I watch your videos for quite a while know and it took me this video to realize we live in the same country :-) The only thing I don't like about your channel is that there aren't as many videos to watch as I would have liked. Apparently, you do this all on your own and it's very impressive. Wish you the best.
Greetings from Alberta, Canada. I too will miss the event. Pensions don't allow 'frivolous' excursions. Grateful for the information you publish. Thank you.
I will be viewing the eclipse live, via a friends webcam. I am 65 and still find all the possibilities of modern technology amazing. The ginormous TV screen in a completely darkened room , should give me some notion of what I am 'missing'. Enjoy....
Scientists can figure this all out with the help of machines and computer models. Measuring the amount of light emitted by the Sun (or any star) at each wavelength of light tells us how hot it is.
@@bluedotdweller That's right. Also, we can look at Fraunhofer emission lines and measure their widths to infer the kinetic temperature of the plasma particles. The lines are broadened by the doppler shifts due to their thermal velocities.
Hey Blue! Greetings from a fellow Belgian! Love your vids keep up the good work! May i ask what region of Belgium you're from? I myself am from Antwerp region.
@@bluedotdweller Oei zo zou ik het niet bekijken hoor, maar ondertiteling is misschien wel aangeraden ;) But West Flanders is beautiful! Nice to see fellow Belgians making quality science content! Thx for the answer
I’m so lucky to live right in the path of totality!! I witnessed a partial solar eclipse when I was a young child in the early 80’s, and it’s one of my fondest memories. I’m sorry you can’t be here 😢
Thank you. You have covered this topic with love and skill. Plus I comprehended it, mostly. The video clips of the sun added to the sense of awe I felt. Yes, quite a mystery! Your neat environment, including a spotless sewing table, added some character. I hope you enjoy doing them. I enjoy viewing them.
Im glad ive found this channel it really cool and informative, the path photons take from the centre to the surface is called 'the random walk of photons' and it can take between 100.000 years to 1000.000 years for photons to travel from the centre of the Sun to the surface where it can escape.
It’s way long since I heard anybody describe the particular benefit we have from the fact that our moon has no atmosphere. Or the difference earth’s atmosphere makes to how we see the lunar eclipse. Earth’s atmosphere keeps scattering a fair amount of sun’s light to illuminate moon’s surface that otherwise is nominally in earth’s shadow during the lunar eclipse. So, notice the sharp border during most of the solar eclipse.
The chromosphere, a layer of the Sun's atmosphere, is believed to have a temperature that increases with distance from the surface. However, there's a challenge to this idea. The traditional method of measuring temperature using light emission lines might not be accurate for the chromosphere because of its unique properties. Scientists are proposing that studying absorption lines from carbon monoxide molecules might be a better way to determine the temperature. These molecules act like tiny thermometers, and their energy levels can reveal the surrounding temperature. If this new method is proven correct, it could overturn our current understanding of the Sun's atmosphere. The data might indicate that the chromosphere actually cools down as it gets farther from the Sun's surface.
@@bluedotdweller R.W. Noyes and D.N.D. Hall. Thermal Oscillations in the High Solar Photosphere. Astrophys. J. 1972, 176, p. L89. S.K. Solanki, W. Livingston, K. Muglach, and L. Wallace. The beat of the solar chromosphere’s cold heart. Astron. Astropys. 1996, 315, 303-311. T.A. Schad and M.J. Penn. IR Spectroscopy of Chromosphere Dynamics with the CO first overtone band. Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol.331, Issue 6, p.589.
What does a photon do when it passes the sun's surface? Why is there a corona at all? Photons (probably) are not on a linear track away from the center of the sun. More likely there are crossed paths of photons that each photon must bump its way forward, backward, up, down, sideways, etc just like before leaving the surface. Bumbling its way through this wall of electrons trying to get out. The wall heats up as energy is pumped into it from the sun, but not released straight out into space. So the wall of meandering photons glows, like a corona. Eventually, the photon reaches the outer edge and is released in a straight line into space amid a swarm of photons shooting off in all directions, now with enough room to spread out and drop the heat of the corona into the cold of open space. Or it could be space gnomes.
Photons do not "travel" inside the sun. They are absorbed as quickly as they are emitted. Entropy slowly works the energy to the surface in various forms until it reaches the surface and mostly is radiated as light, magnetic flux, or kinetic motion.
Haha where did you get the thumbnail pic from? I had it sent to me right after it was taken and put it on my channel Broken Home Podcast! Such an amazing image
Great video. I've always found the magnetic reconnection model the most convincing. Just imagine the enormous magnetic field lines swooshing about at random and dragging the coronal plasma around at huge velocities, resulting in particles smashing into each other and getting incredibly hot.
The magnetic reconnection explanation of the "Model" is the most logical, but... the "Model" is not. - The Sun suppose to be a "Gas Giant", but this "Gas Giant" have a surface and atmosphere? This "Gas Giant" have specific gravity weight of 1.4per litter? I am sorry, but the weight of a liquid hydrogen is only 0.07per litter (70 grams). If all the sun is a liquid, its specific weight will be 70 grams per litter, but it is 1.4kg per liter. On the top of it the temperature is in the reverse sequence of the "Model" - Corona - 2,000,000, Photo sphere 10,000, Surface, 4,800, The Sun interior visible trough the sunspots is 3,000 only! When the "Model" not reflecting nature, is obvious that the "Model" is wrong. There is a book where all this anomalies are explained - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
@@playgroundchooser It is simple - if "Scientist" give you 20l petrol jar and insist that the Jar is empty, but the jar weight is 20kg - would you believe this "Scientist"? I will Not! Regardless of how many diplomas and academic titles he has.
@valentinmalinov8424 I'd trust the guy who emptied it. I don't know how you got mass and energy equivalence so mixed up my dude, but you know the Sun isn't a liquid, right? It's a plasma, so it's density can be dammned near any density you can come up with... right until you create a neutron star. So just don't go that far.
@@playgroundchooser Thank you very much, but I am a bit confused. What the energy equivalent has to do with Sun's mass? And in what physical state the Sun's Plasma is to weight 1.4 kg per liter? So far no matter how much you compress plasma and gas they will never weight more than liquid. And how you know that the Sun is Plasma, but is not liquid? Who been there to confirm it?
The reason it is so hot is because the particles are being accelerated by the magnetic fields and excited even more by extreme UV and x rays. This gives the particles temperatures in the millions of degrees, however the energy density is a lot less than that of the plasma in the chromasphere. The density of this region has a lot of collision that prevent the particles from reaching much beyond an average of about 5500k temperature. Once free from the high density the particles can absorb more energy without colliding so they get hotter. It's like inputting lots of amps into a transformer to create a lot less amps but at a much higher voltage. ❤
Problem : the corona of the sun is being heated Assumption: Liquid dark matter is raining down on the sun and as it’s velocity versus gravity reaches a zero G equivalent it flashes to gaseous dark matter which heats electrons in the the corona and accelerates a mix of electrons, liquid and gaseous dark matter back out into the solar system. This flow is what accelerates the solar wind. Problem : the area between the sun and the corona is much cooler Assumption: as the gravity increases the more gaseous dark matter condenses cooling this area(cooling being relative) Problem : what causes coronal holes and sunspot’s Assumption: as the condensed dark matter passes beneath the surface of the sun the temperature rises and near the core the gravity decreases the dark matter reverts to its gaseous state. The closest and primary release for this expansion is at the poles of the sun. As the dark matter nears the surface of the sun again most of it condenses and collapses which promotes circulation upward and outward. Momentum carries the liquid dark matter , gaseous dark matter and plasma out of sunspots into the solar system as the solar wind. The condensing dark matter results in the cooler areas on the surface of the sun. My thought is that if we could see the dark matter sphere that co-rotates around the sun it would look a lot like Jupiter except that dark matter is always being added and spun off or blasted into space. The offset of the dark matter sphere and the sun is a major contributor to the sunspot cycle as the dark matter rotates around the geocenter of the solar system.
Please Please do a video on photons pairing and how you feel about prions and their subatomic reaction with either matter or antimatter? What would be your best guess to describe dark energy?
Hello fellow dweller. This is off topic, but I'm hoping you might have an answer, or at least the curiosity to learn something new in this regard. We know the Sun will heat up in the future, and we're dealing with global warming in the present. You may have heard of the suggestion that we float a bunch of mirrors in L-1 which experts agree would be prohibitively difficult and expensive. But what if we floated a catcher craft in L-1 and we rail launch material from the Moon. The idea is to crash the material into the catcher craft. From there, turn it into equal sized particles and spray them towards the Sun and against the solar winds in a way as to maximize the useful hang time. In other words, use Moon dust as a Sun shade. One huge advantage is that you could put the catcher craft a little towards Earth and use the impacts to push it outward. (free deceleration). Does this seem like an idea worthy of investigation in your opinion?
Woman: “Our ancestors did have the knowledge to understand eclipses”. Me: They predicted eclipses and stars with math better than most universities before Galileo and Pythagoras were born. Lets look at this like our ancestors would I think: Light a candle, put your hand around the flame as close as you can, put your hand right above the flame.
that temperature is not measured, though. it's purely extrapolated from the ionization of the atoms in the corona, assuming that the only mechanism causing such ionization could be temperature. but many mechanisms apart from temperature can cause ionization, so this has always just been a stupid assumption.
Can science explain why so many youtubers are compelled to have great big condenser microphones mounted on articulated microphone stands, when a lavalier microphone will do as good a job?
The Sun gets it main source of energy by breaking down the hydrogen proton back into a pure Poynting flux, directly from the photosphere surface, Fusion is a mere side effect of the electric currents in the chromosphere, fusing protons into heavier elements, and the process usually skips helium for a more dense-pack atom like carbon or oxygen. The proton-proton chain is just propaganda from Hans Beth. Helium is an alpha particle from radioactive fission that occurs in the prominences and flares. Fusion has never been shown to give off neutrinos nor create energy on par with the Sun, proton annihilation has and also gives off neutrinos.
Which reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal have you published this in? Or is it just your way of sounding superior in a RUclips comment section?
@@MrDino1953 The data from CERN shows that the annihilation of the hydrogen proton gives off energy on par with e=mc^2 and now shows that neutrons are giving off in the process. Dig into the works of Hannes Alfven on how the Sun must give its energy off in the photosphere, not from below. Minus the matter-antimatter idea. Also check out the Forbes article on how "the Sun's energy does not come from fusing hydrogen into helium mostly." Show me a peer-reviewed article that show how they made the proton-proton chain has been verified. The main constituents of the solar wind particles peak at oxygen and carbon, not helium. In fact, the particles from the Sun are accelerated by first ionization potential, not by mass. So far neutrinos are given off in fission processes, not fusion. Show me a peer-reviewed article that shows how neutrinos have been verified in fusion processes. When you eliminate the impossible, such as the idea that the sun gets its main source of energy from fusion, whatever else remains is on the table, such as annihilation of the hydrogen proton, as verified by CERN and other super colliders.
"Scientist's are baffled" clickbaits tend to be a little mystifying in themselves. So, from what I can understand, a whole two mins 30secs into this explanation, is that these -scientist- guys have photons that run around in little squiggles for tens of thousands of years... and never think, "Hey guys! the rest of the little photons all discover that some materials are not transparent." Because, well... these are really superior _scientist_ guys, with much better photons than the rest of us can have. Lessse...if I take a 40watt led lightbulb, pack it in concrete and throw the switch....my little photons will decide to take their time about ...? ahhh What exactly? cuz the concrete is getting a little warm already and this experiment has blown my budget. I know, what if our photons decide to behave just like all of our other photons until they get snuffed out every time a nearby hydrogen fusion reaction decided to only convert a small percentage of the available hydrogen to energy...because they got all stuck up on how superior they were and forgot that the helium that just pooped out of noplace has to decay? Then we can have some of them big jewels and naught, naught, naught naught, bigger than a bizzillion, clickbait things going on.....and rip off those superior photons, cuz they ain't ever gonna get here?
@@jasongarcia2140 How about if I do a rewrite with a nice catchy $clickbait title, like: "Really smart, high paid, government, geeky people have received alien signals and want your help in deciphering them. Link below" ??
If you dare to look directly into the Sun with your own eyes. It takes some training in order to do it. You will realize very soon that the Sun isnt what they are showing you in these images.
Well, it must be *C O 2* production....so how can we fix this 'problem' by charging business, and passing it on to the consumer... I guarantee I don't want to pay for the Sun's CO2 production...and government can't make me...:)
I agree with you, but the specific weight of liquid hydrogen is only 70 grams per liter, and Sun's weight is 1.4kg per liter. How you will explain this enormous anomaly?
@@valentinmalinov8424 The sun doesn't contain only hydrogen. The weight you are referring to is based on the gravitational force it asserts, not an actual measurement of a specific volume weight ratio. Gravity is not what Einstein speculated it to be. Hydrogen might weigh 70 grams per liter at ocean level under the Earths atmosphere. But that weight is not an universal constant.
The youtube algo works in mysterious ways, but every so often it suggests a gem of a channel like yours.
Dear Algorithm, thankyou for guiding me through the content to find a human talking about interesting things.
Amen
Can’t agree more.
I watch your videos for quite a while know and it took me this video to realize we live in the same country :-)
The only thing I don't like about your channel is that there aren't as many videos to watch as I would have liked.
Apparently, you do this all on your own and it's very impressive.
Wish you the best.
a fluorescent tube, the filament of the tube is about 800C, but the plasma is over 11000C
Greetings from Alberta, Canada. I too will miss the event. Pensions don't allow 'frivolous' excursions. Grateful for the information you publish. Thank you.
I absolutely love your channel. Thank you for all the effort you put into it!!! Watching from Albuquerque New Mexico USA.
Thanks for being here! Are you going to see the eclipse?
@@bluedotdweller Not in my area unfortunately.
I will not be able to view the event either. Your presentation is considered, by me, a most exquisite conciliation. More love from Albuquerque.
New to watching your channel. 🍻 Hello from Vancouver, BC, Canada
I will be viewing the eclipse live, via a friends webcam.
I am 65 and still find all the possibilities of modern technology amazing.
The ginormous TV screen in a completely darkened room , should give me some notion of what I am 'missing'.
Enjoy....
In 2017 my daughter lived in Madras, OR ground zero. Japanese rented the grade school sports field behind her house. Was a great eclipse.
My first thought…Who measured these temperatures??
Scientists can figure this all out with the help of machines and computer models. Measuring the amount of light emitted by the Sun (or any star) at each wavelength of light tells us how hot it is.
@@bluedotdweller That's right. Also, we can look at Fraunhofer emission lines and measure their widths to infer the kinetic temperature of the plasma particles. The lines are broadened by the doppler shifts due to their thermal velocities.
Lord Kelvin
It has never been measured.
@@BloobleBonker They did t with carbon monoxide and it showed the temperature is decreasing with the elevation. Surprise!
YES! I hadn't even expected this one, like an unexpected gift... ❤️ Thanks!
I cant believe how the eclipse looked it was much more amazing than I thought it would be.
Glad you enjoyed it!
BlueDot Rules! more please. I always learn something when listening too you. Thanks Yo!
Hey Blue!
Greetings from a fellow Belgian! Love your vids keep up the good work!
May i ask what region of Belgium you're from? I myself am from Antwerp region.
I'm from West Flanders. Obviously that means we're mortal enemies. Jokes aside, happy to have you on the channel!
@@bluedotdweller Oei zo zou ik het niet bekijken hoor, maar ondertiteling is misschien wel aangeraden ;) But West Flanders is beautiful! Nice to see fellow Belgians making quality science content! Thx for the answer
I'm in upstate New York, and the weather is so unpredictable here! Cross your fingers for me 🤞🤞🤞🤞
Good luck!
I’m so lucky to live right in the path of totality!! I witnessed a partial solar eclipse when I was a young child in the early 80’s, and it’s one of my fondest memories. I’m sorry you can’t be here 😢
I hope you enjoy the eclipse! Maybe I'll get lucky again someday, but I'll have to travel for it.
Thank you. You have covered this topic with love and skill. Plus I comprehended it, mostly. The video clips of the sun added to the sense of awe I felt. Yes, quite a mystery!
Your neat environment, including a spotless sewing table, added some character. I hope you enjoy doing them. I enjoy viewing them.
Im glad ive found this channel it really cool and informative, the path photons take from the centre to the surface is called 'the random walk of photons' and it can take between 100.000 years to 1000.000 years for photons to travel from the centre of the Sun to the surface where it can escape.
You have to drop a short or a teaser so we know you’re going to post. The Sun, our Sun. BDD, how did we get so lucky!
It’s way long since I heard anybody describe the particular benefit we have from the fact that our moon has no atmosphere. Or the difference earth’s atmosphere makes to how we see the lunar eclipse. Earth’s atmosphere keeps scattering a fair amount of sun’s light to illuminate moon’s surface that otherwise is nominally in earth’s shadow during the lunar eclipse. So, notice the sharp border during most of the solar eclipse.
The chromosphere, a layer of the Sun's atmosphere, is believed to have a temperature that increases with distance from the surface. However, there's a challenge to this idea.
The traditional method of measuring temperature using light emission lines might not be accurate for the chromosphere because of its unique properties. Scientists are proposing that studying absorption lines from carbon monoxide molecules might be a better way to determine the temperature. These molecules act like tiny thermometers, and their energy levels can reveal the surrounding temperature.
If this new method is proven correct, it could overturn our current understanding of the Sun's atmosphere. The data might indicate that the chromosphere actually cools down as it gets farther from the Sun's surface.
THis makes intuitive sense, since objects cool as they distance themselves from heat sources
That's so interesting! Could you point me to where I can read more about this?
It is not temperature producing the spectra but electric fields. How high a temp is needed to ionise water vs the electric field strength?
@@bluedotdweller R.W. Noyes and D.N.D. Hall. Thermal Oscillations in the High Solar Photosphere. Astrophys. J. 1972, 176, p. L89.
S.K. Solanki, W. Livingston, K. Muglach, and L. Wallace. The beat of the solar chromosphere’s cold heart. Astron. Astropys. 1996, 315, 303-311.
T.A. Schad and M.J. Penn. IR Spectroscopy of Chromosphere Dynamics with the CO first overtone band. Astronomische Nachrichten, Vol.331, Issue 6, p.589.
What does a photon do when it passes the sun's surface?
Why is there a corona at all?
Photons (probably) are not on a linear track away from the center of the sun. More likely there are crossed paths of photons that each photon must bump its way forward, backward, up, down, sideways, etc just like before leaving the surface.
Bumbling its way through this wall of electrons trying to get out. The wall heats up as energy is pumped into it from the sun, but not released straight out into space. So the wall of meandering photons glows, like a corona.
Eventually, the photon reaches the outer edge and is released in a straight line into space amid a swarm of photons shooting off in all directions, now with enough room to spread out and drop the heat of the corona into the cold of open space.
Or it could be space gnomes.
Photons do not "travel" inside the sun. They are absorbed as quickly as they are emitted. Entropy slowly works the energy to the surface in various forms until it reaches the surface and mostly is radiated as light, magnetic flux, or kinetic motion.
@@gregmarsters2434 ... Please see time stamp 00:47 in the video for info on photons travel within the sun
I'm very glad to live within one hour of the path of totality.
As always a pleasure to watch and listen to your videos. Thanks a lot for another great video.
Great to have your expertise & intelligence applied to our learning🔭🌌
Haha where did you get the thumbnail pic from? I had it sent to me right after it was taken and put it on my channel Broken Home Podcast! Such an amazing image
Great video. I've always found the magnetic reconnection model the most convincing. Just imagine the enormous magnetic field lines swooshing about at random and dragging the coronal plasma around at huge velocities, resulting in particles smashing into each other and getting incredibly hot.
The magnetic reconnection explanation of the "Model" is the most logical, but... the "Model" is not. - The Sun suppose to be a "Gas Giant", but this "Gas Giant" have a surface and atmosphere? This "Gas Giant" have specific gravity weight of 1.4per litter? I am sorry, but the weight of a liquid hydrogen is only 0.07per litter (70 grams). If all the sun is a liquid, its specific weight will be 70 grams per litter, but it is 1.4kg per liter. On the top of it the temperature is in the reverse sequence of the "Model" - Corona - 2,000,000, Photo sphere 10,000, Surface, 4,800, The Sun interior visible trough the sunspots is 3,000 only! When the "Model" not reflecting nature, is obvious that the "Model" is wrong. There is a book where all this anomalies are explained - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
@@valentinmalinov8424 da hell you talking about? 😂😂
@@playgroundchooser It is simple - if "Scientist" give you 20l petrol jar and insist that the Jar is empty, but the jar weight is 20kg - would you believe this "Scientist"? I will Not! Regardless of how many diplomas and academic titles he has.
@valentinmalinov8424 I'd trust the guy who emptied it.
I don't know how you got mass and energy equivalence so mixed up my dude, but you know the Sun isn't a liquid, right? It's a plasma, so it's density can be dammned near any density you can come up with... right until you create a neutron star. So just don't go that far.
@@playgroundchooser Thank you very much, but I am a bit confused. What the energy equivalent has to do with Sun's mass? And in what physical state the Sun's Plasma is to weight 1.4 kg per liter? So far no matter how much you compress plasma and gas they will never weight more than liquid. And how you know that the Sun is Plasma, but is not liquid? Who been there to confirm it?
The reason it is so hot is because the particles are being accelerated by the magnetic fields and excited even more by extreme UV and x rays. This gives the particles temperatures in the millions of degrees, however the energy density is a lot less than that of the plasma in the chromasphere. The density of this region has a lot of collision that prevent the particles from reaching much beyond an average of about 5500k temperature. Once free from the high density the particles can absorb more energy without colliding so they get hotter. It's like inputting lots of amps into a transformer to create a lot less amps but at a much higher voltage. ❤
Problem : the corona of the sun is being heated
Assumption: Liquid dark matter is raining down on the sun and as it’s velocity versus gravity reaches a zero G equivalent it flashes to gaseous dark matter which heats electrons in the the corona and accelerates a mix of electrons, liquid and gaseous dark matter back out into the solar system. This flow is what accelerates the solar wind.
Problem : the area between the sun and the corona is much cooler
Assumption: as the gravity increases the more gaseous dark matter condenses cooling this area(cooling being relative)
Problem : what causes coronal holes and sunspot’s
Assumption: as the condensed dark matter passes beneath the surface of the sun the temperature rises and near the core the gravity decreases the dark matter reverts to its gaseous state. The closest and primary release for this expansion is at the poles of the sun. As the dark matter nears the surface of the sun again most of it condenses and collapses which promotes circulation upward and outward. Momentum carries the liquid dark matter , gaseous dark matter and plasma out of sunspots into the solar system as the solar wind. The condensing dark matter results in the cooler areas on the surface of the sun. My thought is that if we could see the dark matter sphere that co-rotates around the sun it would look a lot like Jupiter except that dark matter is always being added and spun off or blasted into space. The offset of the dark matter sphere and the sun is a major contributor to the sunspot cycle as the dark matter rotates around the geocenter of the solar system.
You're absolutely awesome!
Thanks again Bluedot 😊 I missed the total Eclipse tooo😢. I’ll be in Fl for the next one
That is such an interesting puzzle! thanks for sharing! It could also be there is new sciene insight(s) needed for this phenomena to be explained.
dragon lamp is goated.
Hello, your channel name is interesting to me. I wonder if we have a similar experience?
Oh it just came to me....is the blue dot earth?
1:40 you just said this granular pattern is a convection zone . But say the Corona is hotter than the photosphere. That doesn't make any sense.
Please Please do a video on photons pairing and how you feel about prions and their subatomic reaction with either matter or antimatter? What would be your best guess to describe dark energy?
I really like your style
Hello fellow dweller. This is off topic, but I'm hoping you might have an answer, or at least the curiosity to learn something new in this regard.
We know the Sun will heat up in the future, and we're dealing with global warming in the present.
You may have heard of the suggestion that we float a bunch of mirrors in L-1 which experts agree would be prohibitively difficult and expensive.
But what if we floated a catcher craft in L-1 and we rail launch material from the Moon. The idea is to crash the material into the catcher craft. From there, turn it into equal sized particles and spray them towards the Sun and against the solar winds in a way as to maximize the useful hang time.
In other words, use Moon dust as a Sun shade. One huge advantage is that you could put the catcher craft a little towards Earth and use the impacts to push it outward. (free deceleration).
Does this seem like an idea worthy of investigation in your opinion?
We get the same thing happen around earth, there’s a part of the atmosphere that’s much much hotter than the surface
Woman: “Our ancestors did have the knowledge to understand eclipses”.
Me: They predicted eclipses and stars with math better than most universities before Galileo and Pythagoras were born.
Lets look at this like our ancestors would I think: Light a candle, put your hand around the flame as close as you can, put your hand right above the flame.
that temperature is not measured, though. it's purely extrapolated from the ionization of the atoms in the corona, assuming that the only mechanism causing such ionization could be temperature. but many mechanisms apart from temperature can cause ionization, so this has always just been a stupid assumption.
I love your channel but i want to know why it's so hot right now lol
One possibility is (electrical) energy is coming from outside the sun.
Maybe gravity holds ions and the heat builds up in them.
calculate that as the exit of a black hole and maybe it fits, taken as plasmic electro fluid?
Yes, 12 hours from now. But we expect overcast sky. 🤦🏻♂️
That's so unlucky! Maybe it'll clear up, when I saw the eclipse in 1999, the day started overcast but it got better.
@@bluedotdweller We zullen zien. Of niet. 😁.
Either way, it’ll go dark for a couple of minutes!
Because the sun is metalic not plasma.
Not literally metals are anything other than hydrogen when referring to stars.
It's a lightbulb. It get's it energy from the Milky Way / other galactical connections.
Can science explain why so many youtubers are compelled to have great big condenser microphones mounted on articulated microphone stands, when a lavalier microphone will do as good a job?
It's cause our sun is also home to a lifeform that can only survive on suns like ours.
Maybe it is friction
Theres unknown matter circling the sun
SMH... the solar atmosphere?... you realise that goes all the way out to the heliopause?...right?
Is there a problem here? Lmao why are you shaking your head wtf
Both explanations together sounds the most likely.
The Sun gets it main source of energy by breaking down the hydrogen proton back into a pure Poynting flux, directly from the photosphere surface,
Fusion is a mere side effect of the electric currents in the chromosphere, fusing protons into heavier elements, and the process usually skips helium for a more dense-pack atom like carbon or oxygen.
The proton-proton chain is just propaganda from Hans Beth.
Helium is an alpha particle from radioactive fission that occurs in the prominences and flares.
Fusion has never been shown to give off neutrinos nor create energy on par with the Sun, proton annihilation has and also gives off neutrinos.
Which reputable, peer-reviewed scientific journal have you published this in? Or is it just your way of sounding superior in a RUclips comment section?
@@MrDino1953 The data from CERN shows that the annihilation of the hydrogen proton gives off energy on par with e=mc^2 and now shows that neutrons are giving off in the process.
Dig into the works of Hannes Alfven on how the Sun must give its energy off in the photosphere, not from below. Minus the matter-antimatter idea.
Also check out the Forbes article on how "the Sun's energy does not come from fusing hydrogen into helium mostly."
Show me a peer-reviewed article that show how they made the proton-proton chain has been verified.
The main constituents of the solar wind particles peak at oxygen and carbon, not helium. In fact, the particles from the Sun are accelerated by first ionization potential, not by mass.
So far neutrinos are given off in fission processes, not fusion.
Show me a peer-reviewed article that shows how neutrinos have been verified in fusion processes.
When you eliminate the impossible, such as the idea that the sun gets its main source of energy from fusion, whatever else remains is on the table, such as annihilation of the hydrogen proton, as verified by CERN and other super colliders.
You dropped this my guy: 🤡
@@playgroundchooser Good to see that you are aware that the standard solar model is a clown show.
@@playgroundchooser The fact is that none of the predicted features of the fusion at the core model are observed with our Sun.
We indians knew to calculate when are the solar Eclipse and lunar eclipse thousands of years ago. 😅
Electric Universe theory
"Scientist's are baffled" clickbaits tend to be a little mystifying in themselves.
So, from what I can understand, a whole two mins 30secs into this explanation, is that these -scientist- guys have photons that run around in little squiggles for tens of thousands of years... and never think, "Hey guys! the rest of the little photons all discover that some materials are not transparent." Because, well... these are really superior _scientist_ guys, with much better photons than the rest of us can have.
Lessse...if I take a 40watt led lightbulb, pack it in concrete and throw the switch....my little photons will decide to take their time about ...? ahhh What exactly? cuz the concrete is getting a little warm already and this experiment has blown my budget.
I know, what if our photons decide to behave just like all of our other photons until they get snuffed out every time a nearby hydrogen fusion reaction decided to only convert a small percentage of the available hydrogen to energy...because they got all stuck up on how superior they were and forgot that the helium that just pooped out of noplace has to decay? Then we can have some of them big jewels and naught, naught, naught naught, bigger than a bizzillion, clickbait things going on.....and rip off those superior photons, cuz they ain't ever gonna get here?
Wayyyy too long would never read lolol
@@jasongarcia2140 How about if I do a rewrite with a nice catchy $clickbait title, like: "Really smart, high paid, government, geeky people have received alien signals and want your help in deciphering them. Link below" ??
This eclipse is gonna start some shit in the US 😂 placebo effect
corona virus correlation
its been explained alrady...
❤❤
😁👍
Ahhhh ahhhhh ahhhhhhhhhhh bullshit 🤧!!
If you dare to look directly into the Sun with your own eyes. It takes some training in order to do it. You will realize very soon that the Sun isnt what they are showing you in these images.
Peepees and weewees
Well, it must be *C O 2* production....so how can we fix this 'problem' by charging business, and passing it on to the consumer...
I guarantee I don't want to pay for the Sun's CO2 production...and government can't make me...:)
Really nailing that "feminist keep away" look
They lie about the Sun and Stars!
I know this! Thanks. There is one good book for guys like you - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" (It is our book). Regards
Who is "they"?
Be specific. Use descriptive language to type your answer. Thank you.
@@jasongarcia2140 "They" are the guys which we are paying big salaries to lie to us.
I love the way you talk. I would marry you just for that. I also think you are so cute.❤️
The sun is liquid, not plasma.
Your mom is liquid.
I agree with you, but the specific weight of liquid hydrogen is only 70 grams per liter, and Sun's weight is 1.4kg per liter. How you will explain this enormous anomaly?
@@valentinmalinov8424 The sun doesn't contain only hydrogen. The weight you are referring to is based on the gravitational force it asserts, not an actual measurement of a specific volume weight ratio. Gravity is not what Einstein speculated it to be. Hydrogen might weigh 70 grams per liter at ocean level under the Earths atmosphere. But that weight is not an universal constant.