at least let them try to make a point...
they had no arguments except attacking the person not the argument
yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off
@@MJ-mi9qc It's cause he was exactly parroting the current woke liberal thought process. Any deviation and it's bad.
@@MJ-mi9qc its because he said he agreed that abortion after 20 weeks or whatever shouldn't be legal.
Yeah it's really annoying. They should give them at least 1 minute and then after that time they can be voted out.
This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?
Most people talk to speak and be heard and too few people listen and respond.
@@alexrice1870Conversations are not one directional. Just because someone is speaking doesn't mean that you're only supposed to listen and respond.
That kid just wanted to think he was smarter 🤡
sadly that's how 'debates' work nowadays
Fr
A debate between parker and Ben Shapiro would need to be played at .25 speed for anyone to be able to understand.
And zero valid points would be made on either end
I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂
@@nylens471 goodluck trying to get them to understand that...
Honestly the most well suited person to debate ben is probably some no name in highschool
@@taylortiwari7118yooo you can predict the future???? That's crazy bro
That uh, that quote about Kamala Harris destroying Republicans in the polls, it aged very well.
The black guy never spoke but the camera keeps panning to him whenever the topic is on black people😂😂😂
HAHAHAHA
I remember that Key & Peele skit where the camera guy shows Jordan everytime Key mentioned gay lmao
@@aceapolonio7284lmao I know the one your talking about that's funny after 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yep,
@@aceapolonio7284Bro facts 😂😂
The first girl got voted out because she didn’t agree with abortion. I actually wanted to hear what she had to say
She got voted out becuase the liberals can’t bear to listen to an opinion that’s not theirs
FROM THE RlVER TO THE SEE!!! 🩸🩸
I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.
@@OsirusIrdia So we dont want to hear peoples opinions???? If u hate freedom of speech that bad i suggest you go to North korea
@@MasterChief968yea exactly. They didn’t wanna hear eachother speak they just wanted to speak 😂
@@MasterChief968crazy world we live in
I would enjoy this channel a lot more if it was a debate. MEANING: Each side gets to explain their stance WITHOUT interruption, talk-overs, and sticking to context.
Agree. It'd be so beneficial if the person running up to challenge would have to summerize what Charlie just said, and then counter with their thoughts. The same way that it would be beneficial for Charlie to have to summerize what the other person is saying before he spoke.
I wholeheartedly agree, just when someone was trying to come up with a point or an intriguing perspective, they got voted out. While the ones who made no sense continued on. This made me scratch my head out of frustration a lot
Im gona tell you a secret ;) It is but you can clearly see who doesnt want a debate and who is interupting when with flags and overtalking.
yes i would also enjoy it if it is in debate format, that way, there isn’t another debate about who isn’t letting another person finish😂
Being obnoxious in a debate does not mean you are winning Parker!
First girl: I’m a catholic
Everyone: 🚩🚩🚩🚩
Yeah that was ridiculous, the moment you have a slightly different view, 🚩🚩🚩? Like you aren’t letting her debate in any sense…
Yup being Catholic and a liberal is a an oxymoron.. She will have to chose soon
@@MrMonchis04why?
@@MrMonchis04lmao. Wait until you learn human history.
Edit: sorry, meant to say American history. My b
@@MrMonchis04 She's a wanna be catholic. Only applies what she likes and forgets what she doesn't.
I hated the flags. It really disrupted the conversations.
Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .
The flags mostly kept the less intelligent arguments from continuing to actual point
80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.
The conservative one is night and day. Lol
I really hate the rush to the chair. I mean we have the technology to randomly select people. It's a one-line script command. Weird.
This for sure raised my blood pressure 😂
Hahaha... Me too!
0:32 no no no no no no no no I’m speaking I’m speaking. I am speaking no no no I’m speaking.😂😂😂
One of my favorite things on this planet, is when people think that laughing at someones argument suddenly makes them correct
Frrr
or laughing at information or words they dont know or understand to protect their ego and make the speaker look like the ignorant one
That's their last line of defense before their ego goes flat!
Urban basketball people do that. It’s astounding to witness. 🤓
It's childish.
The red flags are great examples to show just how *quick* the students were to “kick” each other out, if they said something wrong.
Absolutely, lol. Not towing the line.
Not something “wrong” but different from their opinions. What happened to open minded individuals.
I noticed that too. Reflective of their society.
14% of the population should run over half of everything? thats not “inclusive” for the 86% ?
Remember the slaves were sacked and sold into slavery by other blacks (moors slave traders)
All college kids should be required to take a debate class. I took it as an elective in High School. It teaches you to look at both sides and logically argue both sides. It also teaches how argue like Civil people.
Facts. This is just pure chaos.
All Americans should have to take a history test. 😂 90% would fail. So sad.....
@@jaymclaughlin739 I think that everyone, upon reaching some milestone of adulthood (age 35-55), should take a history class of recent years. Would help fix a lot of misconceptions.
I will be duel enrolling at a business university in January. And one of the first things I do will be looking for a debate club. I have always been homeschooled so I did not have the opportunity to do one before, but I have thought it would be interesting.
Everybody is talking about how unbearable Parker is but Maren the I’m speaking chick wished some nasty thing to a person cuz she has a totally different belief system.
*respectful debate begins*
Students:🚩🚩🚩🚩
*nasty debate ends*
Students: 🙌🏻👏🏻
yeah yeah , this is soooo sillyyyy
*"you are nasty" *
Students: 🤝🤝🤝
Whole lotta potato brained people in that room
Not only clapping hands, but stupidly snapping fingers??😂😂😂😂
Those kids are whack
I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.
You'd have to track so many people and trust that they wouldn't screw the rules over. It wouldn't be efficient.
@@benjaminmedrano4493 have one person per person for tracking
That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.
@@GrowMasterGeneral I didn't really care for the rush to the chair. That's not really what debate is about. Interesting, but inconsequential.
If it were the other way round the conservatives wouldn't do that.
The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.
He was being too polite and wasn't yelling insults, which showed the group that he wasn't a woke individual
They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.
Definitely polite, knowledgeable, and wrong lol
True, but its still pre conception
Almost seems like they voted him off to make Kirk stop talking lmfao.
Parker is acting on my nerves so much. That guy only kept interrupting and offending. I hope he never gets to speak publically again
He has to talk fast. When you’re objectively incorrect and all of your points can be easily refuted you need to keep moving and changing the conversation.
why did that one girl even come into the argument without the proper knowledge of what a C SECTION is
fr tho
She didn't know the full term cesarean section, but she understood when he said c section
@@Hippyhop888her comment still stands. u come into a convo w bare minimum education and most the things she said get debunked w ease.
Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument
and these are the same people that can vote, smh
This debate format sucks. The second you start getting a decent debate they vote the person out
It is awful which is why it is hilarious.
Agreed, it's literally so unproductive and horrible 😂
does this shows the real true of them. selfish.
The less woke people speak the better
Lefties don't like debates.
As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework
Me too bruh. The arguments are BONKERS, the premise BONKERS
Wokism at its finest, stop discussing points when they are no longer relevant to what you feel.
Independent aka republican 😂
i would argue that there were many valid points. mostly from the krik side but also from the liberal side.
@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.
That kid who talked about church did nothing but interrupt and talk as fast as Eminem 😭 that girl with the “no I’m speaking” thinking yelling shows intelligence
bruh why are they waiving the flags for great arguments like wtf
What are the flags suppose to mean
Cause people don't wanna hear the truth
I think part of it is because they can answer the question better. And/or they just want to be heard
@@AlphaSporeGamingit means they are voting to switch the person out of the chair
@@nahyouremad correct but for example I feel like at this part 7:48 they raised the flags just to shut him up.
Proverbs 18:2, “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but in expressing his own opinion” pretty much sums up all these jubilee videos
Amen
Amen
Amen
Amin
Exactly.
This is prime example of listening to respond rather than listening to learn…
On both sides.
@@Cyanpatagonus 100 percent
Yes. I’m glad you commented this.
I dont think I have ever seen, on this scale, this type of the arrogance of ignorance in my life.
"I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING!"
16:36 “my mom that told me Santa Claus was real” ummm Parker, I’m a little concerned for you
I found it extremely annoying that people trying to have an actual debate get voted out, but people like Parker get to talk the most
Parker is a big TT guy that does hours and hours of debate and makes bank. He's annoying AF.
@@Skirraq um no wtf i thought parker was great ?
@@makananigraceof course you did, talking fast and with dialect doesn’t equate to making strong points….
@@makananigraceI’ve seen Parker’s debates on TikTok’s and I was really excited, but he was the only one who actually really annoyed me I’m ngl
@@makananigrace😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 No. No.
People also still need to remember that social media has made people get way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it
You think that being personally offended is a valid reason to hit someone?
@@adellaopthofdella2385 no but being insulted to your face is no matter who u are
Stole from Mike Tyson.
@@piojo51 I meant to quote him lol
@@adellaopthofdella2385 it is 😂 tf
That one dude who just couldn’t stop bringing up religion when it had nothing to do with the subject was annoying. He’d make a terrible lawyer.
He didnt want a dialogue he wanted a monologue.
@@shinineagle23 parker sucks
I want to ask him what "Christian" cult he grew up in. Nobody has that much animosity for something without it being personal.
Agreed
It rlly was so annoying. He hates Christianity so much he can’t even stay on the actual topic.
I think parker jumping to different conversations and very fast was to make himself feel like he was winning the argument.
This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.
It was pretty wild how emotionally unhinged these kids are...and I'm just 5 minutes in 😂
@@DChris3 It gets worse.
Charlie called the guy Impotent how is that not a personal attack?
He called the argument impotent...that is a different meaning@@ozzier9483
@@DChris3for real. That one girl was throwing so much of a fit that she may as well just laid on the floor and started kicking her feet.
I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately.
We definitely live in a society, my friends
That's the first thing I knew how this would go when they didn't let her get past "I'm Catholic"
Great debates from everyone but the tall girl who looks like offspring from Alien Romulus, Destiny, and a literal demon.
Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees
I thought that was crazy too.
She was going about her argument rationally. Soon as religion is mentioned, she’s out.
they all wanted to see a dunk from their tribe...thats what our conversations are being reduced to
Parker ignored every single topic and just attacked his faith. Im not religious, but that was pathetic. What a POS.
One of the most irritating brats there
That's because charlie kurt sees himself as christian nationalists
yea he annoyed me too, the interrupting argument, not debates needs an i got you moment for his tiki toki
I feel like I’ve seen Parker on tik tok
@@AbimaelLopez-hz3qqI"m sorry you had to see that. 😐
This is not for every case here but it does feel like I’m watching a realist vs optimists. There’s what the world is and how it is. And then there’s this generation who live in denial of fact and believe that their ideals of the world is the world they can create
This is actually painful to watch. When someone actually has a valid point red flags pop up.
i think it's refreshing... to realize that you aren't off as bad as some of us
I know huh , even more painful to think how much their parents paid for their indoctrination
which ones had a valid point in your opinion..?
@@Sweep-u5k that’s what I was trying to figure out
This is evidence that the world is approaching the point of no return
"My name is-"
*11 red flags, disqualified*
slim shady
😂😂
The flags go up as soon as their feelings get hurt. Just to stop the subject
Seriously who designed this show
@@Digger-NickI think it was liberals and the comment section is not going the way they thought it would 🤔
everybody raising their flags on that one girl who barely had 2 mins to talk, they literally are so rude
time stamp?
@@kairavideshpande6508 I got you: 8:39
I checked the amount of time, she had 44 seconds to talk
Because she sucked
I mean, she didn’t even know what a cesarean section is lol
Parker pisses me off. There’s a specific topic they’re talking about and he tries to go in and talk about something completely different. And then, he’ll talk over him and act like he’s beating him.
The rushing to the chair is so ridiculous..
yes especially since some are sitting on the back wont make it as fast as people who are sitting in front of him
fr
thats part of his tactic of putting them off their game.
@@slapshotLC thats cope and an excuse
Yeah they could’ve easily had a random name ballot
The red flags made me so mad because they weren’t even contributing
They are used to just watching it all on tv that’s why
Yea they didn’t even let Lily speak even if she didn’t know what she was talking about
And sitting there thinking they're smart and know better. LOSERS. 😊
I think everyone should have had an iq test before the show and they show it while they speak
Welcome to everyone who voted Democrat
Parker represents himself
as rude and immature. His machine gun rapid fire barking is unimpressive to anyone who understands the cognitive processes of the brain during conversation. His fast talking style slowed down when he was trying to answer a question that required thought. Cognitively, it Is easier to bark out fast sentences than to listen, think, consider, formulate a response, and then verbalize the intended response. Anyone who barks out several statements and questions without allowing the listener adequate time to respond to one question before firing another statement and question fails to demonstrate even the most fundamental understanding of the art of conversation.
Ong
It’s crazy how 25 people who share the same opinion, struggle to share the same opinion.
People can agree with a topic and desagree with other topic, it would be the same if as 25 conservatives
Being in one political party does not make you agree with every single point of that party
It’s crazy how wtvr u commented here doesn’t make sense at all
@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party
that’s not crazy… that’s called being an individual, everyone isnt just a carbon copy of eachother.
"I don't know what a c-section is". 11 flags immediately.
She never said she doesn't know what a c section is, she just didn't know the full term. Still a valid reason to vote her out.
@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life
@@misfitm1457That is just false
@@misfitm1457 So its bad to save the life of the mother and the child?
She didn't deserve that
Why is parker just attacking his religion and completely ignoring the main topic in every single instance he gets n the chair, not once but 3 times he changed the subject to attack charlies religion instead of addressing the topic
Because he wants to get Charlie pissed off to get him to say something out of pocket. I’ll give Parker this, he’s a smart kid yet very unwise and condescending.
@@andrewmoriarty3359id say he's intelligent but not smart.
Because his main reasons are coming from his religion so you have to “attack” the basis to understand.
Because he’s a worm that’s never been punched in his face or been in any other conflict beyond words. He’s the kind of person push someone to physicality, then call the cops once he’s knocked out
@@josephfouche2006 Exactly, if you're going to base your root knowledge on 'religious science' it's already flawed as it requires 'belief' without proof, the biggest argument ever.
This is why I personally think the others shouldn't have a choice to stop the debate. It leaves more topics untouched💢💢
Parker made me check to make sure I didn’t have my video on 2x speed.
He is absolutely lost, it’s insane that he tried to use the Bible yet has never read/studied it.
lol he speaks so fast trying to make himself seem knowledgeable 😂but I’m sorry he is stable for the first 2 minutes then later he leads off topic so much
I had mine on 1.5 and he was hard to understand lol
I did the same thing 😂😂😂
Dude's the liberal Ben Shapiro. The speed of Shapiro but the ideals, mannerisms, temperament, and attitude of a liberal
It's difficult to win a debate against a smart person. it's impossible to win a debate against an ignorant person.
Its like humans keep getting dumber each year. This is why i stay far away from them.
It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question.
The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.
@@ESquaredSolutions Respectful? They insulted him constantly lol
@@j.t.8685 I dont think so
@@ESquaredSolutions hahaha 'respectful' they sounded like a bunch of reddtors
just because someone is interrupting , talking louder and faster doesn't mean they are winning the argument lol
Come on now, don't ruin their whole plan.
Also if you’re actually winning the debate you don’t have to constantly say you’re winning the debate 😂😂😂
so what Charlie Kirk does all the time?
Fr so annoying
@@kayla9973shut up I’m speaking
Listening to Parker regurgitate the definition of a woman was peek cringe
anyone can be a woman and have access to their toilets, yay :D gen z feminists were scammed at college
seriously like didnt school teach us that we cant use the word were defining in the definition of the word?? Like eesh
Pray for Parker
He’s too much.
He’s so focused on religion, it’s annoying
Parker’s obsession with Christianity was ultimately his downfall. Completely avoided the main topic
He was there to get content for his TikTok not to debate. It's all about "gotcha" moments and not intelligent discourse
Parker = beta
The moment he defined what a woman is was the moment that he was yapping more than Charlie
yeah, questions was about women and he keeps bring up Charlie's faith.
Typical lost kid. 😂
Noticed that anyone that remotely agreed with Charlie instantly got red flags?
They're just children trying to aggravate the adult.
Communism loves censorship
Charlie is Zionist lol
I wonder why 😑
Yeah because all this kids are not smart and can’t think for themselves. They just listen to their professors.
Why are all their arguments just "OH SO YOU THINK THAT" and "BUT WHAT IF?!"
Rude behavior is a clear sign of weak argument and you loose automatically.
boo hoo
@@turbotaro3714you’re one of the people he’s talking about sad to see
@@turbotaro3714lol proving his point
@@turbotaro3714proving his point is crazy lil bro
@@tei_the_boy2367 you just used an insult. Because of this you have a weak argument and have thus lost. I’ll take my medal by mail.
I love how people start putting up their flags when the person starts agreeing with Charlie
It’s because they struggle in a debate setting, not because they agree
@@apexnp It's because they are learning in real time that their opinions are incorrect
It’s cause they are hearing things they don’t like
And the person arguing on their behalf is losing the arguement
@ultraprogamerprogamer8090 yes! I've noticed that, once Charlie starts making great points/saying tough things that are hard to hear, they put the flags up & want it to end. Hilarious. Can't handle the opinions of others & further proves they want people to coddle/baby them, even if that means lie...than to hear the truth, even if it hurts.
@@SeverianofNessus nah its because half of these kids haven't actually formed proper opinions on these topics, while charlie's job is literally to formulate and distribute conservative opinions. its not that their opinions were 'wrong' just mostly taken from other sources, without the logical backing where the opinions actually originated.
i’d love an entire episode of this where its just charlie and dean for an hour and a half
no fr
Pls jubilee
Charlie - "hey mum can you venmo me 3,000 dollars so I can go out an extra night" how out of touch with society is this guy? 😊
@@ryanlee6920 obvious exaggeration
@@ryanlee6920its hyperbole you fool
I thought debates were about, first listening to your opponents logic and arguments, then processing that information, and finding the most logical outcome to the problem of a specific topic together, through analysing each others arguments. Not constantly changing the topic, interrupting the speech of your opponent, in order to justify your own point of view.
Why do they think being rude supports their points
@@cakes.magick they think they are entitled to disrespect. I certainly hope they are enjoying the election results.
When
@@junefousek3644did you not watch the video?
Because they're still children mentally.
Because they hate something about him...do you know what that is ?