It does look good, however I tend to group the mass terms together to emphasize the fact that our final velocity is equal to the initial velocity multiplied by a unitless ratio of the masses involved. This hopefully leads to some insite on the outcome of replacing one size set of masses with another. Of course, you are publishing this tomorrow, so maybe save that thought for some other time. Love your videos.
I am from India and i give you a suggestion that in India a lots of student studying online for preapare IIT JEE exam. If you make chapterwise video for IIT JEE student then your subscriber will more increase and student is also happy. Good luck sir i am also preparing IIT JEE exam
As I make the videos I organize them in to JEE/NEET playlists: ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYDQReU7-TQHbGvj8W8Pady ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mZYxRS9dfDlSkkIxdmdQ8HL ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mbJG8HX-2oCPm0nYN8NedEa ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mZpzLkC3FQusyXrMZkalDdr ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYV7H8o6y44tOOe7-BS-HbV ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYh-ghsV3yJMz-rim9D0Q0w ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mY-fUOkQ60QMMG8bcMRlh_5 Do you know of anywhere I can post links to these playlists that would be more readily found by students studying for the JEE and NEET?
when calculating the % error, why do you not consider significant digits from the actual value? observed and actual both have 2 significant digits. Even if you carried one extra digit past the significant digit, the error would be 0%. I'm not criticizing, I'm really seeking to understand why. Thanks for all you do in the name of Physics!
You should not round in the middle of a problem. If you determine an answer in the middle of the problem and then round to get your answer, you should then use the unrounded answer for the rest of the problem. As you pointed out, rounding in the middle of the problem here would result in a 0% error, which makes no sense.
I second Mr. P's comment, but wanted to add that whenever you calculate errors or uncertainties on a measurement, there are separate rules for reporting the numbers. That said, if you have not yet discussed reporting uncertainties, then I would use the full values during the calculation, then round to the appropriate number of significant figures as the last step in the calculation.
The physics work the physics work...... Your dance was superb😂👌. Thank u sir
Thanks!
Your video's are beyond excellent!! Keep it up!
Thanks. Currently working on one!
I love this so much! Your channel is very interesting
Glad you think so!
Ur videos r jst AMAZING Sir😊
TY!
It does look good, however I tend to group the mass terms together to emphasize the fact that our final velocity is equal to the initial velocity multiplied by a unitless ratio of the masses involved. This hopefully leads to some insite on the outcome of replacing one size set of masses with another. Of course, you are publishing this tomorrow, so maybe save that thought for some other time. Love your videos.
I like the approach. Perhaps I'll work this into a later video on momentum. Thanks again.
I am from India and i give you a suggestion that in India a lots of student studying online for preapare IIT JEE exam. If you make chapterwise video for IIT JEE student then your subscriber will more increase and student is also happy. Good luck sir i am also preparing IIT JEE exam
As I make the videos I organize them in to JEE/NEET playlists:
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYDQReU7-TQHbGvj8W8Pady
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mZYxRS9dfDlSkkIxdmdQ8HL
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mbJG8HX-2oCPm0nYN8NedEa
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mZpzLkC3FQusyXrMZkalDdr
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYV7H8o6y44tOOe7-BS-HbV
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mYh-ghsV3yJMz-rim9D0Q0w
ruclips.net/p/PLPyapQSxH6mY-fUOkQ60QMMG8bcMRlh_5
Do you know of anywhere I can post links to these playlists that would be more readily found by students studying for the JEE and NEET?
love the video!
How I wish you were my physics teacher...
Amazing.
How do you time the motion of your ball/cart?
I count frames and use the frame rate to convert from frames to seconds.
Thank you!
If the relative speed of two objects immediately after a collision is zero, is the collision perfectly inelastic?
when calculating the % error, why do you not consider significant digits from the actual value? observed and actual both have 2 significant digits. Even if you carried one extra digit past the significant digit, the error would be 0%. I'm not criticizing, I'm really seeking to understand why. Thanks for all you do in the name of Physics!
You should not round in the middle of a problem. If you determine an answer in the middle of the problem and then round to get your answer, you should then use the unrounded answer for the rest of the problem. As you pointed out, rounding in the middle of the problem here would result in a 0% error, which makes no sense.
I second Mr. P's comment, but wanted to add that whenever you calculate errors or uncertainties on a measurement, there are separate rules for reporting the numbers. That said, if you have not yet discussed reporting uncertainties, then I would use the full values during the calculation, then round to the appropriate number of significant figures as the last step in the calculation.
Looks good!
Thank you so much for all your help my friend.
THE PHYSICS WOOOORKKSS
Are you supposed to be an iphone?
"Even my underwear is yellow"
It was even true.
Wow