Yeah, I don’t think many people would think about changing the last letter - there’s Dark, Darn and Dart too. But I think Dari and Daro would’ve scored the lowest.
Was quite surprised they accepted that when it should have been naruhito. They have not given the point before for saying it wrong. Hirohito was his grandfather.
"Fewer" and "less" mean different things. "Fewer" refers a number of individual things, while "less" means things in a heap. And Richard, you bloody well known the difference between I and me.
Yes, language changes, but do we just accept commonly misspoken bad English as acceptable. I’m thinking particularly of ‘should of, would of, could of’ now being commonly used, because of poor education, in place of ‘should’ve, would’ve, could’ve’. I don’t know where you draw the line. I presume that, over time you have to move to the incorrect version if that is how it is used by a majority of people speaking the language, no matter how much the incorrect usage offends your sensibilities.
@35:00 Ish the contestants gave the right answer and then were gaslit into thinking they gave the wrong one? I'm confused at whath appened here
Wonder if off camera they supply the missing letters to allow for accents/pronunciation?
@@Costalfisherman Ohhh that would make a lot more sense. I didn't consider it to be an editing thing.
Most of the time interpolation requires a type of licensing. And the name of Dua Lipa's album was called Future Nostalgia... Think about it.
The final questions were so hard!
I would have gone for DARI :)
Yeah, I don’t think many people would think about changing the last letter - there’s Dark, Darn and Dart too. But I think Dari and Daro would’ve scored the lowest.
'Nirohito', mixing father and son. Guess they're not always strict on pronunciation
Was quite surprised they accepted that when it should have been naruhito. They have not given the point before for saying it wrong. Hirohito was his grandfather.
"Fewer" and "less" mean different things. "Fewer" refers a number of individual things, while "less" means things in a heap.
And Richard, you bloody well known the difference between I and me.
Yes, language changes, but do we just accept commonly misspoken bad English as acceptable. I’m thinking particularly of ‘should of, would of, could of’ now being commonly used, because of poor education, in place of ‘should’ve, would’ve, could’ve’. I don’t know where you draw the line.
I presume that, over time you have to move to the incorrect version if that is how it is used by a majority of people speaking the language, no matter how much the incorrect usage offends your sensibilities.