Yoshino INVESTIGATION - Are their Solid State Batteries REAL?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 окт 2024
  • Recently folks said Yoshino Solid State Battery Power Stations are fake & do not contain Solid State Batteries. I launched my own investigation to try to get some real answers. Let's see what I found and you decide.
    What Happens When an Outlet Gets Wet: • What REALLY HAPPENS WH...
    SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) Report: sc.sharefile.c...
    They also sent me this nail penetration test report. I didn't discuss this in the video since it didn't directly relate to solid state, but you may find it useful.
    Energy Assurance lab test: cdn.shopify.co...
    The video contains the whole file, if you just pause it, it may be easier than the link above.
    This video, description and comments contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!
    Disclaimer:
    Due to factors beyond the control of Silver Cymbal, I cannot guarantee against improper use or unauthorized modifications of this information. Silver Cymbal assumes no liability for property damage or injury incurred as a result of any of the information contained in this video. Use this information at your own risk. Silver Cymbal recommends safe practices when working on machines and or with tools seen or implied in this video. Due to factors beyond the control of Silver Cymbal, no information contained in this video shall create any expressed or implied warranty or guarantee of any particular result. Any injury, damage, or loss that may result from improper use of these tools, equipment, or from the information contained in this video is the sole responsibility of the user and not Silver Cymbal.

Комментарии • 62

  • @SilverCymbal
    @SilverCymbal  5 часов назад +12

    Thanks for watching, what do you guys think? If you can't handle the backstory & just want the goods go 2:55

    • @RichGee
      @RichGee 4 часа назад

      Once again, another great RUclips - carefully researched and thought out. One of my favorite channels.

    • @thefpvlife7785
      @thefpvlife7785 3 часа назад +1

      In short this is SSD 1.0. Things will improve as always over time.

  • @WillProwse
    @WillProwse 4 часа назад +49

    Oh heck yes hahah finally a good channel opening this thing up 🤩

    • @spankymagee
      @spankymagee 4 часа назад +5

      I love both of yalls channels. Glad you're visiting!

    • @SilverCymbal
      @SilverCymbal  4 часа назад +11

      You are 100x better at this one than me but I am good at antagonizing people so I went that route.

    • @thefpvlife7785
      @thefpvlife7785 3 часа назад

      Hey Will please follow up on this SSD topic. I just think it's SSD 1.0 and will improve with time.

    • @hificat101
      @hificat101 3 часа назад

      Were you the notorious punctureer Will?

    • @ProbeGT2
      @ProbeGT2 2 часа назад

      Hum, what's that odd smell?
      Ohh yeah, it's sarcasm! 😅

  • @oneisnone7350
    @oneisnone7350 4 часа назад +24

    It’s probably like the term “organic”. Even dog shit is organic. So, there’s probably a gray zone for the term solid state, and it sounds like they’re likely in it.

    • @trippwilson810
      @trippwilson810 3 часа назад +1

      The word “organic” has a specific definition when referencing food and is backed by regulatory standards from the USDA. It is illegal to refer to food as organic if it does not meet those rigorous standards.

    • @BoltRM
      @BoltRM 3 часа назад

      Some pill supplements say "it's from nature!"
      Everything is from nature 🙄

    • @Sylvan_dB
      @Sylvan_dB 3 часа назад +4

      @@trippwilson810 Chemistry also has a specific definition for organic. The USDAs definition of organic food was widely considered a compromise driven by large agribusiness so they could participate in what was dominated by small business. The chemistry definition of organic is at least rational and consistent rather than a profit driven checkbox.

  • @senatorchinchilla5389
    @senatorchinchilla5389 3 часа назад +17

    To me, it sure seems like they are proud of their product and will stand behind it. I don't know a ton about battery chemistry, but I am an engineer. They have given you a LOT of detailed info that a lying company would not be keen to share.

    • @corey6393
      @corey6393 3 часа назад +3

      Agreed. I know next to nothing on this topic, but it does seem the company has done a good job with clarity here.

    • @SilverCymbal
      @SilverCymbal  3 часа назад +4

      I was genuinely surprised, based on other comments I was ready to get no response at all.

  • @Rbeavs
    @Rbeavs 3 часа назад +5

    I always feel like I learn something watching your videos

  • @Sylvan_dB
    @Sylvan_dB 3 часа назад +2

    Yoshino almost certainly buys the cells for integration into their power station. So far the solid state battery industry is still new enough that dozens of different materials are under development and small scale production both as electrolyte and the anode and cathode. However, some are more solid than others. The less solid type are often referred to as semi-solid or quasi-solid. The cells Yoshino uses seem to me to be of the less solid type. This is still a significant reduction in liquid, but it isn't like the typical LiFePO4 or Lithium NCM or other commonly used cells are full of liquid that you can pour out if you open the cell. In other words, the typical lithium cells that are commonly in use today are not "flooded" cells. In those cells the liquid facilitates ion exchange - a necessary function of the battery.
    The key question is, is the liquid a passive element or does it participate in ion exchange between cathode and anode? If active then the cell is not solid state but might be considered semi-solid. If passive then the cell is technically solid state but might its components may have been compromised to reach performance or manufacturing goals.
    Personally I consider a further reduction in liquid is not enough to qualify as a solid state cell, and the behavior of the cells from the Yoshino power station does not seem to fulfill the promised safety characteristics of solid state batteries. This means to me that at best it is a compromised solid state cell, and if you don't achieve the promised safety and life benefits, it is deceptive advertising.

  • @thefpvlife7785
    @thefpvlife7785 3 часа назад +3

    In short this is SSD 1.0. Things will improve as always over time.

  • @fourpressmedia2674
    @fourpressmedia2674 3 часа назад +2

    Great explanation and follow up. Thank you!

  • @clownbaby420
    @clownbaby420 4 часа назад +1

    sounds like it's not a question of 'amount' of fluid but what it's used for. apparently, a 'solid state' battery could be gushing and guzzling with liquid so long as it's not used as the electrolyte.

  • @Samlol23_drrich
    @Samlol23_drrich 4 часа назад +4

    was that you questioning that witness? It certainly sounded like you.

    • @SilverCymbal
      @SilverCymbal  4 часа назад +1

      He did sound a bit like me, but it wasn't

    • @Samlol23_drrich
      @Samlol23_drrich 4 часа назад

      @@SilverCymbal I thought you were an attorney or judge in another life.....

    • @youdontknowme5969
      @youdontknowme5969 Час назад

      1:28 LOL

  • @muhammadwibisonojanuar7793
    @muhammadwibisonojanuar7793 4 часа назад +2

    What about CATL battery found on BYD? Can that solid state battery be used for power station too?

  • @alext8828
    @alext8828 4 часа назад +4

    What's the issue here, really? Safety, right? We want solid state because it's perceived as being safer. (could be true). If it's not true than who cares if it's solid state? Let's assume all this to be true.
    They say the liquid is a binder. Don't binders normally dry? If it's liquid, how is it binding? Bottom line; will it hurt me. Isn't that all we really need to know. Torture test time. Stop with the words and start with the actions.

    • @mordant221
      @mordant221 10 минут назад

      Not just for safety, but because they last longer (more cycles) and aren't as affected by either extremes in temperature.

  • @joeyt5168
    @joeyt5168 2 часа назад

    On the lab test documents you need to find the name of an independent lab and then follow up with that lab to verify the test and lab is valid.

  • @YukonHawk1
    @YukonHawk1 3 часа назад +2

    Maybe United Laboratories needs to test and dig into this thing.

    • @bikeny
      @bikeny 2 часа назад

      I'm not trying to be one of those folks, but as I don't know all the standards bodies out there, are you referring to Underwriters Laboratories? And, yes, it would be good for them to check this stuff out.

  • @snowgorilla9789
    @snowgorilla9789 5 минут назад

    The documents they provided do not seem to be google chineezium, so give them a break, nothing that makes power is 100% safe, are they safer than the competion, maybe.
    But they ARE lighter, and for me that is the winning issue

  • @chitacat
    @chitacat 4 часа назад +1

    Your channel is great. Don't need to care about the barking...

  • @andrewt9204
    @andrewt9204 Час назад

    The true test is taking a cell from one of those and put it through a long term cycling test and verifying its degradation.

  • @Leonardokite
    @Leonardokite 3 часа назад

    Thanks for being a watch dog. And I learned something which might not be good LOL, because now I want to go puncture some of my old lithium-ion batteries 🤪🤷‍♂

  • @brettlinton1693
    @brettlinton1693 4 часа назад +1

    I think components under extreme heat can become liquids. Take metal...solid...heat it up...can become liquid. My verdict...Honest Company...

  • @43j832
    @43j832 3 часа назад +1

    It's not solid state in what everyone expected and they knew this. Semi solid state. Hehe. Our learning has to improve and perhaps this another type called Semi Solid. Marketing will always fudge things but I am not sure even they knew totally this was *ify* on definition.

  • @stu-po
    @stu-po Час назад

    They don't seem to be UL rated. I note that other brands are UL rated.

  • @davidjernigan8161
    @davidjernigan8161 2 часа назад

    It should really be referred to as a solid electrolyte battery, not solid state.

  • @_SurferGeek_
    @_SurferGeek_ 13 минут назад

    Intentionally puncturing a battery is the equivalent of tossing a lit match into an ICE fuel tank. Both will achieve the same end results. 😅

  • @Stealther
    @Stealther 4 часа назад

    I don’t see how their email response is any more damning than their claims on their website or their product packaging

  • @miketrissel5494
    @miketrissel5494 2 часа назад

    I don't think you have a leg to stand on. As long as salespeople steal terms that are already being used within an industry, THEY can interpret things anyway THEY want. I've been an electronics-electrician for 50 years, and to me, Solid State means it has no tubes. A PC can be a personal computer, a printed circuit, a programable controller, or a half dozen other things. What authority can you claim, has the right to determine what a 'manufacturer' can use as a descriptive term, on their box? The industry is out of control, and too many governmental arms are reaching into the soup, to claim jurisdiction and control. The cause is lost! OSHA NEMA UL, NEC, all want a piece, and 20 years from now will create 10 more agencies full of double-talk lawyers to protect them from their negligence.
    Solid State Battery ... HAH! Electrolyte free, dry cell

  • @johanslabbert2869
    @johanslabbert2869 4 часа назад +3

    Haha, solid state…
    The record player I grew up with has the words “SOLID STATE” proudly on the front panel, in raised lettering and accented with silver paint. Far more prominent than the manufacturer logo. So much so that for a long time I was convinced solid state was the manufacturer of the device 😂
    This Chinese battery probably qualifies as solid state in the way that some orange juices may be called such as long as it contains mostly orange juice (but also other things)

  • @andreym325
    @andreym325 3 часа назад +1

    Poke the battery! Gosh 😂

  • @wheel1775
    @wheel1775 2 часа назад +1

    Their batteries are probably different enough and close enough to solid state that they can use the term.
    Plus they’re a Chinese company who’s probably not real concerned about lawsuits.

  • @tech-obsessed
    @tech-obsessed 4 часа назад +10

    Why can't you take it apart? Seriously, it's the simplest way to get your answer.
    This video does nothing to answer the actual question, rather it adds to more speculation...

    • @SilverCymbal
      @SilverCymbal  4 часа назад +16

      You can take it apart, sure. Others have and I shared what they found. Problem is, what do you do, taste the powder? smell it? That's the point, it's just a guess. Few situations like this have a single silver bullet answer, I shared what I found and you can decide.

    • @crowmanhusk5644
      @crowmanhusk5644 4 часа назад +3

      It's not that easy to go "that eloctrolyte kinda sorta looks like a liquid". That's not good enough. You need, in writing, a lab analysis and report like shown in this video here. If all of that were fake, then the company would be facing legal consequences.

    • @thefpvlife7785
      @thefpvlife7785 3 часа назад

      We'll leave that up to Will Prowse...lol.

    • @tech-obsessed
      @tech-obsessed 3 часа назад

      @@thefpvlife7785 good idea

    • @Sylvan_dB
      @Sylvan_dB 3 часа назад

      @@crowmanhusk5644 The problem is, the components and materials do not define what is or is not a solid state battery. There are dozens of different combinations in test and development. There is a definition of solid state battery based on the behavior of the elements and compounds in the battery. That definition does not preclude having a flooded battery. There are promised safety benefits of solid state batteries. In my opinion if the battery does not provide those benefits, if it behaves like other lithium-based batteries, then meeting the definition of solid-state is not relevant.

  • @CCWSig
    @CCWSig 2 часа назад +1

    "Solid state battery" really? That's the gimmick we're going with now?

    • @JWill6969
      @JWill6969 44 минуты назад +1

      It's not a gimmick. They could potentially revolutionize battery tech if they are mastered.

  • @mesiroy1234
    @mesiroy1234 Минуту назад

    ‏‪1:02‬‏ lithiu3m make boom
    And thts first time here in chnnale

  • @Talha0067
    @Talha0067 4 часа назад

    nice

  • @partsandlaborgroup
    @partsandlaborgroup 2 часа назад

    You mean Trump.