Someday could you explain when to use 이/가 and when to use 는/은 ... still confuses me ㅋㅋㅋㅋ I tend to use ㄴ And on that note, is it also correct to say 가방은 있어요. or 저는 가방을 있어요. (?)
+Nicholas O 이/가 and 는/은 depend on the ending sound... use 이/은 when the final sound in the previous word is a CONSONANT, use 가/는 when the previous word ends in a VOWEL. So N(v)+가/는, and N(c)+이/은. Does that make sense?
Ah yes that part I understand. 강아지는 귀여워요. 강아지가 귀여워요. Like these for example, what's the difference? Can you always switch 이/가 and 는/은? Do they give different feelings? etc etc ㅋㅋㅋ
+esstiel I don't think that is what hes asking. I'm pretty sure he's asking about when to use the topic marker (은/는) versus the subject marker (이/가). When to use 은 or 는 is pretty straight forward (Pick one based on the ending of the word), and same goes for 이 and 가, that's something people can easily learn on their own. But choosing between the topic marker or subject marker for identifying something is different and complicated in it's own right and something that is very difficult for a lot of native speakers to even describe, and even more difficult to correctly understand. I've asked plenty of native speakers about this and they all tell me the same thing "I don't know actually, we just kind of know it because we grew up using it." Even my Korean language teacher had a difficult time giving us all the explanations about it. For example, 이 책은 좋아요 or 이 책이 좋아요. What is the difference in usage here, and how can we apply the usage in other sentences? It also looks like hes confused about 을/를 usage because it's generally used for objects, however an object can also be a topic/subject. To answer his question, 못해요. 미안해요. I don't actually understand it all too well myself, however I will say that using my Korean with native speakers gives me much better insight into it, because they can correct me on my usage. You might experience the same (though they might not be able to tell you why!) Also here is a website that I found a little helpful wiseinit.com/2015/05/18/%EC%9D%80%EB%8A%94topic-marker-vs-%EC%9D%B4%EA%B0%80subject-marker-korean-grammar-vs-grammar-10/ Anyway if that wasn't what he was asking, and he was asking about what you described whoops! I thought what I suggested was what he was asking because it's a common problem when learning Korean.
YES. i/ga and neun/eun give different connotation/nuance to your sentences. i could try to explain it but i'd do a horrible job, so i suggest checking the Talk To Me In korean website (literally talktomeinkorean.com) and look for their level one lesson on i/ga and neun/eun.
using them as a non-native speaker of korean won't necessarily change the literal meaning of your sentences, but it /may/ lead native speakers to infer information differently. especially depending on what part of your sentence you attach the particle to.
감사합니다 ❤
This was useful to me! 감사합니다! I will check out the website too!
thank you for this grammar vid.. it helped me out
The website is nice!
이나 가는 particle 그렇죠. 주격조사 postposition or postpositional particle. 받침있는 단어뒤에는 이, 받침없는 단어뒤에는 가가 붙죠
Yoolim didn't have cigar 유림 cigar 없어요
thankyou :)
날씨가 촣어요 so why do we use 가 after 날씨?
안녕
Someday could you explain when to use 이/가 and when to use 는/은 ... still confuses me ㅋㅋㅋㅋ I tend to use ㄴ
And on that note, is it also correct to say 가방은 있어요. or 저는 가방을 있어요. (?)
+Nicholas O 이/가 and 는/은 depend on the ending sound... use 이/은 when the final sound in the previous word is a CONSONANT, use 가/는 when the previous word ends in a VOWEL. So N(v)+가/는, and N(c)+이/은. Does that make sense?
Ah yes that part I understand.
강아지는 귀여워요.
강아지가 귀여워요.
Like these for example, what's the difference? Can you always switch 이/가 and 는/은? Do they give different feelings? etc etc ㅋㅋㅋ
+esstiel I don't think that is what hes asking. I'm pretty sure he's asking about when to use the topic marker (은/는) versus the subject marker (이/가). When to use 은 or 는 is pretty straight forward (Pick one based on the ending of the word), and same goes for 이 and 가, that's something people can easily learn on their own. But choosing between the topic marker or subject marker for identifying something is different and complicated in it's own right and something that is very difficult for a lot of native speakers to even describe, and even more difficult to correctly understand. I've asked plenty of native speakers about this and they all tell me the same thing "I don't know actually, we just kind of know it because we grew up using it." Even my Korean language teacher had a difficult time giving us all the explanations about it.
For example, 이 책은 좋아요 or 이 책이 좋아요. What is the difference in usage here, and how can we apply the usage in other sentences? It also looks like hes confused about 을/를 usage because it's generally used for objects, however an object can also be a topic/subject.
To answer his question, 못해요. 미안해요. I don't actually understand it all too well myself, however I will say that using my Korean with native speakers gives me much better insight into it, because they can correct me on my usage. You might experience the same (though they might not be able to tell you why!) Also here is a website that I found a little helpful wiseinit.com/2015/05/18/%EC%9D%80%EB%8A%94topic-marker-vs-%EC%9D%B4%EA%B0%80subject-marker-korean-grammar-vs-grammar-10/
Anyway if that wasn't what he was asking, and he was asking about what you described whoops! I thought what I suggested was what he was asking because it's a common problem when learning Korean.
YES. i/ga and neun/eun give different connotation/nuance to your sentences. i could try to explain it but i'd do a horrible job, so i suggest checking the Talk To Me In korean website (literally talktomeinkorean.com) and look for their level one lesson on i/ga and neun/eun.
using them as a non-native speaker of korean won't necessarily change the literal meaning of your sentences, but it /may/ lead native speakers to infer information differently. especially depending on what part of your sentence you attach the particle to.
가방이 없는데
zilola tursunova 가방이 았어요
😂😂😂😂