Pete Sampras: All 16 Masters & ATP Finals Title-Winning Moments 🏆
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
- Celebrating one of tennis' all-time greats with some of Pistol Pete's biggest titles... Subscribe to our channel for the best ATP tennis videos and tennis highlights: ruclips.net/user/tennistv?sub_...
Watch more ATP tennis compilations of retired greats: • James Blake: Brilliant...
Watch official ATP tennis streams from every tournament: tnn.is/RUclips
Tennis TV is the OFFICIAL live streaming service of the ATP Tour.
Tennis TV features live streaming and video on demand of ATP tennis matches in full on PC, Mac, mobile & tablet apps on iOS & Android. Download the app to stream on your device: tnn.is/RUclips
Plus Tennis TV is also available to stream tennis on your TV on Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Samsung Smart TV, LG Smart TV, Android TV, PlayStation 4, Xbox One and Chromecast. 
Спорт
Sampras the amazing player the best of all times for my
He is the best!
Incredible player!!
Top 3 all time!!
Best serve in ATP!!
Of all the legend's of the sport, and I'm talking about men who have won at least 6 majors, Pete Sampras had the greatest serve. It was absolutely awesome. He is what I would describe as the best game point against player I have seen. Overall top 4 best mens players I have seen since 1978.
I can add to that Andrew, as I started watching tennis in 1968, tail end of Laver's career, and I still watch tennis today. Laver and Sampras remain the 2 greatest players I've seen. Both absolutely dominant in their eras, when there were some exceptional players around.
Federer had way more aces, although his career is longer, but his average serve speed is way faster overall. He is a serve machine back in 2000-2010 decade
Happy birthday Pete! Tennis hasn't been the same since you retired.
The most badass player in tennis history bar NONE. Played a super high risk game seem high percentage.
Simply the best! The 1996 ATP Final against Becker still remains fresh in my memory as outstanding. I watched all these finals, so thanks for putting together some great memories.
Magnificent Pete Sampras! He will always be my favorite!!
Sometimes under appreciated but still top 5 ever for sure
no, just GOAT.
@@georgegl3192 once was not anymore
Best of his generation
@L B fairly recently - after 2007 they changed it to 3
Nobody under appreciated him..
Great Pete!
We NEED back the best of 5 set finals.
@T1mTenn1s
Oui comment l'as-tu su?
At least at the ATP finals
It's to much so they stopped it
@@joshheinink They stopped it because they are too lazy to change the schedule and avoid consecutive M1000.
@@masters.1000 oh
Pete the Great
One of the best players ever
after the big 3 he is the best player
@@thorragnarok3386 You forgot Murray!!
@Press and Hold ! I know. I meant Murray should also be there in par with him
Average duration of match points - 1,5 seconds...
:DDDD
Such a beautiful game. Poetry in motion.
Great video ! :)
My favourite player.
One of the goats.
Top 5 in the best tennis players of all Time.
The ultimate fantasy big 4 for me would have been Sampras, Rafa, Federer, Djokovic all in about the same age group. I would add in Murray and Wawrinka for desert.
SAMPRAS HAD FLOW
Dude show us some 90s Pete's matches...
Pistol Pete
Agassi,Kafelnikov,Becker were all his bunnies
Pistol Pete aka King of Swing: at his peak, he was devastating on both the first and second serves. Sampras was an all-court player and he challenged the best baseliners many times and was rock solid.
Sampras serve was arguably his best weapon (perhaps second only to his attacking style of play), Sampras had such a fluid and relaxed motion that allowed him to hit such a heavy ball with huge amounts of spin which made it both difficult to read and even harder to return with any purchase on it. It was also so good in the clutch moments.
Check out my Sampras tribute video :
ruclips.net/video/4AoCLktVw0I/видео.html
Your overview accurately describes the Sampras I watched. If he were able to hang around for awhile longer, the W/L columns of the others would look different.
@@notsohandytim5090 thanks, i totally agree with you .
Amazing Fed has 28 masters, Rafa has 36 masters & Nole has record 37 masters but Sampras despite dominant in the 90's had only 11 ( less than even Andy Murray). That is unreal.
But the 14 grand slam benchmark he sets was not enough considering Borg could have more than him if he not retired early or Rod laver could have 20 major if he did not have played in pro slams.
It is even more mind boggling when you consider that people like Lendl, Connors and McEnroe also have won more of these elite tournaments than him in general, back when they were "super 9" series or "grand prix championships series", which are equivalent of the "masters" series, that kickstarted the 90's decade! How many S9/GPSS tournament those 3 aforementioned legends have won as there is no definitive consensus as status of each of those tournament weren't as clear back in the day as when masters were introduced, but it is clearly within 15-25 title range, which is more than Sampras won!...
If you notice the pattern - there is no masters titles won by Pete in 1996 and 1998! Which is mind boggling too, since he was in his grand slam winning shape (even though he didn't dominate those seasons like others!)...
@@Summon256 yeah well said. According to their stats wiki page- Lendl had 22 masters but in 'grand prix super series ' wiki page says that Lendl had 29 titles, McEnroe had 19 or 26 titles (depending on source), Connors had 17 or 23 titles (depending on source), Borg had 15 titles & Becker had 13 titles. So they all have more than Sampras.
@@Summon256 well USA biased media in 90's overhyped Sampras's grand slam quest too much. Frankly nobody before him was interested in bogus Roy Emerson 12 slams tally. If Laver, Rosewall, Pancho Gonzales didn't turned pro then each of them could have won more than 14 slams. Tilden could won more than 14 slams if transportation was easier back in his days, Borg might have won most slams if he didn't retired at the age of 25. So I didn't surprise that big 3 surpassed his mark easily.
@@rajusaha855 Yup! Haha Agassi has won 17 as well! This borderline embarassing for someone like Sampras! LOL I dunno what was that about masters, that completely turned him off, but he was definitely playing more lazy and uninterested there, than at both grand slams and ATP finals, where most of the time he was giving his all!...
Ganó algún torneo en arcilla ..?
si gano 3 torneos en tierra, en el 92 en Austria, en el 94 en Roma y en el 98 en Atlanta. Lo que no gano nunca en tierra fue un grand slam solo consiguio llegar a semifinal en Roland Garros en el 96
Didn't you see the clip in this video of him winning in Rome, against Becker?
9:32 brasileiro é foda haha
Sampras would destroy Novak and Rafa on fast courts. They'd have no chance.
He could beat them and Roger but he wouldn't destroy them.
Lol.
Sumnah Lennon wdym federer beat Sampras
@@tomca1306 And? It was 7-5 in the 5th, if they'd faced each other more often Sampras could've won a few
@@mattlee7463 Yeah but Federer >> Sampras based on almost 40 titles delta including 6 Grand Slam, 1 Masters Cup and several Masters series crown, and considering the strenght on clay with only 1 SF at RG for the great Pistol Pete. Federer lost a lot of big Finals on clay only for the presence of the undisputed GOAT in that surface. Very unlucky man, the swiss Maestro could have completed at least 2 consecutive Grand Slam.
air sampras
WOOHOO
Pete Sampras was my childhood favorite. Now Roger.
Old federer
Guga got robbed big time on Miami 2000
Absolutely
So overrated because of his serve.
Wrong. You don't win 14 slams just because of your serve. Pete was an all-court player who could hold his own against the best baseliners.
Most overrated player of all time. Wouldn’t probably even win a set in 10 matches against prime federer or djokovic at Wimbledon
Bullshit
Bad joke, one of all time great serve & volley player, he would kick Rafa ass there, and it would be very close matches against Roger and in form Đoković. Remember, in 90's ball didn't bounce nearly as high on grass like from let say 2008 onward. Just imagine how difficult would be for Novak and Rafa to pick up that low balls...
@Lukas Gigler Did you smoke? 🚬🚬🚬😂😂😂
Are you on drugs? On real Wimbledon grass, which was fast and low-bouncing, he would destroy Novak and Fed. Novak would have no time defend and slide, like he's able to do on the slow-as-molasses grass that's there now.
Pomerlain89 didn’t baby fed beat him on „real grass“? Also Novak would give him a hard time no matter on which grass they played. He’s one of the best returners and counterstrikers in the game, Sampras sv-game would play right into his hands and Pete can’t keep up from the baseline with either because his groundstrokes suck huge balls especially on the backhand which was the main reason he was so unsuccessful on clay