Prince William was so beautiful. And so tragic how he died age 30. But Richard, the younger son, has done well. I love that he's the patron of the Richard III Society, something like that. Richard III had the same title, Duke of Gloucester, before he was King.
@@josephallwood5070 , Parliament declared the princes and their siblings to be illegitimate, so the crown went to Richard as the next in line. He didn’t just decide to be king; Parliament said that he was. So he had no need to kill his nephews.
The duke of Gloucester was the image of my late brother in law. He look so relaxed compared to his brothers although a cigarette is constantly in his hand. His son, Prince William was gorgeous. I just watched a video of him.
Being the next eldest brother of George VI, the Duke of Gloucester was third in line to the throne during the war years and his little son, Prince William, fourth in line.
R. Crompton and it should be remembered that this adorable little prince William was later killed so tragically at the age of 30 in an airshow crash. He was a special young man in his short time, marched to the beat of his own drum, and tried very hard to separate himself from Royal life and make his way in the world on his own merits. So sad seeing him as a carefree little toddler here.
R. Crompton : An interesting fact that is very often overlooked is that the Duke of Gloucester was designated Prince Regent to Princess Elizabeth (current Queen) should serious illness or death happened to his brother King George VI before Elizabeth had reached the age of 21.
Katheryne Koelker : You maybe right, I was going on the assumption that the age of consent then was 21 and you were then classed as an adult! I wasn’t allowed to vote until I was 21 and that was the late 60’s!
Probably the royal family decided to kill him for going back to zsuzsi and created the plain accident the way they did the car accident for princess Diana and dudi when they decided to get marry!
The report of his plane crash is online, it clearly shows pilot error. He was the 9th in line to the throne, why would he be a target? Politicians would be more so targets of any kind of conspiracy rather than royals who do nothing but wave to the public and cut ribbons nowadays
@@arazumiran5378 Yeah the Royal family made her call the paparazzi on herself, made her get into a car with a drunk driver and prevented her from wearing a seatbelt. She died because she made stupid choices, it’s not a conspiracy, you mo ron.
@@mscott3918, Such a privilege. My Aries partner is born the same day as James Scott 1st Duke of Monmouth who would have been a good Protestant King and Britain would have seen a direct lineage of Kings to the present day if King Charles ll didn't have Catholic sympathies and saw to it that his Catholic brother James take the throne who then brutally had Lord Monmouth s head taken off. An unforgivable act. There is no proof at all that Charles didn't marry Lucy Walters, he carried some secrets. Charles French mother was Catholic and this was why he was in awe of the Catholic faith. Charles ll was a Gemini, typically this way and that. Reigned as a Protestant and died a Catholic on his death bed. James ll lost and his Protestant daughter Mary was a lovely Queen but the throne should have rightfully gone to Lord Monmouth.
It was genetic luck. William was quite the looker compared to the other males in the royal family. Richard came out how you'd expect their children to look. With William it was some kind of genetic miracle. Even his uncle, Prince George, Duke of Kent, who was revered as being a looker in his day had nothing on William. He was very good-looking, especially for a royal. They're a strange looking bunch.
@@graphiteandglitter The Queen was always attractive, I thought. You'd think that their children would be a lot better looking. I don't understand how the two of them put together resulted in Prince Charles. 😫
my god, everone down in comments must be atleast over the age of 70. I'm super bored because of the stupid quarantine and somehow found myself looking up the BRF tree and was curious to see all these people that we never hear about who are still alive. apparently this must be the current duke of G's father? no idea who this william they keep talking about is
Prince William was so beautiful. And so tragic how he died age 30. But Richard, the younger son, has done well. I love that he's the patron of the Richard III Society, something like that. Richard III had the same title, Duke of Gloucester, before he was King.
Watch something about Richard III...killed his own nephews to take the throne...quite a guy.
@@josephallwood5070 , Parliament declared the princes and their siblings to be illegitimate, so the crown went to Richard as the next in line. He didn’t just decide to be king; Parliament said that he was. So he had no need to kill his nephews.
@Lori Jones, I like the present Duke of Gloucester as well, and I too like that he’s involved in the RIII Society. 👑😊
Prince William should have been on British vogue!
The duke of Gloucester was the image of my late brother in law. He look so relaxed compared to his brothers although a cigarette is constantly in his hand. His son, Prince William was gorgeous. I just watched a video of him.
Prince William was so cute as a baby and grew up to be a handsome man. He was gone too soon. Such a loss.
Very interesting - I saw rhe Duke and Duchess in Australia as a child.
He was so cute since he was a bb. His parents were good looking too. His mos was beautiful
William got the best of his parents features
He must have made his parents proud.
Prince William before my time
Being the next eldest brother of George VI, the Duke of Gloucester was third
in line to the throne during the war years and his little son, Prince William,
fourth in line.
R. Crompton and it should be remembered that this adorable little prince William was later killed so tragically at the age of 30 in an airshow crash. He was a special young man in his short time, marched to the beat of his own drum, and tried very hard to separate himself from Royal life and make his way in the world on his own merits. So sad seeing him as a carefree little toddler here.
R. Crompton : An interesting fact that is very often overlooked is that the Duke of Gloucester was designated Prince Regent to Princess Elizabeth (current Queen) should serious illness or death happened to his brother King George VI before Elizabeth had reached the age of 21.
@@stratac30 Yes--the Duke was to remain in England till Elizabeth reached her majority (I thought that was age 18, not 21).
Katheryne Koelker : You maybe right, I was going on the assumption that the age of consent then was 21 and you were then classed as an adult! I wasn’t allowed to vote until I was 21 and that was the late 60’s!
ns2110theonly fr
Love the duchess of Gloucester and her husband amazing kind people
Thank God the royal wave was changed @2:35 . That was a very strange wave.
livelove &laugh the Duchess was not royal, she was the daughter of a Duke
same i feel uncomfortable with her wave🤣🤣
It was! Looked like quite a lot of effort for a wave, too.
He was my Godfather
Do you think King Charles II really did marry Lucy Walters ?
Very nice!!
Awesome I love reading and watching documentaries of the duke...
Wow. Did you know his son William?
@@Sophie_kent No I only met his brother
Why did they seal the records of his plane crash for 100 years??? Makes me wonder what really happened to that plane? He was an experienced pilot.
Probably the royal family decided to kill him for going back to zsuzsi and created the plain accident the way they did the car accident for princess Diana and dudi when they decided to get marry!
@@arazumiran5378 Don't blame everything on royals, you are a really big idiot blinded by your blindness
The report of his plane crash is online, it clearly shows pilot error. He was the 9th in line to the throne, why would he be a target? Politicians would be more so targets of any kind of conspiracy rather than royals who do nothing but wave to the public and cut ribbons nowadays
@@arazumiran5378 Don't be so ridiculous and melodramatic.
@@arazumiran5378 Yeah the Royal family made her call the paparazzi on herself, made her get into a car with a drunk driver and prevented her from wearing a seatbelt. She died because she made stupid choices, it’s not a conspiracy, you mo ron.
He should of been on British vogue
I love the BRF
what if
Long live The Buccleuch's; The true heirs to The British Throne.
As a member of the Montagu Douglas Scott family, thank you.
@@mscott3918, Such a privilege. My Aries partner is born the same day as James Scott 1st Duke of Monmouth who would have been a good Protestant King and Britain would have seen a direct lineage of Kings to the present day if King Charles ll didn't have Catholic sympathies and saw to it that his Catholic brother James take the throne who then brutally had Lord Monmouth s head taken off. An unforgivable act. There is no proof at all that Charles didn't marry Lucy Walters, he carried some secrets. Charles French mother was Catholic and this was why he was in awe of the Catholic faith. Charles ll was a Gemini, typically this way and that. Reigned as a Protestant and died a Catholic on his death bed. James ll lost and his Protestant daughter Mary was a lovely Queen but the throne should have rightfully gone to Lord Monmouth.
Bonnie Magpie not true, the first Duke was illegitimate so that rules them out
@@bonniemagpie9960 but the first Duke was illegitimate so that rules his line out completely
@@lsmith9249 ; Can you provide proof King Charles II didn't marry Lucy Walters ?
Thank God this fawning deference is long past. Perfectly lovely people of course!
William got the best features from his parents , Richard took the worst
It was genetic luck. William was quite the looker compared to the other males in the royal family. Richard came out how you'd expect their children to look. With William it was some kind of genetic miracle. Even his uncle, Prince George, Duke of Kent, who was revered as being a looker in his day had nothing on William. He was very good-looking, especially for a royal. They're a strange looking bunch.
@@positivepessimist6853 Queen Alexandra and Prince Philip were good looking people, but God knows where their genes went.....
@@graphiteandglitter The Queen was always attractive, I thought. You'd think that their children would be a lot better looking. I don't understand how the two of them put together resulted in Prince Charles. 😫
@@positivepessimist6853 the Lord moves in mysterious ways 😁
@@graphiteandglitter 😂😂😂
my god, everone down in comments must be atleast over the age of 70. I'm super bored because of the stupid quarantine and somehow found myself looking up the BRF tree and was curious to see all these people that we never hear about who are still alive. apparently this must be the current duke of G's father? no idea who this william they keep talking about is
RockyCycle the current Duke of Gloucester only inherited the title because his elder brother William was killed in the 1970s in a plane crash
William was stunning , rare thing to see , it’s ageless and maybe you can learn something
Oh how the aborigines have change...smh