Yah Peter is really coming along with his video production, Ive been following him a few years now and the consideration he gives not only his work but us the viewers is second to none. This channel is more informative then Titans, even though Titan says hes about learning, Titan wants us to pay for that learning. Peter is one of a kind.
@@Juxtaposed1Nmotion I agree, Titan is like the Nascar of CNC machining, pure product placement and advertising. Sure they have cool shit but very few shops really invest that much into equipment. I've worked at a couple places that would spend the money but most shops I work at you're trying to get the job done with what you already have.
great job with the split screen and the graphics/model mimicking the actual machining side by side. You always go the extra mile Peter to clearly explain your machining operations when it would otherwise be unclear. That's only one of the ways your channel is on another level compared to the average machining channel. Thanks for being a great machinist and teacher!
I like the use of back turning bb's for the deep bores but from the opposite side. Its always tempting to bore from the natural side, but if you can fit a back turning bar in from the other side its gold!
Seeing the simulation around 8:00 lined up perfectly with the machine in real life was super satisfying. Is there a reason why when you were using the larger insert drills in the beginning you used the milling spindle instead of the turning spindle to turn the part keeping the drill clamped? I would think on a drill that large RPM wouldn't be an issue unless the machine just works better like that. Thanks again for the great video.
I get a better indication of the load on the drill in the milling spindle. The milling spindle has no problem with drills this size. It was only at around 38% load with the 2.06” drill.
Hi Peter, just adding to other people's comments - the CAD simulation overlay was really good!! It's one thing to use your mind's eye, but seeing it this way really makes a difference. Thank you :)
As always I'm impressed. I myself operate on a humble Mazak QT200 only 2 axis and 16 tools. My boss does all the setup and I run parts. I can't wait to get out of my shop to work on bigger and better machines to make bigger and better parts.
I'm not sure Bigger equals Better. More metal off could equal more drama and excitement I'll agree. You'll be happiest where your skill and talant best match the job / boss requirements. For sure I completely understand your sentiments 100%
Just got my real CNC lathe, trying to up my lathe game. Great stuff, thanks for sharing. Subscribed. Also I am glad that I'm not an idiot for not being able to get a 4-jaw setup dialed in in three bumps of a mallet.
The tool has three threads or the cut length is three leads of the thread. So for the first tool in the video it’s a 24 pitch thread. That would be .125” of thread per revolution. So the tool needs to take a pass every .125” to reach the thread depth.
Excellent video thanks Peter. A question. Is it possible to re-cut the threads if they mill under size with another thread mill? What I mean is if you have to change the thread mill because of damage for example, I would assume the the cutting edges need to be aligned some how to avoid damaging the threads already there. I hope that makes sense.
If the thread mill is exactly the same and you touched it off the same. In theory yes. What I have done before is to put the new tool in and increase the diameter in the offset. This is if you are using cutter comp. and sneak up on it till it gauges. If you are doing a large thread. You could spray some blue dikem in the hole and carefully watch as you adjust the offset out until you see it wipe off the bluing. Note what side of the thread it is and adjust the offset accordingly. The best way is to set the offset on a optical toolsetter to the actual thread cutting part of the thread mill. Say line up on the theoretical thread point then go up one half a lead of the thread and call that the end of the tool. That way if you break that tool you can recapture the same length. On the new tool in relation to the actual thread cutting portion of the tool.
Check out EZ-Burr abs Huele. You can deburr your internal and external holes easily. Great video. I like how you sped up the machine tool paths so the video isn't too long. Keep up the good work. Oh ya.. and you should probably fix the dance party light in the back of the cabinet lol.
I have used those burrs before. In fact I have some but I couldn’t find them. So the deburr guys will have to handle it. It just started to do that the day I filmed the video clips.
That sure is a good idea to overlay the tool simulation. Outstanding, we can see what the tool is doing. Must be an editing nightmare for you. Thank you.
There was a shoulder in the holes left by the two drills. The larger one (2.06" dia.)to the smaller one (1.50" dia.). This boring bar has to remove what is left of the 2.06" drills tip before the shoulder. What I found is, If I drove the roughing bar clear to the shoulder it would break the insert. Because this bar just fits into the hole so there is no where for the shavings to go. This solved the problem, to stop .250" short of the shoulder with the rough boring cycle. Than finish the boring with light facing cuts to the shoulders depth. Once the bore was roughed to a larger size there was more space for the shavings to remove the last .250" of the bore. With the facing cuts. I have found this quite often works in these situations. Hope this answers your question. Thanks!
@EdgePrecision I just recently had a job with this material and heat treated to H1025 as well, I however could not drill it. I tried both HSS drills and carbide. I was using a 1/4” drill. What would you recommend for speeds and feeds? Any help would be much appreciated.
You shouldn’t have any trouble drilling it with a carbide drill. A conservative speed would be 150 surface feet. For .25 drill that would be around 2300 RPM and let’s say a feed of around .003” per rev. Around 7.0” per minute. If you don’t have thru the tool high pressure coolant and the hole is deep. Your going to have to peck drill. Not perfect for a carbide drill but it does work. Just don’t do to deep of pecks. Say around .080”. Not only is the peck to clear shavings but it helps to cool the tool as well. You can drill it with a HSSco drill. But don’t go faster then 50 surface feet ( 760 rpm) and around .004 per rev. (3.0” per min). Also peck drilling.
LOVE THIS VIDEO!!! Don't get me wrong. I love your commentary & enjoy hearing you explain what you're doing & why.... But this video is SO WELL DONE! Super cool & a break from your norm! Nice. Maybe you could make another version of this video with commentary. Same video, same audio, except with you commentating over top (maybe with the machining sounds in the backround?). I think that would be cool too. Up to you. But cool vid none the less. Luv your content! 👍
I have actually already thought about doing that. There is a lot to explain about what’s in this video. The tooling the planing of the job are just a few.
Peter can you explain the benefits of thread milling from the top to bottom? I have always thread milled from the bottom to the top but if it is a benefit to do too to bottom I would sure like to know
These tools have a shorter cut length than the finished thread depth. So in that case I always start the peck depths from the top down. This way I’m cutting into a already cut thread (if that makes sense). It can be one from the top down or from the bottom up as you say you do. In essence I am milling from the bottom up in smaller pecks. Do you start at the bottom and mill to the top in one cut? If so, if the cut length of your tool is longer than one lead. You are making more passes than necessary.
i have a question about drilling on a multi tasking mashine like yours. How do you decide the drilling strategy i mean when du you use the spindel and when the milling spindel. im working on a 2 turret lathe x,z,c,y i always have to use my spindel cuz my driven tool axis is not strong enugh for like a 2" hole but on long and out of round and squarenes parts its some times scarry to drill with my preferd feeds and speeds. Im just intreseted how you plan a simple thing like drilling a part
On my machine the milling spindle has 50 Hp up to 10,000 rpm. So if possible I prefer to drill using it. Because I get a much better indication on the load indicator of the milling spindle how the drill is doing. The turning spindle is 60 Hp up to 1,600 in high range running thru a gearbox. So its load indication is not as sensitive (If that makes sense). Also the turning spindle take more time to ramp up to speed and slow down (Not really a major consideration, but it's there). So with the drill you saw in the first part (Material Prep). The 2.06" diameter one only draws about 35% load on the milling spindle. So far all the time running this machine I have never had either spindle to 100% load.
If the thread feels close on the go end I don't always test the no go end. In particular on a milled thread with a full profile thread mill. Now there can be a situation with turning a thread where the go gauge feels close but the no go can start if the threading insert is worn or chipped on the tip. So if you are turning a thread you need to keep track of your insert and the ID diameter (Or root diameter/depth and OD on OD Thread). Don't just keep offsetting the tool to get the go gauge to fit. If there seems to be something not right. It probably isn't right.
When you do the drilling and boring of the large through hole, how do you avoid that the coolant is getting in the lathe spindle and spraying out the left side of the machine?
I try not to hammer into the gauge. Just away from it. But the way I look at it. So what if it shortens the life. I need to see how much the part moves. I will replace a $100.00 indicator when necessary. That said I can’t tell you if it shortens the life. I have been doing this for years without a problem.
I do live tool lathe stuff everyday, no independent milling head (yet) but this is an awesome video for a guy in the trade. This is a real life video not a promo it made me drool a bit lol cool part. Question though, why the hand chuck instead of a hydraulic chuck? Also, was that like, multi-stage thread milling? What's the benefit of that if so? Always looking to learn, cool stuff!
That bar is a little large for the hole. If I drive it right up to the shoulder there is no room for the shavings. It breaks the insert. What I found is I stop .250” short than do the last .250” with shallow facing cuts. This kept the insert from breaking.
What you are actually seeing is mist from the coolant. And even sometimes when the cutting is hard there will be steam from the water in the coolant. But it actually isn't smoke.
@@EdgePrecision If it's going to be heat treated after welding, they could have specified H1150M material for better machinability. Maybe something you can recommend to a customer for future jobs in PH stainless steels.
Thanks Peter, really fascinating video, i like the added touch of the simulation. looks a fairly complex part, almost looks like an oil industry part. Seeing the small bore thread milling got me all excioted to have a go myself. Oh oh, i see a crash in my future. Rigid tapping ive mastered but machining a thread thats a different animal. I really need to pay more attention to your set up - im quite lazy in that respect, your technique is somthing i can learn from. Great content as usual, many thanks.
I presume you are referring to the Z offset. I jog it to a place (usually in the bore. Then use a parallel used in a milling vise. But anything straight will do. Put it across the face and jog the tool just until the sharp edge of the parallel just won’t catch the tip if the tool. I set the offset there and adjust the wear offset in a little. Then run the tool measure and adjust the wear to the final dimension. The X is done in the normal way.
Ive always enjoyed H1025. Its such a simple HT, we do it in house and makes way better cutting conditions than annealed. Even H900 is better than annealed
What anyone would use a left-thread angular-contact wobbulator like this for, I have no idea. It is shiny thought! Have you ever had an op where constant surface speed wasn't helpful? Just out of curiousity.
I have used constant rpm for rouging and finishing in a situation when the part is very small compared to the lathe and the machine seems to struggle with acceleration and deceleration due to inertia near max rpm. Would likely see this with something like 14hp (continuous) motor and 10 in chuck rated for at least 4000 rpm.
When you run parts like this I presume the cost of the materials and work done are more than endmills. If your doing a run is it new endmills each time or just watch like a hawk ready to swap out? I saw you were really conservative with the gun drills before which made me think I have the luxury of running aluminium but I still wear out tools on the matsuura running 24/7. 100 hours of cut time ain’t bad. Not quite the same wear rate🤣
Nice video. Nice touch adding the simulation view in the screen. I would be interested in hearing you explain each step. it would also be nice if you would show the machining portion in normal speed. That machine is amazing for me to watch.
When I bought this machine it had a center driving chuck on it. The 21" Kitagawa chuck that is with the machine had never been mounted in the spindle ( I do have this chuck. But the draw tubes thread is damaged.). So when I got the machine with the center driving chuck. I removed it with its draw bar. The first job I did required the full spindle bore (Without the draw tube). So I bought a 16.5" Bison Oil Field 4-Jaw chuck that mounts directly to the A11 spindle. I mounted this chuck and really for the work I do, the chucking speed of a hydraulic chuck isn't necessary. Also the 21" diameter of the hydraulic chuck creates interference problems with the spindle and the chuck and its jaws. I have found I prefer the 16.5" manual 4-jaw. Also it is not necessary to have a bunch of sets of top jaws with the manual 4-jaw chuck. I don't know if you are aware but a hydraulic chuck can open (or loose chucking pressure) with large top jaws on constant surface facing or small diameter turning cuts. The manual 4-jaw doesn't have this problem. It also allows me to precisely adjust the runout and chucking pressure. Not to mention being able to run parts off center easier. I do need to do this from time to time. These are just a few reasons I have come to prefer a manual 4-jaw chuck on a CNC machine.
Peter has some pretty fancy video editing skills 👍 Was that OP1 boring bar dampened? I like that back boring cycle on the 2nd OP, I'd like to get a bar like that, and I'd need a good gauge for checking it. Cool video 💯
Yes the bar in the material prep part and the back boring bar were Sandvik silent bars. If you are going to spend the money on damped bars, don't wast your time. Just buy the Sandvik ones. They are the best and really work. For a long time I resisted that and tried others. Now after using them, They are worth it. They work that good.
Nothing like the sound of an intergrex that’s being pushed hard when it’s been prg set and operated by someone who actually knows what they are doing I can always tell a good machinist by the noise coming from the machine
@@Noo_Namee_cnc I’m not sure I understand what you are saying? The machine moves the axis to move the drill parallel to the axis of the drill, so it will travel down the hole without breaking.
@@rickbcfl If your referring to how tight the chuck jaws are. There are two bars clamped to the chuck face. (You can see them in the video) So the part can’t move back in the chuck.
@@EdgePrecision TBH I didn't notice them until you just pointed it out to me. I was running 1M bars at the time on my old girl, hence my push back issue. Love watching your clips, you've got the Rolls Royce of machines. 👍
I really like the simulation insets. Great for when all the coolant obscures what is going on.
Yah Peter is really coming along with his video production, Ive been following him a few years now and the consideration he gives not only his work but us the viewers is second to none. This channel is more informative then Titans, even though Titan says hes about learning, Titan wants us to pay for that learning. Peter is one of a kind.
@@Juxtaposed1Nmotion I agree, Titan is like the Nascar of CNC machining, pure product placement and advertising. Sure they have cool shit but very few shops really invest that much into equipment. I've worked at a couple places that would spend the money but most shops I work at you're trying to get the job done with what you already have.
@@Juxtaposed1Nmotion Doesn't Titan have quite a bit of free content for learning? He offers a lot of Fusion 360 tutorial files.
Look forward to each and everyone of you videos. Thank you for sharing!
Nice process and workflow! That’s a good looking part and I enjoyed seeing how you planned your setup and tool paths. Great work
great job with the split screen and the graphics/model mimicking the actual machining side by side. You always go the extra mile Peter to clearly explain your machining operations when it would otherwise be unclear. That's only one of the ways your channel is on another level compared to the average machining channel. Thanks for being a great machinist and teacher!
Hey Peter! Great video, I like the cad sim with operations and the editing! Thanks for spending the time to share your skills
The simulation inset is great and really helps in giving an understanding of what is happening. Thank you.
I like the use of back turning bb's for the deep bores but from the opposite side. Its always tempting to bore from the natural side, but if you can fit a back turning bar in from the other side its gold!
17-4 is my favorite material to cut. The tools last a while and the finish comes out beautiful.
So fascinating to watch this process. Really liked the CAD window showing what was coming up.
Thanks for sharing
So fun to watch this machine in action, thanks for posting
What a beautiful part. Incredible craftsmanship. 16+RA all over.
Always so many fascinating things to see in your videos.
Seeing the simulation around 8:00 lined up perfectly with the machine in real life was super satisfying. Is there a reason why when you were using the larger insert drills in the beginning you used the milling spindle instead of the turning spindle to turn the part keeping the drill clamped? I would think on a drill that large RPM wouldn't be an issue unless the machine just works better like that.
Thanks again for the great video.
I get a better indication of the load on the drill in the milling spindle. The milling spindle has no problem with drills this size. It was only at around 38% load with the 2.06” drill.
@@EdgePrecision what a monster machine... and where I work my mill gets maxed out on a 7/8 in drill...
Hi Peter, Excellent video, as per usual.
Hi Peter, just adding to other people's comments - the CAD simulation overlay was really good!! It's one thing to use your mind's eye, but seeing it this way really makes a difference. Thank you :)
17-4 is my favorite steel to turn on a manual lathe
Great machining Peter. The inset as always, is a fine addition to have. :D
Great work, I know I should not say it but the parts are beautiful. Thank you for sharing your day with us.
I like the picture-in-picture of the CAM beside the real machining. Nice editing!
I always look forward to your videos. I really appreciate that you provide so much detail on your logic.
Thank you for making such extraordinary parts.
I very much enjoy your explanations. This was fun for a change.
Amazing job. We usually first lathe ,then 4axis mill as our machine shop do not have this perfect machine
As always I'm impressed. I myself operate on a humble Mazak QT200 only 2 axis and 16 tools. My boss does all the setup and I run parts. I can't wait to get out of my shop to work on bigger and better machines to make bigger and better parts.
I'm not sure Bigger equals Better. More metal off could equal more drama and excitement I'll agree. You'll be happiest where your skill and talant best match the job / boss requirements. For sure I completely understand your sentiments 100%
I spent 20 years programing mazak lathes. 300m and a 350my were the largest I programed. Great machines.
The machines sound cool. Love you 🥰
Pete, another awesome job. Both the video and the part! Thanks!!!
Just got my real CNC lathe, trying to up my lathe game. Great stuff, thanks for sharing. Subscribed. Also I am glad that I'm not an idiot for not being able to get a 4-jaw setup dialed in in three bumps of a mallet.
The simulation is a nice touch, clear what you intension is. You make some complex parts, very well I might add.
Great video. I enjoyed it twice.
It's very cool to see the illustration of what the tool is doing.
Always pretty nice work ! Good to hear you, good to hear milling :) Regards.
Love love love machining 17-4. Especially H1025
very good video peter..thanks for your time
Fascinating and mesmerizing.
Big U-Drill straight down the middle, love it!
Great video, as always! Thank you
That's some slick video editing !!
Interesting seeing a thread mill operation in what looked like multiple stepdowns. Perhaps one pitch per step?
The tool has three threads or the cut length is three leads of the thread. So for the first tool in the video it’s a 24 pitch thread. That would be .125” of thread per revolution. So the tool needs to take a pass every .125” to reach the thread depth.
Beautiful work!
Quality machine, machining and programming.
well done. both the machining and the video.
Excellent video thanks Peter. A question. Is it possible to re-cut the threads if they mill under size with another thread mill? What I mean is if you have to change the thread mill because of damage for example, I would assume the the cutting edges need to be aligned some how to avoid damaging the threads already there. I hope that makes sense.
If the thread mill is exactly the same and you touched it off the same. In theory yes. What I have done before is to put the new tool in and increase the diameter in the offset. This is if you are using cutter comp. and sneak up on it till it gauges. If you are doing a large thread. You could spray some blue dikem in the hole and carefully watch as you adjust the offset out until you see it wipe off the bluing. Note what side of the thread it is and adjust the offset accordingly. The best way is to set the offset on a optical toolsetter to the actual thread cutting part of the thread mill. Say line up on the theoretical thread point then go up one half a lead of the thread and call that the end of the tool. That way if you break that tool you can recapture the same length. On the new tool in relation to the actual thread cutting portion of the tool.
@@EdgePrecision Super interesting thanks Peter
Check out EZ-Burr abs Huele. You can deburr your internal and external holes easily. Great video. I like how you sped up the machine tool paths so the video isn't too long. Keep up the good work. Oh ya.. and you should probably fix the dance party light in the back of the cabinet lol.
I have used those burrs before. In fact I have some but I couldn’t find them. So the deburr guys will have to handle it. It just started to do that the day I filmed the video clips.
Awesome job.
Man that high pressure flood feature is nice .
i usually chipbreak in 17-4. no issues. love the video. nice job
Wow and amazing ! Thanks......cheers
That sure is a good idea to overlay the tool simulation. Outstanding, we can see what the tool is doing. Must be an editing nightmare for you. Thank you.
Awesome video. Thanks.
Good Job 👍👍👍👍
Beautiful part.
I may have missed the previous video but couldn't figure out what that move with the boring bar was doing at 3.12.
There was a shoulder in the holes left by the two drills. The larger one (2.06" dia.)to the smaller one (1.50" dia.). This boring bar has to remove what is left of the 2.06" drills tip before the shoulder. What I found is, If I drove the roughing bar clear to the shoulder it would break the insert. Because this bar just fits into the hole so there is no where for the shavings to go. This solved the problem, to stop .250" short of the shoulder with the rough boring cycle. Than finish the boring with light facing cuts to the shoulders depth. Once the bore was roughed to a larger size there was more space for the shavings to remove the last .250" of the bore. With the facing cuts. I have found this quite often works in these situations. Hope this answers your question. Thanks!
@@EdgePrecision Thanks Peter now watching it again I can see.It was illusional the way the head moves not used to multitasking machines.
당신의 영상들은 저에게 많은 도움이 됩니다.좋은영상을 제작해주셔서 감사합니다.
You do miracles !
@EdgePrecision I just recently had a job with this material and heat treated to H1025 as well, I however could not drill it. I tried both HSS drills and carbide. I was using a 1/4” drill.
What would you recommend for speeds and feeds? Any help would be much appreciated.
You shouldn’t have any trouble drilling it with a carbide drill. A conservative speed would be 150 surface feet. For .25 drill that would be around 2300 RPM and let’s say a feed of around .003” per rev. Around 7.0” per minute. If you don’t have thru the tool high pressure coolant and the hole is deep. Your going to have to peck drill. Not perfect for a carbide drill but it does work. Just don’t do to deep of pecks. Say around .080”. Not only is the peck to clear shavings but it helps to cool the tool as well. You can drill it with a HSSco drill. But don’t go faster then 50 surface feet ( 760 rpm) and around .004 per rev. (3.0” per min). Also peck drilling.
Thank you so much for the help, I will store this info for the next time 👍
LOVE THIS VIDEO!!!
Don't get me wrong. I love your commentary & enjoy hearing you explain what you're doing & why.... But this video is SO WELL DONE! Super cool & a break from your norm! Nice.
Maybe you could make another version of this video with commentary. Same video, same audio, except with you commentating over top (maybe with the machining sounds in the backround?). I think that would be cool too.
Up to you. But cool vid none the less.
Luv your content! 👍
I have actually already thought about doing that. There is a lot to explain about what’s in this video. The tooling the planing of the job are just a few.
Peter can you explain the benefits of thread milling from the top to bottom? I have always thread milled from the bottom to the top but if it is a benefit to do too to bottom I would sure like to know
These tools have a shorter cut length than the finished thread depth. So in that case I always start the peck depths from the top down. This way I’m cutting into a already cut thread (if that makes sense). It can be one from the top down or from the bottom up as you say you do. In essence I am milling from the bottom up in smaller pecks. Do you start at the bottom and mill to the top in one cut? If so, if the cut length of your tool is longer than one lead. You are making more passes than necessary.
Is there a reason to drill with the spindle rather than the chuck for the initial holes?
It could be done both ways. But when using the milling spindle I get a better indication of the load on the drill with the load indicators.
i have a question about drilling on a multi tasking mashine like yours. How do you decide the drilling strategy i mean when du you use the spindel and when the milling spindel. im working on a 2 turret lathe x,z,c,y i always have to use my spindel cuz my driven tool axis is not strong enugh for like a 2" hole but on long and out of round and squarenes parts its some times scarry to drill with my preferd feeds and speeds. Im just intreseted how you plan a simple thing like drilling a part
On my machine the milling spindle has 50 Hp up to 10,000 rpm. So if possible I prefer to drill using it. Because I get a much better indication on the load indicator of the milling spindle how the drill is doing. The turning spindle is 60 Hp up to 1,600 in high range running thru a gearbox. So its load indication is not as sensitive (If that makes sense). Also the turning spindle take more time to ramp up to speed and slow down (Not really a major consideration, but it's there). So with the drill you saw in the first part (Material Prep). The 2.06" diameter one only draws about 35% load on the milling spindle. So far all the time running this machine I have never had either spindle to 100% load.
Great action! Like the CPU generated image in top left corner❗
Needs a chip breaking cycle on that first U drill
cool, but what about the no-go end of the thread-gauge?
If the thread feels close on the go end I don't always test the no go end. In particular on a milled thread with a full profile thread mill. Now there can be a situation with turning a thread where the go gauge feels close but the no go can start if the threading insert is worn or chipped on the tip. So if you are turning a thread you need to keep track of your insert and the ID diameter (Or root diameter/depth and OD on OD Thread). Don't just keep offsetting the tool to get the go gauge to fit. If there seems to be something not right. It probably isn't right.
When you do the drilling and boring of the large through hole, how do you avoid that the coolant is getting in the lathe spindle and spraying out the left side of the machine?
I have a air inflated bladder that plugs off the spindle bore. My local tool supplier (Bass Tool) sells them.
@@EdgePrecision Haha, just a plug, but with extra features, that sounds nice. :-) Could you please show that in one of the upcoming videos?
You can make a plastic plug to fit inside the draw tube as well. The air bladder sounds interesting!
but when will you make a chess set? :D
I actually do want to make a set. But having the time? Chess is a interest of mine.
Does hammering the workpiece to run true, while the dial gauge is still in contact with it, shorten the gauge's life?
I try not to hammer into the gauge. Just away from it. But the way I look at it. So what if it shortens the life. I need to see how much the part moves. I will replace a $100.00 indicator when necessary. That said I can’t tell you if it shortens the life. I have been doing this for years without a problem.
Very nice job
I do live tool lathe stuff everyday, no independent milling head (yet) but this is an awesome video for a guy in the trade. This is a real life video not a promo it made me drool a bit lol cool part. Question though, why the hand chuck instead of a hydraulic chuck? Also, was that like, multi-stage thread milling? What's the benefit of that if so? Always looking to learn, cool stuff!
A true machine porn video. The Picture in Picture simulation was a nice added on touch.
I'm curious as to why u were internally facing the bore with the silent bar ,was that for chip control, I've never done that b4
That bar is a little large for the hole. If I drive it right up to the shoulder there is no room for the shavings. It breaks the insert. What I found is I stop .250” short than do the last .250” with shallow facing cuts. This kept the insert from breaking.
@@EdgePrecision ,I'll try that 2 ,I get the same problem cutting that material, in ur same situation
please make an video with programming also and really nice video
Did to crash your machine? Shouldn't be leaking coolant out where tools shoulder up to the spindle. And why the 4 jaw?
12:02 makes me want to look for 9 volt batteries for the smoke alarm.
What you are actually seeing is mist from the coolant. And even sometimes when the cutting is hard there will be steam from the water in the coolant. But it actually isn't smoke.
Its a beauty!
Is this a video about coolant?
I would love to know what the part is used for eventually, great video again thank you.
I couldn’t tell you. I do know it gets welded to another part. It’s called a mandrill. Did that help?
@@EdgePrecision If it's going to be heat treated after welding, they could have specified H1150M material for better machinability. Maybe something you can recommend to a customer for future jobs in PH stainless steels.
Torno magnífico
Thanks Peter, really fascinating video, i like the added touch of the simulation. looks a fairly complex part, almost looks like an oil industry part. Seeing the small bore thread milling got me all excioted to have a go myself. Oh oh, i see a crash in my future. Rigid tapping ive mastered but machining a thread thats a different animal. I really need to pay more attention to your set up - im quite lazy in that respect, your technique is somthing i can learn from. Great content as usual, many thanks.
How do you touch off that back-boring bar in Z?
I presume you are referring to the Z offset. I jog it to a place (usually in the bore. Then use a parallel used in a milling vise. But anything straight will do. Put it across the face and jog the tool just until the sharp edge of the parallel just won’t catch the tip if the tool. I set the offset there and adjust the wear offset in a little. Then run the tool measure and adjust the wear to the final dimension. The X is done in the normal way.
How do you deburr that breakthrough drilling on the bore?
For me it’s easy. The guys in deburr do it. They are very good at it. It needs to have a .030” radius as well.
@@EdgePrecision That's one way to get it done
how many tools can this machine load
It can hole 80 tools in the changer magazine.
Thank you, it must have taken a lot of work to record this video. Too bad it ends
Ive always enjoyed H1025. Its such a simple HT, we do it in house and makes way better cutting conditions than annealed. Even H900 is better than annealed
What program you use ?😮
For programming for this machine I use Esprit TNG. For Cad I use SpacClaim or sometimes Fusion.
What anyone would use a left-thread angular-contact wobbulator like this for, I have no idea. It is shiny thought! Have you ever had an op where constant surface speed wasn't helpful? Just out of curiousity.
I always use constant surface speed on turning tools. Except a threading tool.
@@EdgePrecision Thank you for the reply; I figured as much but my guess is of little value next to your experience.
I have used constant rpm for rouging and finishing in a situation when the part is very small compared to the lathe and the machine seems to struggle with acceleration and deceleration due to inertia near max rpm. Would likely see this with something like 14hp (continuous) motor and 10 in chuck rated for at least 4000 rpm.
very professional
I wanna upgrade my bidet after seeing this
我非常喜欢你的这个四爪卡盘 可惜在中国买不到
Amazing
When you run parts like this I presume the cost of the materials and work done are more than endmills. If your doing a run is it new endmills each time or just watch like a hawk ready to swap out?
I saw you were really conservative with the gun drills before which made me think
I have the luxury of running aluminium but I still wear out tools on the matsuura running 24/7. 100 hours of cut time ain’t bad. Not quite the same wear rate🤣
I don’t necessarily start with new endmills if the ones I’m using are in good shape. I watch them and the size they cut as I run the job.
@@EdgePrecision every days a school day. Stainless makes me paranoid 🤦♂️ I appreciate the reply keep the videos coming
How much does this part finaly cost?
I can’t really say, because I am not doing everything to the part.
Nice video. Nice touch adding the simulation view in the screen. I would be interested in hearing you explain each step. it would also be nice if you would show the machining portion in normal speed. That machine is amazing for me to watch.
Why don't you use a 3 jaw hydraulic chuck?
When I bought this machine it had a center driving chuck on it. The 21" Kitagawa chuck that is with the machine had never been mounted in the spindle ( I do have this chuck. But the draw tubes thread is damaged.). So when I got the machine with the center driving chuck. I removed it with its draw bar. The first job I did required the full spindle bore (Without the draw tube). So I bought a 16.5" Bison Oil Field 4-Jaw chuck that mounts directly to the A11 spindle. I mounted this chuck and really for the work I do, the chucking speed of a hydraulic chuck isn't necessary. Also the 21" diameter of the hydraulic chuck creates interference problems with the spindle and the chuck and its jaws. I have found I prefer the 16.5" manual 4-jaw. Also it is not necessary to have a bunch of sets of top jaws with the manual 4-jaw chuck. I don't know if you are aware but a hydraulic chuck can open (or loose chucking pressure) with large top jaws on constant surface facing or small diameter turning cuts. The manual 4-jaw doesn't have this problem. It also allows me to precisely adjust the runout and chucking pressure. Not to mention being able to run parts off center easier. I do need to do this from time to time. These are just a few reasons I have come to prefer a manual 4-jaw chuck on a CNC machine.
Hi! Is that machine a Mazak Integrex?
@@markusrohe6522 Yes it is a Mazak e650 H.
@@EdgePrecision thanks for your reply. In our company, we also have Mazak lathes. Best machines ever, I think.💪
Peter has some pretty fancy video editing skills 👍 Was that OP1 boring bar dampened? I like that back boring cycle on the 2nd OP, I'd like to get a bar like that, and I'd need a good gauge for checking it. Cool video 💯
Yes the bar in the material prep part and the back boring bar were Sandvik silent bars. If you are going to spend the money on damped bars, don't wast your time. Just buy the Sandvik ones. They are the best and really work. For a long time I resisted that and tried others. Now after using them, They are worth it. They work that good.
How come it took so long? I did mine in half the time on my manual lathe! 🤣🤣👍
What took time was the milling. Did you do that on a manual lathe?
@@EdgePrecision IT was a Joke!! You need a vacation😂 😎 Good video thanks for sharing
I'd rather do 17-4 over 304 any day! Way to rip it. Nice work.
Nothing like the sound of an intergrex that’s being pushed hard when it’s been prg set and operated by someone who actually knows what they are doing I can always tell a good machinist by the noise coming from the machine
супер👍👍👍
Hello Peter, long boring bar it's silent tools?
Yes the rough bar in the material prep and the back boring bar are Sandvik silent tools.
@@EdgePrecision when you drill at an angle, the trajectory of the tool is like a chamfer
@@Noo_Namee_cnc I’m not sure I understand what you are saying? The machine moves the axis to move the drill parallel to the axis of the drill, so it will travel down the hole without breaking.
@@EdgePrecision I mean start p. XZY end p. XZ
Have you ever used a torque wrench to see what force you're clamping at?
I'm at 180NM.
No I don’t really use torque wrenches. I just do it by feel.
@@EdgePrecision I did too until I got push back from 316 Stainless Steel.
High feed for chip breaking feature. 😉
@@rickbcfl If your referring to how tight the chuck jaws are. There are two bars clamped to the chuck face. (You can see them in the video) So the part can’t move back in the chuck.
@@EdgePrecision TBH I didn't notice them until you just pointed it out to me.
I was running 1M bars at the time on my old girl, hence my push back issue.
Love watching your clips, you've got the Rolls Royce of machines. 👍
@@rickbcfl Except for that one flickering light inside ;-)