Game 9 - Post Match Press Conference with Viswanathan Anand and Magnus Carlsen
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 сен 2024
- FIDE World Championship 2013, Game 9 ended with Magnus Carlsen being in the cusp of winning the champion with a 3 point lead over reigning champion Viswanathan Anand and needing only half a point to win.
Both players give their views in the post game press conference.
"Did you calculate these variations to the end, was that even possible?" "No, I was thinking what to eat tonight" - Anand
That was brilliant!
"That explains why you lost LOL"
- Anastasia
@@georgidimitrov3510 dont be mean, it was a dumb question,
it was a sarcastic reply and only Magnus understood and so he smiled a bit.
@@kevinhausch1418 In all fairness to her, her English is not very good. It did not seem she meant it that way.
I am a Carlsen fan.
But the way Mr. Anand reacts after loosing the Chapionship, I like very much.
Mr. Anand is a real Gentlemen!
Best Regards from Germany
P.S.: and he also looks like a very sympathetic person to me.
You're true
Because he is An Indian.. All Indians are like this. 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳.
The lady asks Anand at 05:45 : "So did you try really to calculate all these variations till the end?"
Anand: "No, I was thinking what to eat tonight."
The bitch asked for it.
Anand has really been acting like a spoilt brat and a sore loser throughout the press conferences. There was no need for such sarcasm. Magnus has been much better behaved. Probably having the match in India was the worst thing that could happen to Anand. He just seems irritated by everyone around him
TheWtfness
how mentally stressful it is ... chess can make people mad.. anand is still well behaved
winners are generally well behaved
I am assuming you are a player beyond 1,500. Chess has no luck. To lose to a guy of half his age while playing white is a severe blow to the ego, he did not hide it. I would do the same in his position. I would give a hand and leg to be in his position
Sameer agarwal hey , Anand was the first person to say Carlsen is a great talent . Nakamura, ponomariov and other GM'S of carlsen's age hate him for being too blunt. Go figure.
Most of the commenters underestimate Anastasia. She had to manage where the microphone was, give time to questioners on both sides of the room, cut short questions which were not relevant or even insulting, and allowed the players sufficient time to discuss the crucial variations that did NOT occur on the board. I felt that she was just the right balance of yielding, directing, observing, and organizing. She also had to manage the time and be sensitive to the exhaustion of the players. She juggled all the variables very well and showed great savvy for a young lady.
Somehow Magnus manages to come off as the most humble and mature person in that entire room which is pretty impressive in its own right.
Because he won ..
Anand is a true champion. If carlsen was losing , he would have been unhappy too..and the stupid questions asked after such a loss ,not easy to be cool. He did not slam a door every time the opponent played a good move.
but he wept
The question was whether or not he calculated a certain variation. How is that a stupid question?
Gaud333 not her, others asking abt kasparov and all.
Gaud333 no, she asked if he tried to calculate all these variations while spending so much time (!). Man ofcourse he did try or what he was doing for 40 minutes?
Сергей Сницаренко thinking of curry recipes he said
No I was thinking what to eat tonight... Classic!!
Easily one of the most awkward press conferences i've ever seen.
These are the worst press conference I've seen in my whole life. Extremely unorganized, mostly stupid questions, and I don't know what else. I think Anand, realize that and that's why he answer the way he does some times.
LOL! What you said was honestly funny because I understand your sentiment. However, I don't agree that it's the worst press conference I've ever seen but I don't think it's a good conference either.
I still like the post game analysis. I think the comments from both players were good.
jasonb mraz Yeah! I probably exaggerated a bit with that one. But, seriously such an important event deserves something better. At least is what I think, and probably others do as well.
the players coments are the only thing saving here. Very stupid questions mostly
magnus is explaining his thought process now....which means he is lot of relived...congrats to him and i hope vishy will fight again next year
RESPECT for both players!!!
Karlsen's talent is amazing and undisputed and he happens to be in top form. Anand,is older now,still a great player but happens not to be in good form this time period. He is human and all previous world champions have suffered bad spells. So luck also plays its role in such situations also due to the limited number of games.
It´s Carlsen. Can you make a difference between C and K?? Is it hard??
m5rule
I apologise for my horrendous mistake. :)
stuuuuuupid questions again :-(. A better question would be, why Anand didn't play aggressively right after Game 5? Everybody knows, he CAN play aggressive chess!
Both of these gentlemen are to be commended in how well they handled this circus of a press conference. I have deepest admiration for both men for creating such beautiful chess.
When I started to play chess I was really surprising about the increasing level that is possible to achieve in this sport. In this case, Magnus is maybe the best chessplayer ever, I encourage the people that is dissapointed about Anand performance to reason their arguments and try to understand the games of thus match with a chess computer in order to see the strength of these super grandmasters. Viva México !!!
you lost me at Viva Mexico!!
This game was worthy of World Champion. If Vishy had played like this since the start of the tournament and not tried to draw every game, would have been much better. Not only for chess world, but for him as well.
Possibly true - I think that the match with Gelfand was a dangerous contrast for Anand in that it anticipated little of what was needed for this match. Less thorough prep perhaps, and more imaginative concepts to explore would have seen a closer score.
Vishwanathan Anand has already achieved what he deserved . He is already a five time world chess champion ,so we cannot admonish him. We can just say its Carlsen who played well this time; hence, he has won the matches. We are chess lovers and we just want to see some good chess . Its all about the game not about persons.
It is so obvious, I can't believe people haven't spotted this before - Carlsen is a cyborg!
lol..most of his moves are computer's first choices. You r right.
How is this gold line missed by us 😂
"No, i was thinking what to eat tonight."
The sense of humor 😂
Lmao it's more funny now that Ian is being appreciated for handling the press conference.
Ian only handle it so well cause he never tried, he knew he would lose before it started so when he lost he wasn't as badly affected
Here's what's really funny about everyone's comments: say what you want about Magnus's and Vishy's behavior, blah blah blah, but it has nothing to do with their chess. Who cares about their attitudes, really??? They are incredible chess players and we are privileged to watch them (and anyone critiquing them on this comment board wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell on getting a pawn up on either of them...)
I totally agree. Everyone likes to act like a judge and express their own opinion about them and forgets that these chess greats are human with their own short comings.
I think FIDE is not doing enough to develop real interest in Chess. The post game press conferences are so below par and those journalists... I feel sorry for Anand. Maybe it wasn't such a good idea to play in Chennai. I can imagine the pressure under which he has to play. The weight of the entire nation bears down upon him so much. This shouldn't take anything from Carlsen. He's a super player and he should have been World Champion a long time ago. Great game.
Padre... Been a while, bros
I feel for Vishy here. Devastated to have blundered, lost the game and almost certainly the title. Very rare that he gets annoyed or upset and makes a sarcastic answer.
"I was thinking about how to eat tonight" jjajajaja most funny moment in chess history
yes, a witty put-down from the Champ :) Carlsen looked aghast haha!
TheBirdBrothers I luv Nastja though, she didn't really deserve it - more the wittering journos in the crowd.
Adrián García "I was thinking what to eat tonight".
Why these interveiws at all?????
Damn, Anand needs to learn how to fucking lose. What does he think, that he's going to stay the world champion until the end of time?! I think he's so upset because he's done nothing wrong really. It's just that Magnus is so good. The guy plays like an engine in the endgame.
Carlsen has done an exceptional job in beating Anand..But remember the amount of World champions Anand had and all the years he has been beating everyone else...its just sometimes the age takes over the experience and Carlsen is way too new in this arena the time will tell whether he can do it in the coming years just the way Anand did.
The mouse wasn't working and then the lady asked him a very very stupid question "Where you thinking about all these complicated moves" How stupid is that? It was an apt response from him there. Its got nothing to do with being a bad looser. He played sharp and aggressive the old school chess.
***** He already knows how to win, he's proved it many times. But eventually the time comes when you have to step down.
And yes, it's true that they asked him some really stupid questions. But as a whole his mood seemed really grumpy after his first loss.
It's easy to sit before computer and comment knowing nothing. What Anand is going through, he'll only know. You're fucking nobody to tell how anybody should react to circumstances. Get a life. Play tournaments and see how it's like to lose.
Lol:
"...after the b3 move dod you try to calculate all these moves to the end"
Anand: "No, i was thinking what to eat tonight..."
There was no game where Carlsen was better than Anand. Exception is only game 4, in which however Anand could survive. Anand is just getting old and it is getting harder to play 5 hours for him. All 3 losses are just loss of concentration, but not Carlsen's domination.
Agreed. If this was 2001-2002 it would be an even match. As you stated... Anand after three and a half hours starts to wear now. He blunders now on the four and five hour mark bc most likely he is simply older.. this is what has cost him these games. I feel sorry for him bc Carlsen gets all the media glory and always has. Chess is a younger persons game contrary to common beleif. After 32 your just not what you were at 22,24, 26 ... After 35 your time has passed. You may still be damn strong BUT your not what you once were.
Perfectly said. A truth bomb!
While the well-travelled Vishy seized the centre and organised a strong king-sided attack, Magnus ignored defence and instead ploughed through the queenside with a savoury protected passed pawn. Vish did not realise his kingside attack was spoilt until far too late, and the anaemic Nf1 move gaoled his arse.
okay. enough about Players. I am new to Chess...
Can someone explain why Knight F4 was a blunder.
Vinit Kumar because the queen is attacking the key square where the white rook has to join the white queen
It's quite funny watching these after watching a UFC post fight press conference. Much more tension in here!
No, there really is hahah. After a UFC fight, the fighters are exhausted because they just had their asses kicked..... After loosing a chess game, especially over a fucking miscalc, you're having an adrenaline induced panic attack lmao
What about Ne2 instead of Rf4.. I think Ne2 will give a very decent game to the white pieces and a lot of problems to the black pieces... for example on variation 1 Ne2 b2 Nf4 and I am attacking the d5 pawn... If Be6 NxB and if fxe Ah3 etc..
Come on people, give Anand a break. He blundered massively and knew at that stage that it had cost him the championship. He is completely cross with himself and then has to deal with a bunch of stupid reporters asking stupid questions. You can´t really expect him to show his happy face.
What a stupid question: you spend a lot of time here, are you trying to calculate this to the end?!! No, I was thinking what to eat tonight!!! lol
His answer was funny but we all were wondering why he was spending so much time in that position. Anand was just feeling a bit short and she wasn't very articulate with her question. She recovered well I must say...
Maybe I'm blind but why can't Anand play Queen G7 with protection from pawn?
Anastasia calls Magnus ,mugnus.
Mug
Anand was so rude but what a stupid question. In fact all the press conferences were the same , stupid questions all the time.
Vishy was really rude to the lady. Not very nice for an ex world champion.
I am sure he regretted doing that. He just lost the most important match of his life...give him a break please.
he was totally miffed today, vey unbecoming of him... well chess is stressful,
shobhit todi ya..i guess. Life's not easy.
@@harsha205 you can see he regretted it a few seconds later on his face
Anand dominating chess for long time ??? hahah that made me laugh a lot.. This result did not even surprise me .What the fuck those people talking there? Look at anands last 2 challenger . Topalov and that israeli guy I do not even remember his name.. Carlsen should have been challenger long ago and would be still same results as now...
so kramnik and topalov are suckers?? are you on drugs???
Somebody give timestamp for witty comment
" you dominated the world # 1 for 26 moves" no, carlsen was still alive with counterplay
Don't mess with an Indian.chess is a gift of india,remember.
Boom goes the dynamite!
5:47
Best chess game
"Lasker once said: never move the pawns in front of your castle king 🤴 why you do that!! 🤨"- random indian nobody to World Chess Champion 🤣🤣🤣🤣
wow!!! Anand is really pissed!!!! "NO I WAS THINK OF WHAT TO EAT TONIGHT!!!!!" THAT WAS RUDE !!!!
Why choose a person to lead the press conference with such poor english??
poor english is better than poor chess knowledge.
My question would rather be, who chooses those journalists that get to ask all those stupid questions? Sounds like those guys normally report football matches, or Willilam & Kate. Lol.
methinks there are more jerks per capita as so called chess fans as there are jerks in most other sports alas
What the!! He memorize his moves or what😅
what do you think he was thinking to eat for dinner?
he lost 3 games which he should have drawn, he has a right to be angry. Sambar-rice.
@@harsha205 nah biryani
he was thinking about bacon for sure, he was like "enough of this vegentarian crap, time for some sizzling meat."
Why he blocked with his knight I will never know. What a huge blunder.
u r right, but it's so complicated with so less time. We have computers to watch all the lines.
It was not a blunder... Listen to Carlsen's explanation 3:30 - There was no winning continuation after 28. Bf1 move, all the variations were leading to draw. However, the 28. Nf1 move had a little chance for Anand had Carlsen played 28.. Bg4 or 28.. Qd1. Moreover Anand was in do or die situation. He knew that a draw is of no use, so he took his chances and made that move, but still credit to Carlsen who didn't loose his nerves and chose what was best.
Banking on the other player to make a bad move doesn't justify your decision. Qe1 was just so obvious. Anytime you have other option which could lead to equal positions but choosing a clearly bad move which forces you to resign immediately, it is a blunder in my books. 28. Nf1??
Aditya Sharma But Ne1 just looses on the spot, when there were other continuations to keep the game alive (namely Be1) and maybe hope for a draw or something. And that is the definition of a blunder
Ignacio de la Puente
As I said Anand was not playing for draw. Anand himself said that draw was no option for him in this game.
Anand wanted a win and at move 28 the only possibility was Nf1 as it involved complex continuations which might had puzzled carlsen.
Todd? Is that you?
Actually he was really similar
who is this girl?
Anastasiya Karlovich, a Ukrainian chess player and journalist.
anand looks sad :/, carlsen deserves the win though. great game
To bad Vis wears that rug
ahh yeahhh..
The only surprise in this tournament is that Carlsen is not winning by more.
awkwarrrrrrrrrrrd ............
Who also think Carlsen will win again tomorrow?
He'll probably be playing as defensive as possible for the draw.
FlunkedMath He supposed have done it today, and look what the score was.
Carlson is lying
The Pakistani guy looks humiliated...
Why was Vishy so rude to that girl???.... was it in humor or sarcasm??.. nevertheless we have a new world champion and lets get back to work