I was extremely lucky to get an absolute mint early model with the build in level bubble in black. Might part with it eventually for $5K if I get an offer.
The later versions with rubber surfaced focus ring and Prontor shutter on the CF lens eliminated the linked f/stop and exposure rings. Makes it easier to change overall exposure setting when light is changing.
...in all my years using the SWC, pressing an extra lever to alter exposure settings never impacted my output. Critically, the C series lenses offered an automatic indicator which displayed DoF changes for each aperture - ingenious for zone focusing. The SWC was designed for a considered approach to photography.
@@illitrait Yes, I don't recall if I mentioned it here, but I ended up with that earlier version with the lever that disengages the exposure and f/stop rings, and I find it no trouble at all. And as you say, DOF is so easy to see.
Thanks for another wonderful video on great cameras which give me a sense of what a Hasselbad or Leica is like. If I can make a recommendation for your next video on rare, vintage cameras: The Nikon F2. Back in the day, I had a pristine Nikon F2 which unfortunately I lost due to a flooded basement. My understanding is the F2 was Nikon's last camera made by hand & it felt wonderful to use, not to mention produced outstanding photos.
Could you try the SWC again with the digital back off a 907X? If it works, it would give even better results than reviving the 500C. The focus distance can be guessed at easily, and an OVF is already there…waiting for some 60 years! I might just buy a SWC if I can shoot it digitally!
30 years ago, I’ve been using the SWC for a architecture documentation. Before, I had used a Rolleiflex 6006 with the Zeiß 40mm, which was also available for Hasselblad. A good lens, too, but bulky and probably expensive, so I think the SWC was the better alternative. Most of the time I had to shoot from a 7m ladder and the compact Hasselblad with its viewfinder really was easy to use in that unstable position, much more than the 500C, which I also used. However: how much better is a modern, mirrorless camera with image stabilization? I don’t miss the analog film experience.
I used to use one for interior shots very good because to the Sq image is very good for height in photographing rooms . A bit difficult to focus ,i used to focus with the 35 mm them transfer the reading to SWC ...... not great for street photography although I believe some press photographers did use them because the depth of field is so good with 38 mm lens. It's a blast from my photography past
hi Matti, what is that means: Hasselblad CFV II with the 907X? Is that the first or second generation of the v system? how about Hasselblad SWC? When that one came out? thank you.
The first SWC came in 1954. I'm sure Hasselblad website can tell you more about the history of the different models. I don't remember all models, unfortunately😀
There are plenty of digital backs that fit any camera of the V-system. They have been made by Hasselblad itself and by competitor like Kodak, Phase One and Leaf. Hasselblad has recently launched the CFV II 50C that mentions the SWC as one of the models where it can be used.
The motordrive SWC/M -EL is a faster camera than the normal SWC/M. A 24 > 4 exp. A 16 > 16 exp. A 16S > 16 exp. A 70 > 70 exp. A 500 > 500 exp. Polaback > 10 exp Sheetfilmback > 1 exp.
I once rented one to shoot a Civil War re-enactment 25 years ago. Loaded the magazines wrong and wasted 3 rolls. Later rented one to play with in the DC area. Would still love to own one! The old Zeiss Distagon 40 for regular Hasselblad was gigantic. A former teacher bought one because he did not like the SWC.
Video @ 3:18 "no way to focus" - Most folks don't realize that 'guestimation' is very forgiving with these SWC cameras & their focal length (21mm equivalent). The fantastic & simple continuously moving aperture depth of field red index marks, show you how unbelievably WIDE the DOF is. In fact, I laugh when I see an autofocus 21mm lens (or wider), it's TOTALLY unnecessary ! - Extra complexity and less durability with potentially a delay in the shutter release... BTW, with a little bit of ingenuity, this is one of the greatest compact PANO cameras that will produce at least 20 stunning images on a roll of 120 - - -
Thanks for your insights. There is no way to focus and verify the focus. You can guess or use a tape measure or whatever, but that not the same as focusing. Whether it's necessary to be able to focus, is of course a personal opinion and depends on the situation.
@@mattisulanto - "no way to focus and verify the focus" - Huh? 👀 It's a mathematical optical formula revealed by the Depth Of Field scale; the index moves as you select your aperture.
U are cheap..this camera brand new used to go for 6000 dollars...why don't you share the real price with the people plus you can't buy a mint condition one below 3000 dollars..
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for review of such masterpiece of engendering and history
Thanks for watching.
Some images are really astonishing! And the manoevrs between 2 shots slows down any hecticness!
Thank you.
I was extremely lucky to get an absolute mint early model with the build in level bubble in black. Might part with it eventually for $5K if I get an offer.
The SWC is famous for its industrial phtographs.
The later versions with rubber surfaced focus ring and Prontor shutter on the CF lens eliminated the linked f/stop and exposure rings. Makes it easier to change overall exposure setting when light is changing.
...in all my years using the SWC, pressing an extra lever to alter exposure settings never impacted my output. Critically, the C series lenses offered an automatic indicator which displayed DoF changes for each aperture - ingenious for zone focusing. The SWC was designed for a considered approach to photography.
@@illitrait Yes, I don't recall if I mentioned it here, but I ended up with that earlier version with the lever that disengages the exposure and f/stop rings, and I find it no trouble at all. And as you say, DOF is so easy to see.
Thanks for another wonderful video on great cameras which give me a sense of what a Hasselbad or Leica is like. If I can make a recommendation for your next video on rare, vintage cameras: The Nikon F2. Back in the day, I had a pristine Nikon F2 which unfortunately I lost due to a flooded basement. My understanding is the F2 was Nikon's last camera made by hand & it felt wonderful to use, not to mention produced outstanding photos.
Thanks. I'll keep the F2 in mind for the future.
@@mattisulanto thanks Matti
It’s also a predecessor to the 907X!
It sure is!
Could you try the SWC again with the digital back off a 907X? If it works, it would give even better results than reviving the 500C. The focus distance can be guessed at easily, and an OVF is already there…waiting for some 60 years! I might just buy a SWC if I can shoot it digitally!
That's a great idea, but unfortunately I can't do it, because at the moment I don't where I could get an SWC or the back.
The ground glass for focusing the SWC
when the camera is on a copy stand
to make a reproduction.
I actually used the SWC for architecture work in the film days, it is still a very unique camera now.
I did not know the film days were over.
30 years ago, I’ve been using the SWC for a architecture documentation. Before, I had used a Rolleiflex 6006 with the Zeiß 40mm, which was also available for Hasselblad. A good lens, too, but bulky and probably expensive, so I think the SWC was the better alternative. Most of the time I had to shoot from a 7m ladder and the compact Hasselblad with its viewfinder really was easy to use in that unstable position, much more than the 500C, which I also used. However: how much better is a modern, mirrorless camera with image stabilization? I don’t miss the analog film experience.
Thanks for sharing. I guess most of who used film for paid assignments don't really miss film at all😀 Nice memories, though.
Don’t miss the film experience? So why not try putting the digital back off a Hasselblad 907X on the SWC? 50mp, no film!
I used to use one for interior shots very good because to the Sq image is very good for height in photographing rooms .
A bit difficult to focus ,i used to focus with the 35 mm them transfer the reading to SWC ...... not great for street photography although I believe some press photographers did use them because the depth of field is so good with 38 mm lens. It's a blast from my photography past
Thanks for sharing!
The Hasselblad aerial camera
was the first mirrorless camera
made during WW II.
Thanks😂 My bad. I should have said I'm talking about cameras for normal consumers.
hi Matti, what is that means: Hasselblad CFV II with the 907X? Is that the first or second generation of the v system? how about Hasselblad SWC? When that one came out? thank you.
The first SWC came in 1954. I'm sure Hasselblad website can tell you more about the history of the different models. I don't remember all models, unfortunately😀
Nice
Lee friedlander makes me want one 😂
I.i.r.c. there was a digital back for the Hasselblad. That would make this camera much more practical.
I'm sure one of the backs will work with this.
There are plenty of digital backs that fit any camera of the V-system. They have been made by Hasselblad itself and by competitor like Kodak, Phase One and Leaf. Hasselblad has recently launched the CFV II 50C that mentions the SWC as one of the models where it can be used.
The motordrive SWC/M -EL is a faster
camera than the normal SWC/M.
A 24 > 4 exp.
A 16 > 16 exp.
A 16S > 16 exp.
A 70 > 70 exp.
A 500 > 500 exp.
Polaback > 10 exp
Sheetfilmback > 1 exp.
Whats the slowest speed you can handhold that camera?
I don't know, I never tried.
@@mattisulanto ok, It would be interesting to know.
@@monsieurgolem3392 This is an old video and I have returned the camera long time ago. So not possible to double check.
could you please tell me what bag you are using at @2:30?
It's the LowePro ProTactic MG 160 AW II.
@@mattisulanto thank you
I wish someone made a 4K 1:1 monitor
We need modern square monitors, we need 4:3, 5:4, 16:10 again
Fine craftsmanship comes at a price. Always has and always will.
I would be afraid to take it out in the street. Not that I can afford one anyway.
Hasselblad Cameras are "work machines", you do not need to worry about using those Cameras.
Cool video.
Thanks!
I once rented one to shoot a Civil War re-enactment 25 years ago. Loaded the magazines wrong and wasted 3 rolls.
Later rented one to play with in the DC area.
Would still love to own one!
The old Zeiss Distagon 40 for regular Hasselblad was gigantic. A former teacher bought one because he did not like the SWC.
Thanks for sharing.
Does it shoot videos in 4K or 8K ??
It shoots 32K!😀
@@mattisulanto But 6x6=36 So it should be 36K
Fun toy to use.
Nice product for a hipster, what do they smoke by Hasselblad? :-)
Your brains.
Video @ 3:18 "no way to focus" - Most folks don't realize that 'guestimation' is very forgiving with these SWC cameras & their focal length (21mm equivalent).
The fantastic & simple continuously moving aperture depth of field red index marks, show you how unbelievably WIDE the DOF is.
In fact, I laugh when I see an autofocus 21mm lens (or wider), it's TOTALLY unnecessary ! - Extra complexity and less durability with potentially a delay in the shutter release...
BTW, with a little bit of ingenuity, this is one of the greatest compact PANO cameras that will produce at least 20 stunning images on a roll of 120 - - -
Thanks for your insights. There is no way to focus and verify the focus. You can guess or use a tape measure or whatever, but that not the same as focusing. Whether it's necessary to be able to focus, is of course a personal opinion and depends on the situation.
@@mattisulanto - "no way to focus and verify the focus" - Huh? 👀
It's a mathematical optical formula revealed by the Depth Of Field scale; the index moves as you select your aperture.
@@y2ktube You win😅 Could you post a link to your online portfolio. I have a feeling I could learn a lot from you.
U are cheap..this camera brand new used to go for 6000 dollars...why don't you share the real price with the people plus you can't buy a mint condition one below 3000 dollars..
I have an absolute mint black model. Awesome. I would not sell it for less than 5K.