Chess players will see you make a single move and go "Aha! You have fallen for the French Bleepity barp technique. Within twenty seven moves, victory shall be mine"
I know man, I played my sister in chess once where I was playing someone really good at chess and they had to leave so she took his place. I had a perfect setup for what I could tell he was setting up and my sister just move pieces left and right with no idea what was going on. I did beat her, but it took way longer than I expected because she was moving places that where awful and I was so taken aback I wasn’t thinking in my moves
@@jedtaylor6758 It's like that old proverb: "The world's best swordsman doesn't fear the second best swordsman. He fears the world's worst swordsman because he has no idea what his opponent will do"
fun fact: this is actually called the Tennison Gambit.. A youtuber named "Bosnian Ape Society" made a parody video about this which is titled "Tennison Gambit ICBM Variation" where he said it can be replaced by TOW Missile fired from an M3 Bradley if you're a beginner
The issue is at 0:35, if the opponent decides to ignore the knight, and moves their knight back to cover the space in front of the queen, that will screw up your entire strategy. Or if they Move the bishop to d7, blocking off the queen. Or they move pawn at g7 up one, blocking the eventual bishop, with a pawn supported with another pawn. Or the enemy thinks of sacrificing their own bishop at c8, moving it to e6, enticing the knight to kill it, instead of the pawn at f7, and if they don't go for the bishop then, then the bishop can take the knight after it kills the pawn, keeping the king quite safe. Your entire strategy is based on the pawn at h7 moving. If it doesn't move, and they move many other pieces instead, then it ruins your strategy. Otherwise a cool thing, will have to try it out sometime.
@@polarpenguin3 Not really, chess is mostly about good moves, not about hoping that enemy makes the single bad move. that's what gambits are about, that's also why most of them aren't played in slow time controls
If they don't kick your knight away, just keep developing. That knight is in a great position, just make sure you know how it will get out if it's attacked. Position is entirely playable below like 2100, and even then it might be. Wouldn't know, I'm not at that level.
@@Soul-ex8gbChess is about thinking through moves and making good decisions. This opening doesn't lose if the opponent defends in a basic way, it just doesn't win on the spot like it does if they fall into the trap.
What is this? What are you doing? - The Pelagatti Attack? - The Archizer-Meyer Countergambit? - Der Hammerschlag? - The Zugzwang Zigzag? - The Poached Penguin? - The Drunken Tartakower? - Some half-cocked variation of the Dizzi Whippet Defense? - Checkers???
This does actauly make it harder as for this to work, your opponent has to be quite skilled at chess, at 600 elo most people wouldn’t do those moves that are needed to set up the ballistic missile
@@user-gh3dc7zh5ypeople with high elo would definitely not play all those stupid moves like h6 and would see the problem with taking the knight, so only low elo players would fall for this
so the board is weird at ten seconds to show the black pawn move h3 is the first move for white but then it switches boards to where pawn is back to h2. so i dont know why but he did switch the board to where black moved first somehow.
such is the nature of gambits, if your foe knows the gambit they can decline, meaning you ruin your own position for no gain, or if they're bad at the game, they won't know know what a good move is to fall for the trap of the gambit.
This... you found the part where i breaks down. You dont have to be especially good to think 2 moves ahead on the one single piece your considering moving to threaten... some people will fall for this, but not many, and this is the very beginning of being able to play chess effectively(think 1-2 moves in advance for singular pieces)
edit : after actively playing this opening (and also the black variant) i see a 5% sucess because absolutly no one defends the pawn with the knight, andBUT when this opening works, it feels great
One problem is to find an opponent in the middle of the curve... End of the curve they'll just see right through it, start of the curve will baffles you instead
A lot of people in here are saying their opponents aren't good enough to play the right moves for this when h6 is a nonsensical move in that position lol
When I was playing chess on a chess team in grade school, we figured not many players can play the game effectively without their queen so my team learned how to play without their queen and how to trade queens as fast as possible. We didn't make state championships but we did beat our greatest rival school and the #1 player in the league.
I feel personally offended by this video and the comment section in general. As a professional chess player, I can guarantee you that no one over 500 elo will fall for this dumb trick. Anyone that's "quite skilled at this game" will see Kxf7 and won't play h6, as the knight isn't really doing anything there and it violates the basic knowledge of developing your pieces. Even if someone did play h6, no one with more than 20 seconds in the clock would take the knight. The only scenario I can see this working is in a 500 elo (or less) bullet game.
Which is essentially like 2% chance to happen even when you're in that sweet spot of the best chances for this to happen because black can make so many other moves that change things up and requires white to improvise (even if they get a lead)
I did this once when I was like 13 in a school chess tournament. I’d never _heard_ of this actual strategy, I was just thinking 2-3 moves ahead and thought I’d try something ambitious. It worked.
This one and the checkmate in 3 moves are nice to open up, but they're also so common almost all players will immediately counter you instead of playing along.
You're probably just thinking of the fork attack by the knight (or specifically queen-rook forks). That is very common. This just uses _a_ knight fork, but it is not _the_ strategy/opening being used here. Pretty much nobody -whether they know chess or are clueless about chess- play this sort of opening. It's far from good and it's far from brainless, and there's no reason for people in-between to play it either unless they specifically had this strategy in mind.
Only challenge in this opening is find someone smart enough to do those moves but not too smart so then they dont fall for it and you make the sacrifices for nothing 😅😂
I discovered this when playing in high-school. I didn't know what it was called but when money or a prize was involved I saved it for the last three rounds.
1. play against a bot in another tab 2. set it to insane or the highest difficulty 3. copy your opponents move with your own chess pieces in the other tab playing against the bot 4. when the bot responds with their own move, copy that move on the tab with the human opponent
Friendly tip: After the gambit, if the opponent moves pawn e7, they prepare the dark square bishop for a check at b4. That move also activates the opponent's rook, that now threatens the queen, turning the gambit into a huge disadvantage. Solution: After queen takes queen, if the opponent moves pawn e7, your queen should take the opponent's b7 pawn. That way your queen guards the b column, removing the bishop threat. Alternatively, you can move your king to f1. However, you lose castling. Happy elo climbing 😊
Ive won a handful of games based on this strategy (that I didn’t know was an officially, named move set) where I find an opening in my opponent’s defence and load one or both of my rooks up in front of my queen. When the chamber is loaded, I send one after the other. Typically, the first rook is taken as a response, only for the second rook to respond. When or if they take the second rook, the queen is the decisive piece that garners the checkmate. The set up is always a gamble as it has to been done subtly enough for the opponent not to notice, therefore it can take upwards of 5-10 moves to “load the chamber”.
I have a strategy I do and it works basically every time… I have not found someone competent enough to counter it. It’s really easy to counter and because I do it at the start of every game, I even straight up announce that I’m doing it… yet people still don’t defend themselves, or at least take advantage of my predictable set up. What I’m saying is that I haven’t found anyone that would even be competent enough to let me use an ICBM on them
For me I tweaked the moves where the fork actually does work in the king can’t kill them because the knight is being protected by the bishop and only and the bishop doesn’t have to be sacrificed and a pawn as well
This is the kind of strategy that you must do to a person with a specific skill level. If they're too bad, they won't follow the moves you planned. If they're too good, they'll know what you're doing.
You’d think ICBM only works on dumb players, but ironically it only works on smart players who will attempt to strategically counter your pieces (instead of mindlessly capturing and moving).
I just imagine the actual queen of England piloting a B-52 dropping bombs on the royal court of another country with her aviators on and Beethoven or sumn playin in the background
The bait to queen's pawn would only work on total beginners. You never sacrifice king's pawn in the opening unless you have to. Just move king's pawn up one.
The only thing is, this only work with people who are good and play it a lot. Someone who plays a lot of chess and is very good at it told me once : "the only opponent a chess master fears, is someone who doesnt know what theyre doing."
Actually...... It's called the Tennyson Gambit! Works well for Blitz and Bullet Games. Even if your opponent is able to refute the opening, there're still a lot of good variations in the middle and end games. Loads of Fun for the Skilled and Confident player!
I've never studied chess but my friends and i used to play a lot and this was a series of moves i figured out. My friend had foolsmated me so many times when i first started so to pull this off a few times to his complete bewilderment was very worth it
No , that doesn't bait them into playing e5, that's just what you want them to play , they re more likely to just open as you did and play a bishop in response.
Only problem.
Finding people who are actually smart enough to do those moves.
@@yes46 damn
Problem
Finding smart people in general
Up until a certain point, then it is imagination
I just discovered I made one like this but way more effectively without even thinking
I’m by no means a good player, but I still see this idea work it at the 1300-1400 level, usually in the caro
"ay there's your pawn being attacked by my knight lol you must-"
"idc" *proceeds to move random pieces with no meaning*
"This guy must be a prodigy. He's making moves that even I don't understand, what is he planning? My IBM strat has been foiled"
😂😂😂 these 2 comments just made my day 😂😂😂😂😂
“It’s too bad, I’ve got no clue what a strategy is!”
How can you defend against me when *I* don't even know what I'm doing?!
"To confuse the enemy, you must first confuse yourself" -Sun Tsu, Art of War
This will only work if your opponent is skilled enough in this game
To real bro people who suck at chess but know how to play the game r the worst because they are just so unpredictable
@@Breach_gaming my friend has this exact problem, I play in a really dumb way and keep baiting him into things
Skilled but not too skilled.
@@codycook8404 well, that indicates that they probably aren't that good
Well made games require you to have the fundamentals to beat bad players (skill issue)
-Try strategy
+Enemies don't play the same moves
-loose all thought process
-resign
Pretty much sums up many of my games.
sums up my thought process anytime I see a chess strategy tutorial
lose*
Lmao I guess modern chess players are NPCs
ah yes, the opening that only works in 600mmr but relies on the opponent being at least 1600mmr
nobody at 1600 is falling for the tennison
hes "only rank 600" meaning top 600 in the world, not 600mmr.
@@smurfdaddy420 No, he's saying chess rank which is terrible. This is garbage chess you play on someone too new to know better.
@@ronj9448 A player who is too new wouldn't do what black did in this game.
Can confirm that my 500 rated ass would have been able to see this move, but my 1900 rated ass actually did lose this to a
"King to G6"
"Intercontinental ballistic missile to D8"
FR
Imagine a commentator like levy saying this lmao
So true😂😂😂
@@manavkumar1 I watch him so much i hear him saying this and its peak.
So it would be called a date?
"ha, i got your knight!"
*"Legalizing nuclear bombs"*
_"Swag Messiah!"_
BEES MAKE HONEY
We love casting missiles
This song was sponsored by...
THE SHADOW GOVERMENT.
@@Shadow-._duo (😱)
Chess players will see you make a single move and go "Aha! You have fallen for the French Bleepity barp technique. Within twenty seven moves, victory shall be mine"
What YuGiOh shit is this?
How original
@@mrcroob8563 Well excuse me for not pulling up with some scathing Shakespearean level soliloquy about a board game
@@yeetthebeatout6906 Well you could just not make the same joke that's made under every single chess video.
@@yeetthebeatout6906 wow, how creative of you
"Ah, it seems you've fallen for the old Tsar Bomba. In approximately 76 moves, this game will be mine."
Bruh fr ☠️💀☠️
"I move my knight here!"
I'll move my knight too then, I guess, because you moved yours, I dunno
"Hmmm, how can I missile now?"
Never underestimate the stupid ingenuity of a noob
I know man, I played my sister in chess once where I was playing someone really good at chess and they had to leave so she took his place. I had a perfect setup for what I could tell he was setting up and my sister just move pieces left and right with no idea what was going on. I did beat her, but it took way longer than I expected because she was moving places that where awful and I was so taken aback I wasn’t thinking in my moves
@@jedtaylor6758 It's like that old proverb: "The world's best swordsman doesn't fear the second best swordsman. He fears the world's worst swordsman because he has no idea what his opponent will do"
“My opponent can’t predict what I do if I can’t predict what I do”
That how I talk, I’m going say something dumb anyway so I don’t think before I speak to be as surprised as everybody else
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."
Bro's playing Netflix adaptation of chess with that first move
Lol
😂
Underrated comment. Bravo
I know nothing about chess and still find that funny
@@krawc0 White moves first in chess but black moved first in this vid
fun fact: this is actually called the Tennison Gambit..
A youtuber named "Bosnian Ape Society" made a parody video about this which is titled "Tennison Gambit ICBM Variation" where he said it can be replaced by TOW Missile fired from an M3 Bradley if you're a beginner
Bosnian Ape Society is way too good
the "how to protect your computer from mbts" and "how to protect your shopping cart" are the bests ones by far
It STARTS as the Tennison. It TRANSPOSES into the ICBM Gambit.
yeah, he for sure copied this from them
@@AceH.-jk5kn he didnt copy it has become (kind of) an actual variation used
@@gabrielzahradka6454 the moves he showed are just the tennison gambit tho, no variation was shown.
The issue is at 0:35, if the opponent decides to ignore the knight, and moves their knight back to cover the space in front of the queen, that will screw up your entire strategy.
Or if they Move the bishop to d7, blocking off the queen.
Or they move pawn at g7 up one, blocking the eventual bishop, with a pawn supported with another pawn.
Or the enemy thinks of sacrificing their own bishop at c8, moving it to e6, enticing the knight to kill it, instead of the pawn at f7, and if they don't go for the bishop then, then the bishop can take the knight after it kills the pawn, keeping the king quite safe.
Your entire strategy is based on the pawn at h7 moving. If it doesn't move, and they move many other pieces instead, then it ruins your strategy.
Otherwise a cool thing, will have to try it out sometime.
Lmao, yes, that's how Chess works...
@@polarpenguin3 Not really, chess is mostly about good moves, not about hoping that enemy makes the single bad move.
that's what gambits are about, that's also why most of them aren't played in slow time controls
Average chess player response when they see one 30 second chess video 💀
If they don't kick your knight away, just keep developing. That knight is in a great position, just make sure you know how it will get out if it's attacked. Position is entirely playable below like 2100, and even then it might be. Wouldn't know, I'm not at that level.
@@Soul-ex8gbChess is about thinking through moves and making good decisions. This opening doesn't lose if the opponent defends in a basic way, it just doesn't win on the spot like it does if they fall into the trap.
What is this? What are you doing?
- The Pelagatti Attack?
- The Archizer-Meyer Countergambit?
- Der Hammerschlag?
- The Zugzwang Zigzag?
- The Poached Penguin?
- The Drunken Tartakower?
- Some half-cocked variation of the Dizzi Whippet Defense?
- Checkers???
"How did you dodge my missile?"
"I am dumb"
you try to find out what my next move is, but its not even based. xD
literally the plot of Mashle
No-- you kinda have to be dumb to do this. If you know how to play chess at a competent level, you'd opt for more pressure not a pawn trade
Being a 600 elo player is part of what allows this to work
Nah it only makes it harder
This does actauly make it harder as for this to work, your opponent has to be quite skilled at chess, at 600 elo most people wouldn’t do those moves that are needed to set up the ballistic missile
@@user-gh3dc7zh5ypeople with high elo would definitely not play all those stupid moves like h6 and would see the problem with taking the knight, so only low elo players would fall for this
@@mightbe_aura but most low elo players wouldn’t play those moves either so for this to work you have to be in a sweet spot between high and low elo
@@user-gh3dc7zh5y not a chess guy, is 600 elo bad? That's top 1000, right?
I was thinking this was going to be some funny mod or something but i got tricked into watching a chess video
RUclips channel Bosnian Ape Society has a meme video on this gambit
LOL
Just say you're allergic to non-brainrot content
@@deedeecarlsberg1568 Damn, how dare they not enjoy chess 😔
"THIS IS PAWN 3 REQUESTING BALLISTIC MISSILE SUPPORT AT D8" *'roger that pawn 3 we are sending a queen ballistic missile at D8'*
‚I‘m only 600 rated.‘ yeah. That‘s where such strategies still work
Explanation unclear my opponent exploded
*Explanation nuclear
Top chess reference?
Nah fam, mission accomplished
@@koroldan lol
Super easy.....barely an inconvenience.
Me :"sacs knight"
Opponent":moves queen out of fork"
Me:no no no put that back
take the rook
underrated comment 😂😂
@@ahmadmazbouh thanks
@@CabbagepuIt you made me laugh xD
@@GrowBullet happy to hear that
Everybody gangsta until the opponent realises they're only a pawn down
i love how it all starts with a Black opening i must have missed this
@@Epidemike right? must be chess 2.0 where black moves first lol
Actually white made a random first move that didn't get in the way of this gambit.
It starts with white moving their knight, wdym
so the board is weird at ten seconds to show the black pawn move h3 is the first move for white but then it switches boards to where pawn is back to h2. so i dont know why but he did switch the board to where black moved first somehow.
> try to use a new chess strategy
> lose on your first match
> refuse to elaborate
“Your opponent has got to be dumb, but not stupid”
the trick is finding people who even know or care to play chess then wipe the floor fun isnt it
@@redlight3932
Your average person will absolutely sit down to play chess, tf you mean? One of, if not THE most popular boardgame on the planet.
XD I love this
@@Rad-Dude63andathird everyone knows it, but not everyone plays it
I tried 8 times at 800 elo and every time some stupid idiot did some dumb move still won most of my games
such is the nature of gambits, if your foe knows the gambit they can decline, meaning you ruin your own position for no gain, or if they're bad at the game, they won't know know what a good move is to fall for the trap of the gambit.
@@randombrit13 and if they know anything about chess they will not fall for that
@@jere1372 eh tru, they can also be good enough to see through the trap.
I am the stupid idiot :) that's why I quit chess lmao, just wasn't really improving
everything relies on "they most likely moove their pawn to attack your knight" wich is a blunder, but ill try it
This... you found the part where i breaks down. You dont have to be especially good to think 2 moves ahead on the one single piece your considering moving to threaten... some people will fall for this, but not many, and this is the very beginning of being able to play chess effectively(think 1-2 moves in advance for singular pieces)
edit : after actively playing this opening (and also the black variant) i see a 5% sucess because absolutly no one defends the pawn with the knight, andBUT when this opening works, it feels great
One problem is to find an opponent in the middle of the curve...
End of the curve they'll just see right through it, start of the curve will baffles you instead
"now your knight's looking like a bit of a problem for your opponent"
*the overextended knight doing absolutely nothing on the g5 square:*
my brain just realized how foul of a feeling black must have after that
we need a chess anime that exaggerates openings to this exact degree
You can watch the chess scene in "No Game No Life"
I love e5
e4 e5 and i respond you eith Nc3!! Get kicked for some vienna gambit that i have memorized the whole line
No wonder this has never worked on me. I don't see the knight as a threat.
A lot of people in here are saying their opponents aren't good enough to play the right moves for this when h6 is a nonsensical move in that position lol
When I was playing chess on a chess team in grade school, we figured not many players can play the game effectively without their queen so my team learned how to play without their queen and how to trade queens as fast as possible. We didn't make state championships but we did beat our greatest rival school and the #1 player in the league.
Jokes on you, I usually just move pieces around without thinking 😅👍
I keep my next move a mystery, even to myself.
"to confuse your enemy, you must first confuse yourself"
I feel personally offended by this video and the comment section in general. As a professional chess player, I can guarantee you that no one over 500 elo will fall for this dumb trick. Anyone that's "quite skilled at this game" will see Kxf7 and won't play h6, as the knight isn't really doing anything there and it violates the basic knowledge of developing your pieces. Even if someone did play h6, no one with more than 20 seconds in the clock would take the knight. The only scenario I can see this working is in a 500 elo (or less) bullet game.
So you have to find someone who is smart enough to make these moves, but not enough to recognise the icbm gambit
OLD PEOPLE
a 200 elo would realize what their goal is before losing their pieces
Which is essentially like 2% chance to happen even when you're in that sweet spot of the best chances for this to happen because black can make so many other moves that change things up and requires white to improvise (even if they get a lead)
Instructions unclear: My rival knows what to do.
They didn't take the bait 😂😂😂
Opponent: Does this
Me: All pawns ahead!
This is the perfect type of humor for me, I do not care at all about chess but I needed to see that intercontenental missile
I did this once when I was like 13 in a school chess tournament. I’d never _heard_ of this actual strategy, I was just thinking 2-3 moves ahead and thought I’d try something ambitious. It worked.
That never happened.
...huh. turns out my "YEET THE QUEEN" strategy has actually a name that is even better.
nah. ur name is better.
This one and the checkmate in 3 moves are nice to open up, but they're also so common almost all players will immediately counter you instead of playing along.
Lmao just landed this right after the vid instant “waiting for player to reconnect”
Instructions unclear my opponent checkmated themselves before I can finish the combo
Thank you
Instructions unclear I accidentally lauch a real thermal nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile model b82 at greenland…what do i do
At first I was hesitant about the lost material but being up a queen kinda makes up for it. 😂
Bro why is there a PUBG main theme 💀
Civalization Theme would be fitting because he plays like it, enemy took my Knight and my Builder, send nukes.
As someone who can play chess but doesnt know the competitive strategies, I'm surprised to realize I've used this technique alot without realizing it
same before haha
You're probably just thinking of the fork attack by the knight (or specifically queen-rook forks). That is very common. This just uses _a_ knight fork, but it is not _the_ strategy/opening being used here. Pretty much nobody -whether they know chess or are clueless about chess- play this sort of opening. It's far from good and it's far from brainless, and there's no reason for people in-between to play it either unless they specifically had this strategy in mind.
Why only 3 comments this is weird usually all the other videos have tons of comments
Only challenge in this opening is find someone smart enough to do those moves but not too smart so then they dont fall for it and you make the sacrifices for nothing 😅😂
Thnx for explaining it very well, I saw these vids in other channels, but didn't understand it well
Now I understand everything!
bird?
Why only 4 comments
Count it 5
@@r3nd3r1n9 my bad at my time of counting there were 4
In Chinese chess, there is a twin leopard check mate. Using the king as a hostage while sniping other essential piece with the leopard.
"Such a sneaky move, love to see it lol."
My favorite part is how he opens up with black first...
He doesn't.
"Hah! I got your knigh-"
"I cast atomic bomb."
Being an unskilled chess player can be an advantage sometimes, the skilled player just gets an aneurysm
I discovered this when playing in high-school. I didn't know what it was called but when money or a prize was involved I saved it for the last three rounds.
1. play against a bot in another tab
2. set it to insane or the highest difficulty
3. copy your opponents move with your own chess pieces in the other tab playing against the bot
4. when the bot responds with their own move, copy that move on the tab with the human opponent
“Intercontinental missile” rolling down the stairs😂😂
Long before ICBMs even existed, this was called the Tennison gambit
Friendly tip:
After the gambit, if the opponent moves pawn e7, they prepare the dark square bishop for a check at b4. That move also activates the opponent's rook, that now threatens the queen, turning the gambit into a huge disadvantage.
Solution:
After queen takes queen, if the opponent moves pawn e7, your queen should take the opponent's b7 pawn. That way your queen guards the b column, removing the bishop threat.
Alternatively, you can move your king to f1. However, you lose castling.
Happy elo climbing 😊
This is why "beginners luck" is a thing, you start doing things unimaginable.
This was one of the first strats I figured out and used when I first started playing chess in school.
This only works if your opponent knows what theyre doing and not just moving random pieces
If your opponent is just moving random pieces, then just... win the game?
If you are a beginner at chess, you could still use a M3 Bradley BGM-71 TOW Missile
Yup, just had flashbacks of getting hit with that move in highschool. Never knew it had an actual term though lmao
As with swordplay, fancy gambits only work if your opponent is skilled
We convinced our entire generation that this is a battle that we could win.
Also works with Scandinavian move order. 1. e4 d5. 2. Nf3
Ive won a handful of games based on this strategy (that I didn’t know was an officially, named move set) where I find an opening in my opponent’s defence and load one or both of my rooks up in front of my queen. When the chamber is loaded, I send one after the other. Typically, the first rook is taken as a response, only for the second rook to respond. When or if they take the second rook, the queen is the decisive piece that garners the checkmate.
The set up is always a gamble as it has to been done subtly enough for the opponent not to notice, therefore it can take upwards of 5-10 moves to “load the chamber”.
I have a strategy I do and it works basically every time… I have not found someone competent enough to counter it. It’s really easy to counter and because I do it at the start of every game, I even straight up announce that I’m doing it… yet people still don’t defend themselves, or at least take advantage of my predictable set up.
What I’m saying is that I haven’t found anyone that would even be competent enough to let me use an ICBM on them
For me I tweaked the moves where the fork actually does work in the king can’t kill them because the knight is being protected by the bishop and only and the bishop doesn’t have to be sacrificed and a pawn as well
This is the kind of strategy that you must do to a person with a specific skill level.
If they're too bad, they won't follow the moves you planned.
If they're too good, they'll know what you're doing.
“And I’m only a ranked 600 player” and that’s where the conversation ends
You’d think ICBM only works on dumb players, but ironically it only works on smart players who will attempt to strategically counter your pieces (instead of mindlessly capturing and moving).
A very specific sequence. All other billions lead to different outcomes
Steven: "queen takes queen"
Me: that's gay.
"the heck are you doing with that?"
- last words from Bro before getting queen less
This reminds me of my colleague how said the hardest enemies in poker are the ones who don't even know what their hand means
For april fools day, it would really be funny to have moves like this exist
Queen takes Queen, the most terrifying thing I heard
Moves the other knight to add a defender to the queen.
"Roger to alpha- do not fire, i repeat do not fire. We have a hostage situation "
Lelouche cackling in the background to this
I just imagine the actual queen of England piloting a B-52 dropping bombs on the royal court of another country with her aviators on and Beethoven or sumn playin in the background
Instructions unclear..... Enemy is as dumb as i am and just randomly push any pawn to what ever spot is free....
The bait to queen's pawn would only work on total beginners.
You never sacrifice king's pawn in the opening unless you have to. Just move king's pawn up one.
After watching a video on chess 4d i really thought he was talking about a real nuke, like a cinematic where a nuke just falled on the table.
Bruh what a specific thing. I feel like they could've seen this coming
The only thing is, this only work with people who are good and play it a lot.
Someone who plays a lot of chess and is very good at it told me once : "the only opponent a chess master fears, is someone who doesnt know what theyre doing."
Whenever you try a gambit, your opponent 9/10 times knows it and punishes heavily
"Ah ja, die französische Nippeltwist-Formation!"
Actually......
It's called the Tennyson Gambit!
Works well for Blitz and Bullet Games.
Even if your opponent is able to refute the opening, there're still a lot of good variations in the middle and end games.
Loads of Fun for the Skilled and Confident player!
I've never studied chess but my friends and i used to play a lot and this was a series of moves i figured out.
My friend had foolsmated me so many times when i first started so to pull this off a few times to his complete bewilderment was very worth it
No , that doesn't bait them into playing e5, that's just what you want them to play , they re more likely to just open as you did and play a bishop in response.