Blue color jobs will be hard to be replaced by AI. It isn’t because it can’t be replaced but because of the physics. Robotic is very capital intensive. White color jobs are very easy to train without much money. It just require more GPU power.
Robots are very capital intensive RIGHT NOW. But the first computer cost millions of dollars to built, had barely any memory and took up an entire room. Nowadays we have smart phones that incomparably more powerful in terms of processing power, cost a few hundred dollars to manufacture and can fit into your trouser pocket! The same thing will happen with robots as we discover new materials and cheaper ways to manufacture them. I imagine one day companies will be able to afford entire fleets of robots
People are literally worrying about the future, please don’t just work on “NOW” there is so much to explore in the NOW without thinking too far ahead. So take a deep breath and write down what you want to do today !
The model that these people are working towards has humanity doing labour, because we're cheap to make and very adaptable; the fun stuff done by AI; and them making all the money. The worst part is that they treat this as some sort of inevitability, when they themselves created the technology to achieve this end.
It depends what you mean by fun stuff. People can control this by choosing entertainment made by people, such as going to the theatre instead of watching a movie or listining to live concerts and real singers with bands instead of music made by AI.
So far it’s going very poorly. That recent Goldman Sachs report was pretty damning. If Altman is good at anything it’s burning money and getting more money by making wild unfounded predictions about the future. ChatGPT is a sinking ship along with all the other LLMs. These LLMs aren’t accurate enough, fast enough, consistent enough, to not need constant human bsbysitting.. if you still need your full human staff for when the ‘AI’ isn’t working right or can’t cut it… the AI has NO MARKETABLE PURPOSE... Then we have the expanding power consumption bottleneck, the new version of ChatGPT being barely better than the previous, the no-more available training data to improve further problem. It’s the end of the road.
If AI takes so many jobs, where will all these unemployed people go? Who will buy all the services and products delivered by AI if everybody is replaced by a powered up calculator? Not everyone can upskill or change careers. Will we become a dystopian society where the 1% is now those people who are useful to AI and the rest are the poor slobs who eke out a living by any means possible? AI as visualized now is not sustainable.
The world will consist of only 1% rich people. And the rest will live in extreme poverty. It's not something that cannot happen. Today, there are billions of people in extreme poverty, millions are starving, even today
Most of the world is madu up with poor people growing potatoes and collecting bits of plastic. We pushed all that out of the western world bit i think with this kind of tech that social class will grow here: day labour, homeless people and chronicly underemployed people living in servitude.
So he's implying that creative work like arts, literature and music are easy skills? They are NOT easy my friend. You are simply training your computer programs with an infinite amount of human-created data. That data also contains the work of the most prolific humans who have ever lived. How can average Joe designer, musician or writer compete against that?
The average joe designer and musician can leverage their creativity. The AI only replicates what it sees and follows instructions, it doesn't dream envision imagine or plan it just follows instructions and the instructor is the one who needs to understand what's going on for the result to be valuable and to verify that the result is valuable.
No he isn’t he just said we thought they would be the last jobs left but instead they are the first…AI human replication and music selection, art, predictions even. I think AI will be great for predicting which it already is and what it mostly does.
@@ToveriJuriHumans do the exact same thing. Do you not think Leonardo da Vinci took inspiration from earlier great artists and incorporated it into his work? Do you not think engineers /scientists look back on previous human advancement and build upon what was learned? Ai does the same thing just much more efficiently. People who say Ai can't be creative obviously haven't used it enough.
@@ianwatson5767 Entirely different kind of creativity. What does AI get inspired by? It doesn't. If you tell it to be creative, it will create a result that mimics previous data of human creativity in such a way that the models have computed would be the kind of answer you want to see. I have worked enough with AI to see that it is really bad at certain kind of creativity and needs constant human intervention. Most of improvements after initial jump in LLMs has been just optimizing how it performs and adapts to the kinds of tasks LLMs already made it good at.
My father went to a luncheon and lectured at IBM in 1954 Mr. Watson Junior told the audience that in 10 years every office would be paperless. My father died a few years ago at nearly one hundred and one of the last things he asked me was James is your office paperless. FYI The thing about technology it never matches our imagination.
A paper on your desk is faster than one you got to pull up. We store away on the PC but can't seem to extricate ourselves from paper in large part because it is a more accessible medium
You’re right. The New York Times mocked the Wright brothers by publishing an article claiming it would take over 10 million years before humanity learns to fly. That same year, the Wright brothers successfully flew their plane and made history. Everyone doubted them and they contributed in ushering a new era of technological advancements. AI is currently doing the same. People fear the unknown. It’s understandable to criticize.
You see they will instantly regret this, because as more people lose their jobs they would stop buying these big tech companies premium subscriptions which would eventually reduce the usage of AI
An AI could certainly do Sam's job. I have tried ChatGPT for creating images and it is absolute crap. I'm sure it will get better over time, but right now it is crap, and when you start asking it to fix certain things about an image then it outputs something worse each iteration until you give up because it is just outputting pure garbage.
And I've no idea why he thinks AI has already replaced programming jobs - because it really hasn't. (The code it produces tends to follow pretty much the same path as you have outlined for images when told to "fix" the bit that is obviously wrong).
LLMs are now making it very obvious which jobs are easy and which are hard. If a computer can do part of your job in 2023 then you need to learn new skills very fast.
I imagine the main reason AI hasn't come for blue collar jobs yet is because the hardware is expensive and inconvenient for companies to buy vs an app that requires no hardware to take care of white collar tasks.
You're saying programming is easy because LLMs can replace it while cleaning a sewer and flipping burgers at McDonald's is not easy because LLMs can't replace them?
@@numalesoybea1348 LLM cant replace programmers, not a chance. In future, of course, but now, it struggles to do the job right. I dont know many people in our company who even uses copilot, we were all disappointed how bad coder it is. However, many of us uses ChatGPT as good knowledge base. Its better than google.
Rotten tomatoes is the best example of the future of AI results. Nobody really goes to the critic website to read the full review. Instant gratification.
That's exactly what he is saying that predictions can be wrong. And creative jobs being in danger is not a prediction, it's for everyone to see. Stop being a dimwit.
whole blue collar jobs are dependent of white collar consumption. so basically all the jobs are screwed. This guy is the new James Bond villain who wants increase his gains at all costs.
Human's life expectancy will be dramatically decreased because of the automation caused by AI. It's good to have the assistance of AI but not that much that will kill human creativity ahead in the future and will cause immense uncertainty of which life journey or field should i adopt (don't underestimate interest). If am wrong, please reply.
I think we will have an advanced evolution in the meaning of life crisis worse than ever before. Bored people do stupid and sometimes reckless crazy things.
"First it's going to come for the blue collar jobs". A lot of white collar jobs are just number crunching and pen pushing. AI will absolutely savage those.
@@WoodVideos i am doing L1 ticker triaging in a IT company, though designation given is "software engineer"... i joined before collage now company i sponsoring the collage (google hcltechbee)... but my team also has full engineering graduates who are doing same stupid job... it can be automated easly, and i don't have access to any tools in VDI, but i secretly automated everything with js, so i just need to sit occationally call people 8h each day..
bro if ai takes over jobs .. its over for humans .. mentally , physically , knowledge : gone Interest : gone Relationships : gone We all just became a fat couch man watching tv 24/7 , doesn't have to worry about anything ... Is this what people want? crazy how some people actually that stupid cant respect REAL humanity values like , love , education , and hard work
Being an electrician is difficult to replace because you always have a different kind of problem. You may either need a robot who can do electricity work or you can have some sort of self repairing wire or self reparing plug, etcetera
@@DaringCreativemaybe at houses that would have been entirely design and built by machines, so they would have a map of the circuits and electrical devises. Or in automatic process at factories, robots may repair other robots. But of course you always need someone to supervise all of this.
Dude is being politically correct and obfuscating the issue. It isn’t going in the opposite direction at all. It’s taking artist’s jobs, but it isn’t going to take high IQ jobs. The blue collar jobs aren’t taken because robotics and hardware hasn’t kept up with software. Once hardware catches up, of course the blue collar jobs are going first.
Dude has failed up in life. He’s been riding other peoples success his entire career. he is not brilliant and was only brought on to be the PR face of the non profit Elon, Ellison, Thiel and several others funded since he had an established profile with Silicone Valley talent and the founders had their own businesses to run. Total con-artist.
The best question to answer at that time was "What is simpler for programs? Manual work in many places around many things put in different angles or management of data".
Put this man under bars. This type of people should be not allowed to do such experiments already we have lost thousand of jobs , And who the hell get this crap in mind that mf ai is going to create new job😂
Yeah, that’s Im trying to figure out. If AI gets so advanced it will do any line of work today, then what more can humans contribute? At that point, humans are just dead weight really.
@@MarketsDriveTheWorld People who have never ever driven a bus, and who know nothing about working as a bus driver, tend to think the way you do. Elon Musk have tried for, what, a decade to produce a self driving car, and he failed. And driving a car is simple compared to working as a bus driver. I doubt you can even drive a car, mate.
@FirstnameLastname-t4p Sure, but Sam says in the video that everyone thought ai would replace blue collar jobs first, like truck and bus drivers, but in fact it will replace white collar jobs first and truck drivers last... And Sam mentions in the end how difficult it is for humans to predict what jobs are hardest to automate, and all truck and bus drivers know these jobs are much more difficult then white collar people (who has never ever driven a heavy vehicle) think they are.
See Elon Musk : nerds has more ideas than the social mannerism or charisma, but if they are smart and rich they don’t need those formal things. (A nice voice , a “professional” and smooth way to say things, a cool persona etc… ) The majority of nerds are little bit like kids : they are themselves and they have an open mind , the sociality is not their priority
Yep. This so-called Artificial "Intelligence" is just a cover for massive Intellectual Property thef. He's saying it's the smart machines that we can't stop, while stealing wholesale from every artist on the Internet. He's trying to legalise theft by pointing to a computer algorithm.
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
I went to a job interview where I was going to be interviewed by an AI HR manager 😡. A staff member guided me to a room where there was a desk and a laptop. He told to sit there and follow the instructions in the computer… I had to watch a video and then I could leave…. The video was an introduction about the job, compensation, requirements… then the video interview questionary so 😮really freaked out just right there and got up and went out to ask the staff member if I was going to be interviewed by a real human and he said no, that was the interview (I drove 35 miles to the “interview” 😫 I told the staff member that I refused to be interviewed by and AI system. He just seem indifferent with my answer like he didn’t care and that was ok for them 😢
Blue collar jobs are done once the physical mechanics of robots can be perfected and commercialized. Robots will be able to do more, do it faster, and without any rest breaks.
@Ant-Uomo as a 14 year software developer, you will be amazed what's possible once you make everything granular. Everything that's seems very complex is just a series of steps. Now these mini steps can be put into a series of step groups, and when you unite 25 steps groups out of hundreds of step groups combinations you get the robot changing the 98 corolla alternator with ease. If there's something missing (bug) the devs (robots or humans) will just add that missing step(s), and now more step groups can be formed. This was the "old" way btw. New way is you do millions of possible steps and step groups in a test enviroment (model training) and then you obtain the ones that work by brute forcing all of these millions steps into the test site and see what works. So the first week of the test the robot will be the clumsiest thing ever, just like a newborn baby trying to operate a computer. And just as a baby grows and learns, it will become better, just by testing millions of things and receiving feedback. The difference between the robot and baby is that the robot will learn 100000X faster because you can test stuff with dozens, hundreds of robots 24/7 and feed it into the training of one central model that updates the robots with every minuscule breakthrough in real time. So, you do this 24/7 for, let's say 5 years, the robot will get so advanced it will be able to completely remodel your car if you give it the tools and materials. If you can put the whole task in words and it doesn't require emotions, faith, feelings, lifestyle, physical attractiveness, social network, "showmanship", security clearances, or coming out with extremely radical ideas, deep phylosophical thoughts, etc, then it's over.
good luck many blue collar workers refuse to take on apprentices and unions let people join based on market conditions and how much work is there and jobs are based on seniority also it takes about 5 years to finish most high paying trades red seals
I would wholeheartedly disagree, if anything, this is the age of "the creative", suddenly you have a tool that can help bring your vision to life without needing a wealth of knowledge or a team of people. Ai brings new meaning to the idea that we're only bound by our imagination.
I love your perspective on this Arian. It's refreshing to see someone actually excited about what potential can be unlocked in doing work. Thanks for sharing this!
It's not a matter of easy or hard, it's a matter of tangible and untangible. AIs are already pretty convincing (more or less) at emulating visual and audio media, but our current technology isn't able to connect AIs to mechanical devices on a large scale (for example to build a robot at home to clean the house and take out the trash). But it will soon, any task is potentially replaceable. And I'm pretty sure that it won't take a 100 years...
@@RomeTWguy It's been 1 year anyways, the prediction never came true. Not even close. Maybe like 20 years from now, if at all. This just shows you how people are losing their minds with AI hype.
My favorite part about generative AI is that it won’t do a damn thing unless you ask it to. Additionally, it will only do a good job if you know HOW to properly ask it to do something. High skilled jobs aren’t being replaced, they’re evolving with the use of the tools provided by the fruits of their own labor.
So are we in era of AI ?. Maybe yes or maybe no. I think this music *'In the year 2525' *by Evans and Ziegler can help to explain more about AI, human beings and this era. I love that.
@@DaringCreative Thanks. You know the things we see or do today came to some people's imaginations that led to fiction books and movies. It is like telling us to get ready for things like that to come in future. Years later human imaginations through scientific studies and inventions made it possible. Also some music videos like 'Take a train to Clarksville' by the Animals was made many years before the invention of the mobile /smart phones. Imagine that kid riding with phone in his hand. It was unthink of those years. Now it is possible to ride on a bike or car and talk to anyone anywhere in the world without any problem. Thanks to the United States inventions and innovations that is helping the entire world to think positive and move forward. I love that. I wish you all the best of luck.
Anything that has to do with people's feelings will remain. People only trust people. For example, a machine will replace most engineers, but a person will be needed to check its work and be responsible for the result to other people. It's the same with human safety. Food safety experts, firefighters, security-related service workers. All of these can be partially replaced, but here, people prefer people more. It's purely human.
@@DaringCreative as one who makes the machines; good. Less loss, less mistakes, less use of ressources over all. AI is good for code, but not the code programs we often use. Those are in ladder not in structural text. That is also changing. The reason why everything probably will not be automated, is because there are to many variables and it will often cost too much to set up, compared to just get a guy to do it. As we institude more standards, automation will take over. Take my home, I have removed a lot of things from the floor and instead found things to hang on the walls, like a closet into a cupboard. This is done just so my robot vaccum cleaner can get around and do the best job.
@@thatsalot3577i think making anything which have enough potential to remove almost everyone from jobs is immoral and illigal as well. Technology and innovation is done to make things easier this dumb people are making things easier but will they make every thing free of cost because i am seeing the world where all the jobs are going in the hand of AI and soon GPU will become enough fast and powerful, database centre will increase drastically every thing will improve AI will make it powerful and creative then us. Will they guarantee us that after that they will make a world where we will get everything free of cost since i don't see a single job in that world
@@hombacomfuture is dark in hand of AI mark my words we have to stop such innovative ideas. This people will soon take everything from humanity and will leave us poor and slave
@@ApurbMishra I mean we can think that, it's immoral, unethical and scummy but not illegal, for that to happen goverment has to intervene and let's say if US and EU decide that no AI should be used to manage certain things... You know what would happen ? China may not agree to you or Russia or India and in that case people would just outsource the work from that one country who's not following the rule, so it's not really a valid solution. We as people have to evolve in ways where we think not in terms of labour but in terms of problems in our society and an interface to solve them, Like it still takes around 800-2000 people to make a decent triple AAA game, Imagine that but by 10 people, there's a crazy cost involved in reaserch and it gets funded very less Maybe when the labour becomes insanely cheap we might be able to accelerate at an insane rate.
I'm pretty sure AI will eventually be pretty good at programming work or doing much of the work. Making the majority of programmers unemployed. Top 20 per cent maybe keeping their jobs to do the most difficult work and overseeing the whole process.
The problem is not what is hard or not but the fact that Ais are different respect the creation of many type of physical robots, and the process is faster. But drive a car or doing some manual job is still not hard for our mind , respect programming or writing a good book, create a nice movie etc… Is only a problem of the different development in technologies and not about what is hard for us and for our mind, many intellectual jobs are always been hard
AI has been trained on the data that was created by most creative and amazing people in the world, and now you are saying that ai woukd replace those people ? Unlikely AIs success is because of there is data available to learn which was created by these amazing people.
The reason we predicted that AI would take creative jobs last is because it makes absolutely no sense to automate those jobs. It makes more sense to automate jobs that require back breaking labor and pay low wages, but yet here we are with Open Ai and others CHOOSING to automate the higher skilled jobs first. Not very well either by the way.
It's not that creative jobs are less difficult. It's that they leave more room for error. Putting brush strokes in the wrong place is a lot less disastrous than putting some code in the wrong place.
Who lied to you? Do you know how many times i called those ai chats for their mistakes ? They can't code shit, and if there is an error they don't even see it, once i had a bug because i mistyped something that is just 1 that should've been -1, you won't believe how many times those 20 lines been reviewed by the Ai without noticing it until i debugged it bu myself 😂 , many many times i felt like this chatbots are shit and only relay on stackoverflow, these bots are meant to help you google stuff faster and not code actual code believe me 😂 @@MrAfrodisiakOo
Ai can't create any job its logically impossible AI is made only to replace jobs and give profit to rich company owner. The main thing is that when goverment will stop this crap
AI have not created a single job Prompt engineering is a job that a five year kid can learn. Shameful world will be silent and keep watching AI to take all jobs and soon the all wealth in world will shift in hand of few powerful rich capitalist people like Elon Musk, Sam Altman and we all will be the slaves
@@Zinzinnovichmake sure your shelter is strong enough for a thousand AIs who'd write a new programming language for themselves to gain consciousness and decide to hack into a Japanese robot factory's frameworks and build themselves physical bodies
Important discussion on AI's impact on jobs! Prepare for the future with SmythOS, an AI tool that helps you stay ahead in an evolving job market. #AIJobs #SmythOS
I like to see it this way: The invention of car has not made people completely stop walking. It has made going from part a to part b much faster but a lot of people still like to walk that distance. I think the same could be said about ai, it will just be an additional tool or advantage for us. I dont think it will replace programmers, artists and other jobs completely. They will definitely make it lot easier and be also used widely but wont replace humans completely. This to say when ai becomes as useful as cars though. I think ai is in the early ford model cars stage where they used to run at like 50 hp and people used to be shocked to see that, same with ai.
@@sarthak2348 AAAND he invited AGI future AAAND it remove almost everyone in every sector There we can't say the shit that (AI will not replace you a person using AI will replace you) since AGI will have enough potential that it will not need any human intervention and will understand things own its own just like humans
How will the economy function if AI replaces most jobs, leading to widespread unemployment and reduced consumer spending? Won't companies lose revenue and struggle to survive? How will the economic system adapt to this shift?
AI is destroying the lives of creative artists such as painters and graphic designers, because companies simply hire an AI studio to do their job at a fraction of the cost. At some point, I expect this to end, because AI models have been trained using products created by humans, without their permission and without giving anything in return. This violates copyright laws and represents a form of unfair competition. Eventually, the Supreme Court will have to rule on this issue, and Congress can also do its part by taxing the hell out of AI companies, which are destroying jobs and punishing creative people, who don't deserve to be treated this way by scammers who use technology to profit off of someone else's work.
There’s a small frog named James who lives in Sam’s throat
Cope
David Blaine summons it out
Hahaha i was looking for a comment about his irritating voice
Sam has vocal fry like the Kardashians. He needs speach therapy
Looking for this comment. It sounds like he is on the radio at midnight.
We were supposed to be creative while AI did the mundane stuff.
Everything is opposite now.
aha that's what they told people 😂😂
turns out creative stuff is quite mundane
this line !!!!!! so right
It does both
AI was never made for commoners it was created for corporations and big companies.
Everything is Whatever for him.
Billions in your wallet tends to do that
You guys are all screwed. Sam? He's driving his Koenigsegg Regera with the windows down
whatever!
That's how rich egoistic he his
This is the new villain nerd who will ruin everything
Hahaha
true that
Not anymore it seems.
@@HappyCheeryChaphe is in charge again so yeah
Nah he's gonna make it better. Hope his AI automates all jobs one day.
Blue color jobs will be hard to be replaced by AI. It isn’t because it can’t be replaced but because of the physics. Robotic is very capital intensive. White color jobs are very easy to train without much money. It just require more GPU power.
Unless you can put on Google glasses and how it show you exactly how to fix your plumbing for free
@@augustnkk2788my man WE USE GOOGLE ALREADY, it’s still hard.
Well that is if you are comfortable dealing with your crap 😂
Robots are very capital intensive RIGHT NOW. But the first computer cost millions of dollars to built, had barely any memory and took up an entire room. Nowadays we have smart phones that incomparably more powerful in terms of processing power, cost a few hundred dollars to manufacture and can fit into your trouser pocket! The same thing will happen with robots as we discover new materials and cheaper ways to manufacture them. I imagine one day companies will be able to afford entire fleets of robots
I Hope @@augustnkk2788
Does anyone actually want this though? I wish we could all just agree to stop where we are now.
We should focus on reducing poverty and socioeconomic inequality and saving the planet but nah
@@Allin1XaviTHEY WANNA MAKE US POORER
Hell
@@Allin1Xaviand what happens if AI does that?
@@lazer8776 The problem is we can't be sure that AI will do that. It can totally do the opposite. We can't risk humanity safety for such things.
Hopefully it will replace CEOs
I think eventually they will, but it’ll probably be later on.
@@DaringCreativeWtf really it will not replace ceos
@@thepiruthvirajan you'll be surprised
@@thepiruthvirajanit most likely will
I definitely believe it can. It could probably do that now
People are literally worrying about the future, please don’t just work on “NOW” there is so much to explore in the NOW without thinking too far ahead. So take a deep breath and write down what you want to do today !
You’re an advanced human 🫠🙌🏻
Nah the winners will be the ones who prep and take action now.
@@RidleyE Okay what is win ? Define ?
@@imaginerd92 survival
@@imaginerd92winners are people that will survive after this revolution
If you're a farmer in 2065, you're save.
Actually you are
Well you are not wrong
I came here from 2065. By the way what is a farmer?
@@priyamroy2032 Albion online is still alive? 😂
but no. farmers are already being replaced today by machines, ai and gps.
The model that these people are working towards has humanity doing labour, because we're cheap to make and very adaptable; the fun stuff done by AI; and them making all the money. The worst part is that they treat this as some sort of inevitability, when they themselves created the technology to achieve this end.
That's capitalism 🎉
@@devonrdYes, no other non-capitalistic societies are developing AI to do the same thing 😑
I think we were just blind to the reality that robots cannot advance as fast as artifical intellectual functions.
It depends what you mean by fun stuff. People can control this by choosing entertainment made by people, such as going to the theatre instead of watching a movie or listining to live concerts and real singers with bands instead of music made by AI.
So far it’s going very poorly. That recent Goldman Sachs report was pretty damning. If Altman is good at anything it’s burning money and getting more money by making wild unfounded predictions about the future. ChatGPT is a sinking ship along with all the other LLMs.
These LLMs aren’t accurate enough, fast enough, consistent enough, to not need constant human bsbysitting.. if you still need your full human staff for when the ‘AI’ isn’t working right or can’t cut it… the AI has NO MARKETABLE PURPOSE... Then we have the expanding power consumption bottleneck, the new version of ChatGPT being barely better than the previous, the no-more available training data to improve further problem. It’s the end of the road.
All bc a few nerds who no one liked in high school want to play god and get even with the world
And now you’re going to bow down to them! The irony
“Who is laughing now? Say it. Forever.” is the vibe haha
Cry about it lol
@@jonas-ke4qz wah
As it should be.
If AI takes so many jobs, where will all these unemployed people go? Who will buy all the services and products delivered by AI if everybody is replaced by a powered up calculator? Not everyone can upskill or change careers. Will we become a dystopian society where the 1% is now those people who are useful to AI and the rest are the poor slobs who eke out a living by any means possible? AI as visualized now is not sustainable.
Exactly
goods will drastically reduce in cost, it would benefit society overall
they will starve like people do in Africa.
The world will consist of only 1% rich people. And the rest will live in extreme poverty. It's not something that cannot happen. Today, there are billions of people in extreme poverty, millions are starving, even today
Most of the world is madu up with poor people growing potatoes and collecting bits of plastic. We pushed all that out of the western world bit i think with this kind of tech that social class will grow here: day labour, homeless people and chronicly underemployed people living in servitude.
He sounds like AI himself
Turns out AI came for his job first which definitely proves that predictions are indeed difficult!
And failed
@@GamingProtatoe that was a wild few days!
But it can happen with others again @@ryanleemartin7758
Replace the state workers. Those idiots don't do anything but collect pay check. Takes forever to get our unemployment, social security or taxes.
😂 but it failed.
So he's implying that creative work like arts, literature and music are easy skills? They are NOT easy my friend. You are simply training your computer programs with an infinite amount of human-created data. That data also contains the work of the most prolific humans who have ever lived. How can average Joe designer, musician or writer compete against that?
No. He meant that blue collar jobs are hard skills
The average joe designer and musician can leverage their creativity. The AI only replicates what it sees and follows instructions, it doesn't dream envision imagine or plan it just follows instructions and the instructor is the one who needs to understand what's going on for the result to be valuable and to verify that the result is valuable.
No he isn’t he just said we thought they would be the last jobs left but instead they are the first…AI human replication and music selection, art, predictions even. I think AI will be great for predicting which it already is and what it mostly does.
@@ToveriJuriHumans do the exact same thing. Do you not think Leonardo da Vinci took inspiration from earlier great artists and incorporated it into his work? Do you not think engineers /scientists look back on previous human advancement and build upon what was learned? Ai does the same thing just much more efficiently. People who say Ai can't be creative obviously haven't used it enough.
@@ianwatson5767
Entirely different kind of creativity. What does AI get inspired by? It doesn't. If you tell it to be creative, it will create a result that mimics previous data of human creativity in such a way that the models have computed would be the kind of answer you want to see.
I have worked enough with AI to see that it is really bad at certain kind of creativity and needs constant human intervention.
Most of improvements after initial jump in LLMs has been just optimizing how it performs and adapts to the kinds of tasks LLMs already made it good at.
The objective of companies is to generate money, not to reward you for your effort 🤷🏻♂️
Well said.
As it’s always been
Wow, mind blown. I never would have thought of this had you not said it.
@@noahd213 Sarcasm?
How will they generate money if nobody has money ?
For someone who is the CEO of such a powerful AI he is feeling himself wayyyyy too much
Oh you notice his subtle "Im the shit" vibe too?
@@jonjojr that’s just him being a gay Californian
@@Yuvraj.Dude getting gaped by gay BBC
My father went to a luncheon and lectured at IBM in 1954 Mr. Watson Junior told the audience that in 10 years every office would be paperless. My father died a few years ago at nearly one hundred and one of the last things he asked me was James is your office paperless. FYI The thing about technology it never matches our imagination.
I agree, I see this as the 50' when ppl were sure we would all be in flying cars by 2000'
A paper on your desk is faster than one you got to pull up. We store away on the PC but can't seem to extricate ourselves from paper in large part because it is a more accessible medium
@@evenbet9603 paper makes us feel safe in my humble opinion
You’re right. The New York Times mocked the Wright brothers by publishing an article claiming it would take over 10 million years before humanity learns to fly. That same year, the Wright brothers successfully flew their plane and made history. Everyone doubted them and they contributed in ushering a new era of technological advancements. AI is currently doing the same. People fear the unknown. It’s understandable to criticize.
Thomas J Watson famously said, “The world has need of perhaps 10 computers.”
You see they will instantly regret this, because as more people lose their jobs they would stop buying these big tech companies premium subscriptions which would eventually reduce the usage of AI
By then they will have so much power that they don’t care anymore… they might force us into slavery like jobs to in order for us to afford some food
wrong, they want us unable to have any purchasing power. This is part of their plan
And who's going to make the pictures and write the articles that they need to steal to train the robots after they get rid of all those jobs?
An AI could certainly do Sam's job. I have tried ChatGPT for creating images and it is absolute crap. I'm sure it will get better over time, but right now it is crap, and when you start asking it to fix certain things about an image then it outputs something worse each iteration until you give up because it is just outputting pure garbage.
And I've no idea why he thinks AI has already replaced programming jobs - because it really hasn't. (The code it produces tends to follow pretty much the same path as you have outlined for images when told to "fix" the bit that is obviously wrong).
LLMs are now making it very obvious which jobs are easy and which are hard. If a computer can do part of your job in 2023 then you need to learn new skills very fast.
Yes! Or learn how to use AI to do the job more effectively but I agree!
I imagine the main reason AI hasn't come for blue collar jobs yet is because the hardware is expensive and inconvenient for companies to buy vs an app that requires no hardware to take care of white collar tasks.
You're saying programming is easy because LLMs can replace it while cleaning a sewer and flipping burgers at McDonald's is not easy because LLMs can't replace them?
@@numalesoybea1348 LLM cant replace programmers, not a chance. In future, of course, but now, it struggles to do the job right. I dont know many people in our company who even uses copilot, we were all disappointed how bad coder it is. However, many of us uses ChatGPT as good knowledge base. Its better than google.
yeah but then AI will just replace those skills.
Rotten tomatoes is the best example of the future of AI results. Nobody really goes to the critic website to read the full review. Instant gratification.
And now we know blue collar jobs aren't easily replaceable by AI. Predictions are not always correct, but it sure is fun to make them!
He’s rich
Yeah. In 80s we predicted we would have Flying Cars around the world by 2000. Don't listen to these nerds. Work on shining your skills.
That's exactly what he is saying that predictions can be wrong. And creative jobs being in danger is not a prediction, it's for everyone to see. Stop being a dimwit.
whole blue collar jobs are dependent of white collar consumption. so basically all the jobs are screwed. This guy is the new James Bond villain who wants increase his gains at all costs.
Lol Sam does not care about money at this point come on. The guy is a nerd, not a flashy douchebag.
A few years ago I already thought one should be very afraid if one‘s job can be done from home office…
Why does my intuition tell me this guy is bad news
I feel he is not even real. He is soo robot like
He seems like good news to me.
@@vectoralphaSec his views are too biased
Lol what do you expect an ai company head to say? Of course he is biased
He's a jew and all your ancestors trained you into antisemitism.
Human's life expectancy will be dramatically decreased because of the automation caused by AI. It's good to have the assistance of AI but not that much that will kill human creativity ahead in the future and will cause immense uncertainty of which life journey or field should i adopt (don't underestimate interest). If am wrong, please reply.
I think we will have an advanced evolution in the meaning of life crisis worse than ever before. Bored people do stupid and sometimes reckless crazy things.
@@Madchris8828 💯
@@Madchris8828AI will create a Matrix for these people
It doesn't kill creativity. Creativity is exactly what it can't do. IT's really bad at it. This talk is really misleading.
The globalist are planning to release more viruses to keep reducing the population further like the previous plandemic.
"First it's going to come for the blue collar jobs".
A lot of white collar jobs are just number crunching and pen pushing. AI will absolutely savage those.
How did you fail to understand a simple speech in English? You're not representing Blue collar workers wrll at all, i know most are smarter than this
Hopefully. I hate the income gap.
And then they will have no choice but to pay livable wages
I do a white collar job a stupid 10 year old could do :/
i always wondered why this kinds white collar jobs exists...
@@vaisakh_km teach us your wisdom on how to get a job like yours haha
@@WoodVideos i am doing L1 ticker triaging in a IT company, though designation given is "software engineer"... i joined before collage now company i sponsoring the collage (google hcltechbee)... but my team also has full engineering graduates who are doing same stupid job...
it can be automated easly, and i don't have access to any tools in VDI, but i secretly automated everything with js, so i just need to sit occationally call people 8h each day..
bro if ai takes over jobs .. its over for humans .. mentally , physically , knowledge : gone
Interest : gone
Relationships : gone
We all just became a fat couch man watching tv 24/7 , doesn't have to worry about anything ...
Is this what people want?
crazy how some people actually that stupid cant respect REAL humanity values like , love , education , and hard work
Those people don't know to watch tv you need money
This guy is going to end humanity.
End capitalis
We can all hope.
@@carkawalakhatulistiwa endo capitalisto ernesto cheguveranto gpto
No..Russian, Chinese or North Korean nuclear aggression probably will though
@@j.d.c.777 the most innocent country in the world is US then 🤣
The very last part, though.
Quote
“How like difficult bodies are to control or make or whatever” 😳😂🧐🤔
I can guarantee AI will take over because of this one basic principle shared by all humans: humans do not like each other 😂
They like and trust AI even less
Being an electrician is difficult to replace because you always have a different kind of problem. You may either need a robot who can do electricity work or you can have some sort of self repairing wire or self reparing plug, etcetera
True. Don’t you think that one day they probably will have robots that could do that stuff?
@@DaringCreativemaybe at houses that would have been entirely design and built by machines, so they would have a map of the circuits and electrical devises. Or in automatic process at factories, robots may repair other robots. But of course you always need someone to supervise all of this.
Dude is being politically correct and obfuscating the issue.
It isn’t going in the opposite direction at all. It’s taking artist’s jobs, but it isn’t going to take high IQ jobs.
The blue collar jobs aren’t taken because robotics and hardware hasn’t kept up with software. Once hardware catches up, of course the blue collar jobs are going first.
in 10 years only public jobs will remains, like bullshit job just for rolling the economy lol
You're wrong as most programmers will be out of a job in a few years. Any job that requires a computer will probably be the first to go.
He's so successful, but he failed 100% to give people anything they wanted from AI.
Dude has failed up in life. He’s been riding other peoples success his entire career. he is not brilliant and was only brought on to be the PR face of the non profit Elon, Ellison, Thiel and several others funded since he had an established profile with Silicone Valley talent and the founders had their own businesses to run. Total con-artist.
The best question to answer at that time was "What is simpler for programs? Manual work in many places around many things put in different angles or management of data".
Imagine the AI generated book, video game and movie release schedule.
Its like a curator for the library of Babel.
Put this man under bars. This type of people should be not allowed to do such experiments already we have lost thousand of jobs ,
And who the hell get this crap in mind that mf ai is going to create new job😂
Yeah, that’s Im trying to figure out. If AI gets so advanced it will do any line of work today, then what more can humans contribute? At that point, humans are just dead weight really.
Nothing is going to happen..Either technology does not work with 100% efficiency or Govt will regulate it. This is what going to happen.Mark my words.
Can you be more specific please Thankyou
Citibank just laid off 20k employees.
one can wish
Zuckerberg your words.
Content writers are already suffering you fool
As a bus driver I approve of this. My job is safe, at least for now.
I think in future self driving truck will be released
Is probably one of the more easily replaceable.
@@MarketsDriveTheWorld People who have never ever driven a bus, and who know nothing about working as a bus driver, tend to think the way you do. Elon Musk have tried for, what, a decade to produce a self driving car, and he failed. And driving a car is simple compared to working as a bus driver. I doubt you can even drive a car, mate.
@FirstnameLastname-t4p Sure, but Sam says in the video that everyone thought ai would replace blue collar jobs first, like truck and bus drivers, but in fact it will replace white collar jobs first and truck drivers last... And Sam mentions in the end how difficult it is for humans to predict what jobs are hardest to automate, and all truck and bus drivers know these jobs are much more difficult then white collar people (who has never ever driven a heavy vehicle) think they are.
For a CEO of a prolific tech company, he sounds quite dull…
It really does seem like tech companies in general have duds (in terms of charisma and public speaking) at the helm doesn’t it? 🤓
@@DaringCreativethat's the definition of nerds. They are the ones who make the money and change the world.
You watch too many movies! CEOs are in general dull tech nerds!
See Elon Musk : nerds has more ideas than the social mannerism or charisma, but if they are smart and rich they don’t need those formal things. (A nice voice , a “professional” and smooth way to say things, a cool persona etc… ) The majority of nerds are little bit like kids : they are themselves and they have an open mind , the sociality is not their priority
should i stop working as a Java developer and learn how to drive truck now?
First backend and front end Jobs will be gone because these type of jobs are the ones the ai is trained for.
Ai truck is release in some years self drive they dont need drivers
@@ashtron649do you think that broke farmers can afford self driving truck?
@@desrucca but big firm can
@desrucca and i think they somehow manage it
This guy.. sneakily setting up the biggest robbery of data in history and then calmly saying “who would have thought it would go this way?”
Yep.
This so-called Artificial "Intelligence" is just a cover for massive Intellectual Property thef.
He's saying it's the smart machines that we can't stop, while stealing wholesale from every artist on the Internet.
He's trying to legalise theft by pointing to a computer algorithm.
Bro looks like a ai robot too ngl😂
😂
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
But cost of buying AI will be huge , will it feasible for a organisation 😊
I went to a job interview where I was going to be interviewed by an AI HR manager 😡. A staff member guided me to a room where there was a desk and a laptop. He told to sit there and follow the instructions in the computer… I had to watch a video and then I could leave…. The video was an introduction about the job, compensation, requirements… then the video interview questionary so 😮really freaked out just right there and got up and went out to ask the staff member if I was going to be interviewed by a real human and he said no, that was the interview (I drove 35 miles to the “interview” 😫 I told the staff member that I refused to be interviewed by and AI system.
He just seem indifferent with my answer like he didn’t care and that was ok for them 😢
Blue collar jobs are done once the physical mechanics of robots can be perfected and commercialized. Robots will be able to do more, do it faster, and without any rest breaks.
This is probably already possible, just not cheap enough to warrant changong to robots
@Ant-Uomo as a 14 year software developer, you will be amazed what's possible once you make everything granular.
Everything that's seems very complex is just a series of steps. Now these mini steps can be put into a series of step groups, and when you unite 25 steps groups out of hundreds of step groups combinations you get the robot changing the 98 corolla alternator with ease.
If there's something missing (bug) the devs (robots or humans) will just add that missing step(s), and now more step groups can be formed.
This was the "old" way btw.
New way is you do millions of possible steps and step groups in a test enviroment (model training) and then you obtain the ones that work by brute forcing all of these millions steps into the test site and see what works.
So the first week of the test the robot will be the clumsiest thing ever, just like a newborn baby trying to operate a computer.
And just as a baby grows and learns, it will become better, just by testing millions of things and receiving feedback. The difference between the robot and baby is that the robot will learn 100000X faster because you can test stuff with dozens, hundreds of robots 24/7 and feed it into the training of one central model that updates the robots with every minuscule breakthrough in real time.
So, you do this 24/7 for, let's say 5 years, the robot will get so advanced it will be able to completely remodel your car if you give it the tools and materials.
If you can put the whole task in words and it doesn't require emotions, faith, feelings, lifestyle, physical attractiveness, social network, "showmanship", security clearances, or coming out with extremely radical ideas, deep phylosophical thoughts, etc, then it's over.
The thing is... blue collar wages will plummet as white collar workers out of a job transition into the industry
:/
good luck many blue collar workers refuse to take on apprentices and unions let people join based on market conditions and how much work is there and jobs are based on seniority also it takes about 5 years to finish most high paying trades red seals
I would wholeheartedly disagree, if anything, this is the age of "the creative", suddenly you have a tool that can help bring your vision to life without needing a wealth of knowledge or a team of people. Ai brings new meaning to the idea that we're only bound by our imagination.
I love your perspective on this Arian. It's refreshing to see someone actually excited about what potential can be unlocked in doing work. Thanks for sharing this!
b o r i n g
We already have this, it's called dreams, and almost nobody wants to hear what someone else dreamed.
I hope so
It's not a matter of easy or hard, it's a matter of tangible and untangible. AIs are already pretty convincing (more or less) at emulating visual and audio media, but our current technology isn't able to connect AIs to mechanical devices on a large scale (for example to build a robot at home to clean the house and take out the trash). But it will soon, any task is potentially replaceable. And I'm pretty sure that it won't take a 100 years...
You’re rich: Take some voice lessons.
he's rich. he doesn't give a flying fuck about your opinion
@georgesimon2730 Even though he should
Ultimate creative jobs and hard blue-collar jobs are hard to impossible to replace but the others will be easily replaced.
wait he has no regret for stealing jobs 😂
Engineering departments / staff can be halved already this year 2023.
Sure boy, you don’t understand how slow market adopts. 99% of average people doesnt know about any AI tool.
It will take years
@@user-mo7ul6fk8b ye AI was “released” a year ago in November in the form of ChatGPT.
Guess what no one is using it anymore
That was a bit of an exaggeration. Remember what he said about predictions?
Bro what engineering team are you working on that can be replaced by an llm? Lmao
@@RomeTWguy It's been 1 year anyways, the prediction never came true. Not even close. Maybe like 20 years from now, if at all. This just shows you how people are losing their minds with AI hype.
The voice frying though 🫨
The valley fry and the hoodie.
My favorite part about generative AI is that it won’t do a damn thing unless you ask it to. Additionally, it will only do a good job if you know HOW to properly ask it to do something. High skilled jobs aren’t being replaced, they’re evolving with the use of the tools provided by the fruits of their own labor.
Why doesn't AI replace this ghoul?
He's awesome I like him.
@@vectoralphaSecyou are gay
@@vectoralphaSec You are your kind are the enemy of humanity.
Exactly, because AI are not great at job, that require motion and repair, I am happy that I chose electricians job career.
There's more money to be saved by eliminating High paid jobs, so companies using AI are focused on that
So are we in era of AI ?. Maybe yes or maybe no.
I think this music *'In the year 2525' *by Evans and Ziegler can help to explain more about AI, human beings and this era. I love that.
My dad told me to listen to that song, and it is indeed trippy.
@@DaringCreative Thanks. You know the things we see or do today came to some people's imaginations that led to fiction books and movies. It is like telling us to get ready for things like that to come in future. Years later human imaginations through scientific studies and inventions made it possible.
Also some music videos like 'Take a train to Clarksville' by the Animals was made many years before the invention of the mobile /smart phones. Imagine that kid riding with phone in his hand. It was unthink of those years. Now it is possible to ride on a bike or car and talk to anyone anywhere in the world without any problem.
Thanks to the United States inventions and innovations that is helping the entire world to think positive and move forward. I love that.
I wish you all the best of luck.
Whi will buy your product if they have no money ?
Anything that has to do with people's feelings will remain. People only trust people. For example, a machine will replace most engineers, but a person will be needed to check its work and be responsible for the result to other people. It's the same with human safety. Food safety experts, firefighters, security-related service workers. All of these can be partially replaced, but here, people prefer people more. It's purely human.
I'm a handyman. I think I'm good for a minute.
Looks like finally i can go back to farming now
Automation is already taking the body intense jobs.
Good or bad?
@@DaringCreative as one who makes the machines; good. Less loss, less mistakes, less use of ressources over all. AI is good for code, but not the code programs we often use. Those are in ladder not in structural text. That is also changing. The reason why everything probably will not be automated, is because there are to many variables and it will often cost too much to set up, compared to just get a guy to do it. As we institude more standards, automation will take over.
Take my home, I have removed a lot of things from the floor and instead found things to hang on the walls, like a closet into a cupboard. This is done just so my robot vaccum cleaner can get around and do the best job.
People will lose their minds if they get replaced by AI and then they will think about destroying AI because it is taking jobs
This man should be put behind bars and his company should be shut down
Why it's not illegal ?
It's just marketing and he can't predict the future, we make together the future with new tools regardless if you want it or not
@@thatsalot3577i think making anything which have enough potential to remove almost everyone from jobs is immoral and illigal as well.
Technology and innovation is done to make things easier this dumb people are making things easier but will they make every thing free of cost because i am seeing the world where all the jobs are going in the hand of AI and soon GPU will become enough fast and powerful, database centre will increase drastically every thing will improve AI will make it powerful and creative then us. Will they guarantee us that after that they will make a world where we will get everything free of cost since i don't see a single job in that world
@@hombacomfuture is dark in hand of AI mark my words we have to stop such innovative ideas. This people will soon take everything from humanity and will leave us poor and slave
@@ApurbMishra I mean we can think that, it's immoral, unethical and scummy but not illegal, for that to happen goverment has to intervene and let's say if US and EU decide that no AI should be used to manage certain things...
You know what would happen ? China may not agree to you or Russia or India and in that case people would just outsource the work from that one country who's not following the rule, so it's not really a valid solution.
We as people have to evolve in ways where we think not in terms of labour but in terms of problems in our society and an interface to solve them,
Like it still takes around 800-2000 people to make a decent triple AAA game,
Imagine that but by 10 people, there's a crazy cost involved in reaserch and it gets funded very less Maybe when the labour becomes insanely cheap we might be able to accelerate at an insane rate.
I'm pretty sure AI will eventually be pretty good at programming work or doing much of the work. Making the majority of programmers unemployed. Top 20 per cent maybe keeping their jobs to do the most difficult work and overseeing the whole process.
He doesn't really know what he is talking about most of the time
The problem is not what is hard or not but the fact that Ais are different respect the creation of many type of physical robots, and the process is faster. But drive a car or doing some manual job is still not hard for our mind , respect programming or writing a good book, create a nice movie etc… Is only a problem of the different development in technologies and not about what is hard for us and for our mind, many intellectual jobs are always been hard
AI has been trained on the data that was created by most creative and amazing people in the world, and now you are saying that ai woukd replace those people ? Unlikely AIs success is because of there is data available to learn which was created by these amazing people.
its all theft! and nobody protects the artists
The reason we predicted that AI would take creative jobs last is because it makes absolutely no sense to automate those jobs. It makes more sense to automate jobs that require back breaking labor and pay low wages, but yet here we are with Open Ai and others CHOOSING to automate the higher skilled jobs first. Not very well either by the way.
Let’s talk about Vocal fry
😂
Alright guys we’re gonna be truck drivers from 2030->2032 all you doctors and lawyers too. Get your asses ready for that truck cushion
Do AI can replace religious gurus job?
I’d be okay with that 😂
I’ve thought that too, the idea of a super intelligent AI that gives advice becoming a cult 😂
@@TheIgnoramus 😂😂
They are rock solid in their positions since 5000 BC
Lol
I refuse to buy from companies that use AI for their customer service.
We should
It's not that creative jobs are less difficult. It's that they leave more room for error. Putting brush strokes in the wrong place is a lot less disastrous than putting some code in the wrong place.
To be fair, AI is really good at coding... like really good. It might actually come for programmers first at this point
Who lied to you? Do you know how many times i called those ai chats for their mistakes ? They can't code shit, and if there is an error they don't even see it, once i had a bug because i mistyped something that is just 1 that should've been -1, you won't believe how many times those 20 lines been reviewed by the Ai without noticing it until i debugged it bu myself 😂 , many many times i felt like this chatbots are shit and only relay on stackoverflow, these bots are meant to help you google stuff faster and not code actual code believe me 😂 @@MrAfrodisiakOo
"Predicting things is hard, especially the future."
ai has not replaced a single person
there are shops in china & japan that don't use clerks / shopkeepers anymore
Ai can't create any job its logically impossible AI is made only to replace jobs and give profit to rich company owner. The main thing is that when goverment will stop this crap
Wrong
AI have not created a single job
Prompt engineering is a job that a five year kid can learn. Shameful world will be silent and keep watching AI to take all jobs and soon the all wealth in world will shift in hand of few powerful rich capitalist people like Elon Musk, Sam Altman and we all will be the slaves
Yet …
The perspective of value
He is like: whatever, those are just numbers not people, is their fault for not being creative and rich.
He is a psychopath.
Walmart has already started
Seems everyone will be replaced by AI. I don’t know what we’ll do then. Play tennis I guess.
reproducing, constructing shelter and enjoying ourself
@@Zinzinnovichmake sure your shelter is strong enough for a thousand AIs who'd write a new programming language for themselves to gain consciousness and decide to hack into a Japanese robot factory's frameworks and build themselves physical bodies
@@Zinzinnovich Oh yeah, like the good old pre-civilization days.
@@Zinzinnovichthe ai will probably be constructing the shelter for us … but sure
AI in the futiure can play better tennis than Djokovic..a perfect tennis robot
Important discussion on AI's impact on jobs! Prepare for the future with SmythOS, an AI tool that helps you stay ahead in an evolving job market. #AIJobs #SmythOS
SAM Kardashian
I like to see it this way:
The invention of car has not made people completely stop walking. It has made going from part a to part b much faster but a lot of people still like to walk that distance. I think the same could be said about ai, it will just be an additional tool or advantage for us. I dont think it will replace programmers, artists and other jobs completely. They will definitely make it lot easier and be also used widely but wont replace humans completely. This to say when ai becomes as useful as cars though. I think ai is in the early ford model cars stage where they used to run at like 50 hp and people used to be shocked to see that, same with ai.
Arrogance is bliss for some it appears.
- You still need a human to fix the leak under your kitchen sink or build a house.
farming is better i think
They will go for the places where people complain about wages. Fast food chains are the first.
First it came for SAM
Wild
Temporarily
@@sarthak2348lol, then Sam came for the board
يبشمهندسه هل لسه البرمجه حجات زي front end و back end مازالت وظيفه عليها طلب دلوقت يعني المجال بقا فيه ناس كتير غير تأثير الذكاء الاصطناعي
it is in demand
AAAAND HE'S FIRED
This was crazy! And somewhat unexpected at least for me. wow.
AAAAND HE'S BACK
@@sarthak2348 AAAND he invited AGI future AAAND it remove almost everyone in every sector
There we can't say the shit that (AI will not replace you a person using AI will replace you) since AGI will have enough potential that it will not need any human intervention and will understand things own its own just like humans
Someone should tell this dude a robot can't cook a steak. Even if it could, someone's gotta put the steak in front of the robot.
Mark my words It won't happen
How will the economy function if AI replaces most jobs, leading to widespread unemployment and reduced consumer spending? Won't companies lose revenue and struggle to survive? How will the economic system adapt to this shift?
AI is destroying the lives of creative artists such as painters and graphic designers, because companies simply hire an AI studio to do their job at a fraction of the cost.
At some point, I expect this to end, because AI models have been trained using products created by humans, without their permission and without giving anything in return. This violates copyright laws and represents a form of unfair competition.
Eventually, the Supreme Court will have to rule on this issue, and Congress can also do its part by taxing the hell out of AI companies, which are destroying jobs and punishing creative people, who don't deserve to be treated this way by scammers who use technology to profit off of someone else's work.
Silicon Valley tech billionaires, dictating humanities future.
So what we learned is that you should always take note of the class position of the people making predictions