Law of Diffusion of Innovation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 дек 2024

Комментарии • 20

  • @Bart_potpot
    @Bart_potpot 4 года назад +15

    Still relevant today even during the pandemic

    • @JalalZaitouni1
      @JalalZaitouni1 3 года назад +2

      It's even more relevant today I guess!

  • @paulavolio4255
    @paulavolio4255 4 года назад +5

    Love Simon

  • @shepshep6793
    @shepshep6793 2 года назад +3

    This seems like a vid that will pop off 10 years later

  • @nashfaulk
    @nashfaulk 2 месяца назад

    i watch this a couple times per quarter bc it's important to understand that this is a LAW, meaning it's like NATURE, meaning this IS how growth happens. Growth doesn't happen any other way. Growth happens THIS way.

  • @victorburnett6329
    @victorburnett6329 3 года назад +6

    The percentages correspond to the area of 1,2, and 3 standard deviations under the normal distribution curve. Not a coincidence, I am sure.

  • @jvkingempanad
    @jvkingempanad 2 года назад +2

    how many times is he gonna circle the board?

  • @lewiswashington2311
    @lewiswashington2311 5 лет назад +2

    thanks dude hey have ever watched tfua?

  • @nafissadat7345
    @nafissadat7345 Год назад

    Where is the full video?

  • @nashfaulk
    @nashfaulk 3 года назад +1

    Interesting to study Fortune 500s and how they innovate.

  • @hjt1701a
    @hjt1701a Год назад

    What is his name?

    • @eewonsuk
      @eewonsuk Год назад

      Simon Sinek. Has some great TED Talks on RUclips.

    • @kylesteele4345
      @kylesteele4345 10 месяцев назад

      Ralph

  • @bxshtian
    @bxshtian 2 года назад

    👍🏻

  • @DanTheCon
    @DanTheCon 2 года назад

    Yo Future

  • @tama5570
    @tama5570 Год назад

    He says early adopters buy the phones because they want to be first, not because they care about 'Why' the phone company made them. There are multiple reasons people want to be first. The early majority want to see the technology validated, and lower the risk of wasting money. This guy is mostly unconvincing spin - try and practically apply what he's saying, you'll see it's not on point.