@stevelehto I have a question for you. Would deadly force not be justified? When someone illegally enters your home and assaults you, does that not entitle you to use lethal force to defend yourself? I would seem irrelevant that the criminal assailant has a badge.
when the police officer said "now I own your house" what he really meant was: now I own you, I can do whatever I want with you, your children and your dog. I can commit any abuse I want.
Yeah, I saw it there first too. That cop is operating with zero fear of consequences. Pretty much encapsulates what is wrong with policing in America right now. The police have no fear of consequences if they violate your rights, they know they won’t be held accountable.
He won't. He'll get prom9ted because the police believe it's us against them. Things like this and the lack of other police calling it out show that all cops approve of it. Use police logic against them.
This video has been making the rounds on the police auditing community. In some ways I find it comical because the whole reason why those feared auditing channels exist is because of videos like this becoming known to the public.
Please keep in mind; this is riverside county sheriff department. The same agency that arrested a man who recorded a deputy assault his dog/partner. The da has not dropped the charges filed against the man who recorded this event.
The Department is trying to save their asses by adding charges. He did it. They own it. It was on Independence Day and the kid was probably lighting fire crackers which would be the cause for the disturbance. The firecrackers may be OK to do because of Independence Day exceptions. Depending what the City ordinances and exceptions and times for Independence Day are.
That's a good idea. " I suppose after this is over you're gonna take off that uniform so we are gonna give you something you can't take off " - inglorious bastards -
She was arrested for "resisting arrest". How do you get arrested for resisting arrest if you were never under arrest thus couldn't resist that arrest? That's messed up.
@AdolfHitlerson-j9d 0 seconds ago this kind of situation happens only because americans have become lazy and complacent with its servants ! if this was dealt with the proper way, within one minute, we the taxpayers would not be paying for court costs AND THIS BAD COP would never ever ever ever be able to do this AGAIN Reply
I have been in policing for 27 years. I hold the rank of Lieutenant. This deputy should be charged with breaking and entering in the nighttime, assault and battery while armed, child endangerment, and violation of civil rights. If one of my officers did this, I would immediately move for termination.
@@kenhawkins1033 - I disagree. They actually seem to wonder, and to resent how they are viewed. They honestly don't seem to understand why the public is increasingly hostile to them. I know someone who became a cop in a big city. The training he took cast the press as an enemy of the cops.
Hello, I'm a resident of Rivercide. Yes, I've changed the spelling intentionally. The D.A. , the sheriff, the deputy are all responsible. This is a clear portrait of how these corrupt power hungry people operate in this county. Arming code enforcement, tax collectors etc. The D.A. and sheriff are deaf to complaints from those of us who reside here.
Your next election, vote your district attorney out, and vote for those who believe in true law and order, and not criminal police or deputies or sheriffs.
Here is how you can enact change if you can get enough people and businesses behind you: Petition heavily for local residents and businesses to stop their property tax payments until government steps in and does something about the issues. Money is the only thing that these people bow down to, so that is how you have to fight.
got woken up from a nap one afternoon with a pounding on the door with his flashlight or something really loud and when I open the door, they said someone had placed the 911 call and they barged in and it was stupid and they had the wrong address and they didn’t go to the wrong address and it was like wtf !
@@dcraexon Roofing company comes to a house and takes off the shingles and everything down to the plywood, then realizes they had the wrong address, so they left. It too a civil lawsuit to get them to pay for the replacement because they didn't leave a note and when a neighbor had their company truck on a doorbell camera, refused to come to do the right thing. The quality of character is revealed by the response to a mistake.
A rare third amendment violation, and it's all captured on video!!! An armed agent of the state barged into her house (with no warrant) and proclaimed to "own the place now"!!!
when the homeowner stated " I know my rights" and the officer responded "I don't care about your rights" while he was breaking her constitutional rights, ended his qualified immunity. Then being armed and stating "I own your house" is just icing on the cake. Anything short of the officer being charged with armed breaking and entering and kidnapping with be a misjustice. Also, the homeowner will own the officer's house.
a former relative of mine once anwered the question "Is it ok for cops to break the law to enforce the same law?" Her answer was an unqualified yes. She and the reason she is no longer a relative (for boss at the time, another "officer") not only were fired from the force but ran to the other side of the country to get out of the limelight during an investigation into their behavior... so yeah, it's not trained, it's learned behavior.
Qualified immunity should also apply to actions that occur in the blink of an eye (instinctive reactions), not to deliberate actions where the officer had time to reassess their options. Charging the officer is a separate process (and won’t help the victim), but a civil suit should also be filed against the department. This will be settled before even reaching a grand jury. They (department/city/county) will go make this away without much noise.
@@maplifiers 100% Police can do whatever they want, and they do so, because they are never held accountable for it beyond being told "don't do that again, or we'll tell you 'don't do that again'"
The deputy may get thrown under the bus as this garners more and more attention. The sheriff's office would do it because his department could not withstand closer scrutiny.
Sorry, cops are held to a lower standard than the average citizen. That's why they get away with behavior that would put any other citizen in prison for years.
@@glee21012Exactly - they probably wouldn't survive long enough to even get a single court appearance. And the police chief certainly wouldn't be making excuses for their behavior.
this deputy is lucky that the resident of the house wasn't in a position to protect their home with lethal force. he could have made himself a victim of the castle doctrine, and deleted himself from the game of life.
@@TheRoadhammer379 Tell me you’re clueless without telling me you’re clueless. This is the state of Rodney King, police are more likely to be prosecuted here than anywhere else.
So Ironic that a Citizen getting their Rights Wrongfully Violated on the 4th or July by those who swore to Protect the Constitution has become par for the course in Murica! 🦅🇺🇸🦅 Also, “Noise Complaint” on the 4th of July? Gee, who would DARE to make Noise on such a typically quiet Holiday?!? 🤷♂️🤦♂️
The same sheriff that cost the tax payer millions in wrongful deaths at the jail? You expect that guy to fix the problem? Maybe google the subject matter you speak on sometime, you might not sound foolish next time.
You never find a department with a single bad cop. A single bad cop would be fired. If you find one bad cop, the whole department is rotten, from the chief who didn't fire him, to the cops who willingly continues to work with the corrupt cops
Really disappointed in Sheriff Chad Bianco. He's not helping his campaign by making up lame excuses for this officer blatantly violating a citizen's constitutional rights.
You think the prosecutor was told anything but what was on the criminal cop's report? Not an excuse for poor procedure, but the lady's public defender should have stormed into that prosecutor's office and made the SOB watch that video.
@@daverobson3084 And point out, that the video will be evidence in court - either watch it now and correct things or face more egg on your face in court :)
The prosecutor of almost any court serves AUTHORITY...and the "authority" doesn't give two craps about 'right and wrong', because AUTHORITY is everything about POWER. This is considered crazy talk until you watch it happen OVER AND OVER again.
That this happened on the 4th of July, a day we celebrate breaking away from a tyrannical government that did things exactly like this? The irony is palpable.
@@kennethsouthard6042 Unfortunately, lawsuits cost money and right now all her money will be going to keeping her out of jail on these trumped up charges. She'll likely be forced to plead guilty to a lessor charge because that is the way the system works. And if she does that then she cannot sue because she'll have admitted her wrongdoing. You must forget "fair." There is no fair there is no justice. Just ask people like Steven Slevin in New Mexico, Adam Tramell in West Milwaukee or Anthony Mitchell in Alabama.
The sheriff needs to be removed also. What he is really saying about the video being viral now is we don't care about violating the constitution until the public is made aware.
@@Freddisred so i disagree because there the only police auotheiry with direct accountability because ANYONE who isnt a felon. can be a one AND is the only command member who is directly voted in and out
@ddlar56 - That is so true! We are way beyond a training issue. What I keep asking myself is . . . How did this deputy come to believe that once he gains entry to a home he "owns it now"? And he's convinced that he owns the lady as well? Where does this deputy get the confidence that he has the authority to do any of this? If you watch the video, right after he gains entry he not only believes he owns the home, he also demonstrates the belief that he owns this woman. Because without any further provocation he physically takes control of her as if she is now his property.
Precisely. The pigs don't care about your rights, the law or their training, they are going to do whatever they want. And from my experience, the judges bias towards them.
The Sheriff doesn't care. They just last year cost the city $7.5 million for wrongful deaths in their jail system. He continues to claim they did nothing wrong. That department needs a whole house cleaning from top to bottom.
Entering a house without a warrant? Criminal trespass? False arrest? The guy wasn't immediately fired? Seriously? 5 years in prison without parole for the criminal in uniform. Termination of the County Sherriff. 1 million paid to the victim by the county.
Seems the deputy violated State charges, committed Federal Civil Rights violations, & likely department policy. The department apparently is not pleased that a video surfaced & now are attempting to deflect & shift blame & responsibility.
Pretty simple solution: 2nd Amendment. If the cop claims ownership of your house, qualified immunity goes out the window. They don't have immunity to steal your house.
Not true. Based on current case law and precedent, unless there is already a previous case in which a cop did exactly the same thing (with all the same details) and it was ruled to be unconstitutional (which you're realistically never going to find), a court will likely find that qualified immunity still applies anyway. That's just how our system currently functions, unfortunately. Also, the 2nd Amendment only gives you the right to *keep* arms. It does not give you any constitutional rights to actually _shoot_ them at anyone else (especially a cop), and you can (and will) still be prosecuted for assault/murder even if you *owning* the gun was technically constitutionally protected. And qualified immunity is purely a courtroom thing. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether you are allowed to shoot a cop or not.
@@foogod4237 Not true at all. That has recently been overruled. Also see the Floyd case where cops were convicted for preventing bystanders from intervening.
@@Joe333Smith Nothing has been "overruled". There have been one or two recent *individual cases* where people have managed to get qualified immunity overturned, but the vast majority of QI challenges, even for things that are seemingly obviously wrong, are still overwhelmingly found in favor of the police, every single day.
Sorry to say, most government officials do not respect/recognize the Constitution of the US, by passing laws and impose taxes that RESTRICT the ownership and use of arms.
Another cop who belongs in prison for armed home invasion, violation of civil rights, kidnapping, assault, and battery. 25 years in federal prison should readjust his attitude sufficiently.
Based on cop logic not opening your door will now be categorized as obstruction. Not sitting on the ground is resisting. Filming the incident is disorderly.
Don't believe the police when they say they have a warrant. If they have a warrant, they will be happy to break the door down. If they are lying, which is legal to do, they might not break your door down.
Ah yes. The whole it's the media's fault because no one would be mad if they didn't know it happened argument. I honestly don't know how someone can possibly make that argument and think it in any way makes sense.
The police only exist to protect corporate interests - that's why you get arrested for stealing $100 out of your boss's cash register *but your boss doesn't get arrested for stealing $100 out of your paycheck.*
We desperately need a case like this to get to the Supreme Court so it can be ruled that officers putting a foot in the doorway to prevent homeowners from closing their door as unlawful. There are so many videos of this happening which is absolutely a violation of the absolute most protected space a citizen has INSIDE the threshold of their home. It is abused grotesquely by police and has to stop.
One could argue that's just standard police-talk - At least here in Finland the police ALWAYS 'suspect', even if a criminal was caught in a bank holding a gun and a bag of cash. However, they've not done anything for two months so heh, it seems very much like they are trying to wait out the outrage and do exactly nothing about it.
This deputy was CLEARLY NOT a "New" recruit. He's been on the job for YEARS. Imagine what he's gotten away with prior and subsequent to this incident that led him to have this complete disregard for the law and Civil Liberties. The department is working out how they can delay, cover and sweep it under the rug.
I fear to imagine how he treats his family behind closed doors.. and perhaps with the complicity of the dirty "sheriff "..? If he acts this abusively towards his family, and his victim called the police, would his "blue brothers" actually stop his abuse, or just let him off, aiding and abetting the criminal acts..?
This officer is beyond salvage. No additional training will help. He is a danger to the community. Will senior leadership recognize this? I’m not hopeful
Police officers should face a decade in prison for intering a residence without a warrent. The problem is that judges seem to never have read the fourth ammendment.
I disagree with that. I think the problem is the idea that when a police officer breaks the law it's not considered illegal because they use the work "unlawful", as if it means something different. kind of like how they use the word "detain" instead of what it really is, imprisonment, when referencing someone who was arrested with no charges to get around the 6th amendment
GTFO Steve. I'm so tired of "they need more training". Bull. They intentionally train them on how to skirt the law of civil rights. They don't need MORE training, they need an over-haul and the PROPER training. Teaching a class on how to yell "STOP RESISTING! HE'S REACHING FOR MY GUN!" in case there are cameras rolling, is not the time they need to be spending on training.
"They intentionally train them on how to skirt the law of civil rights." In some places, yes. In many cases, it is simply taking the newly graduated officer/deputy from the academy and telling them to forget what they learned at the academy and "re-teaching" them how to operate under that departments, ie chief of police/sheriff's, wishes. But you are 100% correct. They don't need MORE training, the corrupt chief of police/sheriff's need to be removed so the officers/deputies can act as they were originally trained at the academy.
@@byronshepherd8415 I go into that in my standalone reply but it has been that way, the top dictates the culture, forever. If the officers/deputies on the street are doing this stuff, that means the top is pushing it through the supervisors and FTO's to those officers/deputies. By the time I left law enforcement (this was decades ago), every single chief of police and sheriff in almost every jurisdiction around my area had resigned while under FBI investigation for corruption.
Oh the blatant hypocrisy of screaming "Reserve judgement until all of the facts come out" and then screaming "That's old news" once all of the facts come out.
Modern law enforcement seems thoroughly pleased with the status quo. I have never, even once, been able to get an active duty cop to engage in any exchange about the rift between themselves and they citizenry. All I see is coverups and spineless conformity.
Yeah, there's a lot of that out there. But, Grady Judd is a shining example of what a good cop can be. Go check him out, he doesn't care who ya are, you break the law, you going down. He has arrested bad cops, bad lawyers, and bad judges as well. He doesn't care. He has singlehandedly put a serious dent into human trafficking and pdfiles activities. He is regularly taking Disney to task and arresting pdfiles on Disney campus. He Sherriff Grady Judd in Polk County Florida.
Part of the problem with cops turning on bad cops, is that the bad guy in question is armed and angry at you. This could lead to reconsideration. Doesn't make it right, but it does make it understandable.
Agreed, and the cops are angry when any negative story is in the press. They seem to honestly believe they are the good guys and are above reproach and above oversight, no matter what they do. The cops think the press is their enemy, even when the press is absolutely accurately reporting what happened. The cops, at this point, seem to think all citizens are their enemy.
@@mikefarmer4748they have been known to take out whistleblowers within their own departments. They usually define it as an accident while training or something else shady.
The deputy tried to call it exigent circumstances by saying the kid at the door fled from him. The fact that he thinks this'll hold up proves that officers' subjective experience is given way too much leeway
Especially when the determining case law for this is when police in the 1980's busted into a literal bank robber's home to arrest him without first obtaining a warrant and the supreme court of california ruled that the police were in the wrong for not first obtaining a warrant to carry out the arrest. So if police can't bust down your door for suspected bank robbery without a warrant, for sure a teenager closing the door on you doesn't even come close.
@@fnjesusfreak No, Stop making shit up. first 10 are the Bill of Rights. 27 has to do with congressional salaries, lol. Just google this. It's stuff I learned in grade school in the 70's. Come one, man
Not only is this a 4th amendment violation after being advised of her rights he specifically says “I don’t care”. Why is he an officer if he doesn’t care about the laws he swore an oath to uphold?
it is because he doesn’t care about the laws he swore an oath to uphold that his was CHOSEN to be a cop. That is who they select for. People who follow orders and believe others should only follow their orders , no matter the legality, without thinking and without refusal.
6:55 not to mention there's plenty of stories where people are assaulted or killed after somebody pretending to be in officer makes entry into their home... You would think somebody that's legitimately an officer would know and follow the rules, so when somebody's not following the rules that would be a major red flag.
US Department of Justice needs to get involved over this Deputy violating her civil rights. Criminal charges need to be filed against him as well. He should never be allowed to be trusted with a badge again. Sheriff's Department needs to be investigated by outside authorities.
States that have Civilian Review Boards are a joke,just another paracite in government; most times , Review Boards scratch each other's back; that's how the paracite grift works.
@@glee21012 Yes, but there are ways to prevent that. 1 to 2 year terms, elected by the people, limited to 2 terms, etc. Just because nobody currently does it right, because it's an appeasement measure and not meant to be effective, doesn't mean it can't be done correctly.
@markg7030 She was ripped out of her home in the night by an armed assailant in front of her kids. She and the kids will not have feel good about that even if they do get money. The police (arresting officer and leadership) are the only ones here who have little reason to care. Even if the cop is fired, there's a department out there who will take him in with open arms. And they aren't paying the bill.
At this point, the homeowner should be thanking this officer for paying her entire mortgage for her!!! And the local taxpayers should be furious that they will now be forced to hand over thousands of their dollars because this officer didn't care about the law.
The LEO says "I own your house" he should have said "After my actions you will own your house". Payday in the near future for the victim of LEO violating Civil Rights!
The most gross violation of the Constitution. Your home is your castle and that cop had no warrant, no extenuating circumstances, no permission, and no probable cause to enter or arrest her. The most blatant example of police state behavior captured on camera. I hope the cop gets fired and the woman sues him and has a nice pay day for this gross violation.
This isn't new...the video evidence...is new-ish, COPS have been behaving this way forever. Hope, is in that their will be change. Reality, the LONG LONG LONG standing accepted behavior of COPS, is this is not going to change... talk to the poor, COPS have been throwing them around since ALWAYS...can't afford a lawyer or now the cameras...so when they do get caught its consider some rare event. The worlds largest prison population is in the "land of the free". 25% of the worlds prisoners and 4% of the worlds population...WE WORSHIP WAR AND AUTHORITY HERE.
No it's not. There are millions of police encounters every year and very few end up like this. This officer needs to be fired but it's far from the norm.
Only if you have a really bad lawyer. All police are ignorant of the law until they need to write up a report for your crimes. The most the city will do is now hire an outside firm to come in and do training.
@AdolfHitlerson-j9d 0 seconds ago this kind of situation happens only because americans have become lazy and complacent with its servants ! if this was dealt with the proper way, within one minute, we the taxpayers would not be paying for court costs AND THIS BAD COP would never ever ever ever be able to do this AGAIN Reply
Don’t lump all law enforcement together! There are more good guys than bad guys in the field. MOST have great respect and treat people right, the best they can. Spend some time watching police body cam videos and you will earn a totally new respect for them and what they deal with daily. It’s the most thankless job there is.
That deputy is so lucky he didn't do this where I grew up in WV. One similar event happened and within two minutes there were five neighbors with rifles leveled the two deputies overstepping their bounds.
@@saber12 It’s for this very reason that open carrying of firearms was outlawed in California. The Black Panthers back in the day would always peacefully appear with rifles any time a cop pulled over someone in their neighborhoods, just to make sure the cops didn’t overstep. This was too much for the powerbrokers so they changed the law. I believe Ronald Reagan was the one who signed the legislation.
A few years ago in Midland, Texas a cop entered a home in the early morning hours and set off the house alarm. The home owner responded by shooting the intruder, killing him. The home owner was charged with manslaughter, however a jury found him not guilty. And that was Texas where nearly everyone has a gun.😮
That reminds me of a video I seen years ago. This one guy is constantly being harassed by drug dealers. He keeps calling the police who do nothing. Drug dealers even shoot up his house. Guy buys an AR type rifle. Some time later, police storm the house in the early hours of the morning. Don’t remember why. Guy jumps out of bed and starts shooting away towards the front door. 3 police officers were hit but all survived. In court, his lawyer got him off explaining the he had a right to defend his home from dangerous drug dealers. Police never announced themselves before breaking into the house. The guy thought it was drug dealers trying to un alive him.
From a legal perspective, since thr officer is not acting in any stretch of a legal capacity, this is effectively a home invasion. Would the homeowners not be legally allowed to handle this situation with force just as they would with non-officer during a home invasion?
Yes, a man with a gun invades your home you can defend it. But you better be sure you have all the video evidence to back you up. Not sure how it would go if the cop didn't have a gun in his hand but I've seen some people get off when they defended themselves after a no-knock warrant was served at the wrong house. It might have been the case in Louisville that the police killed a woman when the man was trying to defend.
Yes, by the letter of the law, but judges/other officers will act in the "color" of the law and would throw the book at you for "harming an officer". Even in "Stand your ground" states, homeowners who did get scared/shoot were convicted. It's 100% "Rules for thee, not for me"
So, why not charge the cop with felony PC459, armed home invasion in the furtherance of the felony of false imprisonment PC 236? Since he moved her from the point of the offense, might add kidnapping.
might add kidnapping? No, definitely add kidnapping. Also, because he took the mom but left the kids, child endangerment. He had no proof the dad was there.
Our law makers and SCOTUS have let us down in the fact that we live in an uncontrolled police state that we now live in . End qualified immunity ASAP .
Not in Seattle (anymore). Officers are not allowed to lie even during an investigation without express written authorization from a lieutenant or higher and even then it has to be absolutely necessary to protect an investigation
And assault with illegal arrest, I assume the officer did not tell the owner, flat out lying. Showing either unaware of property law or just didn’t care. The sheriff has video from both parties and is backing the policeman. In fact, I know of one policeman who acted unprofessional when verbally giving the homeowner a complaint. The officer was not neutral during his visit, which was at about 10pm.
I have been arrested for resisting arrest in my younger dumber days. That was the entire charge. The logic of that one and only charge is mind blowing.
The thing that is mind blowing is that the cop decided to hook you up by only charging you with resisting and you still act like he is the one in the wrong.
@christosdeschaine9444 Wa moment. I'm confused. Is CA supposed to be the state with frightening ultra-liberalism, or the one with frightening ultra-rightist police?
Use code LEHTOSLAW50 to get 50% OFF your first Factor box plus 20% off your next month of orders at bit.ly/4bZliWT !
@stevelehto I have a question for you. Would deadly force not be justified? When someone illegally enters your home and assaults you, does that not entitle you to use lethal force to defend yourself? I would seem irrelevant that the criminal assailant has a badge.
I’m pretty sure that after you brought the Factor box inside, Factor owns your house.
Maybe the cop was trying out that new "civil asset forfeiture" things that's all the rage? Now that I'm in your house, I own it.
Actually, recent 9th circuit appeals case, USA v. Daniel Brown, running from police doesn't furnish reasonable suspicion.
when the police officer said "now I own your house" what he really meant was: now I own you, I can do whatever I want with you, your children and your dog. I can commit any abuse I want.
So trespassing, assault and abuse of authority.
Where are the consequences?
Hopefully it comes from a 2nd amendment practicing citizen.
Most likely the sob will get a pay raise and promotion, the city will get the living shi+ sued out of it.
At most, a two week paid vacation along with a promotion. Earning the hate, one citizen at a time.
Can’t have those! It’s the coercive arm of the crooked government
The sovereign domestic terrorist are charging the woman with like four charges
When the police are free to break the law, there is no law.
Some people ARE above the law. Ask the Supreme court which ones have immunity.
There is no law. Hasn’t been for a while.
Billy Jack.... When policemen break the law, then there is no law, just a fight for survival.
"If the law doesn't matter when the police violate it, *the law doesn't actually matter."*
@@terryjwoodtds has rotted your brain
I watched this on The Civil Rights Lawyer channel. Made me so infuriated watching it. He should be fired immediately and charged.
Yeah, I saw it there first too. That cop is operating with zero fear of consequences. Pretty much encapsulates what is wrong with policing in America right now. The police have no fear of consequences if they violate your rights, they know they won’t be held accountable.
Over a noise complaint from kids playing! It's not like it was a hostage situation. Noise complaint is civil not criminal.
He won't. He'll get prom9ted because the police believe it's us against them. Things like this and the lack of other police calling it out show that all cops approve of it. Use police logic against them.
This video has been making the rounds on the police auditing community. In some ways I find it comical because the whole reason why those feared auditing channels exist is because of videos like this becoming known to the public.
I watched it on heres the deal first figured id see what steve had to say about it. will hit civil rights lawyer next
Please keep in mind; this is riverside county sheriff department. The same agency that arrested a man who recorded a deputy assault his dog/partner. The da has not dropped the charges filed against the man who recorded this event.
That SHERIFF shows us there is a PROBLEM at the very top.
Exactly
The sheriff was elected by the people so you can correct it at the next election.
@@darbyoharaan armed home invasion is exactly that...self preservation and defending one's home and family is a basic natural instinct!
(JUSTIFIED)*
I agree and just like a parent would serve time for their child's violations the sheriff should serve the time for his deputy
The Department is trying to save their asses by adding charges. He did it. They own it.
It was on Independence Day and the kid was probably lighting fire crackers which would be the cause for the disturbance. The firecrackers may be OK to do because of Independence Day exceptions. Depending what the City ordinances and exceptions and times for Independence Day are.
Criminal with a gun and badge. Go to prison in your uniform. Qualified immunity is over.
Go to jail in their uniform? That is crazy, and I approve 👍
Bet you don't Vote locally.
Nobody does. That's why he will never be punished
Im reminded of those moments in Inglorious Basterds. "You gonna take that nice uniform off when you get home, ain't ya?"
Very well said !!
That's a good idea. " I suppose after this is over you're gonna take off that uniform so we are gonna give you something you can't take off " - inglorious bastards -
She was arrested for "resisting arrest". How do you get arrested for resisting arrest if you were never under arrest thus couldn't resist that arrest? That's messed up.
@AdolfHitlerson-j9d
0 seconds ago
this kind of situation happens only because americans have become lazy and complacent with its servants ! if this was dealt with the proper way, within one minute, we the taxpayers would not be paying for court costs AND THIS BAD COP would never ever ever ever be able to do this AGAIN
Reply
Are you new here? Were you born yesterday? STOP RESISTING!!!!
In some jurisdictions, you actually have the right to resist an unlawful arrest, although it usually does not contribute to your physical safety.
Yeah it’s messed up but they do it all the time
It's callee "a police state", it was present but far lesser fifty years ago, think "Kent State", four dead in Ohio.
Let’s not leave out the corrupt prosecutor who has not yet dropped the charges against this lady.
I have been in policing for 27 years. I hold the rank of Lieutenant. This deputy should be charged with breaking and entering in the nighttime, assault and battery while armed, child endangerment, and violation of civil rights. If one of my officers did this, I would immediately move for termination.
You are a good man.
But he did it in "good faith" LOL
@graysonwagner1855 Good faith meaning that his department and the judicial system will back him.
Title 18, Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This cop committed a federal crime, *but nobody cares.*
You are exactly the same as this deputy. No such thing as a good cop
And they wonder why people hate police
"They" don't wonder at all. "They" do not care in the least! I can't deny that anymore.
@@kenhawkins1033many ENJOY it!
They don't wonder. They are corrupt sociopaths.
I hate most of the government period.
@@kenhawkins1033 - I disagree. They actually seem to wonder, and to resent how they are viewed. They honestly don't seem to understand why the public is increasingly hostile to them.
I know someone who became a cop in a big city. The training he took cast the press as an enemy of the cops.
We need mandatory minimum sentences for official misconduct
A minimum of 10 years day for day at Xtra hard labor , no days off including sickness.
There are mandatory minimums. They are a paid vacation and a promotion.
General population with a badge on for a year
Hello, I'm a resident of Rivercide. Yes, I've changed the spelling intentionally. The D.A. , the sheriff, the deputy are all responsible. This is a clear portrait of how these corrupt power hungry people operate in this county. Arming code enforcement, tax collectors etc. The D.A. and sheriff are deaf to complaints from those of us who reside here.
The problem is socialists, which is everyone in government, EVERY SINGLE ONE.
Your next election, vote your district attorney out, and vote for those who believe in true law and order, and not criminal police or deputies or sheriffs.
Here is how you can enact change if you can get enough people and businesses behind you: Petition heavily for local residents and businesses to stop their property tax payments until government steps in and does something about the issues. Money is the only thing that these people bow down to, so that is how you have to fight.
When anyone, including government officials, illegally enter a house, that is a crime.
If they have a gun in my state trespassing is a felony, 😂
@@EnthalpyAndEntropy It's time illegal acts are held accountable, be it civilians or government agents.
got woken up from a nap one afternoon with a pounding on the door with his flashlight or something really loud and when I open the door, they said someone had placed the 911 call and they barged in and it was stupid and they had the wrong address and they didn’t go to the wrong address and it was like wtf !
@@dcraexon Roofing company comes to a house and takes off the shingles and everything down to the plywood, then realizes they had the wrong address, so they left. It too a civil lawsuit to get them to pay for the replacement because they didn't leave a note and when a neighbor had their company truck on a doorbell camera, refused to come to do the right thing.
The quality of character is revealed by the response to a mistake.
only if the officer is charged
They're "defending" themselves saying it's a month old but that's actually telling on themselves that they didn't do anything about it for a month.
I feel like a month is not even that long?
Going on three months now. 😡
"Those are our crimes from months ago! Everyone knows our crimes from months ago don't count!"
-That sheriff, probably
She must have had the Worst lawyer in the World! Why did it take that long, and why would you go on trial without it? And What Happened To Her Kids!
Was she behind bars for a month without being charged?
"I own your house now."
No, you've escalated trespassing to a violation of the 3rd Amendment by quartering yourself in her house.
A rare third amendment violation, and it's all captured on video!!! An armed agent of the state barged into her house (with no warrant) and proclaimed to "own the place now"!!!
That was another reason why the 2nd amendment was put in
@@gmac1653 -- Ironic that you said it this way. I've used the third amendment to explain the 2A multiple times.
More like the fifth. This isn’t t just quartering, this is a taking
@PrimeCypher it's both. 3rd and 4th amendments until he said he owned it. Now it's a 5a.
when the homeowner stated " I know my rights" and the officer responded "I don't care about your rights" while he was breaking her constitutional rights, ended his qualified immunity. Then being armed and stating "I own your house" is just icing on the cake. Anything short of the officer being charged with armed breaking and entering and kidnapping with be a misjustice. Also, the homeowner will own the officer's house.
"The only reason people are upset is because they found out about it."
"Our reputation is being ruined because people are telling the truth about us!!"
@@ianbattles7290 "Damn it, it's getting hard to just lie on the reports!"
"Wah! We're all just such babies! You caught us with our pants down and we want your *sympatheeeeeee* "
How dare they find out about our callous treatment of civil rights.....
At this point one can assume that police are trained to break the law.
They are. Most of them at least. They’re trained to use dishonesty to get a confession
They are trained to circumvent the law
There are private LEO training courses who specifically teach you how to violate people’s rights.
There are multiple videos of police destroying cameras and hiding their identity on purpose.
a former relative of mine once anwered the question "Is it ok for cops to break the law to enforce the same law?" Her answer was an unqualified yes. She and the reason she is no longer a relative (for boss at the time, another "officer") not only were fired from the force but ran to the other side of the country to get out of the limelight during an investigation into their behavior... so yeah, it's not trained, it's learned behavior.
The video was shocking. The officer should be criminally charged and lose qualified immunity
Qualified immunity should also apply to actions that occur in the blink of an eye (instinctive reactions), not to deliberate actions where the officer had time to reassess their options. Charging the officer is a separate process (and won’t help the victim), but a civil suit should also be filed against the department. This will be settled before even reaching a grand jury. They (department/city/county) will go make this away without much noise.
Absolutely nothing will happen. We live in a police state.
@@maplifiers 100% Police can do whatever they want, and they do so, because they are never held accountable for it beyond being told "don't do that again, or we'll tell you 'don't do that again'"
The deputy may get thrown under the bus as this garners more and more attention. The sheriff's office would do it because his department could not withstand closer scrutiny.
@@eveishard2334It's not even necessarily telling them not to do it again -- don't get caught on video doing it again!
The deputy, the sheriff, and the DA who brought the charges should all lose their jobs.
And homes.
The deputy should be trained by serving time for criminal trespass and kidnapping.
Sorry, cops are held to a lower standard than the average citizen. That's why they get away with behavior that would put any other citizen in prison for years.
No training needed. Should be fired an charged with burglary of a occupied residence
Don't forget the Illegally and forcefully taking ownership of someone's property while armed. "I own this house right now"
@@penrodautorepair3170That’s the joke.
Training should also include huge fines, and how to fill out a 7-11 application.
What would happen to an armed citizen who barged into a cop's house and proclaimed to "own the place now"?
Pew?
@@glee21012Exactly - they probably wouldn't survive long enough to even get a single court appearance. And the police chief certainly wouldn't be making excuses for their behavior.
this deputy is lucky that the resident of the house wasn't in a position to protect their home with lethal force. he could have made himself a victim of the castle doctrine, and deleted himself from the game of life.
It would be good night irean
His armed coworkers would show up to back him up.
Home invasion, assault, and kidnapping under color of law.
it's Cali, nothing will happen
Exactly. Based on his illegal actions, I would have no trouble justifying the homeowner's use of deadly force.
Treason!!!
@@TheRoadhammer379 Tell me you’re clueless without telling me you’re clueless. This is the state of Rodney King, police are more likely to be prosecuted here than anywhere else.
@@brentfarvors192- Look up the definition of treason. This doesn't qualify.
So Ironic that a Citizen getting their Rights Wrongfully Violated on the 4th or July by those who swore to Protect the Constitution has become par for the course in Murica! 🦅🇺🇸🦅
Also, “Noise Complaint” on the 4th of July? Gee, who would DARE to make Noise on such a typically quiet Holiday?!? 🤷♂️🤦♂️
A real Benedict Arnold
This guy should never be able to be a law enforcement officer anywhere ever again.
And got to jail for 3&4 amendment violation's.
He should be in jail. His boss, the local Sheriff, should never be allowed to be a LEO ever again.
The charges haven't been dropped yet because they are leverage against a lawsuit. It's never because it is the right thing to do.
Let the trial move forward and have a jury trial. Wonder how that will turn out?
I wouldn't settle, allowing them to settle these suits is partly how they sweep things under the rug.
@@timb7775 Imagine if they had a trial and suppressed the video. This will get expensive.This could be Institute for Justice material.
@timb7775 yes, she'd probably be aquitted, but it also costs her a ton of money, time, and emotional distress. The process is a punishment.
@admthrawnuru the process is the punishment is good point which I forgot about.
If the deputy doesn't get fired and arrested in one smooth motion, the Sherrif needs to be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a deputy.
The same sheriff that cost the tax payer millions in wrongful deaths at the jail? You expect that guy to fix the problem? Maybe google the subject matter you speak on sometime, you might not sound foolish next time.
He also stepped foot inside the home and said he owned it, that sounds like conversion to me.
Charge the sheriff with accessory to the crime or obstruction of justice for his lack of action.
It sounds like a conspiracy to me.
You never find a department with a single bad cop.
A single bad cop would be fired.
If you find one bad cop, the whole department is rotten, from the chief who didn't fire him, to the cops who willingly continues to work with the corrupt cops
Really disappointed in Sheriff Chad Bianco. He's not helping his campaign by making up lame excuses for this officer blatantly violating a citizen's constitutional rights.
How the living hell did a prosecutor accept this????? This was blatantly unconstitutional in every aspect.
You think the prosecutor was told anything but what was on the criminal cop's report? Not an excuse for poor procedure, but the lady's public defender should have stormed into that prosecutor's office and made the SOB watch that video.
Exactly I'm amazed this lasted a month and wasn't dropped by the prosecutor the next day. They must be just as corrupt as the sheriff department.
@@somebodyelse6673 Or, if they wouldn't watch it, plaster it all over every social media and news cast they could.
@@daverobson3084 And point out, that the video will be evidence in court - either watch it now and correct things or face more egg on your face in court :)
The prosecutor of almost any court serves AUTHORITY...and the "authority" doesn't give two craps about 'right and wrong', because AUTHORITY is everything about POWER. This is considered crazy talk until you watch it happen OVER AND OVER again.
That this happened on the 4th of July, a day we celebrate breaking away from a tyrannical government that did things exactly like this? The irony is palpable.
How many people think the city will threaten her with CPS and taking away her children to blackmail her into NOT suing?
Robert - oh yes - I'm sure the authorities are thinking about that!
I think that 2A was written to prevent and solve these problems.
In that case, she might as well sue, as they will still do that anyway.
@@jasonshults368Literally no one in this country uses their second amendment rights like what you're suggesting.
@@kennethsouthard6042 Unfortunately, lawsuits cost money and right now all her money will be going to keeping her out of jail on these trumped up charges. She'll likely be forced to plead guilty to a lessor charge because that is the way the system works. And if she does that then she cannot sue because she'll have admitted her wrongdoing. You must forget "fair." There is no fair there is no justice. Just ask people like Steven Slevin in New Mexico, Adam Tramell in West Milwaukee or Anthony Mitchell in Alabama.
The officer must be fired get his officer credentials revoked and convicted of violent felony with 100 years of prisons
The sheriff needs to be removed also. What he is really saying about the video being viral now is we don't care about violating the constitution until the public is made aware.
Sheriff is elected only way to remove is vote him out
Sheriffs in general have outlasted the utility of the position, we don't need it.
Abso-fricken-lutely!
@Freddisred disagree. Constitutionally Sherrifs ate the most authoritive and the most accountable to the local population.
@@Freddisred so i disagree because there the only police auotheiry with direct accountability because ANYONE who isnt a felon. can be a one AND is the only command member who is directly voted in and out
Police are totally out of control. EVERYWHERE!
And the prosecutors..... BEcause they refuse to do the right thing - charge the cops.
I think you're overreacting a bit. There are *ssh*les in every profession, and corrupt *ssh*les as well.
Don't damn the good ones along with the bad.
Largest criminal enterprise in the world.
Absolutely, I'm waiting for everyone else to figure that out. Seems like some people just can't learn until it happens to them.
You got that right. In Sydney a cop was reported to have said. “The law is what I say it is, I am the law.”
I am so tired of people calling for training when police officers abuse their power. We are way beyond that.
Amen.
Agreed..let's spend tax payer money to train something they should already know
@ddlar56 - That is so true! We are way beyond a training issue.
What I keep asking myself is . . . How did this deputy come to believe that once he gains entry to a home he "owns it now"? And he's convinced that he owns the lady as well?
Where does this deputy get the confidence that he has the authority to do any of this?
If you watch the video, right after he gains entry he not only believes he owns the home, he also demonstrates the belief that he owns this woman. Because without any further provocation he physically takes control of her as if she is now his property.
Precisely. The pigs don't care about your rights, the law or their training, they are going to do whatever they want.
And from my experience, the judges bias towards them.
This is a snowball rolling down a hill now. At some point it will hit critical mass.
That lady hit the jackpot. Unfortunately the taxpayers will have to pick up the tab.
The Sheriff doesn't care. They just last year cost the city $7.5 million for wrongful deaths in their jail system. He continues to claim they did nothing wrong. That department needs a whole house cleaning from top to bottom.
ALL of government at all levels needs a house cleaning. But severe penalties need to be meted out or we are pissing into the wind
This county needs to elect a new sheriff.
@@robertsteinbach7325 country too
@@warrenklaus-tm1oonah.. Let's keep VOTING then BEG for CHANGE.. 😂😂😂
Entering a house without a warrant? Criminal trespass? False arrest? The guy wasn't immediately fired? Seriously? 5 years in prison without parole for the criminal in uniform. Termination of the County Sherriff. 1 million paid to the victim by the county.
looks like excellent promotion material?
This video is everywhere, and it should be. This deputy doesn’t have the temperament for any public facing job.
Seems the deputy violated State charges, committed Federal Civil Rights violations, & likely department policy. The department apparently is not pleased that a video surfaced & now are attempting to deflect & shift blame & responsibility.
This is a clear, justifiable use of the “stand your ground” legal theory: a hostile armed intruder at night.
Pretty simple solution: 2nd Amendment. If the cop claims ownership of your house, qualified immunity goes out the window. They don't have immunity to steal your house.
Not true. Based on current case law and precedent, unless there is already a previous case in which a cop did exactly the same thing (with all the same details) and it was ruled to be unconstitutional (which you're realistically never going to find), a court will likely find that qualified immunity still applies anyway. That's just how our system currently functions, unfortunately.
Also, the 2nd Amendment only gives you the right to *keep* arms. It does not give you any constitutional rights to actually _shoot_ them at anyone else (especially a cop), and you can (and will) still be prosecuted for assault/murder even if you *owning* the gun was technically constitutionally protected. And qualified immunity is purely a courtroom thing. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether you are allowed to shoot a cop or not.
An armed terrorist has entered your home, you have the right to defend yourself.
@@foogod4237 Not true at all. That has recently been overruled. Also see the Floyd case where cops were convicted for preventing bystanders from intervening.
@@Joe333Smith Nothing has been "overruled". There have been one or two recent *individual cases* where people have managed to get qualified immunity overturned, but the vast majority of QI challenges, even for things that are seemingly obviously wrong, are still overwhelmingly found in favor of the police, every single day.
Sorry to say, most government officials do not respect/recognize the Constitution of the US, by passing laws and impose taxes that RESTRICT the ownership and use of arms.
I want to hear that chief say "that crime happened over a month ago, let the guy go" when it's somebody they bust for drugs or a robbery.
Yeah there aren’t any criminals in jail that didn’t commit their crimes many months prior to being convicted.
Yeah, where is this casual, nonchalant attitude when the suspect *doesn't* have a badge???
Chief is following the cop statute of limitations. Four second rule, like picking up food dropped on the floor.
Another cop who belongs in prison for armed home invasion, violation of civil rights, kidnapping, assault, and battery. 25 years in federal prison should readjust his attitude sufficiently.
i wonder how how many women get melested by guys like and because of the badge women are not likely going to complain.
He'll receive some training on what he did wrong, issue a public apology and then get promoted.
@@bissetttom1738 That's usually how a lot of porn starts.
Two of those charges in the state of West Virginia have the top number of life.
@@thieupham493 I wish that wasn't true
“Now that I’m inside your house, I own your house.”
How much you want to bet that line is taken directly from a “consultant’s” training seminar.
4:08
Based on cop logic not opening your door will now be categorized as obstruction. Not sitting on the ground is resisting. Filming the incident is disorderly.
This cop should be fired, arrested, prosecuted, and sued until everything he used to own now belongs to the woman he arrested.
Id say the worse thing to come out of his mouth was "I don’t care about your rights"
**edit** He said "I don't care if you know your rights"
The same rights that he swore an oath to uphold and defend...
Saying the quiet part out loud ...why doesn't the sheriff address THAT?
Because the sheriff is not on your side. End of story.
Because he doesn't care...He has no reason to care.
I find it amazing that anyone thinks that government in California will honor their rights without the force of federal courts.
Thank you for exposing an Americans closest enemy
The lesson of course is NEVER open the door for the police unless they show you a warrant.
ABSOLUTELY TRUE 👍
Don't believe the police when they say they have a warrant. If they have a warrant, they will be happy to break the door down. If they are lying, which is legal to do, they might not break your door down.
A valid warrant
Lmao no dont argue with the cops about whether a warrant is valid that is lawyer shit for court not on the scene
Deputy would have just kicked down their door then
The sheriff had a press conference to state that no one was upset before the media let people know about it.
Ah yes. The whole it's the media's fault because no one would be mad if they didn't know it happened argument. I honestly don't know how someone can possibly make that argument and think it in any way makes sense.
Yes the lady telling him to leave definitely wasn’t upset
If that's his attitude perhaps the deputy is just following his leaders example in acting this way and both should go.
People with power usually think the biggest problem is getting caught.
Of course. Law enforcement contains mostly power hungry tyrants
The police do not exist to HELP!!!
The police only exist to protect corporate interests - that's why you get arrested for stealing $100 out of your boss's cash register *but your boss doesn't get arrested for stealing $100 out of your paycheck.*
To help themselves.
They're our prison guards. This is the land of freemasons, not the free.
Police are NOT your friends.
Some DO. Not all police officers are bad. Some are good people, and we should be glad to have them around. We'd have complete chaos otherwise.
We desperately need a case like this to get to the Supreme Court so it can be ruled that officers putting a foot in the doorway to prevent homeowners from closing their door as unlawful. There are so many videos of this happening which is absolutely a violation of the absolute most protected space a citizen has INSIDE the threshold of their home. It is abused grotesquely by police and has to stop.
The investigation of the incident shouldn't take any longer than watching the video. It's obvious how wrong the deputy was.
Yeah, it's funny how they suggest an unedited video "from a different perspective" will change what we all saw.
So to put it another way, the delay is one hundred percent providing time for a cover-up.
The investigation is to determine how to justify a claim of qualified immunity.
One could argue that's just standard police-talk - At least here in Finland the police ALWAYS 'suspect', even if a criminal was caught in a bank holding a gun and a bag of cash.
However, they've not done anything for two months so heh, it seems very much like they are trying to wait out the outrage and do exactly nothing about it.
That video is obviously AI and fake. Cops would never lie /judge
People that founded this country knew how to fix problems like that and it didn't involve overtime for more training.
"Our forefathers would be shooting back by now."
I think it is about time we take back our country.
That's why there's the 2nd Amendment.
BINGO!
This deputy was CLEARLY NOT a "New" recruit. He's been on the job for YEARS. Imagine what he's gotten away with prior and subsequent to this incident that led him to have this complete disregard for the law and Civil Liberties. The department is working out how they can delay, cover and sweep it under the rug.
I fear to imagine how he treats his family behind closed doors.. and perhaps with the complicity of the dirty "sheriff "..? If he acts this abusively towards his family, and his victim called the police, would his "blue brothers" actually stop his abuse, or just let him off, aiding and abetting the criminal acts..?
This officer is beyond salvage. No additional training will help. He is a danger to the community. Will senior leadership recognize this? I’m not hopeful
The police department got caught and is trying to get out of it. I don't see how they will.
Video cameras are a must have today at your home
They investigated themselves and found no wrongdoing. The Sheriff says he stands behind his deputy.
With very rare exception, they ALWAYS GET AWAY WITH IT.
@@timb7775 In most instances yes but not sure how here.
@@timb7775 he should stand behind him on the way out of a job and behind him on the way to jail.
Police officers should face a decade in prison for intering a residence without a warrent. The problem is that judges seem to never have read the fourth ammendment.
Judges can only jail people for contempt. The prosecutor has to take the case up and prosecute.
Should but they won’t. But there are second amendment solutions.
I disagree with that. I think the problem is the idea that when a police officer breaks the law it's not considered illegal because they use the work "unlawful", as if it means something different. kind of like how they use the word "detain" instead of what it really is, imprisonment, when referencing someone who was arrested with no charges to get around the 6th amendment
@@ryanbeyer9078 wut? Wth does that even mean?
Or fire them and they lose pension for any civil rights violation
GTFO Steve. I'm so tired of "they need more training". Bull. They intentionally train them on how to skirt the law of civil rights. They don't need MORE training, they need an over-haul and the PROPER training. Teaching a class on how to yell "STOP RESISTING! HE'S REACHING FOR MY GUN!" in case there are cameras rolling, is not the time they need to be spending on training.
They need consequences for breaking the law.
"They intentionally train them on how to skirt the law of civil rights."
In some places, yes. In many cases, it is simply taking the newly graduated officer/deputy from the academy and telling them to forget what they learned at the academy and "re-teaching" them how to operate under that departments, ie chief of police/sheriff's, wishes.
But you are 100% correct. They don't need MORE training, the corrupt chief of police/sheriff's need to be removed so the officers/deputies can act as they were originally trained at the academy.
@@mgass1354 well said. You're right. The culture from the top down dictates the ultimate "training"
@@byronshepherd8415
I go into that in my standalone reply but it has been that way, the top dictates the culture, forever. If the officers/deputies on the street are doing this stuff, that means the top is pushing it through the supervisors and FTO's to those officers/deputies.
By the time I left law enforcement (this was decades ago), every single chief of police and sheriff in almost every jurisdiction around my area had resigned while under FBI investigation for corruption.
I'm pretty sure Steve's training comment was tongue in cheek.
He’s an armed intruder. Castle doctrine.
Oh the blatant hypocrisy of screaming "Reserve judgement until all of the facts come out" and then screaming "That's old news" once all of the facts come out.
Modern law enforcement seems thoroughly pleased with the status quo. I have never, even once, been able to get an active duty cop to engage in any exchange about the rift between themselves and they citizenry. All I see is coverups and spineless conformity.
Yeah, there's a lot of that out there. But, Grady Judd is a shining example of what a good cop can be. Go check him out, he doesn't care who ya are, you break the law, you going down. He has arrested bad cops, bad lawyers, and bad judges as well. He doesn't care. He has singlehandedly put a serious dent into human trafficking and pdfiles activities. He is regularly taking Disney to task and arresting pdfiles on Disney campus. He Sherriff Grady Judd in Polk County Florida.
Part of the problem with cops turning on bad cops, is that the bad guy in question is armed and angry at you. This could lead to reconsideration.
Doesn't make it right, but it does make it understandable.
@@mikefarmer4748 go check out Grady Judd.
Agreed, and the cops are angry when any negative story is in the press. They seem to honestly believe they are the good guys and are above reproach and above oversight, no matter what they do.
The cops think the press is their enemy, even when the press is absolutely accurately reporting what happened.
The cops, at this point, seem to think all citizens are their enemy.
@@mikefarmer4748they have been known to take out whistleblowers within their own departments.
They usually define it as an accident while training or something else shady.
The deputy tried to call it exigent circumstances by saying the kid at the door fled from him.
The fact that he thinks this'll hold up proves that officers' subjective experience is given way too much leeway
and yet we aren't allowed to speculate what goes on in their minds when they manipulate, dominate and control innocent people.
Especially when the determining case law for this is when police in the 1980's busted into a literal bank robber's home to arrest him without first obtaining a warrant and the supreme court of california ruled that the police were in the wrong for not first obtaining a warrant to carry out the arrest. So if police can't bust down your door for suspected bank robbery without a warrant, for sure a teenager closing the door on you doesn't even come close.
He violated 11 out of 10 of the Bill of Rights. That's how illegal his actions were.
Funny thing is, there are actually 11 amendments to the Constitution from the Bill of Rights. (1-10 and 27)
@@fnjesusfreak No, Stop making shit up. first 10 are the Bill of Rights. 27 has to do with congressional salaries, lol. Just google this. It's stuff I learned in grade school in the 70's. Come one, man
@@jessedorsettii9988 There were 12 amendments written, of which 10 were initially ratified, and then one of the other two became #27.
The behavior of a paramilitary organizations subordinates is a reflection of its leadership. This doesn't make the sheriff or his staff look good.
Not only is this a 4th amendment violation after being advised of her rights he specifically says “I don’t care”. Why is he an officer if he doesn’t care about the laws he swore an oath to uphold?
Nowadays it seems NONE OF THEM CARE!!! You only have the "rights" they decide to give you - and they can switch that up at any moment.
it is because he doesn’t care about the laws he swore an oath to uphold that his was CHOSEN to be a cop. That is who they select for. People who follow orders and believe others should only follow their orders , no matter the legality, without thinking and without refusal.
@@Metqa Bingo! That is the Truth.
I always ask myself... if the person doing the act wasn't wearing a uniform and no badge, would the average person witnessing it, see it as wrong.
That's how we all watch it as, but cops and bootlickers apparently have no heart.
6:55 not to mention there's plenty of stories where people are assaulted or killed after somebody pretending to be in officer makes entry into their home... You would think somebody that's legitimately an officer would know and follow the rules, so when somebody's not following the rules that would be a major red flag.
Some cops have EGO bigger than the Constitution.
Most cops tbh.
Bigger than a house.
US Department of Justice needs to get involved over this Deputy violating her civil rights. Criminal charges need to be filed against him as well. He should never be allowed to be trusted with a badge again. Sheriff's Department needs to be investigated by outside authorities.
DoJ is too busy trying to lock up Trump and not lock up Hunter.
Really, the weaponized DOJ? More like the Institute for Justice.
Remember kids. Do NOT open the door for the police. Open your window, speak through the door or screen door, ring camera, etc.
or just don’t talk to them at all until they have a search warrant
Do not speak to them at all, but if you can’t resist, only say, “Go away!”
Get a front door camera and if you notice the cops are there just ignore them completely.
@@blahblahblah-uw4uf All things concerned, if you haven't called them, Especially In The Middle Of The Night, this is probably the best suggestion.
Do not talk to them period. Don't open the door or a window.
How many thousands of people were innocent yet judged guilty because a cop lied. Who are the real criminals
That cop should be in prison and have his pension stripped.
This is why each state needs a civilian review board with teeth that makes every rank of officer scared if they go before the board.
States that have Civilian Review Boards are a joke,just another paracite in government; most times , Review Boards scratch each other's back; that's how the paracite grift works.
Police are civilians
I've been saying that for years and years and years.
They pack the civilian board with ex-cops
@@glee21012 Yes, but there are ways to prevent that. 1 to 2 year terms, elected by the people, limited to 2 terms, etc. Just because nobody currently does it right, because it's an appeasement measure and not meant to be effective, doesn't mean it can't be done correctly.
Payday for homeowner, new expenses for taxpayers, and a promotion or new gig at neighboring department for the perpetrator.
The bottom line sucks for everybody except for the woman.
@markg7030 She was ripped out of her home in the night by an armed assailant in front of her kids. She and the kids will not have feel good about that even if they do get money. The police (arresting officer and leadership) are the only ones here who have little reason to care. Even if the cop is fired, there's a department out there who will take him in with open arms. And they aren't paying the bill.
Going to be a big payday for this lady at the expense of local tax payers
At this point, the homeowner should be thanking this officer for paying her entire mortgage for her!!! And the local taxpayers should be furious that they will now be forced to hand over thousands of their dollars because this officer didn't care about the law.
Qualified Immunity might be a roadblock to that. It should be a big payday but it would not be wise to pop the Champaign just yet.
The LEO says "I own your house" he should have said "After my actions you will own your house". Payday in the near future for the victim of LEO violating Civil Rights!
The most gross violation of the Constitution. Your home is your castle and that cop had no warrant, no extenuating circumstances, no permission, and no probable cause to enter or arrest her. The most blatant example of police state behavior captured on camera. I hope the cop gets fired and the woman sues him and has a nice pay day for this gross violation.
Yeah the arrest itself was prima facie illegal. That alone would be a valid defense to the charges in court--that she was arrested unlawfully.
This isn't new...the video evidence...is new-ish, COPS have been behaving this way forever. Hope, is in that their will be change. Reality, the LONG LONG LONG standing accepted behavior of COPS, is this is not going to change... talk to the poor, COPS have been throwing them around since ALWAYS...can't afford a lawyer or now the cameras...so when they do get caught its consider some rare event.
The worlds largest prison population is in the "land of the free". 25% of the worlds prisoners and 4% of the worlds population...WE WORSHIP WAR AND AUTHORITY HERE.
At that point the deputy is an armed intruder in her home.
Cops like this always act like raypests. Training won't help change them.
Cops and rapists don't care about your consent.
Sheriff: "People are only upset because they found out about our blatant abuse of authority"
Disgusting!
What happened to policing in the US?! Instead of deescalating a situation, the police now create AND escalate situations!
Always has been.jpg. Modern cops were formed when the runaway slave patrol merged with the union busters.
police are not an never have been constitutional. we are supposed to be our own police
And this is EXACTLY the attitude of every cop everywhere when dealing with the not obviously wealthy.
No it's not. There are millions of police encounters every year and very few end up like this. This officer needs to be fired but it's far from the norm.
Remeber, police get to use ignorance of the law to get out of their actions but the public does not.
Only if you have a really bad lawyer. All police are ignorant of the law until they need to write up a report for your crimes. The most the city will do is now hire an outside firm to come in and do training.
Which is completely screwy - as how can you police and enforce laws if you don't know what they are..
I can't believe I ever had respect for law enforcement. They don't have any for us.
We are not people to them. We should not treat them like people.
@AdolfHitlerson-j9d
0 seconds ago
this kind of situation happens only because americans have become lazy and complacent with its servants ! if this was dealt with the proper way, within one minute, we the taxpayers would not be paying for court costs AND THIS BAD COP would never ever ever ever be able to do this AGAIN
Reply
Back the blue until it happens to you.
I agree!
Don’t lump all law enforcement together! There are more good guys than bad guys in the field. MOST have great respect and treat people right, the best they can. Spend some time watching police body cam videos and you will earn a totally new respect for them and what they deal with daily. It’s the most thankless job there is.
"Conduct and investigation" = sweep it under the rug.
That deputy is so lucky he didn't do this where I grew up in WV. One similar event happened and within two minutes there were five neighbors with rifles leveled the two deputies overstepping their bounds.
How it should be. Communities need to reign them in when they are out of line, we know government will not.
@@saber12 It’s for this very reason that open carrying of firearms was outlawed in California. The Black Panthers back in the day would always peacefully appear with rifles any time a cop pulled over someone in their neighborhoods, just to make sure the cops didn’t overstep. This was too much for the powerbrokers so they changed the law. I believe Ronald Reagan was the one who signed the legislation.
@@CounterSniper67 dang, we need that back asap.
And that's the way it should be!!!
7:32 training will NOT fix this tyrant
Absolutely agreed
A few years ago in Midland, Texas a cop entered a home in the early morning hours and set off the house alarm. The home owner responded by shooting the intruder, killing him. The home owner was charged with manslaughter, however a jury found him not guilty.
And that was Texas where nearly everyone has a gun.😮
That reminds me of a video I seen years ago. This one guy is constantly being harassed by drug dealers. He keeps calling the police who do nothing. Drug dealers even shoot up his house. Guy buys an AR type rifle. Some time later, police storm the house in the early hours of the morning. Don’t remember why. Guy jumps out of bed and starts shooting away towards the front door. 3 police officers were hit but all survived. In court, his lawyer got him off explaining the he had a right to defend his home from dangerous drug dealers. Police never announced themselves before breaking into the house. The guy thought it was drug dealers trying to un alive him.
7:23 how about at the very least you lose your qualified immunity, and you have charges against you. Completely outrageous.
All this cop's past stops need to be investigated. How come prosecutors have not dropped charges? Equally bad.
The hierarchy, first and foremost, protects the hierarchy.
"Us vs Them"... Because the system is designed this way to keep us "subjects", under control...
From a legal perspective, since thr officer is not acting in any stretch of a legal capacity, this is effectively a home invasion. Would the homeowners not be legally allowed to handle this situation with force just as they would with non-officer during a home invasion?
Yes, but good luck
Good point!
Yes, a man with a gun invades your home you can defend it. But you better be sure you have all the video evidence to back you up. Not sure how it would go if the cop didn't have a gun in his hand but I've seen some people get off when they defended themselves after a no-knock warrant was served at the wrong house. It might have been the case in Louisville that the police killed a woman when the man was trying to defend.
This type of defense, should really only apply to a known violent corrupt officer. Anything less and you'll be in jail until you're found not guilty
Yes, by the letter of the law, but judges/other officers will act in the "color" of the law and would throw the book at you for "harming an officer". Even in "Stand your ground" states, homeowners who did get scared/shoot were convicted. It's 100% "Rules for thee, not for me"
So, why not charge the cop with felony PC459, armed home invasion in the furtherance of the felony of false imprisonment PC 236? Since he moved her from the point of the offense, might add kidnapping.
HA! The prosecutors are proceeding with the charges against the homeowner!
They have no shame.
might add kidnapping? No, definitely add kidnapping. Also, because he took the mom but left the kids, child endangerment. He had no proof the dad was there.
If the homeowner hasn’t filed suit, they’ve accepted the behavior. Shame on them.
Our law makers and SCOTUS have let us down in the fact that we live in an uncontrolled police state that we now live in . End qualified immunity ASAP .
Every arrest he ever made should be examined. Anything with no evidence other than his claims need to be overturned.
Don't forget we allow cops to lie to every civilian without consequence or peril.
Not in Seattle (anymore). Officers are not allowed to lie even during an investigation without express written authorization from a lieutenant or higher and even then it has to be absolutely necessary to protect an investigation
We the People are CITIZENS, civilians are living in war zones, thanks.
If he was told to leave and didn't, wouldn't he legally be an armed trespassing intruder and could be dealt with accordingly?
Her kids will all go to college at taxpayer expense. The deputy should face felony home invasion charges.
they will graduate before they settle
maybe the kids will work for institute for justice
And assault with illegal arrest, I assume the officer did not tell the owner, flat out lying. Showing either unaware of property law or just didn’t care. The sheriff has video from both parties and is backing the policeman.
In fact, I know of one policeman who acted unprofessional when verbally giving the homeowner a complaint. The officer was not neutral during his visit, which was at about 10pm.
The civil case will be dragged out for years and the victims will get 5 or 6k. Most of the money will go to lawyers.
Home invasion by color of authority.
I have been arrested for resisting arrest in my younger dumber days. That was the entire charge. The logic of that one and only charge is mind blowing.
The thing that is mind blowing is that the cop decided to hook you up by only charging you with resisting and you still act like he is the one in the wrong.
@D.Trout222 the thing that is mindblowing is you don't know the full story and feel the need to coment.
@@TheSod70 Lol i know enough. Your attitude says it all.
@D.Trout222 Funny, I don't remember meeting you. Troll on though, troll on sweetheart.
the kind of cop who watches russian police beating, stealing from, and terrorizing people and thinks to himself 'yeah that's who I am.'
One who works in the Soviet Socialist Republic of California.
You think an American cop needs to look that far for this? You just listed things the US police are famous for worldwide
@@paulcaikmanSome American cops get trained by Mossad.
@christosdeschaine9444 Wa moment. I'm confused. Is CA supposed to be the state with frightening ultra-liberalism, or the one with frightening ultra-rightist police?
He can look at American policing to see all that and more.