That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate
You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate
They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”
The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative
It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !
That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.
This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!
@@katcelestia which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.
@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video
it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid
i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.
The comments of one woman in this video don’t necessarily reflect the entire “side” you’re referring to, other people in the room like dean are incredibly respectful. Also, just based on the viewpoints posited in these comments, the more conservative side isn’t very accepting of those who support abortion.
In order to give acceptance you have to get acceptance. Where did Charlie claim to accept others? When he argued to strip people of their rights and healthcare? Please google the 'paradox of tolerance.' You cannot be tolerant of intolerance.
@@ookamihime5122 these young people are such brats they resort to mean comments. That’s why no one listens and respects them. If his 10 yo daughter got pregnant he would not deny her healthy care, that’s not what he said. Such immature people.
@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.
I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth. Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too. I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).
Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.
Parker would lose big time in a real debate when everyone gets the same amount of minutes and pressure talking gets you nowhere. Maren was not even debating. She was venting her anger by making nasty personal attack.
@@jobcervantes2904 do you not agree? Do you think it’s morally okay to force a CHILD to give birth because somebody thought they were an easy target? Oml
There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.
Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis. Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.
Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.
But they are rushing because they know they have limited time and want all their points spread out before they get voted out, which they know will happen. Although I do agree they could use more insight as to when to talk and when to hold back and let their "opponent," the person they are debating with, get to say speak.
Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.
you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior
Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system
@16:09 Yes, Parker. That is what a red herring is. A Red Herring is a fact or piece of information that is used to distract from the main issue due to it's relevance.
Fr, like I love that he brings up religion to the conversations since I’m also very passionate abt that but that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the debate topic 😭😭
I believe he brought I up as it links to the point (Charlie's point) he was using it to show the correlation in his idea that Charlie said "a scam is misleading someone" so parker was using some people being misled by religion to try make Charlie see his double standars in logic :) g@@Ilikelizards-r1o
@@queenofhearts6584 they kids applauding during an debate that is in a structured forum are the reason our elected officials and candidates can’t have real debates. So immature. You don’t clap and snap and make sounds during an actual debate. It’s not a sporting event.
Not neccessarily, sometimes you need to interrupt because they built an argument on a fallacy that has to be corrected before they build up (You can see this a lot where Matt Dillahunty lets them rant for 10 minutes when he was in the Atheist Experience). Sometimes they drift from the main point and what they are saying adds nothing to it. But in this case in particular, yes, the kid was annoying, and drifted from the topic.
It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked
Charlie Kirk deserves all the respect for being so calm and composed through out this heated debate w these woke kids who are here just to speak their opinion but never once listened to what the other person is saying.
IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ... entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....
This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.
That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.
Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result
@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.
Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.
didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.
Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.
I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂
FROM THE RlVER TO THE SEE!!! 🩸🩸 I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.
yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off
Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .
80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.
The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.
They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.
Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument
Why is parker just attacking his religion and completely ignoring the main topic in every single instance he gets n the chair, not once but 3 times he changed the subject to attack charlies religion instead of addressing the topic
Because he wants to get Charlie pissed off to get him to say something out of pocket. I’ll give Parker this, he’s a smart kid yet very unwise and condescending.
Because he’s a worm that’s never been punched in his face or been in any other conflict beyond words. He’s the kind of person push someone to physicality, then call the cops once he’s knocked out
@@josephfouche2006 Exactly, if you're going to base your root knowledge on 'religious science' it's already flawed as it requires 'belief' without proof, the biggest argument ever.
It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question. The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.
Parker is really smart and knows how to show empathy for the minorities, things that a lot of christians doesn't seem able to do. I don't see why you guys think you're above him and are "praying" for him when you could learn things from him.
@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views
This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?
As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework
@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.
This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.
I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately. We definitely live in a society, my friends
Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees
I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.
That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.
I love how you’re mad at the girl who made that comment but you’re completely fine with Charlie Kirk claiming “the baby would be delivered” when a child victim of SA is forced to give birth to another child. And you wanna talk about immaturity?
He's trying to poke holes in Charlie's logic being applied inconsistently, ie his argument is predicated on ideology instead of a objective view of the facts. It seems strange but it can be pretty effective against people like Charlie who are massive hypocrites and have very shallow reasoning for the positions they hold.
People also still need to remember that social media has made people get way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it
But rushing the chair is part of what creates the high-pressure atmosphere and makes this fun. If you want an ordinary debate, there are plenty of those.
@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life
@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party
@ultraprogamerprogamer8090 yes! I've noticed that, once Charlie starts making great points/saying tough things that are hard to hear, they put the flags up & want it to end. Hilarious. Can't handle the opinions of others & further proves they want people to coddle/baby them, even if that means lie...than to hear the truth, even if it hurts.
@@SeverianofNessus nah its because half of these kids haven't actually formed proper opinions on these topics, while charlie's job is literally to formulate and distribute conservative opinions. its not that their opinions were 'wrong' just mostly taken from other sources, without the logical backing where the opinions actually originated.
Women always get emotional when talking about abortion because it can directly effect their life. I get that. But it's always a bad look when you can't control your emotions. I say for abortions let liberal men debate, if you can't control yourself.
@@berkay6947 women can't control their emotions a majority of the time especially when you talk about topics like abortion, dating age gap, etc. They have the inability to seperate the issue from taking it personal.
@@sirij8784 Those women really shouldn't be called women, more like girls. There are females out there that are cool calm and collected (experienced, most likely, because they have to be that way for the stability of their children who don't have the capability to control their emotions). I have debates with many men, my husband actually brings his friends and family to debate with me lol. People from my generation (Gen Z) are more likely to have these kinds of debates than those of older generations. I've seen many older women like Kristan Hawkins do wonderfully during debates. Amala Ekpunobi is a great female debater who is Gen Z, I recommend you check her out.
Parker must be on Aderall. He looks like he hardly ever sleeps. All of these irrelevant, rapid-fire questions are extremely annoying. He'll probably become a schizophrenic if he keeps up this life style. I wouldn't be surprised if he already has OCD.
simple absense of knowing what respect is and how to build up a constructive dialogue, such people always talk fast, interrupt and swap topics every second in attempt to overload their opponent with different useless information
Want more? Subscribe👆
do a part two with different liberals this was entertaining asf
Just did 🎤
subbed
charlie kirk vs feminists
Charlie Kirk vs Dean Withers
The fact they applaud the most ignorant ones and vote out the ones actually trying to have a debate is insane
That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate
You're dealing with a death cult. There is no rationality when you are dealing with narcissistic cultists.
Should have guaranteed 1-2 mins to talk
You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate
They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”
The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative
exactly. our minds are made up, we only want validation.
It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !
For real, didn’t even let some people finish their points.
true.
That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.
Just because you don’t let someone talk, doesn’t mean you’re winning a debate.
That's exactly what im saying
This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!
reall
The guy who I will refer to as "Mr.Unbearable" should see this comment
Agreed.
Why do they think being rude supports their points
@@cakes.magick they think they are entitled to disrespect. I certainly hope they are enjoying the election results.
When
@@junefousek3644did you not watch the video?
Because they're still children mentally.
Because they hate something about him...do you know what that is ?
i don’t care what side you’re on, personal attacks and rude behavior will never do your argument any justice.
edit: yall need to heal fr
Spot on, sadly we award mediocrary in the form of humor and a lot of times this humor is deprivating.
Usually what the woke liberals do when they feel like they’re losing a debate
@@katcelestia which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.
@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video
@@nicholassok5797always, every time.
what really made me mad is when someone was willing to have a respectful debate and convo they’d vote them out
It's the Liberal way!
it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid
Describes the democratic party perfectly...
No I'm speaking no I'm speaking no I'm speaking
@@ironlordflash4346That is an American Liberal problem. Non American Liberals are commonly NOT like this
As soon as a real conversation starts, the red flags come out.
The real question is America getting taken advantage of to the tune of trillions by Israel.
that sh1tty guy with glasses LOL, hes so annoying.
i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.
Pretty much all working together trying to make him look bad. It didn't work. 😂
Shows you the amount of intelligence in the room...
Remember everyone, this is the side of “love” and “kindness” and “acceptance”. And yet she said that about his child. Absolutely disgusting.
💯💯‼️
The comments of one woman in this video don’t necessarily reflect the entire “side” you’re referring to, other people in the room like dean are incredibly respectful. Also, just based on the viewpoints posited in these comments, the more conservative side isn’t very accepting of those who support abortion.
In order to give acceptance you have to get acceptance. Where did Charlie claim to accept others? When he argued to strip people of their rights and healthcare? Please google the 'paradox of tolerance.' You cannot be tolerant of intolerance.
@@danyonvial843 I see it often with democrats, when they feel like they are losing, they start being disrespectful to make themselves feel better
@@ookamihime5122 these young people are such brats they resort to mean comments. That’s why no one listens and respects them. If his 10 yo daughter got pregnant he would not deny her healthy care, that’s not what he said. Such immature people.
The ones who actually knew how to debate were voted out when the real conversations started 😂
It's not that they were voted out specifically, it's that these people were riled up as well and really wanted to sit on the chair themselves.
@@aceman0000099I get what you mean but normally the first few people that raised their flags never went to the chair 😭
@@Madison.13yr maybe they were undercover conservatives
It's called leftism
Of course. They were all taught by woke professors, who scream, cry and become violent when proven wrong, just like a toddler.
I like how the ppl who were respectful and nice got voted off in like a min, just tells u the type of ppl in that room
To add, they only cheered for emotional behavior lmao
> Talk over charlie: cheer
> Rude comment: cheer
> Speak emotionally: cheer
@@random-eh2lv Yup, that "what if your daughter" girl smh
@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.
This is why Shorts and Tiktok is the main source of news for this generation.
I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth.
Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too.
I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).
The people who kept raising their flags and never actually debated are making me mad
I was literally thinking the same thing
LITERALLY OMFG IT'S PISSING ME OFF SSOOOOOOO BAD
Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.
@@MatthewMM414 This comment clearly made you react a certain way. Why would you react and leave a comment? Everyone are NPCs in our lives
ikr
Parker would lose big time in a real debate when everyone gets the same amount of minutes and pressure talking gets you nowhere. Maren was not even debating. She was venting her anger by making nasty personal attack.
I don’t blame her tbh the guy was saying he would’ve forced his daughter to have her rapists child
What was her attack?
@@junefousek3644Saying she hopes his daughter gets away from him
@@jobcervantes2904 do you not agree? Do you think it’s morally okay to force a CHILD to give birth because somebody thought they were an easy target? Oml
If you're not angry enough or condescending enough, the group votes you out. lol.
Yep. They vote out the people having an actual debate/conversation, but keep parker who is annoying loud, arrogant, fast loud talking.
They’ll literally start clapping and laughing if you throw insults at him
There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.
Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis.
Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.
Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.
The idiots voting out the people actually making valid points is so irritating omgggg
Your team 😂
Omg Fr and most of them weren’t even participating in the debate
there was not a single valid point of them
That is how the world works, that why we are here !
realest
11 people vote for a new person, yet only 3 run for the chair. That says a lot.
sooo true!
Sadly yes
Facts
It does. And it's a shame. But more than anything, it shows that leadership isn't easy.
“Someone else go speak for me, I don’t know the lines for this one!”
“I want to hear your points, I’m talking too much” Words none of the students have ever considered in their lives
But they are rushing because they know they have limited time and want all their points spread out before they get voted out, which they know will happen. Although I do agree they could use more insight as to when to talk and when to hold back and let their "opponent," the person they are debating with, get to say speak.
@rens3675 I said “in their lives”.
lol
WHY ARE THEY PULLING THEIR FLAGS OUT WHEN THE CONVERSATION IS LITERALLY SO REAL
Because they don’t like hearing the facts. It hurts their feelings 😢
@@athenabbb True that!
Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.
Because he´s speaking the truth. That means "he´s winning". They can´t have that...
They are scared of the truth. That's all.
you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior
typical liberal behavior
All cowards
FR BRUH it pisses me off bc literally wtf
That’s what most liberals/ Wokes are brother it’s really sad…
His face Pisses me off
Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system
It's their own friends voting each other off, it's funny 🤣
It’s the only way they can feed the gen z entitlement 😂
@@British_Tanker. Its not a real discussion either. This is set up to be a lay up for that weirdo.
@@DBQ42 only a loser would say 25 v 1 is set up for charlie.
@@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNORit literally is. Not only is this his specialty, but they all got taken out before they could rebuttal 🤷🏻♂️
@16:09 Yes, Parker. That is what a red herring is. A Red Herring is a fact or piece of information that is used to distract from the main issue due to it's relevance.
Fr, like I love that he brings up religion to the conversations since I’m also very passionate abt that but that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the debate topic 😭😭
I believe he brought I up as it links to the point (Charlie's point) he was using it to show the correlation in his idea that Charlie said "a scam is misleading someone" so parker was using some people being misled by religion to try make Charlie see his double standars in logic :) g@@Ilikelizards-r1o
They should change it up. The first time that a personal attack is used, you're automatically disqualified.
I would love to see that one the conversation would be shut down even quicker than they already are
upvote
I love that, wish we’d do that IRL
None of them would ever be able to speak.
Agreed
First girl: I’m a catholic
Everyone: 🚩🚩🚩🚩
Yeah that was ridiculous, the moment you have a slightly different view, 🚩🚩🚩? Like you aren’t letting her debate in any sense…
Yup being Catholic and a liberal is a an oxymoron.. She will have to chose soon
@@MrMonchis04why?
@@MrMonchis04lmao. Wait until you learn human history.
Edit: sorry, meant to say American history. My b
@@MrMonchis04 She's a wanna be catholic. Only applies what she likes and forgets what she doesn't.
*respectful debate begins*
Students:🚩🚩🚩🚩
*nasty debate ends*
Students: 🙌🏻👏🏻
yeah yeah , this is soooo sillyyyy
*"you are nasty" *
Students: 🤝🤝🤝
Whole lotta potato brained people in that room
Not only clapping hands, but stupidly snapping fingers??😂😂😂😂
Those kids are whack
Parker thinks he’s cooking but the only thing that was cooked is his fried brain
Because he’s articulated and speaking fast they think he whippin a meal It’s really making the cells out my brain flutter away😭😭
lmao well said
Dude is so angry
Deep fried!
@@queenofhearts6584 they kids applauding during an debate that is in a structured forum are the reason our elected officials and candidates can’t have real debates. So immature. You don’t clap and snap and make sounds during an actual debate. It’s not a sporting event.
I would like to see the reverse of this as well, 25 conservative young people against 1 media ready liberal
As long as it's not parker.
Probably get that destiny guy to do it.
Destiny. That would be a perfect chaos.
Dani would be great
Honestly I’d like to see destiny do it
Words per minute is NOT a measure of intelligence, and interrupting surely is a sign of intolerance.
💯
Not neccessarily, sometimes you need to interrupt because they built an argument on a fallacy that has to be corrected before they build up (You can see this a lot where Matt Dillahunty lets them rant for 10 minutes when he was in the Atheist Experience).
Sometimes they drift from the main point and what they are saying adds nothing to it.
But in this case in particular, yes, the kid was annoying, and drifted from the topic.
@Alientcp not really you can debunk their point after they are finished.
Kamala
intolerance? I don't think you know what that means lol
People should have immunity of not being voted out for at least a minute, it would improve the format
🌝
I like that but I think most were in there for a min or 2 but we onky got clips here and there
A-frikkin-men
It was edited for brevity
It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked
Parker is one annoying ahh kid 💀
I’m not liking the fact that literally anytime an individual is trying to debate RESPECTFULLY, they vote them out.
I saw that to. Hurting themselves & blind to their chains.
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(事實上就是，共和黨比較有人類道德觀，以人為本；民主黨比較沒有人類道德觀，不以人為本！)
"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！
(美國民主黨執政更惨，已經成為無法控制的大怪獸了！)
例如：同性婚，廢死刑，邪淫(才有墮胎)，殺生，偷盜，妄言，綺語，兩舌，惡口，吸毒，搶劫，干涉各國内政，製造更多仇恨。(美國一年大約一千名警察死於槍下！)
佛陀大覺者預言，人類會越來越沒有道德心，放縱私欲的結果，就是世界越沈淪！
中國人從古至今，受到聖賢的教導，保有一定的禮儀，善良。(只有少數個案，整體上還是好的。)
❤😊😊😊😊😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊@@mechellestriler4079
Especially when they just didn’t like what Charlie was saying
Yea because that’s how they are if you do not believe are agree with them they do not want to hear it.
The black guy never spoke but the camera keeps panning to him whenever the topic is on black people😂😂😂
HAHAHAHA
I remember that Key & Peele skit where the camera guy shows Jordan everytime Key mentioned gay lmao
@@aceapolonio7284lmao I know the one your talking about that's funny after 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yep,
@@aceapolonio7284Bro facts 😂😂
Who gave Parker 2 monsters and a line of cocaine before this debate?
I don’t know, but I thank them for it.
Best RUclips comment I’ve ever seen
@@InvaderMedia420me too😭
@@supdog12hi
Parker without his mute button can't debate anyone as usual, his place is in his TikTok's not in a debate room
Charlie Kirk deserves all the respect for being so calm and composed through out this heated debate w these woke kids who are here just to speak their opinion but never once listened to what the other person is saying.
Quote. " IM SPEAKING. NO IM SPEAKING. IM SPEAKING"
Definition of woke. State your case, shout down/dismiss anyone who would "possibly consider" disagreement with your ignorant self.
Why do they vote out the ones that are genuinely trying to debate but leave the ones who get emotional and just scream??
Because they are fighting against his views, whenever he creates a point that will affect the debate they vote the person out
They aren't there willing to listen
@@lezardvyexactly, I feel bad for these kids since they have no idea how much they’ve been brainwashed
Well i mean if u think about it most Liberals are just emotional fruit cakes by default 😂
IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ...
entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....
The concept of being voted out so quickly by your peers demonstrates the callous disregard of views that differ from your own.
This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.
That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.
Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result
Well said 🤔.
Well said
why were people raising their flags so fast? this wasnt even a full discussion, people kept getting cut off
They wanted to end the conversation when it became clear their side was losing ground.
@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.
@@Jagged-Dust-Jacket Yeah it's not ideal. But it is an interesting idea and fun to watch.
Democrats 😂😂
Because if there was even remotely a hint of thinking differently than the mass thought, they wanted them gone
i really enjoy when he debates with dean they both have a great way of explaining things. need a 1 on 1 debate with them.
It annoys me how when a real conversation where they find a middle ground, everyone raises their red flags
Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.
@@b3sso862I still don’t understand what the red flags mean
Children just want a podium to scream and call attention to themselves. It’s how Gen Z was raised.
The liberals hive mind.. squash truth and sensibility at all cost.. no rationale allowed . I have to scream my point of view first
Yeah, they want to get their loser out and hopefully find someone who can interrupt Charlie better
Whoever didn’t talk over Charlie and be completely disrespectful got red flagged. These people are ridiculous
Charlie talked over EVERYONE
@@ghostwmost4938no he didn’t he was talking and got talked over and just kept talking very different
didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.
@@whisperissleepimgzzzparker
@@ghostwmost4938 It was mostly back and forth.
Today I learned that debates are 85% asking questions back and forth and only 15% answering each other's questions
Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.
Aww you watched the presidential debate I see
This is true for the liberal crowd. Charlie Kirk almost never get to finish his answer.
Also to just make ridiculous comparisons
Bc he always interrupts ppl.@@_w_w_
I don’t want Maren to be my Psychiatrist 😂
😂
oh heck naw bro I'd end up worse leaving her office 😂
She looks like she’s chewing her own face
A debate between parker and Ben Shapiro would need to be played at .25 speed for anyone to be able to understand.
And zero valid points would be made on either end
I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂
@@nylens471 goodluck trying to get them to understand that...
Honestly the most well suited person to debate ben is probably some no name in highschool
@@taylortiwari7118yooo you can predict the future???? That's crazy bro
Parker ignored every single topic and just attacked his faith. Im not religious, but that was pathetic. What a POS.
One of the most irritating brats there
That's because charlie kurt sees himself as christian nationalists
yea he annoyed me too, the interrupting argument, not debates needs an i got you moment for his tiki toki
I feel like I’ve seen Parker on tik tok
@@AbimaelLopez-hz3qqI"m sorry you had to see that. 😐
The first girl got voted out because she didn’t agree with abortion. I actually wanted to hear what she had to say
She got voted out becuase the liberals can’t bear to listen to an opinion that’s not theirs
FROM THE RlVER TO THE SEE!!! 🩸🩸
I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.
@@OsirusIrdia So we dont want to hear peoples opinions???? If u hate freedom of speech that bad i suggest you go to North korea
@@MasterChief968yea exactly. They didn’t wanna hear eachother speak they just wanted to speak 😂
@@MasterChief968crazy world we live in
a debate is a debate, shouldnt get too personal and start attacking the other's family.... she needs to chill
The concept of rushing the chair is weird. Do it by random choice.
Yeah, that was a bit weird. Felt a little too aggressive for the type of video this is supposed to be.
Yep and then the person who gets to the chair first doesn’t know what they’re talking about or the convo goes nowhere like in the beginning with Naima
no. i like watching liberals try and exert energy. they don't do it often.
Why do they have others raise the flags for different speakers? Is it because they think the speaker sucks?
@@DrewTBG Bruh, the healthiest states are all liberal leaning ones you dork.
They kept voting out the speaker way too early on, at least let them try to make a point...
they had no arguments except attacking the person not the argument
yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off
@@MJ-mi9qc It's cause he was exactly parroting the current woke liberal thought process. Any deviation and it's bad.
@@MJ-mi9qc its because he said he agreed that abortion after 20 weeks or whatever shouldn't be legal.
Yeah it's really annoying. They should give them at least 1 minute and then after that time they can be voted out.
I hated the flags. It really disrupted the conversations.
Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .
The flags mostly kept the less intelligent arguments from continuing to actual point
80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.
The conservative one is night and day. Lol
I really hate the rush to the chair. I mean we have the technology to randomly select people. It's a one-line script command. Weird.
I love how he states a fact and they act like they are appalled hearing it, like they don’t experience reality.
he didnt state any fact lil bro
The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.
He was being too polite and wasn't yelling insults, which showed the group that he wasn't a woke individual
They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.
Definitely polite, knowledgeable, and wrong lol
True, but its still pre conception
Almost seems like they voted him off to make Kirk stop talking lmfao.
why did that one girl even come into the argument without the proper knowledge of what a C SECTION is
fr tho
She didn't know the full term cesarean section, but she understood when he said c section
@@Hippyhop888her comment still stands. u come into a convo w bare minimum education and most the things she said get debunked w ease.
Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument
and these are the same people that can vote, smh
The red flags are great examples to show just how *quick* the students were to “kick” each other out, if they said something wrong.
Absolutely, lol. Not towing the line.
Not something “wrong” but different from their opinions. What happened to open minded individuals.
I noticed that too. Reflective of their society.
14% of the population should run over half of everything? thats not “inclusive” for the 86% ?
Remember the slaves were sacked and sold into slavery by other blacks (moors slave traders)
A huge applause to Parker’s parents for never disowning him 👏👏
One of my favorite things on this planet, is when people think that laughing at someones argument suddenly makes them correct
Frrr
or laughing at information or words they dont know or understand to protect their ego and make the speaker look like the ignorant one
That's their last line of defense before their ego goes flat!
Urban basketball people do that. It’s astounding to witness. 🤓
It's childish.
Why is parker just attacking his religion and completely ignoring the main topic in every single instance he gets n the chair, not once but 3 times he changed the subject to attack charlies religion instead of addressing the topic
Because he wants to get Charlie pissed off to get him to say something out of pocket. I’ll give Parker this, he’s a smart kid yet very unwise and condescending.
@@andrewmoriarty3359id say he's intelligent but not smart.
Because his main reasons are coming from his religion so you have to “attack” the basis to understand.
Because he’s a worm that’s never been punched in his face or been in any other conflict beyond words. He’s the kind of person push someone to physicality, then call the cops once he’s knocked out
@@josephfouche2006 Exactly, if you're going to base your root knowledge on 'religious science' it's already flawed as it requires 'belief' without proof, the biggest argument ever.
This is prime example of listening to respond rather than listening to learn…
On both sides.
@@Cyanpatagonus 100 percent
Yes. I’m glad you commented this.
I dont think I have ever seen, on this scale, this type of the arrogance of ignorance in my life.
"I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING!"
“Kamala’s greatest achievement was destroying the Republican Party” lol, that didn’t age well. I guess He just helped prove Charlie’s point.
This debate format sucks. The second you start getting a decent debate they vote the person out
It is awful which is why it is hilarious.
Agreed, it's literally so unproductive and horrible 😂
does this shows the real true of them. selfish.
The less woke people speak the better
Lefties don't like debates.
It's difficult to win a debate against a smart person. it's impossible to win a debate against an ignorant person.
Its like humans keep getting dumber each year. This is why i stay far away from them.
It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question.
The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.
@@ESquaredSolutions Respectful? They insulted him constantly lol
@@j.t.8685 I dont think so
@@ESquaredSolutions hahaha 'respectful' they sounded like a bunch of reddtors
Parker’s obsession with Christianity was ultimately his downfall. Completely avoided the main topic
He was there to get content for his TikTok not to debate. It's all about "gotcha" moments and not intelligent discourse
Parker = beta
The moment he defined what a woman is was the moment that he was yapping more than Charlie
yeah, questions was about women and he keeps bring up Charlie's faith.
Typical lost kid. 😂
Lord, please help Parker to have an encounter with you. Soften his heart and help him to see who you really are.
Nah that’s a lost child lol let him be
Parker is really smart and knows how to show empathy for the minorities, things that a lot of christians doesn't seem able to do.
I don't see why you guys think you're above him and are "praying" for him when you could learn things from him.
Charlie Kirk: "Hello, nice to meet you."
Liberal: "Hel-"
*11/21 flags raised*
😂😂😂😂
Liberals 🙄
@@NoName-1239 it happened the same with you republicans and Dean... its annoying... everyone just wants to have their chance at the spotlight
@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views
@@angelusmortis3256 Libfart.
This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?
Most people talk to speak and be heard and too few people listen and respond.
@@alexrice1870Conversations are not one directional. Just because someone is speaking doesn't mean that you're only supposed to listen and respond.
That kid just wanted to think he was smarter 🤡
sadly that's how 'debates' work nowadays
Fr
I found it extremely annoying that people trying to have an actual debate get voted out, but people like Parker get to talk the most
Parker is a big TT guy that does hours and hours of debate and makes bank. He's annoying AF.
@@Skirraq um no wtf i thought parker was great ?
@@makananigraceof course you did, talking fast and with dialect doesn’t equate to making strong points….
@@makananigraceI’ve seen Parker’s debates on TikTok’s and I was really excited, but he was the only one who actually really annoyed me I’m ngl
@@makananigrace😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 No. No.
Parker has a bizzare fixation on Christianity it's so weird. He's never on topic. He really needs to spend less time on Reddit
As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework
Me too bruh. The arguments are BONKERS, the premise BONKERS
Wokism at its finest, stop discussing points when they are no longer relevant to what you feel.
Independent aka republican 😂
i would argue that there were many valid points. mostly from the krik side but also from the liberal side.
@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.
everybody raising their flags on that one girl who barely had 2 mins to talk, they literally are so rude
time stamp?
@@kairavideshpande6508 I got you: 8:39
I checked the amount of time, she had 44 seconds to talk
Because she sucked
I mean, she didn’t even know what a cesarean section is lol
This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.
It was pretty wild how emotionally unhinged these kids are...and I'm just 5 minutes in 😂
@@DChris3 It gets worse.
Charlie called the guy Impotent how is that not a personal attack?
He called the argument impotent...that is a different meaning@@ozzier9483
@@DChris3for real. That one girl was throwing so much of a fit that she may as well just laid on the floor and started kicking her feet.
I’m a college student and I feel embarassed for these “American” college students for their lack of reality 🤦🏻♀️
I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately.
We definitely live in a society, my friends
That's the first thing I knew how this would go when they didn't let her get past "I'm Catholic"
Great debates from everyone but the tall girl who looks like offspring from Alien Romulus, Destiny, and a literal demon.
Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees
I thought that was crazy too.
She was going about her argument rationally. Soon as religion is mentioned, she’s out.
they all wanted to see a dunk from their tribe...thats what our conversations are being reduced to
I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.
You'd have to track so many people and trust that they wouldn't screw the rules over. It wouldn't be efficient.
@@benjaminmedrano4493 have one person per person for tracking
That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.
@@GrowMasterGeneral I didn't really care for the rush to the chair. That's not really what debate is about. Interesting, but inconsequential.
If it were the other way round the conservatives wouldn't do that.
20:10 needs to grow tf up. Should be sent home for the comment made about his daughter . Complete immaturity at its best
I love how you’re mad at the girl who made that comment but you’re completely fine with Charlie Kirk claiming “the baby would be delivered” when a child victim of SA is forced to give birth to another child. And you wanna talk about immaturity?
Charlie: College is a scam
Parker: Church is a scam
You can believe Church is a scam, but that’s not an argument for college not being a scam.
Exactly what I was thinking. He can use that as an argument later, but it has nothing to do with the original argument.
also there arent much church force you to pay to attend, and you can always go to other church, college need to pay college fund
Also, the LDS church isn’t even true Christianity, they are a cult.
He's trying to poke holes in Charlie's logic being applied inconsistently, ie his argument is predicated on ideology instead of a objective view of the facts. It seems strange but it can be pretty effective against people like Charlie who are massive hypocrites and have very shallow reasoning for the positions they hold.
@@netron66no one is forced to go to college either
People also still need to remember that social media has made people get way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it
You think that being personally offended is a valid reason to hit someone?
@@adellaopthofdella2385 no but being insulted to your face is no matter who u are
Stole from Mike Tyson.
@@piojo51 I meant to quote him lol
@@adellaopthofdella2385 it is 😂 tf
just because someone is interrupting , talking louder and faster doesn't mean they are winning the argument lol
Come on now, don't ruin their whole plan.
Also if you’re actually winning the debate you don’t have to constantly say you’re winning the debate 😂😂😂
so what Charlie Kirk does all the time?
Fr so annoying
@@kayla9973shut up I’m speaking
Just cause you tell him you’re destroying him in the debate after every sentence doesn’t make it true lol
That one dude who just couldn’t stop bringing up religion when it had nothing to do with the subject was annoying. He’d make a terrible lawyer.
He didnt want a dialogue he wanted a monologue.
@@shinineagle23 parker sucks
I want to ask him what "Christian" cult he grew up in. Nobody has that much animosity for something without it being personal.
Agreed
It rlly was so annoying. He hates Christianity so much he can’t even stay on the actual topic.
bruh why are they waiving the flags for great arguments like wtf
What are the flags suppose to mean
Cause people don't wanna hear the truth
I think part of it is because they can answer the question better. And/or they just want to be heard
@@AlphaSporeGamingit means they are voting to switch the person out of the chair
@@nahyouremad correct but for example I feel like at this part 7:48 they raised the flags just to shut him up.
This is actually painful to watch. When someone actually has a valid point red flags pop up.
i think it's refreshing... to realize that you aren't off as bad as some of us
I know huh , even more painful to think how much their parents paid for their indoctrination
which ones had a valid point in your opinion..?
@@Sweep-u5k that’s what I was trying to figure out
This is evidence that the world is approaching the point of no return
This debate was amazing, thanks for having realized this video! From italy
"My name is-"
*11 red flags, disqualified*
slim shady
😂😂
The flags go up as soon as their feelings get hurt. Just to stop the subject
Seriously who designed this show
@@Digger-NickI think it was liberals and the comment section is not going the way they thought it would 🤔
Don’t rush the chair. Just make the circle smaller and give everyone three minutes.
Thank you this was weird to watch
But rushing the chair is part of what creates the high-pressure atmosphere and makes this fun. If you want an ordinary debate, there are plenty of those.
Buzzers!
I made a suggestion in the comments that maybe flags can't go up until the first 60-90 seconds of a new debate.
Charlie already does that on his own channel and the results are shockingly similar
I don’t think they ever figured out that they aren’t voting out Charlie
I thought the same thing...
Hahahahahahahahahaha omg that thought made this video even 1000× better haha
This is the best comment I've seen in a long time LOL
I don’t usually say this but this is genuinely a hilarious comment wtf💀💀💀💀
🤣🤣🤣🤣
That girl at 17:42, that is the worst person i have seen today on internet. Congrat!
"I don't know what a c-section is". 11 flags immediately.
She never said she doesn't know what a c section is, she just didn't know the full term. Still a valid reason to vote her out.
@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life
@@misfitm1457That is just false
@@misfitm1457 So its bad to save the life of the mother and the child?
She didn't deserve that
Proverbs 18:2, “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but in expressing his own opinion” pretty much sums up all these jubilee videos
Amen
Amen
Amen
Amin
Exactly.
Noticed that anyone that remotely agreed with Charlie instantly got red flags?
They're just children trying to aggravate the adult.
Communism loves censorship
Charlie is Zionist lol
I wonder why 😑
Yeah because all this kids are not smart and can’t think for themselves. They just listen to their professors.
mustache guy with his "air snaps" are so essential to prove the person in the chairs point. thankfully he is there to add to the argument.
The rushing to the chair is so ridiculous..
yes especially since some are sitting on the back wont make it as fast as people who are sitting in front of him
fr
thats part of his tactic of putting them off their game.
@@slapshotLC thats cope and an excuse
Yeah they could’ve easily had a random name ballot
Rude behavior is a clear sign of weak argument and you loose automatically.
boo hoo
@@turbotaro3714you’re one of the people he’s talking about sad to see
@@turbotaro3714lol proving his point
@@turbotaro3714proving his point is crazy lil bro
@@tei_the_boy2367 you just used an insult. Because of this you have a weak argument and have thus lost. I’ll take my medal by mail.
It’s crazy how 25 people who share the same opinion, struggle to share the same opinion.
People can agree with a topic and desagree with other topic, it would be the same if as 25 conservatives
Being in one political party does not make you agree with every single point of that party
It’s crazy how wtvr u commented here doesn’t make sense at all
@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party
that’s not crazy… that’s called being an individual, everyone isnt just a carbon copy of eachother.
The fact that most people clapped at the ending of the first discussion says a lot
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
No I'm Speaking 🗣️
She’s giving “Kamala” lol
hilarious
No I’m speaking
Insufferable
Cringe fest with her
I love how people start putting up their flags when the person starts agreeing with Charlie
It’s because they struggle in a debate setting, not because they agree
@@apexnp It's because they are learning in real time that their opinions are incorrect
It’s cause they are hearing things they don’t like
And the person arguing on their behalf is losing the arguement
@ultraprogamerprogamer8090 yes! I've noticed that, once Charlie starts making great points/saying tough things that are hard to hear, they put the flags up & want it to end. Hilarious. Can't handle the opinions of others & further proves they want people to coddle/baby them, even if that means lie...than to hear the truth, even if it hurts.
@@SeverianofNessus nah its because half of these kids haven't actually formed proper opinions on these topics, while charlie's job is literally to formulate and distribute conservative opinions. its not that their opinions were 'wrong' just mostly taken from other sources, without the logical backing where the opinions actually originated.
I’m glad that no one was speaking with only emotion and there was minimum interruption
Lmao
😂😂😂
Women always get emotional when talking about abortion because it can directly effect their life.
I get that. But it's always a bad look when you can't control your emotions. I say for abortions let liberal men debate, if you can't control yourself.
@@berkay6947 women can't control their emotions a majority of the time especially when you talk about topics like abortion, dating age gap, etc. They have the inability to seperate the issue from taking it personal.
@@sirij8784 Those women really shouldn't be called women, more like girls. There are females out there that are cool calm and collected (experienced, most likely, because they have to be that way for the stability of their children who don't have the capability to control their emotions).
I have debates with many men, my husband actually brings his friends and family to debate with me lol. People from my generation (Gen Z) are more likely to have these kinds of debates than those of older generations. I've seen many older women like Kristan Hawkins do wonderfully during debates. Amala Ekpunobi is a great female debater who is Gen Z, I recommend you check her out.
“Yes the child will be delivered” disgusting.
The moment someone makes a personal attack/insults you've already lost the argument.
I couldn't agree more
lack of intelligence fr
@@mrk1224rage bait 👍
@@mrk1224insult are a sign of low IQ, especially in a debate
@@mrk1224 what makes that true?
Parker’s inability to have a civil debate is insane. His entire strategy was to interrupt him and talk over him.
Not only that he tends to always go off topic.
Parker must be on Aderall. He looks like he hardly ever sleeps. All of these irrelevant, rapid-fire questions are extremely annoying. He'll probably become a schizophrenic if he keeps up this life style. I wouldn't be surprised if he already has OCD.
Literally he was making me upset changing the subject and all then telling him that the guy isn’t answering his questions like slow down dude
simple absense of knowing what respect is and how to build up a constructive dialogue, such people always talk fast, interrupt and swap topics every second in attempt to overload their opponent with different useless information
Cause charlie was interrupting all the time so that's the only way to have a conversation with him
Personal attacks, rambling, and injections have no place in a discussion
Especially that girl who talk about Charlie's daughter
That's a complete psychopatic, child abusing hysterical person @@alvinlin0202
"know-it-alls" who know nothing.,...naive & "wet behind the ears".
@@alvinlin0202evil women she is..
Rushing to a chair and instantaneously getting voted out also have no place in discussion
This channel is a cool concept. I love the shocked faces of the students when they hear something they find provocative or shocking.