I prefer this voice and style of documentaries to the recent style of documentaries where they spend half the show showing us inane details about the personal lives of scientists and them getting excited and speak in their own tone of voices. I prefer information packed, clearly narrated documentaries like this one.
It's there, in brief. The projected view of tectonic plate movements into Earth's ~1000 year future was shown at about the 30 minute mark. It's likely impossible to predict Earth's climate that far in the future.
Well if you believe in capitalism, the only thing left to do is stop using the service and using a competitor. Complaining is not part of the deal and is counterproductive.
David Frigault Maybe they should stop making ridiculous layout changes then and actualy make content more accessible for viewers. Like say, page numbers on a channel? or am i the only one who hates the load more button with a passion. Most of the updates youtube has done, have not been well received by the content creators and viewers. They're wasting more money by themselves, then the % of people who use adblock.
18:00 to 18:20 Ice is not lost, it is converted to water and water-vapor and redistributed and re-frozen. Point for Milankovitch Cycle reference, however.
ryderxiv precisely , most of the times i listen to quantum physics , antimatter stuff , black holes and other things that is beyond my brain capacity . my brain just can’t handle too much info ,it crashes and just shut down by itself .😂
Thats exactly how Connor MaCleod felt in Highlander until he became practically suicidal but then won "the prize" by defeating the mighty Kurgen...being immortal is a curse.
Why doesn't the sea level rise every summer when we loose a good portion of sea ice. Not to mention the gravitational pull at the equator. I would think at least around the equator sea levels would be higher during summer months but try to find it on the web. Good luck
which is faster, melting of ice or freezing of water? Since Nibiru went by, moving our poles and the equator, we have only had a summer. Wait until winter arrives.
The direct effect of pollution over the melting is the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere which increases the global temperature. They mentioned it, the "industrial age" is basically the point where because of industry the world began polluting the atmosphere with CO2 along with other shit. The increase of CO2 amounts because of pollution is one of the causes, which is why an international law has been adopted that gives each country a limit of how much CO2 they can produce in a year. Many countries that have a small developed industry can actually sell the rights to another country to pollute on their account. But as the video says, beside the pollution there are other causes as well, the pollution being the only one we can directly influence though.
thats were the debate lies, no one is arguing that climate is changing, but the cause of it is very uncertain and hottly debated, yes co2 does have an effect but how much is unknown
the Al and Gretta cash show, send them money President Trump has cut them off, so if you are A Dummocratt empty your 401k give it to the Al and Gretta show, so they will support our fraud on the public! Please stop the Propaganda we are very tired of it! Less than 1/2" if that in 100 years!
Human activity is not the only cause for climate change, it's just the only thing we can do anything about. Whatever we can do may only buy us a little time. Probably not a lot of time. Great work on your video.
gommtu What are you talking about? I am just saying this video doesn't talk about the future of our planet much... It spent the last few minutes talking about the future... it should be renamed that's all.
unbreakable footage I agree. But this documentary IS about the past - it should be named accordingly. I already know about the past, now I am interested in learning about the future predictions of how the past will impact the future :) finding a video focused on the future is difficult if the ones about the past have a name like, "Earth in 1000 years" :/
Scientific consensus on global warming for which humans are responsible: - National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - The Royal Society of the UK (RS) - Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS) - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ... and many more.
It's happened before and the biosphere will recover. It saddens me how many unique lifeforms global warming, pollution, and human expansion will kill off.
the Al and Gretta cash show, send them money President Trump has cut them off, so if you are A Dummocratt empty your 401k give it to the Al and Gretta show, so they will support our fraud on the public! Please stop the Propaganda we are very tired of it! Less than 1/2" if that in 100 years!
@@johnwest3287 Well, Al Gore, who warned us all about the oceans rising........went on and bought a 9 mill mansion on the beach in Florida. But we should sell. Cheap, preferably.
Yes we must understand that change is what our Planet will continue doing. Life won't be easy which is why we're suppose to love everyone including those who don't treat us respectful. This is why I believe in God and Jesus Christ.
@y2knoproblem. No actually the climate of the last 22,000 years has been explained in detail, but you never read it! Did you expect someone would deliver the story directly to you? At any rate here is what you don't understand about the climate for the last 22,000 years. 22,000 years the earth was still deep in an ice age especially in the northern hemisphere. The glaciers did not even begin to retreat from that latest of glacial periods until about 3,000 years later. By 10,000 years ago most the ice had retreated to the Arctic. The Milankovitch cycles returned to a pattern closer to today's and because of warming of the oceans CO2 was released back into the atmosphere which amplified the warming started by the change in the Milankovich cycles. CO2 returned to a level of 270 ppm where it remained stable until the start of the industrial age when it began to rise. CO2 has gradually increased since then and starting about 1900 began cause slight warming in the climate. This was not apparent until about 1980 and since then the warming has been a steady upward trend as CO2 continues to rise.
Great explanation! I hope s/he reads it1 The warming and cooling cycles of the earth are tens of thousands of years long, not a few years long. One extra hot summer doesn't mean the earth is warming. One extra cold winter doesn't mean the earth is cooling. An occasional year of bad hurricanes doesn't mean anything about the long cycle.
@Southeastern777 Your explanation needs some help so how about this? During the ice ages CO2 did follow temperature. When it started to cool BECAUSE the Milankovitch Cycles reduced the sun light reaching the earth the oceans also began to cool. This allowed the oceans to naturally absorb CO2 from the atmosphere which amplified the cooling. And when the M Cycles changed and allowed more sunlight to reach the earth the oceans began to warm and the CO2 was returned to the atmosphere to AMPLIFY the warming. But this is not what is going on now. WE humans are the ones adding CO2 to the atmosphere which in turn is forcing CO2 into the oceans. That CO2 in turn changes to carbonic acid and bicarbonate. Over time like, decades, temperatures increase depending on how fast CO2 is added to the atmosphere. The heat increase in the atmosphere is also adding heat to the oceans warming the oceans. It is true that water vapor is a stronger green house gas, but it doesn't raise temperatures by itself because if it did we would see a viscious cycle of ever increasing temperatures as when temperatures rise the atmosphere holds more moisture causing temps to rise again and so on. THAT is NOT what we are seeing. Water vapor is a feed back. It is the GHG's of CO2 and methane increasing which actually lead to an increase in warming with water vapor enhancing the warmth by increasing humidity. Ever notice how 90 degrees F FEELS much warmer at 90 % humidity then 90 degrees at 0 % humidity?? That's the effect of water vapor at higher concentrations. The temperature is still 90 degrees, but it FEELS warmer. This is all thoroughly explained at realclimate.org
I remember that. I'm still laughing. Instead we had about 15 years of few hurricanes. They can't tell you if it's going to rain in 4 hours. I don't trust their projections for 20 years from now.
@Southeastern777 Says who? I've never heard any serious scientist call it a religion. A few selling something, maybe, but you get some charlatans in every group.
Hmmm- the arctic ice rebounded in 2103- I have heard that there was more ice coverage in 2014 than in recent history, since we have been monitoring. What was it like in 2015 and 2016?
Considering how much energy it would take to melt 1,555,574 cubic miles of ice (from Greenland), I think rising sea levels might be the least of our problems.
Not necessarily. The climate will become more dry, which will decrease food production. In areas like northern Europe, changing sea currents will bring down temperatures radically. Coastal areas with both urban and agricultural populations will be lost, causing demographic upheavals. Any benefits from CO2 increase will be short-term, followed by severe drawbacks in the long term.
Per Eskelund human created??? Did you watch the video?? Temp increase of 1C in the whole of the industrial revolution. Carbon levels in the atmosphere are only 1/3 of what they were pre last ice age. What exactly do you think we could do to have an affect on the whole planet?? Nothing, that is what. Everything is cycles, there have been many nice ages before, and many warnings. How do you explain them?? But yet, “this” specific warming. (Of only 1C) is so crazy and Bad?? If humans think they are the cause of the weather then they seriously need to check their egos! Lol. We are a little blip.
@@iknowyoureright8564 Sorry. I'm from Norway and trusted google translate. It should have been "man-made climate change". My mistake. But apart from the fact that the increase in temperature is closer to 1.5 degrees C, than 1, you elegantly fail to mention that the increase in temperature has occurred over the last 100 of the 200( give or take a few) years since the industrial revulsion occurred. In the first hundred, it was more or less stable.
Great video! Looks like we have nothing to worry about regarding global warming. A one point it said that ocean level would only rise 1 meter by 2100. No problem. Makes me wonder why people get so worked up.
***** The humans have only had this desturctive knowledge for about 70 years and look what they have done up to now, last another 1000 years I very much doubt it.
rick petch What have we done with it? Let's see... The basics of it have gotten us up to space... We've created a new superweapon... And, oh, I almost forgot - the most powerful way of making energy available to us technologically!
And poisoning the world while you are making it, what good is going to space doing for the Earth, and super weapons for killing with that dare not be used because of the radiation it spreads around the Earth, plus what do you do with the spent radioactive rods, bury them in the Earth till they start leaking out of their containers, Yes we have done a lot to look after the Earth haven't we, Everything the yanks make is for killing with, You must be a very frightened lot you yanks.
rick petch You'll have to get over the fact that we're human. This rock is screwed. I suggest you take up the same stance and look for a way out. We can take care of planets when we have the necessary technology to do so without greatly impacting the budget or energy output.
Me, no way I am nearly at the end of my time on this planet, age is catching up with me fast, It's up to you young ones to do something about it, Good luck to you.
Take ya pill your almost there anyway don't let the erectile disfunction get you down there are plenty of golden girls up at the bingo hall maybe you can get one of them to come over and put a puzzle together and talk about back in my day sunny boy.
7 metres of sea level rise would not happen overnight so there would be ample time to move or build up the land to compensate. 1000 ppm of CO2 is ideal for photosynthesis so not something to be fearful of.
The ice loss in West Antartica, despite 2014 being a record year for ice formation for the whole continent, has been found to be caused by volcanic vents under the ice.
Don't mind them. You have every right to express your own beliefs. I don't agree with you on this one but I do appreciate your courage to speak your mind here, exposing yourself to predictably hostile replies.
Evolution is a way to explain why there's such an astounding amount of different normal organisms, strange organisms indifferent to the human species, and organisms causing sickness and death in humans. The vast number of species, and their fantastic variety yet all joined together by their common DNA, places humans as one species of millions, with common heritage from ancient times. If a god made all the organisms, he also made the tiny, insentient organisms that cause sickness and death in the species he's most interested in, the species who prays to their god and praises their god. Unlike evolution, which has an explanation for this, religious conjecture can only suggest unlikely scenarios for why human sickness and death is necessary and afflicts believers as much as non-believers. Until religion comes up with something resembling a theory, the Theory of Evolution is the best theory of life's origin. Potentially, a more refined scientific theory may come along that explains it even better, but faith in a better religious one appearing is misplaced.
Only God knows who created plants and animals, haha! Anyway, actually one can laugh about religious people, but before anyone does that, try to prove it wasn't God. I bet you are not going to succeed!
... So... Antarctica is a complete separate continent on its own? Not just a huge ice sheet? Good lord... there's probably diamonds... oil... and other rare resources there...
Bob Bobson I mean it would make sense... you find resources on a continent... unless it's just a huge ass sheet of ice. In which case then never mind. But if there's like, rock, and soil and other things like that under the snow and ice, then there's more than likely an entire continent of resources we can take advantage of if we could get over bitter cold. B l
+Dave Strider (Future) its mainly just a continental glacier, so we can find minerals but it'd be extremely expensive and hard to get oil from it through all of the ice, wind and so on. so yes, there are resources, but it's probably easier to steal them from other countires
Not only did this video not show the Earth in 1000 years, but it didn't even go into much depth. It would have been nice to see impacts of rising climates on ecosystems and extreme weather. Instead we got the narrator telling us that the melting ice will heighten water levels over and over.
Couldn't the 1 degree Celsius difference be explained by things like better measurement methods, more measurements in previously uncharted tropical areas and possibly even more people living, hence measuring in various environments?
No, you are making a bunch of incorrect assumptions about how the conclusion was reached. Instead of making assumption about how scientists do their work, why not read their research articles and cast your assumptions aside.
It is more likely that climate change will end in a mini-ice age due to warming and the resultant freshening of the North Atlantic ... stalling the Gulf Stream. Will that happen in the lifetime of those presently breathing? Who knows? My point is, the increase in greenhouse gasses since the industrial revolution, which unquestionably is increasing average global temperatures ... could, indeed, lead to a global cooling. Fact is, the global climate is too complex to say. But, there is absolutely no question that the climate is changing. Which is precisely why "global warming" is not really an accurate description of what's going on. If you're fairly young, say 30something ... with a normal lifespan ... you will witness the dislocation of hundreds of millions of coastal residents. Not to mention further wars waged for resources. Not just crude oil, but also water and food.
Nuno Pestana Bravo to Portugal for your forward thinking with regard to non-fossil energy sources. The USA has a long way to go to catch up. Sadly, lots of big money interests aren't so far sighted. I'm kind of surprised at your assessment of Portugal's health care system, even though I'm sure you know of which you speak. Just surprising it isn't better than the USA's system... although Obamacare does show promise. Here's hoping the flat-Earthers don't inflict too much damage on it. As it is now, the USA has the best health care money can buy. Rich people from all over the world come here for treatment of serious illnesses. But, if you're not rich you're kind of screwed here in the good ol' USA. And most of us aren't rich.
28:50 If CO2 returns to pre-industrial levels, then the Milankovich cycles of climate change can take over and return us to glacial conditions. Then, we won't have to worry about sea level rise. We will have to contend with our northern cities being buried by a mile or more of ice sheet! Climate change happens! Warming is better! It means more rain, more plant growth, more life!
Warming is not "Better" if it causes record droughts (Texas in the 1950's, Colorado in the 1990's, Australia at this point). Texas: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950s_Texas_drought Colorado droughts: ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/pdfs/ahistoryofdrought.pdf Australia: time.com/longform/australia-drought-photos/
I think we will be living on earth for a very long time before we inhabit another planet, simply because it is far far easier to sustain the livability on our planet than to establish livability on another one. The effects of low g and atmospheric inconsistencies on other planets alone would take a very long time to deal with compared with altering our own climate which is already relatively fine tuned for our survival regardless of its fluctuations.
iamihop Everyone is an expert on the interent, didn't you know? Yes, i'm sure he has a PhD in Geological Science, where as I have a PhD in Oceanography.
iamihop Yes well because it's SO hard to find a link these days. Everything is credible on the internet, didn't you know? www.ocean.washington.edu/home/Marta+Wolfshorndl *Wolf*shorndl #ThisIsTheInternetLOL
Yes, if we don't surrender our freedoms to sociopaths that are obsessed with power then we will all parish from global destruction. Hurry! Time is running out! Don't question it, just react or die!
@@hotcoffee7933 couldn't have said it any better. "What's the hold up folks, get in line and Obey to save your kids and yourselves!!! No time to question!!!!" F 'ing cult of parrots and sheeple dreaming they are the only awake ones.
Cant predict the weather for the week but can predict what earth will look like in 1000 years okay until they can predict the weather correctly for a year I don't believe any theory's about the future.
I realize I'm replaying to someone named "MrTrollingisepic," but in the event you are being genuine, it is important to realize there is a difference in Weather and Climate. What you are talking about is weather, and difficulty in measuring and predicting specific meteorological events. (Whether or not it will rain today, or if it will only be cloudy/sunny, etc.) This video deals with a much broader view of things, in which they make predictions about CLIMATE, and the changes that would happen to it based on very real, measurable variables such as Milankovitch cycles, ocean current disruption, etc.
When the ice melts and sea levels rise, beachfront properties will fall into the ocean. A lot of them will be rich people's houses, and they will predictably blame everyone else.
I see so many ppl talking about the last 10-20 years. This is a big planet, and if we inflickted so mutch changes that we see a big diffrents in so sort time, we whould be dead whitin 200 years. this time scale is mutch bigger. but the things is that we alone cant do it, in the best we just help it along. just think about all the co2 that are in the ice. But non the less. this is doomed to happen whitout us or not. better to find way to adapt then to try and stop the cycle of our dear planet;)
Apart from agreeing with you, I find your comment quite fascinating because of how you've spelt some of the words. Obviously, English is not your first language, but your gist is a good use of the language, and very comprehensible. Stay well, wherever you are...;-)
LOL... It's neat to be able to see this stuff. I am an explorer of sorts. Lately there has been good science and bad science and you just don't know who to trust. As far as knowing what is about to happen is concerned they can't even predict tomorrow's weather any more. So if it doesn't directly affect me I really have no interest. What get's my goat is people who are lying, using bad science to do so and collecting money because of it. They all should be shot, burned and then drug through the streets to be pissed on.
Considering the fact that our human ancestors have existed 400,000 years ago, I'm pretty confident that human beings will survive for a very long time. Maybe not everyone, maybe not even a whole lot, but it's been found that most males today contain a chromosome that date way back to one common ancestor and the same for a female who dates back to around 250,000 years ago or so... That's a very long time and I'm sure in the next 200 years human beings are going to advance to a whole other degree. Some freak genius will come up with a freak idea or we might even succeed in making Mars our new home. You can never tell, but human beings have proved to be very persistent as a species.
I too think humans will live a long time, but we as a species are really young. 400,000 is not a long time, geologically or evolutionary speaking. Besides that, 400,000 years is the extreme guess, most scientists think we are more like 200,000 years old IIRC
sander395 indeed but if you really look at it, how can humans possibly die out? Meteors? Nuclear disaster? Humans will always survive because we are like the shit stains under your shoe, we'll dissapear for 99% but always rise again. it would take a major nastural disaster that wipes out almost all life on earth to get rid off humans. Once the food is again we're next.
400,000 years is a drop in the bucket of geological or evolutionary time. If your particular 400,000 years happens (unlikely, of course) to end tomorrow, then that ends that. Extrapolations into the future, linear or otherwise, are not very smart because the future is one thing about which we don't know shit. Humans may survive and humans may not, but most species once rampant are no longer with us. Where did we get the idea that maybe we are the end all and be all of evolution, the coveted lovely apply of God's eye, in a manner of speaking. Arguments about what or whether humans will survive are like arguments about what the color will be of the next car you meet. Extrapolation get abused the same way statistics does. I wish our educational system delivered a few of the basics, but it doesn't, really.
Larry Sherk I did not mean that humans would live forever. If you read what I said, I said'a long time' .True. I wish the 'education system' delivered better... Better patience and discipline before ranting on misunderstandings.
This video gets points for solar driven climate change per the Milankovitch cycle, how ocean ice sheets melt (very good) and how land ice is held back. It gets a few demerits for not explaining how land ice sheets actually retreat, since it reflects solar energy, plus how 4/100 of 1% of CO-2 can make any difference at all?
Final proof that Earth will prevail, having cast off its human vermin & keeping her best. We'll all be long gone and the planet will remain renewed. We all ask: " When will it end?" The answer is simple: WE end...
@Amy Xoxo Pretty sure that causing a mass extinction would mean humans are WORSE than vermin. www.independent.co.uk/environment/mass-extinction-humans-causing-earth-deaths-end-times-warning-a7765856.html
I bet you if we brought all the best scientists together we would probably discover some crazy shit. I mean look at the Nazis by working together they made a rocket and the nuke which shows just how efficient we can be by working together.
However, the environment is not going to be a issue in the future we will probably build something to sustain or rebuild our environment like a filter on massive scale.
Man-made climate change denial was best explained by George Carlin: "Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that."
Angus Davies nobody denies it?saying “climate change denial” is just a way to discredit any who questions the solution, Once these a realistic and doable solution Most will be all for it.what do U think” these people “are going to do to combat it? Or should we just throw money at something cause it makes us feel better.? How bout I’ll drive ur goofy lil car and u guys pay for it and the rest of us will pay ya back when it works.?
Angus Davies, How about we in the North sell you some Ice bergs, and global freezing. Then you'd not need or think to worry about it. Should those in the Tundra Zones or to 60º latitude really run around telling people to be concerned about warming tempretures when day time tempretures only rise above freezing briefly in June?
"..some people are really fucking stupid. Did you ever notice that? How many stupid people there are? God damn, theres a lot of dumb bastards walking around.." 😁
Carbon dioxide is only .04% of our atmosphere. 95% of greenhouse gases is water vapor. The reason why scientists say that CO2 is a problem is because even if it "warms" the earth only a little bit, this causes more water vapor in the air and an increase in temperatures. They don't know how much CO2 actually increases temperature by itself however the thinking is if the level of CO2 increases temperature by 1 degree Celsius, then the water vapor increase created by that warming would in turn raise the temperature another degree or two. What they fail to tell everyone is that the CO2 level has been much higher in earth's history and life thrived. They also fail to inform people that we are at the tail end of an interglacial and it is supposed to be warming up. The ice is supposed to melt which in turn allows the ground to absorb more heat making the earth warmer. This will also increase water vapor levels and help warm the earth. Whatever the case, the ice age is going to return soon (few thousand years or less). What raises my attention is that CO2 is the only gas that the government can tax. This is too much of a coincidence for me to dismiss. They seem more sure about global warming than Biologists are about Evolution. This surprises me because in regards to temperature increases, there could be hundreds or even thousands of variables that go into temperature fluctuations. Possibly millions. To look at CO2, nod your and act so sure that it is the culprit of temperature increase is phenomenal. Another thing to ask is how much of the CO2 increase being noticed is because of deforestation? We know that solid forest used to extend from the Mississippi river all the way to the East Coast of the United States. The same story is played out all over the world with the Amazon seeing terrible losses in forest. In the Northern Hemisphere we see oscillations in CO2 levels between the winter and summer. This is because in the winter, plants die or go dormant (increasing CO2 levels). The summer months bring life back to the vegetation (decreasing CO2 levels). If for instance we do away with forests and vegetation then one would expect that CO2 levels would not fall as much in the summer. However we would still see the increase in CO2 levels in the winter. This new oscillation that when plotted on a graph, would show a yearly increase in CO2.
Josh Ferr The main point isn't that temperatures were higher in the past it's that they've never changed this fast without ecosystems collapsing. There are several positive feed back loops that would be triggered by a rapidly changing carbon level. Also, a small percentage of carbon doesn't mean it's effect will be small. That all depends on the physics of carbon molecules.
@@darthdonkulous1810 You are some dumb and stupid beyond belief. I guess you think the thousands of climate scientists who have all come to the same conclusion are all in a big conspiracy to make people pay Carbon tax which you have all been paying for nearly 10 yrs now and didn't even notice...lol
I would have strongly supported the "rift-valley" hypothesis of C.A. Campbell III, instead of the one presented here being that it's simply "a central drainage canyon" based only on the nice looking animation. Further, if all that ice melted relieving the mantle and that "canyon" went from being a mile below sea-level to one mile above sea-level, then certainly the surrounding region elsewhere would sink a mile or so, perhaps rapidly (in relative terms). An inundation of catastrophe covering thousands of square miles perhaps as far as New England. One can hope.
@@hedf a few months ago they found out they were faking numbers .. to get their agenda right.. it is all BS.. the trial riders i ride with are more informed than you are..
Yeah climate models. You have to take satellite and weather data and run it in a supercomputer with 1000's of smart people who know about maths and chemistry and physics every hour. sometimes you run them for months, sometimes a year and then you recalibrate. It's tough science. Super hard to predict the future. But most of the climate models are actually spot on. 1.1C now, 1.5 by 2025. 2.4C by 2035. And regrettably 5C by 2100. We have failed to appreciate feedbacks. www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/modelling-systems/new-flagship-climate-models
I wont be to sure about that, we have already seen the effects of a nuclear bomb, I I dont think we would want to see that happen on a mass scale so will do our best to not randomly start firing nuclear missiles all other the planet.
Raquayza L'Gendary Honestly, I try. but it fades further and further everyday as our governments wage war. I do have a bit of faith for our species, but not for the men that control us.
![[Limbus Company - PV] Chapter.7 - Oblivion](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VUpkXPkvoxU/mqdefault.jpg)
I've grown addicted to these documentaries. It helps me fall to sleep at night as well
I prefer this voice and style of documentaries to the recent style of documentaries where they spend half the show showing us inane details about the personal lives of scientists and them getting excited and speak in their own tone of voices. I prefer information packed, clearly narrated documentaries like this one.
What I would give to glimpse 1 million years into the past and 1 million years into the future...
Then again.
It possible looks the same
@@ingrid1001 I doubt it, but it would be exciting. Maybe after this life I can.
Watched the whole video, waited for the "Earth in 1000 Years" bit.... they forgot to throw that in.
It's there, in brief. The projected view of tectonic plate movements into Earth's ~1000 year future was shown at about the 30 minute mark. It's likely impossible to predict Earth's climate that far in the future.
It’s more of a implied thing. It’s going to freeze and thaw again
Well ya know it's propaganda! They pushed out the point so anything after would be a waste of money!
@Jennifer 6strings Awesome. Keep it real 🤽
2 min in
I hate that youtube now puts so much video advertising into long videos, I remember youtube back before it had video ads.
Well if you believe in capitalism, the only thing left to do is stop using the service and using a competitor. Complaining is not part of the deal and is counterproductive.
use an add blocker and go back to the good old days :)
David Frigault Maybe they should stop making ridiculous layout changes then and actualy make content more accessible for viewers. Like say, page numbers on a channel? or am i the only one who hates the load more button with a passion. Most of the updates youtube has done, have not been well received by the content creators and viewers. They're wasting more money by themselves, then the % of people who use adblock.
hey buddy... go get a thing called ADBLOCK, for google chrome or firefox. You will never see an ad again :) You're welcome in advance!
install adblock plus ;)
For 2013, this is a VERY well researched, solidly scientific video: no alarmism, no political nonsense, no pulling punches. Thanks a lot for posting!!
The tittle of this documentary should be "The Ice Caps And How They Are Changing"
Or more like "How we learned from Dr. Joseph Goebbles.
18:00 to 18:20 Ice is not lost, it is converted to water and water-vapor and redistributed and re-frozen. Point for Milankovitch Cycle reference, however.
You look like Charlie Brooker.
Thanks for so much comprehensible details which often get glossed over.
I can't wait for this, I'm gonna check the vid again on 11-03-3014!
thats in a few days
Gangnster Mudkipz there are many different ways to order the date...
Gangnster Mudkipz Do you even time travel bro?
freeze yourself and before that put a note on you"don't melt before 11-03-3014''
Good luck buddy
they say by 2067,humans,will have one big ass cheek instead of 2
This is the perfect video for sleeping
***** it's that dude's voice..I agree. I nominate the new narrator to be someone like Christopher Walken, Queen Latifah, or Rachel Ray.
i actually agree....
Zzzzzzzzz............ Oh, wait! where's that Bruce Macabee video? (shit, I got to be at work in three hours, I'm gonna be dead :P)
It’s probably because your little brain can’t concentrate on the depth of what is being said.
ryderxiv precisely , most of the times i listen to quantum physics , antimatter stuff , black holes and other things that is beyond my brain capacity . my brain just can’t handle too much info ,it crashes and just shut down by itself .😂
Earth in 1000 years, more like weather patterns in 1000 years.
Our legacy as mankind will last for millions of years
Or not.
If all humanity dies out the only sign of life in millions of years will be the president's heads in America.. that's our legacy🙄
I wish I was immortal and could observe this in real time for eternity.
Become an ice core sample
you'd quickly regret that and go crazy
You don't want to live for eternity and see the universe dilute into nothingness.
You'd be bored as hell
Thats exactly how Connor MaCleod felt in Highlander until he became practically suicidal but then won "the prize" by defeating the mighty Kurgen...being immortal is a curse.
Fascinating documentary.There is still time to save our planet.
"Earth in 993 Years"
I was here 2020
I clicked on this video just to post this comment but you beat me to it haha
earth in 1 year we all babies
Underrated
992 years and counting...
looked at comments expecting to see the armchair scientists comments, what a wealth of valuable information.
Thank you for my service
@@davidpjr8 noice
Why doesn't the sea level rise every summer when we loose a good portion of sea ice. Not to mention the gravitational pull at the equator. I would think at least around the equator sea levels would be higher during summer months but try to find it on the web. Good luck
I think it has something to do with the different hemispheric climates and the shear volume of the ocean.
which is faster, melting of ice or freezing of water? Since Nibiru went by, moving our poles and the equator, we have only had a summer. Wait until winter arrives.
Heres your foil hat .
I'm not a scientist or anything but isn't pollution one of the reasons why the caps are melting? And if so why didn't they mention it?
The direct effect of pollution over the melting is the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere which increases the global temperature. They mentioned it, the "industrial age" is basically the point where because of industry the world began polluting the atmosphere with CO2 along with other shit.
The increase of CO2 amounts because of pollution is one of the causes, which is why an international law has been adopted that gives each country a limit of how much CO2 they can produce in a year. Many countries that have a small developed industry can actually sell the rights to another country to pollute on their account.
But as the video says, beside the pollution there are other causes as well, the pollution being the only one we can directly influence though.
thats were the debate lies, no one is arguing that climate is changing, but the cause of it is very uncertain and hottly debated, yes co2 does have an effect but how much is unknown
SpOnSoRuNM Ok Thank u
auchucknorris
It is important that Co2 in the atmosphere be regulated because we do not fully understand what it will do.
I am the M00N We 'know" it traps heat from escaping back into space, which will warm the planet. That's all we need to know don't you think?
SpaceRip, thank you for the amazing channel. This will be my nostalgia in the future.
the Al and Gretta cash show, send them money President Trump has cut them off, so if you are A Dummocratt empty your 401k give it to the Al and Gretta show, so they will support our fraud on the public! Please stop the Propaganda we are very tired of it! Less than 1/2" if that in 100 years!
how there are people who still deny global warming is beyond me.
Wrong title. Correct title is - “scientific explanation of earths temperature variation over the past 2 billion years”
Human activity is not the only cause for climate change, it's just the only thing we can do anything about. Whatever we can do may only buy us a little time. Probably not a lot of time. Great work on your video.
I watch these videos and falls asleep. Thank you, Uncle lullaby 🌚
2019 November - Daytona Beach Florida still above water.
Life thrived and will thrive better again without any ice. More rain means less wildfires too. Ice and fire are the enemies of life.
The title is not accurate. It spends more time talking about the past, and the present.
the last few minutes are only talking about the future
*****
That's constructive
gommtu
What are you talking about? I am just saying this video doesn't talk about the future of our planet much... It spent the last few minutes talking about the future... it should be renamed that's all.
gotta know the past to understand the future
unbreakable footage
I agree. But this documentary IS about the past - it should be named accordingly. I already know about the past, now I am interested in learning about the future predictions of how the past will impact the future :)
finding a video focused on the future is difficult if the ones about the past have a name like, "Earth in 1000 years" :/
gommtu
I don't want something "carved in stone" just a guest or theory would be fine. I will just draw my own I suppose :)
Scientific consensus on global warming for which humans are responsible:
- National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
- NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
- The Royal Society of the UK (RS)
- Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
... and many more.
The earth is flat man.
The world will be here in 1000, and 10,000,and 100,000,000 years. We, however, might not be.
Science videos sure do spark a lot of religious conversation
Thats because they have become the same thing.
It's happened before and the biosphere will recover. It saddens me how many unique lifeforms global warming, pollution, and human expansion will kill off.
the Al and Gretta cash show, send them money President Trump has cut them off, so if you are A Dummocratt empty your 401k give it to the Al and Gretta show, so they will support our fraud on the public! Please stop the Propaganda we are very tired of it! Less than 1/2" if that in 100 years!
@@curtdenson2360 Fuck off dumbass.
@Chandler Howard Over 100 million years ago Earth had like twice the CO2 content
This guy is the best narrator on youtube, wonder if he is still around?
I think I found all the missing ice, someone put it in Wisconsin.
We all need to pay higher energy prices so that David Geffen's beach house won't get washed away?
A smart man would sell his Oceanside property, then buy a lake front in Minnesota. 😉
1800s
@@johnwest3287 Well, Al Gore, who warned us all about the oceans rising........went on and bought a 9 mill mansion on the beach in Florida. But we should sell.
Cheap, preferably.
Yes we must understand that change is what our Planet will continue doing. Life won't be easy which is why we're suppose to love everyone including those who don't treat us respectful. This is why I believe in God and Jesus Christ.
They never explain why the planet has been warming for the last 22,000 years.
y2knoproblem Cycles of warming and cooling as a result of changes in earth title, path around the sun, sun activity, and other factors.
@y2knoproblem. No actually the climate of the last 22,000 years has been explained in detail, but you never read it! Did you expect someone would deliver the story directly to you? At any rate here is what you don't understand about the climate for the last 22,000 years.
22,000 years the earth was still deep in an ice age especially in the northern hemisphere. The glaciers did not even begin to retreat from that latest of glacial periods until about 3,000 years later. By 10,000 years ago most the ice had retreated to the Arctic. The Milankovitch cycles returned to a pattern closer to today's and because of warming of the oceans CO2 was released back into the atmosphere which amplified the warming started by the change in the Milankovich cycles. CO2 returned to a level of 270 ppm where it remained stable until the start of the industrial age when it began to rise. CO2 has gradually increased since then and starting about 1900 began cause slight warming in the climate. This was not apparent until about 1980 and since then the warming has been a steady upward trend as CO2 continues to rise.
Great explanation! I hope s/he reads it1 The warming and cooling cycles of the earth are tens of thousands of years long, not a few years long. One extra hot summer doesn't mean the earth is warming. One extra cold winter doesn't mean the earth is cooling. An occasional year of bad hurricanes doesn't mean anything about the long cycle.
@Southeastern777 Your explanation needs some help so how about this? During the ice ages CO2 did follow temperature. When it started to cool BECAUSE the Milankovitch Cycles reduced the sun light reaching the earth the oceans also began to cool. This allowed the oceans to naturally absorb CO2 from the atmosphere which amplified the cooling.
And when the M Cycles changed and allowed more sunlight to reach the earth the oceans began to warm and the CO2 was returned to the atmosphere to AMPLIFY the warming.
But this is not what is going on now. WE humans are the ones adding CO2 to the atmosphere which in turn is forcing CO2 into the oceans. That CO2 in turn changes to carbonic acid and bicarbonate. Over time like, decades, temperatures increase depending on how fast CO2 is added to the atmosphere. The heat increase in the atmosphere is also adding heat to the oceans warming the oceans.
It is true that water vapor is a stronger green house gas, but it doesn't raise temperatures by itself because if it did we would see a viscious cycle of ever increasing temperatures as when temperatures rise the atmosphere holds more moisture causing temps to rise again and so on. THAT is NOT what we are seeing. Water vapor is a feed back. It is the GHG's of CO2 and methane increasing which actually lead to an increase in warming with water vapor enhancing the warmth by increasing humidity. Ever notice how 90 degrees F FEELS much warmer at 90 % humidity then 90 degrees at 0 % humidity?? That's the effect of water vapor at higher concentrations. The temperature is still 90 degrees, but it FEELS warmer.
This is all thoroughly explained at realclimate.org
I remember that. I'm still laughing. Instead we had about 15 years of few hurricanes. They can't tell you if it's going to rain in 4 hours. I don't trust their projections for 20 years from now.
Comments section consistency
75% religious arguments
10% of the actual video
15% of civilization ending
which shows the actual stupidity of the human race.
By that token, 10% of the humans will survive, becoming a grand total of only 700 million people. The world will live on and everything will heal.
@@johnmiller7453 you are the cleverest human i guess
@Southeastern777 I really hope you're not trying to call science a religion. 😕
@Southeastern777 Says who? I've never heard any serious scientist call it a religion. A few selling something, maybe, but you get some charlatans in every group.
Hmmm- the arctic ice rebounded in 2103- I have heard that there was more ice coverage in 2014 than in recent history, since we have been monitoring. What was it like in 2015 and 2016?
Who needs scientists when there are so many "experts" on RUclips.
Trump voter?
This movie looks so cool!...when will this comes out?
Channels who authorize ads in the middle of uploads don't deserve a single sub.
Considering how much energy it would take to melt 1,555,574 cubic miles of ice (from Greenland), I think rising sea levels might be the least of our problems.
+
thanks officer doofy
@@babaganoosh7020
Whatsa mattah Sugar Panties? Can't handle the math?
If we up CO2, then food production increases and starving and freezing to death becomes a myth.
More CO2, please.
Not necessarily. The climate will become more dry, which will decrease food production. In areas like northern Europe, changing sea currents will bring down temperatures radically. Coastal areas with both urban and agricultural populations will be lost, causing demographic upheavals. Any benefits from CO2 increase will be short-term, followed by severe drawbacks in the long term.
Food will get so expensive , we won't be able to afford it anyway.
@@peterlewerin4213 and they say about 7000 yrs ago the Sahara desert was mostly green.
@@peterlewerin4213 BS. The earth's most productive era's had CO2 levels 4-5 times higher than we have now.
@@puppysayshi7848 To be clear: the Earth will be fine with higher CO2, higher temperature, and rising sea levels.
*We* (and most animal life) won't.
If I lived to be 1K years, I would be concerned. The earth is capable of resetting itself.
I'm hardly worried about this.
So what your saying is climate change is normal ? 🤔
Who said what when why? Ice ice more ice
For the earth, climate change is normal. For the living life on our planet, the human-created climate change is dangerously abnormal.
Per Eskelund human created??? Did you watch the video?? Temp increase of 1C in the whole of the industrial revolution. Carbon levels in the atmosphere are only 1/3 of what they were pre last ice age. What exactly do you think we could do to have an affect on the whole planet?? Nothing, that is what. Everything is cycles, there have been many nice ages before, and many warnings. How do you explain them?? But yet, “this” specific warming. (Of only 1C) is so crazy and Bad?? If humans think they are the cause of the weather then they seriously need to check their egos! Lol. We are a little blip.
@@iknowyoureright8564 Sorry. I'm from Norway and trusted google translate. It should have been "man-made climate change". My mistake. But apart from the fact that the increase in temperature is closer to 1.5 degrees C, than 1, you elegantly fail to mention that the increase in temperature has occurred over the last 100 of the 200( give or take a few) years since the industrial revulsion occurred. In the first hundred, it was more or less stable.
@@iknowyoureright8564 www.klimarealistene.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Moerner-2.jpg
R.I.P Titanic killers
Gotta love the scientists, telling us all to stop using fossil fuels while they "study" flying in jets.
notyouraverage person How about all the celebs and politicians who flew to the recent climate summit, each in his own plane? Total hypocrites.
Great video! Looks like we have nothing to worry about regarding global warming. A one point it said that ocean level would only rise 1 meter by 2100. No problem.
Makes me wonder why people get so worked up.
The only worries are that communism is rising.
Oceans are fine.
If humans manage to survive for another 1000 years, I'm pretty sure, that Earth, maybe even the solar system won't be the only place we'll be at.
*****
The humans have only had this desturctive knowledge for about 70 years and look what they have done up to now, last another 1000 years I very much doubt it.
rick petch
What have we done with it? Let's see... The basics of it have gotten us up to space... We've created a new superweapon... And, oh, I almost forgot - the most powerful way of making energy available to us technologically!
And poisoning the world while you are making it, what good is going to space doing for the Earth, and super weapons for killing with that dare not be used because of the radiation it spreads around the Earth, plus what do you do with the spent radioactive rods, bury them in the Earth till they start leaking out of their containers,
Yes we have done a lot to look after the Earth haven't we,
Everything the yanks make is for killing with,
You must be a very frightened lot you yanks.
rick petch
You'll have to get over the fact that we're human. This rock is screwed. I suggest you take up the same stance and look for a way out. We can take care of planets when we have the necessary technology to do so without greatly impacting the budget or energy output.
Me, no way I am nearly at the end of my time on this planet, age is catching up with me fast,
It's up to you young ones to do something about it,
Good luck to you.
I've already planned my 1000th birthday. I think I'll come back to Earth for a day and spend it here
Hello Hello Are we invited?
Well, I'm 51 now, so I predict I'll be dead.
U still here unatuber???
55 meeeeeeeeeeeee tooooo ..lol
If you believe this nonsense video, be asssured - you're dead already.
Take ya pill your almost there anyway don't let the erectile disfunction get you down there are plenty of golden girls up at the bingo hall maybe you can get one of them to come over and put a puzzle together and talk about back in my day sunny boy.
I'm 63 I'll be dead B/4 "U" Lol
7 metres of sea level rise would not happen overnight so there would be ample time to move or build up the land to compensate. 1000 ppm of CO2 is ideal for photosynthesis so not something to be fearful of.
1,000-2,000ppm Complaints of drowsiness and poor air. (from a safety site)
Shit for brains
The ice loss in West Antartica, despite 2014 being a record year for ice formation for the whole continent, has been found to be caused by volcanic vents under the ice.
combatjumpmaster89 사용자 모임 가는 켐핑의 화엄사에 앞배에 9월 30일부터 10월 10일날 가지에 켕핑장에 총집합하다
@7:02 Plants and animals didn't evolve.. God created them.
lol no just no
The two are not necessarily exclusive, even die-hard creationists acknowledge evolution exists. Ever hear of mutations?
Don't mind them. You have every right to express your own beliefs. I don't agree with you on this one but I do appreciate your courage to speak your mind here, exposing yourself to predictably hostile replies.
Evolution is a way to explain why there's such an astounding amount of different normal organisms, strange organisms indifferent to the human species, and organisms causing sickness and death in humans. The vast number of species, and their fantastic variety yet all joined together by their common DNA, places humans as one species of millions, with common heritage from ancient times.
If a god made all the organisms, he also made the tiny, insentient organisms that cause sickness and death in the species he's most interested in, the species who prays to their god and praises their god. Unlike evolution, which has an explanation for this, religious conjecture can only suggest unlikely scenarios for why human sickness and death is necessary and afflicts believers as much as non-believers.
Until religion comes up with something resembling a theory, the Theory of Evolution is the best theory of life's origin. Potentially, a more refined scientific theory may come along that explains it even better, but faith in a better religious one appearing is misplaced.
Only God knows who created plants and animals, haha! Anyway, actually one can laugh about religious people, but before anyone does that, try to prove it wasn't God. I bet you are not going to succeed!
... So... Antarctica is a complete separate continent on its own? Not just a huge ice sheet? Good lord... there's probably diamonds... oil... and other rare resources there...
+Dave Strider (Future) ....
+Dave Strider (Future) ... OIL??? Time to wage war against the penguins
Bob Bobson I mean it would make sense... you find resources on a continent... unless it's just a huge ass sheet of ice. In which case then never mind. But if there's like, rock, and soil and other things like that under the snow and ice, then there's more than likely an entire continent of resources we can take advantage of if we could get over bitter cold. B l
+Dave Strider (Future) Yes, and Aliens too.
+Dave Strider (Future) its mainly just a continental glacier, so we can find minerals but it'd be extremely expensive and hard to get oil from it through all of the ice, wind and so on. so yes, there are resources, but it's probably easier to steal them from other countires
Not only did this video not show the Earth in 1000 years, but it didn't even go into much depth. It would have been nice to see impacts of rising climates on ecosystems and extreme weather.
Instead we got the narrator telling us that the melting ice will heighten water levels over and over.
nothing to worry about,,,humans will be long gone,,,earth will resume business as usual
Earth will be extremely happy that we are gone.
That'll be a very happy day for earth 🌎 I can already see it celebrating with colorful landscaping everywhere.
Everyone in this comment thread should kill themselves
Couldn't the 1 degree Celsius difference be explained by things like better measurement methods, more measurements in previously uncharted tropical areas and possibly even more people living, hence measuring in various environments?
No, you are making a bunch of incorrect assumptions about how the conclusion was reached. Instead of making assumption about how scientists do their work, why not read their research articles and cast your assumptions aside.
OmG! We'll never get off this planet alive. We best make the best of it now. :)
I wonder what happen if science proves the fact that industrialization and driving SUVs saved the earth from another Ice Age.
It is more likely that climate change will end in a mini-ice age due to warming and the resultant freshening of the North Atlantic ... stalling the Gulf Stream.
Will that happen in the lifetime of those presently breathing? Who knows?
My point is, the increase in greenhouse gasses since the industrial revolution, which unquestionably is increasing average global temperatures ... could, indeed, lead to a global cooling.
Fact is, the global climate is too complex to say. But, there is absolutely no question that the climate is changing. Which is precisely why "global warming" is not really an accurate description of what's going on.
If you're fairly young, say 30something ... with a normal lifespan ... you will witness the dislocation of hundreds of millions of coastal residents. Not to mention further wars waged for resources. Not just crude oil, but also water and food.
Nuno Pestana Bravo to Portugal for your forward thinking with regard to non-fossil energy sources. The USA has a long way to go to catch up. Sadly, lots of big money interests aren't so far sighted.
I'm kind of surprised at your assessment of Portugal's health care system, even though I'm sure you know of which you speak. Just surprising it isn't better than the USA's system... although Obamacare does show promise. Here's hoping the flat-Earthers don't inflict too much damage on it.
As it is now, the USA has the best health care money can buy. Rich people from all over the world come here for treatment of serious illnesses. But, if you're not rich you're kind of screwed here in the good ol' USA. And most of us aren't rich.
In 1,000 years the ice will still be here!
I am watching this and im getting to sleep ,This man voices are makes me relaxing to take me to sleep
Did I miss earth in 1000 years?
28:50 If CO2 returns to pre-industrial levels, then the Milankovich cycles of climate change can take over and return us to glacial conditions. Then, we won't have to worry about sea level rise. We will have to contend with our northern cities being buried by a mile or more of ice sheet!
Climate change happens! Warming is better! It means more rain, more plant growth, more life!
Its not the warmth but the loss of habitat that causes death. Eventually, the runaway heating will also kill you
Yipeeeee!lol
Warming is not "Better" if it causes record droughts (Texas in the 1950's, Colorado in the 1990's, Australia at this point). Texas: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950s_Texas_drought Colorado droughts: ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/pdfs/ahistoryofdrought.pdf Australia: time.com/longform/australia-drought-photos/
Chaos is good. Chaos is change. Chaos births the new. If there was no chaos, the universe would be static and unchanging.
solid, thoughtful documentary.
Another fantastic video courtesy of ***** - absolutely brilliant!
I think we will be living on earth for a very long time before we inhabit another planet, simply because it is far far easier to sustain the livability on our planet than to establish livability on another one. The effects of low g and atmospheric inconsistencies on other planets alone would take a very long time to deal with compared with altering our own climate which is already relatively fine tuned for our survival regardless of its fluctuations.
Cam 1000 yrs back were amazing
oh god, getting eco messages jammed down my throat. i thought this was gunna be something fun to watch
iamihop As if you would know?
iamihop
Everyone is an expert on the interent, didn't you know? Yes, i'm sure he has a PhD in Geological Science, where as I have a PhD in Oceanography.
iamihop
and yet "more", guess that's a bitch
iamihop
Yes well because it's SO hard to find a link these days.
Everything is credible on the internet, didn't you know?
www.ocean.washington.edu/home/Marta+Wolfshorndl
*Wolf*shorndl
#ThisIsTheInternetLOL
Ah yes, the usual suspects (links) jolly good!
All I can say is: haha, have fun with your "big head"
This is the 2013 version of what we have today: "Quick, give us all your money or we're all dead! Totally Serious!!"
ruclips.net/video/OuGwIHeUg2c/видео.html
Fear Porn Cult = "Obey Us! Don't question Us! The debate is Over! Only we can save all ewe sheeple!" That's just another reallllly bad religion.
Yes, if we don't surrender our freedoms to sociopaths that are obsessed with power then we will all parish from global destruction. Hurry! Time is running out! Don't question it, just react or die!
@@hotcoffee7933 couldn't have said it any better. "What's the hold up folks, get in line and Obey to save your kids and yourselves!!! No time to question!!!!" F 'ing cult of parrots and sheeple dreaming they are the only awake ones.
Every time I see a documentary like this I cant help but think this planet is going to die horribly
i'm from the year 3014. i came back in time just to type this awesome youtube comment
Quick question. .. did that Jesus guy roll through? Or no?
Cant predict the weather for the week but can predict what earth will look like in 1000 years okay until they can predict the weather correctly for a year I don't believe any theory's about the future.
I realize I'm replaying to someone named "MrTrollingisepic," but in the event you are being genuine, it is important to realize there is a difference in Weather and Climate.
What you are talking about is weather, and difficulty in measuring and predicting specific meteorological events. (Whether or not it will rain today, or if it will only be cloudy/sunny, etc.)
This video deals with a much broader view of things, in which they make predictions about CLIMATE, and the changes that would happen to it based on very real, measurable variables such as Milankovitch cycles, ocean current disruption, etc.
You spelt 'theories' incorrectly.
the narrator's voice is incredible.
When the ice melts and sea levels rise, beachfront properties will fall into the ocean. A lot of them will be rich people's houses, and they will predictably blame everyone else.
save ppl 31 mins of watching.
Q: What will Earth be like in 1000 years?
A: Dunno.
This is amazing..ice melting the shape of currents.the formation.
I see so many ppl talking about the last 10-20 years. This is a big planet, and if we inflickted so mutch changes that we see a big diffrents in so sort time, we whould be dead whitin 200 years. this time scale is mutch bigger. but the things is that we alone cant do it, in the best we just help it along. just think about all the co2 that are in the ice.
But non the less. this is doomed to happen whitout us or not. better to find way to adapt then to try and stop the cycle of our dear planet;)
Apart from agreeing with you, I find your comment quite fascinating because of how you've spelt some of the words.
Obviously, English is not your first language, but your gist is a good use of the language, and very comprehensible.
Stay well, wherever you are...;-)
More plants= less co2 cmon guys lets get planting
Magnífico excelente qualidade de som documentário muito bom parabéns obrigado
Why should I care what happens after I'm dead?
curiosity?
LOL... It's neat to be able to see this stuff. I am an explorer of sorts. Lately there has been good science and bad science and you just don't know who to trust. As far as knowing what is about to happen is concerned they can't even predict tomorrow's weather any more. So if it doesn't directly affect me I really have no interest. What get's my goat is people who are lying, using bad science to do so and collecting money because of it. They all should be shot, burned and then drug through the streets to be pissed on.
Why should we care about YOU while you're here now?
I have no need for YOU to care about me. I take care of myself thanks.
mobiltec lol
Considering the fact that our human ancestors have existed 400,000 years ago, I'm pretty confident that human beings will survive for a very long time. Maybe not everyone, maybe not even a whole lot, but it's been found that most males today contain a chromosome that date way back to one common ancestor and the same for a female who dates back to around 250,000 years ago or so...
That's a very long time and I'm sure in the next 200 years human beings are going to advance to a whole other degree. Some freak genius will come up with a freak idea or we might even succeed in making Mars our new home. You can never tell, but human beings have proved to be very persistent as a species.
I too think humans will live a long time, but we as a species are really young. 400,000 is not a long time, geologically or evolutionary speaking. Besides that, 400,000 years is the extreme guess, most scientists think we are more like 200,000 years old IIRC
sander395 indeed but if you really look at it, how can humans possibly die out? Meteors? Nuclear disaster? Humans will always survive because we are like the shit stains under your shoe, we'll dissapear for 99% but always rise again. it would take a major nastural disaster that wipes out almost all life on earth to get rid off humans. Once the food is again we're next.
***** exactly
400,000 years is a drop in the bucket of geological or evolutionary time. If your particular 400,000 years happens (unlikely, of course) to end tomorrow, then that ends that. Extrapolations into the future, linear or otherwise, are not very smart because the future is one thing about which we don't know shit. Humans may survive and humans may not, but most species once rampant are no longer with us. Where did we get the idea that maybe we are the end all and be all of evolution, the coveted lovely apply of God's eye, in a manner of speaking. Arguments about what or whether humans will survive are like arguments about what the color will be of the next car you meet. Extrapolation get abused the same way statistics does. I wish our educational system delivered a few of the basics, but it doesn't, really.
Larry Sherk I did not mean that humans would live forever. If you read what I said, I said'a long time' .True. I wish the 'education system' delivered better... Better patience and discipline before ranting on misunderstandings.
This video gets points for solar driven climate change per the Milankovitch cycle, how ocean ice sheets melt (very good) and how land ice is held back. It gets a few demerits for not explaining how land ice sheets actually retreat, since it reflects solar energy, plus how 4/100 of 1% of CO-2 can make any difference at all?
Final proof that Earth will prevail, having cast off its human vermin & keeping her best. We'll all be long gone and the planet will remain renewed. We all ask: " When will it end?"
The answer is simple: WE end...
You believe propaganda?
@Amy Xoxo Pretty sure that causing a mass extinction would mean humans are WORSE than vermin. www.independent.co.uk/environment/mass-extinction-humans-causing-earth-deaths-end-times-warning-a7765856.html
@Amy Xoxo We are speaking metaphorically if we observe how disrespectful we treat every other living creature around us including our own?
People are not vermin
@John Barber you are a judmental pompus ass and gay just means happy
We need to find a new planet and discover space travel or we will be fucked.
Probably not. In a couple hundred years, our technology will have advanced enough so that this will not affect us too much.
chommy Obviously, but im talking about the human race as a whole.
So we can fuck up that new planet to...
I bet you if we brought all the best scientists together we would probably discover some crazy shit. I mean look at the Nazis by working together they made a rocket and the nuke which shows just how efficient we can be by working together.
However, the environment is not going to be a issue in the future we will probably build something to sustain or rebuild our environment like a filter on massive scale.
Wonderful Video good information well done keep it up
the sequoia tree im planting will be middle aged 1000 years from now
Or the world WILL end
Daniel son
@@BizarroLanigirod just bc we die doesn't mean the world ends
@@jerimiahstephens8580 i agree 100%
Man-made climate change denial was best explained by George Carlin: "Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that."
Angus Davies nobody denies it?saying “climate change denial” is just a way to discredit any who questions the solution, Once these a realistic and doable solution Most will be all for it.what do U think” these people “are going to do to combat it? Or should we just throw money at something cause it makes us feel better.? How bout I’ll drive ur goofy lil car and u guys pay for it and the rest of us will pay ya back when it works.?
Angus Davies,
How about we in the North sell you some Ice bergs, and global freezing. Then you'd not need or think to worry about it. Should those in the Tundra Zones or to 60º latitude really run around telling people to be concerned about warming tempretures when day time tempretures only rise above freezing briefly in June?
"..some people are really fucking stupid. Did you ever notice that? How many stupid people there are? God damn, theres a lot of dumb bastards walking around.." 😁
AHAHAHAHAHAAAA! That’s the funniest, most accurate....😳...observation I have seen so far.
top notch! how can u dislike this?
+tropickman
Easy
Just knowing how out of wack and misinforming it is makes me hate it.
Misinforming? bahahaha... Good one.
wheres all of the religious slurs?
I don't know. But earth is only 6000 years old.
oh yeah i know.... its no more than that!
Matthew McGinnis i think, repeat think, nake89 was being sarcastic.. i sincerely hope so. Hence my come back with equal satire ;)
nake89 and you are 6 year old.
Roger Lee
Buddy....pretty sure that was sarcasm....
Carbon dioxide is only .04% of our atmosphere. 95% of greenhouse gases is water vapor. The reason why scientists say that CO2 is a problem is because even if it "warms" the earth only a little bit, this causes more water vapor in the air and an increase in temperatures. They don't know how much CO2 actually increases temperature by itself however the thinking is if the level of CO2 increases temperature by 1 degree Celsius, then the water vapor increase created by that warming would in turn raise the temperature another degree or two. What they fail to tell everyone is that the CO2 level has been much higher in earth's history and life thrived. They also fail to inform people that we are at the tail end of an interglacial and it is supposed to be warming up. The ice is supposed to melt which in turn allows the ground to absorb more heat making the earth warmer. This will also increase water vapor levels and help warm the earth. Whatever the case, the ice age is going to return soon (few thousand years or less). What raises my attention is that CO2 is the only gas that the government can tax. This is too much of a coincidence for me to dismiss. They seem more sure about global warming than Biologists are about Evolution. This surprises me because in regards to temperature increases, there could be hundreds or even thousands of variables that go into temperature fluctuations. Possibly millions. To look at CO2, nod your and act so sure that it is the culprit of temperature increase is phenomenal. Another thing to ask is how much of the CO2 increase being noticed is because of deforestation? We know that solid forest used to extend from the Mississippi river all the way to the East Coast of the United States. The same story is played out all over the world with the Amazon seeing terrible losses in forest. In the Northern Hemisphere we see oscillations in CO2 levels between the winter and summer. This is because in the winter, plants die or go dormant (increasing CO2 levels). The summer months bring life back to the vegetation (decreasing CO2 levels). If for instance we do away with forests and vegetation then one would expect that CO2 levels would not fall as much in the summer. However we would still see the increase in CO2 levels in the winter. This new oscillation that when plotted on a graph, would show a yearly increase in CO2.
Josh Ferr The main point isn't that temperatures were higher in the past it's that they've never changed this fast without ecosystems collapsing. There are several positive feed back loops that would be triggered by a rapidly changing carbon level.
Also, a small percentage of carbon doesn't mean it's effect will be small. That all depends on the physics of carbon molecules.
Dans 100 Millions d'années, Grenoble sera toujours un paysage de montagne. Cool.
What? The climate actually changed before man was even here?
ikr?! And apparently the earth has done this throughout it's 4.5 billion year life! Who would have thought, huh?
@@darthdonkulous1810 You are some dumb and stupid beyond belief. I guess you think the thousands of climate scientists who have all come to the same conclusion are all in a big conspiracy to make people pay Carbon tax which you have all been paying for nearly 10 yrs now and didn't even notice...lol
has anyone commenting even watched the video?
I would have strongly supported the "rift-valley" hypothesis of C.A. Campbell III, instead of the one presented here being that it's simply "a central drainage canyon" based only on the nice looking animation.
Further, if all that ice melted relieving the mantle and that "canyon" went from being a mile below sea-level to one mile above sea-level, then certainly the surrounding region elsewhere would sink a mile or so, perhaps rapidly (in relative terms).
An inundation of catastrophe covering thousands of square miles perhaps as far as New England. One can hope.
This must have been made before IPCC 5 hen they realised their climate models were all wrong.
***** Oh, so the climate models were right?
Yes. Because they found out observation were worse then the models predicted..
@@hedf a few months ago they found out they were faking numbers .. to get their agenda right.. it is all BS.. the trial riders i ride with are more informed than you are..
Hello from 2019 with a planet on fire.
Yeah climate models. You have to take satellite and weather data and run it in a supercomputer with 1000's of smart people who know about maths and chemistry and physics every hour. sometimes you run them for months, sometimes a year and then you recalibrate. It's tough science. Super hard to predict the future. But most of the climate models are actually spot on. 1.1C now, 1.5 by 2025. 2.4C by 2035. And regrettably 5C by 2100. We have failed to appreciate feedbacks.
www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/modelling-systems/new-flagship-climate-models
Earth in 1000 years? I'd say it would be in a nuclear wasteland.
I wont be to sure about that, we have already seen the effects of a nuclear bomb, I I dont think we would want to see that happen on a mass scale so will do our best to not randomly start firing nuclear missiles all other the planet.
We've done pretty good so far. Have a little more faith in your species!
Raquayza L'Gendary Honestly, I try. but it fades further and further everyday as our governments wage war. I do have a bit of faith for our species, but not for the men that control us.
No, it will be consumed by black plastic bags.
If we don't change in many ways... we'll be gone long before 1000 years goes by.
Tom White Maybe