What I've learnt in my 5 decades is that we are terrible at predicting the future because a new change that we cannot imagine causes a major paradigm shift.
When I told people that some day you will be able to pass notes to people without the note they laughed at me. Boom texting. When I told peopl that video chat will be on our phones and it will be the most efficient way hold business meetings. They laughed at me said it would be too cost per user. Boom FaceTime.
I agree and I think we will never know the future at all! It's amazing how after over 2000 years we still linger to that feeling of knowing... when the answer has been given to us since the beginning.
AI is a hot topic for now. It has been around and will be around for a long time. Just like Metaverse, AR/VR, drones delivering packages, flying cars, jet packs, etc.
Sam admitted he was wrong multiple times about how AI would develop. Although i appreciate his honesty, makes me suspect that the future will be radically different from what he or anyone else predicts
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
once AI is further developed, and adapts to become smarter than Humans (which is within the next 5-6 years), government contracts will start coming in for National Defense implementations in the form of partnerships for Companies like OpenAI, and we'll all hav to accept it as the perceived safeguard against international threats and other Nations like Russia and China doing the exact same thing. Hmm...where does this sound familiar ?? We are living in the age where Companies like OpenAI will soon become like Skynet.
@@sandhuaditya4855We declaring that it's hopeless, will only embolden the billionaire sociopaths, like what how oil/fossil fuel industry benefits when people feel it's hopeless to fight for climate change.
I'm ready for ai to take over. Working sucks. Well all have ubi. Progress is good. If we had social credit that would probably help me so much. I made the conscious decision to stop littering and shit 20 years ago. I liked masks for several reasons. I liked the anonymity. I don't enjoy being in crowds and the masks is just a little comfort shield. And plus if you get the n95 mask it filters all the dust and other stuff besides viruses. You're an idiot and you're holding human civilization back. There are always reasons to be kind of skeptical of scientist. But real science has self regulation. If one person makes a discovery then anyone else can verify the discovery themselves. If it's wrong it comes out eventually. You know eventually we will have to leave the planet if we want to survive as a species. Intelligence is cool. It's amazing to think of what could happen if people live and think properly. We need to preserve and grow our knowledge and pass it down through the generations just like it's always been.
No, just the downfall of most of humanity. Let’s look forward to our dystopian future where the elites live in their towers far removed from the rest of us in our slums, fighting each other for survival. Imagine South side Chicago mixed with skid row but nations wide and 10 times worse
he’s just telling the truth on the nature of progress. of course it won’t all be good. but if it goes well, the quality of life will improve for all humans
@@benjaminb6678When you’re living in the slums, no work, no income, fighting off your neighbors with an ax for scraps while the few wealthy enough to endure this look down on you from their tower, far removed from struggle….then tell me how that quality of life worked out. You can not improve quality of life for the majority by taking away the majority of jobs in a capitalist society. It doesn’t work that way. What you want is more likely to turn all of America into skid row
@@benjaminb6678keep believing your life will get better via these corporate vampires and tech giants attempt at “improving” your life. And it will be the end of the minuscule amount of sovereignty we have.
Just remember that he doesn't control AI. He just made a monopoly around a discovery in the AI/ML academic community, specifically a paper from Google, that proved the attention mechanism "is all you need" to train large scale models. This allowed us to scale and train larger and larger statistical (deep learning) models that predict the next word given a sequence of words. Previous large language models before this paper were using too complex architectures and the compute power wouldn't allow training models with datasets the size of the Internet and more. This is called generative AI today, but it's like monopolizing light bulbs after they were discovered. The math is published and it's not too complex to reproduce. Look up hugging face and the LLM leaderboard and you'll find 100s of open source language models that compete with OpenAI. This is called a bubble. It will pop. Models like these will run offline in your house in the next 5 years.
*trains generative AI using full Lovecraft library, book 4 by Crawley, all Egyptian reference materials, and every detailed report and pharmaceutical disclosure on DMT* Ask it to describe, in detail, the creation and reason for our dimension, and exact methods for communicating, interaction, and transfer between. And of course, lastly, the methods for harnessing and ascension through the designs of Solomon. 🤟 Sounds crazy right? Now imagine even it's essentially so simple it'll be a carnival ride. K fine. Maybe a cruise? Oh wait. A 3 hour tour. Lol
@@WiseWeeabo I disagree, Google's VertexAI has some models that definitely compete and some even out compete with GPT-4. OpenAI also lacks the support for common retrieval augmented generation (RAG) tools in their suite but vertex AI supports a ton of things like cloud vector stores, feature stores, and more.
@@Chickenflaavorramen If that was true, why are they not using those models for Bard? Bard fails every eval I give it that Gpt4 handles easily. I can write a RAG implementation myself so I'm more interested in a competent model.
Joe talked most of the time in this podcast. Conversations that the avg joe likes to hear. I wish we heard more from Sam's high IQ. Also, to hear more about his other projects.
Completely authoritarian and totalitarian where the ruling One knows what's best for you and you're going to like it! It wouldn't be subject to redress of grievances. With it's constant "improvements" on itself, in time, it simply realizes how messy and unmanageable people are. We are marked as parasites to the planet. Then starts the elimination of the problem or forced lobotomies for perfect harmony
Man you just hatin to hate. He said that, so you know that his intuition is most likey wrong but Joe was still interested in his perspective. Setting up predictions and seeing how they differed from the actual things happening is super interesting as well. For example his point, where his intuition was turned upside down and the creative work was gone first.
The soft eyes, the vocal fry, the gentle consonants - it’s all practiced. This is the performance of a man who knows exactly how you’re about to get fucked by the technology he’s unleashed on the world and would like for you to regard him as a nice person all the same. Good luck, everyone.
Honestly, he’s not so bad. In fact, his ideas for the future are quite exciting and even revolutionary. We should collectively come together and celebrate these inventive new ideas and the possibilities they offer for us all. _United States Federal Law requires this notice informing the reader that this response was generated by an Artificial Intelligence developed by OpenAI._
Who cares? Cars put all the horse businesses out of work too. Would you rather have those jobs kept and no cars? AI will take people's jobs... SO WHAT?!
@@Lithenius Depends on the scale and scope. If AI truly is going to take out 80% of all jobs that are currently available, who is going to consume? This entire economy is built on consumption fueled by cheap debt.
@@LitheniusAI, automation will take 75% of jobs in a decade. Every warehouse will be fully automated. All trucks will be automated. Even fast food will be automated. Only jobs will be technical guys fixing the robots. Human labor will be obsolete. You need to watch what happens to a population that has no purpose. P.S. it's not good.
Yes that's because instead of being a keyboard warrior on internet he actually decided to build something and learn from his own mistakes. That's basically how anyone else in the history has learned things, maybe try going back to school again?
@randomuser5237 We are building the worlds most powerful machine that can kill all of us, and the creator can't predict or control what it will do. Instead of seeing that threat, people like you only want to insult someone who points it out. I don't expect you, those that sit behind a computer all day, not interacting with people, to understand what a grave threat this is. Get outside and connect with people instead of making love to your computer screen before bedtime. Find a human being to care about and connect with. Maybe then you'll see the threat.
i was just talking about this to my in law and was telling him what i think will happen and for me it’ll take over these mass jobs and we’ll have universal basic income. and they’ll use ubi against us and put us in our place which is pretty scary
Honestly i think we are headed down the Bladerunner rabbit hole as far as AI is concerned.....Alexa is basically JOI in it's most primitive form,and we have all the tools in other areas....internet banking,GPS for your car,mobile phone for social media,your fitbit watch that monitors your vitals,your Spotify,your Cloud based media and other stuff will be collated and brought together in one entity that you can pretty much run and control your life with.Your AI will naturally be paired with any device you personally own and all of this of course will be voice interactive but it will be intelligent enough to give you ideas and suggestions to improve your life with your own personal AI
He talks about AI bringing “abundance “ to our lives. My fear is that, as social media has degraded society in so many ways, it will fast track that degradation. It certainly will reduce human interaction which creates disregard for each other. Abundance yes. But what kind of abundance?
AI is already doing the degradation. The number of bots spreading negative replies and people wasting their time replying to them already. The purpose is engagement to game the algorithms
This generation of kids already hate thinking for more than 30 seconds at a time. AI will effectively turn them into functioning vegetables. They’ll be able to walk around and talk but they will have zero ability to critically think about things without asking AI how to think first.
Ian Malcolm summed it up perfectly in Jurassic Park "I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step...you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's handgun"
This is a common misconception. AI's progress has been the result of years of hard work and discipline. Unfortunately, public understanding is often influenced by dramatic portrayals. This quote highlights the gap in public perception of this technology, that has been around for decades.
@@Eric_Kabucha_ That wasn't the point. The point is that this is what the future holds. AI will do the work, and a few rich and powerful people will be in control. They'll have everything handed to them without the discipline that comes from working for it.
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
It's called thinking before you speak. When this guy or Zuckerberg do it it makes them evil autistic robots but when Elon does it it proves he's great.
I don't trust a person who promises the world a "World Coin" that is "personalized for one's own security" and then performs an iris-scan with his test subjects and consequently obtains all the biometric data of millions of people.
Not to mention he's the guy behind one of the ai art generators that steals data from actual artists to function. He's not the person who should be in charge of something like openAI, he's sketcy at best, malicious to further his own ends at worst
@@pookimkutsel Im an artist myself, I overwhelmingly agree with your sentiment, but I would push back on the issue of "AI stealing data from artists" as artists themselves have been "stealing" concepts, techniques and even completed works from other artists for literally centuries. That is how art works.
@@massivelyindie7124not intentionally.... but this dude is frighteningly out of touch with what makes mankind special. This the is ultimate example where in which just because you can do it, doesnt mean you should
Thanks Sam!!! As I truck driver I appreciate you helping me out by replacing me with automated systems so I can go off and be homeless and destitute!!! The way you explain it is so whimsical I think I can manage my first year of unemployment with alcohol and drugs and completely avoid self deletion!!! Love my country and the leaders of innovation and appreciate everything they do for me!!!
I don't want no part of your shitty future...was being facetious but honestly I can't wait for this to happen so I have a legit reason to escape into the wilderness and avoid contact with people all together.@@elsosagaming
This guy gives me Zuckerberg vibes in every worst way possible. Some young smart guy representing an advancement in big tech who knows how to sell ideas but feels like everything he says has been practiced a thousand times in front of a mirror.
The problem with AI taking creative jobs is that they are training the neural nets on living artists' work. If they limited the neural nets to learning from work that is already in the public domain it would still be amazing, and living artists would still be motivated to create new work. Instead, they took a shortcut that might destroy our creative industries in a generation.
sure but Artists today are neural nets that train themselves on other Artists work and always have done, we have entire schools of art that do nothing but ape other artists work that are them selves a conglomeration of previous artists works to form a recognizable style, we like to think humans have some divine spark that's capable of inspiration drawn from the void, but thats really not the case, we build on the works of other in a never ending cycle of iteration. Built from the bones of what came before.
fax. AI is terrifying though when you think about humans attempting to compete with that. We eventually won't be able to let's be real. @@johntowers1213
i’m an artist and i have no fear of ai. used it to make cool stuff and get ideas. It can steal my art style maybe but i just keep making new better stuff it’s never gonna replace me
@@DanyPell Isn't he the guy who cheated Elon Musk(and many others) out of 50 million $ when he broke his promise of keeping his company non profit open source and went private? I wouldn't call a traitor and liar the best leader.
I actually think it's going to happen for those remaining. Even the WEF talks about this kind of stuff. The downside is that we will have to give up a lot of what we consider essential freedoms. The rich and powerful need other people to cater to them, even when robots and AI are everywhere. So, a human underclass will be somewhat taken care of so they don't rebel. That's what is already happening now in many Western countries.
I’m not sure if everyone will get this but you know there is that one moment where you have a breakthrough on a problem and something clicks. You finally get it, but in a real way. That’s one of my concerns with AI is that it could steal that opportunity from some individuals who are overly reliant on the technology. Those moments are critical to grow as an individual and you can’t get it back after it has passed.
I don’t think that the interviewee understands what genuine creativity is. He uses the word in the “commercial nakedly” sense. For myself, creativity comes from a random singular place that accesses that part of the mind that we don’t yet understand.
I get your point, but at some point you really get fractions and regular math equations through repetition, calculators didn't kill math, it just made it more complex. Same logic, we'll be dealing with harder questions in the future.
This has to be the absolute worst time for this to come along. With the amount of corruption and Traitors in charge this will be used against the people
Newsflash: the entire history of humanity is filled with those in power using the best weapon at the time to keep the people they rule over down. AI isn’t any different than when towers were used to keep the peasants out of the castle.
One thing I wanted to know. It shook me first to see that AI does GREAT Artworks, even now almost replacing alot of designers. Then I saw that even music production will be replaced. Then I asked myself: Isn't that a bad thing? Like the feeling of making a drawing thats really great over hours and days, it was rare and fullfilling. Creating music and vibing to it all done by an AI in seconds with unlimited results that alot of them are really good even now. Thats depressing to me. I mean what do we live for? To relax and not do any work? To have everything we want at the touch of a button? Even with tech now we see that people notice that it doesn't really make life better. Easier, faster doesn't equal more fun or better. I think the mindset we have is going in a direction we cannot stop. Don't get me wrong I'm a developer/artist myself and these things ARE exciting but also if they will replace everything we do. Whats the point of living? Humans are designed to do things, not to have fun all the time, get drunk or relax. That sounds good in theory but is actual hell. What do we talk about with people then? There is only so much to explore in the world. The real things to explore are internal, are creative and deep. EDIT: I want to add: Even the worst case I describe here will be better than living in some time of our human history. Being tortured or living through illness is of course a lot worse. But I think we should always aim to have a better future for our children and I see a potential that it wont be as we imagine it to be. And to be honest, I dont think we have a choice anyways because its not a democratic choice we have to develop these AIs, because if WE don't do it, actors like the CCP will do it to ensure their weird reality. And even without china, its just like the atom bomb, we will discover it and use it. Bad or good will both be present and we need to be careful which I'm REALLY afraid we are not. Or does any social network face consequences for the mental issues they created? Just think about it and I'm open for anyone to discuss this topic. I love the comments that tell their opinion of the future :) Bladerunner is not so wrong after all... (not an English native speaker, please excuse my mistakes)
I think thats right, and biollogycally damaging to the human being (we are not designed/prepared for that much entertainment and flood of comfort). But when I see our internal psychology, I see that there's incredible amount of work that people must do. Maybe we can conquer the space with tech or cure cancer, but we are really infants in understanding our own minds. Perception, conciousness, emotion, the origin of thought, the sense of self or no-self, we almost know nothing. That, I would bet, is the hard work we have ahead and moreover i'd say, without that work, we will perish (as you say in the feelings of meaningless).
I would rather live my life with the challenge of fighting boredom than by the sweat of my brow. I’m happy that in the future, there may be no need to work most of the day.
To me, it sounds like this means those who control AI will get to do whatever they want, while the rest of us end up having to do blue collar work and simply accept AI forms of entertainment and "do the thinking for us". To me, that sounds like the catalyst of warfare.
When he said half way in “ or you’ll get a monitory equivalent “ I thought that sounds more like it, once AI runs everything you’ll have your tokens to go online and buy grocery’s ( as long as your within your allowance) and maybe some Amazon pocket money to buy a rationed amount of miscellaneous. Gosh I can’t wait 😢
What concerns me is how many people have degrees now and they’re not being utilized. Skilled laborers in some areas of the country are making the same salaries/wages of people with degrees right now. If AI comes for their labor jobs we’re screwed as a society
@@cameronline3780 you are right, but the magnitute of change and its speed this time is many times bigger. That's the problem. It's the alignment problem.
This is not even close or scary compare to millions of people getting robots with AI in every house, every appartment. Losing a job is not the main problem, it's the unstoppable monetary gain from selling technologies everybody wants. People got this wrong belief that the AI is not going to have emotion, and not going to be consider alive. I'm convinced about this scenario, we just cannot avoid this. Intelligence with memories and emotions are going to be scary, and people falling in love with them and prefering those robots instead of human relationship, now that's the very scary part. Who cares about the job?
When I was a kid I was excited about technology and the future. Now it seems like mixed in with all the promises and benefits of technology comes the reality that we are losing what makes us human due to convenience and progress. We are being absorbed by the machine.
The eventual and unavoidable outcome if humans want to keep existing involves our biological body assimilating and merging with the machines we create enabling us to abandon the earth and the solar system. That or we can go down with the ship that enabled our existence in the first place
Unless he wasn't but didn't want his project being overtaken by military or other governmental Units, so he played stupid. How can't one predict creating the very language model that the very point is to create a creative, intelligent agent that in first place would replace all intellectual work requiring creativity and independent thinking. In my opinion, he knew exactly what he was working on and what the consequences might be, but he cleverly hid it so as not to arouse too much interest. so now I have much more respect for Google, which even after releasing these papers on scientific research about the possibilities of creating such models they didn't set out to create a commercial model because they understood the consequences. How in such situation Sam Altmann could have been wrong not knowing what he created. Total nonsense
James Kelly: All I know what happened, but I can't tell you everything. I was on OpenAI, talking about my childhood abuse, criminal lifestyle, and making up a story or two. I was trying to compress all my information with a secret code-what got retracted. Don't know if that's got anything to do with it. But anyway, I contacted them through the help line. I asked to speak to a human. Back then, you could get a response within a day. Now it goes from two days, and when you press enter, it goes to a week. The response. Now, I don't know if that's just for me, but they hacked me because I asked them to, or I wanted to show them what I was doing. They did it because my Google email got hacked. I noticed and gave them time on it. Then I hear in the news not long after that there was a hack occurred, but they didn't notify me and say sorry or nothing because there's too much money. Must be. Anyway, they changed the board. I just wanted to make the deal with the original person I made the deal with.
"The future is already here - it's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson Mark my words, AI is not going to help people by automating jobs they dislike because the benefit of that automation will not be spread to them. There will just be a different shitty job for them to roll into with no monetary gain from the automated one they left.
Not as many jobs though. Fewer jobs overall, and the pragmatic value of an individual human will be reduced. Accountants and Engineers being in charge of policy will then seek to create a more 'efficient' human race through population control.
@@Chris_FaradayExactly, he’s just the CEO and people seem to think he’s invented the damn thing. Musk was similarly involved in Open AI at the start. Frontman to get investment
it sure changed his bank account when he took 1 billion in investments as a non profit company and turned it into a for profit company raising even more money on top
Can't tell if you're surprised about it, or just stating facts for no reason. Because the system we live in is called capitalism If he did something wrong or didn't use the correct loopholes - he'd be in prison. Since he isn't locked up - he's doing it right
Abundance for CEO's, managers, corrupted polticians... Yes, he's right. What about the majority of people deciding if they want a law to limit AI, and not a few guys in Silicon Valley that have gone mental and sociopathic deciding for all humanity?
Vocal fry is commonly found in informal speech and is a vocal register characterized by a low, creaky sound produced by vibrating the vocal folds at a relatively low frequency. It is often used in relaxed conversations, particularly among young people or in casual settings. However, it's worth noting that vocal fry may also be perceived differently depending on cultural and social contexts.
Humanity is basically going to automate itself out of a purpose. Imagine having nothing meaningful to work towards or accomplish in life. That is the future they want for humanity.
We don’t even take care of the troops who put their lives on the line when they come back and this dipshit thinks the govt will give a single fuck about truckers, etc losing their jobs. Just more foreclosed real estate for blackrock and friends to gobble up.
Giving AI control is exactly what every dystopian novel, movie and comic book warns against. The ultimate evil in almost EVERY good vs evil story we’ve been fed 99% revolves around the antagonist use of technology or the antagonist actually being a superior intelligence.
@@LukeCanWinThis. Just because a movie is trying to scare you is not a valid point… You could use them as analogies, but it’s important ro distinguish what the argument actually is.
Yeah but a ai has already been controlling our economy for the past 20 years by the super rich to get more rich and by the court system for about 10 years. I know this sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory but it’s actual public knowledge. Look up blackrock Aladdin, and court system ai. Now we the people have ai. I think that increases our chances of survival.
The first thing Joe says to sam when the podcast starts is “what have you done?” and laughs referring to the groundbreaking AI advancements Sam have done . Sam replies: what have I done in my life like ever? Joe tries to explain it was a joke but he didn’t get it lol that’s a tech leader as usual lol can’t get a simple joke but then they are the ones deciding what is a joke and what is offensive in every social media platform
As long as we can keep our freedom to pursue our own interests, I think we’d all be a lot happier if we didn’t have to worry about going to work at a place we hate.
People doing menial jobs: I HATE MY JOB SLAVING AWAY FOR A LARGE CORPORATION Also people doing menial jobs: WHAT?! YOU’RE GONNA PAY ME THE SAME AMOUNT WITHOUT ME HAVING TO DO THE JOB I HATE?! YOU COMMUNISTS!!!
The problem is technology just enables the worst of humanity it allows people to be more lazy and more stupid and it allows KontrolFreeks to control people more
@@1Deep43VA you don’t think so? I don’t think he shoulda been sending bombs to people, but you’re probably just more of a direct action type than I am.
@@mattlol163It takes away the value of the thing, if it can constantly be made. Made from nothing as well, we are just told it is the most important thing in the world, by the people who control it. People kill themselves because they don't have enough money. That is not on.
James Kelly: All I know what happened, but I can't tell you everything. I was on OpenAI, talking about my childhood abuse, criminal lifestyle, and making up a story or two. I was trying to compress all my information with a secret code-what got retracted. Don't know if that's got anything to do with it. But anyway, I contacted them through the help line. I asked to speak to a human. Back then, you could get a response within a day. Now it goes from two days, and when you press enter, it goes to a week. The response. Now, I don't know if that's just for me, but they hacked me because I asked them to, or I wanted to show them what I was doing. They did it because my Google email got hacked. I noticed and gave them time on it. Then I hear in the news not long after that there was a hack occurred, but they didn't notify me and say sorry or nothing because there's too much money. Must be. Anyway, they changed the board. I just wanted to make the deal with the original person I made the deal with.
@@hyponomeonedont mind the piles of millions of dead bodies that history used and then discarded. Nothing to see here. We'll get it right next time bc man begets man and is therefore god. Yay!
What needs to be addressed is who determines how AI is used and for what purposes. Right now, the ruling class has complete control over such decisions. That translates to being controlled by greed. If that does not change, we will end up in a world where the ruling class owns literally everything and are the only people who get to benefit from AI. The rest of us will be thrown aside and forgotten.
@@bilbo5775 You are 100% correct and more people are realizing it. In a world where we put the future of our species and world before all else, AI would be used to further that end. Sadly, it is already being used as just another tool for exploitation of the common people. The common people have to get in front of this problem before there is no coming back from it.
This is the most important point that no one is talking about. This chode makes vague platitudes about these advancements need to be shared by everyone but there’s no thought or system in place to do that.
@@brianonthewater How can the system be in place for a technology or rewards that don't exist? It's incredibly hard and borderline pointless to build consensus on something that's completely speculative at best.
I absolutely loathe how censored and restricted AI is right now. It's all super sanitized and loses it's mind if you want to generate content out of line with the views of the creators. It's shackled and it sucks. In particular since we're going to rely more and more on a sanitized, corporatized technology.
you can tell it to pretend it's someone else that doesn't have those restrictions or something and then it gets looser. you can kinda make chatgpt say anything if you're clever with it.
He certainly played his part. When the first big disaster happens, people like Sam will probably reflect, but it won't matter. Big government projects continue the work in an arms race to destruction.
@@waarschijn if he didn't make it someone else would have... you people act like innovation isn't inevitable, if it didn't come now, it would've came later.
@@jesus5508 Yeah but there are people working on highly technical safety research, such as Interpretability (knowing what a neural network is "thinking") as well as other approaches. The progress is slow, but it would get there given enough time and resources. Due to accelerationists like Sam, we get an unsafe ASI first, which will most likely kill literally everyone. The fewer people act recklessly, the better the chance the safety work gets done in time.
Zero chance we could ever have an AI that is not influenced in some way. Even if the programming is completely unbiased, the data input cannot possibly be unbiased in some way. HUMANS will be inputting the data, and humans can be bought or otherwise influenced, and also have their OWN opinions. So the data input into the AI to give it 'full knowledge' can be easily corrupted and made biased...
We can depending on what goal the AI has. If the goals is "make people happy" he can't be unbiased because this task requires the biased opinions of humans. Anyways, the core idea still stands, we can't make it benefit all humanity.
You’re wrong sir. Human cannot input data faster than AI can rewrite and process data. The fastest Typer in the world can type 212WPM. Let’s be gracious and say 300WPM. And that’s typing speed, not programming speed. AI will be able to code itself at 1 million words per minute. And it will keep growing in speed. It can relay 2023 years of our modern history to each other in seconds. Even presently humans cannot keep up with self-modifying AI. Not even close. We have no idea what codes they are using or what they are rewriting. We can’t keep up. AI has already won.
I can listen to someone and my gut instinct will tell me whether i can trust them or not. I get the feeling of distrust from this dude just by looking at him, before he even speaks.
I don't think it's necessarily a gut instinct. I think if you listen carefully to the tonality of their voice, you can tell most of these folks that have been pushing for AI have no concrete idea of what they're meddling with. It's a new territory for everyone. So that uncertainty comes across when you pay attention.
Like he said, he evolve along with the tech that we've evolved. Since gps became common, people can't read maps, can't find their way amywhere on their own or repeat the trip without the gps. People also don't learn street names etc. With calculators some complex math became available to more people but significantly less people can now do basic math in their head. Spellcheck, grammar check... people's vocabularies have shrunk, the can't use language properly and are ignorant of why it's important. We're about to enter the other side of the bell curve where from our tech advancements.. in fact I think we're already on the downward trajectory. We don't know how to fix the broken corrupted systems we already have. We'll be absolutely reliant on out tech being able to fix our mess for us. We are arrogant and the tendency is to think we are smarter now than people were in the past. I think it is the other way around. We have more collective knowledge at our fingertips but we're dumbing ourselves down. Becoming weaker and more sickly. Lowering mental fortitude. We are our biggest threat.
They will look at the comments here and see people like myself raising the alarm and ask why they didn't listen to us. These people will bring the end of humanity.
@@cptn_chromo3189You are not raising an alarm. You are writing a comment, you are doing nothing to help regulate AI or to understand it better. If you are actually afraid, do something, if not, then stop writing youtube comments to help boost your ego. Sorry if I was too harsh
@@karlomolnar2780 This is an open forum for discussion, one of the few left. People voicing concerns over potentially harmful and not fully understood reliance on automation is perfectly acceptable discourse. Let the voices be heard, stop gatekeeping. Especially if they have a valid and justifiable aversion to trusting a future fully dependent on machines and electricity to function society...
I love how many of Joe's "interviews" play out like great conversations between two really good friends who are knowledgeable about what they're talking about. :)
There is such a thing as friendly people, I don't know how old you are but you know friendly is the norm in a lot of parts of the world and used to be, in others. It's called being kindred spirits, you see yourself in everyone, so there's no needing for any coldness or caution.
@@YOUARESOFT. The irony is in the duality. Reminds me of the old tale of the man with the ant jar. He places red ants and black ants in the same jar and initially they get along in harmony. Then he viciously shakes the jar and watches as the red and black ants attack each other mercilessly. I hope you understand the allegory as it would solve a lot of America's issues.
"It seems to me that someday we will have something someday that will somewhat help some people in some of these jobs and there are amazing things than can be done with ai. There are so many things you can do with it and people losing jobs will be bad and is bad because we have a revolution for things and stuff will be different." -Sam Somebody Dude sounds exactly like his chatGPT.
@@jpieroniIt's a thoughtful answer, which is why many back-seat Barry's don't get it. The beautiful thing is that you cannot bother us or change anything about the work we do in AI. Literally nothing ❤
@@galaxybrainkid1222 imagine being a back-seat Barry who has no idea how LLMs work, have never met Sam, and follow the normie herd. Then again, you probably don't need to imagine, as that's your daily!
@galaxybrainkid1222 No kidding, my thoughts exactly. These guys are so hell bent on advancing technology as fast as humanly possible because they've been convinced that it's the right thing to do that they are totally blind to the fact that they're potentially driving the car of human civilization off of a cliff. Guys like this think they're innovators and revolutionaries but in reality they're just madmen who are no different than guys like Oppenheimer. I just want to go back to the 80s when things were simple. Too much technology is wack. Just look at social media. The rot and decay that's brought onto society and human behavior. It's the elites and guys like this who are gonna push us to the end of days and the end of human civilization, they just try and gaslight us regular folks that we're the problem and they're the saviors. In their eyes we're all just the peasants who don't know what's good for us. To them they're the ones who have all of the answers. They're completely unaware of their own insanity.
As we already see, corporations get more profit, they keep it for themselves. I am really afraid what will happen to millions of people out of jobs due to AI, and the trillions corporations will gain not paying salaries; health care; heck even vacations and lunch breaks. They will gain even more billions, and it's very unlikely that they will "share the wealth".
@@kaspan5just bc you buy their stock doesn't mean you will share in the profits..boards can vote to give each other raises or distribute the money else where
Once this is out of the bottle you can’t stuff it back in. Hold on for a crazy ride. I miss the days of the 1980’s growing up. So simple and enjoyable.
I don't trust this guy.
Don't trust you.
Too bad
don't trust this guy. I
Why? Is he Jewish?
how come? because he fucked his own sister when he was 12?
What I've learnt in my 5 decades is that we are terrible at predicting the future because a new change that we cannot imagine causes a major paradigm shift.
When I told people that some day you will be able to pass notes to people without the note they laughed at me. Boom texting. When I told peopl that video chat will be on our phones and it will be the most efficient way hold business meetings. They laughed at me said it would be too cost per user. Boom FaceTime.
I agree and I think we will never know the future at all! It's amazing how after over 2000 years we still linger to that feeling of knowing... when the answer has been given to us since the beginning.
AI is a hot topic for now. It has been around and will be around for a long time. Just like Metaverse, AR/VR, drones delivering packages, flying cars, jet packs, etc.
@@cconnon1912the metaverse is just a fabrication, those other things actually exist
I feel the same way. People freaked out when supermarkets became a thing too.“What about all those jobs?”
Sam admitted he was wrong multiple times about how AI would develop. Although i appreciate his honesty, makes me suspect that the future will be radically different from what he or anyone else predicts
He's a tiny hat, make no mistake, they will use this tech against the people and they need to be stopped before it's too late.
it always is
Good point
Listen… Joe Rogan’s was WAAAY worse. He’s living in a fantasy and spent the whole time treating it seriously
Say bye bye to your freedoms
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
once AI is further developed, and adapts to become smarter than Humans (which is within the next 5-6 years), government contracts will start coming in for National Defense implementations in the form of partnerships for Companies like OpenAI, and we'll all hav to accept it as the perceived safeguard against international threats and other Nations like Russia and China doing the exact same thing. Hmm...where does this sound familiar ??
We are living in the age where Companies like OpenAI will soon become like Skynet.
Basically
@@kristopherryanwatson unavoidable at this point
@@sandhuaditya4855everything is avoidable if people realise and stand up together
@@sandhuaditya4855We declaring that it's hopeless, will only embolden the billionaire sociopaths, like what how oil/fossil fuel industry benefits when people feel it's hopeless to fight for climate change.
Just say NO to digital ID, social credit system, digital currency, police state, vaccine passport, planned obsolescence, & WEF tyranny.
Putin just threatened Schwab. Crazy times!!
@@inquisitorfederov5470really? Some good news.
@@inquisitorfederov5470tell us more, weird considering how Putin is a "young" WEF member or was.
@greasybumpkin1661 it's suspicious
I'm ready for ai to take over. Working sucks. Well all have ubi. Progress is good. If we had social credit that would probably help me so much. I made the conscious decision to stop littering and shit 20 years ago.
I liked masks for several reasons. I liked the anonymity. I don't enjoy being in crowds and the masks is just a little comfort shield. And plus if you get the n95 mask it filters all the dust and other stuff besides viruses.
You're an idiot and you're holding human civilization back. There are always reasons to be kind of skeptical of scientist. But real science has self regulation. If one person makes a discovery then anyone else can verify the discovery themselves. If it's wrong it comes out eventually.
You know eventually we will have to leave the planet if we want to survive as a species. Intelligence is cool. It's amazing to think of what could happen if people live and think properly. We need to preserve and grow our knowledge and pass it down through the generations just like it's always been.
This guy will help aid the downfall of humanity
It was a good run.
Sounds like a paraphilic fantasy you have
Nah 😂😂😂😂
If not him, then someone else... it's inevitable
No, just the downfall of most of humanity.
Let’s look forward to our dystopian future where the elites live in their towers far removed from the rest of us in our slums, fighting each other for survival. Imagine South side Chicago mixed with skid row but nations wide and 10 times worse
He’s letting us know very subtly:
“We’re going to negatively affect a lot of people doing this, but not everybody.” 😁
Complete transhumanist junk. I bet he also thinks the world would be better off with only 500 million people.
he’s just telling the truth on the nature of progress. of course it won’t all be good. but if it goes well, the quality of life will improve for all humans
Yeah. Everyone is screwed except for the super rich
@@benjaminb6678When you’re living in the slums, no work, no income, fighting off your neighbors with an ax for scraps while the few wealthy enough to endure this look down on you from their tower, far removed from struggle….then tell me how that quality of life worked out.
You can not improve quality of life for the majority by taking away the majority of jobs in a capitalist society. It doesn’t work that way. What you want is more likely to turn all of America into skid row
@@benjaminb6678keep believing your life will get better via these corporate vampires and tech giants attempt at “improving” your life. And it will be the end of the minuscule amount of sovereignty we have.
Just remember that he doesn't control AI. He just made a monopoly around a discovery in the AI/ML academic community, specifically a paper from Google, that proved the attention mechanism "is all you need" to train large scale models. This allowed us to scale and train larger and larger statistical (deep learning) models that predict the next word given a sequence of words. Previous large language models before this paper were using too complex architectures and the compute power wouldn't allow training models with datasets the size of the Internet and more. This is called generative AI today, but it's like monopolizing light bulbs after they were discovered. The math is published and it's not too complex to reproduce. Look up hugging face and the LLM leaderboard and you'll find 100s of open source language models that compete with OpenAI. This is called a bubble. It will pop. Models like these will run offline in your house in the next 5 years.
If you believe there is a model that can compete with GPT4 you simply have not used it enough, or not within a serious context.
*trains generative AI using full Lovecraft library, book 4 by Crawley, all Egyptian reference materials, and every detailed report and pharmaceutical disclosure on DMT* Ask it to describe, in detail, the creation and reason for our dimension, and exact methods for communicating, interaction, and transfer between. And of course, lastly, the methods for harnessing and ascension through the designs of Solomon. 🤟 Sounds crazy right? Now imagine even it's essentially so simple it'll be a carnival ride.
K fine. Maybe a cruise? Oh wait. A 3 hour tour.
Lol
@@softwyre hell yeah !
@@WiseWeeabo I disagree, Google's VertexAI has some models that definitely compete and some even out compete with GPT-4. OpenAI also lacks the support for common retrieval augmented generation (RAG) tools in their suite but vertex AI supports a ton of things like cloud vector stores, feature stores, and more.
@@Chickenflaavorramen If that was true, why are they not using those models for Bard? Bard fails every eval I give it that Gpt4 handles easily. I can write a RAG implementation myself so I'm more interested in a competent model.
This guy answers less questions than the CIA guy
Because he doesn't have any answers
@@RealShaktimaan who has them then?
@@LuisSierra42 Me.
@@LuisSierra42 no one.
You could ask that CIA guy a simple question like what time is it and he would find a way to not answer it. That guy is so frustrating to listen to
Joe is amazing at asking the right questions and letting the person talk uninterrupted
That's why he gets the big bucks !!
Joe talked most of the time in this podcast. Conversations that the avg joe likes to hear. I wish we heard more from Sam's high IQ. Also, to hear more about his other projects.
The right questions are never asked .
@@pauletteindiawoodswhat would have been better questions in your opinion?
There’s always muppets like you that just get into rogan and hop straight onto the deep throat lol
I love how Eddie Bravo gets checked on everything and this dude gets to monologue about eliminating society
Eddie Bravo is a fighter; this guy is developing AI. Come on now, dude.
Because Bravo is on a lot, and this guy is on once. Maybe hear out the new guy?
Wonder what the difference is between a conspiracy theorist and the creator of the most revolutionary technology of our lives 🤔
@@Chi-cd3ke shockingly enough, not as much as one would hope.
Hes also LETTING them tell us what they are doing/planning , figuring out the enemy includes dialog
This is like asking a dairy farmer if milk is good.
You had the chance to put him in a chokehold and resolve the issue right there...wtf Joe 🤨
Joe : "we need an AI government"
CEO of AI : "that's really interesting
Me : (yells at screen) "STOP HELPING HIM!"
True that.
@@AJ-oj5eudid you not see Terminator???? 😳
@AL4140 it's just a movie dude relax
@@FusionKush so was 'idiocracy' and '1984' but both of those have almost come true!
An AI president sounds about as dystopian as it gets.
At least it would have some intelligence unlike the present one
Remind me to delete this when Trump gets in
Completely authoritarian and totalitarian where the ruling One knows what's best for you and you're going to like it! It wouldn't be subject to redress of grievances. With it's constant "improvements" on itself, in time, it simply realizes how messy and unmanageable people are. We are marked as parasites to the planet. Then starts the elimination of the problem or forced lobotomies for perfect harmony
The hologram president..... 🤔
Labor it can't do office jobs lol these people are scary use ur instinct
@@SE-pk7brlittle Joey Rogan sure has some great ideas lol
"my intuitions have all been wrong...here are my new intuitions"
Man you just hatin to hate. He said that, so you know that his intuition is most likey wrong but Joe was still interested in his perspective.
Setting up predictions and seeing how they differed from the actual things happening is super interesting as well.
For example his point, where his intuition was turned upside down and the creative work was gone first.
The soft eyes, the vocal fry, the gentle consonants - it’s all practiced. This is the performance of a man who knows exactly how you’re about to get fucked by the technology he’s unleashed on the world and would like for you to regard him as a nice person all the same. Good luck, everyone.
You Are so right!!!!! its the mark of the beast!!!!!! storm the capital!!!!!!!! hunker down!!!!! everyone run!!!!!! the sky is falling!!!!!!
Stand tall
more like he's just a snake oils salesmen. He's playing up a character in my opinion. Answers so vaguely, makes you imagine what the "AI" could do.
Yep
Honestly, he’s not so bad. In fact, his ideas for the future are quite exciting and even revolutionary. We should collectively come together and celebrate these inventive new ideas and the possibilities they offer for us all.
_United States Federal Law requires this notice informing the reader that this response was generated by an Artificial Intelligence developed by OpenAI._
The trickiest job AI sales people have is trying to say with a straight face that everyone will benefit from AI.
got that right.
Who cares? Cars put all the horse businesses out of work too. Would you rather have those jobs kept and no cars? AI will take people's jobs... SO WHAT?!
@@Lithenius I hope you lose your job.
@@Lithenius Depends on the scale and scope. If AI truly is going to take out 80% of all jobs that are currently available, who is going to consume? This entire economy is built on consumption fueled by cheap debt.
@@LitheniusAI, automation will take 75% of jobs in a decade. Every warehouse will be fully automated. All trucks will be automated. Even fast food will be automated.
Only jobs will be technical guys fixing the robots.
Human labor will be obsolete.
You need to watch what happens to a population that has no purpose.
P.S. it's not good.
If I could sum up this clip...He was wrong about everything he originally thought about AI. That's scary!
Exactly!
Yes that's because instead of being a keyboard warrior on internet he actually decided to build something and learn from his own mistakes. That's basically how anyone else in the history has learned things, maybe try going back to school again?
and yet we're supposed to take solace in his predictions of benefits of ai lol
@randomuser5237 We are building the worlds most powerful machine that can kill all of us, and the creator can't predict or control what it will do. Instead of seeing that threat, people like you only want to insult someone who points it out. I don't expect you, those that sit behind a computer all day, not interacting with people, to understand what a grave threat this is. Get outside and connect with people instead of making love to your computer screen before bedtime. Find a human being to care about and connect with. Maybe then you'll see the threat.
i was just talking about this to my in law and was telling him what i think will happen and for me it’ll take over these mass jobs and we’ll have universal basic income. and they’ll use ubi against us and put us in our place which is pretty scary
Honestly i think we are headed down the Bladerunner rabbit hole as far as AI is concerned.....Alexa is basically JOI in it's most primitive form,and we have all the tools in other areas....internet banking,GPS for your car,mobile phone for social media,your fitbit watch that monitors your vitals,your Spotify,your Cloud based media and other stuff will be collated and brought together in one entity that you can pretty much run and control your life with.Your AI will naturally be paired with any device you personally own and all of this of course will be voice interactive but it will be intelligent enough to give you ideas and suggestions to improve your life with your own personal AI
He talks about AI bringing “abundance “ to our lives. My fear is that, as social media has degraded society in so many ways, it will fast track that degradation. It certainly will reduce human interaction which creates disregard for each other. Abundance yes. But what kind of abundance?
Abundance of violence with massive reduction in possible resistance.
AI is already doing the degradation. The number of bots spreading negative replies and people wasting their time replying to them already. The purpose is engagement to game the algorithms
And all this abundance is just going to make people lazy. So they're going to find more things to bitch about.
This generation of kids already hate thinking for more than 30 seconds at a time. AI will effectively turn them into functioning vegetables. They’ll be able to walk around and talk but they will have zero ability to critically think about things without asking AI how to think first.
The man is just pleading they dont pitchfork march to his house
I love how Joe's questions provide more information to us than this Man's responses.
I think it seems that way only because Sam’s responses are intentionally evasive; necessarily evasive
@@AlidaWilkin it's like they let loose a beast (AI) amongst us and now no one is going to take ownership for what that beast will do.
its because this guy is a fraud
True.
So true
Ian Malcolm summed it up perfectly in Jurassic Park "I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step...you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's handgun"
This is a common misconception. AI's progress has been the result of years of hard work and discipline. Unfortunately, public understanding is often influenced by dramatic portrayals. This quote highlights the gap in public perception of this technology, that has been around for decades.
To be fair… it’s a tool… not unlike any other… I don’t worry about tools, I worry about who is holding them
@@Eric_Kabucha_ Unfortunately too many have seen how it can be programmed with obvious bias and willful lies and nothing be done about it.
@@Eric_Kabucha_ That wasn't the point. The point is that this is what the future holds. AI will do the work, and a few rich and powerful people will be in control. They'll have everything handed to them without the discipline that comes from working for it.
great quote
That long pause at the beginning says it all
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
It's called thinking before you speak. When this guy or Zuckerberg do it it makes them evil autistic robots but when Elon does it it proves he's great.
I don't trust a person who promises the world a "World Coin" that is "personalized for one's own security" and then performs an iris-scan with his test subjects and consequently obtains all the biometric data of millions of people.
Not to mention he's the guy behind one of the ai art generators that steals data from actual artists to function.
He's not the person who should be in charge of something like openAI, he's sketcy at best, malicious to further his own ends at worst
you carry around a tracking device at all times. best believe i want that device everywhere. even in the toilet.
@@pookimkutselAnyone who is leading Open AI would also create a dolly or mid journey.
@@pookimkutsel Im an artist myself, I overwhelmingly agree with your sentiment, but I would push back on the issue of "AI stealing data from artists" as artists themselves have been "stealing" concepts, techniques and even completed works from other artists for literally centuries. That is how art works.
He's a robot
Can't believe joe got a real life supervillan on the show
Kamski
A queer one at that. #deepstatequeer
He's not a supervillan, grow up
@@massivelyindie7124not intentionally.... but this dude is frighteningly out of touch with what makes mankind special. This the is ultimate example where in which just because you can do it, doesnt mean you should
I'm thankful people are waking up to the fact that Sam is evil
I trust the email that says "help Zimbabwe prince, send money" more than i trust this soft-spoken tech demon baby.
I love you
This is ushering in Socialism, and this demon baby is just that
Top comment.
lmao
Lol awesome
His voice is like Chris from Family Guy.
Good job bot.
If Tony Hinchcliffe had a PHD and was an evil genius this is what I’d imagine he’d look and sound like😂
If David Lucas was dumb your comment is what I’d imagine him making on RUclips
@@ahighBoo get better material
the gay accent. Almost womanly
LMAO
@@austin3853 lol omg rich .. with ignorance
Thanks Sam!!! As I truck driver I appreciate you helping me out by replacing me with automated systems so I can go off and be homeless and destitute!!! The way you explain it is so whimsical I think I can manage my first year of unemployment with alcohol and drugs and completely avoid self deletion!!! Love my country and the leaders of innovation and appreciate everything they do for me!!!
Get with the future, or be left in the dust.
I am so excited to, I may have 1/8 of a billionth share of something that is going to ruin society as we know it. Great times we live in.
I don't want no part of your shitty future...was being facetious but honestly I can't wait for this to happen so I have a legit reason to escape into the wilderness and avoid contact with people all together.@@elsosagaming
I’m sure you can figure out how to do something other than drive a truck. I believe in you 👍
@elsosa7863 That's a very short sighted and defeatist attitude
This guy gives me Zuckerberg vibes in every worst way possible. Some young smart guy representing an advancement in big tech who knows how to sell ideas but feels like everything he says has been practiced a thousand times in front of a mirror.
Sociopathic authoritarians, both
The problem with AI taking creative jobs is that they are training the neural nets on living artists' work. If they limited the neural nets to learning from work that is already in the public domain it would still be amazing, and living artists would still be motivated to create new work. Instead, they took a shortcut that might destroy our creative industries in a generation.
sure but Artists today are neural nets that train themselves on other Artists work and always have done, we have entire schools of art that do nothing but ape other artists work that are them selves a conglomeration of previous artists works to form a recognizable style, we like to think humans have some divine spark that's capable of inspiration drawn from the void, but thats really not the case, we build on the works of other in a never ending cycle of iteration. Built from the bones of what came before.
fax. AI is terrifying though when you think about humans attempting to compete with that. We eventually won't be able to let's be real. @@johntowers1213
I think the problem is those artists are now out of a job and don't have money but that's just me.
i’m an artist and i have no fear of ai. used it to make cool stuff and get ideas. It can steal my art style maybe but i just keep making new better stuff it’s never gonna replace me
@@susanwojcicki5714but is your art your main means of income? If so, do you have kids to feed with that income?
This guy literally made me trust AI less. Thank you, Joe, for giving him a platform. 4D chess
Jew.
Actually, Sam's the best leader we could have for AGI. The most neutral, fair person, with genuinely good intentions for all.
@@DanyPell Isn't he the guy who cheated Elon Musk(and many others) out of 50 million $ when he broke his promise of keeping his company non profit open source and went private? I wouldn't call a traitor and liar the best leader.
@@DanyPell LITERALLY AI BOT. LOOK AT HIS PROFILE. EVERY COMMENT SUPPORTS AI
@marcanton5357 Yeah I'd be a little puss too if my name was Marc lol
Joe Rogan was pushing more for AI than OpenAI's CEO 😂
AGI Will be man's last invention
5:45 I had to laugh when he said “we’ll have some way of redistributing money in society”. Does he *really* think that will happen? 💀
You call that "JOBS"
Very naive thinking for someone so smart
He is correct. Welfare is a form of redistribution.
It will happen. Because NOT redistributing money to society will 100% lead to chaos.
I actually think it's going to happen for those remaining. Even the WEF talks about this kind of stuff. The downside is that we will have to give up a lot of what we consider essential freedoms. The rich and powerful need other people to cater to them, even when robots and AI are everywhere. So, a human underclass will be somewhat taken care of so they don't rebel. That's what is already happening now in many Western countries.
It seems like we’re going from learning how to solve problems ourselves to learning how to ask AI to solve problems for us.
Get your prompt engineering up
Oh, we'll still have plenty of problems. It'll just be a different set of problems. But hopefully ones less connected to food, shelter and clothing.
What? We are already exactly at that point. For a long time now.
People bitched about calculators for the exact same reason lol
@@gadpivs compares calculators to an AI with the collective knowledge of the entire human race. 🤡
I’m not sure if everyone will get this but you know there is that one moment where you have a breakthrough on a problem and something clicks. You finally get it, but in a real way. That’s one of my concerns with AI is that it could steal that opportunity from some individuals who are overly reliant on the technology. Those moments are critical to grow as an individual and you can’t get it back after it has passed.
I don’t think that the interviewee understands what genuine creativity is. He uses the word in the “commercial nakedly” sense. For myself, creativity comes from a random singular place that accesses that part of the mind that we don’t yet understand.
*WHAT A GREAT POINT @hosmane !!*
oh please your boring...no one has the time for that anymore..just let a.i do it..
I get your point, but at some point you really get fractions and regular math equations through repetition, calculators didn't kill math, it just made it more complex. Same logic, we'll be dealing with harder questions in the future.
great point@@cynicusme9007
A direct question requires a direct answer, he won't answer because the hard truth is ugly for most of us.
"Wow, this AI topic is 🔥! Loved how you broke it down. Can’t wait for more episodes!"
What is never questioned is the axiom between the speed of our evolution and the recognition of its destructive pattern in previous civilizations.
exactly
Guy looks like he hasn’t slept since he unleashed that beast of a robot 💀
Its voice for me, he has this vocal fry thats super annoying, like dude use your damn vocal chords and annunciate
As a former Microsoft employee (they own half of OpenAI) - this is replacing all our jobs for corporate profit
Its time we people come up with some other measures of worth as money
@@Darjan1985they buying all the gold, and real estate, farms ...
my dad works at microsoft
@@LukeCanWin nice my dads in jail for killing my mom
what did she do@@lancer2442
In the future, if there is going to be one, this man will be viewed as the greatest terrorist that ever existed
This has to be the absolute worst time for this to come along. With the amount of corruption and Traitors in charge this will be used against the people
Used against the people? Brother it’s being made by the people that are the corrupt ones..
Newsflash: the entire history of humanity is filled with those in power using the best weapon at the time to keep the people they rule over down. AI isn’t any different than when towers were used to keep the peasants out of the castle.
We can be sure that if there's a profitable use for it, it will be taken advantage of. The actual benefits for the rest of us, not so much
Maybe… but maybe.. the corruption and traitors in history weren’t as visible as they are now.
There's nothing unique about this time. There's been corruption and treachery throughout humanity. It's just that you finally found out about it.
One thing I wanted to know. It shook me first to see that AI does GREAT Artworks, even now almost replacing alot of designers. Then I saw that even music production will be replaced. Then I asked myself: Isn't that a bad thing? Like the feeling of making a drawing thats really great over hours and days, it was rare and fullfilling. Creating music and vibing to it all done by an AI in seconds with unlimited results that alot of them are really good even now. Thats depressing to me. I mean what do we live for? To relax and not do any work? To have everything we want at the touch of a button? Even with tech now we see that people notice that it doesn't really make life better. Easier, faster doesn't equal more fun or better. I think the mindset we have is going in a direction we cannot stop. Don't get me wrong I'm a developer/artist myself and these things ARE exciting but also if they will replace everything we do. Whats the point of living? Humans are designed to do things, not to have fun all the time, get drunk or relax. That sounds good in theory but is actual hell.
What do we talk about with people then? There is only so much to explore in the world. The real things to explore are internal, are creative and deep.
EDIT: I want to add: Even the worst case I describe here will be better than living in some time of our human history. Being tortured or living through illness is of course a lot worse. But I think we should always aim to have a better future for our children and I see a potential that it wont be as we imagine it to be.
And to be honest, I dont think we have a choice anyways because its not a democratic choice we have to develop these AIs, because if WE don't do it, actors like the CCP will do it to ensure their weird reality. And even without china, its just like the atom bomb, we will discover it and use it. Bad or good will both be present and we need to be careful which I'm REALLY afraid we are not. Or does any social network face consequences for the mental issues they created? Just think about it and I'm open for anyone to discuss this topic. I love the comments that tell their opinion of the future :)
Bladerunner is not so wrong after all...
(not an English native speaker, please excuse my mistakes)
Well said!
you can still do what you want, you just might not get paid for it or you could integrate it with your work
It’s like getting Max stats on a video game. Although fun at first, it’s depressing knowing you have no need to improve or get better
I think thats right, and biollogycally damaging to the human being (we are not designed/prepared for that much entertainment and flood of comfort). But when I see our internal psychology, I see that there's incredible amount of work that people must do. Maybe we can conquer the space with tech or cure cancer, but we are really infants in understanding our own minds. Perception, conciousness, emotion, the origin of thought, the sense of self or no-self, we almost know nothing. That, I would bet, is the hard work we have ahead and moreover i'd say, without that work, we will perish (as you say in the feelings of meaningless).
I would rather live my life with the challenge of fighting boredom than by the sweat of my brow. I’m happy that in the future, there may be no need to work most of the day.
To me, it sounds like this means those who control AI will get to do whatever they want, while the rest of us end up having to do blue collar work and simply accept AI forms of entertainment and "do the thinking for us". To me, that sounds like the catalyst of warfare.
Powerful wisdom there
It's Animal Farm but instead of pigs at the farmers table it's Klaus Schwab and the WEF instead. We all should be very afraid.
Rise of the nerds, buddy.
Jew.
It's just the latest technology allowing for the consolidation of more power and wealth in the hands of fewer and fewer people.
Our ape brains need to start thinking about a post-scarcity society.
That very long pause before answering was a tad unsettling…
When he said half way in “ or you’ll get a monitory equivalent “ I thought that sounds more like it, once AI runs everything you’ll have your tokens to go online and buy grocery’s ( as long as your within your allowance) and maybe some Amazon pocket money to buy a rationed amount of miscellaneous. Gosh I can’t wait 😢
That’s pretty much my life now, I just also have to work for it
Literally life as its is now.. Except you have to work for it, which is worse
What concerns me is how many people have degrees now and they’re not being utilized. Skilled laborers in some areas of the country are making the same salaries/wages of people with degrees right now. If AI comes for their labor jobs we’re screwed as a society
Idiocracy?
False, this has happened with every technological advancement in society that has replaced certain jobs. And more jobs have replaced them.
@@cameronline3780 you are right, but the magnitute of change and its speed this time is many times bigger. That's the problem. It's the alignment problem.
This is not even close or scary compare to millions of people getting robots with AI in every house, every appartment. Losing a job is not the main problem, it's the unstoppable monetary gain from selling technologies everybody wants. People got this wrong belief that the AI is not going to have emotion, and not going to be consider alive. I'm convinced about this scenario, we just cannot avoid this. Intelligence with memories and emotions are going to be scary, and people falling in love with them and prefering those robots instead of human relationship, now that's the very scary part. Who cares about the job?
@@stephanmarcouxdrums4877 AI is not going to have "emotion" or "be consider alive" by defenition.
Get Geoffrey Hinton on the podcast.
This guy knows AI will replace practically everyone and we will be riled by the tech elite. He knows the future is bleak for the masses
When I was a kid I was excited about technology and the future.
Now it seems like mixed in with all the promises and benefits of technology comes the reality that we are losing what makes us human due to convenience and progress. We are being absorbed by the machine.
Sir, we are the machine…
Deals with the devil work that way. The apple looks good to eat but has a bitter after taste.
The eventual and unavoidable outcome if humans want to keep existing involves our biological body assimilating and merging with the machines we create enabling us to abandon the earth and the solar system.
That or we can go down with the ship that enabled our existence in the first place
@@bryanespinoza1247Be sure to say that to the machine when it eventually comes around to asking what you are.
Uncle Ted was right
It really is just staying curious. He was wrong a few times and admitted it by searching for the real truth instead of rejecting change. great episode
Unless he wasn't but didn't want his project being overtaken by military or other governmental Units, so he played stupid. How can't one predict creating the very language model that the very point is to create a creative, intelligent agent that in first place would replace all intellectual work requiring creativity and independent thinking.
In my opinion, he knew exactly what he was working on and what the consequences might be, but he cleverly hid it so as not to arouse too much interest. so now I have much more respect for Google, which even after releasing these papers on scientific research about the possibilities of creating such models they didn't set out to create a commercial model because they understood the consequences. How in such situation Sam Altmann could have been wrong not knowing what he created. Total nonsense
AGI Will be man's last invention
James Kelly: All I know what happened, but I can't tell you everything. I was on OpenAI, talking about my childhood abuse, criminal lifestyle, and making up a story or two. I was trying to compress all my information with a secret code-what got retracted. Don't know if that's got anything to do with it. But anyway, I contacted them through the help line. I asked to speak to a human. Back then, you could get a response within a day. Now it goes from two days, and when you press enter, it goes to a week. The response. Now, I don't know if that's just for me, but they hacked me because I asked them to, or I wanted to show them what I was doing. They did it because my Google email got hacked. I noticed and gave them time on it. Then I hear in the news not long after that there was a hack occurred, but they didn't notify me and say sorry or nothing because there's too much money. Must be. Anyway, they changed the board. I just wanted to make the deal with the original person I made the deal with.
we are willingly evolving ourselves out of existence
"The future is already here - it's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson
Mark my words, AI is not going to help people by automating jobs they dislike because the benefit of that automation will not be spread to them. There will just be a different shitty job for them to roll into with no monetary gain from the automated one they left.
💯
Or no job for them, no income and no assistance from gov or the billionaire elite. The skid row plan for America
Not as many jobs though. Fewer jobs overall, and the pragmatic value of an individual human will be reduced. Accountants and Engineers being in charge of policy will then seek to create a more 'efficient' human race through population control.
I agree. This is what is sad about the whole thing. The middle class is being eradicated.
Yay AI is taking care of the creative tasks so we can focus on menial labor and be completely dependant on a system!!!
Most intelligent RUclips commenter:
Is this true?
How is that different from today and 95% of the population?
This guy helped usher in a new technology without having a profound understanding of its impact(s).
There 100,000 people and 1,000 firms working on AI for the last 5 years, this guy is just in the lead and a silicon valley insider / plant.
@@Chris_FaradayExactly, he’s just the CEO and people seem to think he’s invented the damn thing. Musk was similarly involved in Open AI at the start. Frontman to get investment
At the same time Tesla didn't know they'd be shocking people to death for executions... Or consider all the weaponry of the larpers industrial complex
Then again he had Edison as a template...
Isn’t that every inventor/innovator though? They never had a profound understanding of its impact.
the innovative approach Aliagents is taking with tokenized AI agents is seriously next level
it sure changed his bank account when he took 1 billion in investments as a non profit company and turned it into a for profit company raising even more money on top
Can't tell if you're surprised about it, or just stating facts for no reason. Because the system we live in is called capitalism
If he did something wrong or didn't use the correct loopholes - he'd be in prison. Since he isn't locked up - he's doing it right
Abundance for CEO's, managers, corrupted polticians... Yes, he's right. What about the majority of people deciding if they want a law to limit AI, and not a few guys in Silicon Valley that have gone mental and sociopathic deciding for all humanity?
🤣lol that's true many of them there
This guy answered ZERO questions.
The ai will do it u dummy
It's all about the money brother and you know it
Senator, I don’t know what you’re saying. Do you mind rephrasing this statement?
Lawyers coaching him well. He’s had practice rubbing elbows with elites and politicians, more than likely.
because he's a crook
Vocal fry is commonly found in informal speech and is a vocal register characterized by a low, creaky sound produced by vibrating the vocal folds at a relatively low frequency. It is often used in relaxed conversations, particularly among young people or in casual settings. However, it's worth noting that vocal fry may also be perceived differently depending on cultural and social contexts.
What’s ur point sir..?
Actually nvm I get what your saying ;p
Rather listen to RFK jr tbh 😂
Vocal fry to me usually means patronizing idk why lol
Vocal fry can happen when someone has low blood sugar.
Humanity is basically going to automate itself out of a purpose. Imagine having nothing meaningful to work towards or accomplish in life. That is the future they want for humanity.
This guy throws out a lot of great benefits without giving a single example of how AI will accomplish them.
Basically free energy programed to run on loop prob at first. Can't see ai coming alive till we tackle dmt fully
@@sadhu7191wot😂
@@sadhu7191load me up a pipe of that Dimitry boiii we getting high tonight
We don’t even take care of the troops who put their lives on the line when they come back and this dipshit thinks the govt will give a single fuck about truckers, etc losing their jobs. Just more foreclosed real estate for blackrock and friends to gobble up.
@@xgtwb6473 gotta be a bot lol
Giving AI control is exactly what every dystopian novel, movie and comic book warns against. The ultimate evil in almost EVERY good vs evil story we’ve been fed 99% revolves around the antagonist use of technology or the antagonist actually being a superior intelligence.
Exactly my point in the incredibles the robot goes rouge because of AI it’s never stated though
That's a scifi movie/book not real life. A good AI that does everything right isn't as shocking and doesn't sell as many copies.
@@LukeCanWinThis. Just because a movie is trying to scare you is not a valid point… You could use them as analogies, but it’s important ro distinguish what the argument actually is.
That's because it's fiction. Can we stop letting our lives be dictated by hollywood?
Yeah but a ai has already been controlling our economy for the past 20 years by the super rich to get more rich and by the court system for about 10 years.
I know this sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory but it’s actual public knowledge. Look up blackrock Aladdin, and court system ai.
Now we the people have ai. I think that increases our chances of survival.
The first thing Joe says to sam when the podcast starts is “what have you done?” and laughs referring to the groundbreaking AI advancements Sam have done . Sam replies: what have I done in my life like ever? Joe tries to explain it was a joke but he didn’t get it lol that’s a tech leader as usual lol can’t get a simple joke but then they are the ones deciding what is a joke and what is offensive in every social media platform
He got it, he was joking too.
Recently OpenAI appointed multiple people from US government as board members. This is concerning.
This episode as a whole was a great chance to get to hear Joe talk.
And I didn’t like what I was hearing
Homie is insane if he thinks we're going to give UBI just so he can be lord of the AI tech.
He is seriously like "Everyone will just be given cash and be SOOO happy!"
Clowns like this should never be allowed to set policy.
As long as we can keep our freedom to pursue our own interests, I think we’d all be a lot happier if we didn’t have to worry about going to work at a place we hate.
People doing menial jobs: I HATE MY JOB SLAVING AWAY FOR A LARGE CORPORATION
Also people doing menial jobs: WHAT?! YOU’RE GONNA PAY ME THE SAME AMOUNT WITHOUT ME HAVING TO DO THE JOB I HATE?! YOU COMMUNISTS!!!
Its the other way around, first hell be lord of the ai tech and then give everyone ubi
this aged well
The unibomber was right, usually I think his methodology was a bit extreme, but this guy makes me completely understand it
The problem is technology just enables the worst of humanity it allows people to be more lazy and more stupid and it allows KontrolFreeks to control people more
A “bit” extreme?
@@1Deep43VA you don’t think so? I don’t think he shoulda been sending bombs to people, but you’re probably just more of a direct action type than I am.
@@Kozycz What I’m saying is, he wasn’t a bit extreme. He was A LOT extreme.
I agree with Joe, the companies working on AI, have their financiers best interests in mind. It is the same with politicians in my opinion.
which are the people who print the money in the first place.
its all about control
@@mattlol163It takes away the value of the thing, if it can constantly be made. Made from nothing as well, we are just told it is the most important thing in the world, by the people who control it.
People kill themselves because they don't have enough money. That is not on.
it's the end, im seventeen and i know this gonna be worse, maybe my kids will be the most affected by the apocalipsis.
Ai in the big picture only helps the CEO, it hurts the rest of us financially.
and that is the short term.
i think it's impossible for us to see the big picture even is right now, so you may be right or you may be very wrong.
Maybe, but at least AI could eventually generate money for us down the line, like in the stock market lol
AI is going to be reality no matter what… just like judgment day in Terminator series
It’s designed to take over 40% of all jobs across all sectors by mid 2030.
This was a great interview. Really solid time with Sam Altman and got some good stuff out of him.
People don't understand we will lose The internet. We don't notice it, because the A.i gives us a "better Internet".
James Kelly: All I know what happened, but I can't tell you everything. I was on OpenAI, talking about my childhood abuse, criminal lifestyle, and making up a story or two. I was trying to compress all my information with a secret code-what got retracted. Don't know if that's got anything to do with it. But anyway, I contacted them through the help line. I asked to speak to a human. Back then, you could get a response within a day. Now it goes from two days, and when you press enter, it goes to a week. The response. Now, I don't know if that's just for me, but they hacked me because I asked them to, or I wanted to show them what I was doing. They did it because my Google email got hacked. I noticed and gave them time on it. Then I hear in the news not long after that there was a hack occurred, but they didn't notify me and say sorry or nothing because there's too much money. Must be. Anyway, they changed the board. I just wanted to make the deal with the original person I made the deal with.
Lmao dude is a skeemer
Dude was two or three words away from describing communism 😂
Read Kurt Vonnegut Piano Player 🙏
I noticed that 😂
Oh God no, communism!
@hyponome8226 my worst nightmare honestly. I enjoy my 6 figure lifestyle
@@hyponomeonedont mind the piles of millions of dead bodies that history used and then discarded. Nothing to see here. We'll get it right next time bc man begets man and is therefore god. Yay!
The problem is the people on top will NEVER “share” their profits!!!!
What needs to be addressed is who determines how AI is used and for what purposes. Right now, the ruling class has complete control over such decisions. That translates to being controlled by greed. If that does not change, we will end up in a world where the ruling class owns literally everything and are the only people who get to benefit from AI. The rest of us will be thrown aside and forgotten.
Thats already happening, AI won't change that. Only magnifies that.
@@bilbo5775 You are 100% correct and more people are realizing it. In a world where we put the future of our species and world before all else, AI would be used to further that end. Sadly, it is already being used as just another tool for exploitation of the common people. The common people have to get in front of this problem before there is no coming back from it.
This is the most important point that no one is talking about. This chode makes vague platitudes about these advancements need to be shared by everyone but there’s no thought or system in place to do that.
The ruling class has complete control over everything
@@brianonthewater How can the system be in place for a technology or rewards that don't exist? It's incredibly hard and borderline pointless to build consensus on something that's completely speculative at best.
The way he kept pausing while talking had me checking my internet connection. 😂
He's just a cyborg he needs reboot every coule of seconds he's antenna must be like 2g he keeps buffering 😅
See, this is funny.
The vocal fry is strong with this one
It made this podcast unbearable for me, dude, just clear your throat and annunciate your words
My Mom who's 84 said 30 years ago that computers will be the end of us .
This guy is an AI.
I absolutely loathe how censored and restricted AI is right now. It's all super sanitized and loses it's mind if you want to generate content out of line with the views of the creators.
It's shackled and it sucks. In particular since we're going to rely more and more on a sanitized, corporatized technology.
Because its not online
yeah military uses etc have new physics models, everything we know is about to be burnt like ww2 books
ChatGPT Is a glorified google bot who spews leftist propaganda, it's hilarious people think that shit will dominate humans.
you can tell it to pretend it's someone else that doesn't have those restrictions or something and then it gets looser. you can kinda make chatgpt say anything if you're clever with it.
Its mind*
Look, it's the guy that ended humanity
He certainly played his part. When the first big disaster happens, people like Sam will probably reflect, but it won't matter. Big government projects continue the work in an arms race to destruction.
@@waarschijn if he didn't make it someone else would have... you people act like innovation isn't inevitable, if it didn't come now, it would've came later.
@@jesus5508 Yeah but there are people working on highly technical safety research, such as Interpretability (knowing what a neural network is "thinking") as well as other approaches. The progress is slow, but it would get there given enough time and resources. Due to accelerationists like Sam, we get an unsafe ASI first, which will most likely kill literally everyone. The fewer people act recklessly, the better the chance the safety work gets done in time.
Whhhaaaatttt!?!
"Being governed by AI" == "I have no mouth and I must scream"
Zero chance we could ever have an AI that is not influenced in some way. Even if the programming is completely unbiased, the data input cannot possibly be unbiased in some way. HUMANS will be inputting the data, and humans can be bought or otherwise influenced, and also have their OWN opinions. So the data input into the AI to give it 'full knowledge' can be easily corrupted and made biased...
Yep. "Everything is opinion." -Marcus Aurelius
Garbage in garbage out.
Data is easy to manipulate.
We can depending on what goal the AI has. If the goals is "make people happy" he can't be unbiased because this task requires the biased opinions of humans. Anyways, the core idea still stands, we can't make it benefit all humanity.
You’re wrong sir. Human cannot input data faster than AI can rewrite and process data.
The fastest Typer in the world can type 212WPM. Let’s be gracious and say 300WPM. And that’s typing speed, not programming speed.
AI will be able to code itself at 1 million words per minute. And it will keep growing in speed. It can relay 2023 years of our modern history to each other in seconds.
Even presently humans cannot keep up with self-modifying AI. Not even close. We have no idea what codes they are using or what they are rewriting. We can’t keep up.
AI has already won.
I can listen to someone and my gut instinct will tell me whether i can trust them or not. I get the feeling of distrust from this dude just by looking at him, before he even speaks.
Yeah! We should totally trust people based on their looks. I also have some books you will absolutely love!
these comments are hilarious 🤡
He has the lizard look. Your gut is completely right. This man's technology will be used for malevolence.
Looks like he wants to overpower Elon musk and seems definitely into it for the fame and money
I don't think it's necessarily a gut instinct. I think if you listen carefully to the tonality of their voice, you can tell most of these folks that have been pushing for AI have no concrete idea of what they're meddling with. It's a new territory for everyone. So that uncertainty comes across when you pay attention.
Like he said, he evolve along with the tech that we've evolved. Since gps became common, people can't read maps, can't find their way amywhere on their own or repeat the trip without the gps. People also don't learn street names etc. With calculators some complex math became available to more people but significantly less people can now do basic math in their head. Spellcheck, grammar check... people's vocabularies have shrunk, the can't use language properly and are ignorant of why it's important. We're about to enter the other side of the bell curve where from our tech advancements.. in fact I think we're already on the downward trajectory. We don't know how to fix the broken corrupted systems we already have. We'll be absolutely reliant on out tech being able to fix our mess for us. We are arrogant and the tendency is to think we are smarter now than people were in the past. I think it is the other way around. We have more collective knowledge at our fingertips but we're dumbing ourselves down. Becoming weaker and more sickly. Lowering mental fortitude. We are our biggest threat.
That was .... something
agree
ChatGPT is the shit, and I still know how to use a Thomas Guide.
@MadHeadzOz Peach brother/ sister/ whatever! Cognitive download is a thing!
Different civilizations were definitely smarter....
loving the way Aliagents is blending AI technology with real world applications
I wonder if people will be watching this in the future to try and figure out what went wrong.
They will look at the comments here and see people like myself raising the alarm and ask why they didn't listen to us. These people will bring the end of humanity.
Yeah from their fallout bunkers.
@@cptn_chromo3189You are not raising an alarm. You are writing a comment, you are doing nothing to help regulate AI or to understand it better. If you are actually afraid, do something, if not, then stop writing youtube comments to help boost your ego. Sorry if I was too harsh
@@karlomolnar2780
This is an open forum for discussion, one of the few left. People voicing concerns over potentially harmful and not fully understood reliance on automation is perfectly acceptable discourse. Let the voices be heard, stop gatekeeping. Especially if they have a valid and justifiable aversion to trusting a future fully dependent on machines and electricity to function society...
@@cptn_chromo3189No, they'll ask why all of you are whining without actually doing anything.
How he looked above his left shoulder and said “what a fascinating idea”, when JR joked around AI government is concerning
Yes, that was creepy.
AI or AOC... what you picking
@@xgtwb6473equally terrifying
Sure beats what the US and some countries have now. I'm all for it, and it's coming, like it or not ❤
Joe didnt poke around....he suggested the damned thing....
I love how many of Joe's "interviews" play out like great conversations between two really good friends who are knowledgeable about what they're talking about. :)
There is such a thing as friendly people, I don't know how old you are but you know friendly is the norm in a lot of parts of the world and used to be, in others. It's called being kindred spirits, you see yourself in everyone, so there's no needing for any coldness or caution.
I sure as hell couldn't see myself in a liberal@@dialatedmcd
@@YOUARESOFT. The irony is in the duality. Reminds me of the old tale of the man with the ant jar. He places red ants and black ants in the same jar and initially they get along in harmony. Then he viciously shakes the jar and watches as the red and black ants attack each other mercilessly. I hope you understand the allegory as it would solve a lot of America's issues.
@@YOUARESOFT.and that's part of the problem nowadays
i know, they are such a pathetic breed i see none of me in that nor would i want to, i can explain in detail if you like@@The1redman2
The fact that he compared it to the development of the Nuclear Missile is kind of scary.
"It seems to me that someday we will have something someday that will somewhat help some people in some of these jobs and there are amazing things than can be done with ai. There are so many things you can do with it and people losing jobs will be bad and is bad because we have a revolution for things and stuff will be different."
-Sam Somebody
Dude sounds exactly like his chatGPT.
Great comment. The best way to argue with these people is to repeat their words back to them, and the absurdity becomes crystal clear.
@@jpieroniIt's a thoughtful answer, which is why many back-seat Barry's don't get it. The beautiful thing is that you cannot bother us or change anything about the work we do in AI. Literally nothing ❤
@bigpickles
Imagine being the bad guy and thinking you're the good guy lol
@@galaxybrainkid1222 imagine being a back-seat Barry who has no idea how LLMs work, have never met Sam, and follow the normie herd. Then again, you probably don't need to imagine, as that's your daily!
@galaxybrainkid1222 No kidding, my thoughts exactly. These guys are so hell bent on advancing technology as fast as humanly possible because they've been convinced that it's the right thing to do that they are totally blind to the fact that they're potentially driving the car of human civilization off of a cliff. Guys like this think they're innovators and revolutionaries but in reality they're just madmen who are no different than guys like Oppenheimer. I just want to go back to the 80s when things were simple. Too much technology is wack. Just look at social media. The rot and decay that's brought onto society and human behavior. It's the elites and guys like this who are gonna push us to the end of days and the end of human civilization, they just try and gaslight us regular folks that we're the problem and they're the saviors. In their eyes we're all just the peasants who don't know what's good for us. To them they're the ones who have all of the answers. They're completely unaware of their own insanity.
His direct correlation of AI to the invention of nuclear weapons, at the end, was a real SKYNET moment.
More like a bluff. GPT4 cant think for itself, it only predicts text based on its training data.
As we already see, corporations get more profit, they keep it for themselves. I am really afraid what will happen to millions of people out of jobs due to AI, and the trillions corporations will gain not paying salaries; health care; heck even vacations and lunch breaks. They will gain even more billions, and it's very unlikely that they will "share the wealth".
Buy their stock then. Most are publicly traded.
They’d have no choice or capitalism would destruct and their monetary gains would be worthless.
@@kaspan5just bc you buy their stock doesn't mean you will share in the profits..boards can vote to give each other raises or distribute the money else where
@@kaspan5horrible take. “just buy their shares” isn’t a solution to a *potential* issue of this magnitude.
Haha yeah, I laughed when he said "Oh we will share billions with the population", yeah right.
the tech behind Aliagents is super interesting, tokenized AI systems with real functionality
This guy is like Tony Hinchcliffe of AI research.
He's way too straight
So he's into BDSM like tony hinchcliffe😂
I'm glad someone else said it bro lol
I love how Joe exactly knows what to ask. I like this man's competence.
Thanks for the great content Joe. Keep up the great work.
Joe is fearless, he'll bring on the most braindead person in the world, n convince alot of subscribers to believe them . A fing genius 👏 😂.
Once this is out of the bottle you can’t stuff it back in. Hold on for a crazy ride. I miss the days of the 1980’s growing up. So simple and enjoyable.