Since I prefer AMD based hardware ; I try to buy from the partner brands that are AMD exclusive. Like Sapphire , Power Color , XFX. I have had to buy from the brands that make gpu's with chips from both AMD and Nvidia though.
Great video! Ur channel deserves a lot more attention!!!! Quick question: which is better, the "Gigabyte" GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 12G( 3 fans) or the "MSI" GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER VENTUS 2X OC 12GB? And thanks
@@iliassaili3588 thanks I appreciate that 🙂 Good question, to be honest they'll pretty much perform the same (as in, your game performance/FPS rate won't be much different at all). It almost comes down to which style you prefer and whether you have a big or small case (naturally a 3 fan model will take up more space than 2 fan GPU, so that can be difficult in a small micro ATX case for example 🙂)
Good question, my hunch is that the GPU is a little more 'overpowered' compared to the CPU, but I wouldn't worry too much about bottlenecks. Some games are very CPU heavy, some are GPU heavy. So some games will perform different to others with both CPUs. You've got a solid enough system though, so most games should run smoothly IMO 🙂
Listen, the best way to figure that out is to look up benchmarks of the games you're going to be playing and games you also might play. Determine whether or not you're playing at 1080p or 1440p also, because at 1080p low settings, you should get about 250 to 300 FPS in most games with that GPU, assuming that the CPU is powerful enough to also deliver 250 to 300 FPS and is not the limiting factor. It also depends on how much FPS is enough for you. For exaple; when I upgrade, I look at the current games and types of games I play and look up benchmarks of that GPU or CPU in those games to see what the performance is like. I want to be able to max out my monitors refresh rate of 144HZ at all times, meaning I always want my CPU and GPU to get at least 144 FPS in all games I play or might play. Of course you want to look at how much FPS you want as your standard depending on your taste and/or monitor refresh rate, and aim for at least that number of FPS when looking up benchmarks, but at least a little higher so your CPU doesn't become irrelevantand and underpowered in two years with the more demanding newer games you might wanna play, so give your "desired FPS" at least 20% headroom to slightly future proof it, but don't over do the future proofing. So when I look for a new CPU I just add about 20 to 30% to the number 144, meaning 144 FPS, which comes out to around 172 to 190 FPS. So I look for the cheapest CPU that will get me at least that many frames per second. In order to see how many FPS you'll get with those two parts, look up the benchmarks in the resolutions and settings you'll be playing at, as in high or low 1080p or 1440p. When you're watching benchmarks to see how powerful the GPU will be at a certain setting, make sure the GPU is around 96% to 100% in the benchmark graphs, that means it's GPU limited at the moment and you are seeing the maximum performance of the GPU itself at that setting and the framerate is not being limited by a CPU bottleneck at that moment. Now do the same thing with the CPU's you are deciding between. The way you can see how much framerate a game will allow it to produce is by looking up benchmarks for those CPU's on your style of games and make sure you watch to see that the GPU usage this time is below 96% to 100% because that will usually mean that you are seeing the maximum amount of frames that the CPU can hand since the graphics card is no longer holding back the overall framerate. The difference between a CPU and GPU bottleneck is huge because generally with a CPU bottleneck, there's not much of a way to get more FPS out of it after you buy it, meaning you're kinda stuck with it if it's not powerful enough for some games, whereas with a graphics card, you can turn settings down, there's framerate improvement tech,(80% plus improvement with upscaling) and you can go from 1440p to 1080p, or even 720p if you absolutely have to and gain about 40% for each jump on the GPU side. So being CPU limited isn't fun because you can't tell the game to load less assets(CPU's responsibility) but you can tell the game to load less graphics(GPU's responsibility) If you could tell me 1. How much FPS you wanna stay locked in at 2. What games you wanna know the avg performance of on each 3. What settings you'll be using in each game (1440p or 1080p low, etc... I can come back with some solid averages and highs and lows for you if you want a second opinion based on evidence and research on those two components. Most importantly I want you to do all of this yourself as well so you can learn, I'm trying to teach a man to fish instead of just fishing for you. Also remember, framerate may be alot better or worse in some parts of the map on benchmarks depending on if the area has alot of assets to load (CPU heavy) or alot of graphical textures to load (GPU heavy) If you've already bought something and I change your mind, it looks like you still have time to return something if need be. Overall the 7600x is great especially for a 7800xt GPU IN GENERAL, but you're use case could definitely warrant getting a 7700x instead, especially if you wanna play games at lower resolutions so you cam pump the framerate to the max since the lower resolutions will make it easier on the GPU, and harder on the CPU. I know this is alot but I wish someone told me and this is as simple as i could make it lol. Let me know if you have any questions
Ok so I just did some research on the current pricing of CPU'S and I truly only recommend you either get the 7600x or get the 7800x3d ($350). The reason I don't recommend you get a 7700x over a 7600x is because according to hardware unboxed 13 game average CPU bound benchmark, the 7700x was only about 4% faster on average than a 7600x for gaming specifically. That's 37% more money for only 4% more performance, which may be worth it, only if you can't stretch the extra 75$ for the 7800x3d, the fastest CPU in the world. You wouldn't have to upgrade for at least 4 or 5 years for that extra 75$ for the 7800x3d. That thing will be going strong for a while 😮
@@slayridah yeah,thank you i decided to buy ryzen 7 7800x3d becouse i mostly play cpu heavy games and i need atleast 165FPS in games thank you again for that tips for me 🙏🏻
Hey everyone 👋 Do you usually buy a GPU from a particular brand, or are you happy to mix it up?
I am new to pc building so I am not sure 😅
@@iliassaili3588 hah no worries, good luck with your PC build 🙂
@@TechOverwrite Thanks 😆
Since I prefer AMD based hardware ; I try to buy from the partner brands that are AMD exclusive. Like Sapphire , Power Color , XFX. I have had to buy from the brands that make gpu's with chips from both AMD and Nvidia though.
I feel that the only real difference in brands are the cooling solutions and the post sell support
I agree entirely, that pretty much sums it up IMO 🙂
Also your voice is heavy man 🙂
Hah thanks, I get that a lot. People don't initially expect my heavy voice 😆
Great video! Ur channel deserves a lot more attention!!!!
Quick question: which is better, the "Gigabyte" GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 12G( 3 fans) or the "MSI" GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER VENTUS 2X OC 12GB? And thanks
@@iliassaili3588 thanks I appreciate that 🙂
Good question, to be honest they'll pretty much perform the same (as in, your game performance/FPS rate won't be much different at all). It almost comes down to which style you prefer and whether you have a big or small case (naturally a 3 fan model will take up more space than 2 fan GPU, so that can be difficult in a small micro ATX case for example 🙂)
@TechOverwrite Oh is that so , thank you for your answer I appreciate it 😊
Thank you I'm trying to learn stuff to build my first pc and was confused but this helped a lot!
The first build is always fun (but scary!). Glad this helped and good luck with it 🙂
Thank you very much for this video sir
No worries, glad you liked it thanks 🙂
Nice video
Thanks, glad you liked it :)
i have a zotac gaming trinity oc white edition rtx 4080 super and i thinks its pretty solid card in terms of performance and cooling.
That's an awesome card, and yes Zotac seem like a solid make for sure. I've only heard good things about them 🙂
Thanks I was really confused before this
No problem, glad you liked it 😊
for rx 7800 xt amd 5 7600 is enough without bottleneck? or better buy amd 7 7700
Good question, my hunch is that the GPU is a little more 'overpowered' compared to the CPU, but I wouldn't worry too much about bottlenecks. Some games are very CPU heavy, some are GPU heavy. So some games will perform different to others with both CPUs. You've got a solid enough system though, so most games should run smoothly IMO 🙂
Listen, the best way to figure that out is to look up benchmarks of the games you're going to be playing and games you also might play. Determine whether or not you're playing at 1080p or 1440p also, because at 1080p low settings, you should get about 250 to 300 FPS in most games with that GPU, assuming that the CPU is powerful enough to also deliver 250 to 300 FPS and is not the limiting factor.
It also depends on how much FPS is enough for you. For exaple; when I upgrade, I look at the current games and types of games I play and look up benchmarks of that GPU or CPU in those games to see what the performance is like. I want to be able to max out my monitors refresh rate of 144HZ at all times, meaning I always want my CPU and GPU to get at least 144 FPS in all games I play or might play. Of course you want to look at how much FPS you want as your standard depending on your taste and/or monitor refresh rate, and aim for at least that number of FPS when looking up benchmarks, but at least a little higher so your CPU doesn't become irrelevantand and underpowered in two years with the more demanding newer games you might wanna play, so give your "desired FPS" at least 20% headroom to slightly future proof it, but don't over do the future proofing. So when I look for a new CPU I just add about 20 to 30% to the number 144, meaning 144 FPS, which comes out to around 172 to 190 FPS. So I look for the cheapest CPU that will get me at least that many frames per second.
In order to see how many FPS you'll get with those two parts, look up the benchmarks in the resolutions and settings you'll be playing at, as in high or low 1080p or 1440p. When you're watching benchmarks to see how powerful the GPU will be at a certain setting, make sure the GPU is around 96% to 100% in the benchmark graphs, that means it's GPU limited at the moment and you are seeing the maximum performance of the GPU itself at that setting and the framerate is not being limited by a CPU bottleneck at that moment. Now do the same thing with the CPU's you are deciding between. The way you can see how much framerate a game will allow it to produce is by looking up benchmarks for those CPU's on your style of games and make sure you watch to see that the GPU usage this time is below 96% to 100% because that will usually mean that you are seeing the maximum amount of frames that the CPU can hand since the graphics card is no longer holding back the overall framerate.
The difference between a CPU and GPU bottleneck is huge because generally with a CPU bottleneck, there's not much of a way to get more FPS out of it after you buy it, meaning you're kinda stuck with it if it's not powerful enough for some games, whereas with a graphics card, you can turn settings down, there's framerate improvement tech,(80% plus improvement with upscaling) and you can go from 1440p to 1080p, or even 720p if you absolutely have to and gain about 40% for each jump on the GPU side. So being CPU limited isn't fun because you can't tell the game to load less assets(CPU's responsibility) but you can tell the game to load less graphics(GPU's responsibility)
If you could tell me 1. How much FPS you wanna stay locked in at 2. What games you wanna know the avg performance of on each 3. What settings you'll be using in each game (1440p or 1080p low, etc... I can come back with some solid averages and highs and lows for you if you want a second opinion based on evidence and research on those two components. Most importantly I want you to do all of this yourself as well so you can learn, I'm trying to teach a man to fish instead of just fishing for you. Also remember, framerate may be alot better or worse in some parts of the map on benchmarks depending on if the area has alot of assets to load (CPU heavy) or alot of graphical textures to load (GPU heavy)
If you've already bought something and I change your mind, it looks like you still have time to return something if need be. Overall the 7600x is great especially for a 7800xt GPU IN GENERAL, but you're use case could definitely warrant getting a 7700x instead, especially if you wanna play games at lower resolutions so you cam pump the framerate to the max since the lower resolutions will make it easier on the GPU, and harder on the CPU. I know this is alot but I wish someone told me and this is as simple as i could make it lol. Let me know if you have any questions
Ok so I just did some research on the current pricing of CPU'S and I truly only recommend you either get the 7600x or get the 7800x3d ($350). The reason I don't recommend you get a 7700x over a 7600x is because according to hardware unboxed 13 game average CPU bound benchmark, the 7700x was only about 4% faster on average than a 7600x for gaming specifically. That's 37% more money for only 4% more performance, which may be worth it, only if you can't stretch the extra 75$ for the 7800x3d, the fastest CPU in the world. You wouldn't have to upgrade for at least 4 or 5 years for that extra 75$ for the 7800x3d. That thing will be going strong for a while 😮
@@slayridah yeah,thank you i decided to buy ryzen 7 7800x3d becouse i mostly play cpu heavy games and i need atleast 165FPS in games thank you again for that tips for me 🙏🏻
@@stempel4333 no problem!Awesome choice, and it's so cheap for being the fastest gaming CPU!
1st
You beat me 😂