I don't know how this isn't at 1000 already! All kinds of magic is created using math. Most optical illusions are as well. Math would've been a lot more fun in school if I'd known this back then...
A nice geometric "puzzle". As he adds each piece, the area increases slightly, but is spread across the whole square per se. The more pieces he adds, the smaller the gap between each piece is, so there is a difference, but it's hard to see with the naked eye. That being said, he adds a fun little misdirection at the end. You'll notice he only shakes the square at the end because if he did that before, when the area was smaller, the spectator might notice that it shakes ever so slightly due to the gaps. TL;DR The pieces don't initially fill the whole black frame perfectly. The pieces add more area until it finally closes the gap between all pieces.
Initially there's some space between pieces. As he adds more pieces everything is more tightly packed. Still cool that someone made an actual puzzle out of the chocolate bar trick picture from so many years ago
When you add another piece the area of the rectangle changes but its width remains the same, so every time you add one piece the height of the rectangle slightly increases. The first time you tryt o fit it into the frame its not as tight as the last time you do it.
The reason is the I have noticed the initial set has a bit of gaps that is not easily seen. Adding and rearranging the piece only serve to close those gaps.
The top piece always remains where it is. It slighlty moves left or right. The top piece is full width of rectange so it always aligns with rest. As for the height because of the angle of top piece and some other pieces, when moved space is created ...i dont really know how to explain
I think they are arranged so that the rectangle with 5 pieces has some vertical wiggle room, and the rest fit in such a way that it takes up the remaining space evenly, thus creating the illusion.
Its like that unlimited chocolate thing. It gets bigger but not drastically, only a little throughout the sides. As for the frame, the black part goes over the part of the puzzle that extends out.
its the frame, you can see when its first in the box there's a lot of wiggle room, by the end there is not wiggle room. the frame had indentations, hence why the edge of the puzzles glow because they are thinner on the side to slide under the frame
Simple. There is just space between the pieces at the start. It doesn’t seem like much but it is enough to add 2 more pieces spread out through the pieces. You can tell it’s more compact at the end.
There was more space before he added more pieces into the frame, as you can tell in the beginning he was able to take them out with his fingers which proves that there is some sort of space in between the figure and the frame. The added figures add to the area so slightly it can barely be seen by just the naked eye.
The frame is a bit wider in the inside PLUS some area is added in the shape of a gap between the pieces, unnoticeable because of the lighter colour of the edges. Also in the last moment he shakes it and no sound is heard but at the begginning you can clearly hear some sounds. Both tricks+performance add up.
Lord Alexstrasza it's physically impossible that the size stays the same (exept if you compress it or the height somehow increases so the frame fits). I hope you don't think that the size actually stays the same, it IS the same principal like with the chocolate bar, when the shape is in the frame there is slightly more space than needed, but when the first piece is added its area is evenly divided along the sides and the slight excess gets filled. Same for the second piece.
"it's physically impossible that the size stays the same" Oh really... I was talking about how this trick shows that is the same size while it's obvious that is getting smaller on the one with chocolate. So the trick here is that it looks to be the same size, while the other isn't really a trick at all
It's the same trick He's done that reversed and 2 consecutive times In the last "dimension check" the rectangle fits perfectly, you'll notice he takes a few correction to center the black piece. You don't notice sostancial differences of area because he was adding small ammounts of area, in a ideal 3rd or 4th additional area the black piece will be too small
I think it's a combination of two tricks, the firs one is that in the box everything looks neat, because the edges of the square are not seen and I think you can move the lower part a bit to make it look better. The second trick is that the space from top to bottom gets more with each piece and because of that he has to leave little gaps inbetween some pieces. He only moves it around in the end, and that is because we are meant to believe that the first step is a little one and the actual trick comes in from the second to the third one, so we overlook the second image, which actually is the one with the secret hidden inside itself.
This is pretty easy, the three squares might fit in the frame but they have actually different sizes. Only the third one, the last you put together, seems to fit perfectly in the frame, while the first two don't. That's why, at the beginning of the puzzle, you could take the parts off the frame from up, instead of having to remove the frame.
This was so cool I ordered one lol. I made one out of cardboard first and tried it, when It worked I ordered one, I'm a mechanical engineer and part-time math tutor so I a sucker for this kind of stuff, just love it lol.
This is Pythagoras theorem. :) this works because the long triangle at the end always have some space (gap above) I think it’s tiny but enough. You could do this with paper and if you think about it, you could also do this with a chessboard
This is a new take on a very old trick. There are small variances in the first puzzle which are filled in by the second piece. There are then still small variances in the second puzzle, filled in by the third piece. The variances all average out along the piece edges so it looks like each complete puzzle is exactly the same size. But they are slightly different.
Notice that when he removes the first piece, he moves it down enough to get his finger on the edge. By the time he adds the other two pieces, that space is gone.
Neat. There is no space /between/ the pieces. The angles all match just like they look. All the wiggle room is in the width of the rectangle. Say the added pieces are 7x7 and 7x14, and the top piece's side lengths are left 7, top 49, right 21. Then the 5 pieces make a 49x32 box; 6 make a 49x33; 7 make a 49x35. The frame hides a bit of the pieces and conceals the fact that the rectangle is getting wider and wider and that the frame conceals more and more of it.
The explanation is pretty simple, if your brain stops trying to 'think' that you're fitting the frame into each new shape-group. What is happening is actually (and you know it ;) ) the frame, at each new slightly bigger group-shape, is eating away part of the outline ( area) of the group.
Its like that unlimited chocolate thing. It gets bigger but not drastically, only a little throughout the sides. As for the frame, the black part goes over the part of the puzzle that extends out.
This is like the chocolate bar that you can cut up and eat one piece and put the remaining pieces back together to make the full chocolate bar again. The pieces are all a little bit smaller but still seem to look like they fit. There are wooden versions of this puzzle by TCC for sale online as well. This is a more affordable puzzle because the wooden puzzle that costs $92.
I suppose the angle of the camera would give us the illusion that the 1st whole puzzle is tightly arranged but if we view it on a top perspective, its not. Thera are gaps in it.
The way the puzzle was taken out at the beginning (NOT using the half-moon finger depression in the black frame) tipped me off. If the puzzle WAS flush against the frame at the beginning, it would be impossible to remove without using that finger depression. After the 2 "extra" pieces are added, the puzzle is so flush against the frame, it would have to be taken out using the finger depression. As another commenter noted, the pink color provides a distraction, but compare the neon sides so visible at the beginning when the puzzle is unboxed and how you barely see them at the end of the video. Very nice puzzle!
First one has slight space near the sides of the frame (the little square worth of space all arround) the second, when added the little squre fits perfectly, third one doesent fit, the frame lies on top of it and hides sertain ammount of the pink rectangle
Only the width remains (x axis) equal, the height (y axis) varies with each added piece. The pink pieces are thick and their edges are angled (ie. not 90° but a little slanted), these angles take away some of the surface gain. It would probably not work if you put the pieces together in another way, because the angles of the pieces' edges wouldn't work together. In the second configuration you can see that the pink pieces reach through the frame (z axis), in the last config the frame sits on the pieces, they don't extend out. Why am I suddenly hungry for chocolate?
If it isn't a trick frame than I have the belief that it's due to the change in elevation arranging the rectangle pieces. Such as using the first new piece to move the center frame lower and moving the top piece to the side. Same with the second new piece which simply places that declining slope to its original position and once again rearranging the top piece which ensures a fitted frame.
To make this trick more interesting, you can label each peace like it are rooms of a floor plan for your new house. This idea comes from a RUclips video I've seen last year. Edit: this video: ruclips.net/video/KMILs2lAk7c/видео.html
simply there is a little high comes when adding the first Piece. That high is = the square meter of the added Piece divided on the Width of the shape. for example: if the square meter of the first added Piece is 2*2=4 cm and Width of the shape is 20cm So the new high is: 4/20 = 0.2 cm you cant notice that added high by your eyes Same idea for the second Piece
Basically the area gets larger, but the fact that we don't see it gets large is because the gaps are getting smaller, you can look and compare all 3 and u can see the white area are getting smaller
Jack Clayton math? Adding area creates a larger perimeter. There is no 'math' trick that could keep that surface the same size. Originally he removed the bits from the top of the frame. After adding bits they no longer are able to fit through the top of the frame.
It's math. The frame doesnt fit Closely/neat in the frame. there are a few mm off as you can see in 1:38 of the video he moves the frame and on top/bot there are a few mm of a gap. The moment he "recreates" the triangle all he adds is this few mm's as this little pieces arent that much to the whole area. this my friend is math, if i knew the exact Dimensions i could recreate all of that in a calculation and you'd exactly see that at the start the recangle in the frame isnt as large as the inside of the frame itself. ^^ Edit: There is such a very old trick you do with choclate were you eat one piece and it stays the "same size" but it just looks like it... ^^
Lord Dice X I don't think you know math. First of all, circumference is terminology applied to a curved geometric figure, not a square. Secondly, it really is simple. The pieces have a slight gap between them. Add more pieces and the gap closes, as area is distributed throughout the square.
Cesar Pinto if you mean me, thats what i meant but im very bad in describing things and also english isnt my main language so this fucks it up even more i guess. But the way you said it sounds right and short... exactly what i meant tbh :'D
Have been looking for this a couple of hours after seeing this on instagram and arguing with this guy about it being all about using the total area of the space and this guy cannot get over the fact it’s possible swearing the frames are different. I swear I seen one of these when I was just a child like 50 years ago
Very old but very effective "illusion". Even knowing the answer i still was not convinced. This version add 2 pieces and that's new for me. I would love to have one of this in my hand and make some closer observations.
Vsauce has a video on something like this but in reverse and with a candy bar....the area is spread over the whole of the rectangle so it be difficult to see the difference
I assume the puzzle was 6 inches by 5 inches then the perimeter would be 22 inches. If the first cube which looks to be 1/2 × 1/2 inches were cut into slivers to go around the perimeter it would have to be cut into 44 separate pieces. This would mean each sliver would only be .01 inches thick which is really really thin. If the other piece which looks to be 2 x 5/8 inches. It would need to be cut into 11 slivers and each sliver would be only .056 thick which is still really thin. So neither piece would actually add a substantial amount of width to the puzzle.
The inclinations of trapezoid should be diffferent I mean this thing should have 2 inclinations in it that are too close numerically an that makes the eye illusion =l
I came to see how it really works because it almost made me cry :D I know nothing but I love this neon pink version! Calms be down a bit. I still dont get it, thought.
there are gaps between the pieces when the rectangle is only 5 pieces. they are hard to see because of the angle at which the video is shot. the area of the 6th piece is less than the combined area of those gaps before he adds it. there are still gaps between the pieces when the 6th piece is in place. the 7th piece is roughly the same area as the remaining combined area of the gaps. if you had a better angle of the assembly, you would see that the pieces have an increasingly tighter fit within the frame as they are added.
I didn't watch until the end, but let me guess after 1min of thought.. The tolerance of fit is where it is, you can not add more surface area without increasing its size. But a small piece like that, well you could have 1mm of clearance around the original puzzel, and now you add the piece it's a tighter fit of the frame, probably .5mm now So am I right..
The biggest piece is the key, this is the same as the reappearing chocolate trick, search that up and you'll see how it's done cos I can't explain it well enough 😂😂
Sure the match is perfect only on the end and not at the start and even not after first pieces is added and. If small square has side equal to about 1/5 of height and 1/10 of width than the area of the square is about 1/50 of the area of initial rectangle or 2 percent. To increase area of a rectangle (A=w h), where w and h are width and height of initial rectangle, by 2 percent, you could for example increase width w for 1 percent and height h for 1 percent, because for small increase the relative increase of the product of two factors or area A is approximately equal to sum of increases of both factors (delta A/A = delta w/w '+ delta h/h). But in this puzzle width was not changed so the relative change in height must be equal to relative increase of area (delta A/A = delta h/h, in this case the formula is exact). So the increase of height was about 2 percent for the first addition. He than adds another bigger piece rectangular in shape which has maybe 4 percent of area of the big rectangle. In this case he also changes only the height which must be for about 4 percent. Only now the frame really fits perfectly.
Each piece added adds a fractionally small amount to the height, making it seem like it always fits. The height of the frame is originally slightly more than that of the pieces, but not noticeably so. Then adding the pieces makes it fit snugly. Here is a video explanation: ruclips.net/video/ltqHJTY8Fhk/видео.html
I don't trust the frame. It appears the way the pieces get installed the frame increases in size slightly from top to bottom by sliding. I think the frame is the key in my opinion. Could be wrong. Would like to have one of these in my possession to examine.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Here's a mystifying puzzle to ponder over. Happy Friday everyone!
I have loved this trick for so long it is cool to see it like this
52Kards, get ready, 1000 likes reached in about 2 hours.
I don't know how this isn't at 1000 already! All kinds of magic is created using math. Most optical illusions are as well. Math would've been a lot more fun in school if I'd known this back then...
david lindsay , good one , optical illusion
What is it called
A nice geometric "puzzle". As he adds each piece, the area increases slightly, but is spread across the whole square per se. The more pieces he adds, the smaller the gap between each piece is, so there is a difference, but it's hard to see with the naked eye. That being said, he adds a fun little misdirection at the end. You'll notice he only shakes the square at the end because if he did that before, when the area was smaller, the spectator might notice that it shakes ever so slightly due to the gaps.
TL;DR The pieces don't initially fill the whole black frame perfectly. The pieces add more area until it finally closes the gap between all pieces.
It is. Look at 1:45 you can clearly see that there is space between the frame and the puzzle
Corey Lambrecht Saying "no it's not" isn't really an argument. Please elaborate.
This is an old ass puzzle, you need to measure the area precisely and you’ll see the increase.
Also, the neon pink color is probably for making harder to see the initial gaps with the naked eye.(as the sides have that blurry/glossy appearance)
Eren Eralp Good thinking there.
Initially there's some space between pieces. As he adds more pieces everything is more tightly packed. Still cool that someone made an actual puzzle out of the chocolate bar trick picture from so many years ago
When you add another piece the area of the rectangle changes but its width remains the same, so every time you add one piece the height of the rectangle slightly increases. The first time you tryt o fit it into the frame its not as tight as the last time you do it.
The reason is the I have noticed the initial set has a bit of gaps that is not easily seen. Adding and rearranging the piece only serve to close those gaps.
The top piece always remains where it is. It slighlty moves left or right. The top piece is full width of rectange so it always aligns with rest. As for the height because of the angle of top piece and some other pieces, when moved space is created ...i dont really know how to explain
I think they are arranged so that the rectangle with 5 pieces has some vertical wiggle room, and the rest fit in such a way that it takes up the remaining space evenly, thus creating the illusion.
HyPezZ yes i kinda agree. The illusion is created because of the angles in the shape.
Its like that unlimited chocolate thing. It gets bigger but not drastically, only a little throughout the sides. As for the frame, the black part goes over the part of the puzzle that extends out.
its the frame, you can see when its first in the box there's a lot of wiggle room, by the end there is not wiggle room. the frame had indentations, hence why the edge of the puzzles glow because they are thinner on the side to slide under the frame
HP Guy Exactly, it doesn't hurt the brain, it's so simple
Simple. There is just space between the pieces at the start. It doesn’t seem like much but it is enough to add 2 more pieces spread out through the pieces. You can tell it’s more compact at the end.
There was more space before he added more pieces into the frame, as you can tell in the beginning he was able to take them out with his fingers which proves that there is some sort of space in between the figure and the frame. The added figures add to the area so slightly it can barely be seen by just the naked eye.
There are heaps of these videos.
And yours is the best.
The frame is a bit wider in the inside PLUS some area is added in the shape of a gap between the pieces, unnoticeable because of the lighter colour of the edges. Also in the last moment he shakes it and no sound is heard but at the begginning you can clearly hear some sounds. Both tricks+performance add up.
This is like this infinite chocolate trick!
Cubi Cardi it's not the same the trick here is that the size remains the same, when adding pieces. In the chocolate is actually gets smaller
Lord Alexstrasza it's physically impossible that the size stays the same (exept if you compress it or the height somehow increases so the frame fits). I hope you don't think that the size actually stays the same, it IS the same principal like with the chocolate bar, when the shape is in the frame there is slightly more space than needed, but when the first piece is added its area is evenly divided along the sides and the slight excess gets filled. Same for the second piece.
"it's physically impossible that the size stays the same"
Oh really...
I was talking about how this trick shows that is the same size while it's obvious that is getting smaller on the one with chocolate. So the trick here is that it looks to be the same size, while the other isn't really a trick at all
Cubi Cardi yesssss!!!! me too i remembered it
It's the same trick
He's done that reversed and 2 consecutive times
In the last "dimension check" the rectangle fits perfectly, you'll notice he takes a few correction to center the black piece. You don't notice sostancial differences of area because he was adding small ammounts of area, in a ideal 3rd or 4th additional area the black piece will be too small
I think it's a combination of two tricks, the firs one is that in the box everything looks neat, because the edges of the square are not seen and I think you can move the lower part a bit to make it look better. The second trick is that the space from top to bottom gets more with each piece and because of that he has to leave little gaps inbetween some pieces. He only moves it around in the end, and that is because we are meant to believe that the first step is a little one and the actual trick comes in from the second to the third one, so we overlook the second image, which actually is the one with the secret hidden inside itself.
This is pretty easy, the three squares might fit in the frame but they have actually different sizes. Only the third one, the last you put together, seems to fit perfectly in the frame, while the first two don't. That's why, at the beginning of the puzzle, you could take the parts off the frame from up, instead of having to remove the frame.
This was so cool I ordered one lol. I made one out of cardboard first and tried it, when It worked I ordered one, I'm a mechanical engineer and part-time math tutor so I a sucker for this kind of stuff, just love it lol.
Enjoy! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_square_puzzle
where did you bought the puzzle?
Want the same answer
This is Pythagoras theorem. :) this works because the long triangle at the end always have some space (gap above) I think it’s tiny but enough. You could do this with paper and if you think about it, you could also do this with a chessboard
This is a new take on a very old trick. There are small variances in the first puzzle which are filled in by the second piece. There are then still small variances in the second puzzle, filled in by the third piece. The variances all average out along the piece edges so it looks like each complete puzzle is exactly the same size. But they are slightly different.
Its great to see people so puzzled about this in the comments 😉
Notice that when he removes the first piece, he moves it down enough to get his finger on the edge. By the time he adds the other two pieces, that space is gone.
the video is real lol, initially it doesn't fit perfectly i'ts a camera trick
Neat. There is no space /between/ the pieces. The angles all match just like they look. All the wiggle room is in the width of the rectangle. Say the added pieces are 7x7 and 7x14, and the top piece's side lengths are left 7, top 49, right 21. Then the 5 pieces make a 49x32 box; 6 make a 49x33; 7 make a 49x35. The frame hides a bit of the pieces and conceals the fact that the rectangle is getting wider and wider and that the frame conceals more and more of it.
The explanation is pretty simple, if your brain stops trying to 'think' that you're fitting the frame into each new shape-group. What is happening is actually (and you know it ;) ) the frame, at each new slightly bigger group-shape, is eating away part of the outline ( area) of the group.
Its like that unlimited chocolate thing. It gets bigger but not drastically, only a little throughout the sides. As for the frame, the black part goes over the part of the puzzle that extends out.
This is like the chocolate bar that you can cut up and eat one piece and put the remaining pieces back together to make the full chocolate bar again. The pieces are all a little bit smaller but still seem to look like they fit. There are wooden versions of this puzzle by TCC for sale online as well. This is a more affordable puzzle because the wooden puzzle that costs $92.
I suppose the angle of the camera would give us the illusion that the 1st whole puzzle is tightly arranged but if we view it on a top perspective, its not. Thera are gaps in it.
The way the puzzle was taken out at the beginning (NOT using the half-moon finger depression in the black frame) tipped me off. If the puzzle WAS flush against the frame at the beginning, it would be impossible to remove without using that finger depression. After the 2 "extra" pieces are added, the puzzle is so flush against the frame, it would have to be taken out using the finger depression. As another commenter noted, the pink color provides a distraction, but compare the neon sides so visible at the beginning when the puzzle is unboxed and how you barely see them at the end of the video. Very nice puzzle!
First one has slight space near the sides of the frame (the little square worth of space all arround) the second, when added the little squre fits perfectly, third one doesent fit, the frame lies on top of it and hides sertain ammount of the pink rectangle
what he said, if you look closely at the last part the frame is on top
Sertain
Only the width remains (x axis) equal, the height (y axis) varies with each added piece. The pink pieces are thick and their edges are angled (ie. not 90° but a little slanted), these angles take away some of the surface gain. It would probably not work if you put the pieces together in another way, because the angles of the pieces' edges wouldn't work together. In the second configuration you can see that the pink pieces reach through the frame (z axis), in the last config the frame sits on the pieces, they don't extend out.
Why am I suddenly hungry for chocolate?
Since the base is the same the high changes not a lot so it can fit in the frame again
Loved this video! I really like the new changes you've made to the channel and I'm really enjoying it! Keep up the good work❤️
Thats genius, it is slightly loose in between pieces, but adding peices only increase the night, but ever so slightly. That's amazing.
If it isn't a trick frame than I have the belief that it's due to the change in elevation arranging the rectangle pieces. Such as using the first new piece to move the center frame lower and moving the top piece to the side. Same with the second new piece which simply places that declining slope to its original position and once again rearranging the top piece which ensures a fitted frame.
To make this trick more interesting, you can label each peace like it are rooms of a floor plan for your new house. This idea comes from a RUclips video I've seen last year. Edit: this video: ruclips.net/video/KMILs2lAk7c/видео.html
hi any specific measurement of each shape?
Where can I get it
Great videos and I love Chris Ramsay’s puzzle videos I like that you are doing puzzles now
Quite similar to, but I guess a little different from the classic Winston Freer tile puzzle. I want one of those...
simply there is a little high comes when adding the first Piece.
That high is = the square meter of the added Piece divided on the Width of the shape.
for example:
if the square meter of the first added Piece is 2*2=4 cm
and Width of the shape is 20cm
So the new high is: 4/20 = 0.2 cm
you cant notice that added high by your eyes
Same idea for the second Piece
Love your vids man!
Pls mention dimensions of the blocks
Basically the area gets larger, but the fact that we don't see it gets large is because the gaps are getting smaller, you can look and compare all 3 and u can see the white area are getting smaller
can somebody PLZ tell me the name of that puzzle you know what fuq it ill just look it up on google
The top aperture is smaller than the underside of the frame
Lord Dice X No it's math, nothing is hidden behind that frame
Jack Clayton math? Adding area creates a larger perimeter. There is no 'math' trick that could keep that surface the same size. Originally he removed the bits from the top of the frame. After adding bits they no longer are able to fit through the top of the frame.
It's math. The frame doesnt fit Closely/neat in the frame. there are a few mm off as you can see in 1:38 of the video he moves the frame and on top/bot there are a few mm of a gap.
The moment he "recreates" the triangle all he adds is this few mm's as this little pieces arent that much to the whole area. this my friend is math, if i knew the exact Dimensions i could recreate all of that in a calculation and you'd exactly see that at the start the recangle in the frame isnt as large as the inside of the frame itself. ^^
Edit: There is such a very old trick you do with choclate were you eat one piece and it stays the "same size" but it just looks like it... ^^
Lord Dice X I don't think you know math. First of all, circumference is terminology applied to a curved geometric figure, not a square. Secondly, it really is simple. The pieces have a slight gap between them. Add more pieces and the gap closes, as area is distributed throughout the square.
Cesar Pinto if you mean me, thats what i meant but im very bad in describing things and also english isnt my main language so this fucks it up even more i guess. But the way you said it sounds right and short... exactly what i meant tbh :'D
Man that’s such mind blowing trick! Will definitely get one some day ✌️👌
Have been looking for this a couple of hours after seeing this on instagram and arguing with this guy about it being all about using the total area of the space and this guy cannot get over the fact it’s possible swearing the frames are different. I swear I seen one of these when I was just a child like 50 years ago
How to make ( cut ) this puzzle pieces
Yeah, anyone..share the knowledge please
Very old but very effective "illusion". Even knowing the answer i still was not convinced. This version add 2 pieces and that's new for me. I would love to have one of this in my hand and make some closer observations.
If u move everything over then it will retake shape by moving the pieces, kinda like the infinite chocolate bar
Wish you would show the movement taking the pieces out, back to the original pieces.
Vsauce has a video on something like this but in reverse and with a candy bar....the area is spread over the whole of the rectangle so it be difficult to see the difference
I assume the puzzle was 6 inches by 5 inches then the perimeter would be 22 inches. If the first cube which looks to be 1/2 × 1/2 inches were cut into slivers to go around the perimeter it would have to be cut into 44 separate pieces. This would mean each sliver would only be .01 inches thick which is really really thin. If the other piece which looks to be 2 x 5/8 inches. It would need to be cut into 11 slivers and each sliver would be only .056 thick which is still really thin. So neither piece would actually add a substantial amount of width to the puzzle.
Hey can u do the thumb around pen trick. Your last video was kinda hard to understand
I can do the pen around thumb trick but the thumb around pen? Sounds painful!
It’s the the the reason thing you can do with a chocolate bar. The certain way you cut it can just be put back into a rectangle again
What is the product name?
Litteraly trying to find the same thing!
Great video liked it.Big 52kards and Chris Ramsay fan.
The inclinations of trapezoid should be diffferent I mean this thing should have 2 inclinations in it that are too close numerically an that makes the eye illusion =l
cool shapes asad!
What is it called and where can we buy this?
Check the description box ✌🏼
Very cool Puzzle 😎👍
1:39 You can literally see him move the frame and no peices move(not snug) but at the end he moves it and it all moves together snug.
Yeah...basically the overall size of the rectangle is growing...ofcourse unnoticeably..and that extra size gets hid behind the black frame
When are you going to bring back mint deck?
My brain is already hurting 😅😂😂😂
Can you do this trick in reverse? Even with the frame?
Оn 0:38 sec he moved the black frame towards camera , that's the easiest trick so the black frame is moveable.
The trick is the hypotenuse of the triangle the way its moved
this reminds me of the banarch tarski paradox. I guessing its loosely based on that principle...just a wild thought
The real magic trick is that he never made the follow-up video. Poof. Disappear. Magic. Not even an illusion!
Brilliant fantastic puzzle I've ever seen.
I came to see how it really works because it almost made me cry :D I know nothing but I love this neon pink version! Calms be down a bit. I still dont get it, thought.
there are gaps between the pieces when the rectangle is only 5 pieces. they are hard to see because of the angle at which the video is shot. the area of the 6th piece is less than the combined area of those gaps before he adds it. there are still gaps between the pieces when the 6th piece is in place. the 7th piece is roughly the same area as the remaining combined area of the gaps. if you had a better angle of the assembly, you would see that the pieces have an increasingly tighter fit within the frame as they are added.
It’s cuz when you move the pieces, area is lost, and that little square is about the size of the missing area. Hard to explain
I didn't watch until the end, but let me guess after 1min of thought..
The tolerance of fit is where it is, you can not add more surface area without increasing its size.
But a small piece like that, well you could have 1mm of clearance around the original puzzel, and now you add the piece it's a tighter fit of the frame, probably .5mm now
So am I right..
I wish Asad was able to see my face while he preformed this. He might enjoyed my reaction.
The biggest piece is the key, this is the same as the reappearing chocolate trick, search that up and you'll see how it's done cos I can't explain it well enough 😂😂
Sure the match is perfect only on the end and not at the start and even not after first pieces is added and. If small square has side equal to about 1/5 of height and 1/10 of width than the area of the square is about 1/50 of the area of initial rectangle or 2 percent.
To increase area of a rectangle (A=w h), where w and h are width and height of initial rectangle, by 2 percent, you could for example increase width w for 1 percent and height h for 1 percent, because for small increase the relative increase of the product of two factors or area A is approximately equal to sum of increases of both factors (delta A/A = delta w/w '+ delta h/h).
But in this puzzle width was not changed so the relative change in height must be equal to relative increase of area (delta A/A = delta h/h, in this case the formula is exact). So the increase of height was about 2 percent for the first addition. He than adds another bigger piece rectangular in shape which has maybe 4 percent of area of the big rectangle. In this case he also changes only the height which must be for about 4 percent. Only now the frame really fits perfectly.
Each piece added adds a fractionally small amount to the height, making it seem like it always fits. The height of the frame is originally slightly more than that of the pieces, but not noticeably so. Then adding the pieces makes it fit snugly. Here is a video explanation: ruclips.net/video/ltqHJTY8Fhk/видео.html
So cool! :D
I don't trust the frame. It appears the way the pieces get installed the frame increases in size slightly from top to bottom by sliding. I think the frame is the key in my opinion. Could be wrong. Would like to have one of these in my possession to examine.
You see that the frame is bigger than the pieces with no extra pieces
Cause of the laws of motion
Damn that’s super cool
-HEY, VSAUCE!!
It kind of looks like the infinity chocolate case
Wow this is cool
And as always... Thanks for watching
Lol, even when you understand how it works it hurts your brain
1:32 si the black part cutting ;O)
This is like the chocolate life hack videos
Who is the creator of this trick?
This is ultimate Tetris
MY DAD GAVE ME THIS AND I COULDNT FIGURE IT OUT!! (my dad made it with cardboard
Imal balkanaca?Mislim da znam kak ovo radii
Can you think of making this game?
Asad are you here can you please send greeting to Turkey ? Like your vid ;)
Chest hair? Lol
Just like "infinite chocolate"
It's the same principal as the chocolate bar
Math is math, never become a magic...
Well it's the same thing as the missing chocolate puzzle.
Hey, here’s a riddle.
There is a blue man in the blue house, a red man in the red house, Who’s in the White House?
idk Biden?
Legit magic