The supervisor that called me back pretty much let me know if I told one of the office to screw themself we would see what happens. Sounds like a threat to me.
Wonder if the ADA would help??? NEVER judge people before you know them…this man is a true warrior and has already fought a war inside his own body and WON. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
The camera only catches, I am the law, Do as i say, Obey or go to jail. It certainly doesn't stop it. Here is a Perfect example of rights violation & property damage.
@@weequarter… Sadly, you are 100% correct. But crucial video evidence of this nature - which provides daily proof to the entire world that American cops might be the dumbest, most poorly trained “law enforcers” in the world, is VITAL in the quest for fairness and a chance to regain some semblance of balance within the Justice System…
Sadly, I have to disagree with you. It has not ended, as just shown. I think they said this was in Georgia, but it is not as bad up there as it is down here in FL, the victim is still alive. I used to think that only 10% of LEOs were bad, after seeing stuff like this I think it is much closer to 50% with another 30% willing to not say anything to correct them.
And that is what bothers these types of police officers the most. In the past they were able to act with impunity, and more than likely did not have to do a lot of fishing because they simply said ex person did this, and it stuck, the individuals had no recourse because they didn't have anything recorded. Now there's body cam footage and individuals personal phone are having a hard time hiding behind their poor policing. So l, restart the fish, they start to take any words you say twist that into obstruction. I would venture that 95% of these issues with police officers are retaliation for a person recording and then using their constitutional rights a shield against tyranny.
Help this gentleman file his formal complaint and File that lawsuit against all parties involved. I believe his 4th amendment rights were violated. Plus he cannot trespassed if he has left the property. They do not know the law. And he does not have to help them in their investigation. 5th amendment of the constitution.
He can be trespassed. He just can't be charged with trespassing or be forced to ID. But in any case, these cops don't know how to practice law enforcement properly. In any other occupation they would be fired.
Yep. As a retired LEO, they had no right to remove him from his location. That literally was kidnapping under color of law. 10 years in fderal prison if prosecut3d.
@@ned6938 The vast majority of prosecutors and judges are elected. But the voters know almost nothing about what the judges and prosecutors actually do in court. And the judges keep it that way by illegally prohibiting recording in the courts, even though everyone knows that is a constitutional right. Since the voters know nothing about the corrupt officials, whether they get elected comes down to a popularity contest. And how do they win that contest? Avoid pissing off the biggest player (the cops union).
Normal cop believes that the 5th amendment is a crime called, "obstructing" except when he uses it. Why are you detaining me? Answer: I have the right to remain silent. Profound stupidity is the rule, not the exception.
I don't think that he believes that not answering questions is obstruction I think he was just trying to bluff the guy because if he truly believed it he would have arrested him for obstruction. He has most likely done this many times and people that have no clue what to law is will begin to sing like a canary.
Providing the police with false or misleading information may constitute obstruction. Refusing to provide them with any information does not. You are under no obligation to assist the police in their investigations.
He had standing for a 4th amendment violation as soon as he submitted to their assertion of authority without them having the legal justification for the seizure.
No , the law cannot take people back to a property to solicit a trespass. You must be caught on the property when the cops arrive. If he left the property after being told to there's no trespass and the cops seeing him off property is even more proof to such.
He wasn’t charged with trespassing he got a criminal trespass warning which means if he got back to the location again he is subject to being charged we don’t know what the original call came out as but the cops were not called for no reason so they had every right to Stop him to further investigate the stop
Learn to say “I invoke my 1st 4th 5th and 6th Amendment rights” then remain silent. If he asked another question you tell him he just violated my civil rights by asking a question without my legal representation.
Sorry but that isn't actually how it works. They can keep asking you questions if they want, but if you invoke your 5th AND say you want lawyer present for questioning, then they can run into trouble using what you said against you and a good lawyer can get it suppressed. But you won't have any luck trying to sue over them continuing to question you. You can name all the amendments if you want, but they all have different uses. As rage against the machine said, make a move and plead the 5th cause you can't plead the 1st.
SCOTUS caselaw with some relevant facts to your query. Hayes v. Florida, 470 U.S. 811 (1985) From the holding " Where there was no probable cause to arrest petitioner, no consent to the journey...no prior judicial authorization for detaining him, the investigative detention at the station for fingerprinting purposes violated petitioner's rights under the Fourth Amendment" IE moving a person to another place for the purpose of ID, without probable cause, is a violation. I saw nothing here that this guy was on the property, after being told to leave. So no crime, so no PC.
@@enderfal thanks, for your research. Sounds like common sense . It's crazy how the police are always so arrogantly sure of themselves. They are almost always full of shit!
You see, the officer was invoking the ancient law of equivalent exchange, where asking the officer a question means you HAVE to answer one of the officers' questions. Failure to do so results in the officer arresting you by force and wasting your time until a prosecutor decides no charges will be pressed.
Too easy. Decades of people obeying them. Decades of the government funding and standing by them. Decades of government noting the importance of police therefore qualified immunity especially for hiring more police. Shall I go on….
@@mr.duanesharpe You hit the nail on the head. While government isn't going to stop funding them and QI isn't going to go away what can happen is for everyone in the so called land of the free to start question their actions, learn the law and complain to their department every time you believe your rights are being infringed.
Thank you for shining a light on this, Philip. I’d love to see more of you doing audits. Your calm, intelligent demeanor and knowledge is powerful and a great education for all.
This is my first audit, I love to see the good responses for the video. I will keep it up but, I don't have representation for the case. Any chance anyone of you would assist in this matter? I would really appreciate you for this. Thank you in advance
Not really true. Such calls are generally evidence that does not establish truth of the matter. In general, a cop can find physical evidence and eye witness testimony to establish probable cause without "seeing for themselves." Some states have specific requirements for misdemeanors and trespassing, however.
When you think about any possible excuse that QI ever became a reality, this is not one of them, if there ever was. This officer had no excuse to not know the law
A disgrace that these public servants do not know & follow the LAWS. Instead of helping people these tyrants cause more harm. Keep doing what you do to expose these tyrants. Appreciate you, be safe & much love!!!👊🏾
All public employees and all law enforcement employees and all judges should be required to take continuing education classes on local and Constitutional law. Period.
It's clear to tell this gentleman has a disability. This is so damn sickening. This is why we do not need police to respond to situations like this. All they do is escalate.
Here's the education for those cops who need it. This is what happens after just six to seven months of academy training and no further education of the five elements of the first amendment. (Freedom of religion, freedom to assemble, freedom to petition your government, freedom of the press and freedom of speech). Some cops will claim they have been violating people's rights (I mean policing) for 20 to 30 years so they know what they are doing. 😐 For most of these cops, after the swearing in, the Bill of Rights is no longer relevant.
They changed to 'law enforcement' bc peace officer doesn't suit the goal of recruitment and the ultimate goal of standing occupation. Seems to be working out.
I would say the who thing is unlawful. He is not suspected of a crime. They tracked him down, handcuffed him, and transported him, so someone could give him a civil trespass notice.
Obstruction of law enforcement is not defined as refusing to cooperate. It’s defined as an overt action such as physically interfering with an officer, making a false statement/report pertaining to an investigation, etc. Refusing to cooperate is not obstruction. If this man is detained for an investigation he can invoke his 5th Amendment right to refuse to answer questions, especially if those questions may incriminate him. This officer is a an idiot. Mark Twain said something once about arguing with stupid people…
Well, the cop was definitely wrong about refusing to identify being obstruction. However, Georgia does have a sort of stop and identify law that applies to cases of suspected loitering or prowling. § 16-11-36 (b) Paraphrasing, if someone is suspected of loitering or prowling, then the officer should give the suspect the opportunity to "dispel any alarm" by identifying themselves. From what I understand of the situation, it would really be stretching it thin to claim that the man was suspected of loitering and needed to identify himself. But I bet that is what the cops lawyer will argue in court.
This issue here is you cannot loiter or prowl on a public the sidewalk and from this video we know the police officer never saw Mr. Moore on private property. Sure he could use that law to try to ID Mr. Moore but good luck on trying to defend that in court.
@@librab103 Many prosecutors and judges side with the cops on just about everything. I suspect it is the police union exerting pressure behind the scenes (they fear they will not be reelected if they cross the union). So, unfortunately, the cop has a pretty good chance of getting away with invoking that law.
Both of these cops are in the running for "dumbest cop of the year." I hope the arrested gentleman who had his property damaged takes legal action. This seems like an easy lawsuit.
This cop is either soo ignorant he should t be a cop. Or he is just attempting to violate this mans rights thru lieng and he shouldn't be a cop. Either way he sould not be a cop
Bingo. Unprofessional kop recognized he had issues articulating himself so this blue line klown just talked over him and hoped he could intimidate and exasperate Moore. It shows this tyrant's character as in: none
The Officer is dangerously dumb.
He’s a Christian
💯
The supervisor that called me back pretty much let me know if I told one of the office to screw themself we would see what happens. Sounds like a threat to me.
@@banditkitty2743 so are Christ Ian’s
The Second Amendment matters more this very day, than it did when it was first penned into our Bill of Rights.
Even with a disability, he is standing up for us.
Wonder if the ADA would help??? NEVER judge people before you know them…this man is a true warrior and has already fought a war inside his own body and WON. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
He got more ballz than most
@@_CuteBug_Thank you
@@johnsondoe3827thank you
Thank you brother 👍👍👍
He said, “I invoke my 5th Amendment right.” The recording party knows more about the law than the idiot cops.
everyone knows more about the law than the cops! We have to, we don't have qualified immunity to protect us from ignorance of the law.
That's becoming more the norm. Everyday people are getting to know the laws and our rights better than the majority of the psyCOPaths.
Proves beyond any doubt that if you can breathe, walk, and talk, you're qualified to be a cop.
Did you mean qualified to be crap?
no, you are totally incorrect. you cannot have an IQ higher than 50 to make it.
From this, it would appear that any ability to speak is just a bonus.
@@EnigmicIdentity100%
"breathe, walk, and talk"
But not necessarily all three at the same, obviously.
They still don’t realize the cameras ended the days of “I am the law and make it up as I go along.”
The camera only catches, I am the law, Do as i say, Obey or go to jail. It certainly doesn't stop it. Here is a Perfect example of rights violation & property damage.
Subconsciously they realize it, you defined perfectly the cognitive Dissonance that is at play when they act out
@@weequarter… Sadly, you are 100% correct.
But crucial video evidence of this nature - which provides daily proof to the entire world that American cops might be the dumbest, most poorly trained “law enforcers” in the world, is VITAL in the quest for fairness and a chance to regain some semblance of balance within the Justice System…
Sadly, I have to disagree with you. It has not ended, as just shown. I think they said this was in Georgia, but it is not as bad up there as it is down here in FL, the victim is still alive. I used to think that only 10% of LEOs were bad, after seeing stuff like this I think it is much closer to 50% with another 30% willing to not say anything to correct them.
And that is what bothers these types of police officers the most. In the past they were able to act with impunity, and more than likely did not have to do a lot of fishing because they simply said ex person did this, and it stuck,
the individuals had no recourse because they didn't have anything recorded. Now there's body cam footage and individuals personal phone are having a hard time hiding behind their poor policing. So l, restart the fish, they start to take any words you say twist that into obstruction. I would venture that 95% of these issues with police officers are retaliation for a person recording and then using their constitutional rights a shield against tyranny.
This cop: "Exercising your 5th amendment rights is a crime."
"Let's take you back to the place you left so we can criminally trespass you"🤔🙄
Trying to hold on to any civil rights are being difficult, disrespectful and obstructing/interfering. I find this attitude highly problematic.
Whenever a cop says the word “obstruction”, you know they’re full of crap.
that is their go to pretext. another is Stop Resisting when they break your bones.
And disorderly conduct
Resisting, obstruction, and disorderly. The only 3 laws cops think they know.
@@XJWill1Sure you right...
Help this gentleman file his formal complaint and File that lawsuit against all parties involved. I believe his 4th amendment rights were violated. Plus he cannot trespassed if he has left the property. They do not know the law. And he does not have to help them in their investigation. 5th amendment of the constitution.
He can be trespassed. He just can't be charged with trespassing or be forced to ID. But in any case, these cops don't know how to practice law enforcement properly. In any other occupation they would be fired.
Thank you @byronharmon5355
Taking him to a second location in handcuffs is not detainment. It's kidnapping.
Yep. As a retired LEO, they had no right to remove him from his location. That literally was kidnapping under color of law. 10 years in fderal prison if prosecut3d.
@LordHawHaw100 but none of the coward cops will arrest them. I bet you you wouldn't have either. And no coward prosecutor will prosecute them.
@@LordHawHaw100 Prosecutor: meh, I don't wanna.
@@LordHawHaw100 You're talking as if the police give a fuck about the law when it come to their own actions.
@@ned6938 The vast majority of prosecutors and judges are elected. But the voters know almost nothing about what the judges and prosecutors actually do in court. And the judges keep it that way by illegally prohibiting recording in the courts, even though everyone knows that is a constitutional right.
Since the voters know nothing about the corrupt officials, whether they get elected comes down to a popularity contest. And how do they win that contest? Avoid pissing off the biggest player (the cops union).
FUCK THE THIN BLUE LINE......
you do it, I'll watch cuz I wouldn't touch them with ... yours.
They owe him for the damages
They owe him for a hell of a lot more than that. And they should be in prison for the many felonies that they committed.
Constitutional Rights are going cheap these days.
That poor cop is too stupid to do anything, let alone carry a gun and a badge.
I bet he can stink up a shoe.
sue the shit out of them!
I am
@@timothymoore596Thank you
THAT IS DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR FROM THE POLICE. I WOULD GET A LAWYER AND SUE THEM.
We shouldn't need to sue them. This cop should be arrested, charged and prosecuted for the felonies that he committed.
@@ned6938 BAM! The fact that the prosecutor office refuses is in and of itself a felony . For failure to uphold their oaths!
@@ned6938BAMM!!!
Don’t expect anything different from any cop, it takes a sick and evil minded individual to be a cop
We miss your work. Your an OG a true patriot and a legion
Legend and I get it.
@@mr.duanesharpe sorry buzzzzzzzz
This is one of the dumbest cop on the internet. Just think he believes all the crap that he's saying.
Normal cop believes that the 5th amendment is a crime called, "obstructing" except when he uses it.
Why are you detaining me?
Answer: I have the right to remain silent.
Profound stupidity is the rule, not the exception.
I don't think that he believes that not answering questions is obstruction I think he was just trying to bluff the guy because if he truly believed it he would have arrested him for obstruction. He has most likely done this many times and people that have no clue what to law is will begin to sing like a canary.
@@MarkMixon-k5q He DID arrest him for obstruction.
When have you ever heard of any of the top 10 in the class becoming a cop
@@mrwilson7617I don't know either.
It's all about the cop's ego. Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity.
Nice
Officer its not tit for tat. He and chief should be fired and de certified. No crime no ID. And obstructions is a phyical act.
Providing the police with false or misleading information may constitute obstruction. Refusing to provide them with any information does not. You are under no obligation to assist the police in their investigations.
Obstruction IS not a physical act, pleading the 5th IS not Obstruction.
Uncle Ruckus won't be smiling too much longer.
They cannot lawfully take him somewhere while detained without it becoming a de facto arrest. He has a lawsuit.
He had standing for a 4th amendment violation as soon as he submitted to their assertion of authority without them having the legal justification for the seizure.
@@nic.hthank you for that info
I do
Unbelievable!! These are the kinds of actions the constitutional amendments were written for!
These wankers make up their own laws . Repealing a couple of constitutional amendments does not seem to bother these blockheads .
And have been severely undermined by the Supreme Court.
Dig it
Once the police take someone from the original location, it’s no longer a detainment.
Anyone can get into law enforcement...Proof positive
Excellent one here! This man handled himself perfectly and I do feel the deputy's actions needs to be professionally reviewed! 🤘
Thank you @HellOnWheels8
Mr. Moore needs to file a lawsuit, it is an easy win.
I've been contacting attorneys in Georgia but, no one has called me back. Any help you can give will be appreciated.
@@timothymoore596 which type of lawyers? Have you reached out to ACLU or FIRE?
@@librab103 do you have a number?
No , the law cannot take people back to a property to solicit a trespass.
You must be caught on the property when the cops arrive.
If he left the property after being told to there's no trespass and the cops seeing him off property is even more proof to such.
He wasn’t charged with trespassing he got a criminal trespass warning which means if he got back to the location again he is subject to being charged we don’t know what the original call came out as but the cops were not called for no reason so they had every right to
Stop him to further investigate the stop
@@trill_gavin6236I'm sorry to say that you are wrong.
Learn to say “I invoke my 1st 4th 5th and 6th Amendment rights” then remain silent.
If he asked another question you tell him he just violated my civil rights by asking a question without my legal representation.
💯✊
A John Deer just rolled by… yup Love JawGa
That is not how it works junior.
@@Look_What_You_Did This is how you cut thru qualified immunity faster.
Sorry but that isn't actually how it works. They can keep asking you questions if they want, but if you invoke your 5th AND say you want lawyer present for questioning, then they can run into trouble using what you said against you and a good lawyer can get it suppressed. But you won't have any luck trying to sue over them continuing to question you. You can name all the amendments if you want, but they all have different uses. As rage against the machine said, make a move and plead the 5th cause you can't plead the 1st.
It seems to be illegal to me too. I don't see how you can seize and transport someone who is not under arrest. I would love to know the legalities.
You can't. Transportation alone makes it a de facto arrest.
SCOTUS caselaw with some relevant facts to your query.
Hayes v. Florida, 470 U.S. 811 (1985) From the holding " Where there was no probable cause to arrest petitioner, no consent to the journey...no prior judicial authorization for detaining him, the investigative detention at the station for fingerprinting purposes violated petitioner's rights under the Fourth Amendment"
IE moving a person to another place for the purpose of ID, without probable cause, is a violation.
I saw nothing here that this guy was on the property, after being told to leave. So no crime, so no PC.
@@enderfal Such an easy lawsuit. So many rights violated.
@@enderfal thanks, for your research. Sounds like common sense . It's crazy how the police are always so arrogantly sure of themselves. They are almost always full of shit!
@@nuclearmedicineman6270I know
"I can't comment on a pending investigation" ! They use this all the time, we need to start using it as well. :)
Law enforcement in this vid is straight up dirty.
This cop loves the sound of his own voice.
In his head, that voice is brilliant.
You see, the officer was invoking the ancient law of equivalent exchange, where asking the officer a question means you HAVE to answer one of the officers' questions. Failure to do so results in the officer arresting you by force and wasting your time until a prosecutor decides no charges will be pressed.
I have a feeling this cop's school report cards were filled with D's. Maybe a C once.
There is no implied or actual reciprocity required when dealing with police.
Time and money
As Jeff Gray would say “What a bunch of Big Dummies!” :) ❤
Georgia is all you had to say.
DEI effects are now surfacing…. How ya like DEI now??? 🚫
I'm afraid you're right. Alabama & Mississippi are giving them a run for it too.
@@stevenl4494As an Alabamian, I can attest that this is VERY true. 😢💔
I had a DA actually try rhe same crap with me.
The look on his face when I told him he was a boldface liar. Priceless!
Why do cops still constantly get away with this mess?
Too easy. Decades of people obeying them. Decades of the government funding and standing by them. Decades of government noting the importance of police therefore qualified immunity especially for hiring more police. Shall I go on….
USA has always been an oligarchy and cops serve the oligarchs.
@@mr.duanesharpedon’t forget the corporations bribing…. I mean donating to the filthy politicians. .
@@garfieldcouch4443100%
@@mr.duanesharpe
You hit the nail on the head. While government isn't going to stop funding them and QI isn't going to go away what can happen is for everyone in the so called land of the free to start question their actions, learn the law and complain to their department every time you believe your rights are being infringed.
The test scores are based upon the average SAT. They get lower and lower every year.
Read the case law of Jordan v. New London, CT. This case is often cited in fair labor practices cases. They don't want intelligent candidates. ❤
Ooh that's huge constitutional violation and the cop has admitted to all of it .
Get the law suit going.
Lawsuits are expensive and cops know it. There wont be any lawsuit.
They don’t care. I spoke to a supervisor and asked what would happen if I told his officer to F off. He pretty much threatened an arrest.
I am, it seems to be difficult but I'm trying.
@@letsgobrandon7567why is that?
@@timothymoore596 for the reason I stated.
If he has never been trespassed from that location they can only issue a trespass WARNING, criminal would only apply if he returns.
I should have never got no criminal trepass
I’m not comfortable that I know more about the law than the cops
Thank you for shining a light on this, Philip. I’d love to see more of you doing audits. Your calm, intelligent demeanor and knowledge is powerful and a great education for all.
This is my first audit, I love to see the good responses for the video. I will keep it up but, I don't have representation for the case. Any chance anyone of you would assist in this matter? I would really appreciate you for this. Thank you in advance
Officer you do know the 5th amendment to the constitution.
"NO, you not answering questions is just exercising your rights, ... the cop not answering questions is OBSTRUCTION"! 😁🤪👍👍🇺🇸
Calls are Heresay and heresay is not generally allowed in courts.
The cop has to see for themselves a law has been broken.
Those never held accountable don't understand this concept.
Hearsay*
@@cup_cuppy_cuppers5817
You have the ability to edit your comment after it has been posted. ❤
Not really true. Such calls are generally evidence that does not establish truth of the matter. In general, a cop can find physical evidence and eye witness testimony to establish probable cause without "seeing for themselves." Some states have specific requirements for misdemeanors and trespassing, however.
Thanks for highlighting this! The way they treated this man is disgusting!!
Thank you
When you think about any possible excuse that QI ever became a reality, this is not one of them, if there ever was. This officer had no excuse to not know the law
Another cop that doesn't know the bill of rights ... America is full of em ...
Oh they know it. They just wipe their feet on it.
Brain aneurysm survivor still waaaaayyyyy smarter than a cop. That says it all doesn't it?
Absolutely 💯
You really put this in perspective. Wow! Cops should be ashamed of themselves
@@joannejohnson85 you are right
A primitive with a badge is a dangerous thing...
💯
As are all of them.
@@darrenpollard480 ??? All of them are what?
LOL
I wish it was easier to sue the cops. Ive never tried but i assume it not easy.
The cop should have been asked what his first sentence would be if he's arrested,,,, Miranda???
Do not sue don’t complain problem is freedom isn’t free so if you got no money for a lawyer you got no freedom
A disgrace that these public servants do not know & follow the LAWS. Instead of helping people these tyrants cause more harm. Keep doing what you do to expose these tyrants. Appreciate you, be safe & much love!!!👊🏾
If you choose not to answer questions that's not obstruction, that's exercising your constitutional rights.
Absolutely
“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.” ― Charles Bukowski
I have no sympathy for cops like that who don’t make it home at the end of their shift!! 🤷♂️
All public employees and all law enforcement employees and all judges should be required to take continuing education classes on local and Constitutional law. Period.
Those cops are legal 2A targets.
Yeah I know it's time to defund all this crap.
PIGNORANCE SMDH!
His cop sounds like he has bought a grade. 8 education. Too used to doing things the way they want.
Hopefully he filed complaints and filed lawsuit.
You ALWAYS have the right to remain silent.
Our rights do not start and stop based on permission from agents of the government. Our rights restrict government tyrants.
Your rights don't matter on the streets with an army of thugs in blue.
The transport back for the trespass warning was entirely uncalled for. Seems like abduction to me.
Me too
Good to see you again Bat !!!
Let’s keep in mind criminal organizations that force everyone to pay them do not work for the public.
Let’s go voluntary.
Seem? C'mon brother, you know dang right, this is unlawful. Easy peasy lawsuit.
It's clear to tell this gentleman has a disability. This is so damn sickening. This is why we do not need police to respond to situations like this. All they do is escalate.
Here's the education for those cops who need it. This is what happens after just six to seven months of academy training and no further education of the five elements of the first amendment. (Freedom of religion, freedom to assemble, freedom to petition your government, freedom of the press and freedom of speech). Some cops will claim they have been violating people's rights (I mean policing) for 20 to 30 years so they know what they are doing. 😐 For most of these cops, after the swearing in, the Bill of Rights is no longer relevant.
They changed to 'law enforcement' bc peace officer doesn't suit the goal of recruitment and the ultimate goal of standing occupation. Seems to be working out.
in most states its like 3-4 months.
You're spot on with your assessment!
Fulton County is contagious.
I've never met a cop without a huge ego. I swear certain types of people are drawn to law enforcement.
These Brothers have less sense than rocks.
Absolutely
Why are those people even aloud to be in any form of authority?
Get this guy a good payout.
Get rid of qualified immunity. And then sue the shit out of them personally.
I would say the who thing is unlawful. He is not suspected of a crime. They tracked him down, handcuffed him, and transported him, so someone could give him a civil trespass notice.
Obstruction of law enforcement is not defined as refusing to cooperate. It’s defined as an overt action such as physically interfering with an officer, making a false statement/report pertaining to an investigation, etc. Refusing to cooperate is not obstruction.
If this man is detained for an investigation he can invoke his 5th Amendment right to refuse to answer questions, especially if those questions may incriminate him. This officer is a an idiot. Mark Twain said something once about arguing with stupid people…
Well, the cop was definitely wrong about refusing to identify being obstruction. However, Georgia does have a sort of stop and identify law that applies to cases of suspected loitering or prowling. § 16-11-36 (b)
Paraphrasing, if someone is suspected of loitering or prowling, then the officer should give the suspect the opportunity to "dispel any alarm" by identifying themselves.
From what I understand of the situation, it would really be stretching it thin to claim that the man was suspected of loitering and needed to identify himself. But I bet that is what the cops lawyer will argue in court.
This issue here is you cannot loiter or prowl on a public the sidewalk and from this video we know the police officer never saw Mr. Moore on private property. Sure he could use that law to try to ID Mr. Moore but good luck on trying to defend that in court.
@@librab103 Many prosecutors and judges side with the cops on just about everything. I suspect it is the police union exerting pressure behind the scenes (they fear they will not be reelected if they cross the union).
So, unfortunately, the cop has a pretty good chance of getting away with invoking that law.
@@librab103 Many prosecutors and judges side with the cops on just about everything.
@@librab103 I suspect it is the police union exerting pressure behind the scenes.
@@librab103 They fear they will not be reelected if they cross the union.
You must answer my questions!
Two seconds later: You have the right to remain silent.
Welcome to Georgia be sure and set your clocks back at least a 100 years
LMAO
Thank you for exposing these dirty tyrant. FTP KNOW UR RIGHTS . THAT ONE DIRTY COP DONT NEED TO BE WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE'S
*When the popo comes your way, **_you'd better have that 2A! 😊_*
But will you live to tell the tale?
The law says the 5th amendment.
This man had a brain aneurysm, and he's still on the ball!!
Bullies😈
Respect, my brother since day, one..
they kidnapped the guy.
Both of these cops are in the running for "dumbest cop of the year." I hope the arrested gentleman who had his property damaged takes legal action. This seems like an easy lawsuit.
There’s a whole lot here kidnapping destruction of property unlawfull detention an I’d guess they got his I d also a 4 th amendment violation
After watching Jeff Grey and Sean-Paul I've come to the conclusion that Georgia Law enforcement is on a level of their own. 💯😱⚖️🇺🇸
"Forgot", yea sure, pull the other one. That was wilful destruction of property of an arrestee under police care for retaliatory purposes.
This Officer has proven only 1 thing, his abilities to count go to 3!
This cop is either soo ignorant he should t be a cop. Or he is just attempting to violate this mans rights thru lieng and he shouldn't be a cop. Either way he sould not be a cop
NO, if you are not "Free to Go", you ARE under arrest! Now if they don't charge you with something, that is FALSE ARREST! SUE THEM! 😁😝🤪🤣👍👍🇺🇸
Lol the ignorance is insane.
If he isn’t fired, fire the chief.
I think they just wanted to take advantage of a Handicapped man.
Bingo. Unprofessional kop recognized he had issues articulating himself so this blue line klown just talked over him and hoped he could intimidate and exasperate Moore. It shows this tyrant's character as in: none
That cop has such an ego he should be on the stage not in a uniform and carrying a gun...