DO YOU SUPPORT HAMAS?’ GOP Senator GRILLS Arab-American Hate Crimes EXPERT

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 79

  • @sdpitt49
    @sdpitt49 Месяц назад +37

    Get Nomiki off the show. She is biased, crazy, and an emotional liar. This is so bad for the show and for the left perspective

  • @sweetkritty
    @sweetkritty Месяц назад +17

    Needs to be asked if hate crimes can be committed against whites

    • @KarlosKoba
      @KarlosKoba Месяц назад +3

      It's called Antiwhitism by the way, friend. 🙏🏻🤍

    • @JohnTightlips
      @JohnTightlips Месяц назад +1

      Yes it can be a hate crime amplification. Also don’t look at the demographics of those who commit hate crimes and their representation in the population…

    • @calimoss
      @calimoss Месяц назад +1

      The subject of this particular hearing was antisemitic and Muslim hate crimes.
      But sure...... let's make it all about you 🙄

    • @kevinlang9792
      @kevinlang9792 Месяц назад

      Depends. If you're Jewish, yes, If not, no.

  • @laram8255
    @laram8255 Месяц назад +7

    She answered that well

  • @ericjablonske9390
    @ericjablonske9390 Месяц назад +1

    Watch robbys facial expressions! lol

  • @farmerjones5233
    @farmerjones5233 Месяц назад +7

    Have you examined AIPAC funding of these aggressive senators and congressmen?

  • @kbsmylove487
    @kbsmylove487 Месяц назад +5

    You should support anyone who’s resisting an illegal occupation.

  • @beartrapperkc
    @beartrapperkc Месяц назад +2

    Robbie's face.

  • @imnotanalien7839
    @imnotanalien7839 Месяц назад +7

    All the Director of this institution had to say was yes or no. The minute the director answer’s with how dare you ask me that question because I am an
    American Arab….I’m surprised she didn’t also say …AND I am a women of color!! Arab, woman, minority….she goes straight to the identity group DEI answers. All she needed to do was answer the question….do you support Hamas. She would say no or yes…that is the PROFESSIONAL way to handle questioning by Congress. The deflection says it all…. ‘I do not have to answer to Congress. I refuse to answer the question. ….because I have identity group privilege, and how DARE you ask ME such questions’. End of discussion. She should have walked out…to put a finer point on it. 🇺🇸. The new America. Privilege cards trump all.

    • @SniperZaku
      @SniperZaku Месяц назад +4

      She said she does not support Hamas several times in that clip. Watch it again .

    • @calimoss
      @calimoss Месяц назад +1

      ​@@SniperZakuExactly! As a matter of fact, immediately after she says the words "I do not support Hamas" Kennedy says ".... you can't bring yourself to say you don't support Hamas".
      Kennedy's bigotry was on full display.

    • @susanlevy1926
      @susanlevy1926 Месяц назад

      Did you not watch the clip? She answered his question. I guess saying your head should be in a bag is okay. The party of family values and law and order calling for violence. Dont worry he will get away with his remarks.

    • @xkaiokenx10
      @xkaiokenx10 Месяц назад

      Bruh you’re reading into this too hard just so you can apply that sweet “DeI is evil” mantra to any situation you come across where someone who isn’t white says something you don’t like. Plz don’t comment unless you have something actually intelligent and thoughtful to say, and not just your projection in the form of a rant

  • @OneLine122
    @OneLine122 Месяц назад +1

    It's a slippery slope. First they introduce hate crimes as something that is merely about punishment, but like she said, the underlying assumption is that it is a crime against a whole community, which in itself is a crime, so sooner or later it just becomes a way to censure everybody. They played those games in a lot of countries, so there is no need to guess here. Next they will introduce laws to make criticism of Islam a hate crime, so blaspheme laws but with a very low bar in the same vein as "believe all women". Now it's believe all Islam. It's pretty clear why she is pushing for this. Don't fall for it, because it's the end of democracy.

  • @platitudepete8
    @platitudepete8 Месяц назад +4

    1:28 nice to see Robbie being super objective

  • @MauricXe
    @MauricXe Месяц назад +2

    I liked the guest's answer at the very end. That isnt something ive heard before

    • @elisereynolds945
      @elisereynolds945 Месяц назад +1

      I don’t agree w her on that but she speaks well

  • @undefined7141
    @undefined7141 Месяц назад +2

    I watch this between clinical rotations, I watch this to be informed. Not to watch cohosts bicker.

  • @arthurwyatt6867
    @arthurwyatt6867 Месяц назад +1

    She said hate crime is up 99 percent since 2016

  • @jeffwilliams6389
    @jeffwilliams6389 Месяц назад

    Every violent crime has the potential to effect a broader community including family and friends. Her argument is ridiculous

  • @VeniVidiVid
    @VeniVidiVid Месяц назад +1

    Thinking of people only as a member of some group inevitably leads to errors. And negative assumptions of entire groups is the root of abhorrent practices like racism. It’s also why identity politics creates so much strife.

  • @JG-kv6pg
    @JG-kv6pg Месяц назад

    With every flag raised in support, Ukraine’s spirit soars higher.

    • @John-xk9ww
      @John-xk9ww Месяц назад

      @JG-kv6pg Yes. Also 100s of thousands of Ukrainians are getting killed, and living their kids fatherless. There is a high blood price to pay when fighting a war. Can you explain to me how Ukraine could win the war, or are you just offering up more Ukrainian blood and American dollars? What is the path forward?

    • @commission3r203
      @commission3r203 Месяц назад

      Please raise 1 & go there

  • @philipbenson8388
    @philipbenson8388 Месяц назад +10

    You can ask someone if they support terrorism without it being "hate". The fact she called it "hate" when asked if she supported a terrorist organization is ridiculous. Yes, the Senator misbehaved, but it doesn't mean he was being hateful. How ridiculous...no grown up believes this nonsense.

    • @helenahanley
      @helenahanley Месяц назад

      I thought he was shouting at her in a angry way. I remember thinking has he manners dignity or Is having a very angry day over something personal which has made him angry. I said is this another shouting angry hysterical angry man like brett kavanagh.

  • @Usmcpb
    @Usmcpb Месяц назад

    This won't get many likes to many conservatives in here. They just wine over the liberal personalities. Weather it's Bri or Jessica the conservative's bias is always consistent.

  • @philhudson3619
    @philhudson3619 Месяц назад

    Girl with big glasses pearl clutching

  • @TahoeJones
    @TahoeJones Месяц назад +5

    Islamic propaganda

  • @JSRINTX
    @JSRINTX Месяц назад +3

    Look into her support of unrwa. A group that had people who participated in october 7th in it.

    • @najwaalsadi
      @najwaalsadi Месяц назад +3

      UNRWA is a united nation organization helps Palestinian refugees, Israel made a claim about 5 people helped hamas, however has never been proven nor has Israel 6:28 came up with any evidence to prove that, please get educated.

    • @JSRINTX
      @JSRINTX Месяц назад

      @@najwaalsadi unrwa admitted some of the staff did participate in october 7th. Read their own report.

    • @JSRINTX
      @JSRINTX Месяц назад +1

      @najwaalsadi “For the remaining nine cases, the evidence - if authenticated and corroborated - could indicate that the UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the attacks of 7 October. "
      So either start educating yourself or stop being disingenuine.

    • @najwaalsadi
      @najwaalsadi Месяц назад

      INVESTIGATION COMPLETED: ALLEGATIONS ON UNRWA STAFF PARTICIPATION IN THE 7 OCTOBER ATTACKS
      05 August 2024
      From Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General
      GENEVA/ AMMAN
      “I acknowledge the completion of the investigation by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) into the serious allegations that 19 area UNRWA staff members in Gaza were involved in the abhorrent attacks of 7 October on southern Israel.
      “The allegations were brought to the Agency’s attention in January. In close consultation with the United Nations Secretary-General (SG), I immediately terminated the contracts of the staff in question, in the interest of the Agency, while the SG tasked OIOS to launch an investigation. Additional allegations were brought to our attention in March and April and the concerned staff were added to the OIOS investigation.
      “The OIOS investigation’s outcomes are the following:
      “In one case, no evidence was obtained by OIOS to support the allegations of the staff member’s involvement. That staff member has rejoined the Agency.
      “In nine other cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS was insufficient to support the staff members’ involvement and the OIOS investigation of them is now closed.
      “For the remaining nine cases, the evidence - if authenticated and corroborated - could indicate that the UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the attacks of 7 October.
      “I have decided that in the case of these remaining nine staff members, they cannot work for UNRWA. All contracts of these staff members will be terminated in the interest of the Agency.
      “The Agency’s priority is to continue lifesaving and critical services for Palestine Refugees in Gaza and across the region, especially in the face of the ongoing war, the instability and risk of regional escalation.
      “UNRWA is committed to continue upholding the fundamental principles and values of the United Nations, including the humanitarian principle of neutrality, and to ensure that all its staff abide by the Agency's policy on outside and political activities.
      “In April, an independent Agency-wide review by three reputable research centres under the leadership of former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna concluded that UNRWA ‘possesses a more developed approach to neutrality than other similar UN or NGO entities’. The Agency has started implementing the recommendations of the review” and is fully committed to them.
      “Finally, I reiterate UNRWA’s condemnation of the 7 October attack in the strongest possible terms. I call - once again - for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and their safe return to their families."
      ENDs-
      Show me now your evidence??

    • @najwaalsadi
      @najwaalsadi Месяц назад

      INVESTIGATION COMPLETED: ALLEGATIONS ON UNRWA STAFF PARTICIPATION IN THE 7 OCTOBER ATTACKS
      05 August 2024
      From Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General
      GENEVA/ AMMAN
      “I acknowledge the completion of the investigation by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) into the serious allegations that 19 area UNRWA staff members in Gaza were involved in the abhorrent attacks of 7 October on southern Israel.
      “The allegations were brought to the Agency’s attention in January. In close consultation with the United Nations Secretary-General (SG), I immediately terminated the contracts of the staff in question, in the interest of the Agency, while the SG tasked OIOS to launch an investigation. Additional allegations were brought to our attention in March and April and the concerned staff were added to the OIOS investigation.
      “The OIOS investigation’s outcomes are the following:
      “In one case, no evidence was obtained by OIOS to support the allegations of the staff member’s involvement. That staff member has rejoined the Agency.
      “In nine other cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS was insufficient to support the staff members’ involvement and the OIOS investigation of them is now closed.
      “For the remaining nine cases, the evidence - if authenticated and corroborated - could indicate that the UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the attacks of 7 October.
      “I have decided that in the case of these remaining nine staff members, they cannot work for UNRWA. All contracts of these staff members will be terminated in the interest of the Agency.
      “The Agency’s priority is to continue lifesaving and critical services for Palestine Refugees in Gaza and across the region, especially in the face of the ongoing war, the instability and risk of regional escalation.
      “UNRWA is committed to continue upholding the fundamental principles and values of the United Nations, including the humanitarian principle of neutrality, and to ensure that all its staff abide by the Agency's policy on outside and political activities.
      “In April, an independent Agency-wide review by three reputable research centres under the leadership of former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna concluded that UNRWA ‘possesses a more developed approach to neutrality than other similar UN or NGO entities’. The Agency has started implementing the recommendations of the review” and is fully committed to them.
      “Finally, I reiterate UNRWA’s condemnation of the 7 October attack in the strongest possible terms. I call - once again - for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages and their safe return to their families."
      ENDs-
      Show me now your evidence??

  • @uncleb7821
    @uncleb7821 Месяц назад +1

    🥱🥱🥱😴😴😴😴😴

    • @commission3r203
      @commission3r203 Месяц назад

      story of your conception and development

  • @stepheniesbar
    @stepheniesbar Месяц назад

    Liar.

    • @commission3r203
      @commission3r203 Месяц назад

      what the dudes said when questioned about you and the content of their hand bags

  • @behjani1
    @behjani1 Месяц назад

    ارزشی

  • @christopher7824
    @christopher7824 Месяц назад +3

    Why should poor and working-class Non-Muslim or non-Israeli Americans care about this conflict? Both sides despise us.

    • @commission3r203
      @commission3r203 Месяц назад

      clearly you're from a closed off colony where only 1 channel is allowed

  • @strooomon
    @strooomon Месяц назад +2

    Kennedy asked a yes, no question. She could have chosen one or the other. She did not. Typically, when one ducks a simple, yes, no, question, they r not speaking truth.

    • @dustinbaker8272
      @dustinbaker8272 Месяц назад

      Probably because of the frustration of the community being asked that question because they are all being stereotyped as terrorists by the Right.

    • @SniperZaku
      @SniperZaku Месяц назад +9

      She answered "no" very clearly within 3 seconds of him asking. Watch the clip again , but this time pay attention

    • @calimoss
      @calimoss Месяц назад +8

      ​@@SniperZakuThey are listening just as poorly as Kennedy was 🙄

    • @jeffreyblack6611
      @jeffreyblack6611 Месяц назад +5

      some questions deserve ridicule. not answers

    • @JohnTightlips
      @JohnTightlips Месяц назад +4

      @@strooomon she answered, no. She does not support Hamas, he could’ve pushed her on the UNRWA but, he only wanted the sound bite.

  • @Jeremyb019
    @Jeremyb019 Месяц назад

    I ❤ KENNEDY

  • @thedelapo1606
    @thedelapo1606 Месяц назад +1

    😅 1:35 robbie's face says it all

  • @vinasel96
    @vinasel96 Месяц назад +3

    I don't know I bother with The Hill. Another far left host to annoy us .... even Robbie thinks she's insane (1:35)

    • @Usmcpb
      @Usmcpb Месяц назад

      MAGA tears