Arado Ar 196 Seaplane
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 янв 2009
- The Ar 196 was a shipboard reconnaissance aircraft built by the German firm Arado starting in 1936. The next year it was selected as the winner of a design contest, and became the standard aircraft of the Kriegsmarine throughout World War II.
Наука
Thanks for the upload. Very interesting.
Looked like a nice landing in rough seas.
I have never seen this footage. Those guys were fortunate to have survived.
I believe, but don't know for sure, that Germany's Auxiliary Cruisers carried these planes also.
That is correct.
I always liked this plane. Maybe it's because the book about the Bismarck that I bought at my elementary school book sale when I was like 8 (an abridged version of Ballard's book on discovering her). Or maybe just because it's a cool plane? I hadn't realized that it used a control yoke instead of a column. Kind of odd for a plane of its configuration, isn't it? Anyway, I love all these un-sung, workhorse, "behind-the-scenes" planes that did so much during the war. So many stories you never hear.
I like the Aichi E13A (Allied nickname, 'Jake') too. probably for some of the same reasons. It also has nice lines.
@@mebeasensei me too! These two, but all the floatplanes are interesting. These two are my favorites, but I also like the He 115, the Z.506, the Do 24, the A6M2-N, the E7K, the F1M. They are all cool, and the actual operations are fascinating. So much more involved than just flying a plane from a runway.
Heres the comment about war thunder y'all looking for, and yes he's on the game
It's perfect for what it's designed for.
I'd buy one!
How
@@chaotic_pineapple How what
@@dragonbutt how would you buy it
@@chaotic_pineapple If i were born 80 years ago i'd have bought one. Granted with all the modern technology we have its probably possible to track down blueprints and build one today.
Such an odd engine failure... I guess that it has more to do with some structural failure because of the violence of the waves (and which must be easily solved simply by strengthening the frame) than because of an ill design as such.
I like that central float layout (like the one of the Vought Kingfisher, or the Nakajima A6M2N Rufe), which is probably more aerodynamic than the twin float one (yet more unstable in high waves, specially for a small plane like this), but considering that the float is also a fuel tank, it´s not funny at all when that happens and the engine falls on...
Not sure strengthening the "frame" (around the engine) would matter, or even help. The force of water hitting the propellers would be the biggest factor, which would imbalance the engine and screw up the timing and all sorts of other rotational issues to the prop shaft, etc...Point being, even if the entire engine was able to be kept in place, you'd still have the pistons, shaft, etc, catastrophically imbalanced so you might still have the thing blowing up on you, literally and figuratively, whether it was securely fastened or not. Actually, in this case it was probably better for the pilots that the engine DID fall off into the sea.
@@gavinhalm3016 If it fell off whilst the aircraft was airborne after being damaged in the takeoff they probably wouldn't have made it out, so definitely very lucky it happened before they were airborne.
Tintin ride on that plane.
Gerald Markowitz
Nope
Not even close
That aircraft had a over wing design
The plane also had a yoke
He sure did: i.pinimg.com/564x/3c/a1/49/3ca149cd318089020e811464be1fe1fd.jpg
i19.servimg.com/u/f19/13/98/34/88/hydra10.jpg
0:57 S.O.S S.O.S !!!
Perdón aqui reportando un pequeño percance,una fallita leve🤪
Where can I buy it?
Didn't this aircraft later model have to float I mean wasn't it started from 1940.
A little choppy there boys ?
This video has now 196 likes.
extinct ?
The front fell off!