Can 25 Liberal College Students Outsmart 1 Conservative? (feat. Charlie Kirk) | Surrounded
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 сен 2024
- Go to SAN.com/surrou... to get unbiased, straight facts. You can Download the app through our link or search Straight Arrow News in your app store.
Hey you 👈 Wanna be in a Jubilee video? bit.ly/be-in-a...
LET’S BE FRIENDS
Instagram: / jubileemedia
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Website: www.jubileemed...
OUR LOVE + DATING CHANNEL 🍑
RUclips: / @lovecommanectar
Instagram: / lovecommanectar
Nectar app: lovecommanecta...
ARE YOU A BRAND? WANNA WORK WITH US?
Email partnerships@jubileemedia.com
FEATURING
Charlie: / @realcharliekirk
Alize: / alizefuentes
Amanda: / azueagu
Ava: / avadotcom
Brad: / bradbrady_
Camryn: / hyssopae
Dedan: / dedankaggio
Emily: / emilytsuge
Greg: / greg.anywhere
Lily: / lilyolsonn
Maddie: / m.addie.n.8
Maddox: / maddoxconrady
Maren: / marencarrere
Mason: / onehandpolitics
Naima: / hair.soup
Noah: / sleepyb0i10
Parker: / parkergetajob
Sage: / whoa.its.sage
Sam: x.com/1Frosty_...
Juliana: / juliana.furio
Dean: / deanwithrs
CREDITS
Director: Sunce Franicevic
Casting Coordinator: Bridget McGuinness
Casting Associate Producer: Karsyn Hughes
Production Manager: Emma Pek
Directory of Photography: Heaven Saulo
Assistant Editor: Kirsten Hoang
Editor: @Indy Dang
Want more? Subscribe👆
do a part two with different liberals this was entertaining asf
Just did 🎤
subbed
charlie kirk vs feminists
Charlie Kirk vs Dean Withers
As soon as a real conversation starts, the red flags come out.
The real question is America getting taken advantage of to the tune of trillions by Israel.
that sh1tty guy with glasses LOL, hes so annoying.
i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.
Pretty much all working together trying to make him look bad. It didn't work. 😂
Shows you the amount of intelligence in the room...
The fact they applaud the most ignorant ones and vote out the ones actually trying to have a debate is insane
That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate
You're dealing with a death cult. There is no rationality when you are dealing with narcissistic cultists.
Should have guaranteed 1-2 mins to talk
You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate
They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”
what really made me mad is when someone was willing to have a respectful debate and convo they’d vote them out
It's the Liberal way!
it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid
it’s immature, turns everyone off when they start yelling. you see charlie he doesnt raise his voice. just passive aggression which is what a fair argument stems from.
Describes the democratic party perfectly...
No I'm speaking no I'm speaking no I'm speaking
Parker needs to be taught how to be respectful. He loves to hear himself speak and doesn’t want anyone else to speak. He thinks he is the smartest person when clearly he has no reasoning skills. He thinks talking fast and interrupting people makes him look smart but he’s just a lonely narcissist
Indeed
talking fast and interrupting people is exactly what charlie is doing.
He also loves bringing up topics that have nothing to do with the current topic. College is a scam yet he wants to talk about religion.
💯
yeah i usually liked parker’s lives bro but this was so embarrassing
The ones who actually knew how to debate were voted out when the real conversations started 😂
It's not that they were voted out specifically, it's that these people were riled up as well and really wanted to sit on the chair themselves.
@@aceman0000099I get what you mean but normally the first few people that raised their flags never went to the chair 😭
@@Madison.13yr maybe they were undercover conservatives
It's called leftism
Of course. They were all taught by woke professors, who scream, cry and become violent when proven wrong, just like a toddler.
The people who kept raising their flags and never actually debated are making me mad
I was literally thinking the same thing
LITERALLY OMFG IT'S PISSING ME OFF SSOOOOOOO BAD
Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.
@@MatthewMM414 This comment clearly made you react a certain way. Why would you react and leave a comment? Everyone are NPCs in our lives
ikr
I’m not liking the fact that literally anytime an individual is trying to debate RESPECTFULLY, they vote them out.
I saw that to. Hurting themselves & blind to their chains.
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(事實上就是，共和黨比較有人類道德觀，以人為本；民主黨比較沒有人類道德觀，不以人為本！)
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(美國民主黨執政更惨，已經成為無法控制的大怪獸了！)
例如：同性婚，廢死刑，邪淫(才有墮胎)，殺生，偷盜，妄言，綺語，兩舌，惡口，吸毒，搶劫，干涉各國内政，製造更多仇恨。(美國一年大約一千名警察死於槍下！)
佛陀大覺者預言，人類會越來越沒有道德心，放縱私欲的結果，就是世界越沈淪！
中國人從古至今，受到聖賢的教導，保有一定的禮儀，善良。(只有少數個案，整體上還是好的。)
❤😊😊😊😊😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊@@mechellestriler4079
Especially when they just didn’t like what Charlie was saying
Yea because that’s how they are if you do not believe are agree with them they do not want to hear it.
The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative
exactly. our minds are made up, we only want validation.
It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !
For real, didn’t even let some people finish their points.
true.
That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.
If you're not angry enough or condescending enough, the group votes you out. lol.
Yep. They vote out the people having an actual debate/conversation, but keep parker who is annoying loud, arrogant, fast loud talking.
They’ll literally start clapping and laughing if you throw insults at him
There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.
Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis.
Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.
Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.
People should have immunity of not being voted out for at least a minute, it would improve the format
🌝
I like that but I think most were in there for a min or 2 but we onky got clips here and there
A-frikkin-men
It was edited for brevity
It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked
WHY ARE THEY PULLING THEIR FLAGS OUT WHEN THE CONVERSATION IS LITERALLY SO REAL
Because they don’t like hearing the facts. It hurts their feelings 😢
@@athenabbb True that!
Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.
Because he´s speaking the truth. That means "he´s winning". They can´t have that...
They are scared of the truth. That's all.
Just because you don’t let someone talk, doesn’t mean you’re winning a debate.
That's exactly what im saying
This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!
reall
The guy who I will refer to as "Mr.Unbearable" should see this comment
Agreed.
The idiots voting out the people actually making valid points is so irritating omgggg
Your team 😂
Omg Fr and most of them weren’t even participating in the debate
there was not a single valid point of them
That is how the world works, that why we are here !
realest
First girl: I’m a catholic
Everyone: 🚩🚩🚩🚩
Yeah that was ridiculous, the moment you have a slightly different view, 🚩🚩🚩? Like you aren’t letting her debate in any sense…
Yup being Catholic and a liberal is a an oxymoron.. She will have to chose soon
@@MrMonchis04why?
@@MrMonchis04lmao. Wait until you learn human history.
Edit: sorry, meant to say American history. My b
@@MrMonchis04 She's a wanna be catholic. Only applies what she likes and forgets what she doesn't.
you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior
typical liberal behavior
All cowards
FR BRUH it pisses me off bc literally wtf
That’s what most liberals/ Wokes are brother it’s really sad…
His face Pisses me off
It annoys me how when a real conversation where they find a middle ground, everyone raises their red flags
Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.
@@b3sso862I still don’t understand what the red flags mean
Children just want a podium to scream and call attention to themselves. It’s how Gen Z was raised.
The liberals hive mind.. squash truth and sensibility at all cost.. no rationale allowed . I have to scream my point of view first
Yeah, they want to get their loser out and hopefully find someone who can interrupt Charlie better
This isn't a 25 vs Charlie Kirk. It's a 25 vs each other. By voting out their peers, they are strengthening Charlie
True
Facts: Liberals hate Conservatives but they prefer to eat their own kind.
They are so close minded, the ignorance is bliss. They can’t even see it, says a lot about the IQ.
Charlie knows this from the beginning 😂
True facts
I like how the ppl who were respectful and nice got voted off in like a min, just tells u the type of ppl in that room
To add, they only cheered for emotional behavior lmao
> Talk over charlie: cheer
> Rude comment: cheer
> Speak emotionally: cheer
@@random-eh2lv Yup, that "what if your daughter" girl smh
@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.
This is why Shorts and Tiktok is the main source of news for this generation.
I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth.
Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too.
I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).
The black guy never spoke but the camera keeps panning to him whenever the topic is on black people😂😂😂
HAHAHAHA
I remember that Key & Peele skit where the camera guy shows Jordan everytime Key mentioned gay lmao
@@aceapolonio7284lmao I know the one your talking about that's funny after 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yep,
@@aceapolonio7284Bro facts 😂😂
The concept of being voted out so quickly by your peers demonstrates the callous disregard of views that differ from your own.
This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.
That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.
Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result
Well said 🤔.
Well said
I hated the flags. It really disrupted the conversations.
Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .
The flags mostly kept the less intelligent arguments from continuing to actual point
80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.
The conservative one is night and day. Lol
I really hate the rush to the chair. I mean we have the technology to randomly select people. It's a one-line script command. Weird.
Today I learned that debates are 85% asking questions back and forth and only 15% answering each other's questions
Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.
Aww you watched the presidential debate I see
This is true for the liberal crowd. Charlie Kirk almost never get to finish his answer.
Also to just make ridiculous comparisons
Bc he always interrupts ppl.@@_w_w_
i don’t care what side you’re on, personal attacks and rude behavior will never do your argument any justice.
edit: yall need to heal fr
Spot on, sadly we award mediocrary in the form of humor and a lot of times this humor is deprivating.
Usually what the woke liberals do when they feel like they’re losing a debate
@@katc.johnson which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.
@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video
@@nicholassok5797always, every time.
Whoever didn’t talk over Charlie and be completely disrespectful got red flagged. These people are ridiculous
Charlie talked over EVERYONE
@@ghostwmost4938no he didn’t he was talking and got talked over and just kept talking very different
didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.
@@whisperissleepimgzzzparker
@@ghostwmost4938 It was mostly back and forth.
Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system
It's their own friends voting each other off, it's funny 🤣
It’s the only way they can feed the gen z entitlement 😂
@@British_Tanker. Its not a real discussion either. This is set up to be a lay up for that weirdo.
@@DBQ42 only loser would say 25 v 1 is set up for charlie.
@@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNORit literally is. Not only is this his specialty, but they all got taken out before they could rebuttal 🤷🏻♂️
Charlie Kirk: "Hello, nice to meet you."
Liberal: "Hel-"
*11/21 flags raised*
😂😂😂😂
Liberals 🙄
@@NoName-1239 it happened the same with you republicans and Dean... its annoying... everyone just wants to have their chance at the spotlight
@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views
@@angelusmortis3256 Libfart.
A debate between parker and Ben Shapiro would need to be played at .25 speed for anyone to be able to understand.
And zero valid points would be made on either end
I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂
@@nylens471 goodluck trying to get them to understand that...
Honestly the most well suited person to debate ben is probably some no name in highschool
@@taylortiwari7118yooo you can predict the future???? That's crazy bro
I would like to see the reverse of this as well, 25 conservative young people against 1 media ready liberal
As long as it's not parker.
Probably get that destiny guy to do it.
Destiny. That would be a perfect chaos.
Dani would be great
Honestly I’d like to see destiny do it
i feel so bad for the people that were having the debate RESPECTFULLY and KINDLY getting voted off so quickly. Doing personal attacks and insults doesnt do justice to your side.
So true, really well said 👍
I totally agree with you all the people that was trying to do respectfully got voted off quickly
They’ll turn on their own in a heartbeat, no pun intended…
Tell that to the "what if your daughter..." Chick.
The people who instantly got voted out were clueless though. Who cares if they are respectful? Its a game show about debating, not being nice to each other
why did that one girl even come into the argument without the proper knowledge of what a C SECTION is
fr tho
She didn't know the full term cesarean section, but she understood when he said c section
@@Hippyhop888her comment still stands. u come into a convo w bare minimum education and most the things she said get debunked w ease.
Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument
and these are the same people that can vote, smh
11 people vote for a new person, yet only 3 run for the chair. That says a lot.
sooo true!
Sadly yes
Facts
It does. And it's a shame. But more than anything, it shows that leadership isn't easy.
“Someone else go speak for me, I don’t know the lines for this one!”
Who gave Parker 2 monsters and a line of cocaine before this debate?
I don’t know, but I thank them for it.
Best RUclips comment I’ve ever seen
@@InvaderMedia420me too😭
Fr bro he just spitting out words😭😭
@@supdog12hi
The concept of rushing the chair is weird. Do it by random choice.
Yeah, that was a bit weird. Felt a little too aggressive for the type of video this is supposed to be.
Yep and then the person who gets to the chair first doesn’t know what they’re talking about or the convo goes nowhere like in the beginning with Naima
no. i like watching liberals try and exert energy. they don't do it often.
Why do they have others raise the flags for different speakers? Is it because they think the speaker sucks?
@@DrewTBG Bruh, the healthiest states are all liberal leaning ones you dork.
"My name is-"
*11 red flags, disqualified*
slim shady
😂😂
The flags go up as soon as their feelings get hurt. Just to stop the subject
Seriously who designed this show
@@Digger-NickI think it was liberals and the comment section is not going the way they thought it would 🤔
The red flags are great examples to show just how *quick* the students were to “kick” each other out, if they said something wrong.
Absolutely, lol. Not towing the line.
Not something “wrong” but different from their opinions. What happened to open minded individuals.
I noticed that too. Reflective of their society.
14% of the population should run over half of everything? thats not “inclusive” for the 86% ?
Remember the slaves were sacked and sold into slavery by other blacks (moors slave traders)
Why do they vote out the ones that are genuinely trying to debate but leave the ones who get emotional and just scream??
Because they are fighting against his views, whenever he creates a point that will affect the debate they vote the person out
They aren't there willing to listen
@@lezardvyexactly, I feel bad for these kids since they have no idea how much they’ve been brainwashed
Well i mean if u think about it most Liberals are just emotional fruit cakes by default 😂
IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ...
entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....
"I don't know what a c-section is". 11 flags immediately.
She never said she doesn't know what a c section is, she just didn't know the full term. Still a valid reason to vote her out.
@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life
@@misfitm1457That is just false
@@misfitm1457 So its bad to save the life of the mother and the child?
She didn't deserve that
why were people raising their flags so fast? this wasnt even a full discussion, people kept getting cut off
They wanted to end the conversation when it became clear their side was losing ground.
@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.
@@Jagged-Dust-Jacket Yeah it's not ideal. But it is an interesting idea and fun to watch.
Democrats 😂😂
Because if there was even remotely a hint of thinking differently than the mass thought, they wanted them gone
One of my favorite things on this planet, is when people think that laughing at someones argument suddenly makes them correct
Frrr
or laughing at information or words they dont know or understand to protect their ego and make the speaker look like the ignorant one
That's their last line of defense before their ego goes flat!
Urban basketball people do that. It’s astounding to witness. 🤓
It's childish.
These kids clapped for rude comments and voted off the respectful, kind people instantly
says alot...
Edit: The liberals proving my point in the comments is the icing on the cake
Wait but I thought all of them were “rude and woke”?
these people always eat their own
and the kind people had way better points and the arrogant people just sucked 😂
Typical liberals
I'm not completely through the video (I'm at 1:10:00) but the people who got voted off were usually just doing terribly
The first girl got voted out because she didn’t agree with abortion. I actually wanted to hear what she had to say
She got voted out becuase the liberals can’t bear to listen to an opinion that’s not theirs
I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.
@@OsirusIrdia So we dont want to hear peoples opinions???? If u hate freedom of speech that bad i suggest you go to North korea
@@MasterChief968yea exactly. They didn’t wanna hear eachother speak they just wanted to speak 😂
@@MasterChief968crazy world we live in
They kept voting out the speaker way too early on, at least let them try to make a point...
they had no arguments except attacking the person not the argument
yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off
@@MJ-mi9qc It's cause he was exactly parroting the current woke liberal thought process. Any deviation and it's bad.
@@MJ-mi9qc its because he said he agreed that abortion after 20 weeks or whatever shouldn't be legal.
Yeah it's really annoying. They should give them at least 1 minute and then after that time they can be voted out.
This is prime example of listening to respond rather than listening to learn…
On both sides.
@@sarahjkadlec4029 100 percent
Yes. I’m glad you commented this.
I dont think I have ever seen, on this scale, this type of the arrogance of ignorance in my life.
"I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING!"
i’d love an entire episode of this where its just charlie and dean for an hour and a half
no fr
Pls jubilee
Charlie - "hey mum can you venmo me 3,000 dollars so I can go out an extra night" how out of touch with society is this guy? 😊
@@ryanlee6920 obvious exaggeration
@@ryanlee6920its hyperbole you fool
This debate format sucks. The second you start getting a decent debate they vote the person out
It is awful which is why it is hilarious.
Agreed, it's literally so unproductive and horrible 😂
does this shows the real true of them. selfish.
The less woke people speak the better
Lefties don't like debates.
I found it extremely annoying that people trying to have an actual debate get voted out, but people like Parker get to talk the most
Parker is a big TT guy that does hours and hours of debate and makes bank. He's annoying AF.
@@Skirraq um no wtf i thought parker was great ?
@@makananigraceof course you did, talking fast and with dialect doesn’t equate to making strong points….
@@makananigraceI’ve seen Parker’s debates on TikTok’s and I was really excited, but he was the only one who actually really annoyed me I’m ngl
@@makananigrace😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 No. No.
everybody raising their flags on that one girl who barely had 2 mins to talk, they literally are so rude
time stamp?
@@kairavideshpande6508 I got you: 8:39
I checked the amount of time, she had 44 seconds to talk
Because she sucked
I mean, she didn’t even know what a cesarean section is lol
The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.
He was being too polite and wasn't yelling insults, which showed the group that he wasn't a woke individual
They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.
Definitely polite, knowledgeable, and wrong lol
True, but its still pre conception
Almost seems like they voted him off to make Kirk stop talking lmfao.
Noticed that anyone that remotely agreed with Charlie instantly got red flags?
They're just children trying to aggravate the adult.
Communism loves censorship
Charlie is Zionist lol
I wonder why 😑
Yeah because all this kids are not smart and can’t think for themselves. They just listen to their professors.
This is actually painful to watch. When someone actually has a valid point red flags pop up.
i think it's refreshing... to realize that you aren't off as bad as some of us
I know huh , even more painful to think how much their parents paid for their indoctrination
which ones had a valid point in your opinion..?
@@Sweep-u5k that’s what I was trying to figure out
This is evidence that the world is approaching the point of no return
The rushing to the chair is so ridiculous..
yes especially since some are sitting on the back wont make it as fast as people who are sitting in front of him
fr
thats part of his tactic of putting them off their game.
@@slapshotLC thats cope and an excuse
Yeah they could’ve easily had a random name ballot
I love that dean accidentally says unaliving like he’s on tiktok live 😭😭
LMAOO you can take the boy out of tiktok but you cant take tiktok out of the boy 😭😭
I NOTICED THAT OMGGG LMFAOOOO
And when Parker said P3dos 💀😭
But you got it, what does this matter?
@@aiba6540 I didn't get it. What's unaliving?
It’s crazy how 25 people who share the same opinion, struggle to share the same opinion.
People can agree with a topic and desagree with other topic, it would be the same if as 25 conservatives
Being in one political party does not make you agree with every single point of that party
It’s crazy how wtvr u commented here doesn’t make sense at all
@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party
that’s not crazy… that’s called being an individual, everyone isnt just a carbon copy of eachother.
That one dude who just couldn’t stop bringing up religion when it had nothing to do with the subject was annoying. He’d make a terrible lawyer.
He didnt want a dialogue he wanted a monologue.
@@shinineagle23 parker sucks
I want to ask him what "Christian" cult he grew up in. Nobody has that much animosity for something without it being personal.
Agreed
It rlly was so annoying. He hates Christianity so much he can’t even stay on the actual topic.
voting someone out because they aren't interrupting is insane
That is what they are taught to do.
It’s a debate!
I belief it’s so solidify they’re opinion on the matter, what he was says challenges their own perspective on an issue in a way they didn’t like, same way when your ego is challenged and you try to orientate your personal opinion of self back to it’s original position
I find this funny after just watching the vise versa video and seeing someone give their whole debate time just to let the liberal student speak
@@eric.1948Watch the new vice versa video this one individual literally had to use all his time just to let the one liberal student speak
I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.
You'd have to track so many people and trust that they wouldn't screw the rules over. It wouldn't be efficient.
@@benjaminmedrano4493 have one person per person for tracking
That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.
@@GrowMasterGeneral I didn't really care for the rush to the chair. That's not really what debate is about. Interesting, but inconsequential.
If it were the other way round the conservatives wouldn't do that.
As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework
Me too bruh. The arguments are BONKERS, the premise BONKERS
Wokism at its finest, stop discussing points when they are no longer relevant to what you feel.
Independent aka republican 😂
i would argue that there were many valid points. mostly from the krik side but also from the liberal side.
@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.
These kids didn't want a new speaker, they just wanted to shut Charlie up.
noticed that aswell. when they don't agree with the point he's slowly making, they will try to stop him and refresh the debate
I don’t even like him but I agree😭😭😭
Yep. It's childish. They came into this seething with resentment, you can see it on their faces and in their behavior. They don't care about any of these points, they just wanted a chance to tear him apart.
Kids... that was being generous. Some of them were Toddlers.
Rightfully so. That monstrosity shouldnt be given a platform
That girl attacks his kids and then says she’s a psychology major 😂😂
for personal attack you don't need a degree . you just need your evil side
I like her. We need more people like her to make people understand the reality of abortion.
@ripsanskrit3609 😂the crazies coming out to defend the crazies.
@@ripsanskrit3609she didn’t say anything intelligent and she got owned😂😂😂
All the nuts do Psychology, I noticed at Uni.
Don’t rush the chair. Just make the circle smaller and give everyone three minutes.
Thank you this was weird to watch
But rushing the chair is part of what creates the high-pressure atmosphere and makes this fun. If you want an ordinary debate, there are plenty of those.
Buzzers!
I made a suggestion in the comments that maybe flags can't go up until the first 60-90 seconds of a new debate.
Charlie already does that on his own channel and the results are shockingly similar
bruh why are they waiving the flags for great arguments like wtf
What are the flags suppose to mean
Cause people don't wanna hear the truth
I think part of it is because they can answer the question better. And/or they just want to be heard
@@AlphaSporeGamingit means they are voting to switch the person out of the chair
@@nahyouremad correct but for example I feel like at this part 7:48 they raised the flags just to shut him up.
The red flags really disrupted any actual conversation
We learned alot from their behavior though
that's how woke people do
That's the point.
I liked that it kept both sides from rambling too bad
They don't want actual conversations because they know they have no valid arguments to stand on, that's why they always hate on people like charlie and try to shut him down at all cost simply for having open debates where both sides can discuss things. They only want echo chambers where they can push the narratives, not actual conversations with dissenting opinions.
“A table can’t identify as a woman”
2 flags go up
😂😂
In French, objects have genders. Funny thing is....a table IS a woman in French... une table
literally!!!
@@BrainDeadPupin German it’s Male „der Tisch“
@@elisabellaaaa Cool!
This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?
Most people talk to speak and be heard and too few people listen and respond.
@@alexrice1870Conversations are not one directional. Just because someone is speaking doesn't mean that you're only supposed to listen and respond.
That kid just wanted to think he was smarter 🤡
sadly that's how 'debates' work nowadays
Fr
Parker’s obsession with Christianity was ultimately his downfall. Completely avoided the main topic
He was there to get content for his TikTok not to debate. It's all about "gotcha" moments and not intelligent discourse
Parker = beta
The moment he defined what a woman is was the moment that he was yapping more than Charlie
yeah, questions was about women and he keeps bring up Charlie's faith.
Typical lost kid. 😂
I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately.
We definitely live in a society, my friends
That's the first thing I knew how this would go when they didn't let her get past "I'm Catholic"
Great debates from everyone but the tall girl who looks like offspring from Alien Romulus, Destiny, and a literal demon.
Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees
I thought that was crazy too.
She was going about her argument rationally. Soon as religion is mentioned, she’s out.
they all wanted to see a dunk from their tribe...thats what our conversations are being reduced to
It's difficult to win a debate against a smart person. it's impossible to win a debate against an ignorant person.
Its like humans keep getting dumber each year. This is why i stay far away from them.
It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question.
The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.
@@ESquaredSolutions Respectful? They insulted him constantly lol
@@j.t.8685 I dont think so
@@ESquaredSolutions hahaha 'respectful' they sounded like a bunch of reddtors
just because someone is interrupting , talking louder and faster doesn't mean they are winning the argument lol
Come on now, don't ruin their whole plan.
Also if you’re actually winning the debate you don’t have to constantly say you’re winning the debate 😂😂😂
so what Charlie Kirk does all the time?
Fr so annoying
@@kayla9973shut up I’m speaking
"that was actually the best point somebody made"
true show of professionalism from both
They gave him his own episode! Watching it next 😂
@@minacarlson1137 I just watched it
I like how CK gives credit were it's due
Rude behavior is a clear sign of weak argument and you loose automatically.
boo hoo
@@turbotaro3714you’re one of the people he’s talking about sad to see
@@turbotaro3714lol proving his point
@@turbotaro3714proving his point is crazy lil bro
@@tei_the_boy2367 you just used an insult. Because of this you have a weak argument and have thus lost. I’ll take my medal by mail.
im 9 minutes in and i cant get passed dean getting voted out for a girl who doesn't know what a c-section is like girl what are you doing there
*past
These kids seem to lack alot of basic knowledge and can barely argue simple concepts. It's really worrying that these people may have positions of power in the future.
Like kamala??? @@peterfyal4998
Oh? For her age it would make sense she doesn't know what a cesarean is regarding the diff ways to give birth. Now what doesn't make sense, is his argument bringing up cesareans. Like at all. I can't get over that. Those don't correlate.
Are you slow? He brought up c-sections to counter the claims made from people of pro choice that getting an abortion saves the mothers life that would have died if trying to give birth. He brought up c-section to prove the mothers life can sill be saved and give birth through c-section. So his claim was that abortion is not needed to save the mothers life if she might have complications giving birth@TheShalibug
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
She’s giving “Kamala” lol
hilarious
No I’m speaking
Insufferable
Cringe fest with her
I don’t think they ever figured out that they aren’t voting out Charlie
I thought the same thing...
Hahahahahahahahahaha omg that thought made this video even 1000× better haha
This is the best comment I've seen in a long time LOL
I don’t usually say this but this is genuinely a hilarious comment wtf💀💀💀💀
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I’m glad that no one was speaking with only emotion and there was minimum interruption
Lmao
😂😂😂
Women always get emotional when talking about abortion because it can directly effect their life.
I get that. But it's always a bad look when you can't control your emotions. I say for abortions let liberal men debate, if you can't control yourself.
@@berkay6947 women can't control their emotions a majority of the time especially when you talk about topics like abortion, dating age gap, etc. They have the inability to seperate the issue from taking it personal.
@@sirij8784 Those women really shouldn't be called women, more like girls. There are females out there that are cool calm and collected (experienced, most likely, because they have to be that way for the stability of their children who don't have the capability to control their emotions).
I have debates with many men, my husband actually brings his friends and family to debate with me lol. People from my generation (Gen Z) are more likely to have these kinds of debates than those of older generations. I've seen many older women like Kristan Hawkins do wonderfully during debates. Amala Ekpunobi is a great female debater who is Gen Z, I recommend you check her out.
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
No, I'm speaking 🗣️
Sperg
Wanna say it one more time?
@@hypershadic4697No... I'm speaking.
@@reflectcard6258 she thought was an entitled brat.
She is insufferable, imagine being married to her
I'd like to see 1 liberal vs. 25 conservatives
lol
It would be a fire squad 😂
It would never happen because they could never handle it.
@@kinleyschaffer4679 true - also I don’t think they would need 25 and I can’t imagine flags would be thrown up.
@@kinleyschaffer4679they could DEFINITELY not handle it. They can dish it out though lol.
Idk about anyone else, but who was also completely mentally exhausted after trying to watch this!??
The ones that actually are worth listening to last less than a minute while the ones not worth it last longer
Why is it college students who are still too naive to make an argument debating, while the conservatives give a variety of people?
Same I’ve lost faith in these people. Just let nature take it course
I'm 52:00 minutes in, help me😂😂😂
I guess it's the stampede of the lem mings to expose their id iocy while selling out their supposed values like the "cat holic" who said not to judge
I would honestly like to see a Democrat do this with 20 Republican students
I completely agree😅💯
They would just cry and scream 😂
YES
@@ambivertical they wouldn’t have a chance they’d breakdown and leave
@@tyson4044 for the most part destiny is the only one that could do it and not get completely destroyed
I love how people start putting up their flags when the person starts agreeing with Charlie
It’s because they struggle in a debate setting, not because they agree
@@apexnp It's because they are learning in real time that their opinions are incorrect
It’s cause they are hearing things they don’t like
And the person arguing on their behalf is losing the arguement
@ultraprogamerprogamer8090 yes! I've noticed that, once Charlie starts making great points/saying tough things that are hard to hear, they put the flags up & want it to end. Hilarious. Can't handle the opinions of others & further proves they want people to coddle/baby them, even if that means lie...than to hear the truth, even if it hurts.
@@SeverianofNessus nah its because half of these kids haven't actually formed proper opinions on these topics, while charlie's job is literally to formulate and distribute conservative opinions. its not that their opinions were 'wrong' just mostly taken from other sources, without the logical backing where the opinions actually originated.
Personal attacks, rambling, and injections have no place in a discussion
Especially that girl who talk about Charlie's daughter
That's a complete psychopatic, child abusing hysterical person @@alvinlin9503
"know-it-alls" who know nothing.,...naive & "wet behind the ears".
@@alvinlin9503evil women she is..
Rushing to a chair and instantaneously getting voted out also have no place in discussion
Charlie : college is a scam
Parker : why can birds fly when we can’t?
LMAO⁉️⁉️
@@lizanya6433watch the video and you wouldn’t be like the people in it.
😂😂
@@lizanya6433 Parker had no points - Claiming he is a debater whilst talking over the opposing member and constantly changing the point of debate, then not letting the other member answer is not debating, it's Mas-debating eg: being a wanker and a jumped up little one at that.
@@lizanya6433 the topic was "is college a scam" and parker kept attacking christian views and how its a "scam" INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT COLLEGE
The dude who kept bringing up religion into the most irrelevant debates because he has a vendetta 💀
I'd wager his parents are conservative and religious.
and he'll never win
parker got him on every single one and it had nothing to do with with being religious it's because chuck is a heretic trying to spin God's message to his will
Gosh he annoys the crap out of me. I wish they would have always flagged him. Dk how people think he can debate.
Kept on thinking that he is winning Charlie at the debate but he was just ignoring everything he said. Can win any debate if you are the only person in the room 🤭
Charlie: College is a scam
Parker: Church is a scam
You can believe Church is a scam, but that’s not an argument for college not being a scam.
Exactly what I was thinking. He can use that as an argument later, but it has nothing to do with the original argument.
also there arent much church force you to pay to attend, and you can always go to other church, college need to pay college fund
Also, the LDS church isn’t even true Christianity, they are a cult.
He's trying to poke holes in Charlie's logic being applied inconsistently, ie his argument is predicated on ideology instead of a objective view of the facts. It seems strange but it can be pretty effective against people like Charlie who are massive hypocrites and have very shallow reasoning for the positions they hold.
@@netron66no one is forced to go to college either
Can we please put Parker and Ben Shapiro head-to-head? We’d have to slow down the video to 50% speed.
I really want to see that debate
I could never watch that they’re both completely bad faith and insufferable.
😂😂😂
Parker is on tik tok busy cutting off any caller winning their argument while he is raking in the donations from gullible woke libs .
That’s something we need to see
The red flags made me so mad because they weren’t even contributing
They are used to just watching it all on tv that’s why
Yea they didn’t even let Lily speak even if she didn’t know what she was talking about
And sitting there thinking they're smart and know better. LOSERS. 😊
I think everyone should have had an iq test before the show and they show it while they speak
Welcome to everyone who voted Democrat
This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.
It was pretty wild how emotionally unhinged these kids are...and I'm just 5 minutes in 😂
@@DChris3 It gets worse.
Charlie called the guy Impotent how is that not a personal attack?
He called the argument impotent...that is a different meaning@@ozzier9483
@@DChris3for real. That one girl was throwing so much of a fit that she may as well just laid on the floor and started kicking her feet.
The moment someone makes a personal attack/insults you've already lost the argument.
I couldn't agree more
lack of intelligence fr
I couldn't dissagree more. attacks and insults are done by intelligent people.
@@mrk1224rage bait 👍
@@mrk1224insult are a sign of low IQ, especially in a debate
i love how they let the most loud interrumpting and ignoring the point person the most time, and vote out the only guy who gave arguments in less than 2 mins
Cough Parker Cough.
Goes to show how flawed democracy is
Weak minded libs
the effects if rittalin are real.
Parker the punk 😂😂
Remaining this calm while talking to Parker is very impressive.
Literallyyyyyy
Especially with his creepy ahh smile 😭😭😭😭
True. I would probably get really irritated if I was getting shredded the way Kirk was while debating Parker.
@drexeldragon1723 ...except Parker never presented a single valid argument and failed on every level to debate any of the topics. Charlie schooled the sh out of him lol
Parker is a typical pigeon... cant play chess, but great at defecating all over the board.
Charlie: Lets talk about Lunch
Parker: Lets talk about dinner.
😂😂
Charlie Parker: 🎷
Parker gotta be the most annoying person there and thats really saying something
he was the most annoying person, I was cringing the each he opened his mouth
He’s brutal
“Tell me you’ve never been punched in the face without telling me you’ve never been punched in the face”
“I’m speaking , I’m speaking , I’m speaking” ok, I’m punching!
@@getbendt2970 Yeah, and even if you're a born male you'll still be ok so long as you identify as something non-male.
@@getbendt2970he kept interrupting her so uh yeah she deserves to speak
@@Yuhh11203she interrupted him.
@@Yuhh11203he was interrupted a lot more by those weirdos than he did to them
When you start making personal attacks, it’s a sign you lost the debate as well as your damn mind.
"When a debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
and that one was a" psicologist " lol
👏@@JustinTime4Memes
I don't care for Kirk but anyone that thinks Parker did anything other than be an insufferable pseudo-intellectual is the problem with society.
yes 👍
Yup, was thinking the same thing when he had his turn lol
His tactic was to ask a question and then talk over you while you answer and moving 2 ideas forward. Then claiming you didnt answer his question.
Yea, this should be top comment lol. Parker is the worst type or person to engage in conversation with. Knowledgeable, but unable to have honest dialogue due to his inflated ego and desire to feel like he “won” the argument in any way possible.
Yall uncs couldn’t do any better
It's not about winning or losing, it's about understanding eachother. Without judging and interrupting. I guess people will never learn and like to see drama.
Bingo!
how are you gonna understand and not judge someone who’s opinion is on the total opposite side of the spectrum?
tiktok generation and indoctrinated by woke institutions curbing critical thought.
@@ju3334.We all judge. I guess they meant judge as in irrelevant and unnecessary insults.
Charlie's main point is that these little kids who are lied to by society think they know better
I like how the girl scoffed when he said plumbing, electrician. Those trades payout big time and dont end up in debt
My brother is a plumber and while they do eventually, apprenticeships are still like three years then you have deal with the newly qualified pay. So I could only assume she scoffed because the time spent trying to earn that so called big payout, probably takes longer than obtaining your degree and finding a job.
I think the trades can payout big time but how often are people in the trades working massive amounts of overtime to reach these big payouts?
@@djanga6550yea but the thing that most people don’t realize is that once you learn the skill, learning the marketing to get your own customers isn’t to difficult. You can then start your own business and make upwards of 1,000$ a day.
Sometimes they do, most of the time they don’t
You scoff but girl those plumbers, electricians, framers, etc are the ones who built the place you live in. Who built the place you work at etc.
Imagine entering an abortion debate, as a woman, and not knowing what a c-section is 🤣
He didn't give a chance to speak in time for her, and do people realise this is literal 1 hour rage bait ?
Debates should not be rushed.
@@Stardvst-u6jYou need hooked on phonics 😑
She probably didn't know what the c stood for. After he said c-section it seems like she understood.
CHARLIE is the one who claimed sex education is “better” now. Clearly it’s not
imagine thinking a c-section is the go-to alternative for delivery complications
Parker: “You didn’t answer my question.”
Also Parker: Immediately cuts him off when he tries to answer the question and asks 4 more questions.
And how many times did Charlie do that other people? Yep. He just trying to bully college students because he is too uneducated to handle a true debate. There was several students who walked over him.
Kirk did answer all of his questions, even when Parker said he didnt...
Listening to this kid boils my blood. He does not listen at all
He thought he could talk over him like he does to guests on his lives and it didn't work.
He obviously has an agenda against Christianity. He brought it up each time and clearly had no open mind to what Kirk had to say.
That guy who talkes way too fast and over the other person is completely insufferable.
"No I'm speaking" chick was also insufferable
@@fortheloveofdavis9577You mean ‘Temu Alanis Morrissette’?
He wants to make a point beyond ur point
@@ripsanskrit3609 That wasn’t a comment…
You should hear blue shirt debates does the same projecter
Talking fast in a debate doesnt show confidence, it shows insecurity and nervousness
Doesn’t matter if what you’re saying is correct. How about you attack the substance of the argument instead of characteristics regarding how the person speaks.
Exactly… I had to turn on subtitles because I couldn’t catch up with what Parker was saying 😂😭
He took his monthly adderall dose that morning.
Only argument to that is that everyone only had a very limited amount of time to talk and everyone was getting voted off quickly so you had to talk fast to get your point out. But I do agree with what you said
Ben Shapiro: Uh Huh